YT YouTube2Text

YouTube2Text → Transcripts → YouTube transcript (d_f3hJCRsAc)

YouTube transcript (d_f3hJCRsAc) — Transcript

9,617 words · 1,454 segments · language en · Watch on YouTube

Open in transcriber Summarize with AI Download SRT/VTT

Full transcript

0:00This week, Kim's case came to light.
0:04Kim is a little girl, only 5 years old.
0:08Kim's mother, uh, made a series of
0:11posts on social media, including one
0:14that has been widely questioned because
0:17Kim's mother uploaded posts where her
0:20little girl, her 5-year-old girl, is
0:23screaming.
0:25Why did she react like this if she was
0:27her patient? I mean, like the Miku
0:28thing, for example. I mean, of
0:30course, but let's see, it's the same
0:32thing that happens with
0:33psychotherapists when suddenly you say,
0:35uh, the psychotherapist and the patient
0:37fell in love, it happens very often.
0:39And after a year, the patient met up
0:41with the psychotherapist again, she was
0:43no longer his patient, and they started
0:45dating. It is ethically strange; it is
0:48not quite right, but not bad either. It
0:51has been a year since she saw you. Yes,
0:52yes, yes, Mr. Doctor. It's good that
0:54they have degrees and everything and
0:56that there is...But why don't they have
0:57IDs? You, Mr. Doctor, are the first
0:59ones demanding IDs. Why are Dr.
1:02Abigail's psychiatry and child
1:04psychiatry credentials not appearing
1:06anywhere? So, it was about working,
1:09mothering, doing what you can do best
1:12on a day-to-day basis, and yes, I mean,
1:15administrative procedures weren't a
1:18priority, until the Marilyn Coat case
1:21came out.
1:22How many of these cases do you think
1:24are currently happening? Cases where
1:27someone who is or claims to be an
1:29expert in psychological health uses
1:32your fears, your guilt, or public
1:34attention in order to monetize as much
1:36as possible, from using pseudoscience
1:39to free abusers or aggressors to
1:41introducing religious biases to
1:43invalidate harm to minors. Psychology
1:46is not a game, nor should it be used as
1:48a weapon. However, in this video you
1:51will see how it is possible to do it to
1:54perhaps help you avoid falling for
1:56someone similar. But before continuing,
1:59how are my friends? Let me introduce
2:01myself, my name is Ortme, let's see how
2:04your health and that of others can be a
2:07good business for questionable people.
2:13What happens when a piece of quackery
2:15ends up being considered as solid
2:17evidence within a court of law? In the
2:20year 2024, Marifer Centeno would be the
2:23center of news and internet forums for
2:26her war against Mr. Doctor, a medical
2:29influencer who exposed how she used
2:32graphology to make harmful, false, or
2:35in some cases illegal or even political
2:38comments. Many of you are already
2:40familiar with the controversy, since
2:42I've talked about it for a long time
2:43and even Mr. Doctor has even made a few
2:45visits to this channel, so I won't bore
2:47you with the filler. All you need to
2:49know is that Marifer has been using
2:51graphology for years to make herself
2:53known on internet forums, news programs
2:55, or any place that allows it, selling
2:58this branch as a medical solution for
3:00losing weight or even starring in
3:02conflicts that I would summarize as
3:04comical. However, as you can imagine,
3:06today we are not going to talk about
3:08simple comic cases. It is important to
3:10understand that graphology is defined
3:12as the attempt to determine personality
3:15traits, emotional states or behavioral
3:17profiles based on the handwritten
3:19strokes or signature of an individual.
3:21In other words, based on a stroke of
3:23ink, it can determine what behaviors
3:24you have or what emotional state you
3:26were in when you made your signature.
3:28If you are having trouble connecting
3:30your brain and understanding why what I
3:32have just said is the biggest stupidity
3:34of the 21st century, don't worry, I
3:36will break it down for you very slowly.
3:38Psychology and behavioral behavioral
3:40therapy, which is currently the most
3:42validated and supported by scientists,
3:44complies with the three strictest
3:46standards of the scientific method:
3:48falsifiability, replicability and
3:50predictive capacity. A statement is
3:52falsifiable when there is a possibility
3:55or experiment designed to demonstrate
3:57that it is false. And why did I want to
3:59demonstrate that my statement is false?
4:00Let's take an example where it is said
4:03that cognitive restructuring will
4:04reduce a patient's panic attacks. To do
4:07this, the number of seizures is
4:08systematically measured and if the data
4:11shows that the seizures do not decrease
4:13, the hypothesis can be refuted and
4:15treatment adjusted. If false ability
4:17did not exist, we would not even know
4:19how many options there are to diagnose
4:21a patient and we would be going round
4:23and round in circles with a useless
4:26solution. Science also requires that if
4:28another researcher performs the same
4:30experiment under the same conditions,
4:33they will have consistent results. This
4:36is known as replicability. Conductive
4:39behavioral therapy uses standardized
4:41protocols such as intervention manuals,
4:43which guarantees that five
4:45psychologists with the same patient
4:47will obtain a comparable margin of
4:49efficacy, so their diagnoses may differ
4:52somewhat due to perspective or
4:54circumstance, but they will have a very
4:56close margin. Finally, the constructs
4:59of conductive behavioral therapy, such
5:01as automatic thoughts or behavior
5:03patterns, are isolated and
5:04experimentally controlled in randomized
5:06clinical trials to demonstrate that
5:09they have internal validity. This is
5:11called predictive capacity and control
5:13of variables. Doesn't it happen to you
5:15that one of your friends or even you,
5:18by watching anime or TV series, ends up
5:21adopting some type of behavior or even
5:24imitating a disorder? Well, these
5:26patterns are expected when you go to
5:29behavioral therapy. That's why they are
5:32evaluated and tested to see if they are
5:34valid. If we try to apply these same
5:37three rules to graphology, first of all
5:39we will understand that there is no
5:41such thing as false skill, since
5:42graphological interpretations are
5:44usually extremely vague and simply
5:46generalized phrases that tend to fall
5:48into the Barnom effect. A bias that
5:50leads individuals to feel identified
5:52with descriptions that could, in
5:54reality, apply to almost anyone. If a
5:56graphologist were to say that my or
5:58being very round means that I am very
6:00kind, there would be no experiment
6:02designed to demonstrate that this is
6:05false. Obviously, there is no
6:07replicability either, since if you give
6:09a signature to five different
6:11graphologists without giving them
6:13context or information about the
6:15patient, all five will give you a
6:17completely different diagnosis. Finally
6:19, there is no predictive capacity,
6:21since there is no way to expect
6:23anything about the personality,
6:25morality or performance of individuals
6:28based on their signature. What I have
6:30just told you is probably a lot of
6:32nonsense, but believe me, it is very
6:35important to differentiate between real
6:37science and the crap that pretends to
6:39be, since as a YouTuber I can
6:41distinguish them perfectly, but
6:43apparently Mexican law does not. In
6:452023, the case of Mariel, a mother of
6:48two little girls who reported their own
6:52father for abusing these girls, would
6:55be known. It is worth noting that
6:58Father Manuel Horacio Cabazos is a
7:00former magistrate, so you can get an
7:03idea of the power and influence he can
7:06have. Since this is a criminal
7:08complaint, it obviously has much more
7:11serious consequences and as far as we
7:13know, graphology cannot be used in this
7:16type of trial, but you can hire the
7:18services of an expert in family cases.
7:21According to Mariel herself, Manuel
7:23would put the criminal complaint aside
7:26to file a family law complaint to take
7:28custody of the same minors who
7:30identified him as their aggressor.
7:33Let's see, it's quite clear to me that
7:35there is still no legal resolution to
7:38this case, but personally I am very
7:40suspicious that instead of addressing
7:42the criminal complaint that you have
7:44filed, you decide to open not one but
7:47seven different investigation files
7:49against the mother. And in one of them,
7:52you involve handwriting experts to take
7:55custody of the same little ones.
7:57According to Mariel, he would get his
8:00signature from old notebooks, where
8:02great experts in nothing would dictate
8:05the following stupidity. That's how
8:07the isolated letters were interpreted.
8:10When I sign the L, I make the L
8:12handwritten, which is the term of my
8:15name, Mariel, right? The last letter,
8:17which is a dagger. How do you want me
8:18to do the L? No, I mean, the way I
8:21write it is absurd. That L is a dagger
8:24and then they find traits of evil in me
8:27. Uh, I enjoy doing harm. My name is
8:31Mariel handwritten, right? Abbreviated
8:34there and everything, but come on, it
8:36starts with an M, how do I do it? Right
8:38? And they say that the first curve of
8:41the M has a scorpion's tail and a
8:44boar's tooth. And then when I finish
8:47the L which is a line, they say there's
8:50a dagger, right? A dagger. Here are the
8:52images so you can see them, I mean,
8:54because I already showed these images
8:55in the videos, but here so you can
8:57realize that with that they already
8:58said that you were an evil person,
9:00right? Well, that I enjoy doing harm,
9:03hurting animals. Let's go. According to
9:06news portals, there is evidence that
9:08confirms the crime of the former
9:10magistrate, such as the statements of
9:12the victims, audios, reports from the
9:14prosecution that confirm that the
9:16attacks occurred, among others. You
9:19might think that this is all for this
9:21section, but if that were the case, I
9:23wouldn't have even included Marifer;
9:24because reading the expressions of the
9:26Nodal family to give us the most
9:28obvious interpretation in the world is
9:30not the only thing this graphologist
9:32has done, because in 2024 the case of
9:34little Kim, a pseudonym that was used
9:36by the mother to protect the identity
9:38of this minor, would go viral. It turns
9:40out that this little girl would be in
9:42the Graciano Viniegra kindergarten in
9:45Mexicali, Baja California. Dulce, Kim's
9:47mother, would go to pick her up from
9:50school for a simple minor discomfort.
9:53But some time later, Dulce would open
9:55an investigation file against Eliseo N
9:57for the crime against her daughter. The
10:00case went viral very quickly and there
10:03were many doubts on social media,
10:05because at first the recordings showed
10:07a little girl leaving the facilities
10:09happily and without any apparent damage
10:11. It also became a trend that Dulce
10:13would delete photos with her supposed
10:16partner, when, according to her
10:17statements, she did not currently have
10:19a partner, which obviously raised
10:21suspicions on social media. In addition
10:24, the teacher looked quite affected on
10:26camera, so the inclination of social
10:28media was to believe him and reject
10:30Dulce's statement. Do you want to help
10:33me guess who was the most important
10:35pillar that gave strength to these
10:37theories? This is Eliseo's video, who
10:40is explaining what an open stance is,
10:42but he implies that what happened was
10:44not at school, to such a degree that he
10:47is forceful, but above all, consistent.
10:50What are we looking for? Congruence.
10:52This congruence is that what I say with
10:54words is reflected in gestures. We see
10:56him willing to speak. We see him all
10:59the time with an open stance, with
11:00broad illustrations. A person who also
11:03provides a great many elements whenever
11:06he has to make an argument. When I say
11:09there is an open stance, I mean that
11:11there are no barriers to communication.
11:12He is showing his palms and it also
11:15generates more confidence in his speech
11:17. It is also known as powerful body
11:19language. Why? Because everything that
11:22makes you look bigger generates an idea
11:25and an image of confidence in the brain
11:28. We see him desperate, we see him
11:30convinced of what he says. Of course,
11:32nothing guarantees a lie, just as
11:34nothing guarantees the truth. However,
11:36from the point of view of body language
11:38, it seems to me that there is
11:40consistency; but, above all, I think
11:42that this opens up another line of
11:43research: saying that it wasn't at
11:45school. But the reality is that we do
11:48see a very angry woman and a very
11:50worried man with great consistency that
11:52has two elements, both saying "there is
11:55evidence that she left school very
11:57happy and that it wasn't at school" and
12:00the issue of money. Desperate, scared,
12:03afraid. Let's look at the body language
12:05of this man, this man Eliseo G, who is
12:07one of the possible people involved,
12:09but also take into account that the
12:11stepfather is someone else, but notice
12:13the fear, notice the terror on this
12:15man's face. I want you to see that at
12:17all times the posture is open, that is,
12:20it is open to communication,
12:21communication is not being blocked, it
12:23is an open posture, the corners of the
12:25mouth are completely down, which
12:27reflects sadness. All this frowning is
12:30stress. It is not even so much anger as
12:32a lot of stress. Some say, "You must
12:35believe absolutely." I believe that one
12:37cannot simply think in terms of
12:40absolute belief, especially when even
12:42the stepfather is apparently involved.
12:45It is a face that corresponds more to
12:47disgust and anger than to sadness. We
12:48do not see tears, but we do see a
12:49finger that seems to say, "My truth is
12:50the only one." We do not see tears, but
12:52we do see a finger that says, "My truth
12:52is the only one. My truth is the only
12:53one.""She's Kim's mom, who's wearing
12:56these sunglasses that reflect both
12:59protection and a defense mechanism, and
13:02of course, of course she's hiding,
13:05right? In a way, she's protecting
13:08herself, she's hiding.
13:09Why do we get close?
13:11Why do we get close?" She makes a
13:13disgusted face when she refers to the
13:15school, when she refers to the
13:16principal. On social media, they say
13:19that this has to do with her stepfather
13:21more than with, sorry, the directors or
13:24the people who worked or are working at
13:26this school. I repeat, some say it was
13:29her stepfather, some think it was the
13:31teachers. We're going to wait and see
13:34what happens, but she's definitely not
13:36willing to negotiate or change her mind
13:39, much less think that it could be her
13:42stepfather who's behind it. Look at
13:44this face, it's Kim's mom, but it seems
13:46like she has a happy look. We were
13:48talking a minute ago about this bright
13:52look. We were talking about these
13:54bright and happy eyes. Well, at least
13:57In this image, well, the corners of the
13:59mouth turn up. While it is true that
14:01there is great desperation in much of
14:04the video, there are some moments where
14:06you are smiling and this generates
14:08great suspicion. However, well, we are
14:11talking about how smiling is done with
14:13the eyes. It is called smiling with the
14:16eyes, even this is strange, as it is
14:18also typical when he says my boy and
14:21refers to the girl, right? If I tell
14:24you my dog, the dog, my house, the
14:27house. I am giving very simple examples
14:30if you want, perhaps they are not the
14:32right ones, but what I am saying is
14:35when my boy, well, I feel much closer
14:37than saying the girl, my house, the
14:39house. However, the face of teacher
14:42Eliseo was of desperation, of fear in
14:45the purest state, because an accusation
14:48like that can destroy not only your
14:50reputation, but your life. During this
14:54speech, Kim's mother, which actually
14:56lasts 5 or 6 minutes, the mother says
14:58that there is a money issue, that there
15:00is an issue with the school's insurance
15:03. This also emphasizes the teacher with
15:05the Insurance issue. What happened to
15:07the money? It's important because the
15:10priority in the mother's narrative
15:13should always be the girl. Now, what do
15:15we see? An expression of disgust. What
15:18are glasses for? To protect ourselves,
15:20to hide vulnerability if you like, to
15:22project an image of power, or if you
15:25prefer, to hide our fear and to hide
15:27our deep anguish. Another thing that's
15:29important to mention is that when you
15:31want to convey a message and you want
15:33to appear transparent and communicate
15:35accurately, don't wear sunglasses. Why?
15:37Because if your eyes are the window to
15:41your soul, you're closing off the most
15:43important window, which is eye signals.
15:45Another thing that I think is important
15:47to mention is that no, he's not a good
15:49communicator. And as for Eliseo, let's
15:52look for consistency. Is there
15:53consistency with what he's saying with
15:55words and gestures? Yes. A specific
15:58question requires a specific answer,
16:00yes. Something you need to know in
16:02order to get to know Marifer Centeno is
16:04that her judgment fluctuates depending
16:06on comments on social media; therefore,
16:08if People see the teacher as completely
16:11innocent and Dulce's family as guilty.
16:13Marifer just nods her head and starts
16:16making accusations, false statements,
16:18or simple hateful comments that, rather
16:21than supporting the victim, put more
16:24pressure on a criminal complaint, which
16:27in some cases can go quite well for a
16:29disinformer, but in this case it went
16:32quite badly for Marifer. In June 2025,
16:35it would be announced that the ICO N
16:37had already faced a similar accusation
16:40in the past, since in 2016 he was
16:43accused of an 8-year-old boy while he
16:45was a music teacher at the
16:47Melchorocampo kindergarten. There is a
16:50file and a psychological evaluation
16:52with visible identification, but there
16:54is a line in this news that made me
16:56think. The minor's mother confronted
16:59Eliseo and he arrogantly told her, "I
17:01am innocent. I don't know who you
17:03brought into your house. It wasn't me."
17:05So that you understand why this line is
17:07important to me, I'm going to read you
17:09some of the comments that were left on
17:11the videos where Marí Ferma talked
17:13about this case before this previous
17:15complaint was made public. There are
17:17people who spread falsehoods and
17:19defamations. Those lenses make me
17:21distrustful. Sexual offenders look for
17:24vulnerable people and this woman
17:26doesn't look vulnerable. They're
17:28investigating the stepfather. Many
17:30women protect their man before their
17:32children. The stepfather raped her, but
17:34why did he run away? The teacher is
17:36innocent. Who are they protecting? I'm
17:39not saying that there wasn't any abuse
17:40in itself. But what do the audios mean
17:43then? Why did the boyfriend disappear?
17:46Investigate the brother and the
17:47stepfather. I want us to do an exercise
17:50together and imagine that we are a 15-
17:52year-old teenager. You get ready, go to
17:55school like every day and when you
17:57arrive you find out that you are
17:59accused and seen by all your classmates
18:02as the alleged aggressor of your little
18:04sister who is only 3 years old. Now
18:07consider what the mother of the first
18:10victim said and ask yourselves why
18:12Marifer, before going against Eliseo,
18:15went against Dulce's family. How likely
18:18is it that Marifer received an offer
18:21from Eliseo N to be able to put this
18:23doubt on social media? I leave that to
18:27your consideration. When this first
18:29complaint from ICON was made public and
18:31everything fell apart for Marifar
18:33Centeno, she went out and did what she
18:35always does in these cases. This is a
18:38video for Kim's mother because I really
18:41haven't even been able to rest well
18:44thinking about her and thinking about
18:47Kim. The truth is that I don't want to
18:50justify myself. It is clear to me that,
18:54like all the media, I touched on the
18:57subject and tried, for example, not to
18:59...I never put the audios, I never, uh
19:02...I mean, I talked about the press
19:04conference that Mrs. Dulce gave, but in
19:07no way was it my intention to cause
19:10pain, on the contrary; and on this
19:12issue of consciences what I ask for is
19:15forgiveness, I really understand
19:17perfectly if you want it or not. accept
19:20them, but oh well. No, there they are
19:23with all my heart and with all the pain
19:26, right? It is also true that sometimes
19:29, well, these types of situations, what
19:32I am experiencing, make you very
19:34sensitive to the pain of others.
19:37Marifer, I know that I am nobody to get
19:39involved in this case, since I am
19:41neither a relative nor someone who
19:43knows little Kim. But it takes a lot of
19:46guts to appear in a video with your
19:49head down and with your voice so broken
19:52, almost crying. When you were the
19:55first one responsible for the excessive
19:58harassment of Dulce, little Kim and her
20:01older brother. All for what, Marifer?
20:03For a few measly views. I mean, at
20:06least you made good money off of Kim's
20:08pain. And no, don't worry, I don't plan
20:11on offending you or sending you hate
20:13messages, since knowing you, you are
20:16very capable of making false
20:17accusations just to silence those of us
20:20who expose you. What I do ask of you as
20:23a favor, my friend, is that you put an
20:26end to it already. Stay calm, I feel
20:28like I'm defending you tooth and nail,
20:31because now it turns out that I'm in
20:34groups that are harassing you and that
20:36my family is also being reported for
20:39extortion.
20:40And yes, it just so happens that these
20:41guys work like this. They learned their
20:43boss's modus operandi very well. Well,
20:45by now, you should know that the person
20:47who is accusing you on social media,
20:49along with their family members, are
20:51being reported precisely for harassing
20:53people, threatening them, and doxxing
20:55them. I mean, as far as I know, not
20:57even the names of my family members are
20:59known, since they are not public
21:01figures. But hey, if this idiot stooped
21:04to kissing the balls of the same Dallas
21:07Review, what wouldn't he do to earn
21:10another hug from you, Marifer? This is
21:13what happens when we want to give the
21:15same scientific validity to something
21:17that is much closer to horoscopes, but
21:19the next case is not going to be the
21:21same. Okay, here I'm going to be a
21:26little careful because we're starting
21:28to get into trouble. Adrian Salama,
21:31unlike Marifer Centeno, does not have
21:33one, but three professional
21:35certificates. However, these have
21:37something quite striking. First of all,
21:39all three certificates come from Hestal
21:41University, founded by Dr. Héctor
21:43Salama. Tell me, does that last name
21:46ring a bell?
21:47So, I studied at Gestalt University,
21:49which is my parents 'university, and it
21:50was cool. It was an open system at that
21:53time because we lacked resources; they
21:55simply provided a manual, you studied
21:57it, and then you went to take the exams
22:00. That was all your work. Well, it was
22:02really cool, really easy for me, I
22:04loved reading and I just started to see
22:06about the master's degree. I
22:08finished my psychology degree and
22:10jumped right in; I mean, I didn't even
22:12attend graduation. I got my master's
22:14degree, I got
22:15that master's degree from the
22:16university itself. I did everything at
22:18my parents' university and a lot of
22:19people criticize me for that, right? A
22:21lot of people say, "That's fraud and I
22:24don't know what else." And that's where
22:26I ask, of course, from the perspective
22:28of someone lazy,
22:29right? And someone whose parents are
22:31probably a bit delinquent. Of course,
22:32your parents will help you, but when
22:34you come from academic parents—my dad
22:36has always been a teacher, my mom was
22:38always a teacher, and a doctor, she was
22:40always a teacher—they are much more
22:42demanding, you know? Okay.
22:43And so for them, this was a trade. For
22:45them, it was like, you have to learn
22:47well. And the teachers around them, who
22:49taught the classes, were like, "Oh,
22:52you're Hector's son." Wow, it was much
22:55more difficult. "
22:56Yes. Salama has three certificates
22:58obtained from the same university that
23:01her parents founded for a degree that
23:03did not exist in Mexico until her
23:05parents introduced it. Such as the
23:07school of graphology founded by María
23:10del Carmen Muñoz, Marifer Centeno's
23:13mother. Another interesting fact about
23:15Gestalt therapy is that, like
23:17graphology, it is not governed by the
23:19scientific method, but curiously it is
23:21not considered pseudoscience. Let me
23:23explain: unlike behavioral therapy,
23:25which complies with all scientific
23:27rules to be valid, Gestalt therapy is
23:30much better known for placing the
23:32entire burden of the problem on the
23:34patient's neurosis, so the system that
23:36surrounds it is completely ignored and
23:38everything is minimized to a problem
23:40with internal solutions.
23:42Because the way in which Gestalt
23:44therapy understands mental health is
23:46not the same as the way in which
23:48systemic therapy understands mental
23:50health. Why in broad terms? In very
23:53simple terms,
23:55broadly speaking, for example, if a
23:57person is depressed because can't find
24:00a job, the gestalt will tell you,"
24:02There's a neurosis because you're
24:04trying to find a job that you're not
24:07finding. "So, you have to find the
24:09tools to be able to deal with that
24:11neurosis. And a systemic tells you:"
24:14Socially, the problem is like this;
24:17perhaps another option should be found
24:19before aspiring. "I mean, it's like
24:22being more aware of the environment
24:25before blaming the individual for
24:27causing their problems, because there
24:30are problems that have nothing to do
24:33with oneself. I mean, then, uh...that's
24:35why I tell you it's like water and oil,
24:38because while one tries to find an
24:40explanation that has to do with the
24:42neurosis, one begins to discard things.
24:46There is
24:47no falsifiability, since if the patient
24:49does not improve, the therapist will
24:51completely blame their neurosis and
24:53will be going around in circles with a
24:56one-way solution. There is no
24:58replicability, since there is no
25:00standardized process for this therapy
25:02and it only depends on the perspective
25:05that the therapist in question wants to
25:07take and there is even less predictive
25:10capacity, since Gestalt does not intend
25:12to reduce some specific symptoms, but
25:14simply to achieve extremely vague
25:17things such as the patient's
25:18self-realization or self-knowledge. And
25:23how do I translate that into scientific
25:25terms? Salama. The reason why Gestalt
25:28is not on the side of The occultism and
25:30graphology are simply because of the
25:32mix it has with Gestalt psychology,
25:34which is a real science. Born in
25:37Germany in 1912, it was dedicated to
25:39studying how the human brain perceives
25:41the world. Its founders, whose names
25:43are difficult to pronounce, but I'll
25:45leave them here, conducted rigorous
25:47experiments that complied with all the
25:49rules of the scientific method. But
25:51years later, in 1940, Fritz Pears would
25:53create a model of psychotherapy that
25:56took some concepts from the psychology
25:58of perception and mixed them with
26:00existentialism, humanism and theater,
26:03naming it Gestalt therapy. In other
26:05words, Gestalt psychology is often
26:07confused with Gestalt therapy, giving
26:09it a scientific weight that it does not
26:12have. Just as graphology tries to mix
26:14it with graphoscopy, which is a valid
26:16method used to see if a stroke in a
26:19contract, check or promissory note is
26:21real. Would you believe that so many
26:23similarities between Salama and Marifer
26:25do not mean that these have been
26:27friends? But here I come to ruin the
26:29party for you. Well, some time before
26:32Mr. Doctor exposed the lie behind
26:34graphology and exposed Marifer Centeno,
26:37Salama claimed to be a very good friend
26:39of hers, even supporting her in
26:41controversies like the one she had with
26:44Yurka. Uh, I also want to make it clear
26:46that Marifer is a friend of mine and
26:48that I have a lot of affection for her,
26:51therefore, uh, her verbal communication
26:53, although I can see it quite
26:55objectively, well, there are surely
26:57going to be biases. There are surely
26:59going to be biases. Why do I love her?
27:00Because she is a friend. We
27:01have to clarify that. We have to
27:02clarify
27:03Marifer wanting to control everything,
27:06sitting in a position like, But my
27:08friend, Marifer is very pretty. If you
27:10were to meet Marifer in person, you
27:12would see that she is just too sweet.
27:15What can I tell you? She is too sweet.
27:17She is a great friend of mine. He loves
27:18her a lot. So he says," Why does she
27:19sell herself to someone who pays her
27:21like Gustavo Adolfo as a graphologist?
27:22"Graphology can't be sold. I mean, how
27:27do you sell it, man? I mean, if you do
27:30good graphology, it's really an attempt
27:34at science; it's interesting. It has
27:36several very interesting aspects
27:38because it's based on how we physically
27:41use our hands and how we write, and it
27:43has several interesting studies. It's
27:46not an exact science. Obviously,
27:47nonverbal communication isn't an exact
27:50science either. It's obviously very
27:53much based on the behavior of apes and
27:56many years of observing other people.
27:59However, his opinion about Marifer
28:01would change later. What a damn
28:04disappointment I've been carrying since
28:05yesterday. And for all those people who
28:09say," But you, but you said she was
28:12your friend. "" Ah, I have to be more
28:14careful about the stupid things I say,
28:16honestly, and who I get along with.
28:18Well, that is my responsibility and it
28:22is wise to accept when I screw up. I
28:24screwed up, I screwed up, I screwed up,
28:26I screwed up, I screwed up. This is the
28:28second time I screw up with an
28:30influencer. Exactly, just like Stefanie
28:31says, so be more careful next time. I
28:33totally agree. She tells your friend
28:35until you realize that she doesn't have
28:36the education to speak for her. Eh, I
28:40think you know what's going on and
28:42that's my problem. I'm one of those
28:45people who, until you prove me wrong,
28:47I'm going to trust you. And oh, man.
28:51Then they'll beat me up really good for
28:54being so confident, man. If it's true
28:56that I didn't do more research, then
28:58I'm responsible. I mean, she said she
29:00was a lawyer and I'm a lawyer, right?
29:02She said she knew how to read the
29:04nonverbal body language and I I
29:06believed, I mean, and well, it has good
29:08, I mean, suddenly it does have good
29:10approaches, I mean, it's not like you
29:12say, "Oh, no, everything is wrong." No,
29:15no, we shouldn't be generalists or
29:19reductionists, but, well, I mean, I
29:22screwed up and that's okay. There's
29:27nothing worse than someone who is
29:30intellectually dishonest. And for me,
29:34Marifer Centeno, not only as Dr. Mr.
29:37Doctor or Octavio, as his real name
29:40says, is not only a charlatan, but she
29:43also doesn't want to learn and the
29:46truth is that it's wrong, it's wrong
29:49that a person with so many followers,
29:52with so much influence over people who
29:55possibly have less education than her,
29:58would believe her and hurt themselves
30:02intellectually. It's so that there can
30:05be a new communication symbol. Oh, I
30:07hope that someday this woman has read
30:09something, because it seems like she
30:11only reads New Age stuff and it's
30:12unfortunate that she doesn't even dare
30:15to use her brain, right? Like saying, "
30:17Hey, why did I say this crap when I'm
30:18reading here that it's [ __ ]?" Or if
30:20she had a minimum of scientific
30:22thinking, she would say, "Could all
30:24this be true, dude? I'm going to do
30:26some research to see if anyone has
30:27studied this, at least." Yes, I
30:29apologize. I apologize for following
30:31the science, right? I apologize for not
30:33playing the game of misinformation. I
30:36apologize for not wanting to deceive
30:40people with nonsense that graphology
30:43works for personality. I apologize
30:46because at some point I did say that we
30:49were friends when, well, Nel, I mean,
30:52no, I mean, no, we were not
30:54acquaintances. Yes. And I thought he
30:58was a good person until that freaking
31:00Mr. Doctor opened all of our eyes and
31:02it's like, "Oh, my goodness, how
31:04freaking painful that was!""Mm. Look,
31:08I'd like to give you my opinion, but
31:10I'm going to save it for the end of
31:12this section. Sala mal, just like
31:14Marifer, takes advantage of having an
31:16ID to see controversies and give us his
31:18invaluable opinion, but not before
31:19putting the cover in the title. A
31:22psychologist reacts to this. Like his
31:25ex-friend, the value he has in his
31:27videos is simply telling us the obvious
31:29or what we all want to hear. And be
31:32careful not to point out that he says
31:34pure nonsense on the internet because
31:36he usually resorts to his best weapon.
31:38I'm
31:38not looking for pity from people and
31:39that's the problem. Reductionist people
31:41with anal neurological capacities
31:43because that's what they have, who
31:44don't understand what I do, right? And
31:46who criticize just for the sake of
31:47criticizing, okay, criticize me, I
31:48don't give a damn, don't keep me up at
31:50night.
31:50Salama, it's not at all professional to
31:53blame others for the stupid things you
31:55yourself say. But do you know what is
31:58still professional? Exactly.
32:00Invalidating the testimonies of a
32:01possible victim. because of your
32:03religious biases. And it turns out that
32:05Salama, I don't know for what reason,
32:07would enter into a conflict with Saúl
32:09Reina, a content creator who was
32:11married to Katrina, a Canadian woman
32:13with whom he would later have two
32:15children. However, years later Saul
32:17would divorce her due to religious
32:19differences, since Cat belonged to the
32:22Mormon religion. The first time I came
32:24to touch on this topic on my channel, I
32:26received few comments, but they are
32:28worth mentioning, telling me that no,
32:30that Saúl was the bad guy, because he
32:33took advantage of the fact that Cat was
32:35Canadian and only wanted to have
32:37citizenship. Others saying that he only
32:40had economic interests. Well, let
32:42everyone know that we are not talking
32:45about the controversy between Saú and
32:47Cat here. No sides are being taken here
32:50and I don't give a damn who of the two
32:53is right or whether it was right or
32:55wrong for them to get divorced. If this
32:58controversy is being brought up, it was
33:00because Salama, reacting to it, made
33:03comments that more than questionable,
33:05seem disgusting to me, especially
33:08coming from a supposed psychology
33:10professional. So let's leave it at that
33:12. Saul and Cat aside and let's pay
33:14attention to the next fragment that I'm
33:17going to play. How can you feel so
33:19guilty about something that is
33:21imaginary? Well, after that we get
33:22married and we have to go through a
33:24process of repentance in which I have
33:26to sit in a room with people of your
33:27religion and give them an explanation
33:29about my sexuality
33:31who are also of your religion. Don't
33:33forget. I love how you're using the
33:36bias of the enemy.
33:38How many relationships have you had?
33:39Who have you had them with? You have
33:40erotic thoughts, you watch pornography,
33:41you masturbate. Do I have to give a
33:43full explanation of my sexuality to
33:44these people that I don't know, because
33:46they represent an authority figure and
33:48because they are part of your community
33:50? And they are supposed to guide the
33:52community and, in that way, prevent
33:54people like you from leaking out and
33:56ruining a religion that also does good
33:58for other people. It's a way of if you
34:00tell the whole truth you are indebted
34:02to the religion and the religion is
34:04indebted to you and then you take care
34:06of yourselves. We all do it. All the
34:09Families, all tribes, all sects, all
34:12rituals in the world are based on
34:15honesty, where you tell your life as it
34:19is and I can support it. That's how we
34:22share our shame, our guilt. I tell you
34:24mine. And that pact of not screwing
34:26with each other becomes a religion,
34:28community, sect, tribe, whatever you
34:30want to call it. Okay, Salama, I'm
34:33going to slow you down a bit to explain
34:36the meaning of the word trust. You
34:38don't go around school or work
34:41confessing your private lives, your
34:43fantasies, your desires to the whole
34:46world. You don't tell them to people
34:49you trust, Salama. People who, over
34:52time, show you that they are capable of
34:54taking care of you and protecting you,
34:56not people who interrogate you to get
34:58information out of you. Interrogation
35:01that is not limited only to adults, but
35:03that is also carried out on minors as
35:05well. It includes
35:06children too. Those interviews begin at
35:08age 12. Young girls, they are being
35:10interrogated by men who are in their
35:12senior years.
35:13Now he wants to make it look like
35:15Gasophiles, right? They're like
35:19grandparents. Also, stop messing around
35:21with that, oh, how terrible, they're
35:22like grandparents, for God's sake. This
35:27guy is pretty biased, huh?
35:29And that's the Mormon policy to see if
35:31you're worthy to enter the temple or
35:32worthy to receive the priesthood, which
35:34is what they see as the power of God
35:35given to man on earth. So, that was my
35:37first mistake, a very big mistake and I
35:39regret very much having made that
35:40mistake. I never told her how I felt. I
35:42never told her," Catrina, I don't
35:43believe in this because it's pure
35:44fantasy. I feel humiliated that they're
35:46questioning her about our sexuality. I
35:47feel humiliated that you see it as
35:49something negative that we met and had
35:51relations. I mean, I feel horrible.
35:53There we go. The process took about a
35:54year. The forgiveness process. They put
35:56her in a locked room where she was
35:58interrogated by three elderly white men
36:00. Ah, black power at full blast. Three
36:06elderly white men. I mean, of course,
36:11he has a pretty perverted way of
36:12thinking, saying, "What did they do to
36:14her there?" When the reality is that
36:17they want to keep her healthy, they
36:19want to keep her from getting into crap
36:21like NOP and that kind of thing. Why is
36:24that bad? Because it's bad that there
36:27are elderly white men who want a woman
36:29or a man to be okay. I mean, if you
36:32told me, "They locked me up with three
36:35dark-skinned women to tell me why I
36:37didn't see NOP until I finally repented
36:39and I don't do it anymore." Oh, well,
36:42you're a man. It's like, "What the hell
36:46is this guy talking about? Also, he's a
36:48racist, dude."
36:49About the sexuality he had with me. She
36:51would come out of those visits,
36:52interrogations, torn apart, and these
36:54people would decide what punishment
36:56they were going to give her. The
36:57punishment. I mean, imagine a woman,
37:00religions are about subjugating women.
37:07Oh, great sage, oh great sage, explain
37:10it to us more, please. Tell us more.
37:14You're so smart, so wise. What a fool I
37:17am. My God. Hey, someone give her a
37:20book, at least one so she can learn to
37:21read, because what she's saying is
37:23really stupid. I mean, the level of
37:25stupidity and also the confidence with
37:27which she says things. My respects, my
37:30respects. That level of arrogance, not
37:33even Satan would dare. There's
37:35the example. Three old people are going
37:37to be a punishment. So,
37:38in addition to being old, I mean, we
37:40also have a problem with age. Well,
37:43the punishment they decided on was
37:44appropriate for her. It was something
37:46that in English is disfellowship, I
37:47think they call it excommunicado, in
37:49which you can go to church, but you
37:50can't have close friends or you can't
37:52take the sacraments, something like
37:54that. I mean, you can still attend, but
37:55you're not part of us until you repent.
37:58They don't
37:59kick you out of the community until you
38:00repent. They're even compassionate.
38:03Well, I can't believe that in less than
38:105 minutes you've validated so many ways
38:14of committing violence against women
38:17and minors. And the one who's talking
38:19nonsense is Saul. Imagine, Salama. You
38:22also need to validate this nonsense in
38:24your therapies that are not at all
38:26inflated in price. These interviews in
38:28the Mormon religion are known as
38:30dignity interviews and as Saul mentions
38:32, they are designed to determine what
38:34punishment an individual should receive
38:36for the great sin of desiring,
38:38exploring your body or simply having a
38:40fantasy. And as Saul said, these are
38:42done to minors without parental consent
38:44, without regulation or any way to
38:46monitor who is doing them and worst of
38:49all, behind closed doors. In fact,
38:51according to the Mormon Mental Health
38:53Association, there are suggestions for
38:55church leaders. Mind you, no orders, if
38:58you like, but basically the page
39:00correctly exposes the concerns that
39:02these types of interviews with minors
39:04bring, where the least important thing
39:06is that they take advantage of the
39:09minor at the time, Salama. But are you
39:11really that ignorant to understand the
39:14power that an adult has over a minor?
39:17Now add to that the fact that they know
39:19extremely private information about the
39:21minor that most likely not even their
39:24parents know. Sorry, I'm overdoing it
39:26with my stupid questions. In the end,
39:29you're the mental health professional,
39:31not me. I mean, you're so cool that in
39:33your 90-day program you're capable of
39:35changing the mental health of those who
39:37pay you. Listen to this very carefully,
39:38please, because it's for you. Today you
39:40have the partner that in the past you
39:42thought was all you could afford,
39:44emotionally, physically, financially,
39:46socially, whatever you want. That
39:48doesn't mean you have to tolerate them
39:50today. In the past, yes, whatever you
39:52want, but you don't live in the past,
39:54you live in your present. And if you
39:55really say, "Therapy doesn't work for
39:57me anymore, I've tried everything, I've
39:59watched all your videos, Alama, and I
40:01can't," what you need is a structured
40:03program. And that structured program is
40:04literally in the description of this
40:06channel where it says, "Click for the
40:0790-day program." Apart from that, I'm
40:09going to tell you. If you understand
40:12that the partner you have today is not
40:14the partner you could have in the past,
40:17today you can get something better and
40:19by understanding that today you deserve
40:21something better and that person did
40:24not evolve to do it, nothing. If you
40:26reasoned with this video and want to
40:28get out of stagnation, burnout, build
40:30healthy relationships, find your
40:32purpose and surround yourself with
40:34people who are on the same path as you,
40:36check out the link in my profile and
40:38follow me on my Instagram, where I will
40:40be sharing everything you need to
40:42achieve it daily.
40:43Wow, bro, even I believed it. Tell me,
40:46where did they lead you astray? This is
40:48where I want to pick up on the opinion
40:49I wanted to give you about Salama. And
40:51I'm sorry, but I'm not going to have
40:52any kind of filter here. You dedicate
40:54yourself to making the same garbage as
40:56Marifer Centeno, but the only reason
40:58why you're not in the abyss with her is
41:00because you decided to stop supporting
41:02her without any valid reason to become
41:04Mr. Doctor's faithful puppet. Look,
41:07you've known her for so many years and
41:09seen what she does and it was Mr.
41:10Doctor who came to open your eyes.
41:13Impressive. And don't get me wrong,
41:16Alama. I respect Mr. Doctor and I
41:18recognize the great work he's done
41:21exposing many charlatans. But more than
41:24respect, it seems like you're very
41:26afraid of him, brother, because deep
41:28down you know that you're no different
41:30from Marifer Centeno. I'm not going to
41:33dare to say that you're worse, but I do
41:35dare to say that you're cut from the
41:37same cloth. There's a comment that more
41:42than making me angry makes me feel
41:43sorry for the person who said it to me.
41:45You are an employee of Mr. Doctor,
41:47something that they tell me more than
41:49anything because of the support I gave
41:50him in the controversy against Marifer
41:52Centeno and because of the
41:53collaborations we have had on my
41:55channel. And it makes me sad because
41:57those who tell me this are pets and
41:59bootlickers of Marifer Centeno. The
42:01only people I am employed by are those
42:03who have donated to me in these months,
42:06those who have supported me with
42:07Patreon, those who have bought me
42:09components that are not cheap at all.
42:12Here I want to pause to thank my real
42:14bosses, being Alejandroid, Rex, Cucos,
42:17Carp, among others, who have helped me
42:19with donations both on this channel and
42:22on my gaming channel, where I dedicate
42:25myself to making live streams and, well
42:27, I basically live off the donations
42:30they give me. And no, I'm not at all
42:32embarrassed to thank these people who
42:34have literally bought components from
42:37my wishlist that I couldn't possibly
42:40afford on my own, giving me a better
42:42opportunity and quality in my work that
42:44you may not see reflected on the screen
42:46or in this video. But, seriously, I
42:48swear, the difference between working
42:51in a more comfortable chair is
42:53incomparable, with a PC that doesn't
42:55crash, that works 100%, that doesn't
42:57give me lag, that doesn't turn off
43:00every time or that doesn't run out of
43:02power every time the power goes out
43:04thanks to the no-break, thanks to the
43:07RAM, the new processor, and basically
43:09everything they've given me to be able
43:12to work much better. I appreciate Mr.
43:14Doctor, but I wish he were my boss.
43:17These little pets, in their great need
43:20to put me in their cage, forget that
43:22I'm quite capable of pointing out both
43:24the good things about a creator I
43:26appreciate and the bad things they do.
43:29Between January and February 2026, I
43:31believe the worst recent controversy
43:34involving Mr. Doctor was born. A
43:36controversy that arose thanks to Dross
43:39publishing a video called The Broken
43:42Monster, where he recounts the alleged
43:44experience of a psychiatric patient,
43:47who, in short, mentioned having been
43:49experimented on, abused, mistreated,
43:51and even tortured by a clinic. The
43:54clinic would be recognized thanks to
43:56the capture of a leaked prescription in
43:58the same video, a prescription where,
44:00in addition to learning about the
44:02clinic, we would learn the name of this
44:05psychiatrist, Dr. Abigail Castro. Here
44:08we have to be fair, since throughout
44:10the entire video of The Broken Monster,
44:12things are stated that could never be
44:14proven and that the victim never
44:16decided to report, despite having the
44:18legal support provided by Dross himself
44:20. This automatically means that it is
44:23not at all false. Let's remember that a
44:25psychiatric patient is someone
44:27vulnerable, someone who is obviously
44:29going to choose their mental health
44:31over public judgment. Yes, there is a
44:33possibility that she is lying or that
44:36the facts have been exaggerated, but
44:38neither you nor I are judges to rule
44:40that she is lying or that the clinic
44:42did commit everything it is being
44:45accused of. Clearly, this controversy
44:47did not advance so much because of
44:48something unproven. It turns out that
44:50in the same prescriptions, Dora Abigail
44:53claimed to be a child psychiatrist with
44:55an ID number. Child psychiatry is a
44:57subspecialty of psychiatry that focuses
45:00on the mental care of minors and since
45:02it is a subspecialty, consultations and
45:04treatments are not cheap at all. Here
45:06is the strange thing. That ID number
45:09belongs to her name, yes, but not to
45:11her subspecialty as a child
45:14psychiatrist, but rather to her degree
45:16as a surgeon. But why not simply put
45:19the ID number that corresponds to her
45:22subspecialty? Very simple, because such
45:25a ID does not even exist. Dr. Abigail
45:29should have her license as a surgeon,
45:32psychiatrist, and child psychiatrist.
45:36Instead, she only has the first one,
45:38which led to her being publicly accused
45:40of usurpation of functions, an
45:42accusation that Mr. Doctor initially
45:44tried to deny by saying that she does
45:46have the license, therefore, the crime
45:49does not constitute one. But if we look
45:51at the law that applies to the doctor,
45:54which is the regulatory law of article
45:56five of the constitution, its article
45:5825 establishes that in order to
46:00practice any profession, it is
46:02necessary to have a legally issued and
46:05duly registered license. Okay, she has
46:07a legally issued license, but what does
46:10registered mean? According to article 3
46:13of the same law, the license must be
46:15obtained after registering that license
46:17. In other words, and very simply,
46:19without this license, your license is
46:21not duly registered and, without it
46:23being registered, you would not be able
46:25to practice this profession. Therefore,
46:27anyone who has paid fees for child
46:29psychiatry to this doctor is certainly
46:31able to report her and request a full
46:33reimbursement of those costs. That is,
46:36as long as you are within the time
46:37frame established to be able to file
46:39your complaint. But come on, here we
46:41are only talking about an
46:42administrative offense for simply not
46:45having the ID. But what really happens
46:47with usurpation? It is true that Mr.
46:50Doctor presents a degree as a child
46:52psychiatrist for Dr. Abigail, but some
46:54of you may have seen the date of issue.
46:57For this, it is important to remember
46:59that in an attempt to silence Dross,
47:02she sent him an email where, in
47:04addition to recognizing the alleged
47:06patient and requesting a large amount
47:08of money to avoid starting a legal
47:10lawsuit, she also mentioned that Dr.
47:12Abigail stopped treating her in 2019.
47:15In other words, regardless of how long
47:17this treatment lasted, she had been
47:19practicing as a child psychiatrist for
47:21several years before even having the
47:24degree. And Article 250 of the Criminal
47:26Code is quite clear in its description
47:29of usurpation of functions, so it
47:31matters very little whether the doctor
47:33currently holds such a title. However,
47:36many paid more attention to her and
47:38left her husband aside, who for me is
47:41the worst case. This is the
47:42psychiatrist Oscar, who, like Abigail,
47:45decided to go with Mr. Doctor to be
47:47able to defend himself from all the
47:49accusations, since he has been the
47:51director of the same clinic since 2013.
47:53And yes, you guessed it. Like his wife,
47:56he also does not have his ID. He has
47:58had his advanced specialty in liaison
48:01psychiatry since 2012, a diploma which
48:03he presented in the same podcast.
48:05However, there is a document that, at
48:07least to me, caught my attention much
48:09more. His title as a psychiatrist,
48:12which was issued on September 18, 2025,
48:15has been claiming to be a psychiatrist
48:18for more than a decade without even
48:21having the title. What worries me the
48:24most is the calmness with which he
48:26admits how he was able to enter a
48:28highly specialized field of liaison
48:30psychiatry, given that the most
48:32important requirement is to have a
48:35previous degree in psychiatry. Yes, yes
48:37, yes, Mr. Doctor. How great that they
48:39have degrees and everything, and that
48:41there is...But why don't they have IDs?
48:43You are, Mr. Doctor, the first one to
48:44demand IDs. Why doesn't Dr. Abigail
48:48have her ID in psychiatry or child
48:51psychiatry? Tell us what happened,
48:54because you finished psychiatry in 2013
48:56, child psychiatry in 2015. Why not?
49:00What was happening in those years? Why
49:01not? Why UNAM or why didn't you apply?
49:04What happened? Well, a series of
49:07personal, circumstantial, and happy
49:10factors, but at the same time, they
49:13influenced you to leave a procedure or
49:16not give importance to a procedure like
49:19this one. Well, in the psychiatry
49:22residency I met my current husband, I
49:25am a mother for the first time from R2
49:28to R3. Well, now that I see it without
49:32his support and being foreign people
49:36with a high-load, high-demand career
49:39and a baby, well, other things were
49:43prioritized. So it was work, motherhood
49:47, doing what was best to do on a
49:50day-to-day basis and well, yes, I mean,
49:53the administrative procedures were not
49:56a priority, until the Marilyn Coat
49:59thing came out.
50:00Yeah. It was exactly a year ago,
50:02because look, her title of Paido
50:03Psychiatrist will appear here again.
50:06Let's zoom in on the one where it says
50:08Paido Psychiatrist, and we also zoom in
50:10on the section where it says that she
50:12obtained it in August 2025; If I
50:14remember correctly, it's August 8,
50:152025. If not, we'll get it right now,
50:18but it'll be available in August 2025.
50:20Why spend 10 years getting a psychiatry
50:22internship? Perhaps you do not know, or
50:24maybe you are already aware, but as
50:25residents, the reality is that the
50:27salary we receive is extremely low. I
50:29know that for many, 10,000 pesos a
50:31month, 11,000 may be quite a lot and
50:33more than the average salary. But for a
50:36person who works shifts every third day
50:38, who doesn't sleep for 36 hours, plus
50:41she's a mother and she's an outsider,
50:44and you may not know, that's why it's
50:46so important to study to value yourself
50:49; but the qualifications, the
50:51procedures for getting the ID, are
50:53expensive, and sometimes it's: either I
50:56pay the rent, which in Tlalpan is very
50:59expensive, or I pay my ID and...And I
51:03guess that's what happened. Yes, partly
51:08that and partly, I'm telling you, I'm
51:11done, they gave me my stuff, I'm now a
51:14psychiatrist and, well, how do you do
51:17the paperwork at UNAM or what's next?
51:20That was left hanging, I didn't follow
51:24up on it at the time,
51:25because it's also worth noting that you
51:27say, "Oh, because it wasn't done, when
51:29are we going to go if they're barely
51:31letting us leave the hospital later." I
51:33mean, I remember when I had to go get
51:35my credentials at UNAM, I mean, they
51:37don't let you leave. Then, uh, you
51:39enter the subspecialty, I mean, this is
51:41very close, I mean, you finish the
51:42specialty in February, mid-February and
51:44then you're entering the subspecialty.
51:46I mean, one of those, as you've heard,
51:48she's like me when I was 16, I entered
51:50when I was 17, I mean, she entered when
51:51I was 16, so one after another, after
51:53another, after another, after another,
51:54and then one after another. And in your
51:56case, what happens? Because maybe
51:57they'll say, well, but because she was
51:59doing her job and because she had
52:00several things to do. But in your case,
52:02what happens? Why isn't there a
52:03psychiatrist's license? Hey, look, I'll
52:06file the paperwork at the right time.
52:09Hey, they do the...the director of the
52:12SAP at that time, he's already passed
52:14away, Dr. Campillo, he took a course.
52:17The grades were already there,
52:18everything was already there; he took a
52:21course, they had even already accepted
52:23me in the link, he took a course in the
52:25last month on quality in
52:26hospitalization or quality in...these
52:28are administrative procedures, which we
52:30doctors saw a lot of. He does it online
52:33at that time. Hey, I take the exam, I
52:35send it in, and they call me and tell
52:38me that I didn't do it, that I didn't
52:40show up.
52:41I go and try to fix this. I was outside
52:45his office for about 6 or 7 hours and
52:49apparently I was caught up in, let's
52:52say, an ego war between the directors
52:56and the SAP, which at that time was...
52:59The SAP is the Mexican Psychiatric
53:01Association, it's
53:01not psychiatric care services. It's the
53:04federal part.
53:06I arrive there and he says to me, why
53:09were there two graduations that were
53:11held at the hospital, the one for the
53:14director and also the one for him,
53:16specifically speaking. And he tells me
53:20something, a phrase that I remember
53:22very well, is: "You're not in your own
53:24world here, and you're not going to
53:26please yourself, and you're not going
53:28to be a subspecialty." The assistant
53:31director, Dr. Ansaldo, helps me with
53:33this and enters the grades beforehand.
53:35But she tells me, "We can't give you
53:37anything." But that allowed me to
53:39enroll in liaison psychiatry and have
53:41the liaison psychiatry degree on time
53:43and with a timely qualification.
53:46If this is not negligence, I don't know
53:48what else to call it. We are talking
53:51about the director of a psychiatric
53:53clinic, who has given lectures at
53:55universities and hospitals, who has
53:58pretended to be such based solely on a
54:00diploma. It is exactly like Paola
54:03Almontes selling her personalized
54:05investment advice, but with her UNAM
54:07diploma instead of her AIP
54:08certification, figure 3. Just add to
54:10that that we are not only talking about
54:12fairs, but also about a patient's
54:14mental health. Ironically, this case is
54:17a perfect reflection of the case of
54:19Marily Lyn Coat, a supposed
54:21psychiatrist who was exposed by Mr.
54:23Doctor himself for not having her
54:26license or degree. In fact, his video
54:28touches on legal assumptions that
54:30ironically also clash with the case of
54:32Abigail and her husband Oscar, which
54:35would obviously work very much against
54:37Mr. Doctor and which, I dare say, left
54:39a very important mark on his channel.
54:41In the end, I never saw if there was an
54:43apology from him. I genuinely hope so,
54:45because when we fall into an
54:47inconsistency as content creators,
54:49apart from seeing an apology to the
54:52supposed victims, we also owe an
54:54apology to our followers, to the people
54:56who give us that vote of confidence. As
54:59content creators, we sometimes forget
55:01that we have a great responsibility for
55:04what we say and what we do. And by not
55:07stopping to think about the damage we
55:10can cause with our words, with our
55:12actions, we can end up harming those we
55:15are supposed to protect. I truly hope
55:18you enjoyed this video and here I am
55:20going to leave you another one that I
55:22guarantee you will like. That's all
55:25from me and I say goodbye. My name is
55:28Ortriac and you already know it, my
55:31[ __ ] friends, that I love you a lot.
55:36Take care.

About this transcript

This page contains the full transcript of YouTube transcript (d_f3hJCRsAc) , generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 9,617 words across 1,454 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.

What you can do with it

Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to choose a caption track available on the video.

Free YouTube transcript tool

YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, caption language selection, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.