Corporate Misconduct: Erika Cheung on Her Experience Reporting Problems at Theranos — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:04and I think when I was at theranos it
- 0:07was basically looking at the way in
- 0:09which we were sitting in our r d
- 0:11meetings and trying to vet okay what is
- 0:15the accuracy of this test and how does
- 0:18it compare to all of these other
- 0:21internal studies that we're doing and
- 0:23when we were generating the results for
- 0:26the accuracy essentially it would be six
- 0:28different numbers that you would have to
- 0:30pull together and what I was noticing is
- 0:33that they were going in and saying oh
- 0:36the accuracy didn't hit five let's take
- 0:39these six numbers start deleting
- 0:41outliers in order to get closer to five
- 0:45because we're at 12. and so this was
- 0:47like well what is this this is strange
- 0:50like what is this outlier deletion
- 0:52process because it just doesn't seem to
- 0:53make sense to me what the logic and the
- 0:56rationale between what you decide to
- 0:58delete and what you don't delete and if
- 1:01anyone has any sort of scientific
- 1:03training the number one thing they teach
- 1:05you is you just keep all the data and
- 1:09once you have all the data you can kind
- 1:11of discern what kind of patterns are we
- 1:13seeing what's actually going on here and
- 1:16so this act of this outlier deletion was
- 1:19that curious of like am I missing
- 1:21something here what what's kind of going
- 1:22on what is this process and I remember
- 1:24going to so many different people like
- 1:26can someone just give me an sop about
- 1:28how you do outlier deletion because it
- 1:30just seems like they're making this up
- 1:32and people are like oh well if it's high
- 1:35here and it's low here and you compare
- 1:37it and no one could could ever give me a
- 1:38good answer on what that actual
- 1:42framework they were using for this out
- 1:44tired outlier deletion was and what I
- 1:47started to notice is because they were
- 1:49engaging in this practice when I would
- 1:52then go on to test patient samples
- 1:55essentially prior to running a patient
- 1:57sample you run these things called
- 1:58quality controls so it's a sample you
- 2:01run where again you know the
- 2:03concentration is supposed to equal 12.
- 2:04and whenever I'd run it through the
- 2:07device it'd come out like 54 or
- 2:09something
- 2:10so then I was like oh okay
- 2:12it's now at the point that our whole
- 2:14machine has been been developed on data
- 2:17that's been manipulated so now when
- 2:20we're actually running the patient
- 2:21samples on these machines is generating
- 2:24the false result and it's not coming out
- 2:27the right way so then again I was
- 2:29curious like okay uh where's the problem
- 2:32then because now I have this machine
- 2:34that's supposed to tell me that this
- 2:36equals 12 and it equals 42. so where did
- 2:39we go wrong where are the problems and
- 2:42so I had spent a lot of time trying to
- 2:44investigate internally in the
- 2:46organization where where is this problem
- 2:48is it the chemistry is it the device is
- 2:51it I'm incompetent like why could it be
- 2:54what could it be because at the end of
- 2:56the day the one thing I know is that 12
- 2:58does not equal 42 and there's no way
- 3:02there's no way that that anyone's going
- 3:04to convince me of that so so that was a
- 3:06point of just running these different
- 3:08experiments of this one simple this one
- 3:11simple idea of like I know 12 equals 12.
- 3:13why is it not equaling 12 in this case
- 3:16how can we sort of figure out what's
- 3:19kind of going on there and I think my
- 3:21curiosity was I was talking to Taya
- 3:24about this was quite innocent you know I
- 3:25I thought that everyone in the
- 3:27organization was just like me just
- 3:29trying to make this machine work was
- 3:31trying to make the company viable was
- 3:33trying to ensure that we could test
- 3:34patients and it produce high quality
- 3:37results but
- 3:40that started to shift the more and more
- 3:43I'd bring up these instances up to
- 3:45people and I'd watch people try and
- 3:49basically sabotage the fact that I was
- 3:51creating error report sheets and we were
- 3:54seeing so many errors and they would
- 3:55like take them down from the machines to
- 3:58sort of hide the fact that these issues
- 4:00were happening as frequently as they
- 4:01were was getting pushback when I talked
- 4:04to uh different leaders of saying you
- 4:10know oh it's a statistical error that
- 4:13something in our programming that's why
- 4:15it's generating this you're not you're
- 4:17not running essentially these different
- 4:19analyzes the correct way that's why
- 4:21you're getting the false result and so
- 4:24from there of just this accumulation of
- 4:26data the fact that I was starting to get
- 4:28push back the fact that I kept raising
- 4:30the alarm Higher and Higher and instead
- 4:32of people saying like oh this is a
- 4:35problem let's see what we can do about
- 4:36this or oh this has severe consequences
- 4:39this means that there are issues in
- 4:41terms of how we generate patient samples
- 4:43maybe we should pull these tests
- 4:47um kind of that that that transition
- 4:51started to happen when it was like you
- 4:53couldn't fight the evidence anymore that
- 4:56if things weren't working and no one was
- 4:58doing anything about it I was really
- 5:00committed to wanting to work on a
- 5:02problem like that and so for me even
- 5:05though I was headed up against
- 5:07opposition of different people
- 5:09internally organization that
- 5:12responsibility to even that Vision was
- 5:15still so strong of wanting to provide
- 5:18good health care for people of seeing
- 5:20that as a genuine need of something that
- 5:23people we needed to work on in society
- 5:26and so in terms of going forward and
- 5:30hitting that opposition and recognizing
- 5:32or dealing with all these different
- 5:33personalities you know different
- 5:35emotions different identities people
- 5:36have different agendas and priorities to
- 5:39me it was just that grounding in I'm
- 5:43responsible to my patients if this was
- 5:46my sister if this was my family member
- 5:48if this was a friend anyone I would
- 5:53lose it right I'd be so angry that
- 5:55someone would Express that level of
- 5:59negligence over something as precious as
- 6:01their health status and the implications
- 6:03that could have on the drugs that they
- 6:05take on the diagnosis that they have on
- 6:07even just the anxiety of did I get a
- 6:09misdiagnosis and now I think you know
- 6:12I'm not going to be able to have
- 6:13children when I actually am which did
- 6:16happen several times with all these
- 6:17testosterone tests that they were giving
- 6:19to young women actually in our
- 6:21organization where all of them thought
- 6:22that they had some sort of
- 6:24um
- 6:25hormonal disorder
- 6:27so that made it
- 6:31in a way it's hard to explain it's like
- 6:33that made it easy even when the
- 6:35adversity of speaking forward or the
- 6:38adversity of all the pressures around me
- 6:40became so difficult to manage
- 6:43that that whatever that is that sense of
- 6:47responsibility that knowingness of
- 6:49someone else's experience and just
- 6:52putting myself in the shoes of those
- 6:54individuals made it easy to actually
- 6:59say something like the act of saying
- 7:01something is not hard it is not hard at
- 7:04all it is it is the pressure sort of
- 7:08surrounding that the personality sort of
- 7:09surrounding that that kind of made it
- 7:11difficult but like at the end of the day
- 7:13this wasn't personal this was very we
- 7:16have a job to do
- 7:18uh we're supposed to provide high
- 7:20quality Diagnostics like I think I have
- 7:23a fair standard as anyone would have a
- 7:25fair standard on what quality means in
- 7:27that context
- 7:29and we're not hitting that and what are
- 7:31we going to do about it and that was
- 7:33probably
- 7:36the simple message that I kind of
- 7:39carried even though the pressures were
- 7:41quite High
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of Corporate Misconduct: Erika Cheung on Her Experience Reporting Problems at Theranos by TepperCMU, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 1,309 words across 190 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.