DEBATI COM LEO GRANDINI DO PT - Valendo PIX de R$ 200 — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00They are a much more evolved movement
- 0:02than all the others. They are better
- 0:04than the PT supporters, the Bolsonaro
- 0:06supporters, everyone. Thanks.
- 0:07>> Thanks. Thank you. Thank you, okay?
- 0:10Thank you. Thank you.
- 0:13>> You are a spoiled brat. Extremely
- 0:15spoiled. I'm I'm spoiled, a spoiled kid
- 0:17. That's it. Extremely spoiled. Because
- 0:20things have to be your way. That's my
- 0:22perception.
- 0:22>> In other words, if your perception
- 0:24isn't right,
- 0:25>> that's what being spoiled is, man.
- 0:29>> It's sexist.
- 0:30>> Look at the level of these people. Who
- 0:32have sexist remarks. Yeah, brother.
- 0:34>> So you think L is sexist?
- 0:40>> Oh honey, let's go. Honey, honey guys.
- 0:45No, but we know
- 0:46>> Leonardo is good at interrupting, he's
- 0:48not good at answering. Hey everyone,
- 0:50I'm back here on Avenida Paulista for
- 0:52the last change my mind of the year or
- 0:54the election. This time with a guy you
- 0:57know very well, Leonardo Grandini,
- 0:59candidate for deputy for the Workers '
- 1:01Party. Grandini, as you may have
- 1:03already seen on social media, we always
- 1:05stay here with the following challenge.
- 1:07A 200 BRL Pix to whoever convinces me
- 1:09to vote for Lula. Do you think I should
- 1:10vote for Lula? Let's go, Guto. Look,
- 1:13>> you're from his party, man.
- 1:15>> No, I'm from his party and in defense
- 1:17of workers' interests, of sovereignty,
- 1:20I think you should, but at the same
- 1:22time I also have an evaluation that is
- 1:24very particular. I think certain people
- 1:28shouldn't vote for President Lula. I
- 1:31believe the MBL is a movement of people
- 1:33with very complex characteristics
- 1:36regarding women, right? I don't exactly
- 1:40know why, I don't even know why your
- 1:43militancy, more than 90%, is made up of
- 1:46boys, of men. But I would also like to
- 1:50understand what your issue is with
- 1:52women, why you all have controversies
- 1:54involving women in relation to
- 1:56President Lula. We are in the
- 1:58government that was responsible for
- 1:59taking Brazil off the hunger and misery
- 2:01map. The government responsible for
- 2:03ending the 6x1 work schedule, which Mr.
- 2:05Flávio Bolsonaro, who I know you also
- 2:07don't support, went to Brasília to
- 2:09conspire against it being approved in
- 2:10the Senate together with Mr. Davi
- 2:12Alcolumbre. It's the government
- 2:14responsible for exempting 90%of the
- 2:16Brazilian people from paying income tax
- 2:17, those who earn up to 5,000 BRL. It's
- 2:20the government responsible for putting
- 2:23at least 600,000 people in public and
- 2:25private universities. Government
- 2:28responsible for creating the national
- 2:30registry of pedophiles. A responsible
- 2:33government that even sanctioned a bill
- 2:34from Quincatagui, so you can see that
- 2:36we don't care which party a good bill
- 2:38comes from if it increases penalties
- 2:40for certain crimes. So look, I think
- 2:43there are several factors, of course,
- 2:45there are several factors today that
- 2:47advocate in defense of President Lula's
- 2:49government.
- 2:49>> From what I saw on your social media,
- 2:51you're a lawyer, aren't you? Acquittal,
- 2:52but that's acquittal and filing.
- 2:54Different things. Grandini, I didn't
- 2:55interrupt you even once. Not once. Not
- 2:57once. It was exactly zero times.
- 2:59>> Go ahead. No, perfect.
- 3:00>> You mentioned a state registry for
- 3:03pedophiles.
- 3:05>> Do you think that in the state of São
- 3:06Paulo, which is the largest in the
- 3:07federation, we should have a state
- 3:08registry for pedophiles?
- 3:10>> I think, I think it's important. So
- 3:11much so that I advocate for children
- 3:12and women who are victims of violence.
- 3:13>> Do you know, do you know who filed this
- 3:14bill in the Legislative Assembly of the
- 3:16State of São Paulo? Do you know which
- 3:17was the only party that didn't have a
- 3:19single deputy who wanted to approve
- 3:21this bill? It's your party.
- 3:25>> You said that my party says several
- 3:27things against women. I defended
- 3:29>> that there are many men who have
- 3:30controversies with women.
- 3:31>> When Lula put Gleisi there, we know
- 3:35>> Leonardo is good at interrupting. He is
- 3:37not good at answering. I didn't
- 3:38interrupt you at any point. He's going
- 3:40to answer them all. Let's go. When Lula
- 3:42appointed Gleisi Hoffmann to the Chief
- 3:43of Staff's office, he said he would put
- 3:45a beautiful woman there to try to
- 3:46convince those men.
- 3:50>> All of us here, men and women,
- 3:52reproduce behaviors that are sometimes
- 3:54sexist. We are talking about a
- 3:55president.
- 3:56>> Do you think that phrase is sexist?
- 3:57>> 80 years old, who unfortunately has
- 3:59words and phrases that are sexist in
- 4:02nature.
- 4:03>> I want to know if the phrase is sexist
- 4:04or not. Look, look at the level, look
- 4:07at the level that has sexist remarks.
- 4:09Yes, brother. Confrontation.
- 4:12>> Oh, honey, let's go.
- 4:13>> I'm not your honey.
- 4:15>> Your crowd is your honey. Is Lula
- 4:16sexist or not?
- 4:17>> Everyone here reproduces sexist remarks
- 4:19all the time. Are you sexist or not?
- 4:22>> You have a project, you have a project,
- 4:25you have a project that simply aims to
- 4:27end all women's rights.
- 4:30>> End all women's rights.
- 4:31>> I have a series of programs against
- 4:33women.
- 4:34>> Is Lula sexist or not?
- 4:35>> No.
- 4:35>> You can say sexist phrases and not be a
- 4:37sexist. Not be structurally sexist.
- 4:39Most certainly.
- 4:40>> Structurally sexist. Most certainly.
- 4:42Structurally.
- 4:43>> So, Lula is a sexist.
- 4:46>> Do you really want to go down that road
- 4:47?
- 4:47>> I do, man, let's go.
- 4:49>> You're the one who brought up the
- 4:50sexism debate.
- 4:51>> I wanted—I want to debate the Lula
- 4:52administration. You went to sexism.
- 4:54>> Of course. Convenient. But look, I'm
- 4:56saying let's discuss the government. I
- 4:57think it's convenient.
- 4:58>> I think so. Which is why we're
- 4:59discussing it right here. We can
- 5:01discuss it; you brought up the MBL. Now
- 5:04,
- 5:04>> I asked about the MBL. You started
- 5:06talking
- 5:06>> now. I really—and this is a genuine
- 5:09question of mine, I'm not trying to
- 5:11make clickbait or anything—how does
- 5:12the movement manage to have so many
- 5:14issues with women like you do? A while
- 5:24ago, you called the MBL extremist, and
- 5:27recently a member of your party—I
- 5:29won't name names because I think it's
- 5:31irrelevant—a member of your party
- 5:34said the MBL was a fascist movement. I
- 5:37don't know if you consider the MBL a
- 5:38fascist movement or not.
- 5:39>> I think the MBL is a fascist movement.
- 5:41>> What resemblance does the Free Brazil
- 5:42Movement have to Mussolini's fascist
- 5:44regime? The MBL has lived to fight the
- 5:47PT since 2015; that's the MBL's goal,
- 5:49and Renan Santos himself thinks he's
- 5:51the one who brought Dilma down. Second
- 5:53point, there is a logic in the MBL
- 5:55today that isn't merely a liberal logic
- 5:58. So much so that Renan Santos, for
- 6:01example, defends the dictator of El
- 6:02Salvador, right, who isn't a liberal
- 6:04guy, he's a guy whose economy has a
- 6:06strong state presence. And Renan Santos
- 6:09himself has been criticizing the
- 6:11Brazilian elite, has criticized various
- 6:12liberals, and said that these people
- 6:14are "silly liberals." So, that means
- 6:17they also defend a big state alongside
- 6:20a neoliberal economic regime. That is a
- 6:23corporatist economy, which is a fascist
- 6:26economy. Third point, they understand
- 6:29that they are a much more evolved
- 6:32movement than all the others. So, that
- 6:35means they are better than the PT
- 6:37supporters, the Bolsonaristas, than
- 6:39everyone. And in doing so, they have
- 6:41fascist theorists.
- 6:42>> The MBL defends a big state, at the
- 6:44same time neoliberal.
- 6:45>> Do you think the PT doesn't defend
- 6:47exactly that? The MBL doesn't defend
- 6:49that, okay? But don't you think what
- 6:50the PT defends for the economy is
- 6:52exactly that? No, in fact, we just saw
- 6:54that now at the Banco Master stand, who
- 6:56are the ones involved in corruption
- 6:57scandals with private industry. To say
- 7:00the PT has no relation to big capital
- 7:02and big bankers and big—it's not
- 7:04comparable, man. It's not compared. I
- 7:06don't want to compare anything. The
- 7:07question is very simple.
- 7:08>> The question is very simple. So the PT
- 7:10doesn't answer. The PT has no
- 7:12relationship with big bankers, big
- 7:14capital, or big business. The PT has
- 7:16been in government for 16 years.
- 7:18>> The people elect the PT, right? We are
- 7:20not to blame that the people elect the
- 7:21PT. The people must elect them for some
- 7:22reason.
- 7:23>> Ciro Nogueira who you also...
- 7:24>> No. So the people elect them for a
- 7:25reason, but it won't be elected now.
- 7:27The people, the people...the people
- 7:29elect, it won't be a base for the PT,
- 7:30as you know very well.
- 7:31>> Well, the PT no, he is in opposition.
- 7:33He is in opposition.
- 7:34>> No, he isn't anymore. We don't support
- 7:37him in Piauí. Not Hugo Mota. Ciro
- 7:39Nogueira is.
- 7:40>> Hugo Mota. Do you support Hugo Mota?
- 7:41>> Everyone supports him for speaker of
- 7:42the House.
- 7:43>> Everyone. Who is that? No.
- 7:44>> Ah, the single-vote candidate. He's
- 7:45just...
- 7:46>> he is our candidate.
- 7:47>> All right.
- 7:47>> Did your party support any vote for
- 7:48speaker of the House? supported for
- 7:49speaker of the House, just like...
- 7:51>> and now, who does Hugo Mota support for
- 7:52president of the Republic?
- 7:53>> Hugo Mota supports Lula, thank God. Do
- 7:55you know why he supports him? Do you
- 7:56know why he supports him? Because...you
- 7:58don't know why? Do you know why? Do you
- 8:00know why in the Northeast?
- 8:01>> Because to end poverty in this country.
- 8:03Can I...
- 8:04>> speak? Because in the Northeast...in
- 8:08the Northeast, if you don't support
- 8:10Lula, you don't get votes, brother.
- 8:11Lula is unanimous in the Northeast. If
- 8:13you don't ask for votes for Lula, you
- 8:14don't have votes.
- 8:15>> Got it? This is just unbelievable.
- 8:21People applaud the fact that Hugo Mota,
- 8:23who's on Daniel Vorcaro's phone, votes
- 8:26for Lula. Congratulations, man. The
- 8:30yellow book was written, according to
- 8:32you, by some fascist intellectuals.
- 8:34>> Was that it?
- 8:34>> Yes.
- 8:35>> Name one.
- 8:36>> No, no, I won't. I'm not going to name
- 8:37anyone, my friend. Brother, because
- 8:38here's the thing,
- 8:39>> I'm terrified, man.
- 8:40>> Do you want me to name names here so we
- 8:42get into this legal war? I'm, I'm cool.
- 8:44I'm, I'm, I'm cool with you. Do you
- 8:46agree that fascism is one of the worst
- 8:48things to happen?
- 8:49>> I agree. Of course.
- 8:51>> You come here to the middle of Avenida
- 8:53Paulista and say that my party's
- 8:55proposal book was built with fascist
- 8:57intellectuals. I detest fascism. I want
- 9:00you to tell me which fascist
- 9:01intellectual it is, so I can expel them
- 9:02. Let's go. Let's go. Let's go. It's
- 9:04funny that he changed the subject
- 9:05himself. We are talking about the
- 9:07government, the fascist intellectual of
- 9:08the EBR that I want to expel. Say the
- 9:09name, say the name.
- 9:11>> No, I'm going to I'm going to start
- 9:12with your presidential candidate,
- 9:14because you couldn't refute the issue
- 9:16regarding the family vote. You couldn't
- 9:18refute it. Do you think this project
- 9:21that decides voting by family is okay?
- 9:23>> What project, man.
- 9:24>> It's an idea, a project of theirs.
- 9:25>> Project. This idea came from a tweet by
- 9:28a guy who supports the MBL.
- 9:30>> And he liked it.
- 9:31>> He liked it.
- 9:32>> Renan liked the idea. The "Mamãe Falei
- 9:34" guy himself in our debate.
- 9:35>> Renan liked the idea because the "
- 9:36Mamãe Falei" guy himself in the debate
- 9:37, you come here and say that my party's
- 9:41proposal book was built by fascist
- 9:42intellectuals and you don't have the
- 9:44capacity to name the fascist
- 9:45intellectual. How about capacity,
- 9:47brother, the thing is this, I just
- 9:49spoke about the capacity for the main
- 9:51issue,
- 9:54>> there is no mention of a family vote in
- 9:56my program. What exists is a previous
- 10:00discussion, in other published books,
- 10:02thematic discussions that happen
- 10:03through 200 researchers on democratic
- 10:05models worldwide.
- 10:06>> There is no such defense, so
- 10:08>> no, not only is there no defense, it's
- 10:09not in my program, there is no such
- 10:11mention.
- 10:11>> No, he didn't say that. You're lying
- 10:13once again.
- 10:15>> What the hell with fascism.
- 10:16>> Do you think fascism is cool? We've
- 10:17already debated that. Name like 10.
- 10:19>> You are a fascist.
- 10:21>> You are a fascist. The last time
- 10:27>> you are the embodiment of it.
- 10:29>> The last time I debated, that had 5
- 10:30million views, right, V? You know
- 10:33>> who wants to know what the fascist
- 10:34motto is. They want to know the fascist
- 10:37motto. We all know what it is
- 10:39>> what is it
- 10:40>> God, family.
- 10:46>> Let's go, boss. What is your name?
- 10:48Sorry.
- 10:49>> Paulo, have you ever seen me say that
- 10:50phrase once in your life? it's the
- 10:52little friend who's asking what the
- 10:53motto is, not the little friend, you're
- 10:55the one who asked.
- 10:56>> I told him.
- 10:57>> Hey Paulo, Paulo, Paulo, have you ever
- 10:59heard the fascist motto? Have you ever
- 11:01heard of it?
- 11:02>> Have you ever seen me say it?
- 11:03>> Oh, okay. Oh, good.
- 11:05>> It's just that the guys applauded here.
- 11:06Not me. Have you ever heard this phrase
- 11:08?
- 11:08>> Have you ever heard it?
- 11:09>> I didn't hear it, but that's fine, I
- 11:10won't.
- 11:11>> I just want.
- 11:11>> So, thanks. Thanks. Thank you. Thank
- 11:13you, okay? Man, ask what a legal
- 11:15betting site is. Just read the bill
- 11:17approved by the Lula government that
- 11:18regulates betting sites.
- 11:19>> So, but do you defend the decree then?
- 11:21Do you defend Lula's decree
- 11:23>> the way it is? No.
- 11:24>> Why?
- 11:25>> As it stands, it simply bans the legal
- 11:27betting sites that he himself legalized
- 11:29. That I find absurd.
- 11:31>> But that was a step, the regulation was
- 11:33a step.
- 11:33>> A step isn't enough. Hey Léo, let's
- 11:34look at this.
- 11:35>> Brazil needs to have legal certainty.
- 11:37Lula went there, regulated the betting
- 11:38sites, and said: "These betting sites
- 11:40are illegal." I agree. The "little
- 11:42tiger" is illegal. I agree. Those
- 11:44betting sites have a certain deadline
- 11:46to get regularized. Those betting sites
- 11:49that Lula, Lula, not me, that Lula said
- 11:50could be regularized, went there and
- 11:52got regularized. A few months went by,
- 11:55Lula said: "You are banned." In other
- 11:57words, let's say, I don't know, a guy
- 11:59has a barbecue stand, he goes and gets
- 12:01it regularized. He pays for all his
- 12:03things properly, gets his permit signed
- 12:05, everything is correct. Some time
- 12:07passes, the government goes there and
- 12:08says: "Are you regularized? Did you pay
- 12:10your permit?" I don't care. Brazil
- 12:12needs to have, if Lula wanted to,
- 12:14>> yes,
- 12:14>> if Lula wanted to ban betting sites, he
- 12:16shouldn't have done that regularization
- 12:18. What I defend, which they asked about
- 12:21, is having financial education in
- 12:22schools, of course.
- 12:24>> Because a country that has financial
- 12:26education can have legal betting. Legal
- 12:28betting happens in many countries. If
- 12:31we take, for example, the United
- 12:32Kingdom, they have sports betting. The
- 12:35UK there
- 12:36>> is logical, I'm not comparing it.
- 12:37>> We have a people, a people we have a
- 12:39people, a very simple people, a very
- 12:41humble people, who are the main target
- 12:43of these betting sites. It is the, it
- 12:45is the main target of these betting
- 12:46sites.
- 12:47>> No, no, I want to understand. I
- 12:48understand, but
- 12:50>> you're comparing Brazil and the United
- 12:51States. No. What is the difference
- 12:52regarding this specific case of the
- 12:53United Kingdom,
- 12:55>> which is a country that I think is the
- 12:56most famous for sports betting, but if
- 12:58you bring it into the debate, it's
- 12:59subject to being compared.
- 13:01>> What do I think the problem is in this
- 13:03specific case? Hey, I'm talking about a
- 13:04proposal. If you guys don't pay
- 13:06attention when I'm talking about a
- 13:07proposal, right? It gets difficult.
- 13:11>> Now, for example,
- 13:13>> what's missing is financial education
- 13:15in schools. Today, the guy there looks,
- 13:16do you think it's important?
- 13:17>> I do. Of course I think it's important.
- 13:19>> Do you think so? I think, yes, I think
- 13:20it's important. Pause, pause, pause.
- 13:22Calm down, calm down. About your
- 13:24project that you're going to talk about
- 13:26, what am I going to say
- 13:27>> about your project, let's go
- 13:28>> then. Tell us. I’m, I’m already
- 13:30subscribed. Let’s go. Let’s go. I,
- 13:32I, the thing is this. My project that
- 13:34he mentioned is to put financial
- 13:35education in schools. Thanks to my
- 13:38approved law, 3 million students in
- 13:39São Paulo have access to financial
- 13:41education.
- 13:42>> Do you know what the issue is? Do you
- 13:43know what the issue is? The issue is
- 13:44this.
- 13:44>> Having financial education in schools.
- 13:46>> No, the project, the project isn't bad.
- 13:48Nobody said the project
- 13:50>> damn, you guys are against financial
- 13:52education.
- 13:52>> The point isn't the project. The point
- 13:55is that if you're earning $ 0, how the
- 13:57hell are you going to manage that? No,
- 14:01this is a real issue, brother.
- 14:03>> It's just that I've seen some of your
- 14:04videos debating right-wing guys that I
- 14:06don't consider the brightest. Now, I
- 14:07thought you were better, man.
- 14:11>> It doesn't mean that if a guy earns $
- 14:131500, $ 0, it's not important for him
- 14:15to have financial education.
- 14:16>> Wow, wow. Look, look at this, Guto.
- 14:18Look, look how stubborn you are. The
- 14:20guy, the guy, look at this. The guy, oh
- 14:23brother, there’s no way.
- 14:26>> Oh brother, oh brother, oh brother, let
- 14:27me tell you something. The guy, the guy
- 14:29spends, the guy, the guy spends, the
- 14:32guy spends everything on groceries, on
- 14:35rent, and still ends up in debt.
- 14:47>> Erica it's Erica.
- 14:53>> Let's go. Let's finish this, right?
- 14:54>> Let’s go. Let’s go. What is the
- 14:56importance of having financial
- 14:57education in schools? So that young
- 14:59people don't fall for scams, don't fall
- 15:01for legal betting, so they don't think
- 15:03that legal betting, legalized by your
- 15:05government, is a reason for investment
- 15:07or enrichment, but rather a sports bet,
- 15:09which is what it actually is. So that
- 15:12young people know how to handle their
- 15:13own money, know the difference between
- 15:15credit and debit, so they don't get
- 15:16into debt while their credit record is
- 15:17clean, which is before they receive
- 15:19their first paycheck.
- 15:20>> The theory of the project is important,
- 15:22I support it. The point is that
- 15:24material conditions are important too.
- 15:27If the guy has no money to manage, he
- 15:30has nothing to manage, right?
- 15:31>> Yes he does, of course he does. Of
- 15:33course he does. When we talk about
- 15:34financial education, choosing between
- 15:36the shack for $ 300 and the shack for $
- 15:38400. No, but that’s the reality,
- 15:40brother. Financial education is for
- 15:42people to make better choices
- 15:43throughout life. I’m telling the guy
- 15:45that’s the issue. We defend that too.
- 15:47>> You guys defend that?
- 15:48>> Well, logically, obviously.
- 15:49>> Why did the Workers 'Party vote against
- 15:51this project?
- 15:54>> You defend the 6-for-1 shift? I do. Do
- 15:57you defend the project that ended the 6
- 15:59-for-1 scale now?
- 16:00>> Erika Hilton's project.
- 16:01>> So there is a difference between
- 16:02defending something and defending the
- 16:03project.
- 16:04>> So that means you are against my
- 16:06project, but you defend the idea.
- 16:07>> Exactly.
- 16:08>> What in my project do you disagree with
- 16:10?
- 16:11>> That it has no grounding in reality,
- 16:12that it lacks budget provisions, it
- 16:14says nothing about budget issues.
- 16:16>> But my God, aren't you? It doesn't have
- 16:18it,
- 16:18>> it doesn't have it. And
- 16:19>> it doesn't have it. Can I speak then?
- 16:20>> Go ahead. And the third, and the third
- 16:23issue, and the third issue is that you
- 16:25don't create conditions for these kids
- 16:27to have money.
- 16:29>> For example, are you against the "Pé
- 16:30de Meia"?
- 16:31>> I am against it.
- 16:33>> So, how are you against a high school
- 16:35student having a little extra money at
- 16:37the end of their schooling? It prevents
- 16:41school dropout, you know?
- 16:42>> It avoids school dropout and such. So,
- 16:43if you—calm down, can I answer? You
- 16:46talked, I talked, I am against it. Why
- 16:47am I against the current model of "Pé
- 16:49de Meia"? I think what? My educational
- 16:51cashback project is much better than
- 16:52the "Pé de Meia". Why? The educational
- 16:55cashback gives a little money to the
- 16:57student who reaches the end of their
- 16:59studies or graduates from school or
- 17:00university. But only if they are a good
- 17:03student, if they have school attendance
- 17:05, if they have good behavior, if they
- 17:07have good grades. Now, I refuse to give
- 17:09money to a student who doesn't get a
- 17:12nine or a 10. I refuse to give money to
- 17:14a student who has bad behavior. Entered
- 17:17a classroom. I, as a history teacher,
- 17:22>> can tell you exactly how you don't
- 17:23understand reality. We deal with
- 17:27diverse students who come from...Do you
- 17:29want to be a pro?
- 17:30>> I don't really care.
- 17:31>> I don't insist on talking. I’ll just
- 17:33keep on talking.
- 17:34>> Leo is leaving because he has to
- 17:36campaign. He’s right. And he made an
- 17:37arrangement. That’s the agreement. A
- 17:39deal is a deal. This guy is going to
- 17:40disappear from the video. He won't be
- 17:42the next to accept. Stay well.
- 17:44>> Hey Guto, let's go. It's just that,
- 17:45really
- 17:46>> a promise to you, huh?
- 17:47>> It’s just that it’s very clear to
- 17:49me that while some ideas might be
- 17:51well-intentioned, you are completely
- 17:53unaware of the material reality of
- 17:55things. There is a decay under the
- 17:58Tarcísio administration, where you
- 17:59were deputy leader, right? Uh, very
- 18:02serious. In the history of São Paulo
- 18:04state, adjusted for inflation, which is
- 18:06the largest budget in the history of
- 18:07education?
- 18:08>> And you know what’s interesting? Even
- 18:10though it is, in absolute terms, the
- 18:11largest budget in the history of São
- 18:12Paulo state, where is that money going?
- 18:14>> So you’re saying that the largest
- 18:15education budget in São Paulo's
- 18:17history, adjusted for inflation, is the
- 18:19current one. That’s it.
- 18:21>> The education budget, which is a
- 18:22multi-billion budget, it’s simply
- 18:24going to the FEDER so they can sell
- 18:25their own teaching materials to destroy
- 18:27the entire education system. Let’s go
- 18:30. What is the largest budget in the
- 18:31history of education? What is it?
- 18:34>> Answer me, brother. I said that. So?
- 18:38>> I approved the largest education budget
- 18:39in the history of São Paulo state
- 18:41>> and it’s going to, look, look. He
- 18:44>> Thank you, thank you, thank you, thank
- 18:46you. You can, you can search Leonardo
- 18:48Grandini’s social media to see when
- 18:49he criticized Lula for cutting 32
- 18:53billion reais from the Ministry of
- 18:54Education. That’s a lie. That’s a
- 18:56lie.
- 18:57>> That’s a lie. That’s a lie.
- 18:59That’s a lie. That’s a lie. But
- 19:01let’s move on. I studied in public
- 19:03schools my whole life. My mother has
- 19:06been a public school teacher her whole
- 19:07life. I am the son of a public school
- 19:09teacher my whole life. I was a titular
- 19:11member, I was a titular member of the
- 19:13Education and Culture Commission of the
- 19:15São Paulo State Assembly. And before
- 19:17you, teachers, stands the deputy who
- 19:20put the most money into São Paulo’s
- 19:23education, more than any PT deputy or
- 19:25>> that’s great. But if you did that,
- 19:27congratulations, brother. No one is
- 19:28questioning that. Calm down, calm down,
- 19:29calm down. I put millions of reais into
- 19:32public schools as a state deputy.
- 19:35>> Did you monitor what you put in, sir?
- 19:36>> It was 11 million reais allocated to
- 19:38several institutions. None of the
- 19:40education ones had corruption. How are
- 19:42you monitoring it? Yes,
- 19:45>> man. There was Campinas, there was
- 19:47Osasco, there was Guarulhos, there was
- 19:48Ribeirão Preto, it’s not just one,
- 19:50it’s 11 million reais allocated to
- 19:52several places. I’ll be going then, I
- 19:53need to leave,
- 19:54>> there you go. Then the guy votes for
- 19:56the PT
- 19:57>> and doesn't demand from the PT guys who
- 19:58didn't allocate as much as I did. Leo,
- 20:00Leo, Leo.
- 20:01>> Thank you. Good luck. Thank you, thank
- 20:03you, thank you for your attention. Vote
- 20:0877.
- 20:09>> I'm going with people, it's motor7.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of DEBATI COM LEO GRANDINI DO PT - Valendo PIX de R$ 200 by Vote Guto Zacarias 1477, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 4,045 words across 651 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.