YouTube2Text

ESG Challenge: Anne Perrault, Public Citizen Interview — Transcript

by Alliance for Responsible Capitalism · 3,394 words · 516 segments · language en · Watch on YouTube

Full transcript

  1. 0:05hi an thank you so much for taking the
  2. 0:07time to connect with me today um could
  3. 0:10you please introduce yourself and your
  4. 0:12work in climate Finance policy at public
  5. 0:14citizen sure hi it's a pleasure to be
  6. 0:17here um an pero I uh work primarily on
  7. 0:21Bank regulation and um Financial
  8. 0:25stability issues at public citizen uh
  9. 0:28which is based primarily Washington DC
  10. 0:30but office is in Austin Texas as
  11. 0:35well great climate change poses physical
  12. 0:39risks and transition risks to individual
  13. 0:42institutions how do you articulate the
  14. 0:44systemic risks of climate change to the
  15. 0:46broader Financial system in the US yeah
  16. 0:50so that's received a lot more attention
  17. 0:52in the past couple of years and the um
  18. 0:56Financial stability oversight Council
  19. 0:59fso which which is chaired by the US
  20. 1:01Treasury um produced in 2022 and 2023
  21. 1:06well they always produce annual reports
  22. 1:08but the two they produced in those two
  23. 1:10years did a pretty good job of
  24. 1:12describing oneway climate change is
  25. 1:17creating a possible Financial stability
  26. 1:20risks and what's described in those
  27. 1:22reports is this um what we're seeing now
  28. 1:25in beginning with the insurance Market
  29. 1:28um so it's the whole
  30. 1:30um you know when insurers begin to leave
  31. 1:34risks flow uh it's called a flow of risk
  32. 1:37to Consumers when consumers um when it
  33. 1:41exceeds consumer capacity to pay say
  34. 1:44mortgage loans um you have lenders on
  35. 1:47the hook both Bank lenders and non-bank
  36. 1:50lenders and but also municipalities and
  37. 1:54we're seeing that with Helen the
  38. 1:55hurricane here we can only imagine um
  39. 1:59what the municip alties that are that
  40. 2:01will need to deal with the aftermath of
  41. 2:03of hen will need to deal with when it
  42. 2:05when it comes to paying their debt and
  43. 2:07their municipal bonds and so um in in
  44. 2:11fact there have been recent Studies by
  45. 2:13the um uh inter um Continental exchange
  46. 2:16that
  47. 2:17approximately four trillion I think is
  48. 2:20the correct number in municipal bonds um
  49. 2:23are issued from areas that face
  50. 2:26significant physical risks so um
  51. 2:30so it's municipalities as well but then
  52. 2:33we also have a lot of uh mortgage
  53. 2:36Originators of course selling those
  54. 2:39those mortgages to government sponsored
  55. 2:41Enterprises Fanny and Freddy sounds a
  56. 2:43lot like 2008 um and a lot of those uh
  57. 2:48uh mortgages uh the risks climate risks
  58. 2:50associated with them aren't clear and of
  59. 2:53course they're being securitized and and
  60. 2:56investors are purchasing them and we see
  61. 2:58the 2008 finan financial crisis and uh
  62. 3:01an analogy here so that's one way
  63. 3:05there's a financial stability risk
  64. 3:07through this loss of insurance and and
  65. 3:10heightened physical um physical impacts
  66. 3:14that's one um others that we're thinking
  67. 3:18about and working on are um heightened
  68. 3:21inequality and of course it it relates
  69. 3:24to to the physical impacts um to what
  70. 3:27extent is heightened inequality that's
  71. 3:29caused for example by insurers departing
  72. 3:32from um areas that are
  73. 3:35disproportionately you know um home to
  74. 3:38um low and moderate income communities
  75. 3:40what's going to happen uh to to
  76. 3:43inequality there so we're thinking that
  77. 3:45heightened inequality could be a concern
  78. 3:48and then of course just impacts to the E
  79. 3:50economy we're seeing a greater attention
  80. 3:53to how impacts to supply chains um might
  81. 3:58uh you know down Road pose a threat to
  82. 4:01financial stability um and then of
  83. 4:04course there's the one that Financial
  84. 4:06Regulators have already probably given
  85. 4:09the most attention to which is um just
  86. 4:12the risks of material distress or
  87. 4:15failure of the largest financial
  88. 4:18institutions the largest banks for
  89. 4:20example and and I um we can talk more
  90. 4:24about that but that's that's really
  91. 4:26where most of reg most of the regulator
  92. 4:28attention has been Focus today because
  93. 4:31it's what they know um and climate risk
  94. 4:34is is a Rel is kind of a novel risk in
  95. 4:37many ways so so yeah that's how I'm
  96. 4:40seeing Financial stability risks from
  97. 4:43climate change
  98. 4:46multifaceted yeah the public citizen
  99. 4:50called for a climate road map for US
  100. 4:52Financial regulation at the beginning of
  101. 4:54the Biden Administration um which called
  102. 4:57for reforms such as expanding disclosure
  103. 4:59requirements expanded fiduciary rights
  104. 5:02to address climate risks actively
  105. 5:04regulating climate um risks opposed to
  106. 5:08the financial system and supporting
  107. 5:10research to better quantify climate
  108. 5:12risks uh at now at the end of Biden's
  109. 5:14term what gaps remain and what which
  110. 5:17ones are the most urgent to address yeah
  111. 5:20so as I mentioned a second ago I think
  112. 5:24Regulators primarily Bank Regulators
  113. 5:27have done a decent job of responding
  114. 5:30to I say decent but you know relative
  115. 5:35um Le let's put it this way of of taking
  116. 5:40steps to deal with risks that the
  117. 5:43largest banks face so they adopted
  118. 5:48supervisory guidance climate related um
  119. 5:51for to deal with climate related
  120. 5:53Financial Risk that Bank of America
  121. 5:54faces hate Bank of America you need to
  122. 5:57think about climate risk you need to
  123. 5:58think about ways you to respond to it
  124. 6:01that that sort of
  125. 6:03thing what Regulators haven't done as
  126. 6:06much um well really at all is to think
  127. 6:10about ways those same institutions are
  128. 6:14contributing to risk to the system um
  129. 6:18through their financed emissions or
  130. 6:20facilitated emissions so um you know to
  131. 6:25what extent will the flooding um and and
  132. 6:29and North Carolina impact Bank of
  133. 6:33America relative to a whole range of of
  134. 6:37financial actors as I mentioned earlier
  135. 6:41municipalities you know other Financial
  136. 6:43actors that are more geographically
  137. 6:47rooted than say Bank of America that
  138. 6:50have greater Financial capacity than say
  139. 6:53Bank of America to respond to those
  140. 6:55risks um it's uh those are the sorts of
  141. 6:59questions and and issues we've been
  142. 7:01pushing Regulators to consider and
  143. 7:05respond to um in the US and I'll say on
  144. 7:09that point that it's really interesting
  145. 7:11because in Europe um the European
  146. 7:13Central Bank has done a a much better
  147. 7:15job of of considering this issue of not
  148. 7:20just
  149. 7:21um risk to the largest banks but also
  150. 7:25risk that those Banks and other
  151. 7:27financial institutions are creating for
  152. 7:30other Financial actors in our extremely
  153. 7:33interconnected Financial system so
  154. 7:37that's a a major shortcoming from from
  155. 7:40my
  156. 7:41perspective other shortcomings are on
  157. 7:44their radar I think but they're still
  158. 7:46not struggling with how to deal with
  159. 7:48that and that of course is non-bank
  160. 7:50lenders with other actors of Shadow and
  161. 7:54you know the shadow banking system what
  162. 7:56do you do with with asset managers you
  163. 7:59know um private Equity um actors um even
  164. 8:05insurers as as you might know insurers
  165. 8:08are regulated primarily at the state
  166. 8:10level not at the federal level and so
  167. 8:13we've got this situation where um you
  168. 8:16know Financial Regulators are even if
  169. 8:19they're considering that um insure
  170. 8:22departures and the insurance protection
  171. 8:24Gap that's growing it's Financial
  172. 8:27stability concern they're struggling to
  173. 8:29figure what do we do about that you know
  174. 8:31we've got some efforts by the National
  175. 8:35Association of insurance Commissioners
  176. 8:37um that are you know trying to secure
  177. 8:40information about risks um to ensures
  178. 8:44how much you know what other premiums
  179. 8:47insurers are charging in various States
  180. 8:49but we have a handful of states that
  181. 8:51aren't participating so it's really a
  182. 8:54struggle really a tough issue um and
  183. 8:57then disclosure um is is a big concern
  184. 9:00and you know the SEC under under Gary
  185. 9:04Gensler has offered a proposal to um you
  186. 9:08know disclose scope one two and three um
  187. 9:12um emissions and and scope three has now
  188. 9:15fallen off the radar um that's that's a
  189. 9:19key a key concern um that's a key
  190. 9:23shortcoming so uh we've got the state of
  191. 9:27California still requiring it we're
  192. 9:29hopeing that creates a lot of momentum
  193. 9:32we we know that it covers a lot of the
  194. 9:34actors that would have been covered
  195. 9:36under SC the public citizen did a study
  196. 9:40to to show the overlap um I don't have
  197. 9:43the numbers in my head I I didn't do the
  198. 9:44study but
  199. 9:46um yeah those are some of the
  200. 9:51shortcomings public citizen has also
  201. 9:53supported the fossil free finance act
  202. 9:55which includes Provisions to stop Banks
  203. 9:57from lending to fossil fuel projects
  204. 10:00I've heard two main arguments against
  205. 10:01simply turning off the tap of
  206. 10:03Investments to fossil fuel projects
  207. 10:05first you risk driving them to less
  208. 10:08reputable and transparent sources of
  209. 10:10funding and second actively engaging
  210. 10:13heavy emitters to decarbonize their
  211. 10:14operations will ensure we reduce
  212. 10:17emissions in the real economy not just
  213. 10:18on the books of a given Bank how do you
  214. 10:22respond to these
  215. 10:23arguments yeah um well on the
  216. 10:27first um you know
  217. 10:30it's it's you you can't stop asking
  218. 10:35actors that are creating risk that
  219. 10:37others are assuming to you can't just
  220. 10:40ignore what they're doing assuming that
  221. 10:43those you know those risks will just
  222. 10:45move somewhere else you you've got to
  223. 10:47start
  224. 10:48somewhere I'll also say that public
  225. 10:50citizen
  226. 10:51were pushing to to secure greater
  227. 10:55attention to non-bank actors too um so
  228. 10:58for example we just requested that
  229. 11:02treasury um designate um AIG as a you
  230. 11:06know significant um um a cppi
  231. 11:10International International financial
  232. 11:13institution um to require greater
  233. 11:16Federal Reserve board over you know
  234. 11:19supervision and regulation so we're well
  235. 11:22aware that there are risks um and in the
  236. 11:25shadow banking system that need to be
  237. 11:28addressed and push for that um and your
  238. 11:32second question again sorry the yeah the
  239. 11:35second argument was um so fuss-free
  240. 11:38Finance act actually wants to withdraw
  241. 11:42funding or limit the amount of funding
  242. 11:45that Banks can provide to these
  243. 11:47institutions which is more of a
  244. 11:49divestment argument as opposed to an
  245. 11:51active engagement in decarbonization
  246. 11:53argument so um what's how what do you
  247. 11:57see is the benefit of the this active
  248. 12:00divestment as opposed to uh the approach
  249. 12:04that I've also heard articulated of
  250. 12:07engaging with the heavy emitters to
  251. 12:09reduce their their emissions in the real
  252. 12:13economy yeah so a couple of things the
  253. 12:16house fre Finance
  254. 12:18Act is not calling for immediate
  255. 12:22investment and that needs to be really
  256. 12:24clear it is about taking a
  257. 12:27responsible um
  258. 12:30uh um approach um one over over years to
  259. 12:35transitioning out of out of fossil
  260. 12:37assets so
  261. 12:39we're I I think we're I I know we're
  262. 12:42very aware that u a quick departure is
  263. 12:47not is not a prudent thing to do um that
  264. 12:52said we waited so long to transition out
  265. 12:56that now we've uh started to feel the
  266. 12:59pain um and you know and we're seeing it
  267. 13:02with this you know increased flooding
  268. 13:04right now
  269. 13:06um you know if we had started five to 10
  270. 13:09years ago we we probably could you know
  271. 13:12be making this transition a lot easier
  272. 13:15than it than it is now at this point so
  273. 13:19uh that's I guess that's one response
  274. 13:22the other is
  275. 13:24um it needs to be both I think it needs
  276. 13:27to be um divestment it also o needs to
  277. 13:29be Banks engaging with clients that said
  278. 13:33um you know there's been real questions
  279. 13:36important questions about the extent to
  280. 13:38which banks truly are engaging with
  281. 13:42clients to do this and um uh you know
  282. 13:47what we're seeing and reading is that
  283. 13:50you know Banks would like to suggest and
  284. 13:53indicate that they are working closely
  285. 13:56with clients to make this move to
  286. 13:58transition but the evidence of that is
  287. 14:00still pretty sparse and so yeah if you
  288. 14:04know please engage with your clients um
  289. 14:07but in the meantime we're also going to
  290. 14:09push for banks to reduce their financing
  291. 14:12of emissions because it it needs to
  292. 14:16happen great um how have you seen
  293. 14:20companies in general and in particular
  294. 14:23financial institutions engaging on the
  295. 14:26financial regulations that that you
  296. 14:28support those gaps in the regulatory
  297. 14:31landscape that you talked about earlier
  298. 14:33and how influential is the corporate
  299. 14:35voice in developing these policies yeah
  300. 14:41um I I it's yeah it's very influential
  301. 14:46it's it's um again I think about Banks
  302. 14:50and it's we have some banks that we that
  303. 14:54are value aligned I guess um Amalgamated
  304. 14:58Bank comes to to mind um um and Banks
  305. 15:02like Amalgamated that are doing what
  306. 15:05they can to move the Needle and to
  307. 15:08engage other Banks frankly um but there
  308. 15:11aren't enough and so on a call recently
  309. 15:16with um was uh about comments on a on a
  310. 15:21on a global proposal to to to deal with
  311. 15:24climate risk there were three of us from
  312. 15:27um um non profit groups and 100 uh from
  313. 15:32financial
  314. 15:34institutions and the message in that um
  315. 15:38and that convening was look we're big
  316. 15:41financial
  317. 15:44institutions we we've got these risks
  318. 15:48covered um we don't think the transition
  319. 15:51risks are that great for us and and the
  320. 15:54implication there is we've got we we we
  321. 15:57have these fossil assets
  322. 15:59but we we can get rid of them before it
  323. 16:01becomes a really big deal um so you
  324. 16:04don't need to worry about us the largest
  325. 16:06financial institutions and when it comes
  326. 16:09to physical risks well we we we know how
  327. 16:13to stop lending and financing in climate
  328. 16:15vulnerable areas at least that's what
  329. 16:17they were saying you know six months ago
  330. 16:19on that call now that it's becoming more
  331. 16:23obvious that there are
  332. 16:25no perfectly safe areas when you think
  333. 16:28about on Asheville for example that that
  334. 16:31tune might change in other words maybe
  335. 16:33larger banks will realize well wow we
  336. 16:36thought we had investments in safe
  337. 16:38places we may now need to rethink that
  338. 16:41but
  339. 16:43um but on this call we're the largest
  340. 16:46financial institutions and their their
  341. 16:49their plea was look you don't need to
  342. 16:51regulate us anymore risks to us are
  343. 16:54covered so Bank Regulators you've done
  344. 16:58your job
  345. 16:59we'll be safe we won't face material
  346. 17:02distress the three of us on the call
  347. 17:04that weren't you know financial
  348. 17:06institution said wait you know you might
  349. 17:10be um one though the risk you're
  350. 17:15creating through your financing and
  351. 17:17facilitating of emissions aren't going
  352. 17:19away they're falling on other entities
  353. 17:23they're falling on consumers they're
  354. 17:24falling on communities and those are
  355. 17:27things you need to pay attention to and
  356. 17:30that frankly Regulators need to pay
  357. 17:32attention to for all the reasons I
  358. 17:33mentioned before heightened inequality
  359. 17:35flow of risk all of that
  360. 17:39um uh um but
  361. 17:43two again thinking back to 2008 we could
  362. 17:47have a financial crisis here and you
  363. 17:50know all bets are off for even large
  364. 17:53financial
  365. 17:54institutions that are so heavily um
  366. 17:57interconnected
  367. 17:59um that you'll be okay so maybe maybe
  368. 18:02risk you're you are facing individual
  369. 18:05financial institutions right now direct
  370. 18:08risk to you right now maybe you're right
  371. 18:12you know even assuming you're right
  372. 18:14about that um the risk that others are
  373. 18:18assuming um uh the risks that um you
  374. 18:21could face through a financial crisis
  375. 18:24are other risks that you need to be
  376. 18:26worried about that Regulators need to be
  377. 18:28worried about so that's what I would say
  378. 18:31in response to that
  379. 18:34absolutely what are the primary
  380. 18:36arguments that you hear against the
  381. 18:39kinds of proposed Finance regulations
  382. 18:41that you advocate for and how do you
  383. 18:43address them I think you just mentioned
  384. 18:45some of them banks have this under
  385. 18:48control but what are the other ones that
  386. 18:49you are
  387. 18:51hearing yeah uh it's hard to
  388. 18:55quantify um so the I the FED did a pilot
  389. 19:01scenario analysis of I think it was the
  390. 19:04six largest banks as these largest banks
  391. 19:07to um walk through a few hypotheticals
  392. 19:12what happens if a hurricane hits the the
  393. 19:16Northeast Coast what would that do to
  394. 19:18your
  395. 19:19portfolio how would you handle that um
  396. 19:22that was one of the hypotheticals and
  397. 19:24then there were a few other other
  398. 19:27factors Banks needed to to consider um
  399. 19:30these six largest banks
  400. 19:33um performed the exercise sent the
  401. 19:36results to the FED actually One Bank um
  402. 19:40we found a footnote that said one
  403. 19:43couldn't secure all the data it needed
  404. 19:45to do to do the exercise which was
  405. 19:47really interesting because this is a
  406. 19:49large large bank so the six largest
  407. 19:52Banks sent in that data and um the FED
  408. 19:57report said essentially we got a lot of
  409. 19:59gaps here folks we've got a lot of um um
  410. 20:03modeling um U um uncertainty um and we
  411. 20:09need to do a lot of work to fill those
  412. 20:12gaps and I I think this really
  413. 20:15underscores a point we make a lot um
  414. 20:18that I made earlier which is climate
  415. 20:21risk isn't
  416. 20:23your parents Financial Risk it's not
  417. 20:26your grandparents Financial Risk it's it
  418. 20:29is a Financial Risk but it's a different
  419. 20:31kind of Financial Risk it's one rooted
  420. 20:34and impacts to the environment and the
  421. 20:37idea that we can somehow create this
  422. 20:39really really deep distinction between
  423. 20:42environmental health and financial
  424. 20:44system Health you know this the climate
  425. 20:47change impacts we seen just highlights
  426. 20:50how untrue that is and so what it means
  427. 20:55then is that the bank regulators and
  428. 20:58other regul
  429. 20:59need to think more broadly about
  430. 21:02riskmanagement measures that need to be
  431. 21:04pursued they also need to think about um
  432. 21:07who are the important critical Financial
  433. 21:11actors now um you could pretend that
  434. 21:16municipalities for example weren't as
  435. 21:18important Financial actors uh you know
  436. 21:20five to 10 years ago they're
  437. 21:22municipalities they're public entities
  438. 21:24they're not part of our game um well you
  439. 21:27know with um four trillion in municipal
  440. 21:30bonds outstanding in climate vulnerable
  441. 21:33areas they are part of your game and you
  442. 21:35need to think about their well-being and
  443. 21:37you need to think about the fact that
  444. 21:40municipalities are assuming risk they
  445. 21:42didn't create that didn't willingly
  446. 21:43assume in some ways you know unlike the
  447. 21:472008 financial crisis where a lot of
  448. 21:49folks acted to assume those risks didn't
  449. 21:52have all the information totally
  450. 21:54understand that but in this situation
  451. 21:56you've got you know the folks who who
  452. 22:00have homes that were just washed away in
  453. 22:02Asheville you know they didn't willingly
  454. 22:05assume the risk that they are now facing
  455. 22:08here um so Regulators need to need to
  456. 22:13consider that as du the financial
  457. 22:18institutions how has the anti-g backlash
  458. 22:21affected your work and what has been the
  459. 22:23effect on the broader regulatory
  460. 22:26landscape so um um The anti-g Campaign
  461. 22:34there's an entire group of Advocates who
  462. 22:36are focusing on that and I'm I'm not one
  463. 22:39of those um but of
  464. 22:42course uh I'm following it from afar uh
  465. 22:46because it's hugely important
  466. 22:50um I it it of of course is having a
  467. 22:54significant impact on the work we're
  468. 22:55doing we're seeing regulators
  469. 22:58Powell
  470. 23:00um uh you know a few years ago was
  471. 23:06less you know reticent to acknowledge
  472. 23:10climate as a as a risk than he is today
  473. 23:14partly I think because of the anti-g
  474. 23:17backlash because of political concerns
  475. 23:19related to that I think one of the
  476. 23:22reasons for the big gap between what's
  477. 23:25happening in Europe at the ECB for
  478. 23:27example European Central Bank and what's
  479. 23:29happening at the FED is partly a
  480. 23:32function of the
  481. 23:35anti-g uh campaign in the US that said I
  482. 23:40think what started as sort of a a war is
  483. 23:44is turning into more like a meow um
  484. 23:48maybe that's wishful thinking I'll
  485. 23:50acknowledge it might be wishful thinking
  486. 23:51but the point here is we're seeing that
  487. 23:54it's costing these states um who are are
  488. 23:58so strongly pushing you know anti ESG
  489. 24:03one of the best things
  490. 24:04are campaign to respond to anti-g has
  491. 24:08done is to put numbers on um the cost
  492. 24:13that um the anti-g states or counties or
  493. 24:17jurisdictions you know what what is
  494. 24:20costing them to take that position given
  495. 24:23the risk given the harms given the cost
  496. 24:26that their consumers their community
  497. 24:29their you know public entities are are
  498. 24:32are facing so yeah it's it's been tough
  499. 24:36and more to do more to
  500. 24:40go is there anything else that you would
  501. 24:42like to add or any other points you
  502. 24:45would like to make before we
  503. 24:48wrap
  504. 24:51uh yeah I
  505. 24:53think we're seeing greater interest in
  506. 24:56this issue um
  507. 25:00by business community members who who
  508. 25:04get that this is a growing risk it's not
  509. 25:07going away and it's important
  510. 25:10for not only Our Generation uh but
  511. 25:14obviously future generations and their
  512. 25:16financial well-being and so um super
  513. 25:20happy to to be engaged in this super
  514. 25:22happy you're doing it and um yeah i' say
  515. 25:25that's about it for me but thank you
  516. 25:28thank you so much an yeah

About this transcript

This page contains the full transcript of ESG Challenge: Anne Perrault, Public Citizen Interview by Alliance for Responsible Capitalism, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 3,394 words across 516 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.

What you can do with it

Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to choose a caption track available on the video.

Free YouTube transcript tool

YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, caption language selection, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.