Demystifying Q&A with Matika Wilbur — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00(instrumental music)
- 0:07- I'm Matika Wilbur.
- 0:08I'm from the Snohomish and Tulalip tribes
- 0:11in Washington state.
- 0:13I'm a Photographer, a Filmmaker, a Writer,
- 0:16and the Creator and Director of "Project 562",
- 0:19which is an effort to photograph all of the tribes
- 0:21in the United States, over 500 sovereign nations.
- 0:29Project 562 is an effort to photograph all of the tribes
- 0:32in the United States,
- 0:34and it was started because we wanted to put together
- 0:38a year long worth of visual literacy curriculum
- 0:40while I was a teacher at the tribal school at my res,
- 0:42and there wasn't enough material
- 0:44to create a comprehensive collection.
- 0:46So that's the main reason why I started this project.
- 0:50This is my fifth consecutive project
- 0:53that is centered around identity.
- 1:01Here, I would say that
- 1:03its primary focus has been focused on identity
- 1:06and aiming to understand how do we describe,
- 1:10understand, teach a contemporary indigenous identity?
- 1:15And so we asked each of our participants
- 1:17what it means to be an Indian,
- 1:19it was problematic,
- 1:21and so of course we had to change our questions
- 1:24because we know that we can't be Indians,
- 1:26we can't be something we never were.
- 1:28And you know the definition of an Indian is wrought with,
- 1:34well, not necessarily the definition,
- 1:36but the identity of an Indian is wrought with
- 1:38assimilation and termination and relocation and genocide,
- 1:43and those experiences don't define our people
- 1:47and they certainly don't give us a future.
- 1:49And since extinction is a very real part
- 1:52of the narrative when people consider American Indians,
- 1:56we have to rearrange that thinking
- 1:59so that people have imagined indigenous people
- 2:02as a part of the present.
- 2:04And so ideally folks would have the opportunity
- 2:08to learn the indigenous history
- 2:10and what it means to be a steward of the place
- 2:13that they're occupying.
- 2:15And hopefully we can create relationships with one another
- 2:18through that process.
- 2:20But yeah, in my experience,
- 2:23"Project 562" first started by asking that question,
- 2:27and then of course I've realized that
- 2:29the better question is,
- 2:30what does it mean to be
- 2:35Tulilap or Snohomish or a Warm Springs?
- 2:40And then I started to get a more land-based
- 2:42and relationship-based identity answer
- 2:44where people would say,
- 2:44we're the people of the tall pine trees
- 2:46or the people of the blue-green water
- 2:47or the people of the four sacred mountains.
- 2:49And those answers were more related to
- 2:52the original agreements of the land.
- 2:54And then I started to realize that that identity is connect
- 2:57since we are land-based relationship-based people,
- 3:00and started exploring that idea,
- 3:03I realized that all over the country
- 3:04people were at the forefront
- 3:06of almost every major environmental protection movement
- 3:08in the United States.
- 3:09And so I started questioning what it means to be indigenous
- 3:13and be relocated or feel displaced,
- 3:16even though we haven't relocated at all
- 3:18because the face of mother earth
- 3:19has changed so dramatically around us.
- 3:21And so how do we maintain a land-based identity
- 3:23when in many occasions the land that we are from
- 3:27historically do no longer resembles our original identities
- 3:30or our original agreements?
- 3:38Well, I go back and forth with the way that
- 3:41I talk about this with young and up and coming journalists,
- 3:44in some ways I often, you'll often hear me tell
- 3:48that I think that representation of indigenous peoples
- 3:52without consultation and consent
- 3:56and a constant revisiting of that consent
- 4:01is sort of like representation done to us.
- 4:04And I think that the misrepresentation of indigenous people
- 4:07is primarily responsible for many of the misconceptions
- 4:10and therefore the Supreme court decisions
- 4:13and the policies that affect our people.
- 4:15And I think it's very dangerous when non-Indians report
- 4:19or tell indigenous stories.
- 4:21And I think it's dangerous because
- 4:24I think that there's subtle nuance to understand
- 4:30and without having a comprehensive education,
- 4:33indigenous education
- 4:34without taking American Indian studies 101, 102
- 4:38and becoming an indigenous scholar of sorts,
- 4:42I think that it's really easy
- 4:46to not fully understand the complexity
- 4:48of an indigenous story.
- 4:49And so I would encourage young students to collaborate,
- 4:52to truly find the spirit of collaboration,
- 4:54and to ask for permission from
- 4:57not just the one person that they're photographing
- 4:59but maybe tribal council or tribal elders,
- 5:02or to find a way to make sure that the people
- 5:07that they're representing are given individual agency
- 5:09over the stories that are told about those individuals.
- 5:18If you're going to go into communities of color,
- 5:22then first you have to define the methodology
- 5:24with the people, the stakeholders.
- 5:26And a community-based journalism is not a definition
- 5:30that comes from within an indigenous community.
- 5:32It's not an indigenous pedagogy,
- 5:34so it's lacking in its definition.
- 5:39So I that's why I asked you,
- 5:45I don't think that it's been clearly defined
- 5:47the best practices but
- 5:54we can take from
- 5:55what different industries are doing in these communities
- 5:57and take them from their models.
- 5:59Researchers, for instance, in academia,
- 6:03have been almost like completely banned
- 6:07from many of our reservations
- 6:12because of their unethical approach.
- 6:15So for instance, once and Havasupai,
- 6:19a university came to Havasupai and said,
- 6:21"we wanna study your blood,
- 6:23and we're gonna help you with this crisis
- 6:25that you have in your community,
- 6:26we're gonna help you with diabetes.
- 6:29"And so we want to study, take blood samples
- 6:32and see if we can help you."
- 6:34And the people said, "yeah, okay."
- 6:36And then of course,
- 6:37they took the blood samples and tested them
- 6:39and did genetic testing
- 6:41and studied the sequencing of their DNA
- 6:44and then turn it over to the federal government
- 6:46because the federal government wanted to prove
- 6:47that the 'Supai's weren't from that Canyon
- 6:49so that they could forcibly remove them from the Canyon
- 6:52because they wanted that to be simply reserved for
- 6:57a national park system.
- 7:00And they had to fight it in court for a very long time
- 7:03until they finally won.
- 7:05And then precedents had to be set for the ways that
- 7:08research is done in indigenous communities.
- 7:11So these IRBs have to be signed appropriately
- 7:18and tribal governments have had to create policies
- 7:21for allowing outsiders to come into our communities.
- 7:24And because it's been done so terribly
- 7:28over and over and over again,
- 7:29many times if a journalist calls one of our communities
- 7:33there's just like a blanket, no comment, don't come here.
- 7:36And so that's a problem
- 7:37because we need our stories told,
- 7:40but in order for us to be able to do that
- 7:42we have to create collaborative models.
- 7:45And agency has to be given back
- 7:47to the individual in the image
- 7:49and the decision makers of that community
- 7:52should play a role in that.
- 7:53And then, so it forces us to re-imagine our ideas of being
- 7:59unconsciously biased.
- 8:01I think it's a part of a post eighties generation
- 8:05or post seventies generation, post civil rights movement,
- 8:08where we think that we're past
- 8:09like capable of not seeing color,
- 8:12capable of moving beyond race and social
- 8:16and class boundaries,
- 8:17and now we think that we're post-racial
- 8:21and a society where we're clearly aren't.
- 8:23And so we have to acknowledge that
- 8:26we come into every circumstance with a very deep biasness.
- 8:31And it's through acknowledging
- 8:33that we shift our perspectives and we shift power,
- 8:36but we cannot, until we acknowledge
- 8:39that no that's capable, we're even capable of that.
- 8:43Your experience growing up wherever you grew up
- 8:47was entirely different than my experience
- 8:49and we are going to see things entirely differently.
- 8:52We can go to the exact same place,
- 8:54take the same image and have the exact same experience,
- 8:57and your commentary is going to be exactly as you are
- 9:03and it is going to be entirely different
- 9:05than the way that I see it.
- 9:08Even if we have the conversation
- 9:10over and over and over again
- 9:11about why we see it differently
- 9:12we are going to have a different experience.
- 9:14And so I think when the original four founders of
- 9:18people writing about the ethics of journalism
- 9:20were considering this,
- 9:22they were considering it from their own perspective.
- 9:26(closing instrumental music)
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of Demystifying Q&A with Matika Wilbur by UO SOJC, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 1,352 words across 193 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.