Does Canada’s Bill C-16 Violate Free Speech or Protect Human Rights? | The Agenda — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:01>> Steve: WHAT'S IN A NAME?
- 0:03POTENTIALLY A GREAT DEAL.
- 0:05UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO PSYCHOLOGY PROFESSOR JORDAN PETERSON HAS A FIGHT ON HIS HANDS AFTER
- 0:09OBJECTING TO PROPOSED LEGISLATION THAT HE SAYS WOULD VIOLATE HIS FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY
- 0:14FORCING HIM TO ADDRESS TRANSGENDERED PEOPLE USING THE PRONOUNS OF THEIR CHOOSING.
- 0:19JOINING US NOW TO BETTER UNDERSTAND THE ISSUE, AND DEBATE WHAT'S AT STAKE:
- 0:23IN VANCOUVER, B.C.: THERYN MEYER, TRANSGENDER PUNDIT AND YouTuber;
- 0:30IN THE NATION'S CAPITAL: KYLE KIRKUP, PROFESSOR OF LAW, UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA.
- 0:34AND HERE IN STUDIO: JORDAN PETERSON, PROFESSOR OF PSYCHOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF
- 0:38TORONTO; NICHOLAS MATTE, LECTURER, TRANSGENDER STUDIES AT U OF T;
- 0:43AND, MARY ROGAN, WHOSE ARTICLE ENTITLED "GROWING UP TRANS" IS FEATURED IN THE OCTOBER ISSUE OF
- 0:47THE WALRUS.
- 0:51GOOD TO HAVE YOU THREE HERE AND OUR TWO FRIENDS IN POINTS BEYOND.
- 0:55WE APPRECIATE EVERYBODY BEING ON THE PROGRAM FOR WHAT IS I THINK ONE OF THE HOTTEST TOPICS IN THE
- 1:00COUNTRY TODAY, PROFESSOR PETERSON, AND IT'S ALL BECAUSE OF YOU.
- 1:03I THINK BEFORE WE GO ANY FURTHER WITH OUR CONVERSATION HERE, I WANT TO GIVE PEOPLE A SENSE OF
- 1:09HOW HOT THIS HAS GOT, STARTING ON THE DOWNTOWN CAMPUS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO.
- 1:13SHELDON, IF YOU WOULD?
- 1:14ROLL IT.
- 1:21[MIXED VOICES] >> WELL, AS YOU CAN SEE, THE OPPONENTS OF FREE SPEECH ARE
- 1:27CAPABLE OF MAKING A LOT OF INARTICULATE NOISE.
- 1:32>> FREE SPEECH.
- 1:33IT'S THE MECHANISM BY WHICH WE KEEP OUR SOCIETY FUNCTIONING.
- 1:39>> BY DOING THAT, YOU'RE IMPOSING -- >> WHOA, WHOA, WHOA, WHOA.
- 1:44NO, NOT COOL.
- 1:45NOT COOL.
- 1:46>> I'M GOING TO POST THIS ONLINE THAT YOU WOULD LIKE PEOPLE TO BE MORE ACCOMMODATING OF TRANS
- 1:54PEOPLE AT YOUR EVENTS IN THE FUTURE.
- 1:56>> I'M A PERSON OF COLOUR AND I FEEL ACCOMMODATED.
- 1:59>> THERE HAVE BEEN MULTIPLE RECORDED INCIDENTS OF TRANS PEOPLE KILLING THEMSELVES
- 2:04BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT BEING INTEGRATED INTO SOCIETY.
- 2:07>> IF IT WASN'T FOR THIS LAW AND I ASK YOU TO REFER TO ME WITH THE CORRECT PRONOUNS.
- 2:13>> WHY DO YOU HAVE AUTHORITY TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT AN INDIVIDUAL IS WORTHY OF YOU
- 2:18USING THEIR PRONOUNS.
- 2:19IF I ASKED YOU IF YOU WOULD PLEASE USE THE PRONOUNS -- >> IT DEPENDS ON WHAT --
- 2:26>> Steve: WITH INDULGENCE OF EVERYBODY ELSE ON THE PROGRAM, I'M GOING TO START WITH
- 2:31PROFESSOR PETERSON OFF THE TOP HERE FOR A WHILE BECAUSE, AS I SUGGESTED, YOU THOUGHT LONG AND
- 2:36HARD ABOUT THIS.
- 2:37YOU POSTED A FEW THINGS UP TO YouTube BECAUSE YOU HAD BEEN THINKING LONG AND HARD ABOUT IT.
- 2:44ONE AND A HALF MILLION HITS LATER, JORDAN, ONE AND A HALF MILLION HITS LATER, THIS HAS
- 2:50BECOME A HUGE ISSUE.
- 2:51SO LET'S START THERE.
- 2:52WHY DID YOU POST THOSE VIEWS TO YouTube IN THE FIRST PLACE?
- 2:56>> Jordan Peterson: WELL, THERE'S PROXIMATE AND DISTAL REASONS.
- 3:01THE PROXIMATE REASONS WAS BECAUSE I RECEIVED SOME CORRESPONDENCE FROM CLIENTS OF
- 3:07MINE WHO HAD BEEN, I WOULD SAY, PERSECUTED IN A VARIETY OF WAYS BY PEOPLE WHO ARE POLITICALLY
- 3:15CORRECT AND THEY SENT ME SOME DOCUMENTATION ABOUT BILL C-16 AND THE ASSOCIATED POLICY
- 3:19STATEMENTS ON THE ONTARIO HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, WHICH I READ, AND WAS NOT VERY HAPPY ABOUT,
- 3:26AND ALSO BECAUSE THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO DECIDED TO MAKE ANTI-RACISM AND ANTIBIAS
- 3:32TRAINING, SO-CALLED ANTI-RACISM AND ANTIBIAS TRAINING MANDATORY, WHICH I REGARDED AS AN
- 3:40INAPPROPRIATE INCURSION BY THE UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATION.
- 3:43>> Steve: HAVE YOU TAKEN THAT TRAINING YET?
- 3:45>> Jordan Peterson: NO, AND I DON'T HAVE TO YET.
- 3:47IT'S THE H.R. PERSONNEL THAT HAVE TO TAKE IT.
- 3:49>> Steve: IF THEY DECIDE YOU HAVE TO, WILL YOU TAKE IT?
- 3:52>> Jordan Peterson: NO WAY.
- 3:53NOT A CHANCE.
- 3:53>> Steve: YOU REFERRED TO PERSECUTION THAT FRIENDS OR CLIENTS HAD EXPERIENCED.
- 3:58>> Jordan Peterson: WELL, YEAH.
- 3:59THERE ARE LOTS OF PLACES NOW WHERE THE WORKPLACE HAS BECOME, I WOULD SAY, EXCESSIVELY
- 4:04POLITICIZED, SO PEOPLE WHO HAVE VIEWPOINTS, AND THIS ALSO INCLUDES, I WOULD SAY, FAIRLY
- 4:09RADICAL LEFTIST VIEWPOINTS, PEOPLE DON'T FEEL COMFORTABLE AT ALL IN BEING ABLE TO USE THE
- 4:13LANGUAGE OF THEIR CHOICE OR TO HAVE EVEN OPINIONS ABOUT A VARIETY OF DIFFERENT THINGS, AND
- 4:20SO -- I'VE HAD THREE CLIENTS WHO I WOULD SAY HAVE BEEN, WE'LL SAY, HARASSED, I SUPPOSE IS THE
- 4:28RIGHT WAY OF PUTTING IT -- >> Steve: ON SOCIAL MEDIA OR OTHERWISE?
- 4:31>> Jordan Peterson: NO, AT WORK, AT WORK, BY PEOPLE WHO DON'T LIKE THEIR POLITICAL
- 4:36OPINIONS, ESSENTIALLY.
- 4:36>> Steve: AND THE OPINIONS WERE WHAT?
- 4:39>> Jordan Peterson: I CAN'T TELL YOU TOO MUCH ABOUT IT, ACTUALLY, BECAUSE OF ISSUES --
- 4:44FUNDAMENTAL ISSUES OF CONFIDENTIALITY.
- 4:47>> Steve: ESSENTIALLY I GUESS WHAT I'M ASKING IS TO LAY THE CASE OUT.
- 4:50WHAT IS IT YOU FIND OFFENSIVE ABOUT THIS LEGISLATION?
- 4:53>> Jordan Peterson: FUNDAMENTALLY, THERE ARE TWO THINGS THAT REALLY BOTHERED ME,
- 4:56ALTHOUGH THERE HAVE BEEN OTHER THINGS I'VE THOUGHT ABOUT SINCE.
- 4:59ONE IS I WAS BEING ASKED, AS EVERYONE IS, TO USE A CERTAIN SET OF WORDS THAT I THINK ARE
- 5:04CONSTRUCTIONS OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE A POLITICAL IDEOLOGY THAT I DON'T BELIEVE IN AND I ALSO
- 5:09REGARD AS DANGEROUS.
- 5:10>> Steve: WHAT ARE THOSE WORDS?
- 5:11>> Jordan Peterson: THOSE ARE THE MADE-UP WORDS THAT PEOPLE NOW DESCRIBE AS GENDER NEUTRAL,
- 5:15AND SO TO ME, THEY'RE AN ATTEMPT TO CONTROL LANGUAGE AND IN A DIRECTION THAT ISN'T HAPPENING
- 5:24ORGANICALLY, IT'S NO THE HAPPENING NATURALLY, PEOPLE AREN'T PICKING UP THESE WORDS IN
- 5:29THE TYPICAL WAY NEW WORDS ARE PICKED UP, BUT BY FORCE AND BY FIAT.
- 5:33I WOULD SAY BY FORCE BECAUSE THERE'S LEGISLATIVE POWER BEHIND THEM AND I DON'T LIKE THE
- 5:39MADE-UP WORDS, THEY AND THEY'RE.
- 5:43>> Steve: THEY IS ONE OF THEM, TO SPEAK TO AN INDIVIDUAL AS THEY.
- 5:46>> Jordan Peterson: WE CAN'T DISPENSE BETWEEN THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN SINGULAR AND PLURAL.
- 5:50I KNOW THE ADVOCATES OF THAT PARTICULAR APPROACH SAY THEY HAS BEEN USED FOREVER AS A SINGULAR
- 5:55AND THAT'S ACTUALLY NOT CORRECT.
- 5:56IT'S USED AS A SINGULAR IN VERY EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES, LIKE IF YOUR CHILD WISHES TO BRING A
- 6:01BOOK TO SCHOOL, THEY'RE WELCOME TO DO SO.
- 6:03>> Steve: THAT'S JUST GRAMMATICALLY INCORRECT.
- 6:07>> Jordan Peterson: THERE'S SOME DEBATE ABOUT THAT, BECAUSE "THEY" IS USED LIKE THAT
- 6:12SOMETIMES.
- 6:12BUT IT'S NEVER BEEN USED AS A SINGULAR REPLACEMENT FOR HE OR SHE.
- 6:15SO IT'S NOT A TENABLE SOLUTION AND THAT'S THE BEST OF THE SOLUTIONS.
- 6:19>> Steve: WE UNDERSTAND YOUR VIEWS AND WHERE YOU'RE COMING FROM.
- 6:22YOU'VE DECIDED TO LAY THESE VIEWS OUT IN SOME YouTube DISCOURSES.
- 6:27>> Jordan Peterson: YES.
- 6:27>> Steve: YOU PUT THEM UP.
- 6:28THE RESPONSE HAS BEEN OVERWHELMING.
- 6:31>> Jordan Peterson: YES.
- 6:31>> Steve: DID YOU ANTICIPATE YOU WOULD GET THIS KIND OF FEEDBACK?
- 6:34>> Jordan Peterson: NO, THERE WAS NO WAY OF ANTICIPATING THIS.
- 6:36YOU MENTIONED IN THE INTRO THAT THIS IS A CONSEQUENCE OF WHAT I'VE DONE.
- 6:40I DON'T THINK THAT'S TRUE.
- 6:41IT'S A CONSEQUENCE OF THE FACT -- I THOUGHT ABOUT IT AND I THINK THE RIGHT METAPHOR IS
- 6:47THERE'S A LARGE FOREST AND IT'S BEEN A HOT, DRY SUMMER OR MAYBE A DROUGHT AND THERE'S PLENTY OF
- 6:53DEADWOOD GATHERED AND I LIT A SPARK.
- 6:55YOU CAN'T BLAME THE FOREST FIRE ON THE SPARK.
- 6:58IT'S JUST NOT POSSIBLE FOR SOMEONE TO PUT UP A YouTube VIDEO AND CAUSE THIS KIND OF
- 7:08BROUHAHA WITHOUT THE GROUNDWORK BEING LAID.
- 7:10>> Steve: THERE IS OUT THERE AN APPETITE AGAINST POLITICAL CORRECTNESS WHICH IS WHAT YOU
- 7:13HAVE DESCRIBED THIS AS.
- 7:14IN FACT, YOUR YouTube VIDEO IS CALLED PROFESSOR AGAINST POLITICAL CORRECTNESS.
- 7:18LET'S ALL MAKE SURE WE'RE SPEAKING THE SAME LANGUAGE HERE.
- 7:21YOU WOULD DEFINE THAT HOW, POLITICAL CORRECTNESS?
- 7:23>> Jordan Peterson: I THINK IT'S A PARTICULAR KIND OF I HAD LOGICAL GAME AND -- IDEOLOGICAL
- 7:31GAME.
- 7:32IT'S TO MAKE THE PERSON FEEL SUPERIOR AND AXE SWINGING AT THE FOUNDATION OF SOCIETY, SO THE
- 7:37GAME IS IDENTIFY A DOMAIN OF HUMAN ENDEAVOUR.
- 7:40NOTE THAT THERE'S A DISTRIBUTION OF SUCCESS.
- 7:42SOME PEOPLE ARE DOING COMPARATIVELY BETTER AND SOME PEOPLE ARE DOING COMPARATIVELY
- 7:47WORSE.
- 7:47DEFINE THOSE DOING WORSE AS VICTIMS.
- 7:50DEFINE THOSE DOING BETTER AS PERPETRATORS.
- 7:52IDENTIFY WITH THE VICTIMS.
- 7:54HAVE YOURSELF A SET OF ENEMIES HANDY TO VENT YOUR RESENTMENT ON.
- 7:59FEEL GOOD ABOUT IT EVEN THOUGH IT DIDN'T REALLY REQUIRE ANY WORK ON YOUR PART.
- 8:04AND THEN ENDLESSLY REPEAT.
- 8:05THAT'S WHAT I'VE BEEN SEEING HAPPENING ON CAMPUSES IN PARTICULAR FOR THE LAST 30
- 8:12YEARS?
- 8:12IN YOUR YouTube YOU DESCRIBE THOSE WHO OPPOSE YOU AS RESENTFUL AND UNINFORMED.
- 8:19WHY DO YOU THINK THAT'S ACCURATE?
- 8:22>> Jordan Peterson: I WORKED FOR THE NDP UNTIL THE TIME I WAS 14 I WORKED WITH RACHEL NOTLEY'S
- 8:27MOTHER AND FATHER AND KNEW THEM VERY WELL.
- 8:29I ACTUALLY FOUND THEM AS ADMIRABLE PEOPLE AS WELL AS THE OTHER PEOPLE ON THE SOCIALIST
- 8:35END OF THE DISTRIBUTION WHO ARE GENERALLY WORKING FOR THE RIGHTS OF WORKING CLASS PEOPLE, COMING
- 8:39OUT OF THE SASKATCHEWAN TRADITION THAT ESTABLISHED HEALTH CARE AND PENSION AND ALL
- 8:42OF THAT.
- 8:43BUT I NOTED AT THE SAME TIME THAT THE PARTY FUNCTIONARIES, LET'S SAY, WEREN'T THAT SORT OF
- 8:47PERSON AT ALL.
- 8:48THEY DIDN'T LIKE THE WORKING CLASS.
- 8:52THEY WOULDN'T STAND UP FOR THEM.
- 8:53I COULDN'T PUT MY FINGER ON IT UNTIL I READ GEORGE ORWELL WHICH WAS WRITTEN FOR THE LEFT BOOK
- 8:59CLUB IN THE U.K. AND HE WAS TALKING ABOUT THE FAILURES OF SOCIALISM IN THE UNITED KINGDOM
- 9:04AND THEN DISCUSSED INTELLECTUAL SOCIALISTS.
- 9:13>> Steve: RESENTFUL AND UNINFORMED?
- 9:16>> Jordan Peterson: THE RESENTFULNESS IS THE WILLINGNESS TO PULL DOWN ANY STRUCTURE
- 9:20THAT'S HIERARCHICAL BECAUSE OF RESENTMENT OF NOT BEING ON THE TOP.
- 9:26AND UNINFORMED IS THE CONSISTENT ATTEMPT TO FORCE EVERY POLITICAL ISSUE INTO A SINGLE -- INTO THE
- 9:32DOMAIN ENCOMPASSED AND VIEWED THROUGH THIS SINGLE LENS.
- 9:34>> Steve: JORDAN, LET'S DO ONE MORE QUESTION AND THEN GET EVERYBODY ELSE INTO THE
- 9:39CONVERSATION.
- 9:40YOU KNOW OF COURSE SINCE THIS STORY BROKE YOU'VE BEEN CALLED A LOT OF THINGS.
- 9:43>> Jordan Peterson: YEAH.
- 9:43>> Steve: ONE OF WHICH IS A TRANSPHOBE.
- 9:47SOME PEOPLE HAVE ACCUSED YOU OF USING THE FREE SPEECH ISSUE TO MASK WHAT'S REALLY GOING ON
- 9:52HERE, WHICH IS AN ATTEMPT TO DEPRIVE OTHER PEOPLE OF WHAT THEY BELIEVE ARE THEIR
- 9:57LEGITIMATE RIGHTS.
- 9:58WE'LL GIVE YOU THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK TO WHETHER OR NOT YOU ARE A TRANSPHOBE.
- 10:01>> Jordan Peterson: I CAN TELL YOU I'VE RECEIVED MORE LETTERS FROM TRANSSEXUAL PEOPLE
- 10:05SUPPORTING ME THAN OPPOSING ME, AND I NEVER SAID ANYTHING REALLY ABOUT TRANSSEXUAL PEOPLE ABOUT
- 10:10THEIR EXISTENCE, ALTHOUGH THAT WAS THE FIRST THING I WAS ACCUSED OF DOING.
- 10:13I DIDN'T SAY THAT TRANSSEXUAL PEOPLE DIDN'T EXIST.
- 10:16I SAID THAT GENDER IDENTITY, GENDER EXPRESSION AND BIOLOGICAL SEX DON'T VARY INDEPENDENTLY,
- 10:23WHICH THEY DON'T.
- 10:23SO THIS ISSUE IS IN SOME SENSE ONLY PERIPHERALLY ABOUT TRANSSEXUAL ISSUES.
- 10:29IT'S MORE CENTRALLY ABOUT GENDER ISSUES AND THEN ON TOP OF THAT, AND I THINK IT'S THE BIGGEST
- 10:34ISSUE, IS THAT IT'S A FREE SPEECH ISSUE.
- 10:36>> Steve: OKAY.
- 10:37LET US CONTINUE TO EXPLORE ALL OF THOSE ISSUES THAT YOU HAVE JUST RAISED.
- 10:43WHY DON'T WE DO THIS?
- 10:44LET'S TAKE A MOMENT.
- 10:45WE'RE GOING TO EXPLAIN A FEW BASIC THINGS HERE.
- 10:47THE ISSUE OF SO-CALLED NON-TRADITIONAL PRONOUNS GO WITH UNTRADITIONAL GENDER IDENTITIES.
- 10:53NEW YORK CITY, FOR EXAMPLE, RECOGNIZES 29 GENDER EXPRESSIONS.
- 11:01FOR EXAMPLE, PAN GENDER, QUEER GENDER, GENDER FLUID, CROSS DRESSER, BIGENDERED, GENDER
- 11:10BLENDER, AND THE LIST GOES ON.
- 11:12NICHOLAS, YOU TEACH TRANS STUDIES.
- 11:15IF YOU WOULD, GIVE US A BRIEF PRIMER ON SO MANY GENDER IDENTITIES THAT IN YOUR VIEW
- 11:21REQUIRE NON-TRADITIONAL PRONOUNS.
- 11:26>> Nicholas Matte: BASICALLY IT'S NOT CORRECT THAT THERE IS SUCH A THING AS BIOLOGICAL SEX.
- 11:29I'M AN HISTORIAN OF MEDICINE.
- 11:31I CAN UNPACK THAT FOR YOU AT GREAT LENGTH, IF YOU WANT, BUT IN THE INTERESTS OF TIME, I
- 11:37WON'T.
- 11:37THAT'S A POPULAR MISCONCEPTION.
- 11:41IN MY CLASSES WE'RE LOOKING AT ACTUAL RESEARCH AND IDENTIFYING WAYS THAT CURRENT SOCIAL ISSUES
- 11:46RELATED TO TRANS PEOPLE OR THINGS THAT ARE ASSOCIATED WITH TRANS, SUCH AS FREE SPEECH
- 11:52ARGUMENTS AND CLAIMS, HOW THAT CONNECTS TO THE WAY THAT PEOPLE ARE THINKING, THE WAY THEIR
- 11:56RESEARCH HAS BEEN FRAMED -- >> Steve: GIVE US SOME OF THE OTHER PRONOUNS THAT ONE WOULD
- 12:01HEAR TYPICALLY.
- 12:01>> Nicholas Matte: I DON'T FOCUS ON PRONOUNS BECAUSE IT'S PART OF A FIS CULTURE.
- 12:07I'LL EXPLAIN.
- 12:08WE DON'T START FROM A FIS NORMATIVE PERSPECTIVE BECAUSE THAT DOESN'T GO VERY FAR.
- 12:14>> Steve: WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?
- 12:15>> Nicholas Matte: I'LL START THERE.
- 12:20CIS IS THE POPULAR ASSUMPTION THAT MOST PEOPLE HAVE AND DEFINITELY STRUCTURES CONVEY
- 12:25THAT THERE IS SUCH A THING AS MALE AND FEMALE, THAT THEY CONNECT TO BEING A GIRL OR BOY
- 12:29OR A MAN OR A WOMAN AND THEN SOMETIMES THAT WILL ALSO RECOGNIZE TRANSSEXUAL PEOPLE, AS
- 12:36YOU MENTIONED, BECAUSE THAT'S -- SOMETIMES ALSO REFERRED TO AS A GENDER BINARY, SO THING THAT
- 12:41FITS WITHIN A GENDER BINARY CAN WORK WITHIN CIS NORMTIVITY.
- 12:49CIS NORMTIVITY IS EVERYONE ASSUMES THERE IS BOTH MALE AND FEMALE SO IT'S NOT LOOKED AT AS
- 12:57TO WHAT IS ACTUALLY THE CASE -- >> Steve: YOUR VIEW WOULD BE IT'S MUCH MORE COMPLICATED THAN
- 13:02THAT.
- 13:02>> Nicholas Matte: IT'S NOT MY VIEW.
- 13:03I KNOW FOR OVER 50 YEARS SCIENTISTS HAVE SHOWN THAT'S NOT TRUE AND YET OUR SOCIAL SYSTEMS
- 13:08HAVEN'T BEEN ABLE TO FIND A WAY TO ADDRESS THE LEVEL OF COMPLEXITY THAT PEOPLE --
- 13:12>> Jordan Peterson: CAN I STEP IN, STEVE?
- 13:14>> Steve: STAND BY FOR A SECOND.
- 13:15I WANT TO GET EVERYBODY ELSE IN FURTHER.
- 13:18>> Nicholas Matte: I DIDN'T INTERRUPT YOU EITHER.
- 13:20>> Steve: MARY, HOW PREVALENT IS TRANSGENDERISM IN OUR WORLD?
- 13:23>> Mary Rogan: I DON'T THINK I CAN ANSWER THAT QUESTION.
- 13:26I THINK THAT, I WOULD AGREE WITH NICHOLAS, THAT THERE IS SOME DISCREPANCY ON THESE NUMBERS AND
- 13:32THERE IS SOME VARIANCE ON THE NUMBERS.
- 13:36I GUESS -- I GUESS I'M CURIOUS AS TO WHY WE NEED TO PUT A NUMBER ON THIS BECAUSE THAT'S
- 13:42COME UP -- I LISTENED TO JORDAN'S VIDEO AND THAT WAS SOMETHING THAT WAS MENTIONED.
- 13:50YOU KNOW, THIS IS STATISTICALLY, YOU KNOW, THERE ARE SO FEW INTERSEX PEOPLE AS TO BE -- IT'S
- 13:58INSIGNIFICANT.
- 13:58>> Steve: THERE'S A REASONABLE CURIOSITY AS TO WHETHER OR NOT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HALF THE
- 14:02POPULATION OR LESS THAN ONE PERCENT OF THE POPULATION, THAT'S ALL.
- 14:05>> Mary Rogan: NO, I UNDERSTAND THAT.
- 14:06I GUESS WHAT I'M SAYING IS IT SEEMS THAT THERE'S A FOCUS ON THAT IN TERMS OF WHAT WE KNOW
- 14:11NOW, AND I THINK WHAT NICHOLAS IS TRYING TO SAY, AND I DON'T WANT TO PRESUME TOO MUCH, I
- 14:17THINK THAT THAT NUMBER IS GOING TO BE SOMETHING THAT EVOLVES AS WE EVOLVE AND OUR LANGUAGE
- 14:22EVOLVES AND WE GIVE PEOPLE THE ROOM TO COME FORWARD AND EXPRESS WHO THEY ARE.
- 14:26>> Steve: LET ME AS PART OF THAT EXPRESSION AND EVOLUTION OF THIS ISSUE, THE USE OF
- 14:31NON-TRADITIONAL PRONOUNCE.
- 14:32WHERE ARE YOU ON THAT?
- 14:33>> Mary Rogan: I THINK PEOPLE SHOULD BE ABLE TO SAY HOW THEY WANT TO BE ADDRESSED.
- 14:37I DO BELIEVE THAT.
- 14:39IN MY OWN EXPERIENCE IN WRITING THE WALRUS PIECE, I BEGAN AT ONE PLACE AND ENDED AT ANOTHER AND
- 14:45I'LL LET EVERYONE PAY THEIR $7 TO FIND OUT HOW, THEY CAN BUY THE MAGAZINE.
- 14:49BUT I THINK THAT FOR ME, IDENTIFYING AS MALE AT A VERY LATE STAGE IN MY LIFE, I DON'T
- 14:56HAVE -- I DIDN'T HAVE A LOT OF ATTACHMENT TO THE PRONOUNCE "SHE."
- 15:00YOU COULD HAVE SAID "GIRAFFE."
- 15:03I FOUND A WAY AT A VERY EARLY AGE NOT TO HEAR THAT WORD.
- 15:06IT MEANT NOTHING TO ME.
- 15:07SO I DIDN'T DIVE INTO THE PRONOUN "HE."
- 15:10>> Steve: IF I WERE GOING TO REFER TO YOU IN THE THIRD PERSON, YOU WOULD WANT ME TO
- 15:15CALL YOU THEY?
- 15:16>> Mary Rogan: YES.
- 15:16>> Steve: BECAUSE THAT ENCAPSULATES WHAT?
- 15:20>> Mary Rogan: I THINK IT REFLECTS WHERE I AM NOW.
- 15:22BECAUSE OF MY LIVED EXPERIENCE, YOU KNOW, FIVE DECADES AS BEING IDENTIFIED CERTAINLY BY THE
- 15:27WORLD AS FEMALE SOME OF THE TIME, NOT ALL OF THE TIME, MY LIVED EXPERIENCE WAS LARGELY
- 15:34FEMALE, AND I PERSONALLY AM NOT SORT OF READY TO JUMP IN WHOLLY INTO HAVING PEOPLE CALL ME "HE,"
- 15:41BUT I'M CERTAINLY FAR ENOUGH ALONG IN TERMS OF, YOU KNOW, HOW I FEEL INTERNALLY THAT I DON'T
- 15:47WANT TO BE CALLED "SHE."
- 15:48>> Steve: UNDERSTOOD.
- 15:49LET'S GO TO BRITISH COLUMBIA.
- 15:50THERYN, I WANT YOU TO HELP US UNDERSTAND FOR OUR VIEWERS WHO DON'T KNOW YOU AND DON'T KNOW
- 15:55YOUR WORK, I WOULD LIKE YOU TO DESCRIBE YOURSELF.
- 16:01>> Theryn Meyer: WELL, I MAKE POLITICAL COMMENTARY MOSTLY ON YouTube AND I MOSTLY FOCUS ON
- 16:12BASICALLY COUNTERING WITH MY OWN PERSONAL PERSPECTIVES, COUNTERING WHAT I CONSIDER TO BE
- 16:19THE KIND OF HEGEMONY SURROUNDING -- THE POLITICAL HEGEMONY SURROUNDING TRANS
- 16:27POLITICS AND WHAT I CONSIDER TO BE QUITE RIDICULOUS OPINIONS COMING FROM WHAT HAS COME TO BE
- 16:38KNOWN AS KIND OF THE POLITICAL TRANS LOBBY.
- 16:41>> Steve: I'M NOT AS GOOD AT THIS ISSUE AS I SHOULD BE, SO I'M GOING TO LOOK TO YOU TO HELP
- 16:46ME MAKE THE RIGHT -- USE THE RIGHT WORDS HERE TO DESCRIBE HOW YOU WERE BORN AND WHAT YOU SEE
- 16:52YOURSELF AS NOW.
- 16:53SO IS IT ACCURATE TO SAY YOU'RE A TRANS WOMAN?
- 16:58>> Theryn Meyer: YES, I'M -- I WISH I LIVED IN A WORLD WHERE THAT WAS JUST OBVIOUS AND I
- 17:04DON'T HAVE TO EXPLAIN THAT TO PEOPLE, BUT APPARENTLY I DO.
- 17:07I MEAN, YES, I'M JUST A WOMAN.
- 17:09>> Steve: IS THIS TO SAY YOU WERE BORN MALE BUT NOW ARE FEMALE?
- 17:14>> Theryn Meyer: YES.
- 17:15I TRANSITIONED FROM MALE TO FEMALE.
- 17:18>> Steve: IN WHICH CASE DO I REFER TO YOU -- I'M GOING TO ASK YOU THE SAME QUESTION I ASKED
- 17:24MARY, WHICH IS, DO I REFER TO YOU AS "HER" OR "SHE" NOW?
- 17:29>> Theryn Meyer: YES, YOU DO.
- 17:30>> Steve: YOU DO.
- 17:31OKAY.
- 17:31HOW DO YOU RELATE TO THE EXPERIENCES WE HAVE HEARD ARISE DURING THIS DEBATE WHERE GENDER
- 17:36IDENTITIES AND PRONOUNS ARE UP FOR GRABS, IF YOU LIKE?
- 17:43>> Theryn Meyer: I'M VERY SKEPTICAL OF THE IDEOLOGY SURROUNDING GENDER IDENTITY.
- 17:51I DON'T BELIEVE THERE ARE 29-PLUS GENDER IDENTITIES OR GENDERS.
- 17:58I BELIEVE THERE'S MALE AND FEMALE AND THEN THERE'S SOMEWHERE IN BETWEEN, AND MOST
- 18:03PEOPLE FALL AROUND THAT.
- 18:04AND JUST PEOPLE WHO ARE IN BETWEEN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ANY AGENDA.
- 18:09THERE ARE TWO GENDERS, PERIOD, AND THAT IS BIOLOGICALLY A SOUND ARGUMENT TO MAKE.
- 18:15JUST BECAUSE -- BECAUSE THE ARGUMENT THAT WAS MADE EARLIER IN THE SHOW, IT WASN'T AN
- 18:21ARGUMENT BUT A CLAIM, THAT THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS BIOLOGICAL SENSE.
- 18:26WELL, THAT'S SIMPLY NOT TRUE.
- 18:27IT IS TRUE THAT THERE ARE MULTIPLE CHARACTERISTICS AND THERE ARE MULTIPLE FACTORS THAT
- 18:34GO INTO DETERMINING SEX AND THAT SEX IS NOT A -- THAT THERE IS A SPECTRUM TO IT, JUST LIKE MOST
- 18:41THINGS IN NATURE, MOST THINGS DEVELOP ON A SPECTRUM.
- 18:48BUT FOR THE MOST PART, THE VAST MAJORITY OF PEOPLE FALL EITHER ON THE MALE SIDE OR ON THE
- 18:55FEMALE SIDE.
- 18:55AND, YES, IT'S TRUE THAT SCIENTISTS, THAT DOCTORS AND RESEARCHERS HAVE BEEN FINDING
- 19:01MORE AND MORE FACTORS THAT GO INTO NOT ONLY DETERMINING GENETIC SEX, THEY'RE DETERMINING
- 19:11THE EXPRESSION OF THOSE GENES, SO IT'S TRULY A FASCINATING COMPLEX FIELD OF STUDY, BUT THAT
- 19:17DOES NOT MEAN THAT THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS BIOLOGICAL SEX.
- 19:21WHEN IT COMES TO THE ISSUE OF PRONOUNS -- WOULD YOU LIKE ME TO --
- 19:25>> Steve: YES, BRIEFLY, IF YOU WOULD, BECAUSE KYLE HAS BEEN THE MOST PATIENT PERSON IN THE WORLD
- 19:30WAITING FOR HIS CHANCE TO GET IN.
- 19:31SO, YES, YOU FINISH YOUR STATEMENT, AND THEN I'M GOING TO GET TO KYLE.
- 19:36>> Theryn Meyer: OKAY.
- 19:37MY APOLOGIES.
- 19:38FIRST OF ALL, I HAVE A LOT OF SYMPATHY FOR PEOPLE WHO WANT TO BE REFERRED TO BY THEIR
- 19:43PRONOUNS.
- 19:44OBVIOUSLY AS A TRANS WOMAN, I KNOW WHAT IT FEELS LIKE TO BE MISGENDERED AND WHATNOT.
- 19:51MOST PEOPLE ARE REASONABLE IN THE SENSE THAT THEY WOULD BE REASONABLE ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE
- 19:58TRANS PEOPLE AND THEIR PREFERRED PRONOUNS, AND I'M SURE -- I MEAN, I WOULD HOPE THAT IF I
- 20:04WERE A STUDENT OF DR. PETERSON THAT HE WOULD REFER TO ME AS "SHE" AND WOULDN'T HAVE A
- 20:10PROBLEM WITH THAT.
- 20:11BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY, YOU KNOW, A PERSONAL PRONOUN PREFERENCE IS STILL A PREFERENCE
- 20:15FOR WHAT LANGUAGE OTHER PEOPLE USE, AND AT THE END OF THE DAY, I DON'T HAVE ULTIMATE CONTROL
- 20:22OVER WHAT DR. PETERSON -- THE LANGUAGE HE WOULD CHOOSE TO USE OR ANYBODY ELSE FOR THAT MATTER.
- 20:27THAT'S UP TO THEM.
- 20:27>> Steve: LET ME FIND OUT THEN.
- 20:30IF SHE WERE A STUDENT OF YOURS, WHAT WOULD YOU CALL HER?
- 20:33>> Jordan Peterson: SHE.
- 20:34>> Steve: YOU WOULD.
- 20:35OKAY.
- 20:35WE'VE ESTABLISHED THAT.
- 20:37THERYN, STAND BY FOR A SECOND NOW.
- 20:39I DO WANT -- THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE, PROFESSOR KIRKUP.
- 20:43I WANT TO BRING YOU IN NOW BECAUSE, AS I SUGGESTED EARLIER, IN NEW YORK CITY THEY HAVE
- 20:49IDENTIFIED 31 GENDER IDENTITIES AND APPARENTLY THE LAW DOWN THERE SUGGESTS THAT IF
- 20:53BUSINESSES DON'T ACCOMMODATE, AN INDIVIDUAL'S CHOSEN GENDER IDENTITY, THERE IS THE RISK OF A
- 20:59SIX-FIGURE FINE UNDER THE RULES OF THE CITY'S COMMISSIONER OF HUMAN RIGHTS.
- 21:03WE HAVE, IN THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO, OUR OWN ONTARIO HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, AND I WONDER
- 21:09HOW SIMILAR OUR LEGISLATION IS HERE ON THIS ISSUE COMPARED TO WHAT THEY HAVE IN NEW YORK CITY.
- 21:15>> Kyle Kirkup: SO WHERE I WOULD START THE DISCUSSION IS TO ACTUALLY POINT THAT, YOU KNOW,
- 21:19EVEN THOUGH WE'RE TALKING ABOUT ADDING GENDER IDENTITY AND GENDER EXPRESSION TO THE
- 21:23CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS ACT AND PROVISIONS OF THE CRIMINAL CODE, THIS IS A LONGSTANDING PRACTICE
- 21:29IN CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS JURISPRUDENCE.
- 21:32YOU CAN GO BACK INTO THE LATE 1990s.
- 21:34AND THE CASES WE'RE SEEING IN THE TRIBUNALS ARE NOT THE KIND OF EXTREME EXAMPLES OF A NUMBER
- 21:39OF DIFFERENT KINDS OF GENDER PRONOUNCE.
- 21:41WHAT WE'RE SEEING IS REALLY MORE BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS QUESTIONS.
- 21:45SO QUESTIONS LIKE, ARE YOU REQUIRED TO UNDERGO SURGERY IN ORDER TO HAVE AN IDENTITY
- 21:52DOCUMENT THAT PROPERLY CAPTURES WHO YOU ARE AS A PERSON?
- 21:56DISCRIMINATION IN POLICING CONTEXTS.
- 21:58DISCRIMINATION IN THE WORKPLACE.
- 21:59AND SO I THINK THE PRONOUN ISSUE IS REALLY A RED HERRING.
- 22:02WHEN YOU LOOK THROUGH THE JURISPRUDENCE DATING BACK TO THE 1990s, WE'RE SEEING MUCH MORE
- 22:08FUNDAMENTAL QUESTIONS, REALLY BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS QUESTIONS THAT ARE COMING BEFORE THE
- 22:13TRIBUNALS, AND HAVING REVIEWED THE CASE LAW, I'M NOT SEEING THE KIND OF NEW YORK SCENARIO THAT
- 22:19YOU'RE PROPOSING AT ALL.
- 22:20>> Steve: WELL, LET ME READ SOME OF THE ONTARIO HUMAN RIGHTS CODE TO YOU, AND THEN I'LL GET
- 22:25YOUR FEEDBACK ON THAT.
- 22:27DISCRIMINATION, THE HUMAN RIGHTS CODE SAYS, HAPPENS ...
- 23:00>> Steve: AGAIN, KYLE, I'LL GET YOU TO FOLLOW UP ON THAT, INASMUCH AS, IF A TRANS PERSON
- 23:07OR SOMEBODY WHOSE GENDER IDENTITY WAS MORE, SHALL WE SAY, COMPLICATED THAN THE MALE-FEMALE
- 23:12THAT WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT SO FAR, AND THE PRONOUN USED TO DESCRIBE THAT PERSON WERE NOT
- 23:18TRADITIONAL, WOULD THE PERSON HAVE A CASE BEFORE THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION?
- 23:23>> Kyle Kirkup: SO WE HAVEN'T SEEN CASES ON THAT AT THIS POINT, BUT I WOULD SAY
- 23:27ABSOLUTELY, AS A GENERAL RULE THAT YOU SHOULD BE THINKING ABOUT IN TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT
- 23:32SETTINGS, ABSOLUTELY RESPECTING A TRANS PERSON'S PRONOUN CHOICE IS REALLY FUNDAMENTAL, AND I CAN
- 23:37ALSO SAY THAT IN LOTS OF CIRCUMSTANCES, A PRONOUN MAY NOT EVEN BE REQUIRED.
- 23:42THERE ARE LOTS OF CREATIVE WAYS TO AVOID USING GENDER PRONOUNS AT ALL.
- 23:48SO I THINK THAT -- BUT WHEN YOU ACTUALLY LOOK AT THE CASES THAT ARE COMING BEFORE TRIBUNALS,
- 23:53WE'RE NOT SEEING THAT TO BE REALLY THE PRIMARY ISSUE.
- 23:57IT'S MUCH MORE BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS QUESTIONS, WHICH IS WHAT THE FEDERAL LEGISLATION HERE,
- 24:02BILL C-16, TRIES TO ACCOMPLISH.
- 24:03>> Steve: ALL RIGHT.
- 24:04I THINK WE'VE SET THE TABLE NOW.
- 24:05YOU WANT TO GET IN ON THIS NOW, I CAN TELL.
- 24:08YOU'VE HEARD WHAT THE PROFESSOR HAS HAD TO SAY.
- 24:10WHAT'S YOUR RESPONSE?
- 24:12>> Jordan Peterson: WELL, I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT THE CLAIM THAT THERE'S NO SUCH THING AS
- 24:16BIOLOGICAL SEX MEANS, AND I CERTAINLY THINK IT'S -- LET'S CALL IT AN ERROR TO SUGGEST THAT
- 24:21THERE'S SOME SORT OF SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS ABOUT THAT.
- 24:24I MEAN, THERE'S BIOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MALES AND FEMALES IN ANIMALS AND HUMAN
- 24:31BEINGS AT EVERY LEVEL OF ANALYSIS, FROM -- >> Steve: I'M JUMPING IN HERE.
- 24:34WHAT ABOUT THE NOTION HE PUT FORWARD AT THE END THERE, THAT IF YOU DO NOT REFER TO PEOPLE
- 24:37WITH THE PRONOUN THAT THEY PREFER TO BE REFERRED TO, THAT IS A FORM, ACCORDING TO THE
- 24:42HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, OF DISCRIMINATION?
- 24:45>> Jordan Peterson: IT'S NOT JUST A FORM OF DISCRIMINATION, IT'S A FORM OF HATE SPEECH.
- 24:49THAT'S WHY I MADE THE VIDEO.
- 24:50I SAID THAT WE WERE IN DANGER OF PLACING THE REFUSAL TO USE CERTAIN KINDS OF LANGUAGE INTO
- 24:55THE SAME CATEGORY AS HOLOCAUST DENIAL AND SUGGESTED THAT MAYBE THAT WASN'T SUCH A GOOD IDEA,
- 25:01ESPECIALLY SINCE THERE'S PLENTY OF DEBATE TO BE HAD ABOUT GENDER ISSUES IN OUR SOCIETY, WHICH I
- 25:05ALSO THINK ARE ALSO IN DANGER OF BECOMING ILLEGAL AND QUITE RAPIDLY.
- 25:10SO IT ISN'T CLEAR TO ME HOW LONG WE'LL BE ABLE TO HAVE THE TALK WE'RE HAVING RIGHT NOW.
- 25:17>> CAN I JUMP IN ON THERE -- I THINK IT'S A COMMON MISCONCEPTION ABOUT BILL C-16,
- 25:23THAT IT'S SOMEHOW GOING TO MAKE PRONOUN USE INTO HATE SPEECH.
- 25:26IF YOU ACTUALLY LOOK AT THE PROVISIONS, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT VERY MINOR AMENDMENTS TO THE
- 25:32CRIMINAL CODE -- >> Jordan Peterson: THEY'RE NOT MINOR.
- 25:33THEY PUT IT INTO THE HATE SPEECH CATEGORY.
- 25:36THEY'RE NOT MINOR AT ALL.
- 25:37THAT'S A MISSTATEMENT.
- 25:39DON'T TELL ME THEY'RE MINOR.
- 25:42THAT'S NOT RIGHT.
- 25:44>> Kyle Kirkup: SO SECTION -- PARDON ME.
- 25:47SO SECTION 318 SETS OUT A SERIES OF IDENTIFIABLE GROUPS, AND WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE CLEAREST
- 25:52OF CASES.
- 25:52THE CASES OF ADVOCATING GENOCIDE.
- 25:56WE HAVE A SERIES OF GROUPS THAT ARE ALREADY IDENTIFIED IN THE CODE, AND ALL THIS DOES IS ADD
- 26:01GENDER IDENTITY AND GENDER EXPRESSION TO THE CATEGORIES THAT ARE ALREADY IDENTIFIED.
- 26:04AND SO I THINK WE REALLY HAVE TO ADD SOME REASONABLENESS TO THIS DISCUSSION.
- 26:10ACTUALLY CLEARLY ARTICULATE WHAT THE PROVISION DOES.
- 26:12>> Steve: LET ME BE A LITTLE CLEARER ABOUT WHAT SOME OF THE PROBLEMS -- WHAT YOU MIGHT BE
- 26:17ASKING FOR IF YOU WANT TO DO THIS.
- 26:19FOR EXAMPLE, AND, SHELDON, BOTTOM OF PAGE 3 HERE.
- 26:22LET'S PUT THIS GRAPHIC UP.
- 26:43>> Steve: JORDAN, YOU'RE NOT GOING TO GO TO JAIL IF YOU KEEP THIS UP.
- 26:46DO YOU FIND THAT REASSURING?
- 26:48>> Jordan Peterson: WHAT IF I DON'T PAY THE FINE?
- 26:49>> Steve: THEN WHAT?
- 26:50>> Jordan Peterson: THEN WHAT?
- 26:51AND LET'S TALK ABOUT THE LEGALITIES FOR A MINUTE.
- 26:53AS YOU KNOW, THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO SENT ME TWO WARNING LETTERS, RIGHT?
- 26:58AND THE SECOND ONE BASICALLY ASKED ME TO STOP TALKING ABOUT THIS.
- 27:00>> Steve: WHO SENT THE LETTERS?
- 27:02>> Jordan Peterson: THE FIRST -- IT'S THE ADMINISTRATION, FUNDAMENTALLY,
- 27:05THE HIGHER-UP PEOPLE IN THE ADMINISTRATION.
- 27:07THE LAST ONE WAS THE DEAN OF THE FACULTY OF ARTS AND SCIENCE.
- 27:11BUT, YOU KNOW, IT'S COMING FROM THE TOP END OF THE UNIVERSITY.
- 27:13>> Steve: AND THE LETTER SAID ESSENTIALLY YOU MUST CALL PEOPLE BY THE PRONOUNS THEY WANT?
- 27:18>> Jordan Peterson: THE LETTERS BASICALLY SAID THAT -- AND THIS IS PARAPHRASING,
- 27:22OBVIOUSLY -- THAT I'M REQUIRED TO ABIDE BY THE UNIVERSITY POLICIES AND THE ONTARIO HUMAN
- 27:27RIGHTS CODE.
- 27:28THERE'S A STRONG IMPLICATION IN THE LETTER, BY HAVING THIS DISCUSSION, THAT I WASN'T DOING
- 27:32SO.
- 27:32AND THEY'RE ASKING ME TO STOP.
- 27:34AND I CAN TELL YOU ALSO WHY THEY'RE TELLING ME TO STOP APART FROM THAT.
- 27:38THE CODES AS WRITTEN MAKE THE UNIVERSITY JUST AS LIABLE FOR MY SPEECH AS I AM.
- 27:44SO NOT ONLY IS THERE A REASONABLE POSSIBILITY THAT WHAT I'M DOING IS UTTERING HATE
- 27:48SPEECH NOW UNDER OUR LAW, BUT THE UNIVERSITY IS LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THAT.
- 27:52AND SO I THINK THEY CONSULTED WITH THEIR LAWYERS AND DECIDED THAT MAYBE THE CLAIM THAT I WAS
- 27:56MAKING IN MY VIDEO WAS CORRECT, THAT -- AND SO I DON'T REGARD THAT AS TRIVIAL, AND I THINK THE
- 28:03LAWYER WHO IS DISCUSSING THIS IS DOWNPLAYING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF IT TREMENDOUSLY.
- 28:10>> Nicholas Matte: CAN I SPEAK TO THE CLIMATE OF THIS BECAUSE I DON'T AGREE WHICH DR. PETERSON
- 28:15HAS BEEN ASKED TO STOP ABUSING STUDENTS ON CAMPUS.
- 28:19>> Jordan Peterson: TO STOP WHAT?
- 28:21>> Nicholas Matte: ABUSING STUDENTS AND OTHERS IN OUR COMMUNITY WHO DESERVE RESPECT
- 28:25AND TO LEARN AND CONTRIBUTE TO SOCIETY IN A PLACE WHERE, IF THEY ARE PHYSICALLY ASSAULTED,
- 28:32IF THEY ARE -- >> Jordan Peterson: THE ASSAULT SO FAR CAME FROM THE
- 28:34SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIORS WHO WERE AT THE FREE SPEECH RALLY AND ALMOST TWO MILLION PEOPLE HAVE
- 28:38WATCHED IT SO FAR.
- 28:39>> Nicholas Matte: THIS IS NOT ACCURATE.
- 28:40>> Jordan Peterson: WELL, YOU CAN LOOK AT THE VIDEOS YOURSELF.
- 28:43>> Nicholas Matte: BECAUSE PEOPLE HAVE BEEN MAKING COMPLAINTS ABOUT YOUR BEHAVIOUR.
- 28:46>> Jordan Peterson: YES, I UNDERSTAND THAT.
- 28:48>> Steve: CAN I JUST BE CLEAR ON SOMETHING HERE -- >> Nicholas Matte: THE
- 28:52OPPORTUNITY FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE HAPPENING, WHAT MANY PEOPLE WON'T UNDERSTAND.
- 28:54>> Steve: NICK, CAN I BE CLEAR OF SOMETHING?
- 28:57YOU'VE ACCUSED HIM OF ABUSING STUDENTS BY NOT USING PRONOUNS.
- 29:01>> Nicholas Matte: THAT'S HOW I SEE IT.
- 29:02>> Steve: THAT IS TANTAMOUNT TO ABUSE, IN YOUR VIEW?
- 29:05>> Nicholas Matte: ABSOLUTELY.
- 29:07MANY -- >> Jordan Peterson: IS IT TANTAMOUNT TO VIOLENCE?
- 29:11>> Nicholas Matte: YES.
- 29:11>> Jordan Peterson: HOW ABOUT HATE SPEECH?
- 29:13>> Nicholas Matte: OF COURSE IT'S HATE SPEECH.
- 29:14YOU WON'T REFER TO THEM IN A WAY THAT RECOGNIZES THEIR HUMANITY AND DIGNITY.
- 29:18>> Steve: MARY, LET ME GET YOU IN ON THIS AT THIS POINT.
- 29:22>> Mary Rogan: SURE.
- 29:22>> Steve: DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING THAT YOU WANT TO SAY OR CAN I PUT A QUESTION TO YOU?
- 29:27>> Mary Rogan: BOTH.
- 29:28>> Steve: YOU'RE A WRITER.
- 29:30I KNOW YOU CARE ABOUT FREE SPEECH BECAUSE YOU'RE A WRITER.
- 29:32>> Mary Rogan: YES.
- 29:33>> Steve: DOES JORDAN PETERSON HAVE A LITTLE PLACE IN YOUR HEART BECAUSE HE'S ARGUING FREE
- 29:38SPEECH HERE?
- 29:39>> Mary Rogan: THE INTERESTING THING ABOUT JORDAN AND HOW I FEEL ABOUT HIS VIDEO AND JORDAN
- 29:42AND I ACTUALLY HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO TALK AT LENGTH BEFORE I WROTE THE WALRUS
- 29:47ARTICLE, AND HE SAILS VERY CLOSE TO THINGS THAT PEOPLE CAN RELATE TO AND I THINK WE ALL WANT TO
- 29:53HAVE AN OPEN DISCOURSE, WE WANT CONVERSATIONS TO UNFOLD, WE WANT PEOPLE TO FEEL, IF THEY HAVE
- 29:58SOMETHING TO SAY, IF THEY HAVE A QUESTION, THEY CAN ASK IT, THEY'RE NOT GOING TO BE CENSORED
- 30:05BUT HE SAILS CLOSE AND RIGHT PAST IT AND THAT'S WHERE HE AND I PART WAYS.
- 30:10WHAT I DON'T REALLY UNDERSTAND IS WHEN YOU LISTEN TO THE VIDEO, HE PILES A LOT OF THINGS INTO
- 30:16THE BASKET OF USING THE PRONOUNS THAT PEOPLE WANT, AND IT SEEMS TO ME -- AND YOU CAN CORRECT ME
- 30:22IF I'M WRONG -- BUT ONE OF HIS ANXIETIES, AND HE TALKS ABOUT BEING FEARFUL AND ANXIOUS IN HIS
- 30:28VIDEO, THAT SOMEHOW THERE'S A CABAL OF TRANS ACTIVISTS THAT HAVE SO MUCH POWER THAT THEY'RE
- 30:38GOING TO BASICALLY, YOU KNOW, USING THE PRONOUNS THAT PEOPLE WANT AND CAPITULATING TO THESE
- 30:44DEMANDS SORT OF PULLS OUT THE CRITICAL GENGA PIECE OF THE WESTERN CANNON, BASICALLY JORDAN
- 30:52IS ARGUING THIS IS GOING TO CREATE CHAOS AND ANARCHY AND IT'S ESSENTIALLY A MARXIST PLOT
- 31:00THAT IS THERE TO SOW VIOLENCE AND THERE TO SOW CONFUSION AND TOPPLE ANY KIND OF HIERARCHY.
- 31:07>> Steve: CAN I JUST JUMP IN THERE FOR A SECOND?
- 31:10IS THAT AN ACCURATE CHARACTERIZATION?
- 31:13>> Mary Rogan: I LISTENED CLOSELY TO THAT TAPE.
- 31:15I THINK IT IS.
- 31:15>> Steve: HAS SHE ACCURATELY CHARACTERIZED WHERE YOU'RE COMING FROM?
- 31:20>> Jordan Peterson: IT'S NOT A TRANSSEXUAL CABAL BY ANY STRETCH OF THE IMAGINATION.
- 31:25IS IT A CABAL OF RADICAL LEFT WINGERS?
- 31:28YES, IT IS.
- 31:29THEY'VE BEEN ACTIVE BEHIND AND IN FRONT OF THE SCENES INCREASINGLY OVER THE LAST 30
- 31:33YEARS.
- 31:33AND MY ESTIMATION IS THAT DEPARTMENTS LIKE WOMEN'S STUDIES HAVE TRAINED BETWEEN 300,000 AND
- 31:393 MILLION RADICAL LEFT-WING ACTIVISTS AND THEY'RE -- >> Mary Rogan: AND THEY'RE ALL
- 31:44UNDERPAID, SO DON'T WORRY.
- 31:45>> Jordan Peterson: THEY COULD PICK HIGHER PAYING OCCUPATIONS IF THEY WANTED HIGHER PAYING
- 31:51OCCUPATIONS.
- 31:52>> Nicholas Matte: BECAUSE SEXISM DOES NOT EXIST.
- 31:54ARE YOU KIDDING ME?
- 31:55>> Steve: LET'S NOT GET OFF-TOPIC HERE, FOLKS.
- 31:59>> Nicholas Matte: THAT'S DEFINITELY ON POINT -- >> Mary Rogan: I THINK JORDAN
- 32:04HAS CONCEDED -- I THINK I HAVE GRASPED HIS CONCERN, AT THE VERY LEAST I'VE GRASPED HIS CONCERN
- 32:11AND THERE IS A KIND OF CHIPPING AWAY AT ORDER AS WE'VE COME TO KNOW IT.
- 32:15THE OTHER THING JORDAN AND I HAVE IN COMMON IS A REAL INTEREST IN LANGUAGE AND THE
- 32:20IDEA OF WHAT CAN HAPPEN WHEN LANGUAGE CHANGES, WHEN IT EVOLVES, AND, YOU KNOW, I WAS
- 32:26THINKING, BEFORE I CAME HERE, I WAS THINKING ABOUT -- I GREW UP IN THE BRONX AND I WAS BORN IN
- 32:33'61, SO I REMEMBER VERY WELL WHEN WE WENT FROM MRS. TO MS. AND MY FATHER WAS APPALLED
- 32:39AND HE KEPT SAYING, MS. , AND HE THOUGHT THAT WAS FUNNY, BECAUSE IF YOU COULDN'T ACTUALLY
- 32:45IDENTIFY SOMEBODY AS EITHER, PARTICULARLY A FEMALE, AS EITHER MARRIED OR SINGLE, THEN CHAOS,
- 32:53RIGHT?
- 32:53>> Steve:
- 32:59IT IS APPARENTLY VERY CONFUSING AND I'M REMINDED OF THAT, WHEN THE SUGGESTION IS MADE THAT
- 33:05SOMEHOW, IF WE HAVE WORDS THAT DON'T FIT INTO SOMETHING THAT WE'RE VERY FAMILIAR WITH AND
- 33:10THAT WE'VE USED TO DATE, THAT CHAOS WILL ENSUE, THAT EVERYONE WILL BE CONFUSED.
- 33:16I DON'T BELIEVE THAT.
- 33:17THERE'S NO EVIDENCE OF THAT HISTORICALLY.
- 33:18>> Steve: I HEAR YOU.
- 33:19BUT THERE WAS NO LAW OBLIGING PEOPLE TO USE -- >> Mary Rogan: BUT THERE WERE
- 33:23LAWS TO OBLIGE PEOPLE TO CHANGE THE WAY THAT WE REFERRED TO BLACK PEOPLE, FOR EXAMPLE.
- 33:31YOU KNOW, THERE WAS A TIME WHEN THERE WERE ANY NUMBER OF WORDS THAT WE CAN NOW ONLY SAY AS
- 33:38LETTERS -- CAN I SAY THEM ON TVO?
- 33:40PEOPLE WERE CALLED DARKIES, NIGGERS, COONS, IN POLITE COMPANY.
- 33:46THAT EVOLVED.
- 33:48THOSE THINGS CHANGED.
- 33:48WHEN I WAS A TEENAGER, PEOPLE WERE STILL USING THOSE WORDS.
- 33:51>> Steve: THIS IS A NATURAL EVOLUTION, IN YOUR VIEW?
- 33:53>> Mary Rogan: THIS IS A NATURAL EVOLUTION AND CHAOS WILL NOT ENSUE.
- 33:56>> Jordan Peterson: IF IT'S A NATURAL EVOLUTION, WE DON'T NEED HATE SPEECH LAWS TO ENFORCE IT.
- 34:01>> Mary Rogan: OBVIOUSLY WE DO.
- 34:02WE CAN DRIVE SOCIAL CHANGE AND IT DOESN'T ALL HAVE TO LEAD TO CHAOS, IS MY POINT.
- 34:07WE HAVE SEEN THE FLIP SIDE OF JORDAN'S ARGUMENT, I THINK, WE DO HAVE AN HISTORICAL RECORD OF
- 34:14THAT, SO WHEN IT WAS LEFT TO OTHERS TO NAME PEOPLE, WE LOST INDIGENOUS NAMES.
- 34:18I COME FROM -- MY MOTHER IS FROM IRELAND.
- 34:20SHE WAS FROM A GENERATION WHO FINALLY GOT TO LEARN HER OWN LANGUAGE AGAIN.
- 34:24SHE COULDN'T SPEAK GAELIC TO HER PARENTS BECAUSE THEY HADN'T BEEN ALLOWED TO SPEAK IT.
- 34:28WE'VE SEEN THE EFFECT WHEN PEOPLE CAN'T USE THEIR OWN LANGUAGE, WHEN THEY CAN'T USE
- 34:32THEIR OWN NAMES.
- 34:33>> Steve: LET ME GET JORDAN TO RESPOND TO THAT.
- 34:37A NATURAL EVOLUTION.
- 34:38>> Jordan Peterson: LOOK, WORDS ARE TOOLS.
- 34:39MAYBE THAT WAS ONE OF THE GREAT PHILOSOPHICAL DISCOVERIES OF THE 20TH CENTURY.
- 34:44AND THAT MEANS -- AND PEOPLE ARE ALWAYS LOOKING FOR NEW TOOLS TO OPERATE IN THE WORLD.
- 34:48AND IF YOU INVENT A GOOD TOOL, LIKE A NEW WORD, THEN PEOPLE WILL PICK IT UP JUST AS FAST AS
- 34:54THEY POSSIBLY CAN.
- 34:54YOU REALLY SEE THAT IN ENGLISH.
- 34:56BUT THE WORDS THAT ARE BEING REQUIRED NOW ARE NOT GOOD TOOLS AND THAT'S WHY PEOPLE AREN'T
- 35:01USING THEM.
- 35:01AND SO INSTEAD WHAT WE HAVE IS THE USE OF FORCE DESPITE THE FACT THAT THAT'S BEING DENIED,
- 35:06ALTHOUGH WE'VE ALREADY ESTABLISHED THAT AT LEAST IN THE OPINION OF ONE OF THE PEOPLE ON
- 35:10THIS PANEL, I'M ALREADY GUILTY OF A HATE CRIME, WHICH IS WHAT I SAID I WAS GUILTY OF WHEN I MADE
- 35:15THAT VIDEO.
- 35:15STEVE, THE ISSUE WITH THE LAW IS QUITE STRAIGHTFORWARD.
- 35:19THE GOVERNMENT IS RESPONDING -- IS REQUIRING US TO USE CERTAIN LANGUAGE.
- 35:23THAT'S NOT THE SAME AS NOT USING CERTAIN LANGUAGE.
- 35:25AND IT'S A LINE -- AND THIS IS THE FUNDAMENTAL ISSUE.
- 35:28THIS IS MAYBE THE FUNDAMENTAL ISSUE.
- 35:29THAT'S A LINE WE SHOULD NOT CROSS.
- 35:31WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW THE GOVERNMENT TO DECIDE WHICH WORDS WE'RE ALLOWED TO USE.
- 35:36IT'S A MISTAKE.
- 35:37AND IT'S A MISTAKE THAT STRIKES RIGHT AT THE HEART OF FREE SPEECH, AND THE THING ABOUT FREE
- 35:41SPEECH IS THAT IT'S NOT THE RIGHT TO CRITICIZE YOUR LEADERS, WHICH IS WHAT PEOPLE USUALLY
- 35:48CHARACTERIZE IT AS.
- 35:49FREE SPEECH IS FREEDOM TO ENGAGE IN THE PROS SELVES THAT WE USE TO -- PROCESSES WE USE TO
- 35:54FORMULATE THE PROBLEMS IN OUR SOCIETY, TO GENERATE SOLUTIONS TO THEM AND REACH A CONSENSUS.
- 35:59IT'S ACTUALLY A MECHANISM.
- 36:01IT'S NOT JUST ANOTHER VALUE.
- 36:03YOU SHOULD PUT CONSTRAINTS ON FREE SPEECH WITH THE MOST EXTREME CAUTION BECAUSE YOU
- 36:07INTERFERE WITH PEOPLE'S ABILITY TO THINK AND COMMUNICATE.
- 36:09>> Steve: LET ME GET THERYN TO WEIGH IN.
- 36:11YOU'VE BEEN HEARING THE DEBATE IN THE STUDIO.
- 36:13WHY DON'T YOU WEIGH IN AND PICK IT UP?
- 36:15>> Theryn Meyer: I GUESS I'M IN THE SAME BOAT AS DR. PETERSON WHEN IT COMES TO BEING GUILTY OF
- 36:21A HATE CRIME OR, SORRY, HATE SPEECH INFRINGEMENT BECAUSE, I MEAN, I DRAW THE LAW SOMEWHERE.
- 36:26FOR EXAMPLE, I REFUSE TO USE PRONOUNS LIKE THESE AND THEIR.
- 36:33I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM USING THEY AND THEIR PRONOUNCE AND THAT MAY BE BECAUSE OF THE
- 36:39CIRCLES I'M IN, I KNOW PEOPLE WHO USE GENDER NEUTRAL PRONOUNCE, I'VE GOTTEN USED TO
- 36:44IT.
- 36:44BUT THE VAST MAJORITY OF PEOPLE ARE NOT GOING TO COME INTO CONTACT WITH THE INCREDIBLY
- 36:49SMALL FRACTION OF THE POPULATION OF GENDER NON-BINARY PEOPLE.
- 36:52AND THAT'S WHY THIS -- IT'S NEVER REALLY GOING TO PICK UP, IN MY OPINION, WHEN IT COMES TO
- 36:59MRS. AND MS. , AT LEAST HALF OF THE POPULATION IS FEMALE, SO THERE WAS SOME INTERACTION WITH
- 37:08THE TERM MRS. VERSUS MS. .
- 37:12AND THERE WERE SOME INTERACTIONS SO PEOPLE COULD PICK IT UP.
- 37:15THERE AREN'T ENOUGH GENDER NON-BINARY, I USE THAT IN QUOTATION MARKS BECAUSE I HATE
- 37:20THAT TERM BECAUSE IT'S A POLITICAL TERM, NOT A GENDER IDENTITY OR A TERM OF
- 37:26IDENTIFICATION, IT'S JUST A POLITICAL TERM THAT, REGARDLESS, I DON'T THINK IT'S GOING TO PICK
- 37:32UP.
- 37:32THERE'S JUST NOT ENOUGH OF THESE PEOPLE TO INTERACT WITH.
- 37:34>> Steve: THE TWITTERSPHERE HAS BEEN BUZZING WITH THIS CONVERSATION.
- 37:43LET'S PULL UP ONE TWEET.
- 37:44THIS WAS TWEETED TO A NUMBER OF PEOPLE, AS YOU CAN SEE IN THE MIDDLE, JORDAN PETERSON WHO IS
- 37:51ON OUR PROGRAM TONIGHT ...
- 37:55>> Steve: THERE ARE PEOPLE, LET'S GO TO PROFESSOR KYLE IN OTTAWA.
- 37:59THERE ARE PEOPLE OUT THERE WHO HOPE THAT C-16 LIVES UP TO JORDAN'S WORST FEARS.
- 38:03DO YOU AGREE THAT C-16 OUGHT TO BE ABLE TO PREVENT PEOPLE FROM EXPRESSING NEGATIVE OPINIONS
- 38:11ABOUT TRANSGENDER PEOPLE?
- 38:14>> Kyle Kirkup: FIRST I WANT TO CLARIFY THAT BILL C-16 ONLY APPLIES TO FEDERALLY REGULATED
- 38:18ENTITIES.
- 38:19FOR EXAMPLE, THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO IS UNDER PROVINCIAL JURISDICTION, SO IS THEREFORE
- 38:24SUBJECT TO THE ONTARIO HUMAN RIGHTS CODE.
- 38:26I THINK THAT'S AN IMPORTANT POINT TO NOTE.
- 38:28I ALSO WANT TO NOTE, THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF TALK ABOUT HATE CRIMES.
- 38:32IT SEEMS TO BE LIKE KIND OF AN AMERICAN IMPORT INTO OUR DISCUSSION.
- 38:37THE ONLY TWO CHANGES THAT THIS BILL C-16 MAKE ARE TO MAKE MINOR AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 318 AND
- 38:44718 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE.
- 38:45THE FIRST IS ADVOCATING GENOCIDE.
- 38:47AS I'VE TALKED ABOUT, A VERY, VERY EXTREME, HIGH STANDARD.
- 38:50AND SECOND OFF, AT SENTENCING, AFTER AN OFFENCE HAS BEEN COMMITTED AND A PERSON HAS BEEN
- 38:54FOUND GUILTY, WHAT 718 DOES IS IT TELLS JUDGES THAT THEY OUGHT TO TREAT HATE MOTIVATION AS AN
- 39:03AGGRAVATING FACTOR AT SENTENCING, TO TREAT THAT AS A MORE SEVERE FORM.
- 39:07CURRENTLY WE HAVE A SERIES OF IDENTITIES THAT ARE SET OUT IN 718, THINGS LIKE SEXUAL
- 39:13ORIENTATION, RACE.
- 39:14WE DON'T HAVE CURRENTLY GENDER IDENTITY AND GENDER EXPRESSION THERE.
- 39:19I JUST WANT TO MAKE IT VERY CLEAR THAT WE OUGHT NOT TO BE IMPORTING AMERICAN CONCEPTS INTO
- 39:26THE DISCUSSION HERE.
- 39:27>> Steve: UNDERSTOOD.
- 39:28>> Kyle Kirkup: SO TO THE EXTENT THAT BILL C-16 MAKES CHANGES, ONLY TO, IN THE
- 39:33CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS ACT CONTEXT, TWO FEDERALLY REGULATED ENTITIES, WHICH IS NOT THE
- 39:39UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO.
- 39:39>> Steve: NICHOLAS, LET ME FOLLOW UP WITH YOU.
- 39:41WHY, IN YOUR VIEW, DO YOU THINK THE TRANS COMMUNITY NEEDS THIS SORT OF LEGISLATIVE PROTECTION?
- 39:46>> Nicholas Matte: THANK YOU.
- 39:46THAT'S BASICALLY THE POINT THAT HASN'T BEEN RAISED HERE WHICH IS THAT PEOPLE ARE ACTUALLY
- 39:51SUFFERING HUGE LACK OF ACCESS TO RESOURCES THAT WILL ALLOW PEOPLE TO SURVIVE.
- 39:55SO PEOPLE ARE BEING PHYSICALLY ASSAULTED.
- 39:57PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE COUNSELLORS THAT THEY CAN GO TO WHO ARE NOT GOING TO, AS DR. PETERSON HAS
- 40:04DONE ON YouTube, RECOMMEND THAT THEY ACTUALLY BECOME MORE ANXIOUS AND MORE UPSET ABOUT
- 40:10SITUATIONS.
- 40:11PEOPLE ARE BEING ASSAULTED.
- 40:12I BROUGHT ALL SORTS OF REALLY DEPRESSING STATS THAT PEOPLE WHO ARE LEANING TOWARDS THINKING
- 40:20THAT THIS IS NOT THAT BIG OF A DEAL, THOSE PEOPLE NEED TO LOOK AT THOSE STATS.
- 40:25>> Steve: GIVE US ONE STAT.
- 40:27>> Nicholas Matte: YEAH.
- 40:29SO 58% OF STUDENTS COULD NOT GET ACADEMIC TRANSCRIPTS WITH THEIR CORRECT NAME OR PRONOUN.
- 40:34THAT CAUSES A HUGE CHAIN OF EVENTS FOR STUDENTS OR ANYBODY WHO HAS HAD ANY KIND OF ACADEMIC
- 40:39TRAINING.
- 40:40AS EVERYONE RECOGNIZES, WE NEED TO BE ABLE TO HAVE REFERENCES, WE NEED TO BE ABLE TO HAVE
- 40:44RéSUMéS, WE NEED TO BE ABLE TO GET JOBS.
- 40:47>> Steve: I WANT TO BE SURE THAT I'M CLEAR -- I'M CLEARLY UNDERSTANDING YOUR POINT HERE,
- 40:52WHICH IS, AND THEREFORE THEY FEEL DISRESPECTED AND THEREFORE THIS AFFECTS THEIR LIFE IN A
- 40:57VERY REAL WAY?
- 40:57IS THAT RIGHT?
- 40:58>> Nicholas Matte: THE FEELING OF DISRESPECT IS NOT AS IMPORTANT AS THE WAYS THAT
- 41:02PEOPLE IN AUTHORITY ARE ABLE TO CIRCUMVENT THE POSSIBILITIES FOR LIVING.
- 41:06SO IT HAS MORE TO DO WITH NOT BEING ABLE TO FIND HOUSING AND THEREFORE BEING HOMELESS, HAVE
- 41:11MORE TO DO WITH NOT BEING ABLE TO GET JOBS BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE DISCRIMINATED AGAINST.
- 41:15SO WE'RE NOT ACTUALLY -- WE SHOULDN'T BE TALKING ABOUT FREE SPEECH.
- 41:18WHAT WE SHOULD BE TALKING ABOUT ARE THE SOCIAL ISSUES FACING PEOPLE WHO ARE BEING
- 41:23DISCRIMINATED AGAINST AND WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE ON CAMPUS, WHICH IS THAT SOME PROFESSORS REFUSE
- 41:30TO OFFER BASIC DIGNITY TO STUDENTS AND COLLEAGUES, AND THAT LEADS TO PEOPLE MISSING
- 41:34CLASSES, IT LEADS TO PEOPLE DROPPING OUT, IT LEADS TO A LACK OF POSITIVE OPPORTUNITY FOR
- 41:40SOCIETY TO ACTUALLY BENEFIT FROM THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF MANY, MANY PEOPLE.
- 41:44AND I ALSO DON'T TEACH THAT THERE'S A HUGE DIVIDE BETWEEN TRANS AND NON-TRANS PEOPLE,
- 41:52BECAUSE I WOULD SAY THAT 100 PERCENT OF PEOPLE WILL BENEFIT FROM MORE OPEN
- 43:12AND THAT'S WHY THIS HAS TURNED INTO THE CONFLAGRATION IT HAS?
- 43:15>> Jordan Peterson: IT'S PARTLY THAT BECAUSE THE ISSUES WE'RE DISCUSSING HAVE TO CENTRE
- 43:19ON ACTUAL ISSUES AND THEY SEEM TO BE CENTERING ON THE ISSUE SURROUNDING TRANSGENDER
- 43:23LANGUAGE.
- 43:24BUT I DON'T THINK WE'RE TALKING PAST EACH OTHER AT ALL IN A FUNDAMENTAL SENSE.
- 43:27I MEAN, I THINK THAT THE REAL PROBLEM HERE IS THAT THERE'S A CONCERTED ATTEMPT MADE -- BEING
- 43:33MADE BY MANY PEOPLE TO SUBVERT ALL VALUES TO THE VALUE OF EQUALITY OF OUTCOME.
- 43:40WE NEED MORE THAN ONE VALUE, FIRST OF ALL, IF WE'RE GOING TO SURVIVE AS A SOCIETY, BECAUSE
- 43:45YOU CAN'T SOLVE EVERY PROBLEM WITH THE SAME APPROACH.
- 43:48BUT THERE ARE MORE INSIDIOUS THINGS, IN MY ESTIMATION, GOING ON UNDERNEATH.
- 43:54EVEN THE MISSSIVE THAT YOU JUST READ SAID THAT -- WELL, EVEN PROVIDING ME WITH A PLATFORM,
- 43:59LET'S CALL IT, TO EXPRESS MY VIEWS, IS SOMETHING THAT SHOULDN'T BE ALLOWED.
- 44:02IT'S LIKE, YES, THAT'S WHY I MADE THE VIDEO, IS BECAUSE MANY PEOPLE ARE CLAIMING THAT THE
- 44:07EXPRESSION OF THESE SORTS OF VIEWS SHOULD NO LONGER BE PERMITTED AND IT'S THIS VIEW FOR
- 44:13NOW, BUT THIS IS A MINOR ISSUE IN SOME WAYS COMPARED TO THE LARGER ISSUE THAT'S AT STAKE,
- 44:19WHICH IS THERE ARE RIGHTS TO HAVE THIS SORT OF DISCUSSION -- I MEAN, ONE THING THAT HAPPENED
- 44:23JUST WHEN WE STARTED THIS, THERE WAS AN INITIAL CLAIM THAT THERE'S NO SUCH THING AS
- 44:28BIOLOGICAL SEX.
- 44:29I BELIEVE QUITE FIRMLY THAT IF WE CONTINUE ON OUR PRESENT PATH AT THE UNIVERSITIES FOR FIVE
- 44:33MORE YEARS, THAT'S A DISCUSSION WE WILL NOT ACTUALLY BE ABLE TO HAVE ON CAMPUSES.
- 44:36>> Steve: BECAUSE IT'LL BE ...
- 44:39>> Jordan Peterson: BY FIAT.
- 44:41THE LEGISLATION ALREADY IMPLICITLY PRESUMES THAT BIOLOGICAL SEX, GENDER IDENTITY
- 44:46AND GENDER EXPRESSION, WHICH WE HAVEN'T EVEN TALKED ABOUT YET, VARY RIPPED PENALTY.
- 44:52THAT IS
- 44:57>> Steve: SOME THINK WE'RE
- 45:01I WONDER IF YOU COULD GIVE YOUR EXPLANATION AS TO WHY SOME PEOPLE ADAMANTLY REFUSE EVEN TO
- 45:06HAVE THIS DISCUSSION, THAT THE NOTION OF HAVING THIS DISCUSSION IS SOMEHOW TRANSPHOBIC?
- 45:15>> Theryn Meyer: I THINK IT HAS TO DO WITH -- THERE'S A LACKING WHEN IT COMES TO
- 45:19ACTUALLY BEING ABLE TO DEFEND YOUR POINTS THROUGH ARGUMENT.
- 45:26SO IF YOU OFFER UP A DISCUSSION FOR ARGUMENT, THEY KNOW THEY WILL LOSE.
- 45:32I THINK IT'S ABSOLUTELY LUDICROUS AND INSANE TO SAY THAT HAVING THIS DISCUSSION IS BY
- 45:38DEFAULT TRANSPHOBIC.
- 45:40I THINK IT'S EQUALLY LUDICROUS TO CALL DR. PETERSON BY WHAT HE SAID TRANSPHOBIC.
- 45:49I THINK USING THAT TERM SO WILLY-NILLY IT TAKES THE REMOTIONAL RESPONSE AND CONNOTES
- 45:59IN MY OPINION AS HAVING AN OPEN DISCUSSIONS AND I THINK THAT'S INSIDIOUS AND MANIPULATIVE.
- 46:05>> Steve: KYLE, ARE WE BEING TRANSPHOBIC BY HAVING THIS DEBATE?
- 46:11>> Kyle Kirkup: I DO WORRY ABOUT SETTING UP A FALSE EQUIVALENCY IN THIS CONVERSATION
- 46:18AND THAT TRANS LIVESES AREN'T UP FOR DEBATE.
- 46:23I'VE BEEN TROUBLED BY THE MISINFORMATION ABOUT WHAT THE LAW IS ACTUALLY GOING TO DO.
- 46:26I GRAPPLED WITH WHETHER OR NOT I WANTED TO PART PATE IN THIS DISCUSSION -- PARTICIPATE IN
- 46:33THIS DISCUSSION, BUT I THOUGHT IT WAS IMPORTANT TO DIAL BACK THE HATEFUL RHETORIC AND DO A
- 46:38CAREFUL DISCUSSION ABOUT WHAT THE LAW IS DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE AND ULTIMATELY TO PROMOTE A MORE
- 46:43EQUITABLE AND JUST SOCIETY.
- 46:45WE'VE TALKED ABOUT FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION, TO USE THE CANADIAN TERM.
- 46:48WE SHOULD ALSO BE TALKING ABOUT OTHER VALUES LIKE EQUALITY AND ANTI-RACISM, I THINK.
- 46:53>> Steve: JUST CURIOUS, MARY, I'M GOING TO GET TO YOU IN ONE SEC.
- 46:57YOU'VE PARTICIPATED IN 90 PERCENT OF THE PROGRAM, WE'RE JUST ABOUT DONE.
- 47:01WAS IT A GOOD IDEA FOR YOU TO COME ON?
- 47:05>> Kyle Kirkup: I THINK IT'S AN OPPORTUNITY TO TRY TO WORK THROUGH SOME OF THE LEGAL
- 47:08ISSUES, THE SOCIAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS AND EQUALITY ISSUES, AND SO I'M HAPPY TO BE HERE BUT I
- 47:14RECOGNIZE THAT OTHER PEOPLE'S EXPERIENCES, THEY MIGHT FIND ULTIMATELY THAT PARTICIPATING IN
- 47:19THIS PROGRAM WAS A MISTAKE.
- 47:21>> Steve: MARY, IF YOU WOULD FOLLOW UP?
- 47:24>> Mary Rogan: I CERTAINLY WANT TO SAY I FOUND, KYLE, THAT WHAT YOU BROUGHT TO IT IN TERMS
- 47:27OF PUTTING THE BILL INTO PERSPECTIVE ACTUALLY REALLY HELPFUL AND PROBABLY HELPFUL TO
- 47:32A LOT OF PEOPLE, SO I'M GLAD KYLE WAS HERE.
- 47:36FOR ME ONE OF THE THINGS I FELT ANXIOUS ABOUT COMING IN AND I'M PUZZLING OVER, WHY THIS ISSUE?
- 47:42WHY THIS ISSUE?
- 47:44AND I DO THINK, AT THE RISK OF BRINGING IN THE UNITED STATES AGAIN, THERE DOES SEEM TO BE A
- 47:50SIMILARITY BETWEEN SOME OF THE RHETORIC WE'RE HEARING DOWN SOUTH RIGHT NOW TO THE ELECTION
- 47:55AND THIS.
- 47:56IT FEELS LIKE IT'S GREATLY EXAGGERATED, SORT OF WHAT WILL FALL OUT FROM THIS, WHAT WILL --
- 48:02AND WE'RE SORT OF -- IT FEELS LIKE A BIT OF A TEMPEST IN A TEAPOT.
- 48:08I DON'T SEE THE CONNECTIONS JORDAN IS MAKING.
- 48:10AND AS A PERSON WHO IDENTIFIES AS TRANSGENDER, IT'S VERY, VERY CONFUSING THAT THIS IS SOMEHOW
- 48:15UP FOR DISCUSSION.
- 48:16>> Steve: YOU SAW THE TAPE AT THE BEGINNING OF THE PROGRAM OF THE -- I MEAN, HE TRIED TO GIVE
- 48:20A SPEECH AT A UNIVERSITY CAMPUS AND WAS REALLY QUITE MERCILESSLY SHOUTED DOWN.
- 48:26>> Mary Rogan: AND THAT WOULD BE ONE OF THE PLACES WHERE JORDAN AND I WOULD HAVE SOME
- 48:30COMMON GROUND IN THAT THERE HAS BEEN A TREND IN SOME WAYS FOR PEOPLE TO ALLOW NO PLATFORMING
- 48:39AND THIS PERSON'S VIEWS OR OBJECTIONABLE AND WE DON'T WANT THEM TO COME ON THE CAMPUS.
- 48:43>> Steve: WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THAT?
- 48:45>> Mary Rogan: I THINK IT'S BEST NOT DISCUSSED IN THE CONTEXT OF SOMEONE'S PERSONAL
- 48:49IDENTITY.
- 48:49THAT'S PART OF WHAT I'M BOTHERED BY BY THIS DISCUSSION.
- 48:52>> Steve: IF YOU CAN'T HAVE A DISCUSSION ABOUT FREE SPEECH ON A UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, THEN I
- 48:56GUESS YOU CAN'T HAVE ONE, BECAUSE THAT'S SUPPOSED TO BE WHERE THEY HAPPEN, ISN'T IT?
- 49:00>> Mary Rogan: I AGREE WITH YOU.
- 49:02I THINK THAT THAT IS A PROBLEM.
- 49:03WHAT I'M TRYING TO SAY IS THOSE ISSUES CAME UP AROUND ISSUES OF SOMEONE WHO WAS PRO-ISRAEL WHO
- 49:09WANTED TO COME ONTO A CAMPUS.
- 49:11THOSE THINGS ARE POLITICAL.
- 49:12MY IDENTITY, MY PERSONAL IDENTITY, MY GENDER IDENTITY IS VERY SEPARATE FROM MY POLITICAL
- 49:17IDENTITY, SO IT'S VERY STRANGE TO HAVE THIS TO BE WHERE WE'RE GOING TO PLANT THE FLAG AND SAY
- 49:22ENOUGH WITH THIS CRAZY POLITICAL CORRECTNESS.
- 49:24YOU DON'T GET TO CHOOSE YOUR PRONOUN.
- 49:27IT SEEMS TRIVIAL TO ME.
- 49:28>> Jordan Peterson: I THOUGHT IT WAS AN AXIOM OF FEMINISM, FOR EXAMPLE, THAT THE PERSONAL IS
- 49:33POLITICAL.
- 49:34THAT'S A FAMOUS PHRASE, THE PERSONAL IS POLITICAL.
- 49:37>> Nicholas Matte: THE PERSONAL IS POLITICAL WHEN SOMEONE IS ATTACKING YOU ON A
- 49:40BASIS THAT IS PERSONAL AND THAT YOU CAN'T CHANGE ABOUT YOURSELF.
- 49:43THAT IS POLITICAL.
- 49:45AND THAT'S WHEN PEOPLE SOMETIMES BECOME POLITICIZED IS WHEN THEY REALIZE THAT NO MATTER WHAT THEY
- 49:50DO IN THE WORLD, THERE WILL BE PEOPLE WHO WILL CONTINUE TO ATTACK THEM ON RACIST GROUNDS,
- 49:55ON GENDER AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE GROUNDS, AND THAT'S WHY PEOPLE START TO FIGHT BACK AND THAT'S
- 50:00WHY PEOPLE OBJECT.
- 50:01>> Jordan Peterson: AND YOUR ATTEMPTS TO REGULATE MY LANGUAGE USE --
- 50:05>> Nicholas Matte: I DON'T CARE ABOUT YOUR LANGUAGE USE.
- 50:07I CARE ABOUT THE SAFETY OF THE PEOPLE WHO ARE BEING HARMED.
- 50:09>> Jordan Peterson: I KNOW.
- 50:10PEOPLE WHO MAKE YOUR KINDS OF ARGUMENTS ARE ALWAYS CONCERNED WITH OTHER PEOPLE'S SAFETY.
- 50:15>> Nicholas Matte: I'M CONCERNED WITH MY OWN SAFETY.
- 50:17JUST SO PEOPLE ARE AWARE, MY PHYSICAL, EMOTIONAL LIFE AND LIVELIHOOD IS AT RISK FROM BEING
- 50:24HERE AND THAT'S NOT TRUE FOR EVERYONE.
- 50:27I DON'T KNOW ABOUT YOURS.
- 50:27>> Jordan Peterson: YOU KNOW PERFECTLY WELL -- >> Nicholas Matte: THAT'S ONE
- 50:30OF THE MAJOR WAYS THAT YOU'RE ABLE TO DO THIS.
- 50:32BUT I JUST WANT PEOPLE TO BE AWARE THAT TRANS AND GENDER DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND
- 50:38ESPECIALLY PEOPLE OF COLOUR ARE BEING TARGETED AND THREATENED PHYSICALLY.
- 50:43SO FREE SPEECH IS A GREAT IDEA AND EQUALITY IS A GREAT IDEA, BUT WE ACTUALLY CAN'T HAVE THOSE
- 50:48CONVERSATIONS WHEN PEOPLE ARE NOT EVEN ABLE TO BE PRESENT.
- 50:50>> Steve: JORDAN, LET ME READ THIS TWEET TO YOU AND I'LL GET YOU TO RESPOND TO IT BECAUSE
- 50:55IT'S INSTRUCTIVE OF THE CONVERSATION THAT JUST TOOK PLACE BETWEEN THE TWO OF YOU.
- 51:03>> Steve: DO YOU AGREE THERE'S A DIFFERENCE?
- 51:05>> Jordan Peterson: CERTAINLY THERE'S A DIFFERENCE.
- 51:06>> Steve: ARE YOU PREPARED TO SUFFER THE CONSEQUENCES THAT SOCIETY
- 51:12MAY DEEM YOU NEED TO SUFFER BECAUSE OF YOUR VIEWS?
- 51:13>> Jordan Peterson: YES, I'M PREPARED TO DO THAT.
- 51:14>> Steve: WHAT DOES THAT ENTAIL?
- 51:15>> ARE YOU OPEN TO LEARNING?
- 51:17>> Jordan Peterson: THAT'S NOT THE QUESTION.
- 51:18>> Steve: HANG ON, THAT WASN'T THE QUESTION, THAT'S RIGHT.
- 51:20>> Jordan Peterson: SO WHAT AM I WILLING TO DO?
- 51:22WELL, I THINK THAT THE ONTARIO HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL IS PROBABLY OBLIGATED BY THEIR OWN
- 51:27TANGLED WEB TO BRING ME IN FRONT OF IT.
- 51:30IF IT THEY FINE ME, I WON'T PAY IT.
- 51:31IF THEY PUT ME IN JAIL, I'LL GO ON A HUNGER STRIKE.
- 51:34I'M NOT DOING THIS.
- 51:36THAT'S THAT.
- 51:37I'M NOT USING WORDS THAT OTHER PEOPLE REQUIRE ME TO USE, ESPECIALLY IF THEY'RE MADE UP BY
- 51:43RADICAL LEFT-WING IDEOLOGUES.
- 51:46NOW, IF OUR SOCIETY COMES TO SOME SORT OF CONSENSUS OVER THE NEXT WHILE ABOUT HOW WE'LL SOLVE
- 51:52THE PRONOUN PROBLEM, LET'S CALL IT, AND THAT BECOMES PART OF POPULAR PARLANCE AND IT SEEMS TO
- 51:57SOLVE THE PROBLEM PROPERLY WITHOUT SACRIFICING THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN SINGULAR AND
- 52:01PLURAL AND WITHOUT REQUIRING ME TO MEMORIZE AN IMPOSSIBLE LIST OF AN INDEFINITE NUMBER OF
- 52:06PRONOUNS, THEN I WOULD BE WILLING TO RECONSIDER MY POSITION.
- 52:09BUT I'M ALSO PARTLY OPPOSED TO THIS BECAUSE IT'S BEEN MADE MANDATORY AND HAS THE WHOLE
- 52:15WEIGHT OF THE LAW BEHIND IT.
- 52:16IT'S LIKE THIS IS A VERY BAD IDEA.
- 52:18I BELIEVE THIS IS A VERY BAD IDEA.
- 52:20AND I BELIEVE THAT THE REASON THIS HAS CAUSED SO MUCH NOISE, A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF NOISE,
- 52:25TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF ATTENTION ON YouTube, IS BECAUSE THERE ARE THINGS THAT ARE AT STAKE IN
- 52:28THIS DISCUSSION DESPITE ITS SURFACE NATURE THAT STRIKE AT THE VERY HEART OF OUR
- 52:34CIVILIZATION.
- 52:34THAT'S WHAT I BELIEVE.
- 52:35>> Steve: DO YOU HAVE TENURE?
- 52:36>> Jordan Peterson: I DO.
- 52:37>> Steve: SO THEY CAN'T FIRE YOU FOR THIS?
- 52:40>> Jordan Peterson: WELL, IT'S NOT ALL THAT EASY TO FIGURE OUT WHAT PEOPLE CAN AND CAN'T DO.
- 52:45CERTAINLY THEY COULD FIRE ME IF I WAS, LET'S SAY -- IF THE HATE SPEECH ALLEGATION, SO TO SPEAK,
- 52:53STUCK.
- 52:53I MEAN, THE UNIVERSITY -- LOOK.
- 52:55THE UNIVERSITY'S BEING QUITE REASONABLE ABOUT THIS, ESPECIALLY COMPARED TO MANY
- 52:59UNIVERSITIES.
- 53:00>> Steve: I'VE GOT TO SAY, WE HAVE A MINUTE LEFT AND I WANT TO GIVE IT TO JORDAN BECAUSE THE
- 53:04UNIVERSITY HAS NOT SAID ENTIRELY, SHUT UP, WE DON'T WANT TO HEAR THIS ANYMORE.
- 53:07>> Jordan Peterson: BUT I WENT AND TALKED TO THE DEAN ON FRIDAY AND I SAT DOWN WITH MY FAMILY
- 53:11AND I THOUGHT, OKAY, WHAT WOULD BE THE BEST WAY FOR THIS TO GO FOR EVERYONE, FOR ME AND FOR MY
- 53:16STUDENTS AND FOR THE UNIVERSITY AND FOR SOCIETY?
- 53:18I THOUGHT, OKAY, OBVIOUSLY THERE'S AN ISSUE HERE, SEVERAL OF THEM, BECAUSE OTHERWISE ALL
- 53:22OF THIS NOISE WOULDN'T HAVE EMERGED.
- 53:24SO WE SHOULD ACTUALLY HAVE A DEBATE ABOUT IT.
- 53:26>> Steve: AND THAT'S HAPPENING.
- 53:27>> Jordan Peterson: YES.
- 53:28I WENT AND TALKED TO THE DEAN, DAVID CAMERON, WHO IS A VERY REASONABLE PERSON, AND I SAID,
- 53:32LOOK, I THINK THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO SHOULD TAKE A LEADERSHIP POSITION ON THIS AND THERE'S
- 53:37ISSUES TO BE DISCUSSED HERE.
- 53:38>> Steve: WHO ARE YOU DEBATING?
- 53:39>> Jordan Peterson: HA.
- 53:40WELL, THAT REMAINS TO BE SEEN.
- 53:43I HAVEN'T SEEN PEOPLE FLOODING OUT OF THE WOODWORK TO DEBATE ME.
- 53:46>> Steve: DO WE HAVE A DATE, PLACE, AND TIME YET?
- 53:48>> Jordan Peterson: WE DON'T.
- 53:50IT WILL PROBABLY BE ON CAMPUS IN A MORNING IN THE NEXT FEW WEEKS.
- 53:53>> Steve: LET ME KNOW, WE WILL TWEET IT OUT THERE.
- 53:57THAT'S OUR TIME.
- 53:58I DO WANT TO THANK EVERYBODY FOR COMING IN.
- 54:01WE HOPE IT WAS WORTH YOUR WHILE.
- 54:04WE FOUND IT A VERY USEFUL EXERCISE.
- 54:07>> Nicholas Matte: PEOPLE WHO WATCHED THIS PROGRAM MAY BE IN NEED --
- 54:10>> Steve: DO YOU HAVE A WEBSITE?
- 54:13>> Nicholas Matte: I WOULD ENCOURAGE PEOPLE GOING TO TRANSFORMING.CA.
- 54:18IT WILL APPEAL TO ANYONE WITH AN INTEREST IN LEARNING.
- 54:26TRANSFORMINGJUSTICE.CA.
- 54:26>> Steve: THERYN MEYER IN VANCOUVER, PROFESSOR KIRKUP AT THE UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA.
- 54:30WE THANK YOU FOR BEING OUTSIDE OUR STUDIO BUT PART OF OUR BROADCAST TONIGHT.
- 54:35JORDAN PETERSON OF THE U OF T, NICHOLAS MATTE FROM THE U OF T, MARY ROGAN, HER PIECE IN THE
- 54:38WALRUS MAGAZINE ON BETTER BOOK STORES AND CORNER STORES STANDS EVERYWHERE.
- 54:44THANKS VERY MUCH, EVERYBODY.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of Does Canada’s Bill C-16 Violate Free Speech or Protect Human Rights? | The Agenda by TVO Today, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 9,291 words across 835 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to choose a caption track available on the video.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, caption language selection, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.