YouTube2Text

Entrevista a Eugène Ionesco, Dramaturgo (1981) | Ricardo Rocha — Transcript

by Rocha Informa · 1,223 words · 188 segments · language en · Watch on YouTube

Full transcript

  1. 0:05Eugene Ionesco. Today, in memory of the
  2. 0:08great master of the stage, we will
  3. 0:10bring back from oblivion an interview
  4. 0:12we held with him some years ago. First,
  5. 0:16a portrait of the theater master,
  6. 0:19Eugene Ionesco, a Romanian who has
  7. 0:22lived in France for 56 years. The
  8. 0:26phrase seems to correspond to a
  9. 0:27restrained way of speaking about the
  10. 0:29dead. who are occasionally magnified to
  11. 0:32excess. But in the case of this
  12. 0:35playwright, every praise is deserved,
  13. 0:37since, like no one else, he knew how to
  14. 0:40be a chronicler of our time; to record,
  15. 0:42with efficiency, sarcasm, and charm,
  16. 0:44the void brought on by the anonymous
  17. 0:46life of cities, the intrinsic
  18. 0:48loneliness of living in a crowd, and,
  19. 0:50above all, the surrealism of the daily
  20. 0:52absurd. Ionesco, in short,
  21. 0:56revolutionized contemporary theater
  22. 0:58with works as recognized today as The
  23. 1:00Bald Soprano, perhaps one of the most
  24. 1:02performed plays in theater history, as
  25. 1:04in France alone it has reached a run of
  26. 1:0725,000 performances. But it was not the
  27. 1:11only one to attract the world's
  28. 1:13attention and give Ionesco the relevant
  29. 1:15place he deserves in theater, since
  30. 1:17other works also appear today as
  31. 1:19masterpieces of contemporary dramaturgy
  32. 1:21, such as The Chairs, a harsh plea
  33. 1:23against transcendence, solemnity, and
  34. 1:26loneliness. The Lesson, which forced a
  35. 1:30revision of pedagogical forms;
  36. 1:31Rhinoceros, which is a song to
  37. 1:33individual freedom and a protest
  38. 1:35against totalitarianism, as well as
  39. 1:37some other pieces. However, these were
  40. 1:41not his only works, nor was theater his
  41. 1:44only means of expression, as he also
  42. 1:47wrote a novel. Doctor Honoris Causa
  43. 1:51from various universities, among which
  44. 1:53New York, Louvain, and Tel Aviv stand
  45. 1:55out, he received the Grand Prix for
  46. 1:57Theater and the European Prize for
  47. 1:58Literature. He was also a Knight of the
  48. 2:02Legion of Honor and a member of the
  49. 2:03French Academy. We had the privilege of
  50. 2:07interviewing him, and today we
  51. 2:09rebroadcast the words and gestures of
  52. 2:11this exceptional theater artist as a
  53. 2:14modest but warm and sincere tribute.
  54. 2:21Ionesco is one of the men who has most
  55. 2:24influenced the thinking of young people
  56. 2:28, especially in the second half of this
  57. 2:32century and particularly among those
  58. 2:35who have used art as a form of
  59. 2:38expression. Mr. Ionesco, with the
  60. 2:42perspective of all these years of
  61. 2:48Ionesco on perhaps of the absurd
  62. 3:07because to talk about the absurd, one
  63. 3:14must know the model of what is not
  64. 3:18absurd. So, I cannot say of this
  65. 3:27theater that it is absurd, nor that it
  66. 3:35is not absurd. In any case, it is
  67. 3:40called, this theater is called absurd.
  68. 3:45This label was given by an English
  69. 3:52critic, Martin Esslin, who is a who is
  70. 4:02an excellent friend and who was the
  71. 4:07first to notice that this theater was
  72. 4:14different from the theater usually
  73. 4:19played on the world's stages. Uh, he
  74. 4:26called it the theater of the absurd
  75. 4:28because it was the era when people
  76. 4:32talked a lot about the absurd. around
  77. 4:361950, we talked about the absurd
  78. 4:42regarding Sartre, Bataille, Camus. That
  79. 4:49is to say, I believe I understand that
  80. 4:53this absurd we speak of is the sign of
  81. 5:00the fact that we do not fit into the
  82. 5:05world. We have the impression that the
  83. 5:12world is not made for us and that we
  84. 5:18are not made for the world. For
  85. 5:21centuries, revolutions have followed
  86. 5:26one another, societies have succeeded
  87. 5:31one another after upheavals. Each
  88. 5:38revolution has come about to establish
  89. 5:46justice, liberty, fraternity, equality
  90. 5:56and the revolutionaries only succeeded
  91. 6:00in establishing castes that were
  92. 6:06super-privileged. in place of justice,
  93. 6:10tyranny and vengeance in place of
  94. 6:20fraternity, the most intense hatred. At
  95. 6:28this moment, after centuries of
  96. 6:32revolution, the whole world is in an
  97. 6:39indescribable state of irrationality,
  98. 6:46of contradiction, of slaughter. I
  99. 6:52repeat what I have said several times.
  100. 6:58Love one another? That translates into
  101. 7:03the facts as distrust one another, kill
  102. 7:11one another, devour one another. It is
  103. 7:17useless to look for any reasons because
  104. 7:22that and for explanations in sociology
  105. 7:29or in any other philosophy or even in
  106. 7:33theologies is useless. The facts are
  107. 7:43there, brutal. And the truth of our
  108. 7:51desires is evident in Ionesco, what you
  109. 8:01say is brutal, very terrible. If man
  110. 8:08does not find his answers in his
  111. 8:12reality, then he will find his answers
  112. 8:18in fantasy, in philosophy, in religion.
  113. 8:27All these paths are personally closed
  114. 8:30to me and I believe they are also
  115. 8:39closed in truth to everyone. The
  116. 8:51imagination or fantasy, as you say,
  117. 8:56cannot provide any answer. It can only
  118. 9:04show with even more evidence the
  119. 9:10inadmissibility of the condition in
  120. 9:12which we find ourselves. Moreover, now
  121. 9:19it is useless to look for anything at
  122. 9:24all in the imagination because the
  123. 9:29imagination is surpassed by the by the
  124. 9:36atrocious reality. What is the future
  125. 9:39then that you see, Ionesco? Is it an
  126. 9:45apocalyptic future or do you not
  127. 9:48believe man can overcome his state of I
  128. 9:54believe we live in a world where the
  129. 9:59apocalypse is occurring in its most
  130. 10:05brutal form because we have lived in
  131. 10:11the apocalypse all the time. But now,
  132. 10:16it is reaching its most violent point.
  133. 10:27Uh, it was, moreover, predicted and the
  134. 10:33reason why I think I can still believe
  135. 10:36in religion, it is that it was foreseen
  136. 10:45in the gospels and in the Bible uh to
  137. 10:54provide an answer to the questions. We
  138. 11:02must wait for the end of times. Perhaps
  139. 11:07then we will have some kind of answer
  140. 11:16unless everything is, as Martine
  141. 11:18Nessine said, just absurd and that
  142. 11:26perhaps the human adventure has lasted
  143. 11:29long enough and it is time for it to
  144. 11:35end. place is the place of the smile,
  145. 11:51of love
  146. 11:53of the good will to solve the problems.
  147. 12:00Indeed, it is only charity that can
  148. 12:06help to prevent the exploitation of man
  149. 12:11by man, the homicides, the idiotic
  150. 12:17hegemonies that we see developing at
  151. 12:25this moment. Empires replace other
  152. 12:30empires
  153. 12:34and all empires collapse one after the
  154. 12:36other. The empire itself is threatened
  155. 12:41with collapse. I do not see a solution
  156. 12:50for it. I cannot answer anything else.
  157. 12:59Uh and no one can answer, except
  158. 13:02perhaps a mystic. But the mystic can
  159. 13:09only answer to themselves because the
  160. 13:14mystical experience is incommunicable.
  161. 13:18It seems to me that you are very modest
  162. 13:24and that in the bottom of your heart
  163. 13:29there is a great hope for the future
  164. 13:37but I do not know. Finally, he touched
  165. 13:44on the topic of theater. it is the
  166. 13:50future of theater especially thinking
  167. 13:54about the social responsibility of it
  168. 14:02is better that writers and artists do
  169. 14:09not concern themselves with social
  170. 14:11responsibility that they especially do
  171. 14:16not try to save the world. Those who
  172. 14:20want to save the world have made it
  173. 14:25even more violent. The usefulness of
  174. 14:34the work of art and its uselessness.
  175. 14:40But the uselessness is indispensable.
  176. 14:46It must teach people again to forget
  177. 14:52the excess of politics. Mr. Ionesco, I
  178. 15:00have a terrible suspicion that the
  179. 15:05smile, the laughter is the hope that is
  180. 15:12kept in the bottom of the heart. of it
  181. 15:21laughter as an instrument to live a
  182. 15:26life you understand he will start again
  183. 15:40of course is not in this world. The
  184. 15:47creation is perhaps a failure and he
  185. 15:53hopes for another manifestation of
  186. 15:58divinity, another universe, another
  187. 16:05planet, that is not enough, but another
  188. 16:10universe, another creation.

About this transcript

This page contains the full transcript of Entrevista a Eugène Ionesco, Dramaturgo (1981) | Ricardo Rocha by Rocha Informa, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 1,223 words across 188 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.

What you can do with it

Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to choose a caption track available on the video.

Free YouTube transcript tool

YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, caption language selection, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.