YouTube2Text

Corporate Misconduct: Erika Cheung on Her Experience Reporting Problems at Theranos — Transcript

by TepperCMU · 1,309 words · 190 segments · language en · Watch on YouTube

Full transcript

  1. 0:04and I think when I was at theranos it
  2. 0:07was basically looking at the way in
  3. 0:09which we were sitting in our r d
  4. 0:11meetings and trying to vet okay what is
  5. 0:15the accuracy of this test and how does
  6. 0:18it compare to all of these other
  7. 0:21internal studies that we're doing and
  8. 0:23when we were generating the results for
  9. 0:26the accuracy essentially it would be six
  10. 0:28different numbers that you would have to
  11. 0:30pull together and what I was noticing is
  12. 0:33that they were going in and saying oh
  13. 0:36the accuracy didn't hit five let's take
  14. 0:39these six numbers start deleting
  15. 0:41outliers in order to get closer to five
  16. 0:45because we're at 12. and so this was
  17. 0:47like well what is this this is strange
  18. 0:50like what is this outlier deletion
  19. 0:52process because it just doesn't seem to
  20. 0:53make sense to me what the logic and the
  21. 0:56rationale between what you decide to
  22. 0:58delete and what you don't delete and if
  23. 1:01anyone has any sort of scientific
  24. 1:03training the number one thing they teach
  25. 1:05you is you just keep all the data and
  26. 1:09once you have all the data you can kind
  27. 1:11of discern what kind of patterns are we
  28. 1:13seeing what's actually going on here and
  29. 1:16so this act of this outlier deletion was
  30. 1:19that curious of like am I missing
  31. 1:21something here what what's kind of going
  32. 1:22on what is this process and I remember
  33. 1:24going to so many different people like
  34. 1:26can someone just give me an sop about
  35. 1:28how you do outlier deletion because it
  36. 1:30just seems like they're making this up
  37. 1:32and people are like oh well if it's high
  38. 1:35here and it's low here and you compare
  39. 1:37it and no one could could ever give me a
  40. 1:38good answer on what that actual
  41. 1:42framework they were using for this out
  42. 1:44tired outlier deletion was and what I
  43. 1:47started to notice is because they were
  44. 1:49engaging in this practice when I would
  45. 1:52then go on to test patient samples
  46. 1:55essentially prior to running a patient
  47. 1:57sample you run these things called
  48. 1:58quality controls so it's a sample you
  49. 2:01run where again you know the
  50. 2:03concentration is supposed to equal 12.
  51. 2:04and whenever I'd run it through the
  52. 2:07device it'd come out like 54 or
  53. 2:09something
  54. 2:10so then I was like oh okay
  55. 2:12it's now at the point that our whole
  56. 2:14machine has been been developed on data
  57. 2:17that's been manipulated so now when
  58. 2:20we're actually running the patient
  59. 2:21samples on these machines is generating
  60. 2:24the false result and it's not coming out
  61. 2:27the right way so then again I was
  62. 2:29curious like okay uh where's the problem
  63. 2:32then because now I have this machine
  64. 2:34that's supposed to tell me that this
  65. 2:36equals 12 and it equals 42. so where did
  66. 2:39we go wrong where are the problems and
  67. 2:42so I had spent a lot of time trying to
  68. 2:44investigate internally in the
  69. 2:46organization where where is this problem
  70. 2:48is it the chemistry is it the device is
  71. 2:51it I'm incompetent like why could it be
  72. 2:54what could it be because at the end of
  73. 2:56the day the one thing I know is that 12
  74. 2:58does not equal 42 and there's no way
  75. 3:02there's no way that that anyone's going
  76. 3:04to convince me of that so so that was a
  77. 3:06point of just running these different
  78. 3:08experiments of this one simple this one
  79. 3:11simple idea of like I know 12 equals 12.
  80. 3:13why is it not equaling 12 in this case
  81. 3:16how can we sort of figure out what's
  82. 3:19kind of going on there and I think my
  83. 3:21curiosity was I was talking to Taya
  84. 3:24about this was quite innocent you know I
  85. 3:25I thought that everyone in the
  86. 3:27organization was just like me just
  87. 3:29trying to make this machine work was
  88. 3:31trying to make the company viable was
  89. 3:33trying to ensure that we could test
  90. 3:34patients and it produce high quality
  91. 3:37results but
  92. 3:40that started to shift the more and more
  93. 3:43I'd bring up these instances up to
  94. 3:45people and I'd watch people try and
  95. 3:49basically sabotage the fact that I was
  96. 3:51creating error report sheets and we were
  97. 3:54seeing so many errors and they would
  98. 3:55like take them down from the machines to
  99. 3:58sort of hide the fact that these issues
  100. 4:00were happening as frequently as they
  101. 4:01were was getting pushback when I talked
  102. 4:04to uh different leaders of saying you
  103. 4:10know oh it's a statistical error that
  104. 4:13something in our programming that's why
  105. 4:15it's generating this you're not you're
  106. 4:17not running essentially these different
  107. 4:19analyzes the correct way that's why
  108. 4:21you're getting the false result and so
  109. 4:24from there of just this accumulation of
  110. 4:26data the fact that I was starting to get
  111. 4:28push back the fact that I kept raising
  112. 4:30the alarm Higher and Higher and instead
  113. 4:32of people saying like oh this is a
  114. 4:35problem let's see what we can do about
  115. 4:36this or oh this has severe consequences
  116. 4:39this means that there are issues in
  117. 4:41terms of how we generate patient samples
  118. 4:43maybe we should pull these tests
  119. 4:47um kind of that that that transition
  120. 4:51started to happen when it was like you
  121. 4:53couldn't fight the evidence anymore that
  122. 4:56if things weren't working and no one was
  123. 4:58doing anything about it I was really
  124. 5:00committed to wanting to work on a
  125. 5:02problem like that and so for me even
  126. 5:05though I was headed up against
  127. 5:07opposition of different people
  128. 5:09internally organization that
  129. 5:12responsibility to even that Vision was
  130. 5:15still so strong of wanting to provide
  131. 5:18good health care for people of seeing
  132. 5:20that as a genuine need of something that
  133. 5:23people we needed to work on in society
  134. 5:26and so in terms of going forward and
  135. 5:30hitting that opposition and recognizing
  136. 5:32or dealing with all these different
  137. 5:33personalities you know different
  138. 5:35emotions different identities people
  139. 5:36have different agendas and priorities to
  140. 5:39me it was just that grounding in I'm
  141. 5:43responsible to my patients if this was
  142. 5:46my sister if this was my family member
  143. 5:48if this was a friend anyone I would
  144. 5:53lose it right I'd be so angry that
  145. 5:55someone would Express that level of
  146. 5:59negligence over something as precious as
  147. 6:01their health status and the implications
  148. 6:03that could have on the drugs that they
  149. 6:05take on the diagnosis that they have on
  150. 6:07even just the anxiety of did I get a
  151. 6:09misdiagnosis and now I think you know
  152. 6:12I'm not going to be able to have
  153. 6:13children when I actually am which did
  154. 6:16happen several times with all these
  155. 6:17testosterone tests that they were giving
  156. 6:19to young women actually in our
  157. 6:21organization where all of them thought
  158. 6:22that they had some sort of
  159. 6:24um
  160. 6:25hormonal disorder
  161. 6:27so that made it
  162. 6:31in a way it's hard to explain it's like
  163. 6:33that made it easy even when the
  164. 6:35adversity of speaking forward or the
  165. 6:38adversity of all the pressures around me
  166. 6:40became so difficult to manage
  167. 6:43that that whatever that is that sense of
  168. 6:47responsibility that knowingness of
  169. 6:49someone else's experience and just
  170. 6:52putting myself in the shoes of those
  171. 6:54individuals made it easy to actually
  172. 6:59say something like the act of saying
  173. 7:01something is not hard it is not hard at
  174. 7:04all it is it is the pressure sort of
  175. 7:08surrounding that the personality sort of
  176. 7:09surrounding that that kind of made it
  177. 7:11difficult but like at the end of the day
  178. 7:13this wasn't personal this was very we
  179. 7:16have a job to do
  180. 7:18uh we're supposed to provide high
  181. 7:20quality Diagnostics like I think I have
  182. 7:23a fair standard as anyone would have a
  183. 7:25fair standard on what quality means in
  184. 7:27that context
  185. 7:29and we're not hitting that and what are
  186. 7:31we going to do about it and that was
  187. 7:33probably
  188. 7:36the simple message that I kind of
  189. 7:39carried even though the pressures were
  190. 7:41quite High

About this transcript

This page contains the full transcript of Corporate Misconduct: Erika Cheung on Her Experience Reporting Problems at Theranos by TepperCMU, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 1,309 words across 190 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.

What you can do with it

Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.

Free YouTube transcript tool

YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.