Eleições no Brasil | Como funciona o Sistema Eleitoral? — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00To start off, it is important to
- 0:02understand what elections are. And an
- 0:05election is nothing more than a
- 0:07selection process where you, along with
- 0:10all other people who have the right to
- 0:13choose (called voters), actually go to
- 0:15the polls to vote for your
- 0:17representatives, who are simply
- 0:19candidates intended to represent the
- 0:22popular will. Elections can happen
- 0:25anywhere, from a student council or a
- 0:27condo board, to the presidency of the
- 0:30Republic of Brazil. And that is what we
- 0:32are discussing here, because we are on
- 0:34the eve of an election and we need to
- 0:36understand how this process works. In
- 0:39the case of Brazil, which is a
- 0:41presidential republic, we have the
- 0:44highest executive office as the
- 0:46President of the Republic, who is not
- 0:48only head of state, but also head of
- 0:50government. This is different, for
- 0:54example, from another country that
- 0:56might be a parliamentary republic, that
- 0:59is, where the head of state is the
- 1:01president, but the head of government
- 1:03is the chancellor, the speaker of the
- 1:05house, or even the prime minister. In
- 1:09the case of Brazil, we have been a
- 1:11presidential republic since 1889, when
- 1:13the monarchy ended. And we are also a
- 1:16republic because we have three clearly
- 1:18separated branches of power. We have
- 1:21the executive branch, the legislative
- 1:23branch, and the judicial branch. As
- 1:26voters, we only have the right to
- 1:28choose the first two branches, that is,
- 1:31the executive and the legislative,
- 1:33directly. The judiciary is chosen
- 1:36indirectly. Why? Because the
- 1:38representatives of the judiciary are
- 1:40chosen by those we ourselves elected in
- 1:43the legislative or the executive
- 1:45branches. Elections, it is important to
- 1:48emphasize, are the most beautiful and
- 1:50pure form of exercising democracy.
- 1:53Remembering that in a democracy there
- 1:55are elections, meaning there is the
- 1:57popular choice of your representatives,
- 1:59the representatives of the people. In
- 2:02flawed democracies or autocracies,
- 2:04there are either no elections, or the
- 2:07elections are conducted in a less than
- 2:09transparent way. I guarantee you that
- 2:11this is not the case in Brazil,
- 2:13fortunately, at least for now. And we
- 2:15also have direct elections in Brazil.
- 2:18Why? Because they can also be indirect,
- 2:21as is the case in the United States,
- 2:22right? In the case of Brazil, we choose
- 2:25our candidates and our representatives
- 2:27directly, while in the United States,
- 2:28it is not quite like that. Since the
- 2:31case of the United States is much more
- 2:33complex than ours, we won't talk about
- 2:35it, but if you want to know more about
- 2:37it, just leave a little comment there
- 2:38and we can make a video about it. Yes.
- 2:42In Brazil, voting is mandatory. This is
- 2:45to ensure the greatest possible popular
- 2:47participation. And it is mandatory from
- 2:50age 18 to 70. If a person is 17, they
- 2:54may or may not vote; in other words,
- 2:56they can choose if they want to vote.
- 3:01But to vote, you must always be
- 3:03registered with the Electoral Court;
- 3:05that is, you must have a document, the
- 3:08voter registration card, without which
- 3:10you cannot vote. It is important to
- 3:14emphasize that Brazil is a huge country
- 3:17, both in terms of territory, with over
- 3:208.5 million square kilometers, and
- 3:22population, with over 210 million
- 3:24inhabitants. So, it is to be expected
- 3:27that the elections are as robust as
- 3:30this enormous, wonderful country. To
- 3:33give you an idea, there are over 156
- 3:36million registered voters for the 2022
- 3:39elections, who will use over 577,000
- 3:42electronic ballot boxes to exercise
- 3:45their popular will. After all, there
- 3:50are over 28,000 candidates for
- 3:52president, senator, state deputy,
- 3:54federal deputy, and governor. And all
- 3:58of this is not free. After all, it
- 4:00involves a lot of people, a lot of
- 4:02infrastructure, and a lot of money. To
- 4:05give you an idea, there is nearly 5
- 4:07billion Brazilian reais just in public
- 4:09funding, not counting private funding
- 4:12from individuals who help finance the
- 4:14campaigns of all these candidates. And
- 4:18all this money, the nearly 5 billion
- 4:20reais in public funding, is divided
- 4:22among no less than 32 political parties
- 4:25. As you can see, it is a large volume
- 4:28of money used to fund the electoral
- 4:30process in Brazil. And this process is
- 4:33financed with both public and private
- 4:35money. Why does public money come in,
- 4:38and it's not a small amount of public
- 4:39money? This public money comes in
- 4:42precisely because that way we can
- 4:44better exercise democracy. After all,
- 4:47democracy costs money, and therefore,
- 4:49it gives candidates a better chance to
- 4:52share their proposals with as many
- 4:54people as possible. If we didn't have
- 4:57public funding, we would rely solely on
- 4:59private funding, which would favor the
- 5:01candidates who have the most money.
- 5:04Imagine, we would cease to be a
- 5:06democracy and become a plutocracy,
- 5:08which is when the wealthiest are the
- 5:10ones in charge. That's right.
- 5:13Furthermore, we must remember that this
- 5:15electoral process also relies on
- 5:17private money, but that private money
- 5:19can only come from the pockets of
- 5:21individuals, although in the recent
- 5:24past, corporations could also
- 5:25contribute. The problem is that legal
- 5:28entities, companies, don't vote, and
- 5:30therefore, if they contribute, they
- 5:32will contribute with some interest. And
- 5:34this interest can be illicit, meaning
- 5:37it can be contrary to the popular will.
- 5:39That is why it was recently prohibited,
- 5:42meaning companies can no longer
- 5:44contribute to the electoral process. In
- 5:47the legislative branch, you will vote
- 5:50for candidates for state deputy,
- 5:52federal deputy, and senator. Terms of
- 5:55office, except for senator, last 4
- 5:57years. In other words, you choose these
- 6:00state and federal deputies every 4
- 6:02years and you choose one or two
- 6:05senators every 4 years, because their
- 6:07term is 8 years and, therefore, every 4
- 6:10years you have the rotation of one or
- 6:12two senators. This year, only one
- 6:14senator is being chosen by the voters
- 6:17in each state. By the way, there are a
- 6:20total of 513 federal deputies who will
- 6:23be chosen proportionally to the
- 6:25population of each state, with a
- 6:27minimum of eight deputies for the least
- 6:30populous states and 70 for the most
- 6:32populous. In the case of senators, we
- 6:36have 81 senators, 81 seats in total,
- 6:38and each state has the right to a fixed
- 6:41number, which is three senators.
- 6:45Federal deputies will represent the
- 6:47will of their state from a popular
- 6:49perspective, while senators will
- 6:51represent the will of the state from a
- 6:53territorial perspective. And then you
- 6:57also have the state deputies. This
- 7:00varies for each of the states, but is
- 7:02always a number proportional to the
- 7:04population of those states as well. In
- 7:07other words, state legislative
- 7:09assemblies will have varying numbers of
- 7:12seats for state deputies. That depends
- 7:14on each of the states. Therefore, it is
- 7:17also important to remember that votes
- 7:19for the legislature, the elections for
- 7:21the legislature, are calculated
- 7:23proportionally. All this to make
- 7:25elections more transparent, fairer. And
- 7:28more representative of the popular will
- 7:31. We manage to conduct this
- 7:33proportional election by calculating an
- 7:35electoral quotient, which is nothing
- 7:38more than dividing the total number of
- 7:40valid votes by the number of seats for
- 7:42that specific office. For example, if
- 7:46we are calculating the electoral
- 7:48quotient for federal deputies, we will
- 7:50take the total number of valid votes
- 7:52for all federal deputies and divide it
- 7:54by 513, which is the number of seats
- 7:56that the office of federal deputy has.
- 7:59Then we will arrive at a number X that
- 8:01changes every election. Taking this
- 8:03number, we will divide the total number
- 8:06of votes that a party or coalition has
- 8:08by this number, which is the electoral
- 8:11quotient. With this division, we arrive
- 8:14at the party quotient, that is, the
- 8:16minimum number of votes a party needs
- 8:18to have to hold a seat in the office
- 8:20being analyzed. For example, that of a
- 8:23federal deputy. If we have a number X
- 8:26of votes as the party quotient and the
- 8:28specific party we are analyzing has 4x
- 8:31votes, it will be entitled to four
- 8:33seats in that office. In this office,
- 8:36in this case, the office of federal
- 8:38deputy. And then it will distribute
- 8:40these four seats among the four
- 8:42candidates with the most votes. It is
- 8:45also important to say that this applies
- 8:47to state and federal deputies, but it
- 8:48does not apply to senators, especially
- 8:50because the number of senators is fixed
- 8:52per state. It is a number of three
- 8:55senators. In this case, for this
- 8:57election, we will only choose one of
- 8:58these three senators. And, therefore,
- 9:00the elections will not be proportional
- 9:02for the Senate, but rather for state
- 9:04and federal deputies. One of the
- 9:07problems of the proportional system is
- 9:09that of vote pullers, who are very
- 9:11popular people who tend to receive many
- 9:14more votes than the party quotient
- 9:16requires. Since all votes for a party's
- 9:20candidate go to the party, it then
- 9:22divides the number of seats it will
- 9:24have among the most voted candidates.
- 9:28If one candidate receives many votes
- 9:30and the runner-up receives few votes,
- 9:33but in total the party is entitled to
- 9:35two or three seats, it may end up
- 9:37electing two or three people who are
- 9:39not very popular and did not receive
- 9:41many votes. All because one person from
- 9:45the party received so many votes that
- 9:47they can be distributed to less voted
- 9:50people. This is a distortion of the
- 9:52system that ends up attracting many
- 9:54popular people to some specific parties
- 9:56. A state or federal deputy basically
- 10:00has the same functions. They are a
- 10:02legislator and an overseer. They
- 10:06legislate when they create law
- 10:08proposals or vote on law proposals that
- 10:10can become part of the state or
- 10:12country's legal system. And they will
- 10:17also oversee the application of the
- 10:19federal or state budget. It is
- 10:22important for us to understand that no
- 10:24decision is taken individually in the
- 10:26legislature, that is, they are
- 10:27negotiations that sometimes drag on for
- 10:30months so that a bill or a budget
- 10:31proposal is approved. Furthermore, we
- 10:35have to understand that as they are
- 10:37voting on laws or overseeing the budget
- 10:39, they are representing the popular
- 10:41will, because it was the popular will
- 10:43that put them there. Another important
- 10:48role of state or federal deputies is
- 10:50the oversight of the governor or the
- 10:52president, respectively. Look at how
- 10:55many important things a legislator has
- 10:57to do. And at the end of the day, we
- 10:59end up voting and don't even remember
- 11:01who we voted for in a legislative
- 11:02position, right? Senators, on the other
- 11:05hand, act as reviewers for the Chamber.
- 11:08The Chamber and the Senate together
- 11:11form the Congress and work in synergy.
- 11:15Beyond their role in reviewing what the
- 11:18Chamber decides, senators also
- 11:20represent not the popular will itself,
- 11:23but the interests of the states they
- 11:26represent. Remember I mentioned there
- 11:29are three senators for each state? Well
- 11:31, it's a fixed number, and each of
- 11:32those three senators from each state
- 11:34represents the state's interests
- 11:36collectively, rather than the interests
- 11:38of their own voters. In other words,
- 11:42while federal or state deputies may
- 11:44defend the agendas of the group of
- 11:46individuals who voted for them,
- 11:48senators must defend the collective
- 11:50interest of the state they represent.
- 11:53Furthermore, the Senate is considered
- 11:55the upper house of Congress, while the
- 11:57Chamber is considered the lower house
- 11:59of Congress. Since the Chamber of
- 12:02Deputies represents the popular will,
- 12:05the Speaker of the Chamber is third in
- 12:07the presidential line of succession.
- 12:11That is, if the president and
- 12:13vice-president cannot govern, even
- 12:15temporarily, the Speaker of the Chamber
- 12:17is the first to take over. The
- 12:20Brazilian electoral system is quite
- 12:22complex and has a number of distortions
- 12:24. Perhaps the main one is the huge
- 12:27number of blank and null votes, that is
- 12:29, invalid votes. This is because, let's
- 12:32remember, voting is mandatory for those
- 12:34between 18 and 70 years old. Many
- 12:38individuals have no desire to vote, but
- 12:40are forced to because if they don't,
- 12:42they have to justify it, pay fines, and
- 12:44fulfill a series of rituals required by
- 12:47the electoral justice, so they end up
- 12:49nullifying their vote or leaving it
- 12:51blank. This makes predicting the number
- 12:55of voters very difficult, precisely
- 12:57because we have over 150 million voters
- 12:59, but we don't know how many will
- 13:01actually result in valid votes. For
- 13:04that very reason, the party quotient is
- 13:07different in every election. Another
- 13:09issue is the lack of motivation to vote
- 13:11. One reason is that it is mandatory.
- 13:13And two, because people understand very
- 13:15little of the whole process. They do
- 13:17not properly understand how voting is
- 13:20proportional, how that proportionality
- 13:23is calculated, and therefore, they feel
- 13:25no desire to fulfill their obligation
- 13:28and their right to vote. And a third
- 13:31important issue is people's lack of
- 13:33partisan political identity, precisely
- 13:36because they perceive that we have too
- 13:38many parties—32 in total—and they
- 13:41are very similar in their ideologies,
- 13:43therefore they end up not adequately
- 13:46representing the popular will. Yeah,
- 13:49it's a system as complex as this
- 13:51country itself. We also cannot forget
- 13:54the executive elections, which in this
- 13:57year of 2022 will choose
- 13:58representatives for president and state
- 14:01governor. These elections also happen
- 14:05every 4 years, which is the term length
- 14:07for executive representatives, and they
- 14:10are decided by majority vote, meaning,
- 14:12obviously, whoever gets the most votes
- 14:15wins. By the way, it's important to say
- 14:19that for almost all executive positions
- 14:21, we will always have two rounds,
- 14:23meaning there are two rounds of voting.
- 14:27In one, all candidates compete, and in
- 14:29the second round, that is, the runoff,
- 14:31only the two most voted candidates will
- 14:34compete for the popular vote. And then
- 14:37we will have the definitive choice at
- 14:39the end of the second round. It is also
- 14:42important to say that for executive
- 14:45office, it is always possible to run
- 14:47for reelection, meaning the individual
- 14:50who is governing can run for a new 4-
- 14:53year term in office. After being
- 14:56reelected, they cannot run for a third
- 14:59consecutive term, but if they wait for
- 15:01one term, they can run for two more
- 15:03consecutive terms, if that's the case.
- 15:06The office of President of the Republic
- 15:08is the highest position in Brazilian
- 15:10politics. This is because they will be
- 15:12the head of the executive branch. And
- 15:14in the case of a presidential republic
- 15:16like Brazil's, they will occupy two
- 15:18important roles: head of government and
- 15:20head of state. As head of government,
- 15:25they will be responsible for
- 15:27implementing public policies, whether
- 15:29directly by themselves, presenting
- 15:31bills, or through their ministers, who
- 15:33are nothing less than representatives
- 15:35of their own will in each of the
- 15:37respective areas where the ministries
- 15:40operate, for example: health or
- 15:42education. Furthermore, the president
- 15:45also has the power to veto or sanction
- 15:47laws. In practice, it is the
- 15:49tie-breaking vote. When Congress passes
- 15:51a law, the final say is always with the
- 15:54President of the Republic. And so they
- 15:56can approve or reject this law
- 15:58partially. Of course, if they reject a
- 16:02law, it goes back to Congress, and if
- 16:04Congress really wants to pass that law,
- 16:06they can pass it again, and the second
- 16:08time it doesn't go through the
- 16:09president's hands; it's approved
- 16:11immediately. But that is a very
- 16:13difficult situation. Including as head
- 16:16of state, however, the president has
- 16:18the role of representing the nation
- 16:20before the international community. And
- 16:24here I include the nation's visits to
- 16:26other heads of state, the visits of
- 16:28other heads of state to the nation—
- 16:30meaning the president acts as host to
- 16:32other heads of state—or even
- 16:34representation at the United Nations.
- 16:37In fact, it is the president who gives
- 16:39the speech at the United Nations
- 16:41General Assembly. Look at how many
- 16:43important things. That is why it is
- 16:46important that we choose wisely who
- 16:48will represent us in all these matters.
- 16:51Presidents and governors may run for
- 16:53reelection, always with a maximum of
- 16:56two consecutive terms, unlike
- 16:58legislative candidates, who can be
- 17:01reelected indefinitely as long as they
- 17:04have popular support. Now, this all
- 17:07leads us to think about the advantage
- 17:10that someone who holds a current office
- 17:13has over someone who does not hold that
- 17:16office. This advantage is what we call
- 17:18the advantage of using the public
- 17:20machinery. Why? Because those in an
- 17:23elected office have access to the
- 17:25budget, and with access to the public
- 17:27budget, they can direct it to please as
- 17:29many voters as possible. In other words
- 17:32, they will have more of an advantage
- 17:34than those who are not yet in an
- 17:36elected office and, therefore, can also
- 17:38distort the electoral process. It is
- 17:41important for us to note this because
- 17:43many candidates currently holding
- 17:46elected offices will make use of this
- 17:48mechanism precisely to temporarily
- 17:50please their potential voters. In
- 17:54Brazil, we know, we cast our votes
- 17:56using electronic voting machines, which
- 17:59shouldn't have all the controversy that
- 18:01they carry. After all, this controversy
- 18:04is not justified by logic. Electronic
- 18:07voting machines are just an electronic
- 18:09way of counting votes, and that is why
- 18:11they are perfectly secure. After all,
- 18:14it is not just Brazil that uses
- 18:16electronic voting machines. In fact, we
- 18:18have more than 20 countries, including
- 18:20Canada, the United States, India, and
- 18:23even France, using electronic voting
- 18:25machines as well. In the case of Brazil
- 18:28, electronic voting machines have been
- 18:30used since 1996, and today practically
- 18:31every election will always use
- 18:33electronic voting machines. Except in
- 18:36the event of some failure. Remembering
- 18:38that it is much harder to rig votes in
- 18:40an electronic voting machine than in a
- 18:42paper ballot box. After all, anyone can
- 18:44put extra votes into a ballot box if
- 18:46they have access to it, in a paper
- 18:48ballot box. Now, with an electronic
- 18:50voting machine, you would need enormous
- 18:52sophistication. This sophistication is
- 18:54increased when you consider that all
- 18:56Brazilian electronic voting machines
- 18:58are disconnected from each other and
- 19:00also disconnected from the internet. In
- 19:02other words, it is not possible for you
- 19:04to carry out a collective hack of the
- 19:06machines. If it were possible to hack
- 19:08the ballot boxes, you would have to
- 19:10hack them one by one, which would be
- 19:12humanly impossible to rig an election
- 19:15on a large scale. Another important
- 19:17thing is that the votes are indeed
- 19:19auditable; in other words, you can get
- 19:21the individual result of each ballot
- 19:23box without having to do anything,
- 19:24without needing to go to a dark room at
- 19:26the TSE or anything like that. All
- 19:29ballot boxes have their individual
- 19:31results published on the TSE website
- 19:34itself after the election. And you can
- 19:37go there and, if you want, add up all
- 19:39of the more than 577,000 ballot boxes
- 19:42to reach the final vote tally.
- 19:44Therefore, electronic ballot boxes are
- 19:46perfectly secure, and it is not by
- 19:47chance that we have been using them for
- 19:49so long with such success. All this
- 19:51hearsay and false information about
- 19:53electronic ballot boxes is part of a
- 19:56larger package that we call fake news.
- 19:59Fake news is not a problem exclusive to
- 20:01Brazil. In fact, it doesn't even start
- 20:03here. It starts abroad, probably in the
- 20:06United States, and today it plagues a
- 20:07large part of the democratic process
- 20:09around the world. It wouldn't be any
- 20:11different here in the case of Brazil.
- 20:12And it's not just in these elections
- 20:14that we have been facing fake news. For
- 20:16some years now, we have seen fake news
- 20:18spreading, especially now that many
- 20:20people have access to mobile internet
- 20:22and, therefore, to information in real
- 20:25time, in a fast way. And, therefore, we
- 20:28will have much more exposure to this
- 20:30fake news. Fake news can be used to
- 20:34damage a candidate's image or to
- 20:36enhance a candidate's image, but always
- 20:38with lies. And it is important that we
- 20:41try to understand what is and what is
- 20:44not fake news. For this, it is
- 20:45important that you research, that you
- 20:47never trust information that comes from
- 20:50people, from individuals who may have
- 20:52an interest in changing your vote.
- 20:54Therefore, always double-check the
- 20:56information; in other words, receive
- 20:58the information, yes, but check it
- 21:01later on websites or even in specific
- 21:03places dedicated to debunking fake news
- 21:05. One of the easiest ways to do this is
- 21:09to verify suspicious news using Google.
- 21:12You type a snippet of the news into
- 21:14Google and check if there is already
- 21:16any fake news debunking site trying to
- 21:18identify it as a rumor, as a false
- 21:20story. It is important for you to
- 21:23understand that this is part of the
- 21:25process of exercising democracy and
- 21:26citizenship. In other words, fighting
- 21:28fake news is also an obligation for all
- 21:30of us. In fact, if you fight fake news,
- 21:34you are not only exercising your
- 21:36citizenship and exercising democracy,
- 21:38but you are also making life easier for
- 21:39the electoral justice system, which is
- 21:41responsible for organizing the entire
- 21:43electoral process in Brazil. It is
- 21:46responsible for everything from voter
- 21:48registration to the certification of
- 21:51election results. And it is also, as
- 21:53could be expected, under attack from
- 21:55fake news. Therefore, combating fake
- 21:58news is not only about making life
- 22:00easier for the electoral justice system
- 22:02, but also exercising democracy and
- 22:04citizenship, so we can have peaceful,
- 22:06secure, reliable, and transparent
- 22:08elections. That's it. I hope you used
- 22:11this lesson to better understand how
- 22:13Brazil's electoral system works, which
- 22:15is certainly not easy, it is quite
- 22:17complex. And if you are going to vote,
- 22:20I hope you do so with a clear
- 22:21conscience, especially since we learned
- 22:23the hard way that things can always get
- 22:25worse than they already are. Hmm. M.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of Eleições no Brasil | Como funciona o Sistema Eleitoral? by Partiu Universidade, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 3,608 words across 561 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to choose a caption track available on the video.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, caption language selection, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.