Do We Need the Department of Education? | 5-Minute Videos | PragerU — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:02Do we need a department of education?
- 0:04There's a good reason to ask this
- 0:06question. Before 1979, the American
- 0:09public education system, which was
- 0:11almost entirely managed by state and
- 0:13local governments, was widely
- 0:15acknowledged as the best in the world.
- 0:18Almost half a century later, no one can
- 0:21make that claim. Right now, the United
- 0:23States is ranked 28th in the world in
- 0:26math and 36th in literacy.
- 0:30One in four eighth graders lacks a basic
- 0:32proficiency in math. One in three are
- 0:35not reading at grade level. Only 13% are
- 0:38proficient in US history. In certain
- 0:41cities, the numbers are truly appalling.
- 0:44For example, in Chicago, 22 schools
- 0:47didn't have a single student who was
- 0:50proficient in reading comprehension, and
- 0:5233 schools didn't have a single student
- 0:55who was proficient in math. It's not a
- 0:58money problem. According to the most
- 1:00recent numbers, the United States spends
- 1:03$17,000 per student. In Chicago, it's
- 1:0729,000. So, what changed? How did our
- 1:10education system go from outstanding to
- 1:13embarrassing? There are many reasons, of
- 1:15course, from too much screen time to not
- 1:17enough engaged parents. But we can be
- 1:19confident in one conclusion. The
- 1:21Department of Education hasn't helped.
- 1:24And the case can be made that it has
- 1:26actually made things worse. Again, it
- 1:29wasn't for lack of money. In 2024, the
- 1:32department's budget was
- 1:34268 billion. Where's all that money
- 1:36going and for what? To answer that
- 1:39question, we need to go back to
- 1:421979. The president that year was Jimmy
- 1:44Carter. The 1980 election was closing
- 1:47fast, and Carter's chances were not
- 1:50looking good. Beset by the Iran hostage
- 1:52crisis, crippling inflation, and
- 1:54gasoline shortages, Carter's approval
- 1:57ratings had plummeted to a dismal 28%.
- 2:01He needed all the friends he could get,
- 2:03and there was no better friend than the
- 2:05largest labor union in the country, the
- 2:08National Education Association. It had
- 2:11been agitating for a department of
- 2:12education for decades without success.
- 2:15No one besides the teachers unions
- 2:17thought it was necessary. But politics
- 2:20is politics. So Carter gave the union
- 2:23what it wanted. A brand new government
- 2:25department and all the perks that go
- 2:27with it. A big budget, a big stick with
- 2:30which to threaten local schools. Adopt
- 2:32this program or you won't get federal
- 2:34dollars, and a big bureaucracy which
- 2:36they could fill with their loyalists.
- 2:39One anonymous House Democrat admitted as
- 2:42much at the time. The idea of an
- 2:44education department is a really bad
- 2:47one, but it's NEA's top priority. There
- 2:50are school teachers in every
- 2:51congressional district, and most of us
- 2:54simply don't need the aggravation of
- 2:56taking them on. Bad idea or not, what
- 2:59was good for the education of American
- 3:01children took a backseat to Carter's
- 3:03election prospects. In 1979, he signed
- 3:07the Department into law. From its
- 3:09inception, the Department of Education
- 3:12was a political institution. It was
- 3:14never intended to help students. It was
- 3:16intended to help the Democratic Party
- 3:19and the unions. And in that assignment,
- 3:22it gets an A+. Its employees, almost all
- 3:26Democrats, make a very good living. And
- 3:28a big chunk of them, over
- 3:302500, are doing great, making well over
- 3:34$100,000 a year. The department
- 3:36dispenses about 80 billion to schools
- 3:39across the country for educationally
- 3:41questionable initiatives like teacher
- 3:43development, diversity training,
- 3:46critical theory studies, and climate
- 3:49change awareness. But most of the money
- 3:51goes to hiring more school
- 3:53administrators, counselors, and their
- 3:55assistants. Reading, writing, and math.
- 3:58The basics are not, it would seem, a
- 4:00high priority. The unions get the jobs
- 4:03and the goodies. The Democrats get the
- 4:06votes. The NEA has endorsed every
- 4:09Democratic presidential nominee since
- 4:11Carter and a vehicle to push their ideas
- 4:14on America's youth. These ideas have
- 4:16become more bizarre with each passing
- 4:19year. Here's one recent example out of
- 4:22dozens I could site. Under the Biden
- 4:24administration, the department gave
- 4:27Framingham State University $1.3 million
- 4:31to write a textbook. That's $1.3 million
- 4:34for one book for high school students
- 4:37that provides a lens for understanding
- 4:40the evolving definition of family
- 4:43through socially constructed and
- 4:45ecological theory frameworks, whatever
- 4:48that means. Name something radical
- 4:50happening in our schools like boys
- 4:52competing against girls in sports and
- 4:54the department of education has been
- 4:56behind it. So, do we need a department
- 4:59of education? The answer would seem to
- 5:02be needed for what? If it's just to
- 5:05distribute money, why do we need another
- 5:08giant bureaucracy to do it? Why not give
- 5:10the money directly to the states from
- 5:12the Treasury Department? If the
- 5:14alternative is let's not close the
- 5:17department altogether, let's reform it.
- 5:19How do you reform something into
- 5:21something it was never intended to be?
- 5:24But if the department really exists as a
- 5:27slush fund for the teachers unions and
- 5:29the educational elite and as a
- 5:31laboratory for social experimentation on
- 5:34our kids, then there's only one viable
- 5:37solution. Shut it down. I'm Marissa
- 5:40Stright for Prager University. Thank you
- 5:42for watching this video. To keep PragerU
- 5:44videos free, please consider making a
- 5:46taxdeductible donation.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of Do We Need the Department of Education? | 5-Minute Videos | PragerU by PragerU, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 842 words across 135 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to choose a caption track available on the video.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, caption language selection, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.