YT YouTube2Text

YouTube2Text → Transcripts → КІБЕРПОЛІЦІЯ, ПОЗОВ ДО СУДУ, СТРАЙК НА КАНАЛ. Застереження колегам. Владислав Гришкевич

КІБЕРПОЛІЦІЯ, ПОЗОВ ДО СУДУ, СТРАЙК НА КАНАЛ. Застереження колегам. Владислав Гришкевич — Transcript

by СТРАШНО ЦІКАВО · 5,219 words · 794 segments · language en · Watch on YouTube

Open in transcriber Summarize with AI Download SRT/VTT

Full transcript

0:00Hello everyone, dear listeners. Today I
0:03will tell you a scary, true story that
0:06happened to me. About how I was
0:09threatened with lawsuits and cyber
0:11police, how my channel got a strike,
0:13and how I realized that I am truly
0:15surrounded by a large audience. Because
0:18the likelihood of running into the
0:20person we’ll talk about today grows
0:23when there are really a lot of people
0:25around you. I hope this video will
0:27entertain my regular listeners. And it
0:30will also be useful for narrators,
0:33publishers, literary platforms, and
0:36those who organize contests. I want to
0:40tell you my story and give you a little
0:43warning. So, make yourselves
0:45comfortable and let’s listen to my
0:48story. As you know, in July of this
0:50year, we started the "Potorichchia"
0:52contest on our channel. It involves
0:55writers—young authors or experienced
0:58ones—submitting their works to the
1:01contest. We select the best ones, voice
1:04them, then there’s a vote among
1:06listeners, we choose the winners, and
1:08award them with financial prizes.
1:11Shortly after the contest started, I
1:13think around July 15th, an author by
1:16the name of Vladyslav Hryshkevych
1:18submitted his work. I accepted the work
1:22, and as I usually do, I thanked him
1:24and recommended he subscribe to our
1:27Telegram channel so he wouldn't miss
1:29news, updates about the contest, and so
1:32on. And literally the next day,
1:34Vladyslav Hryshkevych commented on one
1:36of the posts on my Telegram channel.
1:39What the post was about doesn’t
1:40matter, but what matters is the manner
1:42and tone in which Vladyslav began
1:44commenting on that situation I had
1:45written about. He treated that
1:48situation and the authors—
1:50specifically, the author I am working
1:52with—with contempt. He started
1:54arguing with me and trying to prove
1:55something to me. He said that the
1:57author had an inflated ego. He started
1:59making conclusions about a stranger
2:02that were completely unfounded. I got
2:05curious about who this person
2:06commenting was, because many people
2:08write and I can’t remember everyone.
2:10I saw that the nickname looked familiar
2:12. And then I realized that this person
2:13had submitted a work to me for the
2:15contest just yesterday. And it was his
2:16nickname. Well, I became curious about
2:18what kind of person he was. I went to
2:20Google and typed in his name, Vladyslav
2:23Hryshkevych, to see what kind of
2:25interesting character he was. What I
2:29saw there, well, as they say, my ears
2:31curled up. On his social media pages,
2:35he talks about how he worked with the
2:38Arkush platform, which we all know very
2:41well, Booknet, and other publications.
2:45He called Arkush a swamp where
2:47lawlessness and nepotism reign, where
2:49everyone has conspired against talent,
2:51and where talents are pushed out and
2:52blocked. Well, by "talents," he, of
2:55course, means himself. I have been
2:57collaborating with the Arkush platform
2:59for a very long time. I know that the
3:01owner of Arkush serves in the Armed
3:02Forces of Ukraine. I can only say good
3:05things about this platform, exclusively
3:07. And those screenshots that Vladyslav
3:10Hryshkevych posted on his social media
3:12pages, showing how he fights with
3:14everyone, nitpicks everything, and
3:16twists things around. I mean, he brings
3:19negativity upon himself, and then he
3:21accuses people of bullying him when
3:23they respond in the same manner. "They
3:25are bullying me, they are insulting me,
3:27" and all that. I looked at all of this
3:30and wondered what I should do.
3:32Accepting such a person into the
3:34contest threatens bad consequences, as
3:37there could be a lot of problems,
3:39because a contest involves evaluating
3:42work based on a scoring scale and votes
3:45. This person is confrontational; he
3:47might disagree with the scores he was
3:49given. There could be insults,
3:51arguments with other authors, with the
3:54audience, and with us as organizers and
3:56the jury. While I was thinking about
4:00this and consulting with my team on
4:02what to do, a heated discussion was
4:04meanwhile boiling in Telegram. Our
4:06admin Ruslan had already joined in. He
4:09is an active military serviceman. He
4:11tried to calm him down so he would stop
4:14arguing and writing such unpleasant
4:16things. Well, when you go to someone's
4:20house as a guest, please, behave
4:22politely and decently, or don't come at
4:24all; if you don't like anything, why
4:26did you even come here? I am looking at
4:30all of this, and I decide that we are
4:32ending our cooperation with Mr.
4:33Vladyslav right now, because if the
4:35degree of conflict and arguing is this
4:37high already, what will happen next? So
4:41, I write to him that his participation
4:44in the contest is denied. We are not
4:46accepting your work, goodbye. I block
4:49him on Telegram so he won't write to me
4:51anymore, because there is no point in
4:53talking to this person; you tell him
4:55one thing, he twists everything and
4:57says something completely different
4:58back to you. In short, we blocked him,
5:01removed his work from the list, and
5:04went on to mind our own business.
5:07Literally the next day, Vladyslav [
5:10posted] on a platform with a small
5:15number of followers, namely AWS, a
5:17little article about us. You could only
5:21call it an "article" with a huge
5:22stretch, because what he wrote there—
5:24I cannot show you screenshots here,
5:26because that would be a formal pretext
5:28for him to complain to YouTube about
5:30this video to get it deleted, claiming
5:32we are using his written work without
5:34his consent. There is such a loophole
5:36in the YouTube rules, and he could use
5:38it. And so I will not provide
5:40screenshots here, and I certainly
5:41won’t read anything out, because I
5:43find it disgusting to read. All the
5:44original sources are saved in my
5:46Telegram. For those who aren’t on
5:47Telegram, please reach out. If you are
5:49really, well, interested, I will
5:50provide everything to you. He openly
5:54mocked me there, my appearance, my
5:56vision impairment, and even my age. As
5:59if he himself will never be older. He
6:02will be forever young and drunk, as
6:04they say. He mocked our admin Ruslan, a
6:07service member. He mocked his injuries.
6:10Well, in particular, Mr. Ruslan said
6:12that he has a concussion, and he called
6:14him a "concussed one." I will not
6:16repeat that word. In short, if you want
6:18, you can ask me, and I will tell you,
6:20because that article has been deleted
6:22now. But I have saved the screenshots.
6:25There was so much, well, just such
6:27filth and profanity there. It is simply
6:31beyond the pale. Well, how he turned
6:34his rich inner world inside out, and
6:36all his writing talent, if he even has
6:38any, of course, he poured it all out
6:40there. It really came from the soul. On
6:45that Anyos platform, there were later a
6:47few more articles about our contest,
6:49and about everyone, everyone, everyone,
6:51and about the admins, and that we are
6:52all, every one of us, siblings here.
6:55That I am the head toad here, and
6:56everyone around me serves me. Well, in
6:57short, something like that. He made it
6:59up and wrote it all down. It was very
7:02unpleasant. I posted it on Telegram,
7:04and people there were also in shock.
7:08And after some time, we managed to
7:10contact the management of the Anyos
7:12platform. To show them what kind of
7:15lawlessness is actually happening there
7:17. And they deleted this post, well,
7:19forced him to delete it, and changed
7:21their rules. They took certain measures
7:23, but I still consider it insufficient,
7:25because they should have just blocked
7:26him. But that is their business. I
7:29won’t be dictating any advice here.
7:32Well, it seems the story ended; yes, it
7:33was unpleasant, yes, all sorts of
7:35things happen. And it seems like we
7:37forgot about it all and went on living
7:40our lives. Somewhere around September,
7:44I voiced a story by Serhiy Klemin. It
7:46was called "The Package." He wrote it
7:48himself and offered it to me for
7:50voice-over. This is not our first joint
7:52work. We have been collaborating for a
7:53long time. I voice his stories.
7:54Everything between us was, so to speak,
7:56going well. And I voiced this story as
7:59well. It was about a photograph of four
8:02friends, three of whom died in a plane
8:04crash. And well, one remained. He
8:07received this photograph, which was
8:08taken, well, in the last minutes of
8:10their lives, you know, before boarding
8:12the plane. And then all those friends
8:14who had died began to come to life and
8:16step out of the photograph. Well,
8:18it’s a fairly well-known plot; there
8:20are many similar stories in literature
8:22about cameras and photographs from
8:23which some dead people would emerge,
8:25followed by something terrible.
8:27Actually, there are quite a few.
8:28Stephen King alone has several works,
8:31well, on this theme. Many people write
8:33about this. But, well, Mr. Vladyslav,
8:37who previously accused Arkush of
8:39stealing his works, also accused the
8:41platform Booknet of, supposedly,
8:43stealing something from him too. Well,
8:46because there was a story with a
8:47contest on Booknet as well. He
8:50disagreed with the criticism, was
8:51deeply offended that he was criticized,
8:53and believed that they were bad, they
8:55criticized me, they stole my work. And
8:59when he heard this voice-over of mine
9:01for Serhiy Klemin, I am sure that he
9:03was tracking every one of my works and
9:05saw a similarity. Well, because where
9:07else would he even know about it? Only
9:09from my channel. He started accusing me
9:13of stealing his idea, writing a work—
9:16well, Serhiy Klemin wrote it and it was
9:19voiced. He began writing that it was,
9:22how did it sound, some sort of
9:24primitive plagiarism, or something like
9:27that he kept writing. Literally under
9:30every comment he spammed this phrase,
9:31that it was plagiarism, well, under
9:33Serhiy Klemin's video. I blocked him
9:35along with his comments. I just smiled
9:38to myself quietly. I thought, well,
9:40people have different perceptions, what
9:42can you do. But Mr. Vladyslav
9:44Hryshkevych did not stop at writing
9:47comments under my video. He started
9:50writing about the alleged plagiarism on
9:52his social media. It was quite strange
9:55to read all of this. I thought, let the
9:57person write if they want to. That's
9:58what he thinks; well, some people think
9:59they are Napoleon, and some people
10:01think their work was stolen. Well,
10:03there are different, you know,
10:04hallucinations that people have. I
10:06didn't even give it any serious
10:07consideration. I have plenty of other
10:09things to do, lots of work for the
10:10contest, and outside the contest. Well,
10:12in general, there is just no time for
10:15this, for digging into this, so to
10:17speak, unpleasant, brown sludge. But I
10:21wake up in the morning and see an email
10:23from YouTube the next day that a strike
10:25is hitting my channel, that someone,
10:27Vladyslav Hryshkevych, filed a strike
10:29against the channel. A strike is a
10:32copyright complaint, for those who
10:33don't know. And my video by author
10:37Serhiy Klemin was removed from YouTube.
10:41I am just in shock, how is this
10:42possible? How is he not the author? He,
10:45well, cannot prove his authorship. He
10:47shouldn't be able to, at least. I
10:50started looking into what was happening
10:53and what could be done about it. Well,
10:56according to YouTube rules, anyone
10:57running a channel knows about strikes.
11:00First of all, if you get three, the
11:01channel is simply deleted. It’s an
11:04unpleasant situation on its own, even
11:08one is unpleasant, but considering
11:11it’s completely unfair and has no
11:14basis whatsoever. There were two
11:18options: either contact the person who
11:21issued the strike and try to resolve it
11:23peacefully. Well, that was certainly
11:25not our option. That was immediately
11:28off the table. Or, file a so-called
11:30counter-notification. Where you explain
11:34why this strike is not, so to speak,
11:37valid or justified. YouTube reviews
11:39this counter-notification manually, as
11:41far as I understood. And if they deem
11:45it fair, they forward it to the person
11:48who issued the strike, in our case
11:50Hryshkevych, and give them 10 business
11:53days to sue over this whole situation.
11:58Because YouTube itself, like Google,
12:00does not deal with plagiarism cases, as
12:02it is not within their competence to
12:03prove who stole an idea from whom. It
12:06needs to be handled by specially
12:08trained people, so to speak, special
12:09experts. In parallel with this strike,
12:13when I received it, I saw on
12:15Hryshkevych’s page that he was
12:17sending out letters to everyone
12:19literally—publishers, literary groups
12:22, including my partners, people I work
12:24with—claiming that Serhiy Klemin and
12:27the "Strashno Tsikavo" channel are
12:29engaged in plagiarism, distributing
12:32stolen works, counterfeit items, and so
12:34on. It should be said that Hryshkevych
12:38has a secondary legal education and
12:40knows how to draft legal letters. And
12:43at first glance, it might seem that he
12:45is a lawyer. He writes himself that he
12:47is a lawyer, but that is not actually
12:49the case, because having a diploma from
12:51a legal college doesn't make one a
12:52lawyer. That’s right. I later showed
12:56his letters to an acquaintance of mine,
12:58a lawyer and attorney with many years
13:00of experience. He said that every job
13:03has a so-called professional touch,
13:06some kind of experience. You can see
13:08that experience in every piece of work,
13:11nuances that only professionals know.
13:13And Mr. Hryshkevych has zero experience
13:15. Big and round zero. He is just a
13:17student who finished a law college. He
13:21has no work experience as a lawyer, no
13:23practical experience whatsoever. But
13:25people who are not in the loop, who
13:27don't know all these nuances, well,
13:29perhaps it makes a terrifying
13:31impression on some, that you are being
13:33threatened with criminal code articles.
13:36They address you in such formal
13:38language. When I received this strike,
13:40I posted the MP3 version of Serhiy
13:42Klemin's story on Telegram and said
13:43that anyone who hadn't listened yet
13:45could listen there. For now, the video
13:47is deleted, but it will be restored in
13:4910 business days. This angered Mr.
13:52Vladyslav very, very much. He wrote me
13:55an official warning with threats and
13:58ultimatums, demanding that I delete
14:00this work from Telegram and all
14:03platforms under my control, otherwise
14:05he would turn to the cyber police, the
14:08court, and I would have to pay him
14:11moral damages. He gave me 24 hours to
14:14do it. Well, I laughed at it, again,
14:18because, well, what court, what cyber
14:20police, what are you even talking about
14:23? And also, he started writing letters
14:26to all publishers, all my partners, and
14:29my acquaintances, who then contacted me
14:31and said: "Ms. Kateryna, what is this
14:34strange letter that arrived, in which
14:36your name appears?" Well, I explain it
14:39to people, and they also grab their
14:40heads, saying: "Goodness, what is this?
14:42We have never seen anything like this."
14:45Well, I thank Mr. Vladyslav, because
14:47thanks to this situation he created, I
14:49renewed contacts with many people. Our
14:52professional connections have become
14:54stronger, I believe. This is, well, a
14:57bit of a bonus. I filed a
14:59counter-notification according to
15:01YouTube's rules. The basis of this
15:05appeal was the fact that Serhiy
15:07Klemin's work "The Parcel" was written
15:09before Vladyslav Hryshkevych's work "
15:12Polaroid." I turned to Serhiy Klemin,
15:16because he was also publicly accusing
15:18him, writing libel about him, and
15:20telling everyone that he was a pirate
15:22and a plagiarist. And Mr. Klemin sent
15:26me a link from January 19, 2026,
15:28meaning half a year before
15:30Hryshkevych's story appeared, Mr.
15:32Serhiy Klemin had posted it on the
15:35Blogger portal. Well, it's a portal
15:38from Google where you can create your
15:39own blogs and write your own posts
15:40there. It was in a slightly different
15:43edition, but it was still the story I
15:45had narrated. Well, it's obvious. You
15:47don't need to be an expert to
15:48understand that the story "The Parcel"
15:50was created half a year earlier than
15:52the story "Polaroid." Well, Mr. Serhiy
15:55also said that he has several friends
15:57and acquaintances who are witnesses and
15:59will confirm that they read the story "
16:01The Parcel" back in the winter of last
16:03year, at a time when no one had even
16:06heard of Vladyslav Hryshkevych. In my
16:09counter-notification to YouTube, I
16:11included this link and pointed out that
16:13it was published on January 19th, which
16:15is six months before Vladislav
16:16Grishkevich's story appeared. Therefore
16:19, Grishkevich cannot claim that we
16:21stole anything from him, because his
16:23work appeared later. By the way, he
16:25himself wrote that his story "Polaroid"
16:27was created specifically for the "
16:29Scarily Interesting" contest. And the "
16:32Scarily Interesting" contest started in
16:34July of '26, which is half a year later
16:36than when the post was published. So,
16:39it just doesn't add up. Not at all. I
16:41submitted this counter-appeal. It only
16:44went through on the third try, because
16:46YouTube, well, they don't always review
16:47them. To write such appeals so that
16:50they are successful. Even if you know
16:52you are right, you need to completely
16:54turn off your emotions and stick to
16:56facts, facts, dry facts. Otherwise, you
16:59might have problems, like I did, when
17:00they didn't even accept it the first
17:02time. But that’s another story. At
17:05the same time, while I was dealing with
17:06this appeal, while I was wasting my
17:08nerves, time, and energy on it instead
17:10of working on the channel, Mr. Serhiy
17:12Klemin was trying to talk to Vladislav
17:13Grishkevich to prove to him that his
17:15work was written earlier. He wrote him
17:19very polite letters, showing the HTML
17:22code of the page on Blogger, where it
17:24was visible—well, in the page code
17:27it's visible—that it was published in
17:30January '26. Well, he provided all
17:33kinds of technical proof that his work
17:34had been published earlier. And instead
17:38of admitting he was wrong or trying to
17:40engage in any kind of constructive
17:43dialogue, Vladislav Grishkevich
17:44publicly stated on his Facebook that we
17:47had falsified and forged the
17:49publication date of the post, and that
17:51it was actually published later. Bravo!
17:56But that’s not all he did. His next
18:00step was an attempt to remove the work
18:03published on the Blogger platform that
18:07belongs to Serhiy Klemin. He sent in
18:10that same little "piece of junk"
18:13complaint of his. I can't call it
18:15anything else, claiming that we had
18:17allegedly plagiarized him. I mean, he
18:19found arguments for why he even
18:21considered it plagiarism. He found, I
18:25think, six or eight similar plot points
18:28—that supposedly both his story and
18:31Klemin's are about a photograph, and
18:34both use the motif of a sick relative,
18:37only there it was a mother and here it
18:40was a wife. He found eight generally
18:43accepted plot tropes that are used in
18:45literature. Well, many authors use
18:48those. That cannot be considered
18:49plagiarism, because we all read things
18:51in our lives. Something influences us,
18:54our worldviews. And, well, this is not
18:57plagiarism, because in Clemin's work
18:59the events took place in an American
19:01setting, while in Hryshkevych's, they
19:03were here in Ukraine. Well, it's all
19:05completely different; yes, there are
19:07some similarities, of course, but there
19:09is much more that is different. And the
19:12most interesting thing is that this
19:14post, with which he supposedly proved
19:17that we stole his story, was a text he
19:19most likely generated in ChatGPT by
19:22giving it such a task: "Here we have
19:24two works. One is mine, and one is not.
19:28Prove that my work was stolen." And if
19:31you give ChatGPT such a task, it will,
19:33of course, play along with you. It will
19:36find you 28 common features because its
19:38task is to play along and flatter the
19:40person. Well, I work with it a lot
19:43myself. And everyone who works with
19:45ChatGPT asks it questions and
19:47communicates with it. Well, you
19:49probably know that if you give it the
19:51task: "Oh, find evidence that I was
19:53stolen from," well, it will find it.
19:57For fun, my team and I even gave it the
19:59task of finding commonalities between a
20:02fan and a human heart. And imagine, it
20:06found them; there were such twists that
20:08the human brain wouldn't even think of.
20:10These are just generated common
20:12features that don't prove the existence
20:15of plagiarism at all. But,
20:17unfortunately, he fed this, well, this
20:20artificial text written by a robot. He
20:24fed it to another robot built into
20:26YouTube, the same one built into Google
20:28. And this robot, of course, swallowed
20:31it and decided that we had plagiarized
20:34his work. Well, I don't see any other
20:36explanation. This is not an expert
20:39opinion. And the fact that he wrote
20:42there that it's a verdict from Google,
20:44that even Google admitted my work was
20:46plagiarized. That is proof. That is not
20:48proof at all. It's just that the robot
20:50made a mistake. Robots often make
20:52mistakes. This happens everywhere all
20:54the time. Well, there is a lot of it.
20:57And when I personally wrote the appeal,
20:59a person must have read it there and
21:01seen it, because they didn't accept it
21:03the first time; they were asking me
21:05some clarifying questions. And the
21:08person realized that there was no
21:10plagiarism, that the video was actually
21:12published six months earlier, and that
21:14closes all questions. And, of course,
21:17the strike on my channel was,
21:18fortunately, removed. And, well, the
21:22ten-day period began, which was granted
21:24to Mr. Hryshkevych to file a lawsuit,
21:26well, and provide proof of the legal
21:28action. If he had provided them, well,
21:30my video wouldn't have been deleted and
21:32the strike on the channel would have
21:33been reversed. But, of course, he has
21:35nothing to take to court. These aren't
21:37proofs; they are, well, so to speak,
21:40simply ridiculous. 10 days have passed,
21:44today my video was restored, and I
21:47didn't see any evidence for a court
21:49case. Instead, I saw massive defamation
21:53from Mr. Hryshkevych. He, well, damaged
21:56my reputation, and damaged Serhiy
21:58Klemin's reputation. He called everyone
22:02who supported Serhiy Klemin and me the
22:04worst names because Serhiy wrote a post
22:06on Facebook where he, well, shared his
22:08view on this situation. People
22:10supported him, and Mr. Hryshkevych
22:13screenshotted it all and posted it on
22:15his own page. As if a campaign of
22:17harassment had started against him.
22:20That he’s being bullied, that he’s
22:22being insulted. Well, once again, this
22:24same old song, our song is good and new
22:27, let's start it all over: if you can't
22:29, well, somehow refute the evidence,
22:31you start playing the victim, claiming
22:33everyone around is bad. He has used
22:35this not once, not twice, and not three
22:38times. Well, this scenario is getting a
22:40bit tiresome. I want him to change the
22:42record a little, well, to start
22:44learning something. I thought for a
22:46long time whether or not to tell you
22:49this story. Well, because, as they say,
22:52don't stir the pot and it won't stink.
22:55I know that after this video, there
22:57will be 500 more episodes on his
22:59Facebook page about me—how bad I am,
23:01how old and cross-eyed I am, whatever
23:03else he’s said about me and everyone
23:05around me. I know it will happen. Well,
23:08he’s only giving himself bad
23:09publicity with this. If he still hasn't
23:11realized this and it hasn't dawned on
23:12him yet, then let me give you a hint.
23:15You are giving yourself bad publicity;
23:17no one will work with you, and they
23:20already aren't. Not because you're so
23:22talented, exceptional, and everyone is
23:24afraid of your competition, but because
23:26people go to your page, see all this,
23:28and don't want to get involved with you
23:30. Well, just a little hint, don't
23:33mention it. Well, just so you
23:35understand the level of cynicism and
23:38such insolence. Well, I can't even find
23:41the words for this person. Well, now he
23:44is trying, well, so to speak, to become
23:46famous, to push his name using war
23:48topics. He writes stories about the war
23:51, such touching, tear-jerking ones.
23:54Well, or ChatGPT writes them for him: "
23:55There are different options." I mean,
23:57he insulted our soldier, calling him
24:00the worst names. There is proof of this
24:02. And then he writes little stories
24:07about the war to touch people's hearts,
24:10to, so to speak, sway them so they’d
24:13sympathize with him or take his side. "
24:17Look how good I am, I write about
24:18soldiers, about the war, about how
24:20terrible it all is." In other words,
24:24it's a cheap manipulation of a painful
24:27topic that resonates with many people,
24:30while he himself calls soldiers names
24:33and mocks their trauma. Again, I have
24:37all the proof. I just don't want to
24:38publish it here. I repeat, I can
24:41forgive and understand many things in
24:43life, but what I hate most in people is
24:45hypocrisy. When you pretend to be
24:49something you're not at all, it's
24:51always infuriated and disgusted me,
24:53ever since I was a child. Well, right
24:57now, unfortunately, many people use the
25:00topic of war and patriotism to somehow
25:02whitewash themselves. And it works very
25:06well because everyone is traumatized
25:08and emotional. Everyone has various
25:11traumas from the war, and yet there are
25:13scumbags who take advantage of this,
25:15writing little stories about the war
25:17while calling soldiers the worst names.
25:20And when I see this person submitting
25:22stories about the war, or stray animals
25:24, or whatever else he dreams up to
25:26contests, well, you don't even need to
25:28think. You just throw a prompt into
25:31ChatGPT: "Come up with 10 heartbreaking
25:33topics so people will cry." And it will
25:36come up with them, and it will do a
25:37decent job. And it will seem like you
25:39came up with it and lived through it
25:41yourself. He's using this right now.
25:44And that is why I urge you to share
25:46this video as widely as possible,
25:49everywhere you can, so that people know
25:51what is really inside this person and
25:54what is behind his tear-jerking war
25:56stories. I am recording this video
26:00because the problem is actually much
26:02broader than just this story. Well,
26:05first of all, it lies in the fact that
26:07I want to warn people against working
26:09with this individual. He will create
26:12problems for you. He has created
26:14problems and scandals for others, not
26:16just me. There were many other
26:19situations where he tried to submit his
26:22work somewhere. Something wouldn't
26:25please him, and then everyone else was
26:26the villain. But even that is not the
26:29most important problem I see in this
26:31situation. The next problem is a
26:34massive loophole. I believe it's a
26:38loophole, a flaw in YouTube, that you
26:40can get offended by a channel, generate
26:43some nonsense, fabricate plagiarism
26:46accusations, and file it as a copyright
26:48strike against a channel. I’ve looked
26:51it up, and such cases exist. I am not
26:53the only one who has suffered like this
26:55. There are other channels that have
26:57had, well, strikes manufactured against
26:59them specifically for various reasons.
27:01Whether it's some kind of haters or who
27:02knows who. And so I am addressing those
27:05who have YouTube channels, especially
27:07popular ones. Be careful, because when
27:10you work with a large number of people,
27:13when a large audience gathers around
27:15you, of course, the probability
27:16increases that some bad person will be
27:19found who, for one reason or another,
27:21wants to harm you. And to make sure
27:24they don't take advantage of this
27:25loophole that, unfortunately, exists on
27:27YouTube. Yes, you will beat the strike,
27:30but it will cost you nerves, time, and
27:33resources that you would prefer to
27:36direct toward something more useful and
27:39necessary. But unfortunately, you have
27:42to spend it proving that you're
27:44innocent, writing these appeals, these
27:46letters, and enduring this endless
27:48correspondence, because on YouTube, it
27:50is very difficult to reach a real
27:52person. Everything there is automated,
27:55everything happens through these chains
27:58. Well, it's difficult. But the
28:00procedure provided for false strikes
28:03does exist, even if it is unpleasant.
28:05Still, I think we somehow need to
28:08protect ourselves from this, be
28:10cautious, and at least know that such
28:12things are possible. I am telling you
28:15this story, dear colleagues, so that
28:16you know how things can happen. And
28:19finally, I would like to end with a
28:22rhetorical thought that when a person
28:24with a not-quite-healthy psyche—I'm
28:27not a psychiatrist, but people who saw
28:30this behavior were unanimous in saying
28:32that something is not right there. And
28:36when you give such a person freedom or
28:39any influence, well, firstly, a Putin
28:41can grow out of such a person. Let's be
28:44honest, he probably also once imagined
28:46something in his head, that Ukraine
28:48doesn't exist and that Lenin invented
28:51it, and started a little war. I think
28:54that, fortunately, Grishkevich does not
28:56have such influence, so to speak, or
28:59such opportunities, because most likely
29:01he doesn't even work; a person who has
29:03a job simply doesn't have the time to
29:06engage in such nonsense. But he thinks
29:09he is a writer, a great artist, a
29:12lawyer. He wants to stroke his ego so
29:14that it grows. In what way? Well, by
29:17saying that I was stolen from. Look at
29:19what a scandal, how they dared. They
29:22stole from someone as talented as me.
29:24And he looks, and this post of his was
29:27read not by five people as usual, but
29:29by ten. Quite the "successful success."
29:32That's it. Then let's do it again.
29:34Stolen again, stolen again. He’s just
29:36so talented, and they keep stealing
29:37from him. Yes, everyone. Because they
29:39can’t do anything themselves, they
29:40only steal from him. I suggest changing
29:42the record, because this is becoming
29:44uninteresting and predictable. But I,
29:47well, I would like to end with a
29:49different thought. If you give such
29:52people a free internet, a sense of
29:55impunity to do whatever they want
29:58online, well, it can create these kinds
30:01of problems. Of course, it’s good
30:03that he doesn’t walk the streets
30:05attacking people, but instead does his
30:06nasty deeds online. Well, better that
30:08than if he were walking about. But
30:10still, it is unpleasant. And I
30:12emphasize once again: be careful. All
30:14of you who collaborate with him, or
30:16might collaborate. Be careful. I ask
30:20you to share this video on social media
30:22, distribute it as much as possible so
30:25it reaches the largest number of
30:27writers, owners of literary platforms,
30:30those who organize contests, various
30:32activities, and so on. YouTube
30:35narrators. Again, please, I am begging
30:37you, do not take his works for
30:39voiceovers. You’ll record it, he
30:41won't like something, he’ll hit you
30:43with a strike, and you won’t be able
30:45to prove he gave you permission,
30:47because proving that legally is really
30:49difficult. A screenshot of him giving
30:51you something—that is not proof, by
30:53the way. Actually, that is the reason I
30:55turned him down back in the day,
30:57because I considered the possibility
30:59that if he didn't like something, he
31:01would complain about me later. But I
31:02could never have imagined that I would
31:04turn him down and he would still hit me
31:06with a strike. Well, that was simply
31:08beyond my wildest imagination. So
31:12that’s your bedtime story for the
31:13night. I wish for you to never
31:16encounter such people. Be careful. I
31:20hope that this is the last such case.
31:23The first and last such case in my
31:26career. Take care of yourselves. Yeah.

About this transcript

This page contains the full transcript of КІБЕРПОЛІЦІЯ, ПОЗОВ ДО СУДУ, СТРАЙК НА КАНАЛ. Застереження колегам. Владислав Гришкевич by СТРАШНО ЦІКАВО, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 5,219 words across 794 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.

What you can do with it

Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.

Free YouTube transcript tool

YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.