YT YouTube2Text

YouTube2Text → Transcripts → Curso GRATIS de Derechos de Petición para GANAR un EMPLEO en los Concursos de Mérito

Curso GRATIS de Derechos de Petición para GANAR un EMPLEO en los Concursos de Mérito — Transcript

by Misión Mérito · 14,739 words · 2,244 segments · language en · Watch on YouTube

Open in transcriber Summarize with AI Download SRT/VTT

Full transcript

0:03The topic we are going to see today is
0:05fundamental for preparing for
0:07merit-based competitions, and it is
0:08that in many competitions, in many
0:10exams, they could ask us questions such
0:12as, for example, who can file a right
0:14of petition? Or, "What happens if a
0:17petition is disrespectful? Should it be
0:20accepted? Should it be rejected? What
0:22happens if I don't have, for example, a
0:24lawyer to be able to file my right of
0:26petition? These questions, perhaps a
0:29bit more complex using the situational
0:31judgment methodology, could appear on
0:33your exam. Not directly asking you
0:37perhaps specific legal issues, but for
0:39you to implement the situational
0:41judgment methodology to answer these
0:43questions. The subject of rights of
0:47petition is a very important topic in
0:49all competitions. It is almost
0:52guaranteed that they will ask you about
0:53this topic, so it is very important
0:55that you know it. In my experience, I
1:00have taken more than 10 exams and in
1:01almost all of them they have asked me
1:03about this topic, so it is very
1:05important, not only at the professional
1:07level, but also at the assistant and
1:09technical levels; this topic is asked
1:11at practically all levels. So, in
1:16today's video, we are going to look at
1:18the most important information that you
1:20need to know about this topic. I
1:25welcome the people who are connected at
1:27this moment, the people who are joining
1:28. We are going to look at the topic of
1:34rights of petition, which is a very,
1:36very important topic in all tests in
1:38general. So, well, allow me a moment
1:45and we are going to start, I think in a
1:47minute to wait for the other people who
1:49wish to participate in today's live
1:50stream to connect. So, well, welcome to
1:57everyone who is connected at this
1:59moment. We are going to wait perhaps
2:03one more minute for people to finish
2:05connecting and then we will begin. As I
2:11mentioned, this topic I would say is
2:13one of the most important, perhaps it
2:15is not the only one we should study;
2:17clearly, the idea is that in these
2:19sessions we are going to study all
2:20these topics to prepare for the
2:22upcoming competitions. We have the
2:29registry competition, district 6
2:30competition, territorial 11 competition
2:33, I think territorial 10 as well, the
2:35Comptroller's Office, and in all of
2:37them they will practically ask us this,
2:39of course, it depends a bit on the
2:41level we are applying for. Well, so we
2:47are going to start, we are going to
2:49start with the topic of rights of
2:51petition. Uh uh well, let's get started
2:57now, I think it's already 7:05, we
3:01already have a good number of people
3:02connected, so we can start. Chapter 1
3:09of the Law on Rights of Petition, which
3:12is Law 1755 of 2015, we must keep in
3:15mind that Law 1755 has only two
3:20articles. Sometimes, perhaps mistakenly
3:24, we might say Article 13 of Law 1755,
3:27when in reality this law only has two
3:29articles. The first one modifies Law
3:331437 of 2011 and the second one is
3:35regarding its entry into force. But
3:41well, if you hear someone talking
3:43perhaps about Article 13 or Article 14
3:45of Law 1755, what they actually mean is
3:48that they are referring to Law 1437 of
3:502011. Now we are going to talk about
3:56this first chapter, which is the right
3:58of petition before authorities. What
4:01are those general rules that we must
4:03keep in mind? What will you answer if
4:07on your exam they ask you, for example,
4:09is legal representation required to
4:11file a right of petition? Or if they
4:14ask you if minors can file a right of
4:16petition by themselves or if they must
4:17be accompanied by an adult? What would
4:20you answer? Well, the law speaks to us
4:23precisely about the object and
4:25modalities of the right of petition
4:27before authorities. Basically, here
4:32they are telling us that every person,
4:34yes, every person, has the right to
4:36present respectful petitions to the
4:37authorities, to the entities, in the
4:39terms indicated in the law, which we
4:41will see shortly, and it can be for
4:43reasons of general interest or reasons
4:45of private interest. There is a doubt
4:52that is perhaps frequent, and it is if
4:54I am going to make use of the right of
4:55petition, uh, for example, in a virtual
4:57channel. Let's take the example of"
5:01Bogotá te escucha "or an entity, for
5:03example, the CNSC, which has its PQRSD
5:06channel. Do I have to invoke the right
5:09of petition, the article; that is, do I
5:11have to invoke Article 23 of the
5:13Political Constitution? And well no, if
5:17you file a PQR, you don't have to
5:18indicate that, making use of my
5:20fundamental rights, Article 23 of the
5:22Political Constitution; rather, just by
5:24the fact of you filing the petition, it
5:26is understood that you are making use
5:28of that right without it being
5:30necessary to invoke it. So, through a
5:35right of petition, you can request
5:36different things. For example, to have
5:39a right recognized. You can request an
5:43entity's intervention, the provision of
5:45a service, request information, or make
5:47an inquiry. Well, you can request many
5:50different things. One of them, for
5:55example, is requesting copies of
5:57documents, and one of the most common
5:59is the PQRSD, which would be petitions,
6:01inquiries, complaints, reports, and
6:04claims. Well, and also the matter of
6:08filing appeals. You can request
6:13different things through a right of
6:15petition, and normally when you make a
6:16petition, whether through Bogotá Te
6:18Escucha or the CNSC, you see that there
6:20are different categories under which
6:22you can classify your petition. Now,
6:31this is likely a topic we already
6:33handle very well, which is important;
6:35but for those who may not know: the
6:37right of petition is completely free;
6:39you don't have to pay anything to file
6:41one, and very importantly, it can be
6:43done without any need for
6:44representation, such as through a
6:46lawyer. Or also, and this was a
6:56question that came up—that I got in a
6:57competition—it can be submitted
6:59without needing to be represented by an
7:01adult when it concerns minors, as long
7:03as it relates to entities dedicated to
7:05their protection or education. But
7:14let's keep in mind, a minor does not
7:16need, provided it concerns one of these
7:18entities, any kind of accompaniment or
7:19any kind of representation through an
7:21adult. A minor is also a citizen and
7:27can also file a right of petition. Well
7:36, in written tests, they might ask you,
7:38for example, how many days you have to
7:40respond to a petition, or how many days
7:42you have to answer a request for
7:44information or an inquiry. It is also
7:49important to know, are they business
7:50days or calendar days? Or what happens,
7:53for example, if for some reason you
7:55cannot provide a response to a petition
7:57within the terms established by law?
8:02Well, regarding this topic, the law
8:04tells us about the terms to respond to
8:06the different types of petitions, which
8:08are basically three. On one hand, and
8:13this is like the general rule, every
8:15petition must be resolved within 15,
8:17yes, within the 15 days following its
8:19receipt. Now, the question would be,
8:23are they business days or calendar days
8:25? Well, rights of petition are always
8:29answered in business days, okay?
8:31Calendar days are not taken into
8:33account; instead, they are business
8:35days. Well, there are some exceptions,
8:38which are two. On one hand, requests
8:43for documents and information that must
8:45be resolved within the 10 business days
8:47following their receipt. That is to say
8:51, it is 5 days less than a standard
8:53petition, let's say. And there is
9:00something special here: if a response
9:01is not given to the petitioner within
9:03those 10 days, it is understood that
9:05the request they filed has been
9:06accepted, and the entity can no longer
9:08refuse to provide the requested
9:10documents. So, those documents must be
9:17delivered within the 3 business days
9:19following the expiration of that
9:20deadline. And the other exception is
9:27for petitions when a consultation is
9:29raised to authorities regarding matters
9:30under their charge. These petitions, as
9:37they are also special, must be answered
9:39within 30 business days following their
9:41receipt. Now, what happens if, for some
9:47reason, the entity cannot respond to
9:49that petition within the terms of the
9:51law? For example, if it is a request
9:56for information, the entity may be 7 or
9:588 days in and sees that it will not be
10:00able to respond within the 10 days. So,
10:04what should be done in those cases?
10:07Well, those must be exceptional cases,
10:10yes? It should not be the norm. And in
10:15these cases, which could be an exam
10:17question, what must be done is, before
10:19the deadline expires—remembering that
10:21it depends on the modality that was
10:23used, it could be 15 days, it could be
10:2510, or it could be 30 days. Before that
10:32deadline expires, the entity must
10:33inform the petitioner why they will not
10:35be able to provide a response. I don't
10:40know, it could be that the internet
10:42went out, or maybe some natural
10:44disaster; I mean, these can be
10:45exceptional things that are clearly out
10:47of the entity's control. So, that
10:51situation must be reported to the
10:53petitioner, and they must be told why
10:55and when the response will be provided.
11:00It is important to keep in mind that
11:02the deadline indicated cannot be double
11:04the one initially established. So, if
11:08it is a request for information that
11:10has 10 business days, it cannot exceed
11:1220 business days, that is, another 10
11:14business days. Well, now on your exam,
11:21they might ask you how a petition can
11:23be filed, or for example, what happens
11:25if the petitioner submits an incomplete
11:27petition? The law speaks to the
11:35presentation and filing of petitions
11:36and tells us there are different ways
11:38in which they can be submitted. For
11:46example, petitions can be presented
11:47verbally, and a written record of it
11:49must be kept, or a receipt; or they can
11:51also be submitted in writing and
11:53through any means suitable for
11:54communication or data transfer. Here we
12:02can see, for example, I believe the
12:03most popular method for submitting
12:05petitions is the virtual channel. We
12:13see that, for instance, there are
12:15increasingly popular platforms like"
12:17Bogotá Escucha, "where the different
12:19District entities are centralized; it
12:21is a very good system for centralizing
12:23and assigning, by jurisdiction, to the
12:25different secretariats or the mayor's
12:27office, well, to the District entities.
12:36Well, it is also important to address
12:38the topic of incomplete petitions. For
12:43example, if there is a petition being
12:45filed, but it does not have all the
12:47documents that are requested, let's say
12:49, by law. Then, when that petition is
12:54received, the petitioner must be told
12:56which documents are missing. But of
13:02course, the entity cannot refuse to
13:04receive a petition even if it is
13:05incomplete. So, in the event that the
13:12petitioner insists on filing that
13:13petition, the entity must file it,
13:15while, of course, leaving a record of
13:17which requirements or documents are
13:19missing. Uh, in the event that, for
13:30example, the petition is verbal, if the
13:32petitioner requests proof that they
13:34submitted that petition...because, of
13:36course, when you present a verbal
13:37petition, there isn't really a piece of
13:39evidence left; but if the petitioner
13:41requests that proof of submission, then
13:43that evidence, that receipt which is
13:45requested, must be issued. Well, it is
14:02important to keep in mind that,
14:04although verbal and written petitions
14:06can be submitted, entities can also
14:07require that some petitions be
14:09presented in writing, and, well,
14:10entities can also offer some forms or
14:12templates to make it easier for the
14:14petitioner to fill them out or submit
14:16that petition. I don't know if you have
14:25ever submitted one. I, for example,
14:28once filed a petition at Alcosto, and
14:30they have a document there that you can
14:32fill out. You can say," Well, I'll put
14:35my name, explain what the case was, and
14:37state what I am requesting. "It's a
14:41structured document; the idea is to
14:43make it easier for the petitioner to
14:45submit that request. What is important
14:48to keep in mind here? Even if the form
14:57or that format doesn't have a specific
14:59place to add attachments or anything
15:01like that, it does not prevent the
15:02petitioner from attaching other items,
15:04such as evidence or documentation they
15:06believe will support their petition. So
15:17, and also at the time of delivery,
15:19let's use the Alcosto example again.
15:26You submit that petition, but you don't
15:28know if they will follow up on it, or
15:30if it is being saved in some electronic
15:32system. So, what can you do? You can
15:37ask for, you can request a copy. Ready?
15:41You can request a copy of the petition
15:43you are submitting with a note
15:44indicating the date and time of filing.
15:48It usually also has a tracking number.
15:53And also how many attachments are
15:55included, because otherwise, they could
15:57claim that you only submitted a single
15:59page with no attachments. So, that copy
16:06should also have the date, the time,
16:08perhaps the tracking number, and how
16:10many attachments the document has, and
16:12the copy they give you has the same
16:14legal value as the original petition
16:16you delivered. And, well, it must be
16:24issued at no cost; it is usually a bit
16:26simpler with public entities because
16:28they give it to you easily. Perhaps
16:31with private entities it is a bit more
16:33complicated, and sometimes you have to
16:35ask for it, you have to request that
16:37copy. Well, it's important that in case
16:42you file or submit a petition through
16:50some data transfer method, for instance
16:52, let's use the example of the CNSC
16:54website, the date and time of filing
16:56will be recorded. The date and time of
17:02filing would be the moment at which you
17:04send that petition. And it is also
17:11important to keep in mind or highlight
17:13that no entity or authority can refuse
17:15to receive and file requests that are
17:17respectful, okay? That they are
17:22respectful. That is sort of the
17:24requirement. Well, uh well, that would
17:32be like the the first part. Uh, these
17:34are very general topics regarding the
17:36rights of petition. Let's remember that
17:41the subject of rights of petition is
17:43not something that will only serve me
17:45for one exam, for example: only for the
17:47Registrar's Office, only for the
17:49Comptroller's Office, only for the
17:51Prosecutor's Office; rather, it is an
17:53integral topic that will serve us for
17:55practically all the exams we take and,
17:57once we become public servants, it will
17:59serve us in our day-to-day work to know
18:01, for example, the terms, the
18:02requirements, well, and other
18:04information about this law. Um let's
18:14let's continue. So, we are going to
18:18look at an important topic regarding
18:19rights of petition that will surely
18:21help you answer your exam, which is the
18:23requirements and the process of the
18:24right of petition. Now, what would you
18:30answer on your exam if they were to ask
18:32you, for example, what information must
18:34a petition contain in order to be valid
18:36? Or if they give you a case where a
18:40citizen submits a right of petition
18:42with certain information, but it is
18:43missing, I don't know, maybe the email,
18:45maybe the cell phone, maybe the ID
18:47number, the name. Would that right of
18:51petition be valid? Well, the law speaks
18:57to us precisely about the content of
18:58petitions and tells us that every
19:00petition must contain, at least
19:02initially, which entity that petition
19:04is directed to. For example, to the
19:09Registrar's Office, for example, to the
19:11Prosecutor's Office, to the CNSC, to
19:14which entity do I direct my request. It
19:20must also include the full names and
19:22surnames of the applicant or their
19:23attorney, if applicable, along with the
19:25identity document number and, very
19:27importantly, the address where that
19:29correspondence will be received.
19:35Generally, and what I do, the
19:37recommendation I also give is to add
19:39the email or include the email. Why?
19:43Because, for example, if you sometimes
19:45file a right of petition, uh if you
19:47also file a petition for protection,
19:49for example, uh and you put your
19:50physical address, what happens? That
19:56sometimes the entities are not very
19:58careful with that information and, for
19:59example, by law, sometimes the judge
20:01orders them to publish that information
20:03so that interested parties can act or
20:05can attach themselves to that petition.
20:10So, what happens? that the moment you
20:14provide your address, if that
20:15information is published, well,
20:17practically all your information ends
20:19up, uh, well, in the cloud, and
20:21practically anyone could access it.
20:25They can get your ID number, your full
20:27name, your address, uh, your phone
20:29number, your email; all the information
20:31you put there, well, be very careful
20:33because sometimes entities are not very
20:35careful with that issue. Of course, you
20:39can request, uh, uh—as a matter of
20:41fact, it happened to me once—I filed
20:43a petition and the CNSC published the
20:46petition with, well, a bunch of my
20:47personal information. So I asked the
20:52CNSC to remove that information because
20:54it was my private information and, well
20:56, in the end they did, they took the
20:58petition off the website, but in that
21:00lapse, you don't know who might see all
21:02that information and for what purposes
21:04they might use it. So, that is why I
21:10highly recommend that instead of
21:12putting your physical address, you put
21:13your electronic address, that is, your
21:15email, since this is a valid means for
21:17you to receive the response to your
21:19request or your petition. Uh, well, uh,
21:27also another another item, another
21:29another uh important characteristic
21:31that petitions must have is the object,
21:33that is, what are you asking for with
21:35your petition? This, well, is very
21:42important because basically, uh, this
21:44is the core of the petition. It is,
21:46what are you filing this petition for?
21:49Do you want them to help you with, I
21:50don't know, a procedure? Do you want
21:52them to help you, uh, perhaps with, I
21:54don't know, a medicine from a health
21:56provider? Do you think a right is
21:59perhaps being violated or that they are
22:01not acting in a proper manner? I mean,
22:04what do you want to achieve with your
22:06petition? That would be the object, and
22:08it's very important that it be there,
22:10because if a petition has no object,
22:12well, there is no way to respond to it.
22:14I mean, what are you going to, what are
22:15you going to answer if they aren't
22:17asking you anything? If they aren't
22:18requesting anything, there is no way to
22:20respond to it. That is why the object
22:22is very, very important. Then, the
22:25reasons on which the petition is based.
22:27This, well, although it is in the law.
22:29Hm. Yes. Well, it should it should have
22:34a justification for why you are filing
22:36that petition, but well, I don't know
22:38to what extent this would be, uh. Well,
22:44it's within the law, but I consider
22:46that if you are asking for something,
22:47regardless of what your reasoning is,
22:49well, your request should be taken into
22:51account. But anyway, the law indicates
22:55that you must have the reasons upon
22:57which you base your petition. On the
23:01other hand, there must be a list of the
23:02documents you wish to present to
23:04initiate the process, which would be
23:06the attachments. You can include, I
23:08don’t know, an attachment. Sometimes
23:11some procedures ask for your ID,
23:13sometimes they ask for, I don't know, a
23:15registration, some type of certificate,
23:17so you can attach that to your petition
23:20. And well, finally the signature when,
23:25when it is the case, because we know
23:27that, for example, through virtual
23:29means, well, there is no need to put
23:31your signature, as you can perhaps
23:32sometimes create your account. For
23:37example, I have an account on the"
23:38Bogotá te escucha "page; in others,
23:40you simply put your name, your details,
23:43your email, and the answers reach your
23:45email in the end. So, the signature is
23:48not always necessary. Perhaps when you
23:51submit it in physical form, yes, but
23:53through digital means, it is not
23:54mandatory. Well, for that petition that
24:03you, that you submit to the entity, the
24:05company, or wherever, the authority has
24:07the obligation to examine this petition
24:09comprehensively and, super important,
24:11in no case can they dismiss that
24:13petition or say it is incomplete due to
24:15a lack of requirements or missing
24:16documents that are not within the
24:18current legal framework or, very
24:20importantly, that are not necessary. In
24:27other words, they cannot tell you or
24:28reject your petition because you didn't
24:30provide a document that is useless,
24:32that has nothing to do with the
24:33petition. So, it is important to keep
24:36that in mind. And also in the case,
24:40let’s remember, perhaps the anti-red
24:41tape law, that you cannot be asked for
24:43information that is already held in the
24:45entity’s files. So, they cannot deny
24:49a petition because you were missing a
24:51document that the entity already has.
24:54Got it? It's important; it might come
24:57up in some document or in some exam. Eh
25:00, so, let's keep that in mind. And also
25:06, a bit in line with the above, you
25:08cannot reject the petition by arguing
25:10that it is poorly grounded or
25:11incomplete. Got it? Basically, it is
25:17very, very complicated to reject a
25:19petition. Practically, there is only
25:22one case that we will see later, for
25:24which a petition can be rejected, but
25:26otherwise it is very, very difficult
25:28and I would say that in 95 to 98%of
25:30cases, the petition must always be
25:32received. Now, on your exam, they might
25:37ask you, what happens if there is an
25:39incomplete petition? What happens if
25:41that petition is missing, for example,
25:43the object? If we don't know what the
25:47petitioner is asking for, they might
25:49also ask you in what cases these
25:50petitions can be archived. Could it be
25:54that a petition can be archived if it
25:55is incomplete? If we don't know what
25:58the petitioner is asking, can we simply
25:59archive it? Well, the law speaks
26:03precisely about the subject of
26:04incomplete petitions and tacit
26:06withdrawal. Here they are telling us
26:16that when the entity, when the entity
26:18sees that a petition that has already
26:20been filed is incomplete, or that the
26:22applicant or petitioner must perhaps
26:23carry out a procedure, yes, an
26:25additional procedure that is necessary
26:27to respond to that petition, then they
26:29will be required; that is, that
26:30applicant will be informed. The entity
26:39must communicate with that petitioner.
26:43That is what requiring means, it will
26:45be required for, well, and for this
26:47there are 10 days, okay? I mean, the
26:51entity here really has to be very
26:53attentive, and 10 days is a
26:54considerable amount of time. Let's
26:57remember: these are business days,
26:59because if an entity hasn't responded
27:01to, or hasn't reviewed a petition in 10
27:03days, then it's in bad shape, because
27:0510 days can be, for example, or is the
27:07deadline for an information request. So
27:11, an entity should not leave a petition
27:13for 10 days without looking at what it
27:15is about, because it could be an
27:16information request and it would
27:18already be past the deadline. So,
27:23within the 10 days following the filing
27:25date, the petitioner will be required
27:27to complete their request within a
27:29period of one month, okay? Or within a
27:34maximum term of one month. And, well,
27:42let's say the entity had 10 days to
27:44communicate with the petitioner and on
27:46day 7, or better yet on day 5, it sent
27:48that communication to request that the
27:50petitioner complete it, and for example
27:52, five or 10 days later the petitioner
27:54sends the document or complements their
27:56petition. So, what happens? Starting
28:06the day after the petitioner provides
28:08the documents or gives the missing
28:09information, the term to resolve the
28:11petition is reactivated. For example,
28:17if the entity had 10 days, it was an
28:19information request and on day 5 it
28:21required the petitioner. When the
28:28petitioner replies, then the entity
28:29will have the following 5 days to
28:31finish responding to the petition. Well
28:40, that would be in the case where the
28:41petitioner responds to or supplements
28:43their petition. But, what happens if
28:47suddenly the 30 days pass, that month
28:49goes by, and the petitioner does not
28:51provide the information, does not
28:53provide the missing documents? What is
28:56done in that case? In that case, if the
29:00petitioner definitely did not
29:02communicate, even though the entity
29:04requested it, then it is understood
29:05that they withdrew their request and
29:14unless, yes, I mean, they withdrew the
29:16request, unless before the deadline
29:18expires, unless before those 30 days
29:20pass, an extension is requested which
29:22can be for a period of up to 30 days;
29:24but if they definitely do not
29:25communicate, then the entity can decree
29:27the withdrawal and the filing of the
29:29case. Ready? How is this done? It is
29:36done through a reasoned administrative
29:37act that must be notified personally to
29:43the petitioner and, well, against which
29:45an appeal for reconsideration may be
29:47filed, but let's also keep in mind that
29:49a right of petition is relatively easy,
29:51it is relatively easy to carry out. So,
29:57if that petition is filed away, the
29:59petitioner can still submit it again,
30:01of course, meeting all the requirements
30:03, providing all the information,
30:05providing everything, well, everything
30:07that the entity requests for that
30:09process. There is, let's say, no
30:13prohibition that if a petition was
30:15filed away, it cannot be submitted
30:17again. If they file away your petition,
30:20you can simply submit it again, you can
30:22submit it again to that entity. Now,
30:26what would you answer if, for example,
30:28these questions appear on the exam? Is
30:31it possible to reject a petition or
30:33what happens if there is a petition
30:34that has been filed multiple times?
30:37That is to say, there is a petition
30:39that is like a frequently asked
30:40question that has been submitted many
30:42times to an entity. Well, the law
30:46speaks to us about disrespectful,
30:48obscure, or repetitive petitions. What
30:52is important to keep in mind here? Here
30:55they are telling us that all petitions
30:57submitted to entities must be
30:58respectful under penalty of rejection.
31:01What does that mean? That the only
31:05petitions that an entity can actually
31:07reject—we already saw that it is very
31:08complicated to reject one—but the
31:10case in which it can actually be
31:12rejected is when a petition is
31:13disrespectful. That would be like the
31:18only case, because the law indicates
31:19that all petitions must be respectful
31:21under penalty of rejection. So, that
31:24would be the only, only situation. Also
31:30, what I was mentioning to you earlier:
31:32if the purpose or the object of the
31:34petition is not understood, that is,
31:35the petitioner requested something, or
31:37filed a petition, but it is not clear
31:39what they actually want. In other words
31:45, perhaps they talk, perhaps they state
31:46their reasons, but in the end they
31:48don't say what their demands are or
31:50what they intend to achieve; what they
31:52expect from the entity, or how they
31:53want to be helped. Therefore, it cannot
31:56be answered because there is no
31:58question, there is no actual question.
32:02In such cases, that petition must be
32:03returned to the interested party so
32:05that they may clarify it within the
32:07following 10 days. And well, in case it
32:10is not corrected or clarified, then the
32:12petition will be filed away. That is
32:16what we saw earlier: that within 10
32:18days of receiving the petition, the
32:19citizen must be required to clarify or
32:21supplement their request. And in case
32:27they don't end up supplementing it, in
32:29case they don't communicate, then the
32:31petition is archived, and, likewise, it
32:33can be filed again. Let's remember that
32:38petitions that the entity considers
32:40inadequate or incomplete cannot be
32:42returned. The only petitions that can
32:46be returned or rejected are those that
32:48are disrespectful. Now, regarding
33:00petitions that have already been filed
33:02multiple times, perhaps by different
33:04people, petitions that are repetitive
33:06and that have already been answered
33:07previously, the entity can refer to
33:09responses that it has already given; or
33:11, well, here there would be a small
33:13exception, which would be in the case
33:14of rights or petitions that were denied
33:16for not meeting requirements. That
33:27would be the only exception to this
33:29section. Well, let's see. Um. Let's—
33:39well, you are asking a lot about the
33:41registrar's office competition. Yes, I
33:43believe the registrar's office
33:45competition was postponed. Keep in mind
33:50that the response to the—well, not
33:52the response, but the list of admitted
33:54candidates, that is, the people who
33:56passed the minimum requirements
33:58verification, was going to be published
34:00tomorrow, tomorrow, May 6th. But if you
34:06go and look at the registrar's schedule
34:08right now, it was extended, I think,
34:09until next month or two months from now
34:11. I think they extended it by quite a
34:14long deadline. So if we have time,
34:17we'll review the schedule now; we're
34:19going to continue reviewing the topic,
34:20and if we have time, we'll look at the
34:22issue of the registry office. Well,
34:30let's continue. An important topic
34:37regarding the right of petition that
34:39will surely help you answer your exam
34:40is the subject of priority petitions
34:42and how they are handled. On your exam,
34:48they might ask you, what happens, for
34:50example, if a journalist files a right
34:52of petition? Is it the same as if a
34:55regular person files it, or what
34:56treatment should it be given? The law
35:07speaks to us about the priority
35:08attention of petitions and basically
35:10tells us that entities can give
35:12priority attention to petitions where a
35:13fundamental right is recognized, when
35:15these petitions must be resolved to
35:17avoid irreparable harm to the
35:18petitioner. Let's remember that,
35:29likewise, if it is a right that could
35:31be affected, there is also the remedy
35:33of protection (tutela), which exists
35:35precisely for those cases where a
35:36fundamental right could be affected.
35:42And this happens a lot, for example, in
35:44health cases, where they don't deliver,
35:46for instance, a medication that could
35:48become indispensable if it isn't
35:50consumed within, I don't know, 24 or 48
35:52hours. That is precisely what the*
35:56tutelas*are for, but well, you could
35:58also submit a right of petition, which
36:00perhaps isn't as recommended given the
36:02existence of the*tutela*figure, but the
36:04option is there. Hm. Also when, for
36:10security reasons, the life or integrity
36:17of the petitioner is in danger, the
36:19authority or entity must adopt the
36:21necessary emergency measures to protect
36:23that person. Which, well, this would be
36:28the ideal. I have never had to file
36:31such a petition, but I don't know how
36:32much it is applied in practice. Let's
36:35say this is sort of the theory. I don't
36:38know if when it comes to applying it—
36:40I'm not saying no, maybe so—but I
36:42have never, ever had to file a petition
36:44for security reasons. So, I don't know
36:49if effectively the police or the
36:51authority to whom we file this petition
36:53would act in accordance with this law,
36:54quickly ensuring that the petitioner is
36:56in no danger. And we are also told that
37:02if the petition is raised or carried
37:04out by a journalist for the exercise of
37:06their journalistic activity, it will
37:08also be given preferential processing.
37:16So, basically here we can see that when
37:18there are fundamental rights that could
37:20cause harm to the petitioner, or when
37:22it involves security issues, or when
37:23the request is filed by a journalist,
37:25these are requests that have
37:27preferential treatment, a priority
37:28process. What would you answer if your
37:38exam asks you what to do with a request
37:39about a topic? that is not within the
37:42entity's jurisdiction. What to do if a
37:45person, for example, files a request
37:47regarding mobility at the Department of
37:49Health? The Department of Health has
37:52nothing to do with mobility. What would
37:54be done in that case? If you receive,
37:57if you work at the Department of Health
37:59and you get a request about mobility
38:00issues, what should you do? Well, the
38:12law speaks to us about officials
38:13without jurisdiction, and basically it
38:15says that if the entity to which the
38:17request is addressed is not the
38:18competent one—for example, if the
38:20request is written to the Department of
38:22Health, but upon reading it, it’s
38:24actually about, I don't know, vehicle
38:26impound lots, something related to
38:27roads, or infrastructure, matters that
38:29have nothing to do with the Department
38:31of Health—then in that case, the
38:33interested party or petitioner must be
38:35informed, whether it is being handled
38:37verbally or if it is a written request,
38:38they must be informed within the 5
38:40business days following the receipt of
38:42that request. Now, what happens within
38:53these 5 business days? That within
38:56these 5 days, that request must be
38:58transferred. So, the request is
39:02forwarded to the competent entity. If
39:06it is, for example, mobility, then the
39:08Department of Health must forward that
39:10request, must transfer it, precisely
39:12because it is a matter within their
39:14jurisdiction. And for this action, for
39:22this transfer, a copy must be sent to
39:24the petitioner, so they know that the
39:26entity where they filed the request was
39:28not the competent one, but that it will
39:30be processed because the request was
39:32transferred to the competent entity,
39:33and in. in the event that there is no
39:40competent entity, I don't know, they
39:42are asking something, I don't know,
39:44very random. then they must be informed
39:48that there is no entity that has
39:49jurisdiction over that subject matter.
39:55And, uh, of course, during, uh, during
39:58the transfer, some amount of time may
40:00pass, because if it's a physical
40:02petition, maybe the courier...If it's,
40:04uh, virtual, well, maybe with virtual
40:06there isn't so much of a problem. But
40:12here they tell us that the terms to
40:14respond to that request will be counted
40:16starting from the day after the receipt
40:17of the petition by the competent
40:19authority. What would you answer if on
40:28your exam they ask you what happens if
40:30more than 10 people file the same
40:32petition? What happens if a very large
40:34group of people files a petition that
40:36is exactly the same? Well, the law
40:40tells us, uh, it speaks to us about the
40:42organization for internal processing
40:44and the decision on petitions. Hm. Here
40:53they tell us that entities must
40:54regulate or must organize themselves to
40:56know how they are going to process
40:57those petitions internally. If you have
41:03worked in public entities, well, you
41:04know that perhaps not all of them work
41:06in the same way. Some make great use of
41:10information and communications
41:12technology. Others handle more virtual
41:18petitions, perhaps, but all of them
41:19must have a way in which they process
41:21those petitions and the way they are
41:23going to address complaints to ensure
41:24the proper functioning of services that
41:26fall under that entity's jurisdiction.
41:33So, I have seen, for example, that, in
41:35fact, all entities should have, like,
41:37their citizen service area; they should
41:40have, well, a management system for
41:42those petitions. Some, well, have a
41:46very, very good system; others, uh,
41:48like in the district-level sector, for
41:51example, they use" Bogotá Escucha, "
41:53which is also very good because it
41:55integrates, or utilizes, or coordinates
41:57, rather, the different district
41:59entities. But all without exception
42:04must have a procedure by which they
42:05will respond to those requests. Now,
42:11what happens if more than 10 people
42:13formulate analogous petitions or
42:15identical petitions that are very, very
42:17similar, that at their core are asking
42:19for the same thing, whether it's for
42:20information—let's remember the terms?
42:27For information, it's 10 business days;
42:29for general interest, which as a
42:30general rule is 15 business days; or
42:32for consultation, which we should
42:34remember that when they are
42:36consultations within the entity's
42:37jurisdiction, it's 30 business days.
42:42Well, in those cases, the entity can
42:44provide a single response, and this is
42:46a question that often appears on exams.
42:50Exactly, what happens when more than 10
42:52people file a petition? Well, the
42:56entity may provide a single response
42:58which must be published in a widely
43:00circulated newspaper. Ready? Let's
43:04remember this. When there are more than
43:0910 people submitting similar petitions
43:11or the same petition, the entity may
43:13provide a single response and must
43:15publish it in a widely circulated
43:16newspaper. That question has appeared,
43:22I think, two or three times on the, uh,
43:25on the exams. And, well, they will also
43:31post it on their website and must
43:32provide a copy to all interested
43:34parties or all petitioners who request
43:36it. Let's remember this one very well
43:41because it is very possible that they
43:43will ask us about it on an exam. On
43:48your exam, they may ask you where a
43:49citizen should turn if their right to
43:51petition was not accepted. What entity
43:55can support them if, for example, that
43:58citizen went to, well, an entity, let's
44:00not mention any names, and they did not
44:02accept that request? Well, the law
44:07speaks to us about the special duties
44:09of district and municipal personeros
44:10and the officials of the Inspector
44:12General's Office and the Ombudsman's
44:14Office. of the people. Basically, they
44:19tell us that the officials of the
44:21Office of the Inspector General of the
44:23Nation, the Ombudsman's Office, and the
44:25district and municipal personeros,
44:27according to their jurisdiction, have
44:28the duty, right? It is, it is as they
44:33have the authority to provide
44:35assistance to all persons who request
44:37it to guarantee them the exercise of
44:38the right of petition. Also, this, this
44:42question hasn't been asked of me, but
44:44well, they could eventually ask it
44:46because it is an important topic. If
44:49necessary, they must intervene before
44:50the competent authorities. If a person
44:56went to the Health Secretariat, well,
44:58to health, and they didn't accept the
45:00right of petition, well, they can go to
45:02one of these entities and they can
45:03intervene before these, uh, authorities
45:05that are indeed competent to demand,
45:07well, the fulfillment of their duties,
45:09since they would have to respond to
45:11that right of petition. But they can
45:19also receive, let's say if, if they
45:21didn't receive a person's petition at a
45:23certain entity, they can receive it in
45:25place of that competent entity. And,
45:32well, clearly afterwards they would
45:33have to, as we already saw, they would
45:36have to forward it and ensure that it
45:42is processed correctly, that they
45:43provide a response to that petitioner.
45:50Well, let's look at some questions that
45:52have been asked of us. They ask us if
45:59this, if this live session remains
46:01recorded. Yes, remember that it remains
46:04recorded in the, well, on my channel,
46:06in the live or broadcast section. If
46:10you want to check it later, you can to,
46:12well, to continue studying. They ask us
46:15, what does analogous mean? Well,
46:16analogous is how I interpret it, right?
46:19I don't know the exact definition, but
46:21I interpret it as very similar, as
46:22almost the same. How should anonymous
46:26petitions be handled? John asks us.
46:32Well, I think in Law 1755, as such, the
46:34topic of anonymous petitions isn't
46:36there, but normally it's done...If you
46:38try to file an anonymous petition, you
46:40still have to be given a filing number
46:43if you do it online, because an
46:44anonymous petition in person is more
46:46difficult. Online, you can do it, you
46:53can be given a filing number and you
46:55can subsequently check it with that
46:57filing number. That would be one way to
47:00deal with anonymous petitions. They ask
47:07us if the questions we are going to be
47:09asked about rights of petition, or in
47:11general, might include true or false
47:12questions. Normally, no. Normally, if
47:19you take a test, I mean, there are
47:21questions that are true or false, but
47:23only in very, very specific competitive
47:25exams. Usually, in the CNSC
47:28competitions or practically any
47:30competition, you won't get true or
47:32false questions. Always, or at least in
47:37all the competitions I have taken, they
47:39are questions with three answer options
47:41, A, B, or C, which use the situational
47:43judgment methodology. But that's
47:48because I haven't applied to entities
47:50like the INPEC, where they have these
47:51types of different tests that aren't
47:53just three answer options; sometimes
47:55there are six, sometimes five, and I
47:57think there are also true or false ones
47:59. So, well, that's something to keep in
48:05mind. Let's continue with the topic.
48:19Well, uh...we are going to look at
48:23chapter two of the right of petition
48:24before authorities. What are those
48:26special rules? This is a fundamental
48:30chapter of the rights of petition and
48:31in exams they usually ask quite a few
48:33questions about this topic. For example
48:39, in the written tests of a competition
48:41, you might be asked what type of
48:42information can only be requested by
48:44the holders of that information. Well,
48:51the law speaks to us about confidential
48:53information and documents and tells us
48:55that only information and documents
48:57expressly subjected to confidentiality
48:59by the Political Constitution or law
49:01will be considered confidential. And
49:11they give us some, well, some examples:
49:13for instance, those related to national
49:15defense or security, those that are
49:17instructions on diplomatic matters or
49:19reserved negotiations, and this is
49:21important, those involving rights to
49:23people’s privacy and intimacy. Uh,
49:32here we have, for example, résumés,
49:34employment history, pension files, and,
49:36well, other information that may be in
49:38entities or in the archives of public
49:40or private entities. And here we also
49:45have medical records. Medical records
49:48also, uh, well, have confidential
49:50treatment. Those related to financial
49:56conditions of public credit operations
49:58and the national treasury; these are
50:00perhaps a bit more abstract, maybe they
50:02don’t affect us as much in our
50:03day-to-day lives. And also matters
50:09regarding technical studies of national
50:11assets. I don’t think they would ever
50:15ask about this in any competition or
50:16exam, but it’s still good, good to
50:18know. Uh topics, for example, such as
50:27data concerning financial and
50:28commercial information or topics like,
50:30for instance, commercial or industrial
50:33secrets. Well, this one is quite
50:39important, too; topics like strategic
50:41plans of public companies or public
50:43utilities. Well, we see that there are
50:47different, like, like different, uh
50:52types or different confidential
50:54categories. Uh there would be some a
50:59bit, a bit more, I don't know, abstract
51:01, it seems to me, which are, for
51:03example, human genetic data. Those also
51:06have confidential treatment. Uh, really
51:10, on this particular topic, I have
51:12never been asked; no one has asked me a
51:14question about, for example, whether
51:16trade or industrial secrets are
51:18protected; they haven't asked those
51:20kinds of questions. Or about whether
51:25financial information data, uh, under
51:27the terms of the statutory law, are
51:29protected. Well, no, but that doesn't
51:34mean that at some point we couldn't be
51:36asked a question about this topic,
51:38especially regarding data that has to
51:40do with people’s right to privacy and
51:42intimacy. That is more likely to be
51:47asked in an exam. Now, what is
51:51important to keep in mind? That for the
51:59purposes of requesting confidential
52:01information, those related to the
52:03rights to people’s privacy and
52:05intimacy, those referring to financial
52:07and commercial information, those
52:08protected by industrial secrets, and
52:10those covered by professional secrecy.
52:20Those four can only be requested by the
52:22owner of the information or by their
52:23legal representatives and/or authorized
52:25persons. Those would be the only cases.
52:30Uh, but well, this topic is very
52:32specific, really almost never. Well, I
52:34think, as far as I can remember, I have
52:36never been asked this in an exam.
52:40Perhaps the issue of, of, uh, what I
52:41was telling you about the right to
52:43privacy and intimacy would be the only
52:45one; but the others are perhaps a bit
52:47more ambiguous and we might not get
52:48asked about them. If they ask you on
52:55your exam what to do when a document
52:57containing private information is
52:58requested, what would you answer? We
53:02have already seen what some categories
53:04of confidential information are. Well,
53:08the law tells us about the rejection of
53:11requests, uh, information requests due
53:13to confidentiality. So, if for example
53:18they are requesting a medical record,
53:19we have already seen that medical
53:21records are confidential, they are
53:23protected, so, what is important to
53:25keep in mind? Practically here we must
53:30consider that any decision made by the
53:32entity to reject the request for
53:34information or documents must be
53:36justified. Ready? It must be justified,
53:40in this case due to the fact that it is
53:42confidential information, reserved
53:44information. But the entity must also
53:50precisely indicate what those legal
53:51provisions are that prevent it from
53:53handing over the information or those
53:55documents that the petitioner is
53:56requesting, and this information must
53:58be communicated in the response. Well,
54:06this information would practically be
54:08the same Law 1755 or Law 1437 of 2011,
54:10where they tell us what those
54:12categories are with a reserved
54:14character or classified information.
54:19And well, but anyway that information
54:21must be communicated to the petitioner,
54:23so that he knows. Uh, and well, against
54:27this decision that the entity takes to
54:29reject that request for reasons of
54:31legal reservation, no appeal proceeds.
54:35Ready? Except, uh, well, what we are
54:38going to see later on. Uh, but
54:42basically the restriction due to this
54:44legal reservation, which also must be
54:46kept very much in mind. This
54:50restriction due to reservation does not
54:52extend to other parts of the document
54:54being requested. What happens? For
54:58example, there may be a, I don't know,
55:00a contract, let's use that example,
55:02that has some sections that are
55:04classified. For example, page 5 to 10
55:08is classified, that information cannot
55:10be shown, but the first pages can, and
55:12page 11 to 20 as well. Therefore, the
55:18entity cannot simply refuse to hand
55:19over that document because it has
55:21classified information. What should be
55:29done is to provide the information that
55:30is not classified and censor or remove
55:32the information that is, because what
55:34the law tells us is that this
55:35restriction does not extend to other
55:37parts of that file or proceeding. On
55:46your exam, they might ask you, for
55:48example, what to do if a person insists
55:50on a request that was denied due to
55:52confidentiality. So, that person
55:56already requested information that is
55:58protected or classified, but that
56:00person insists. The law speaks to us
56:05precisely about the applicant's
56:06insistence in the event that the
56:08information is confidential. And what
56:11does it tell us? Well, if the entity
56:18already received the first request,
56:20told the petitioner that said request
56:22or information could not be provided
56:24because it was confidential, and that
56:26petitioner asks the same thing again,
56:28well in those cases, yes, in those
56:29cases the entity that states or invokes
56:31that legal confidentiality, well, in
56:44this case, the, well, it depends; it
56:46may correspond to the administrative
56:48tribunal that has jurisdiction in the
56:50place where the documents are located,
56:52if it is a national authority, or to an
57:01administrative judge, if it concerns
57:03district and municipal authorities. But
57:10basically, here it is a matter of
57:12competence. It may be either the
57:22administrative tribunal or the
57:23administrative judge, but the important
57:25thing is that in these cases, it is not
57:27the entity that decides again or denies
57:29the request to the petitioner again,
57:31but rather it refers it to the
57:32competent authority, whether it be the
57:34administrative judge, if it is a
57:36district or municipal authority, or the
57:38administrative tribunal that has
57:39jurisdiction where the documents
57:41requested are located. To do this, to
57:54send that request to either the
57:56tribunal or the judge, the official
57:57sends this documentation, which either
57:59the judge or the tribunal must decide
58:01upon within the following 10 days. In
58:08other words, it is very, very similar.
58:12Well, this term I think is a little
58:13different, because if the tribunal has
58:1510 days to respond, it is as if it had
58:17those 10 days which are the 10 days for
58:19an information request. But that term
58:26can be interrupted; those 10 days that
58:28the administrative tribunal or
58:30administrative judge has can be
58:31interrupted, for example, when the
58:33tribunal or judge requests a copy of
58:35the documents upon which they must
58:37decide. I mean, if they didn't send the
58:43judge the information, then they have
58:45to send it to him; otherwise, he won't
58:47be able to respond. Well, one moment,
58:56let's see, give me a moment. Ready.
59:08Another way this deadline can be
59:09interrupted is when the entity asks the
59:11Council of State section to take up the
59:13matter due to its legal importance in
59:15order to unify criteria on the subject.
59:22Well, this has never actually come up
59:24on an exam for me, but that doesn't
59:25mean they couldn't ask about it. And
59:31well, if after 5 days, let's say, the
59:33section remains silent or decides not
59:35to take up the case, the proceedings
59:37continue before the respective court or
59:39administrative judge. So, well, these
59:44are somewhat special cases in which
59:46that term can be interrupted, but it is
59:48important that we keep them in mind.
59:55Here, ultimately, the important thing
59:57to know is that if the petitioner has
59:58already been told that they cannot,
1:00:00well, that the information is
1:00:02confidential and the petitioner insists
1:00:04, then in that case the information or
1:00:05that case must be sent to the court or
1:00:07administrative judge, depending on
1:00:09jurisdiction, for them to respond. That
1:00:15is the most important thing to keep in
1:00:16mind in this section. Well, the law
1:00:23also tells us about the inapplicability
1:00:25of the exceptions. We already saw what
1:00:30those exceptions are, but we must keep
1:00:31in mind that they will not always apply
1:00:33. In what cases might they not apply?
1:00:45For example, if there is information
1:00:47that is confidential, or certain
1:00:48documents are classified, this does not
1:00:50apply to judicial or legislative
1:00:52authorities, nor to administrative
1:00:54authorities that, being competent,
1:00:56request it for the exercise of their
1:00:58functions. So, those would be like some
1:01:07exceptions. In those cases, that
1:01:10information could indeed be sent. And
1:01:14in these cases, it is up to those
1:01:16entities to ensure the confidentiality
1:01:18of that information. That information
1:01:25cannot be handled carelessly; rather,
1:01:27these entities must ensure they guard
1:01:29and take very good care of that
1:01:30information because, in a way, they
1:01:32were granted control and the protection
1:01:34of that confidential or classified
1:01:36information. Now, something else the
1:01:46law tells us is the scope of legal
1:01:48opinions. What is important to keep in
1:01:51mind here? Well, regarding legal
1:02:01opinions, we must keep in mind that
1:02:03when an entity responds to a petition
1:02:04that is in the nature of a consultation
1:02:06, we must remember that those responses
1:02:08are not mandatory or binding. This is
1:02:20something many of us have surely seen
1:02:22in the opinions issued by the Civil
1:02:23Service Department, for instance, which
1:02:25issues very good opinions. Here, they
1:02:30basically clarify information for the
1:02:32petitioner on different topics. I have
1:02:34seen very, very different topics. What
1:02:39I have searched for the most are topics
1:02:41related to public employment, which is
1:02:43what the Civil Service Department does
1:02:45most; it is like their strong suit, and
1:02:47they provide a very good explanation of
1:02:48the law, of how they believe it should
1:02:50be interpreted. But, in the end, they
1:02:57say:" in the opinion of this authority,
1:02:59we believe such and such is the case
1:03:01because of this, "but that does not
1:03:02mean that the information they provide,
1:03:04that opinion given, for example, by the
1:03:06Civil Service Department on a different
1:03:08subject, is mandatory to follow or
1:03:10execute. That is important for us to
1:03:15keep in mind. Well, let's look at some
1:03:21questions that have come in. Lina,
1:03:23thank you very much for purchasing the
1:03:25membership; I welcome you. Well, they
1:03:29are talking a lot about the National
1:03:31Registry here. Yes, I think we are
1:03:33already finishing this topic. So, as
1:03:35soon as we finish it, we will review
1:03:37the topic of the National Registry.
1:03:46Well, let's continue. An important
1:03:54topic that you might be asked about
1:03:56regarding rights of petition, and which
1:03:58will very likely help you answer your
1:03:59exam, is the topic of petitions before
1:04:01authorities and sanctions. What is
1:04:06important to keep in mind here? Here
1:04:08they tell us, for example, about the
1:04:10reproduction of documents. So, what
1:04:14would you answer if, on your exam, they
1:04:16ask you what happens if a petitioner
1:04:18requests a large quantity of documents?
1:04:23Should those copies be paid for by,
1:04:25let's say, the entity? Or is the
1:04:29petitioner the one in charge of paying
1:04:31for the cost of reproducing those
1:04:33documents? It is a question that could
1:04:36potentially come up. What is important
1:04:39to keep in mind here? That in no case
1:04:43can the price of the copies, yes, the
1:04:45price of those copies that the
1:04:46petitioner is requesting, exceed the
1:04:48cost of reproduction, meaning the value
1:04:51it costs to, I don't know, make each
1:04:52copy. So, for example, if you go to a
1:05:00stationery store, a copy might cost you
1:05:03200 pesos because they have to spend on
1:05:05ink, they have to spend on electricity,
1:05:07they have to spend on, well, the
1:05:09printer, the depreciation, and they
1:05:11also have to make a profit margin. But
1:05:19let's assume that a stationery store
1:05:21spends 100 pesos to make each copy and
1:05:23sells them for 200; well, they would
1:05:25have those 100 pesos in profit before
1:05:27taxes. In the case of government
1:05:30entities, it is not like that. If it
1:05:33costs the entity 100 pesos to make a
1:05:36copy in electricity, ink, printer
1:05:38depreciation, and so on, that is the
1:05:40maximum amount they can charge. This
1:05:47reproduction of documents cannot
1:05:48represent a profit for the entity; it
1:05:50cannot be a form of revenue for the
1:05:52nation. So, it is important to keep in
1:06:00mind that the cost of this reproduction
1:06:02cannot exceed the commercial reference
1:06:03value in the market. Got it? It cannot
1:06:07be higher than that value. What would
1:06:16you answer if, on an exam, they asked
1:06:18you, for example, if the Secretary of
1:06:20Health makes a request for information
1:06:22or a petition to the Secretary of
1:06:23Mobility, how many days would that
1:06:25secretariat have to respond? Could it
1:06:32be the same timeframe? Could it be a
1:06:34shorter timeframe? A longer timeframe.
1:06:41Well, the law speaks to us precisely
1:06:43about petitions between authorities and
1:06:45tells us that when one entity submits a
1:06:46request for information or documents to
1:06:48another entity, that entity must
1:06:50resolve it within a period of no more
1:06:52than 10 days. What does this mean? Well
1:06:59, practically, even if it is an
1:07:01authority—for example, one district
1:07:03secretariat asking another district or
1:07:05territorial secretariat—the timeframe
1:07:08is the same. It is those 10 days for a
1:07:14request for information, and in other
1:07:16cases, the requests are resolved within
1:07:18the terms already seen previously. If
1:07:23it is general, it is 15 days, and if it
1:07:26is an inquiry, it is 30 days. So, this
1:07:33information given in the law is a bit
1:07:35curious because one might think that
1:07:37from one authority or entity to another
1:07:39, there would be some kind of
1:07:40preference, a way to respond faster.
1:07:48But no, practically, they are telling
1:07:50us here that even if it is an authority
1:07:52or an entity making a request to
1:07:54another, it must be answered exactly as
1:07:56if it were a normal petition submitted
1:07:57by a citizen. Now, what would you
1:08:06answer if on your exam they asked you
1:08:07what the consequences are if a public
1:08:09servant does not respond to a petition
1:08:11within the established terms? Does it
1:08:16have any consequence? Could it be that
1:08:19nothing happens? Could it be a
1:08:20reprimand? What would happen in this
1:08:22case? Well, the law speaks to us about
1:08:26disciplinary offenses, disciplinary
1:08:28faults, and sanctions for public
1:08:30servants. And here they are telling us
1:08:36that when a petition is not addressed,
1:08:37and the deadlines for resolving each
1:08:39petition according to its type are not
1:08:41met, well, um, in these cases, this
1:08:51inaction, this omission on the part of
1:08:53the public servant, leads to the
1:08:55corresponding sanctions in accordance
1:08:56with the disciplinary regime. So, let's
1:09:04keep in mind that if a public servant
1:09:06does not respond to a petition within
1:09:08the established terms, it leads to an
1:09:10investigation and a possible
1:09:11disciplinary sanction. So, there is
1:09:16indeed a consequence for public
1:09:18servants who fail to respond to a
1:09:19petition. Well, let's see. Uh, I think
1:09:31more questions here talk to us about
1:09:34various contests. We are about to
1:09:37finish this topic. We are going to
1:09:39finish the topic of rights of petition
1:09:41and start answering the questions you
1:09:42have. We are going to talk about
1:09:48Chapter 3 of Law 1755, which speaks to
1:09:52us about the right of petition before
1:09:54private organizations and institutions.
1:09:57What is important to keep in mind? I
1:10:00would say this is not such an important
1:10:02topic because, personally, I don't
1:10:03think I've ever been asked about it. I
1:10:07don't think I've ever been asked, but
1:10:08it is important that you at least know
1:10:10what it is about. Now, here they talk
1:10:15to us about the right of petition
1:10:17before private organizations to
1:10:18guarantee fundamental rights. What do
1:10:22they tell us here? They tell us that
1:10:28everyone, any citizen, can exercise the
1:10:30right of petition to guarantee their
1:10:32fundamental rights before private
1:10:34institutions with or without legal
1:10:36personality, for example, societies,
1:10:39corporations, foundations, associations
1:10:41, religious organizations, cooperatives
1:10:43, financial institutions, or clubs. And
1:10:53well, practically these entities or
1:10:55these private organizations—this
1:10:57could actually be a question on an exam
1:10:59—are subject to the same principles
1:11:01and rules established in Chapter One,
1:11:03which is the one we already saw. Now,
1:11:16on the subject of these institutions—
1:11:17yes, these private institutions—in
1:11:19order for them to invoke a reservation
1:11:21regarding the requested information,
1:11:23that information can only be withheld
1:11:25in cases expressly established in the
1:11:27Political Constitution and the law.
1:11:37which, well, ultimately I would believe
1:11:39they would be very similar to those
1:11:40that already exist, but clearly with
1:11:42the exceptions that these entities do
1:11:44not manage public resources and, well,
1:11:46there would be some that would not
1:11:47apply, but many of those we saw would
1:11:49indeed have that reservation in
1:11:51companies. It is important that
1:12:03requests made to companies or
1:12:05individuals who manage financial,
1:12:07credit, commercial, service, or foreign
1:12:09databases, are governed by the
1:12:10provisions found in the Habeas Data law
1:12:12. This is a law that we might look at
1:12:23later on. It is a very interesting law.
1:12:28It might not be asked about that often
1:12:29in examinations, but it could be good
1:12:31for you to know it. The subject of
1:12:42personal data protection is becoming
1:12:43increasingly important in organizations
1:12:45, or at least that is my perception
1:12:47from working in these entities; it
1:12:49seems that more and more importance is
1:12:51being given to data protection, which I
1:12:53think is a very good approach to
1:12:54protect sensitive, private information
1:12:56belonging to us all—information that
1:12:58entities hold but do not always protect
1:13:00well, leaving it exposed. That is
1:13:10precisely why the Habeas Data law and
1:13:12others aim to protect the information
1:13:14of citizens and individuals. Mm. Well,
1:13:21let's continue. In general, private
1:13:29organizations are treated practically
1:13:31the same as public entities regarding
1:13:33rights of petition. For example, they
1:13:38cannot refuse to receive a petition.
1:13:44However, in these cases, if an entity
1:13:46refuses to respond to a petition, they
1:13:48may incur sanctions or fines from the
1:13:50competent authorities. So, in a way,
1:13:56they are treated very similarly to
1:13:58public entities. Well, the law also
1:14:04tells us about the right of petition
1:14:06for users before private institutions.
1:14:11And here they speak to us about some
1:14:15specific institutions. They mention
1:14:23family compensation funds, social
1:14:24security system institutions, financial
1:14:27system entities, public utility
1:14:28services, and those governed by private
1:14:30law. They tell us that practically in
1:14:41all of them, in their relationship with
1:14:43users—or clients, we could say—all
1:14:45the provisions on rights of petition
1:14:47that we saw in chapters one and two
1:14:49apply. As I mentioned, these entities
1:14:57have practically the same
1:14:58responsibilities as a public entity.
1:15:03Therefore, practically the entirety of
1:15:06Law 1755 of 2015 applies to all of them
1:15:11. Well, that is all for this topic. I
1:15:21hope it has been helpful, I hope that
1:15:23it is, well, useful for answering those
1:15:25questions you might be asked regarding
1:15:27petitions. Uh, much of the information
1:15:33we saw today has, in fact, been asked
1:15:35on my exams. Other information perhaps
1:15:39not, perhaps I haven't been asked it,
1:15:41but that doesn't mean they won't ask it
1:15:43at some point. So, this law is
1:15:46important, Law 1755, it is very short.
1:15:51It is a law, a very, very short law, it
1:15:54has like six or seven pages. So, it is
1:15:57highly recommended that we review it,
1:15:59that we know it, that I, for example,
1:16:01before every, practically before every
1:16:06uh, exam, right? Before every exam I
1:16:11review it, I go over it to remember the
1:16:13most important information. And, very
1:16:18surely, I know that they will very
1:16:19surely ask me about much of the
1:16:21information that is there. So, it is
1:16:26important to study this law, to know it
1:16:28, so that we can use it, so that the
1:16:30information helps us in the
1:16:31competitions and the exams we take.
1:16:37Well, let's answer the questions. Let's
1:16:40answer the questions that are in the
1:16:41chat. Uh, give me a moment here. Hm. I
1:16:47am going to set it up to be able to see
1:16:49the chat here. Well, I think now ready.
1:17:02Let's see. Mm. Mm. There. Ready. Well,
1:17:13let's look at the chat. Let's see some
1:17:16questions we received. Uh, Lina, thank
1:17:18you very much again for purchasing the
1:17:20membership. Uh, here which which topic
1:17:29would you like us to look at later?
1:17:32What topic would you like us to cover
1:17:34for the next live streams? Well, one of
1:17:39the topics we are going to look at is
1:17:41customer service, which is also an
1:17:43important topic for the competitions.
1:17:49Uh, basically, we are going to look at
1:17:51all the basic competencies that are
1:17:53super relevant. But well, what other
1:17:56topic would you like? Let's remember
1:18:01that I did today's topic thinking a bit
1:18:03about the registrar's office
1:18:04competition that was going to start,
1:18:06the day the exam was going to be held
1:18:08next month, but it was postponed, they
1:18:09postponed it. Let's see what people are
1:18:21commenting a lot about, which is the
1:18:23registrar's office calendar. Let's see,
1:18:28because, well, I don't think this is
1:18:30the page, I think this is already
1:18:32redirecting to another page. W
1:18:37Registraduría is this one here. Let's
1:18:41look at the schedule. What happened?
1:18:43What happened here? Well, they changed
1:18:46this schedule today, I think, or maybe
1:18:48yesterday. If we look here at the
1:18:56Registrar's website, we can see that
1:18:58the schedule, which previously had the
1:19:00BRM publication date set for tomorrow,
1:19:02I believe, May 6th, has been extended a
1:19:05lot, a whole lot, I would say. They
1:19:11extended it until July 15th. July 15th.
1:19:19So, well, clearly they are no longer
1:19:21going to hold the exam next month. It
1:19:25did seem a bit, uh, exaggerated to me,
1:19:27the like the, the time they had given
1:19:33for these stages, because practically
1:19:34they were giving I think less than two
1:19:36months to Yes, less than 1 2 3 4 5.
1:19:44Well, they were giving two months to—
1:19:46yes, less than two, less than two—to
1:19:48review all the requirements, the entire
1:19:50verification of minimum requirements
1:19:52for all the people who applied. I don't
1:19:57remember how many had applied, but I
1:19:59think it was 300,000, 200,000. Of
1:20:02course, that's a lot. And that's even
1:20:07though the website was malfunctioning,
1:20:09many, many people still applied. Hm.
1:20:16Well, let's see. Let's answer the
1:20:20questions. I remind those people who
1:20:25might want to purchase the membership,
1:20:27some people have purchased it in this
1:20:29live stream, that they can do it here
1:20:31on my channel, Misión Mérito, right
1:20:33here where it says" Join. "Remember
1:20:35that the cost is 10,000 per month. Well
1:20:37, you have access to different benefits
1:20:39. This live stream today might remain
1:20:43only for channel members, but later on,
1:20:45later on, uh, so that everyone can
1:20:47study, and well, later it will be only
1:20:49for channel members. John, thank you
1:20:55very much for purchasing the membership
1:20:57, I welcome you. Let's see what
1:20:59questions, what questions had come in.
1:21:03I'm going to leave the schedule here so
1:21:05we can keep it in mind. The results of
1:21:10the minimum requirements verification
1:21:12will no longer be published tomorrow,
1:21:14but rather in two months, in more than
1:21:16two months. Jorge tells us about the
1:21:29topic of document management, well, it
1:21:31could be document management, it could
1:21:33be. Milena says, office automation.
1:21:37Well, office automation could also be
1:21:39it, it is a very important topic.
1:21:42Camila says to us," Document management
1:21:44, "they tell us MIPG. Well, MIPG is not
1:21:48a topic I like very much, to be honest,
1:21:51but it is also important. Go ahead,
1:21:55Paola. Ready, with pleasure. Regardless
1:21:57, this is the schedule. Ready. This is
1:22:00the new schedule for us to keep in mind
1:22:02. Document management, office
1:22:05automation. Well, let's do a survey.
1:22:08We're going to do a survey. tell us
1:22:13what topic you would like for, well, it
1:22:19won't be the next one, I mean, it won't
1:22:21be the Wednesday live stream, but I
1:22:23think maybe we can do a live study
1:22:25session every week for the competitions
1:22:26. the next study live stream. So
1:22:34they're saying over here office
1:22:36software, they're mentioning document
1:22:40management and MPG and what was the
1:22:47other one MIPG. Well, it could be the
1:22:52Political Constitution. We'll look into
1:22:58those. To start with the basic
1:23:06competencies and then from there move
1:23:08towards competencies that are, well,
1:23:10more mission-specific to each entity.
1:23:29The next one I still think will be
1:23:30about citizen service, I believe. But
1:23:34afterwards, we could look at document
1:23:36management. I see that it's the one
1:23:38people are most interested in. Document
1:23:40management and then office software. It
1:23:43could be the unified civil registry
1:23:48circular. Well, the thing about the
1:23:50circular is that we have more time now.
1:23:56I mean, I was going to do them, I
1:23:57really was going to do those, but
1:23:59because I thought, well, until
1:24:01yesterday that was the case, that the
1:24:03exam was going to be next month, that
1:24:04we had practically less than a month to
1:24:06study; but with this new schedule, we
1:24:08see that we have, what? Maybe about 4
1:24:15months, 4 months until the registrar's
1:24:17office tests. So, well, they might be
1:24:24close to the National University tests,
1:24:26to the tests of the Comptroller's
1:24:31Office which are in October. These
1:24:34tests will possibly be in September.
1:24:38Maybe the registrar's office will hold
1:24:40their tests in September. So, all the
1:24:44topics we are covering in these live
1:24:46streams, citizen service, right to
1:24:48petition, document management, office
1:24:50software, MIPG, Constitution, are
1:24:52topics that will be useful for all the
1:24:54competitions you are applying for. Well
1:24:59, I will take this distribution into
1:25:01account. I'll do citizen service, then
1:25:03I'll do document management, which is
1:25:05not a subject that, I mean, I did work
1:25:07on that topic, but it's not like I
1:25:09master it. I'll try to explain at least
1:25:12the basics that you should know. And
1:25:17then we can look at the Political
1:25:18Constitution and MIPG. Those would be
1:25:24the next topics to review. Hm. the link
1:25:30for the schedule. Oh, well, I'll share
1:25:34it with you anyway, I'll share this
1:25:36link for the people who are registered
1:25:38in the" concur "or who signed up for
1:25:40the registrar's office competition. At
1:25:44this link you can see the new schedule.
1:25:52I pinned it there so those on TikTok
1:25:53can see it too. Well, there's the link.
1:26:04Uh, well, differences between YouTube
1:26:09and TikTok memberships. I actually
1:26:12recommend the YouTube one more, because
1:26:14on YouTube there are some exclusive
1:26:16videos, uh, there's study material. On
1:26:20TikTok, well, I always try to respond,
1:26:22uh, to the comments from the TikTok
1:26:24members. But truthfully, I'm always
1:26:28more attentive to those on YouTube. So
1:26:31if you want to get one, well, I'd
1:26:32recommend the YouTube one more. Well,
1:26:39Mari asks us a question: how often are
1:26:41calls for applications published for
1:26:43the Prosecutor's Office and which
1:26:45professions or technical roles are most
1:26:47in demand? Well, Mari, how often? I
1:26:50think they've been published more or
1:26:52less every 2 years, possibly the next
1:26:54one will also be in a year and a half
1:26:56or 2 years. And the one, the most
1:26:59requested profession is uh, law. Law is
1:27:06the most requested field. Well,
1:27:17remember, remember that the, the the
1:27:25list of admitted candidates for the
1:27:27Registrar's Office is not coming out
1:27:28tomorrow. It's not coming out tomorrow.
1:27:31I think I'm going to make a video, uh,
1:27:33about that, okay? I'm going to make a
1:27:35video to explain the new schedule, okay
1:27:37? Because now the new date is July 15th
1:27:45, in two, in two months. In two months.
1:27:51Uh, the lists from the Registrar's
1:27:53Office, why aren't they coming out
1:27:55tomorrow? Because I don't know, I think
1:27:58it's because the date was too soon.
1:28:00This is the list of registered
1:28:02applicants. This is the list of
1:28:03registered applicants. This is not the
1:28:05list of admitted candidates. That is
1:28:07different. It's one thing for me to
1:28:10register, another for me to be admitted
1:28:12. I mean, I register by uploading my
1:28:17documents, uh, by staying alert,
1:28:18clicking register, and that simply
1:28:20implies that I registered, that I'm
1:28:22participating in that selection process
1:28:24. It's something else entirely for me
1:28:29to be admitted; in order to be admitted
1:28:31, I had to have uploaded my high school
1:28:33diploma, basically, and my ID. This
1:28:40list simply says, everyone here
1:28:41registered; we don't know if they
1:28:43uploaded their ID, we don't know if
1:28:45they uploaded their high school diploma
1:28:47. That, we will perform that analysis
1:28:55and we will let you know who did upload
1:28:57all the information on July 15th. Got
1:29:02it. On July 15th, the results of who
1:29:05was admitted to the Registrar's Office
1:29:07will be released. Did they postpone the
1:29:13exam, Juan asks us. Yes, of course. The
1:29:17exam was actually in June, but clearly
1:29:19now, if they postponed the minimum
1:29:21requirements verification by two months
1:29:23, I’d say they’re going to postpone
1:29:25the exam by two months too, I would
1:29:26think. Like it was in June or maybe
1:29:34even more, because I’d say in August,
1:29:36but in August the the final list only
1:29:41just comes out, so maybe up to 3 months
1:29:43, it could be. Emerson asks us," I’ve
1:29:48been a professional in public
1:29:49accounting since 2023. My professional
1:29:53license is currently being processed.
1:29:55From what date should my professional
1:29:57experience count? "" Well, Emerson, in
1:30:00that case, you should count your
1:30:02experience starting from your
1:30:03graduation date. There are some
1:30:08professions that count their
1:30:10professional experience starting from
1:30:11the professional license, but
1:30:13accounting is not among those
1:30:14professions. The professions that are
1:30:19there are engineering and health
1:30:20professions. Maria tells us, "I
1:30:30registered and I don't appear in the
1:30:32list of registrants. Why does that
1:30:34happen?" Well, Maria, if you have the
1:30:38code you were given at registration, uh
1:30:40, if you want, file a formal petition.
1:30:43Actually, I haven't seen if I appear on
1:30:45that list. I have to check. Well, I
1:30:48would have to look for the code. I
1:30:50don't know if I have it here. No, but
1:30:51that code is the registration one,
1:30:53right? Hm. Maybe I took a screenshot,
1:30:58but well, I’d have to look for myself
1:31:00, but clearly, if you registered, you
1:31:02should be here, and in case you're not,
1:31:04but you do have the code, well, I would
1:31:06recommend that you send a formal
1:31:08petition to this email here. Concurso
1:31:132025 [email protected]. Take advantage
1:31:19of the fact that they postponed the
1:31:21publication of results and do it right
1:31:22away so you don't have problems later
1:31:24on. Ready. Emerson asks us, Mari, where
1:31:30can that list be seen? Mari, you can
1:31:34see it in the chat, I'm posting a link.
1:31:38Through that link, you will be able to
1:31:40access this page and here you simply
1:31:45click where it says list of registrants
1:31:47. It opens this list that has everyone
1:31:51registered in this contest. How many
1:31:56registered? I don't remember. Does
1:31:58anyone happen to have the number? Let's
1:32:01count. Let's see. 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
1:32:0918 20 22 24 26 28 30 36 38 40 43*4
1:32:27let's see 4225 more or less, well, it
1:32:30wasn't as many as you thought, about
1:32:33185,000 signed up more or less 185,000.
1:32:41So, clearly, I think that's why they
1:32:43postponed it. They postponed it because
1:32:46, I mean, 185,000 people—let’s say
1:32:49they have a team of, I don't know, 10
1:32:51people—that would be 10 people
1:32:53reviewing documents. Hm. That would
1:33:01mean each person would have to review
1:33:0318,000 documents, and if you divide
1:33:05that into, I don't know, they had about
1:33:072 months, into 60 days. I mean, each
1:33:11person would have to review 300
1:33:13documents every day, including weekends
1:33:15. That, with a team of 10 people—the
1:33:19fact is, all the dates were very, very
1:33:21close together. Surely that’s why
1:33:24they extended it so much, 2 months.
1:33:26It’s just that even with 2 months,
1:33:28they would still have to review 150
1:33:30applications daily. That, well, is not
1:33:32that easy. Okay, let's see, Alberto
1:33:42asks us, "Regarding professional
1:33:46experience, when several degrees are
1:33:48applying for a job, is professional
1:33:49experience counted from the issuance of
1:33:51the professional title?""Yes." Yes,
1:33:55Alberto, when only, for example, health
1:33:58professions are competing, experience
1:34:00is counted from the issuance of the
1:34:02professional license. But if health
1:34:08professions are competing with, for
1:34:10example, administration, for example, I
1:34:12don't know, psychology, education
1:34:14degrees, where experience counts from
1:34:16the graduation date, it would be unfair
1:34:18for those professions to have their
1:34:20experience counted from the...uh...
1:34:22license. So, in those cases, it is
1:34:28counted from the title, but if they are
1:34:30only competing among themselves, then
1:34:32the principle of equality applies, and
1:34:34for all of them, experience counts from
1:34:36the professional license. But Ana asks
1:34:41us, when is the District 6 exam? I
1:34:44think next month, it might be next
1:34:46month. District 6. District 6 is very
1:34:51close now, I mean, the Registrar’s
1:34:53Office and District 6 were, were very
1:34:56close. In fact, when I saw that they
1:35:02changed the Registrar’s Office
1:35:04schedule, I said, "Well, maybe, the
1:35:06topic for today wasn't that, that
1:35:07important." But then I remembered
1:35:12District 6, because District 6 is also
1:35:14right around the corner; we are one or
1:35:16two months away from taking the tests
1:35:18for that competition. I think I signed
1:35:20up, actually, I think I signed up for
1:35:22that competition. Hm, I have to check.
1:35:25I think so. So, well, I'm going to go
1:35:29take the tests, and that day we'll do a
1:35:31live stream to see what we thought of
1:35:33the tests. The tests are always cool.
1:35:38The district ones are almost always
1:35:40done by the Libre, right? I think
1:35:42they’ve always done them. I don't
1:35:44remember if the Libre University did
1:35:46the District 5 ones, but I think the
1:35:48Gran Colombiano did them. But I
1:35:50actually quite like the Libre
1:35:51University tests. So, they are, they're
1:35:53interesting. Emerson asks us, when do
1:35:56you think the date for Territorial 11
1:35:58will be? That one is also coming up
1:36:00very soon. I think, for example, we'll
1:36:05take Territorial 11 or District 6, one
1:36:07of the two, and a week or two weeks or
1:36:09maybe three weeks later we'll take the
1:36:11other; I mean, Territorial 11 and
1:36:13District 6 are very close, and I think
1:36:15the tests will be, most likely, in the
1:36:17same month or at most a month apart.
1:36:26What happened with Antioquia 3? Well,
1:36:29Antioquia 3, Territorial Comptroller's
1:36:31Offices, Ministry of Labor, those calls
1:36:34are going super slow. Could it be in
1:36:38July, Daniel asks? It could be, it
1:36:40might be in July. Comptroller's Office
1:36:43exam, October 18th. October 18th is the
1:36:46Comptroller's Office exam. Eh, do you
1:36:51think they'll change it? I don't think
1:36:54so. I think that, I mean, it's the same
1:36:58day as the National University tests,
1:37:00but what I think will happen is that
1:37:01they will change the National
1:37:03University tests. I think they'll
1:37:07postpone them, even if it's just by a
1:37:08week, because here on the calendar we
1:37:13see that the tests eh, where is it?
1:37:18Around here they were scheduled for the
1:37:19same day as the Comptroller's Office.
1:37:23Right, surely during the planning they
1:37:25didn't know that, eh, because nobody
1:37:27knew the Comptroller's schedule anyway,
1:37:28and it turns out they ended up on the
1:37:30same day. They ended up on the same day
1:37:34. So surely they're going to postpone
1:37:36one of them, right? I think this one
1:37:40because it doesn't have, it's not going
1:37:42to have as many registrants, maybe
1:37:44about 20%of the registrants that the
1:37:45Comptroller's Office has. So, surely
1:37:50this is the one they'll postpone. Jair
1:37:54says to us, "For business
1:37:56administrators, is it mandatory to have
1:37:58the professional license?""Yes, it is
1:38:00mandatory, Jair, if you don't have it,
1:38:02I recommend you get it. Eh, I took a
1:38:06while to get mine. I got it after about
1:38:10about 6 months, but the recommendation
1:38:12is that you get it. John says to us,"
1:38:17eh, where can I see my registration for
1:38:19the registrar's office? "I go to the
1:38:21website, but I don't see the option.
1:38:24John, you can see that here. You go to
1:38:27the page and click here on the right
1:38:29where it says list of registrants. You
1:38:33can see the registration there, I mean,
1:38:35you can see this list here. Verify that
1:38:37you have been registered. Enter the
1:38:41registration number the page gave you
1:38:42when you registered. Dani asks," What
1:38:53current open calls are there for
1:38:54registration besides the National
1:38:56University? "" Right now there is only
1:39:00INPEC. And the National University
1:39:04hasn't started yet, I mean, the
1:39:06National University starts on June 16th
1:39:12, so, in a month and a half the
1:39:14registrations begin. It's only for 5
1:39:16days. It's a good competition, honestly
1:39:19. I think this is a good competition
1:39:21because the National University, I feel
1:39:23, pays well. Uh, I don't think it will
1:39:28have that many applicants because the
1:39:29PIN is more expensive. The PIN is more
1:39:32expensive. The exam is cool, but well,
1:39:36it's for certain types of profiles,
1:39:38right? There is something for all
1:39:41profiles. Also, thinking a bit about
1:39:43the future of the National University,
1:39:44well, I don't know how convenient it is
1:39:46. This is also something you have to
1:39:49analyze when applying to an entity. I
1:39:52mean, you should think about how much
1:39:54stability this entity has. Could it be
1:39:57that in the future it, I don't know,
1:39:59disappears? It could happen. It might
1:40:01disappear for some reason. For example,
1:40:04what entities wouldn't disappear? What
1:40:07entities do you think will never
1:40:09disappear? Will all the ministries
1:40:12always be there? For example, an entity
1:40:20that I think will never disappear.
1:40:22Exactly. As Wilson says, the DIAN. I
1:40:25mean, if the DIAN ends, it's the end of
1:40:31the state, because the DIAN collects
1:40:32all the state's resources. The DIAN is
1:40:37a very, very secure entity, but for
1:40:39example, some ministries, I don't know,
1:40:42I'm not really up to date on the
1:40:43ministries. Which are the latest
1:40:48ministries? Let's see. Ah, this is the
1:40:53one for ministries. in Colombia. Hm.
1:41:00Well, the Ministry of the Interior
1:41:02clearly won't disappear either, but
1:41:04well, there may be entities that
1:41:06perhaps aren't so secure. So, thinking
1:41:10about it from that side, it's something
1:41:12you also have to keep in mind. The
1:41:16university, I don't think the National
1:41:18University is such an well, the
1:41:23National University has funding
1:41:25problems, that's the issue. I mean, a
1:41:27large amount of the money, they finance
1:41:29themselves. Natasha asks, "UNAL seems
1:41:33stable, will it really disappear?""I
1:41:35don't think it will disappear. I don't
1:41:37think so, but it will have to undergo
1:41:39some kind of transformation. He says,"
1:41:42The UGPP is on thin ice. "" For example
1:41:45, the UGP, why not? "I'm not really up
1:41:48to date. Because the pension and
1:41:51parafiscal management unit. Well, maybe
1:41:54the Ministry of Equality. Could it be
1:41:56the Ministry of Equality? It could be.
1:41:58It's possible that in 15 or 20 years it
1:42:00might not be here. Or it might have
1:42:03changed its name. It could be.
1:42:06Aerocivil. Hm. Well, I think Aerocivil,
1:42:11yes. Ministry of Sport, no. I think,
1:42:13well, Ministry of Sport, I think it
1:42:15will continue. The Registrar's Office,
1:42:22or the Registrar's Office could be,
1:42:23because the Registrar's Office, if
1:42:25everything starts being done virtually,
1:42:27if they start implementing artificial
1:42:29intelligence systems, it might, I mean,
1:42:31the Registrar's Office might not
1:42:33disappear, but it might be, uh, I don't
1:42:35know, one that doesn't need staff. Well
1:42:45, but I don't know if they are
1:42:46mentioning entities that won't
1:42:48disappear or entities that will
1:42:49disappear. DIAN, they closed it. Well,
1:42:53I don't think it's that easy. Uh,
1:42:57Julian tells us," The Ministry of
1:42:58Equality is already abolished, it's
1:43:00just that the budget and other things
1:43:02have to run out. "Well, I'm not very up
1:43:05to date on those issues, but it could
1:43:06be. Of course, there can be entities
1:43:09that disappear. So you should think
1:43:11about it. The National University isn't
1:43:14going to disappear, but it's an entity
1:43:16that has funding problems, it's an
1:43:17entity that...Well, it's good, I don't
1:43:23know, it's cool. I am a graduate of the
1:43:26National University, I think it's an
1:43:27excellent university, but you shouldn't
1:43:29be oblivious to the problems it has.
1:43:32Maybe thinking 15 to 20 years ahead, it
1:43:34might not be as good an option as
1:43:36others. So, it could still help you get
1:43:40in and later you can obviously continue
1:43:42applying to other entities and maybe go
1:43:44to one that is more stable, more...Yes,
1:43:51with greater certainty that it will
1:43:53continue 50 or 100 years from now. Well
1:43:56, 100 years might be too much, but 50
1:43:58years from now. John says," I don't
1:44:02know what my registration number is for
1:44:03the vacancy at the Registrar's Office.
1:44:06"Where can I find it? If you want, try
1:44:09logging in. I don't know either because
1:44:11honestly, I haven't logged in for a
1:44:12while, but try logging in here. I just
1:44:17don't remember where the...I think in
1:44:21the guides. Let's see, guide for
1:44:24applicant orientation, registrations. I
1:44:27think the page was around here
1:44:29somewhere. It’s this one,
1:44:31concurso2.sesap.edu.com. I'm going to
1:44:35share the link in the chat for you to
1:44:37access it. Log in here with your
1:44:40username and password and perhaps you
1:44:42can find it there. Perhaps you can find
1:44:45it there. Just like Lira John tells us,
1:44:49enter the page with your ID and
1:44:50password and it will appear in large
1:44:52blue letters on the right side. Got it.
1:44:55Thanks, Lira. There you have the
1:44:57step-by-step. Ready. Well, another one
1:45:02I’ve been thinking about lately that
1:45:04I don’t know how much how much of a
1:45:10future it has is—well, of course it
1:45:12has a future, but maybe in the long
1:45:14term, I don’t know, or short term, it
1:45:16might have difficulties—which is the
1:45:18whole issue of schools. The issue of
1:45:22schools, well, the ideal would be for
1:45:24them to start improving quality by
1:45:26reducing the number of students per
1:45:28classroom. I think it would be good to
1:45:32go from having 40 kids in a room to
1:45:33having 30, to having 20, with the same
1:45:35number of teachers. That would clearly
1:45:39improve quality, but we don’t know
1:45:40what decisions will be made. We don’t
1:45:43know what decisions will be made. So,
1:45:48the teacher contest topic, I don’t
1:45:50know, I mean, there is like a lot of
1:45:56uncertainty as well with some things.
1:46:00Pao asks," Were the preliminary results
1:46:02from the registrar's office supposed to
1:46:04come out today? "It was tomorrow, Pao,
1:46:06but they postponed them for two months.
1:46:09So, they come out in the month of July.
1:46:11In the month of July they come out Ah.
1:46:15Well, let’s see. Mm. Let’s see,
1:46:21what other questions are there? Well,
1:46:26well, I don’t know if you have more
1:46:27questions. Let’s look here finally at
1:46:31the hm Well, remember for those who
1:46:36wish to acquire a membership, you can
1:46:38do so here on my channel and on a merit
1:46:40basis. You can also join if you wish,
1:46:43you can follow me, you can subscribe to
1:46:45the channel. Remember that when we
1:46:50reach 50,000 I will re-enable for
1:46:51everyone the artificial intelligence
1:46:53chat to identify the topics we need to
1:46:55study. So, we are very close now. We
1:47:00only have about 8,600 left to reach it.
1:47:06So, anyway, thank you all very much for
1:47:08the support. Also, many thanks to the
1:47:10channel members for supporting these
1:47:12spaces. I hope that later on the other
1:47:15live streams we do will be very useful
1:47:17to you. Eh, also for those who were
1:47:25asking about study material, remember
1:47:27that on my page misión.com, I have a
1:47:29free course, a free course with study
1:47:31material where we have mm eh where we
1:47:40have bibliography and practice tests.
1:47:46Uh, for example, I think I'll also
1:47:47upload today's live stream here. Done.
1:47:51I'll see if I can edit it, just to keep
1:47:53the part about petitions. I would
1:47:56upload the study material for the
1:47:58competitions here, and also in my paid
1:48:00course on strategies to win merit-based
1:48:02competitions. I'm going to start
1:48:06supplementing these two courses, taking
1:48:08into account that we are about to start
1:48:09with the exams. Uh, also for those who
1:48:14wish to purchase my paid course, you
1:48:16have more practice tests here, you have
1:48:18some support videos, and some
1:48:19artificial intelligence tools. Remember
1:48:25that in the free course, I have this
1:48:27study material where there are
1:48:28different documents that can help you
1:48:30study for various competitions. I am
1:48:34going to supplement it with other
1:48:36competitions. For now, we have the
1:48:38Registry, Prosecutor's Office, Dian,
1:48:40and Comptroller's Office. Here are the
1:48:43different thematic axes, and the
1:48:45thematic axes that have practice tests.
1:48:49Here you can click to start, and there
1:48:51are practice tests for different
1:48:53thematic axes. At this moment there are
1:48:5855, well, there are 110 free practice
1:49:00tests you can take. Uh, if you purchase
1:49:05the paid course, you can acquire all
1:49:07four, you can take all four. So, there
1:49:10would be a larger amount. Each one has
1:49:1312 questions, there are more than 13
1:49:15questions you can do. So, I highly
1:49:22recommend that you study, read, and
1:49:23look at these documents depending on
1:49:25the job you are applying for, practice
1:49:27with the tests, and check your
1:49:29knowledge, maybe if if you find any
1:49:35error in the practice test, which can
1:49:37also happen. Uh, practically all exams
1:49:41have errors. I mean, when you take an
1:49:45exam, I always find ambiguous questions
1:49:47. Sometimes the statement has nothing
1:49:50to do with the answers. Sometimes it is
1:49:53not clear what they are asking. So,
1:49:55these are things that can happen. Uh,
1:50:00so keep that in mind for the day you go
1:50:02to take the tests. Well, I think that
1:50:07would be all for today's live stream.
1:50:10The next live stream will be on
1:50:11Wednesday. On Wednesday we are not
1:50:13going to review the information on
1:50:17petitions, or well, not petitions, but
1:50:19customer service. Maybe on Friday or
1:50:22next Monday we will review it. On
1:50:26Wednesday we will see, we will continue
1:50:27reviewing, possibly the National
1:50:29University of Colombia competition, and
1:50:31we will look at the current status of
1:50:33the calls. So, that would be all for
1:50:37today's live stream. Thank you very
1:50:39much for attending. We will see you on
1:50:41Wednesday, for all those who wish to
1:50:43participate. And well, have a good time
1:50:46, rest well, and have a happy evening.
1:50:49Take care.

About this transcript

This page contains the full transcript of Curso GRATIS de Derechos de Petición para GANAR un EMPLEO en los Concursos de Mérito by Misión Mérito, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 14,739 words across 2,244 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.

What you can do with it

Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to choose a caption track available on the video.

Free YouTube transcript tool

YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, caption language selection, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.