YT YouTube2Text

YouTube2Text → Transcripts → God's Secret Code Hidden in Your DNA | Gregg Braden

God's Secret Code Hidden in Your DNA | Gregg Braden — Transcript

by Gregg Braden Official · 8,839 words · 1,271 segments · language en · Watch on YouTube

Open in transcriber Summarize with AI Download SRT/VTT

Full transcript

0:00how did this all start for you let's go
0:02back to the beginning go back to the
0:03beginning we're filming in Denver
0:05Colorado and it began right here in
0:06Denver Colorado in the Rocky Mountain
0:08Area I was uh lot of our our viewers
0:12don't know this uh behind the scenes I
0:14worked uh in the defense industry during
0:16the last years of of the Cold War a very
0:18frightening time and indeed in the
0:20history of our our world when the two
0:23superpowers at the time did the
0:25unthinkable and and actually created
0:27they they spent the the energy the
0:30Manpower the resources the technology to
0:32create the
0:33weapons uh to microwave the Earth many
0:36times over in the event that the nuclear
0:38war ever occurred it was during that
0:41time George I was I if you can imagine I
0:43found myself working behind the scenes
0:45supporting writing software for the
0:47missile program supporting
0:49that that effort uh by day and by night
0:54um ever since I was young I've I've been
0:57a scholar of some of our most ancient
0:59and cherished spiritual traditions and
1:01some of the most mysterious texts of our
1:04past and I have felt uh for a very long
1:07time George that if we knew where to
1:10look in the past that we would find the
1:14key and perhaps a message from our
1:17ancestors that would help us to
1:20transcend the differences that have led
1:22to the great Wars of the 20th and now
1:24the 21st century and at that time the
1:26kind of war that I was supporting so it
1:29was during that time uh that I began a
1:32search and a research of comparative
1:35Traditions uh helping us to understand
1:38our Origins because my again my thinking
1:40was if if we could find a way to show
1:44Beyond any reasonable doubt Beyond The
1:47Superficial outward demonstrations that
1:51we are actually uh we are one and for
1:54some people it's a very new age
1:56sounding uh uh hope or wish but but I
1:59think there is a lot of power in showing
2:01that that unification is is possible
2:03helping us to to transcend those
2:05differences so my
2:07journey uh began to take me back into
2:11older and older and older texts cutting
2:14through the red tape you were almost
2:15obsessed with it and the religions well
2:18I would say passionate I prefer passion
2:21over Obsession my wife would probably
2:23say I was obsessed so because the clues
2:26every time I would find the clue George
2:28and I think okay maybe this is it and
2:31then it's not going to go anywhere else
2:32it would open the door to something else
2:33and open the door to something else and
2:35that led me from the textbooks onto a
2:37series of Journeys my first journey was
2:39in Egypt in 1986 and what I found in
2:42Egypt on the temple walls led me into
2:45the the highlands of uh of the Andes
2:48Mountains of Southern Peru which
2:50directed me right into the Tibetan
2:52plateau and the temples and the
2:54monasteries in Tibet as a scientist my
2:57thinking is if if I'll speak about
2:59myself personally if I can find the
3:03information uh least disturbed by the
3:05modern world that's where it would be
3:07most intact and to go to those places
3:11you've got to to make the effort to to
3:13get there they're some of the most
3:15magnificent beautiful remote isolated
3:17pristine places remaining on the world
3:19did I say remote by the way because
3:21because they are but it's in the
3:23monasteries in the naries uh where many
3:25of these texts are preserved and they've
3:27been largely forgotten truly amazing T
3:30so well they are so so as I began my
3:33search uh my thinking was if we could
3:38really pin down our Origins you know the
3:42the science the best science of the 21st
3:44century is now overturning so many of
3:46Darwin's ideas and and by the way Darwin
3:48was open to that he was willing for his
3:51ideas to fall he he viewed them as
3:53stepping stones toward greater
3:55understandings so Darwin was okay with
3:58that and I I began to see a connection
4:02in the texts uh that was not accounted
4:06for in the theories of of evolution and
4:09it is a connection that is very
4:10controversial today now Darwin didn't
4:12have access to the tools and the
4:14technology he certainly didn't have the
4:16DNA databases that we have so this is
4:20this is where I began part of my job in
4:22software development was in writing
4:24pattern recognition software uh and I've
4:28I've searched patterns ever since
4:30to this sure it comes very naturally for
4:32me I used to you know look at patterns
4:33on flashing patterns on blinking lights
4:36on Christmas trees and I mean you know
4:38you see them everywhere so I thought if
4:40there are patterns uh in nature and we
4:44are uh we are nature they should show up
4:46in our DNA and it was in the 80s when
4:49the DNA databases uh we could actually
4:52begin to access them without being part
4:54of the research projects so to make a
4:56long story really brief what I found
5:00was in one of the most obscure uh and
5:03ancient of the texts a book called The
5:05saer
5:06yuts it is a Hebrew text that has only
5:09been translated a couple of times a
5:11couple of authors into English it's so
5:14mysterious George that very few Scholars
5:16even want to talk about it because they
5:17don't know what to say about it it's a
5:19it's a brief text it's only about 2,000
5:20lines all right and it is written as if
5:23an observer were present the day that
5:26the Creator created humankind step by
5:28step huh however it's written in a
5:30language it doesn't make a lot of sense
5:32to is it like genesis or totally
5:34different it's very different from
5:35Genesis I think Genesis probably
5:37partially derived from this text the
5:41seit uh which is the book of creation
5:43that literally translates to the book of
5:45creation so it was as if someone were
5:50watching the Creator actually create the
5:52first person doing what he did doing
5:54what he did but it is not written
5:57scientifically the bottom line to what
6:00the the text is
6:01saying is that through language
6:06humankind was created and that that
6:08doesn't make a lot of sense if you take
6:10it literally but as I began to follow
6:13the instructions as the author created
6:16them in this text and this George this
6:18is to me this is the power of
6:21transcending the boundaries between
6:23science and spirituality because if if a
6:26a scientist only looked at the Elements
6:29of Life you'd never make this discovery
6:30if you only look at the spiritual text
6:32you would never make this discovery but
6:34it's by blending the two together and
6:37allowing them to tell the story so we
6:40today in modern science we talk about
6:43life as as the result of elements and we
6:47describe elements through word and
6:49through number so we have the periodic
6:51table for example hydrogen nitrogen
6:54oxygen carbon makes up the DNA of our
6:56bodies those are the words and for every
6:59of those words there are a lot of
7:01numbers that may be applied there are 17
7:03different numeric parameters that go
7:05with each of
7:06those so put that aside when you go back
7:09into the ancient text in the saer yra
7:11specifically they did exactly the same
7:14thing they talked about the power of the
7:17letters of very specific alphabets now
7:20it doesn't make a lot of sense to Modern
7:22Scholars until we begin to understand
7:24that every ancient alphabet bar none
7:28that I have found found so far has
7:31always from day one with each letter had
7:34a number a mysterious number associated
7:36with the letters we don't know where the
7:37numbers came from they never change code
7:40they are it's a unique numeric code the
7:43study of that code is called gatria and
7:46it was actually formalized the laws 32
7:49laws of gatria were formed in the 2
7:52Century they were formalized in the 2
7:55century and the only way gatria works is
7:58is you cannot deviate from these laws
8:00there are specific laws that apply to
8:02the numbers so our ancestors were also
8:05talking about life using words in
8:07numbers so they had the letters of the
8:09alphabets and this mysterious number
8:11we're using the periodic table we got a
8:13whole bunch of numbers right my job was
8:16to find out which of those numbers
8:18equates to the numbers in the ancient
8:20alphabets and if I could do that my
8:22thinking was it would be possible to
8:24look at human DNA carbon oxygen hydrogen
8:28nitrogen and different combin of that
8:30and substitute the ancient letters for
8:34the numbers based upon this
8:37correlation this in retrospect it was
8:40simple but not knowing that it took
8:43years took me 12 years and did you break
8:45it to find what we now know is that the
8:48atomic mass of the elements the numbers
8:50of the atomic mass are the numbers that
8:52equate to the mysterious letters in the
8:55ancient alphabets what that means is
8:58when you look at human DNA or the DNA
9:01DNA of of any life it is made of
9:04hydrogen nitrogen oxygen carbon and
9:08using gatria the numbers that equate to
9:11those become 1 five 6 and three three is
9:15with the carbon and when you then take a
9:18table one of the ancient tables and
9:20you're able to to correlate those
9:22numbers with a letters what we find
9:25George is that the human DNA is is our
9:28genome is buil in in layers and at the
9:31top layers it's like every book has an
9:33introduction the introduction in every
9:36cell of every form of
9:38life carbon based DNA the introduction
9:41is the same and the first translation
9:44literally reads
9:46literal God Eternal within the body God
9:52Eternal within the body and God that is
9:56depicted in the DNA is actually spelled
9:59the way that the name of God was spelled
10:03in the ancient text before it was
10:06removed 6,800 times in the Torah for
10:10example the the sacred name of God is
10:12believed to be so sacred it cannot be
10:14written in its entirety why put it in a
10:17code you know this was uh so first as a
10:21scientist what I have to say is this
10:23people say why is the code there yeah
10:26and I say I don't know all I know is
10:28that when I followed the instructions in
10:30a 3,000 year old text and I applied it
10:32to the periodic table this is this is
10:34what we have next question is it a
10:37coincidence there are no coincidence I
10:39well I have I a statistician Ren the
10:41numbers for me and the odds of this
10:42happening by chance are one to
10:49234,50 to one or the or
10:530.41% right those are the odds that it's
10:55an it's just a just random just random
10:58now
10:59those aren't astronomical odds I I
11:01thought it might be like one to a
11:03bajillion you know but when you take
11:05into account they're still high not
11:08only is the language there but when you
11:12take into account what the words say
11:15that those words actually have meaning
11:17God Eternal within the body and they all
11:19say that the the first letter in all
11:21human DNA if if you can look at the
11:24What's called the the genetic code
11:26ctag uh every one of those made up of
11:29combinations of carbon oxygen hydrogen
11:31nitrogen and they they are arranged I
11:35don't want to be really technical when I
11:36talk about this but they're they're
11:38arranged uh different numbers of carbon
11:42oxygen hydrogen nitrogen atoms So within
11:46each of the DNA bases that make our DNA
11:49as it is there are different
11:50combinations of ctag that break down to
11:53different combinations of God Eternal
11:55within the body and the God within
11:58ourselves Within our DNA is literally
12:01the the same spelling uh of the the God
12:04that was taken from those texts now
12:07here's the beauty I just have to say
12:08this right my first fear was I found it
12:12in the Hebrew language and I said does
12:14that mean could it actually be divisive
12:18if it only is found in one language and
12:21when the research went to its fruition
12:24what we found is it is in Hebrew and
12:27Aramaic and Sanskrit three of the
12:29languages the same thing exactly the
12:31same thing so in Hebrew Aramaic and
12:34Sanskrit the the code for those letters
12:37translates precisely the same in the
12:39human DNA that's the first layer in your
12:42opinion that slogan God Eternal is in
12:46the body what did that mean what it
12:49tells
12:50me uh is because the odds of that
12:54happening by chance are are astronomical
12:57are steep it tells me
12:59intentionality now who or what I I don't
13:01know the answer to that but that tells
13:03me that uh that the DNA the way it's
13:06formed uh
13:07is uh it is intentional and then I began
13:12to think uh in our modern world we're
13:15creators we're artists whenever we
13:17create something that we're proud of
13:19what's when we're finished what's the
13:21last thing we do when we finish it
13:22George you tell me what is the last
13:24thing we do is something we finish a
13:26painting and what's the last thing we do
13:27when we finish that painting you we put
13:29our name on it if there's an
13:31intentionality underlying life itself
13:34and human life specifically it would
13:36make tremendous sense to me that who or
13:38whatever is responsible would somehow
13:40have left a sign is it God's signature I
13:44believe that how however we Define that
13:46who whoever whatever we believe that
13:48Creator is my next question is why not
13:51put it into a text or into a temple wall
13:54and then my thinking was why place that
13:58signature into something that can
14:00crumble over a few thousand years like a
14:02temple wall or into the pages of a book
14:06that can be destroyed why not put it in
14:08the creation itself and as long as the
14:09creation exists the message exists as
14:12well I published this in 2004 even
14:15though the research was incomplete it it
14:18was complete to that point and I wanted
14:20to share this with the
14:23world 2007 Japanese scientists released
14:26a report peer-reviewed report on the
14:30feasibility of storing data in DNA for
14:34thousands of years and what they were
14:36looking at is is bacteria they were
14:39looking at storing information in
14:41bacteria and placing the bacteria in
14:43nuclear waste dumps for example and
14:45letting it sit there and letting it sit
14:47there because the papers might
14:48disintegrate or something else might
14:49happen but if if they could do it so
14:522007 was the first time they
14:55successfully implanted a message into
14:57the DNA of a bacteria
14:59and they Ed bacteria because hoping that
15:02someone in the future one day would use
15:03it well this was a test they used the
15:05bacteria because they have a short
15:07lifespan so they could see how many
15:09generations you know for bacteria the
15:11generations maybe just a few days so the
15:13the code they put into the DNA it was uh
15:17don't say it was the same thing no it
15:19was Einstein's three ofall it was E eal
15:21MC^2 in the year
15:241905 they encoded that into the DNA they
15:28allowed it the DNA to replicate for 25
15:31generations with that code with the code
15:34they pulled the code right out
15:36completely intact so what they're
15:37they're now
15:39demonstrating uh purely uh in the
15:42scientific realm is the feasibility of
15:44storing literal information uh in the in
15:48the genome in the DNA and it remains
15:51intact for as long as the organism
15:53remains intact well here's the puzzling
15:55part if you put a code in there you do
15:58doing it for one of several reasons one
16:01you're hiding it or two you're trying to
16:04pass information on to some future
16:07generation so let's assume that that's
16:09what that is yeah when we extract it and
16:13we get that code what do we do with it
16:17what's it mean I think it depends on
16:18what the code says now we know and the
16:21work is progressing from this point and
16:23in 2015 uh another layer will have been
16:26completely decoded and hopefully you and
16:28I can have this conversation and I'll
16:29share what what we find next the the
16:33point is that there is a message encoded
16:37into the DNA of all human life that
16:38tells us Beyond any reasonable doubt
16:41that the differences that divide us now
16:43are superficial differences and that we
16:46have a common origin a common
16:49ancestry um I was uh I was doing a
16:53conference uh in the DC area and I made
16:56the statement and I I said I would love
16:59to get my hands on some DNA from life
17:02that's not from this world and if it's
17:04carbon based life and if the message is
17:06the same then we know that we have a
17:07common a common goal a common goal and
17:11uh would that be exciting well there's a
17:12man that came forward and said when
17:13you're ready for that DNA let me know
17:15he's got it I don't know maybe from some
17:17Martian meteorite right I know there's
17:19you know we don't know we don't know but
17:22you're going to look take him up on it
17:23I'm going to call him from your cell
17:25phone number George not from my cell
17:26phone number we block your number
17:29uh I'm not ready for that yet uh when we
17:32we're developing the algorithms and
17:35they're very complex algorithms now to
17:37help look at the DNA in in new ways so
17:41here we are we come full circle we are
17:43at this this crisis point in
17:45Civilization when we're facing more more
17:49crisis of such great before than I can
17:51remember based on our division on our
17:54separation and if some way if there is
17:57some way that we could bring forward in
17:59a really powerful meaningful way
18:02something that casts an entire new light
18:05on us as a as a family uh and what that
18:09family means I think it would be it
18:11would give us a reason to look at things
18:13differently it doesn't mean it would
18:15force us to it means it would give us a
18:17scientific reason to look at one another
18:19and think of ourselves very differently
18:21I know for myself once I found this code
18:24I felt differently about myself knowing
18:27that within every cell of my body God
18:29Eternal it's YH VG are the Hebrew
18:33letters YH yah is actually one of the
18:36forms of the name of God that we find in
18:39the Torah that was removed over 6,800
18:41times did it baffle you as to who put
18:44the code
18:46there I've always I've sensed that
18:49there's an
18:50intentionality uh from regarding us and
18:54when we go to look now at Darwin's idea
18:57of evolution
18:592,000 years ago we appeared on this
19:01Earth we don't know where we came from
19:03and what made us different from so many
19:06the other forms of life was human
19:08chromosome number two the largest that
19:10had been fused with two telr to telr
19:13fusions geneticist acknowledge the
19:15fusion they say we can't say how it
19:17happened it but they know it happened
19:19and it did not happen under natural
19:22circumstance they said this would not
19:24happen in nature something has has
19:26forced this chromosome or this telr to
19:29telr Fusion between these two
19:31chromosomes so I think what we're
19:34getting George is is we've had a sense
19:36so many people that there's much more to
19:39us than Evolution has led us to believe
19:41doesn't mean that Evolution didn't occur
19:44uh as a scientist I can say it did to a
19:47point but there's a point where
19:48Evolution does not explain our existence
19:50and cannot account for what we find and
19:53I think this study this kind of work
19:56where we're crossing the traditional
19:58boundaries between science and
20:00spirituality some a scholar studying the
20:02text would never find this uh a
20:04scientist a scientist looking at the
20:06elements in the periodic table or
20:08geneticist would never find it because
20:10they're compartmentalized you need a
20:12combination but the world doesn't work
20:13that way so we are gifting ourselves uh
20:17the ability to see the world as it is
20:19through what the world is sharing with
20:20us if we're open enough but the science
20:23has to be rigid it has to be based upon
20:26what science is telling us so the the
20:28per perodic table uh describes the
20:31elements that make the DNA in our bodies
20:34there's a mathematic link between that
20:36in the the the letters of the ancient
20:39alphabets how that link got there who
20:41put it there I have no idea as I was
20:43flying here Greg from Los Angeles to
20:46Denver and I'm I'm looking around the
20:48plane and there's all these people
20:50sitting on the plane and it just Dawns
20:52on me and I do this a lot every one of
20:55them is an individual they've got their
20:57own little situ ation their problems
21:00their happiness their families every one
21:03of them but the question I kept asking
21:06myself as I looked at this entire Plane
21:08full of
21:10people why what's the reason what do
21:13they here for some had briefcases some
21:16had purses some had
21:19tablets who are they what are they I
21:23still can't get that answer you of
21:26course have brought up a series of six
21:27questions and one of our previous
21:29shows that asks those questions too but
21:34will we ever get that answer why are we
21:38here I think we will have the answer
21:42George the question is will be willing
21:44to accept what the answer says to us is
21:46it frightening I don't think it's
21:48frightening I we've asked science to
21:51tell us who we are and they don't tell
21:53us well science pure science is now
21:57revealing the information it's not being
22:00accepted in the mainstream now it is
22:02changing and it's changing slowly George
22:05and and this is only one place the
22:07evolution is only one place but it it's
22:09the place that's directly relevant to
22:11the god code but will we get that answer
22:12Greg why are we here I think we will
22:18find the the evidence of the
22:21circumstances the actual reason I think
22:25is something that we have to find for
22:27ourselves I think we're individually
22:30individually I think I think that's what
22:31we're going to find a good friend of
22:33mine was watching the movie The Matrix I
22:35know a lot of our view I love it well
22:38cited that on the radio show a lot I I
22:40love it as well it's one that I have by
22:42the TV and when I'm writing into the we
22:44hours the morning there's two movies uh
22:46I don't watch them all the way through
22:47but I contact and Matrix you know how'
22:50you know that because it's the same with
22:52me and I don't watch them all the way
22:53through but I like the part where they
22:55solve the codes because I think there's
22:56a lot to that and you know where does
22:58that come from anyway so my friend said
23:00you think it's science fiction he said
23:01Matrix is actually a documentary about
23:04us yeah and and the way things work in
23:06the world so it may be that by working
23:09backward through the code we do arrive
23:11at at the doorstep of an architect at
23:13some if you could get an answer to one
23:17question what would that question
23:19be I think it's the question we're
23:21asking right now why us why here why
23:25now uh
23:28there's another branch of work that uh
23:31that this follows up on and it is the
23:33study of whether or not we are living in
23:36a simulation or virtual reality and
23:38there is a uh a degreed course in uh one
23:42of the large Eastern universities in
23:44philosophy that you can take and and the
23:46title of the course is are we living a
23:48simulation and to make a long story very
23:50brief what they did was they took a very
23:53complex computer algorithm um plugged in
23:55all kinds of of variables about human
23:58population and trajectories and
24:00economies and families and religious
24:03beliefs all you know all about life and
24:05the bottom line uh is there's over a
24:0893% chance that we are living a
24:11simulation now if you step into a
24:13simulation a virtual environment in
24:15Disneyland you can do that today and not
24:17even really know that that's where you
24:19are and we've only had computers about
24:2160 years if you take the archaeology
24:24that's showing the existence of advanced
24:26technological civilizations thousands of
24:29years where would we be if we had
24:31thousands of years of computer science
24:34to build that kind of AR or that kind of
24:36simulation and the question comes why
24:38would we do this and the the answer for
24:41me is that every simulation is built to
24:44help the people in the
24:47simulation become very well adapted to
24:51somewhere that they're going to be when
24:53the simulation no longer exists the
24:55simulation is a safe place to make
24:57mistakes and learn that power if we are
24:59in fact on Earth living a simulation and
25:02our most cherished Traditions tell us
25:04that we're on our way somewhere else
25:06this isn't it this is an illusion this
25:07is temporary you know in general they
25:09say that then I think we have to look at
25:12what those Traditions are telling us and
25:13they're teaching us about our
25:15relationship to reality uh to uh to
25:19Quantum reality to emotions and emotions
25:23of the heart to create and heal in our
25:26bodies and the world around us and if we
25:28Master those maybe that's what this
25:30simulation is all about God Eternal
25:33within the body uh may
25:35be uh the architect that has helped to
25:39create this simulation do you ever get
25:41frustrated that we don't have the
25:42answers yet I don't George I don't
25:44because what it tells me is and what
25:47I've come to understand is that when we
25:49are truly ready for that information it
25:52it's right there
25:54sometimes this is a perfect example this
25:57this has been around you know for
25:59200,000 years it's only when only to be
26:02discovered though by those who look or
26:05when our technology reaches the point
26:07that it gives us the tools true to take
26:09a peak it's almost like that code we
26:11sent out on one of the Viking crafts
26:13right yeah which Steph Hawkins said
26:15don't do because he's afraid that
26:18they'll come here and he's not so sure
26:20they're very
26:21benevolent yeah that uh it was
26:24interesting I I actually talk about that
26:26code in the book The God code what what
26:28is it that we said who did we write it
26:30to who finds it and how would it be
26:32interpreted yeah so it it makes perfect
26:35sense to me uh if we are the product of
26:37an
26:38intentional uh an intentional creation
26:41that the Creator who or whatever that is
26:43would somehow leave a mark letting us
26:45know when we have the ability to to find
26:48that it is brilliant and I I can't think
26:50of a more honoring way to honor who or
26:53what that Creator is than to take that
26:56code read it and maybe communicate back
26:58back the other
27:01way scientists are no longer asking the
27:04question are we connected the field
27:06tells us that we are now the question is
27:09how deeply are we connected how much
27:12influence do we really have in the world
27:14through this field well there are two
27:18very futuristic scientific experiments
27:21that take us light years beyond anything
27:23that we've believed and science has
27:25accepted in the past I want to share
27:27those with you what they are showing
27:29however has opened the door to a
27:32possibility that modern science is now
27:35struggling with so let's take a look at
27:38these two experiments the first one was
27:41published in the Russian bulletin of the
27:43Leb deev physics Institute
27:461992 and the experiment begins with
27:49something seemingly very innocent a
27:52glass vessel a vase where all of the air
27:57has been completely drawn out of this
27:59vessel to create what we call a vacuum
28:02so a vacuum implies that this vessel is
28:05empty but we know it's not completely
28:08empty because there are still little
28:10photons of light that remain in this
28:13vessel scientists know this so the
28:16question now is where are those photons
28:19they want to get a Baseline and see
28:21where the photons are right now so the
28:24first part of this experiment they draw
28:26the air out of the vessel and then they
28:29measure where these photons are in the
28:33vessel are they all piled up on the
28:35bottom or are they floating around the
28:36inside or they all stuck to the edges
28:39and what they found was no surprise The
28:42Vessel showed that these photons are
28:45completely random they're completely
28:47random by the way these are the same
28:49kinds of photons the particles of matter
28:52that make up the atom itself that we
28:55described in the last episode so we're
28:58dealing with these fundamental particles
29:01of the stuff that our world is made of
29:02and that's important so the scientist
29:05found that the distribution of the
29:07photons in this in this vessel was
29:09completely random no surprise that's
29:12what they
29:13expected the next piece of this
29:16experiment is where while the experiment
29:19is fascinating what I find really
29:22fascinating is the thinking of the
29:24scientists that made the experiment
29:26possible for a scientists trained in the
29:29scientific method based upon all of
29:32those false assumptions that we saw
29:34earlier in this program those
29:35assumptions of of separation for the
29:38scientists to move out of that box of
29:42thinking and begin asking new questions
29:44like what if our assumptions are wrong
29:47what would that tell us about our world
29:49that's where it gets really interesting
29:51and that's what the next part of this
29:52experiment is all about because what the
29:55scientists did was into the a vessel
29:59that had completely random photons they
30:02put human DNA human DNA because they
30:07wanted to see if human DNA has an effect
30:10on the photons before I go any further I
30:13just going to invite you to think about
30:14what they're asking photons are the
30:17stuff this world is made of DNA is the
30:21stuff we're made of and they're asking
30:25scientists are asking in the laboratory
30:27does the St stuff we're made of have an
30:29effect on the stuff our world is made of
30:32this is where it starts to sound like
30:34science fiction or at least something
30:36that an advanced Yogi would be working
30:38with but these are in a Bonafide
30:41scientific laboratory these questions
30:44this is where they're being asked so
30:45here's what they did they took human DNA
30:49and they placed it inside the vessel and
30:52then they measured the DNA again to see
30:55what would happen and they measured the
30:57photons again to see what would happen
31:00and the results of this experiment
31:02change the way we have been conditioned
31:05to think about ourselves in the world
31:07because the photons went from being
31:09completely random when they were first
31:11measured and in the presence of the
31:13human DNA the photons are no longer
31:17random they are ordered they followed
31:21precisely the geometry of the DNA the
31:24DNA was having a direct effect on the
31:27phot phons the stuff we're made of is
31:30having a direct effect on the stuff our
31:33world is made of just like some of our
31:35most ancient and cherished indigenous
31:38and spiritual Traditions have always
31:39told us that we are connected to the
31:43world so this is the first experiment
31:46human DNA has a measurable effect on the
31:50stuff our world is made of now I want
31:51you to see why want you to see the way
31:53the scientists responded to this so I'm
31:55going to read this to you directly in
31:56the journal nanobi ology was published
31:58in
32:001995 the way the scientists describ this
32:03they said that the photons were
32:06described as behaving and this is a
32:08quote
32:09surprisingly and
32:12counterintuitively counterintuitively
32:15it's counterintuitive because the
32:17scientific thinking is that everything
32:19is separate from everything else and
32:20there is no stuff to convey any effect
32:24from the DNA to the matter that's why
32:26it's counterintuitive to the science but
32:28the next piece is where I find
32:30particularly interesting I'm going to
32:31invite you to listen to the language it
32:34says we are forced to accept the
32:38possibility they're saying that they are
32:40forced they're not saying it looks like
32:42or it appears or this is what we found
32:45they're saying we are forced to accept
32:47the possibility that some new field of
32:51energy is being excited by the
32:54DNA well I think we know it's not a new
32:56field it's a field that's been around a
32:58long time it's simply that we are just
33:01now recognizing that field and what it
33:04means to us so the summary of this
33:08second experiment is that Science Now
33:11confirms that human DNA influences the
33:15stuff our world is made of through the
33:17photons by communicating directly
33:20through the field that's a big piece but
33:24now let me go to the second
33:26experiment this experiment was published
33:28in the Journal of scientific exploration
33:31in
33:331994 it
33:35begins with human DNA once again and
33:39this is a very precise kind of human DNA
33:42it comes from umbilical cords of
33:46newborns because that DNA is what's
33:49called very pristine DNA it hasn't been
33:53eroded over time as happens as we mature
33:56in life so it's a very
33:58kind of DNA and the DNA is isolated in
34:03one vessel and that is encased in
34:05another vessel to make sure that there
34:08are no other influences that are are are
34:10happening from outside to influence the
34:13DNA so here is the experiment this very
34:18unique DNA is now placed within the
34:22range of the field of a human heart that
34:26we described in an earlier episode
34:28every human heart if you recall has a
34:30field of energy that extends beyond the
34:32physical heart for a distance between 5
34:35to 8 ft and that field it is an
34:38electrical and a magnetic field that we
34:41can measure with conventional equipment
34:43so the question is through that
34:46field is the DNA influenced by the
34:52emotions of another person can our
34:55emotions actually influence the DNA in
34:58our bodies before I tell you the
35:00experiment let me just share a little
35:01bit about why this is
35:03important human DNA when it is in our
35:07cells uh it is coiled in very specific
35:11kinds of ways and what scientists have
35:14found is that in the presence of certain
35:17emotions that we would call negative
35:20emotions and I don't really like to to
35:22use that term but I'm going to use it to
35:23be clear what we're talking about so
35:26when we talk about emotion
35:28for example of anger or hate or jealousy
35:31or rage or
35:32frustration those that we would
35:34typically consider as negative emotions
35:37they have an effect on the DNA within
35:39our bodies and and the effect is that in
35:43the presence of those emotions the DNA
35:45is actually the coil is tightened it's
35:48tightened like a a little knot and
35:50that's important because when it is
35:52tightened in this way the DNA does not
35:56express to its fullest capacity so the
35:59negative emotions tighten the coil and
36:02prevent the DNA from expressing uh the
36:05fullest capacity of whatever it is that
36:07it is expressing whether it's our immune
36:09response or anti-aging hormones or
36:11whatever it is the DNA simply cannot do
36:15uh its full complement of what it's
36:17designed to do so from this description
36:20you can probably imagine what the
36:21positive emotions do positive emotions
36:24actually loosen the DNA they relax the
36:28DNA so these are the emotions of
36:32compassion gratitude uh appreciation for
36:36example those kinds of emotions actually
36:39relax the DNA within our bodies and
36:42allow that fullest expression knowing
36:45this the scientists wanted to see what
36:48effect human emotion from one person
36:52would have a on DNA that's not in that
36:55person's body but it's in the special
36:57container that was designed so that's
36:59the experiment here's what they found
37:02the human DNA was
37:04isolated and in the presence of the
37:07positive emotions in the presence of the
37:09Gratitude appreciation love and
37:11compassion what happened was the DNA
37:14actually began to relax and it relaxed
37:18so much that it began to unwind itself
37:23the two coils began to unwind as if the
37:27DNA was about to replicate itself and
37:31produce a new strand of DNA in the
37:34presence of positive emotion all that
37:37was happening was gratitude appreciation
37:42care compassion and the DNA was
37:45responding in such a positive manner
37:48that the DNA acted again as if it was
37:51about to reproduce itself in a new
37:55vitalized healed state
37:58so this is something that scientists
38:00were not expecting so now we've seen the
38:03results of these two experiments in the
38:06presence of the positive emotion the DNA
38:08is relaxed in the presence of negative
38:12emotions such as anger hate jealousy
38:15rage the DNA was tightened like a little
38:18knot it coiled up very very tightly and
38:21this is telling the scientists something
38:24that we've never seen demonstrated under
38:27laboratory conditions before antidot it
38:30may have been suspected but this is the
38:32first time in a laboratory environment
38:36that we could actually see human emotion
38:40intentionally created by those trained
38:43to create very specific kinds and very
38:45specific qualities of emotion the human
38:48emotion changed the shape of the DNA it
38:52changed the ability of the DNA to fully
38:55Express the full comp compliment of what
38:58it is whatever that DNA is expressing so
39:00I'm going to share with you now directly
39:02I want you to hear from the scientists
39:04quote
39:05individuals trained in feelings of deep
39:08love and appreciation were able to
39:11intentionally change the shape of the
39:14DNA in their bodies and they went on to
39:17say that human emotion produces effects
39:22which
39:23defy conventional laws of physics now
39:26what are those saying to us it's saying
39:30that when we embrace the deepest truth
39:34the power that is available to us when
39:36we tap the fullest potential that we
39:39have available to us that we are not
39:41bound by the conventional laws of
39:44physics at least as we have known those
39:46laws in the past maybe the laws of
39:48physics are going to change but the fact
39:51that we have the ability to feel a
39:55certain way to create a certain emotion
39:57in our body body and literally change
39:59the DNA within us and in the case of the
40:02experiment that was not even part of us
40:05that tells a new story and here's what
40:08this story is All About so I'm going to
40:10invite you now think about these two
40:12experiments first experiment human
40:15emotion changes the shape of the DNA and
40:18you saw that the second experiment is
40:21that DNA changes physical matter the DNA
40:26influenced the photons that were in the
40:28vessel if you take out the middle piece
40:31human emotion changes DNA DNA changes
40:34matter if you take it out the
40:36overlapping statements of DNA what we
40:38find is this human emotion changes
40:41matter human emotion influences the
40:46stuff our world is made of and as we
40:49learn to embrace the qualities of
40:52feeling and emotion that change the DNA
40:56in our bodies not only does it influence
40:58the healing in our own bodies as you'll
40:59see in future episodes not only does it
41:02influence the DNA in additional ways as
41:05you're going to see in future episodes
41:07it literally Taps it influences the
41:10stuff our world is made of in ways that
41:13sound superum it sounds like something
41:15that a yogi studying in a monastery on a
41:18high mountain toop half a world away for
41:20a lifetime would be able to do but the
41:22beauty of these experiments is that we
41:24don't have to do that we don't have to
41:26leave everything that we love and all
41:28the people and the experiences that live
41:29in the monastery on a Mountaintop for a
41:31lifetime or two to embrace what these
41:34Technologies are all about and this is
41:36precisely what we are talking about this
41:38is a technology it is an internal
41:42technology that is available to every
41:45human if we choose to embrace it in our
41:48lives so what have we learned from these
41:51experiments we now know science confirms
41:54human emotion influences the field that
41:58connects all things and the stuff our
42:01world is made of when we study Physics
42:04traditional physics one of the great
42:06Mysteries uh of the physics as we know
42:09it today has to do with the outcome of
42:12yet another experiment this experiment
42:16was first performed in 1909 at the turn
42:19of the 20th century and at that time
42:22scientists they didn't know what to make
42:23of this experiment prior to 1909
42:27physics was mechanistic they're called
42:30Newtonian physics classical physics it
42:33was all about things bumping up against
42:35other things uh electrons and atoms and
42:39and neutrons but the new physics that
42:41was developing at the time through the
42:43theories that were being developed in
42:45late 1800s early
42:471900s that physics said that there's
42:49something else that's happening that on
42:51the level of things that are very small
42:53and the level of things that are very
42:55huge in terms of of galaxies and in
42:58terms of of very very small particles
43:02there's another physics that's working
43:04that's the quantum physics and the
43:06experiment that I'm talking about was
43:09known as the very very famous double
43:11slit experiment performed in
43:141909 and the Mystery is because the
43:18result of the double slit
43:20experiment actually is determined by
43:24whether or not someone is watching the
43:27experiment okay let me say that again
43:30let me tell you how this experiment
43:31works the double slit
43:33experiment it begins as a beam of
43:37photons and you see a common theme here
43:40we're talking about photons they are the
43:42elementary stuff that atoms are made of
43:45the stuff our world is made of you and I
43:47are made of photons our world is made of
43:49photons so it's not surprising that they
43:52would be used a lot throughout these
43:54experiments so in the double slit
43:56experiment
43:57a beam of light photons particles of
44:01light was fired from a
44:04device and it was fired at a barrier and
44:09the barrier had two slits on either side
44:13and what scientists expected to see was
44:16that once the light hit the barrier it
44:18would go through both of the slits and
44:22we would be able to see the patterns
44:24that was creating in a very expected way
44:27on the other side well this is where the
44:29mystery comes in because what scientists
44:32found is that when the light hit the
44:36barrier and it went
44:38through and it was being observed Now
44:42The Observer could be another human it
44:44could be a device watching it but
44:46somehow the
44:48observation actually determined how
44:52those particles of light would behave
44:55when no one and nothing was observing
44:58the particles would behave in one way
45:00when someone or a gadget was recording
45:04the particles would behave in another
45:06way and here's the difference under one
45:09set of circumstances the particles
45:11remain particles under another set of
45:12circumstances the particles became waves
45:16so now we're talking on a Quantum level
45:19about the difference between the
45:21particles and waves it's the same energy
45:23expressing in very very different forms
45:26now this is going to be really important
45:28because what we have just done is we've
45:31talked about the ability of humans to
45:34create the emotion it influences their
45:36DNA it influences the stuff our world is
45:39made of and now we're talking about the
45:42stuff our world is made of behaves
45:45differently sometimes it's a particle
45:47sometimes it's a wave depending on
45:48whether or not it's being observed the
45:51implications for healing the
45:54implications for prayer the
45:57implications for remote
46:00healing within the context of these
46:03discoveries take on a whole new meaning
46:06if you think about this uh we know
46:09scientifically that prayer has an effect
46:12uh many Studies have been done and the
46:14question was how could a prayer in one
46:17person's living room for their loved one
46:19their son or their daughter their mother
46:20father in a battlefield of Afghanistan
46:22half a world away how could the prayer
46:25have any influence
46:27on the other side of the planet and yet
46:29it does statistically what the studies
46:31were showing was that people fared
46:34better when they were ill or when they
46:36underwent a surgery those that had
46:38people praying for them fared better
46:40recovered faster had less trauma less
46:42bleeding less swelling less bruising
46:44than those that did not these are very
46:46very well documented studies so I'm not
46:48going to spend a lot of time on those
46:50the question is why does it happen how
46:52does it happen that's what we're
46:54spending time on because we're going to
46:55take this now to the Next Level we're
46:57going to take it even further than we
46:59have in the past because it begins to
47:01tie in to what we have called miracles
47:04in the past you know a miracle is only a
47:08miracle until we understand the science
47:10underlying what's happening then it
47:12becomes a technology and it's something
47:14that we all have available to
47:17us although the observer effect was
47:20first documented during the first double
47:22slit experiments early in the 20th
47:25century as happen so often with these
47:27very important experiments this
47:29particular experiment was repeated later
47:32in the century using even better
47:33equipment with new ideas and new
47:35understandings and I'd like to share
47:37with you precisely the exact language of
47:40what the scientists at the whitesman
47:42research institute discovered when they
47:44repeated the double slit experiment
47:481998 scientific headlines all over the
47:51world reported this experiment and they
47:53read and this is a quote researchers at
47:56the white Institute of science conducted
47:58a highly controlled experiment
48:01demonstrating how a beam of electrons so
48:04these are quantum particles a beam of
48:07electrons is affected by the act of
48:11being observed but even beyond that that
48:15observation effect that was noted early
48:18in the century but listen to this listen
48:20to the new portion of this
48:22discovery the scientist said quote the
48:25experiment revealed that the greater the
48:29amount of watching the greater the
48:32observer's influence on what actually
48:35takes place end of quote and this was
48:38actually reported in the very
48:39prestigious journal Nature uh February
48:4126 1998 volume 391 if you want to look
48:45it up for yourself this experiment is
48:48telling us that not only are we
48:51intimately IM mesed with the world
48:54around us and with the world within us
48:57but the more Focus the greater our Focus
49:00the greater the attention that we give
49:02specifically something that happening in
49:04our lives the greater the effect but I
49:07think this is interesting because we
49:08already knew this if we followed the
49:11principles and some of our most ancient
49:13again and cherished spiritual traditions
49:15for example in the Sutra from the
49:20Mahayana Buddhist Traditions there is a
49:23statement that essentially summarizes
49:25what the whitesman experience just told
49:28us and that statement says quote reality
49:31exists only where the mind creates a
49:35focus reality exists only where the mind
49:37creates a focus so the ancient Buddhist
49:40Traditions they didn't have the science
49:42but they sure understood the principle
49:43they understood the mechanism where we
49:46create this convergence of thought
49:49feeling and emotion where we create that
49:53Focus that is US observing the world
49:56around us and it is that experience and
50:00the fact that that experience has such a
50:03powerful effect in our lives that
50:05actually made Albert Einstein and was
50:07making him crazy this is the piece of
50:10the puzzle that Einstein was never able
50:13to solve he began early in the 20th
50:16century with his theories of Relativity
50:18and he was always searching for a
50:21unified theory a unified field Theory
50:25here's what I mean by that and unified
50:27field Theory it's where a scientist like
50:29Albert Einstein creates a single story
50:32that incorporates all of the facets of
50:36Nature and physics and Mathematics into
50:39one coherent story of us our universe
50:41and our relationship to it the unified
50:44field theory has been an elusive Theory
50:45it is yet to be discovered and Einstein
50:48in the world supported Einstein thinking
50:51that this is the man if anyone could do
50:52it he could do it here's where Einstein
50:54got stuck and he actually admitted that
50:56this on his deathbed in the early
50:581950s he got stuck because he did not
51:02like the idea that we are so intimately
51:05connected with our universe that we
51:08could have any influence whatsoever on
51:10the universe in one place without us
51:12being in in another place and as I
51:15mentioned earlier he actually had a name
51:17he called this uh spooky action at a
51:20distance he called this spooky action at
51:24a distance because to him it was spooky
51:27one of the things I find particularly
51:29fascinating uh is that although
51:33Einstein was working with the same
51:35mathematics and the same equations as
51:37his friends and colleagues he came to
51:40the conclusion that we are separate from
51:43one another and that we are separate
51:46from the universe and that we can be
51:48observers in the universe however a dear
51:51friend and colleague of Albert Einstein
51:54a man that lived much longer than
51:55Einstein uh and had tremendously
51:58powerful influence in quantum physics at
52:01Princeton University in our world today
52:03was professor John Wheeler he passed
52:05away just just a few years ago so John
52:08Wheeler and Albert Einstein they were
52:09friends they were colleagues looking at
52:11the same equations the same math drawing
52:13vastly different conclusions so while
52:17Einstein believed that we were separate
52:19and have no effect wheeler said just the
52:22opposite I want to share with you John
52:24Wheeler's exact words just just so you
52:26you you can hear his process and his
52:29thinking and how passionate he was about
52:31this John Wheeler said we had this old
52:36idea that there is a universe out there
52:40somewhere and here's man he called The
52:43Observer safely protected from the
52:47universe by what he called a 6in slab of
52:50plate glass okay so it's not really
52:53plate glass but that is his way of
52:55saying that there is something between
52:58us in the universe out there but he
53:00continues he said now we learn that to
53:03even observe an electron we have to
53:06shatter that plate glass listen to what
53:08he said he said so the old word Observer
53:12simply has to be crossed off the books
53:15he said there are no observers we must
53:17put in the new word participator no
53:20observers only participators so what
53:23does this mean I'm going to just just
53:25very very quickly
53:27encapsulate this idea why it's so
53:29powerful in our lives because what John
53:32Wheeler has just said to us tells us
53:35that we will never find the smallest
53:37particle of matter no matter how many
53:40atoms and Quantum particles that we
53:42smash into one another and break into
53:44bajillion pieces looking for smaller and
53:45smaller pieces and we will never find
53:48the edge of the universe no matter how
53:50far we look to the edge of the cosmos
53:53and how technologically sophisticated
53:55our equipment is and here's the reason
53:57why what John wether just said to us is
54:00that every place that we look into the
54:06universe every place that we look into
54:08nature with the expectation that
54:11something is there for us to see the
54:14expectation is the principle that will
54:16put something there for us to see so no
54:19matter how far no matter how deep as
54:22long as we're looking the act of looking
54:25is the act of creation
54:26that makes sure there will always be
54:28something there for us to
54:30see so what we've just witnessed are the
54:34science-based experiments and a real
54:36life application of these experiments
54:38that not only confirm that we are deeply
54:41connected to the world but also confirm
54:44that that connection is so fundamental
54:47it begins at the very core of our
54:49existence with our DNA where we interact
54:52with life and reality itself

About this transcript

This page contains the full transcript of God's Secret Code Hidden in Your DNA | Gregg Braden by Gregg Braden Official, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 8,839 words across 1,271 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.

What you can do with it

Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to choose a caption track available on the video.

Free YouTube transcript tool

YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, caption language selection, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.