Did Affirmative Action Work? | 5-Minute Videos | PragerU — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00Before
- 0:02Harvard law professor Derek Bell was for
- 0:04affirmative action, he was against it.
- 0:06This is noteworthy because Bell is best
- 0:08known for his contributions to critical
- 0:10race theory, which claims that racism is
- 0:12embedded in American institutions and
- 0:14that the historical mistreatment of
- 0:16black people largely explains current
- 0:18disparities. In a 1970 Law Review
- 0:21article, Belell objected to using
- 0:23different criteria to assess student
- 0:25performance depending on race. In the
- 0:27past, he noted, the small percentages of
- 0:29blacks admitted to selective law schools
- 0:31not only met the usual academic
- 0:33criteria, but were often characterized
- 0:35by a strong inner drive to equal and, if
- 0:38at all possible, excel their white
- 0:40classmates. Admitting blacks who did not
- 0:42meet accepted standards was, in Bell's
- 0:44words, a form of benevolent paternalism.
- 0:47He warned that racial preferences risked
- 0:49tainting the accomplishments of those
- 0:51who succeeded in the eyes of whites and
- 0:54blacks alike. Whatever arguments are
- 0:56used to justify such a policy, he wrote,
- 0:59there is little denying that it robs
- 1:00those black students who have done well
- 1:02of receiving real credit and the boost
- 1:05in confidence that their accomplishments
- 1:06merit. Although Bell later changed his
- 1:09mind, he offered a preview of a half
- 1:12ccentury of arguments that would be made
- 1:14against racial preferences that might
- 1:16give pause to those who are inclined to
- 1:18dismiss criticism of affirmative action
- 1:20as racist.
- 1:22Bell's concerns about the psychological
- 1:24toll of affirmative action turned out to
- 1:26be preient. More than five decades of
- 1:28racial preferences have created the
- 1:30impression that black advancement is
- 1:32impossible without them. Justice Sonia
- 1:35Sotomayor wrote in her descent of the
- 1:382023 Supreme Court ruling against
- 1:40affirmative action, students for fair
- 1:42admissions v. Harvard, that the court's
- 1:44ruling rolls back decades of precedent
- 1:47and momentous progress. Justice Katanji
- 1:50Brown Jackson said the majority had
- 1:52detached itself from this country's
- 1:55actual past and present experiences.
- 1:58This doomsay assumes racial favoritism
- 2:00is a prerequisite for black
- 2:02accomplishment. Because it has been
- 2:04asserted for decades that affirmative
- 2:06action and government programs produce
- 2:08today's black middle class, few bother
- 2:10to question the claim. But when we do, a
- 2:13very different narrative emerges. During
- 2:16the first twothirds of the 20th century,
- 2:19long before affirmative action and an
- 2:21expanded welfare state, black Americans
- 2:24experienced remarkable progress.
- 2:26Education gaps narrowed, incomes rose,
- 2:29poverty declined. This history is often
- 2:31ignored because activists and
- 2:33politicians prefer a narrative of
- 2:35suffering. Yet, it should be a source of
- 2:37pride for blacks and inspiration for
- 2:40other minorities. In 1940, 25 to 29y old
- 2:44whites had 3.6 years more of schooling
- 2:48on average than blacks. By 1960, both
- 2:51groups had advanced, but blacks outpaced
- 2:54whites, and the gap had narrowed by more
- 2:56than half to 1.7 years. Between 1940 and
- 3:001960, the percentage of blacks with a
- 3:03high school diploma more than tripled,
- 3:04again, growing faster than whites. But
- 3:07as colleges began compromising admission
- 3:09standards in the late 1960s, these
- 3:12trends slowed. According to Harvard
- 3:14political scientist Robert Putnham and
- 3:16co-author Shayen Garrett, the fastest
- 3:19and most dramatic progress toward parody
- 3:20in education between blacks and whites
- 3:23finishing high school was achieved
- 3:24before 1970.
- 3:27The same story can be told about income.
- 3:29More education meant better jobs and
- 3:31higher pay. And just as educational
- 3:34gains among blacks were speedier before
- 3:35affirmative action, so too were wage
- 3:38gains. Yet, affirmative action policies
- 3:40were given far more credit than they
- 3:42deserved. Mainly because proponents
- 3:44started the story in the middle. In
- 3:461939, the annual median income was $350
- 3:51for black males and $1,000 for white
- 3:53males. By 1960, those figures had
- 3:56reached 3,000 and $5,000, respectively.
- 4:00An increase of 570% for blacks and 360%
- 4:05for whites. All of this occurred before
- 4:07affirmative action and the civil rights
- 4:10legislation of the mid 1960s. Between
- 4:121940 and 1970, the median annual income
- 4:16for black men rose from 40% to 60% of
- 4:19the white male median, a 20 point gain.
- 4:22Under the first 25 years of affirmative
- 4:24action, 1970 to 1995, it grew only seven
- 4:28more points to 67%.
- 4:31Among black women, the pre-affirmative
- 4:33action gains were even more striking.
- 4:35Median earnings climbed from 36% of the
- 4:38white female median in 1940 to 73% by
- 4:421970, a 37 point gain. Between 1970 and
- 4:471995, however, black female pay rose by
- 4:50just 16 more points. Black earnings were
- 4:53clearly rising faster before affirmative
- 4:56action. Central to the social justice
- 4:59ideology behind affirmative action is
- 5:01the belief that disparities mainly
- 5:03result from discrimination, not from
- 5:05differences in skills, behavior, or
- 5:07culture. Accordingly, black advancement
- 5:10is said to depend on policies that
- 5:12counter antilack bias with anti-white
- 5:14bias. Yet the phenomenal rise of blacks
- 5:17in the first twothirds of the 20th
- 5:18century, despite centuries of
- 5:20mistreatment, strongly rebuke such
- 5:23claims. History shows that black people
- 5:26made greater strides under colorblind
- 5:28policies than under affirmative action.
- 5:31Derek Bell had it right the first time.
- 5:33I'm Jason Riley, senior fellow at the
- 5:35Manhattan Institute and author of the
- 5:37affirmative action myth: Why blacks
- 5:39don't need racial preferences to succeed
- 5:41for Prager University. Thank you for
- 5:44watching this video. To keep PragerU
- 5:46videos free, please consider making a
- 5:48taxdeductible donation.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of Did Affirmative Action Work? | 5-Minute Videos | PragerU by PragerU, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 854 words across 144 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.