YouTube2Text

Did Affirmative Action Work? | 5-Minute Videos | PragerU — Transcript

by PragerU · 854 words · 144 segments · language en · Watch on YouTube

Full transcript

  1. 0:00Before
  2. 0:02Harvard law professor Derek Bell was for
  3. 0:04affirmative action, he was against it.
  4. 0:06This is noteworthy because Bell is best
  5. 0:08known for his contributions to critical
  6. 0:10race theory, which claims that racism is
  7. 0:12embedded in American institutions and
  8. 0:14that the historical mistreatment of
  9. 0:16black people largely explains current
  10. 0:18disparities. In a 1970 Law Review
  11. 0:21article, Belell objected to using
  12. 0:23different criteria to assess student
  13. 0:25performance depending on race. In the
  14. 0:27past, he noted, the small percentages of
  15. 0:29blacks admitted to selective law schools
  16. 0:31not only met the usual academic
  17. 0:33criteria, but were often characterized
  18. 0:35by a strong inner drive to equal and, if
  19. 0:38at all possible, excel their white
  20. 0:40classmates. Admitting blacks who did not
  21. 0:42meet accepted standards was, in Bell's
  22. 0:44words, a form of benevolent paternalism.
  23. 0:47He warned that racial preferences risked
  24. 0:49tainting the accomplishments of those
  25. 0:51who succeeded in the eyes of whites and
  26. 0:54blacks alike. Whatever arguments are
  27. 0:56used to justify such a policy, he wrote,
  28. 0:59there is little denying that it robs
  29. 1:00those black students who have done well
  30. 1:02of receiving real credit and the boost
  31. 1:05in confidence that their accomplishments
  32. 1:06merit. Although Bell later changed his
  33. 1:09mind, he offered a preview of a half
  34. 1:12ccentury of arguments that would be made
  35. 1:14against racial preferences that might
  36. 1:16give pause to those who are inclined to
  37. 1:18dismiss criticism of affirmative action
  38. 1:20as racist.
  39. 1:22Bell's concerns about the psychological
  40. 1:24toll of affirmative action turned out to
  41. 1:26be preient. More than five decades of
  42. 1:28racial preferences have created the
  43. 1:30impression that black advancement is
  44. 1:32impossible without them. Justice Sonia
  45. 1:35Sotomayor wrote in her descent of the
  46. 1:382023 Supreme Court ruling against
  47. 1:40affirmative action, students for fair
  48. 1:42admissions v. Harvard, that the court's
  49. 1:44ruling rolls back decades of precedent
  50. 1:47and momentous progress. Justice Katanji
  51. 1:50Brown Jackson said the majority had
  52. 1:52detached itself from this country's
  53. 1:55actual past and present experiences.
  54. 1:58This doomsay assumes racial favoritism
  55. 2:00is a prerequisite for black
  56. 2:02accomplishment. Because it has been
  57. 2:04asserted for decades that affirmative
  58. 2:06action and government programs produce
  59. 2:08today's black middle class, few bother
  60. 2:10to question the claim. But when we do, a
  61. 2:13very different narrative emerges. During
  62. 2:16the first twothirds of the 20th century,
  63. 2:19long before affirmative action and an
  64. 2:21expanded welfare state, black Americans
  65. 2:24experienced remarkable progress.
  66. 2:26Education gaps narrowed, incomes rose,
  67. 2:29poverty declined. This history is often
  68. 2:31ignored because activists and
  69. 2:33politicians prefer a narrative of
  70. 2:35suffering. Yet, it should be a source of
  71. 2:37pride for blacks and inspiration for
  72. 2:40other minorities. In 1940, 25 to 29y old
  73. 2:44whites had 3.6 years more of schooling
  74. 2:48on average than blacks. By 1960, both
  75. 2:51groups had advanced, but blacks outpaced
  76. 2:54whites, and the gap had narrowed by more
  77. 2:56than half to 1.7 years. Between 1940 and
  78. 3:001960, the percentage of blacks with a
  79. 3:03high school diploma more than tripled,
  80. 3:04again, growing faster than whites. But
  81. 3:07as colleges began compromising admission
  82. 3:09standards in the late 1960s, these
  83. 3:12trends slowed. According to Harvard
  84. 3:14political scientist Robert Putnham and
  85. 3:16co-author Shayen Garrett, the fastest
  86. 3:19and most dramatic progress toward parody
  87. 3:20in education between blacks and whites
  88. 3:23finishing high school was achieved
  89. 3:24before 1970.
  90. 3:27The same story can be told about income.
  91. 3:29More education meant better jobs and
  92. 3:31higher pay. And just as educational
  93. 3:34gains among blacks were speedier before
  94. 3:35affirmative action, so too were wage
  95. 3:38gains. Yet, affirmative action policies
  96. 3:40were given far more credit than they
  97. 3:42deserved. Mainly because proponents
  98. 3:44started the story in the middle. In
  99. 3:461939, the annual median income was $350
  100. 3:51for black males and $1,000 for white
  101. 3:53males. By 1960, those figures had
  102. 3:56reached 3,000 and $5,000, respectively.
  103. 4:00An increase of 570% for blacks and 360%
  104. 4:05for whites. All of this occurred before
  105. 4:07affirmative action and the civil rights
  106. 4:10legislation of the mid 1960s. Between
  107. 4:121940 and 1970, the median annual income
  108. 4:16for black men rose from 40% to 60% of
  109. 4:19the white male median, a 20 point gain.
  110. 4:22Under the first 25 years of affirmative
  111. 4:24action, 1970 to 1995, it grew only seven
  112. 4:28more points to 67%.
  113. 4:31Among black women, the pre-affirmative
  114. 4:33action gains were even more striking.
  115. 4:35Median earnings climbed from 36% of the
  116. 4:38white female median in 1940 to 73% by
  117. 4:421970, a 37 point gain. Between 1970 and
  118. 4:471995, however, black female pay rose by
  119. 4:50just 16 more points. Black earnings were
  120. 4:53clearly rising faster before affirmative
  121. 4:56action. Central to the social justice
  122. 4:59ideology behind affirmative action is
  123. 5:01the belief that disparities mainly
  124. 5:03result from discrimination, not from
  125. 5:05differences in skills, behavior, or
  126. 5:07culture. Accordingly, black advancement
  127. 5:10is said to depend on policies that
  128. 5:12counter antilack bias with anti-white
  129. 5:14bias. Yet the phenomenal rise of blacks
  130. 5:17in the first twothirds of the 20th
  131. 5:18century, despite centuries of
  132. 5:20mistreatment, strongly rebuke such
  133. 5:23claims. History shows that black people
  134. 5:26made greater strides under colorblind
  135. 5:28policies than under affirmative action.
  136. 5:31Derek Bell had it right the first time.
  137. 5:33I'm Jason Riley, senior fellow at the
  138. 5:35Manhattan Institute and author of the
  139. 5:37affirmative action myth: Why blacks
  140. 5:39don't need racial preferences to succeed
  141. 5:41for Prager University. Thank you for
  142. 5:44watching this video. To keep PragerU
  143. 5:46videos free, please consider making a
  144. 5:48taxdeductible donation.

About this transcript

This page contains the full transcript of Did Affirmative Action Work? | 5-Minute Videos | PragerU by PragerU, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 854 words across 144 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.

What you can do with it

Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.

Free YouTube transcript tool

YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.