China Is About To Pop The AI Bubble — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00So the whole US stock market including
- 0:02your 401k, your index funds and the
- 0:04value of your retirement is based on a
- 0:07story that might be coming to an end.
- 0:09>> You mentioned earlier the dot bubble.
- 0:11Are we doing bubble 2.0 right now?
- 0:14>> Oh, this is much bigger. The AI the AI
- 0:18buildout relative to the TMT buildout of
- 0:20992000 is multiples even as a percent of
- 0:24the economy.
- 0:25>> Okay. So, one of the big reasons why the
- 0:28stock market is being held up right now
- 0:30is because there's a story that American
- 0:32companies are going to make trillions of
- 0:34dollars in profits forever because the
- 0:37world will be forced to use America's
- 0:39technology.
- 0:40>> You have a lot of data that you look at.
- 0:42Do you think China is getting better at
- 0:44AI? How is the
- 0:46>> two there are two relevant tech centers
- 0:47on two and a half America, China,
- 0:49Israel. Those are the tech centers of
- 0:51the world. They will win or we will win.
- 0:54Now, some people say that that story is
- 0:56coming to an end because of all the
- 0:58lies, the spending, and the competition.
- 1:01Now, on June 12th, something interesting
- 1:03happened. A letter was sent to a company
- 1:05in San Francisco. That letter was from
- 1:08Howard Lutnik, the commerce secretary of
- 1:10the United States. And by the end of the
- 1:11night, the most advanced AI in the
- 1:14world, was shut down. Andropic, which is
- 1:17the company behind Claude, was ordered
- 1:19to cut off two of its most powerful AI
- 1:23models from every foreign national in
- 1:26the world, not just China, by the way.
- 1:28That order included countries like
- 1:30France, Germany, Japan, and even
- 1:33anthropics employees. If they weren't
- 1:36American citizens, they were also locked
- 1:38out. Now, 4 days after that letter,
- 1:41France fires Palunteer. The French prime
- 1:44minister said that we can't depend on
- 1:46partners who are capable of turning off
- 1:48the tap. But Germany already walked
- 1:50away. Spain told its companies to stop
- 1:53signing deals. The same goes for
- 1:55Britain. And it's because the world
- 1:58found out that it has a choice. And the
- 2:01choice is literally 7 and 12 times
- 2:04cheaper. Cuz while America is spending
- 2:06$1 trillion a year building AI, which is
- 2:093% of the whole US economy, China is
- 2:13spending a fraction of that and giving
- 2:16it away virtually for free. So in this
- 2:19video, I want to explain how China is
- 2:21competing with the US and how this AI
- 2:24story might be coming to an end and some
- 2:26of the things that you can use to
- 2:28potentially see this bubble popping
- 2:30before anybody else. So with that said,
- 2:32let's get into it. Hi, my name is Henri
- 2:34Jick. Hope you're doing well. Come for
- 2:36the finance and stay for the AI bubble
- 2:38everyone saw coming. So, let me just
- 2:40start with a basic question. Do people
- 2:42really want this AI technology? Because
- 2:45there's a theory that says the reason
- 2:47that this is such a prevalent story in
- 2:49the market is so that these tech
- 2:51companies could justify their insanely
- 2:54high stock prices because in reality
- 2:56they've run out of really good ideas. In
- 2:59fact, there's a really good interview on
- 3:00CNBC with Ed Zitron who brought up a lot
- 3:03of really great points.
- 3:04>> But fundamentally, large language models
- 3:06are not the future. The only reason big
- 3:08tech is investing in this is that
- 3:09they've run out of hyperrowth ideas.
- 3:11They don't have a next iPhone. They
- 3:13don't have a new Google search. So,
- 3:14they've put over a trillion dollars with
- 3:16trillions more to come into a kind of a
- 3:18deadend industry because when they when
- 3:20that ends, they'll have to admit that
- 3:22they don't have anything else. Now,
- 3:23throughout the video, I'm going to show
- 3:25you more clips from that interview, but
- 3:27there was also an interview with Alex
- 3:29Karp, who is the CEO of Palunteer, which
- 3:32if you don't know is the company that
- 3:34works closely with the government and
- 3:36pretty much every three-letter agency in
- 3:38the world. And Alex also brings up the
- 3:41fact that nobody really trusts AI right
- 3:44now.
- 3:44>> Who owns the data? Where is it cached?
- 3:47Are the prompts secure? Is this being
- 3:49transferred to you? Are you being comp?
- 3:52Okay, if it was so valuable, let's say I
- 3:54can make you a billion dollars right
- 3:55tomorrow. Wouldn't I say I'll make you a
- 3:58billion dollars and I want 30%. Why are
- 4:00they charging for tokens if it's so
- 4:02valuable? He is saying if the promise of
- 4:05AI is as good as they are marketing it
- 4:08to be in its current form, they would
- 4:11not be charging us for tokens. Instead,
- 4:13they'd be charging us for building a
- 4:15billion dollar business idea where they
- 4:18would take 30% of the revenue. Cuz think
- 4:20about how you pay for anything in
- 4:22business. You pay a lawyer to win a
- 4:24court case. You pay a contractor to
- 4:26remodel your house. The price you pay is
- 4:29attached to a specific result. Now, AI
- 4:33companies do not work that way. They
- 4:35charge us per what's called token usage.
- 4:39Now, a token is basically a word. Every
- 4:42word the AI reads and every word it
- 4:44writes for you, we pay for that. whether
- 4:47the answer was good or was really bad.
- 4:49And Alex Karp is basically saying why
- 4:52would they price their business that
- 4:54way? Why wouldn't Open AI chat GPT just
- 4:57say only pay me when it works? If we
- 5:00create a good idea for you, give us a
- 5:02cut of your income. But I'm telling you
- 5:05in this country at every single
- 5:07enterprise I deal with they these people
- 5:09are livid. They're like I am paying for
- 5:12tokens that create no value. These
- 5:14people are stealing the weights and
- 5:16alpha of my business and they're
- 5:17creating a wealth tax that does not help
- 5:19the poor. It just punishes starts with
- 5:21the billionaires. Every single person at
- 5:23this table is going to be paying a
- 5:24wealth tax only to punish us.
- 5:27>> If they were confident that this thing
- 5:28created this value, that would be the
- 5:31easiest sales pitch in history. Pay us
- 5:33nothing unless we make you money and
- 5:36unless we build you a billion dollar
- 5:38idea. But they can't offer that because
- 5:41these models do what's called
- 5:43hallucinate. Right? This is where they
- 5:45confidently make things up. And nobody,
- 5:48including the people who built them,
- 5:50could tell you when or really why it
- 5:52happens. Right? No one's been able to
- 5:54figure out how to fix it completely.
- 5:56>> You'll notice that both Anthropic CEO
- 5:58Darama Day and Sam Wman have both said,
- 6:00"We can't wait to see what you build
- 6:01with this." Well, that's because they
- 6:04don't know what you can build with this.
- 6:05They want everyone else to do their
- 6:06innovation for them. spend as much as
- 6:08they can on tokens and then take
- 6:09whatever's left except they lose too
- 6:11much money for that strategy to actually
- 6:13work.
- 6:14>> And that puts every corporation in
- 6:16America in a very awkward situation
- 6:19because let's say you're the CEO of a
- 6:21corporation, right? You just spent $50
- 6:23million on AI this year. So your board
- 6:26of directors asks you a question.
- 6:28They're like, "What did we get for this
- 6:30$50 million we just spent? What's the
- 6:33ROI?" And you're like, "I don't know,
- 6:35right? We don't have a number. Nobody
- 6:37has a number. Corporate America's paying
- 6:40subscription fees on a technology whose
- 6:42outcome we cannot measure. And it gets
- 6:46worse though because not only can we not
- 6:48measure it, we are also risking our
- 6:52company secrets and potentially creating
- 6:54a competitor. Here's what Alex has to
- 6:57say about that.
- 6:57>> But something has gone completely wrong.
- 7:00And the basic view among enterprises in
- 7:03this country is I'm going to chill lax
- 7:06uh and waste my time with tokens. I'm
- 7:08going to get no value and they're going
- 7:10to get my IP.
- 7:11>> The fear for all these CEOs is that when
- 7:14your company uses these models, your
- 7:17data flows through them, right? Your
- 7:19process, your trade secrets, the special
- 7:21sauce that makes you profitable, which
- 7:23Alex Karp calls the alpha. So what
- 7:27happens when the AI company that you use
- 7:31learns from your business? It just
- 7:33becomes your competitor. And this is not
- 7:34a hypothetical thing by the way.
- 7:36Anthropic launched a design product
- 7:38called Claude Design while having a
- 7:41relationship with a company called
- 7:43Figma, which is a design company. Figma
- 7:46CEO publicly said he was shocked. So,
- 7:50picture being a business and then
- 7:53watching that. You're paying your vendor
- 7:55millions of dollars a year to use their
- 7:57AI, but what you're actually doing is
- 8:00paying them and training your own
- 8:03replacement. So, what's the solution
- 8:06then? This is where it gets really
- 8:07interesting.
- 8:08>> But what is happening among the most
- 8:10technical players is they're saying, "I
- 8:13want something I own. This is my
- 8:15business. I want to own the GPUs. I want
- 8:18to own my data. I want to own the model.
- 8:20I want to control the alpha. Why would
- 8:22they get access to my data? If they're
- 8:24going to build my alpha, why wouldn't I
- 8:26control the weight?
- 8:27>> Right? What that means is instead of
- 8:29renting an AI from someone, instead you
- 8:32just download one, you run it on your
- 8:35own computers using your own data where
- 8:37no one can see it and no one can learn
- 8:39from it and also no one can shut it off.
- 8:42He then goes on to say though that most
- 8:44businesses don't even need the latest
- 8:46and greatest cuttingedge AI because you
- 8:49don't need the smartest one to process
- 8:52insurance claims, right? You need one
- 8:53that's specifically really good at
- 8:55insurance claims. And what's interesting
- 8:57is that Alex Karp profits from this
- 9:00business model as well. So why would he
- 9:02be saying all this? What's his motive?
- 9:04Cuz remember France, Germany, Spain,
- 9:07they're canceling their contracts.
- 9:09Palanteer has been losing those
- 9:10contracts across Europe all year. Now, 2
- 9:13days before that interview, Palanteer
- 9:16announced a partnership with Nvidia to
- 9:18sell open models in sovereign
- 9:21environments.
- 9:22Basically, that interview was a product
- 9:25launch for his new service, which is why
- 9:28he's out there telling other companies
- 9:29to download and own their own AI. So,
- 9:33that is the first problem with AI.
- 9:36Nobody trusts it. But there's a second
- 9:38problem that's even bigger. Now, before
- 9:40I explain the second problem, everything
- 9:42in this video, like the AI spending and
- 9:44whether this is a bubble at all, depends
- 9:46completely on where you're reading it.
- 9:47And that's where today's sponsor, Ground
- 9:49News, comes in. Ground News is an app
- 9:51that shows you the same story from
- 9:52hundreds of different outlets at the
- 9:54same time. And it tells you which ones
- 9:56are left-leaning, right leaning, or
- 9:57center, so you can see how the story
- 9:59changes depending on the source. Perfect
- 10:01example, South Korea just announced a
- 10:03huge national AI and chip investment.
- 10:05Over 159 news sources covered it. And
- 10:08here's what ground news shows.
- 10:10Left-leaning outlets frame this as a
- 10:11historic industrial strategy, stressing
- 10:14the huge scale, and they lead with the
- 10:16market's outcome. Right leaning outlets
- 10:18lean into the urgency and survival using
- 10:20phrases like race against time, framing
- 10:23it as existential for South Korea's chip
- 10:25industry. Now, center outlets just skip
- 10:27the drama and focus on policy execution.
- 10:30Even the headline number changes
- 10:31depending on the source. Some report a
- 10:34thousand trillion one, others up to
- 10:352,000 trillion, some just say 1.2
- 10:38trillion, but it's the same announcement
- 10:39with three different narratives. That's
- 10:41what ground news makes visible. I use it
- 10:43when I'm researching for these videos so
- 10:45I can separate what's actually happening
- 10:46from how it's being told. If you want to
- 10:48see the full picture of global events
- 10:50and not just one side, go to
- 10:51ground.news/jick
- 10:53or click the link down below. You'll get
- 10:5540% off the Vantage plan, which is the
- 10:57one I use, and you'll be supporting
- 10:58independent journalism and this channel.
- 11:00Thank you to Ground News for sponsoring
- 11:02this segment. And now, let's get back to
- 11:03it. Now, the second problem with AI is
- 11:05that even if every company in America
- 11:07trusted these AI companies, the money
- 11:10still does not make sense because the
- 11:12business model is broken in a way we've
- 11:14never seen from tech companies. Because
- 11:17here's how software is supposed to make
- 11:19money. Software is the greatest business
- 11:21model ever invented because you spend a
- 11:23lot of money building the thing at once,
- 11:26right? And then every new customer is
- 11:28basically free money. That's why tech
- 11:30stocks have done so well over the past
- 11:32few decades. When you buy Microsoft
- 11:35Excel, right, Microsoft doesn't spend
- 11:37anything extra to sell you that copy.
- 11:40Their costs stay the same, but their
- 11:42revenue goes up. And it's the gap
- 11:44between those two lines that is their
- 11:46profit. And that gap is why tech
- 11:48companies, the most valuable companies
- 11:50on Earth. Now, AI broke that model. And
- 11:54how they broke it was every single time
- 11:57you ask Chad GPT a question right now,
- 11:59it costs Soap AI money cuz it uses
- 12:02electricity. Chips are being worn down.
- 12:05So more customers does not translate to
- 12:08free money anymore. More customers means
- 12:11more cost dollar for dollar. So AI is
- 12:15not a software business. It's more like
- 12:17a restaurant, right? Every time a meal
- 12:19gets served, somebody has to buy the
- 12:21ingredients every time. Except this is a
- 12:24restaurant that loses money every time
- 12:26it serves food. And its plan to fix it
- 12:29is to serve more food. Now, let me give
- 12:31you some context. In 2025, Open AAI
- 12:35burned over $20 billion in just one
- 12:38year.
- 12:38>> Well, they'd be the first to be this bad
- 12:40other than we work. And even then, this
- 12:42is so much worse than that. Open AAI
- 12:43burned $20.9 billion in 2025. That's the
- 12:46auditive financials that the FT and II
- 12:48reported. And the problem with these
- 12:50companies is their margins are getting
- 12:51worse and they actually their costs
- 12:53increase linearly with their revenues.
- 12:55>> So he's basically saying that costs
- 12:57increase linearly with revenues, right?
- 13:00The two lines are going up together and
- 13:02the gap never really opens up. Now for
- 13:0525 years, every investor has been
- 13:08trained to be patient with this cuz they
- 13:11say, "Well, they're losing money now,
- 13:12right? But at scale their margins will
- 13:14get better, right? Amazon lost money for
- 13:17years. Except with AI, we just keep on
- 13:20waiting and the margins are getting
- 13:22worse cuz every new model costs more to
- 13:26run than the last one. And the market is
- 13:29starting to notice it.
- 13:30>> There is no proof that they can improve
- 13:31their margins. No amount of specialist
- 13:33silicon or supposed Vera reubans will
- 13:35bring these costs down. And we're at a
- 13:37point now where OpenAI is now
- 13:39potentially pushing their IPO to 2027
- 13:41because they couldn't get a trillion
- 13:42dollar valuation. It's clear that people
- 13:44are wising up to the problem of
- 13:46generative AI, which is there's not
- 13:48really a business there.
- 13:49>> Now, all of this, by the way, is not
- 13:50just open AI cuz look at who's paying to
- 13:53build all of this. This is from Oracle's
- 13:56annual report.
- 13:57>> Oracle is a particularly scary one
- 13:58because they are building 7.1 gawatt of
- 14:01capacity just for one customer. And they
- 14:03even said in their annual report that
- 14:04the risk was they might not get paid.
- 14:06Open AI only loses money and I think I
- 14:09estimate it's like $75 billion of
- 14:11revenue annually that they will have to
- 14:13pay for the full Stargate data center
- 14:14project in annual compute revenue. Open
- 14:16AAI can't afford that and if they can't
- 14:18Larry Ellison can't afford to pay back
- 14:20those bills and Oracle stock will be in
- 14:22jeopardy along with the margin loans
- 14:23that Mr. Ellison holds. It's genuinely
- 14:25dangerous.
- 14:26>> So Oracle is building the equivalent of
- 14:29several nuclear power plants worth of
- 14:31electricity for basically one customer.
- 14:34a customer that just lost $20 billion.
- 14:37Here's my favorite one, though. Nvidia
- 14:40sells its chips to a group of smaller
- 14:43cloud companies. They're called
- 14:44NeoClouds. Now, those companies borrow
- 14:47billions of dollars to buy Nvidia's
- 14:48chips and Nvidia rents them back.
- 14:52>> I think companies like Core and
- 14:54especially Nebius and Iron and Cipher
- 14:56Mining and all of them, Terowolf as
- 14:58well, they are all very they're
- 15:00basically outgrowths and they're
- 15:02subsidiaries of Nvidia. Nvidia is now
- 15:05according to the information going to be
- 15:07paying them to rent back their GPUs when
- 15:09they install them in the data center.
- 15:11This is the this is something that only
- 15:12happens in an industry without diverse
- 15:15and real demand.
- 15:16>> So what he's saying there is that
- 15:17Nvidia's sales are partially funded by
- 15:20Nvidia. That's like a car dealership
- 15:22lending you money to buy a car and then
- 15:25paying you to borrow the car back for
- 15:27the weekend and then reporting all of it
- 15:29as demand. Now look how much profit
- 15:31we're making, right? Yeah, because you
- 15:33are buying back your own equipment.
- 15:35There's a name for when an industry
- 15:37starts doing this. It's called not
- 15:39enough real customers. So for companies
- 15:41investing trillions in AI like
- 15:43Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Meta, what is
- 15:47the ROI from all their spending? They
- 15:50won't tell you. These companies report
- 15:52everything. Cloud revenue, ad revenue,
- 15:54YouTube revenue. But AI revenue, they're
- 15:58not telling us that. Microsoft, Google,
- 16:00and Meta, and Amazon are all doing a
- 16:02funny little I don't want to call it a
- 16:03scam, but it's a a trick where because
- 16:05their other businesses are still
- 16:07growing, but they never disclose their
- 16:08AI revenues, everyone conflates that
- 16:10with AI driving their growth. In
- 16:11reality, their other businesses are
- 16:13growing and AI is losing them money
- 16:15across the board. You'll notice that
- 16:17neither Microsoft or Amazon, who both
- 16:19share their run rate of AI, will share
- 16:21the actual AI revenues. That tells you
- 16:24that these companies are afraid. Public
- 16:26companies love good news. If they had
- 16:27good news, why wouldn't they share it?
- 16:29That's because they've only got bad news
- 16:30here.
- 16:30>> Now, as of right now, the stock market
- 16:32is still patient and investors are
- 16:34saying, "Okay, give it time still." But
- 16:37all of it really depends on one big
- 16:40assumption, which is that if and when
- 16:43the profits do come, it's going to be
- 16:46the American companies that will make
- 16:48the profits because the world has no
- 16:51other option. But the third problem with
- 16:53AI is that the world has another option.
- 16:56That option is called China. So, let me
- 16:58show you what China is really doing.
- 16:59Remember this chart from the beginning
- 17:00of the video. The trillion that America
- 17:03is spending. Well, here's something
- 17:04interesting. This is China. On that same
- 17:07scale, America, $764 billion this year,
- 17:12and then 1 trillion next year, 3% of the
- 17:16whole US economy. China, 102 billion
- 17:20this year, 123 billion next year. 0.6%
- 17:246% of their economy, which means
- 17:27America's outspending China almost 10
- 17:30to1. Why? It's cuz China figured
- 17:33something out. A developer took the
- 17:36exact same coding task and gave it to
- 17:39two AI models, Claude Opus, which is one
- 17:41of the top American models made by
- 17:43Anthropic, and GLM, which is a Chinese
- 17:46open model. Both models finished the
- 17:49same task, and both took about 5 1/2
- 17:52minutes. The American model charged
- 17:55$2.33
- 17:57and the Chinese model charged 31. That's
- 18:017 12 times cheaper. Now, before you
- 18:04think that that's a cherrypicked test,
- 18:06here is the industrywide data. This is
- 18:10called the artificial analysis
- 18:12intelligence index. And this is
- 18:14basically the official rankings of every
- 18:17AI model in the world. Now look at the
- 18:19top. The best American model scores 60.
- 18:23Now look right here. This is GLM. The
- 18:26best Chinese open model 51. And look at
- 18:29how much of this chart is from China.
- 18:32Deepseek, Quen, Kimmy, Miniax. They're
- 18:35not at the top. They are everywhere.
- 18:37They are filling the whole middle of the
- 18:40global rankings. Now to be fair, the US
- 18:43still has the smartest AI in the world.
- 18:45And that's true. But if you ask the
- 18:47question that every business is asking,
- 18:50do I need the fastest AI model to manage
- 18:53my business? The answer is no. For most
- 18:56businesses, that's things like answering
- 18:58their customer service emails to
- 19:01basically do the boring work that is 90%
- 19:04of what companies actually use AI for.
- 19:08Based on that logic, China's winning.
- 19:10The US is winning the race for the most
- 19:12dollars spent, and China is sort of
- 19:13winning the race for the customer. Now
- 19:15the question is how is China doing this
- 19:18while spending 10 times less money? And
- 19:20the answer is distillation. Okay, here's
- 19:23how it works. When you train a frontier
- 19:26AI model from scratch, that means
- 19:28spending billions of dollars teaching it
- 19:30everything the hard way. But there's a
- 19:32shortcut. You can train your model by
- 19:35studying the answers of a model that
- 19:37already exists. This is basically like
- 19:39copying someone else's homework and then
- 19:40you know the answer for almost no money
- 19:42spent, by the way. So the US spends
- 19:45trillions of dollars doing the hardest
- 19:47research in human history and then China
- 19:49just sort of copies it by compressing
- 19:51the results into smaller cheaper models
- 19:53and then it gives them away for free. It
- 19:56open sources them which means anyone can
- 19:58download them. And if you think about it
- 20:00every dollar of US AI spending it's kind
- 20:03of like a donation to the Chinese AI
- 20:06industry. And this has become common
- 20:09practice for China. So much so that they
- 20:12are doing it as a side hustle. Check
- 20:14this out. This is a model, for example,
- 20:16called LongCat. Look at the benchmarks.
- 20:18It's going toe-to-toe with Google's
- 20:20Gemini, and it's beating older versions
- 20:23of Anthropic's flagship models on
- 20:25realworld agentic tasks. But the thing
- 20:28is, do you know who built Longat? It's a
- 20:31company called Mtoan. Do you know what
- 20:33Mtoan does? It's a food delivery
- 20:37company, right? It's the Chinese Door
- 20:39Dash equivalent. And they built an AI
- 20:41that competes with the smartest labs in
- 20:44the United States. Which means when a
- 20:47company like that can do what a trillion
- 20:50dollar US company is doing, is that
- 20:53company still actually worth trillions
- 20:55of dollars? Maybe not. Cuz remember the
- 20:58assumption that's holding up the whole
- 21:00AI stock market is that let's be patient
- 21:03guys. the profits will come and when
- 21:05they do all the US companies will
- 21:08collect those profits because the world
- 21:09has no other choice. But here's what the
- 21:12actual cost is when there is a choice.
- 21:15Right? This is the same type of work.
- 21:17The American model shows 18 1.5 cents
- 21:20per task and the Chinese model 4 cents.
- 21:24Right? Within a few quality points of
- 21:25each other at a 76%
- 21:28discount. This is sort of the chart that
- 21:31destroys the whole story because you
- 21:34cannot make back a trillion dollars
- 21:37selling something that your competitor
- 21:40is giving away at 90% of the quality for
- 21:44just 10% of the price. So, let me tie
- 21:46all of this together. If all of this is
- 21:48true, then when does this bubble pop, if
- 21:51ever? And logic says it's when
- 21:54corporations stop their capex, their
- 21:57capital expenditures. It's when they
- 21:59stop spending money building all these
- 22:01data centers. But believe it or not,
- 22:04that is not when the bubble pops.
- 22:07According to the data, data shows that
- 22:09the bubble could pop a lot sooner. And
- 22:12here's why. During the dot bubble, the
- 22:16NASDAQ index peaked in March of 2000.
- 22:19Now, all the companies that were laying
- 22:21the fiber optic cables at the time,
- 22:23which are the data centers of that era,
- 22:25they kept spending billions of dollars
- 22:28well into 2001, even though the stock
- 22:32market collapsed a full year before
- 22:35their spending stopped. So, the market
- 22:38did not wait for companies to stop
- 22:40spending and to admit to anything. The
- 22:43logic of the market changed when enough
- 22:45investors stopped believing in that
- 22:48story. So the trigger this time around I
- 22:51think will be something a lot more
- 22:53subtle. Something like a big tech
- 22:56earnings call where a CEO says something
- 22:58like we are moderating uh the pace of
- 23:01our infrastructure investment or some
- 23:03boring small thing like that. And that's
- 23:05because the first company that gets
- 23:08rewarded by Wall Street for cutting
- 23:10their AI spending that will give every
- 23:14other CEO permission to do the same
- 23:16thing. In fact, according to Ed Zitron,
- 23:18Goldman Sachs recently said that the
- 23:20first hyperscaler to pull back on
- 23:23spending will get rewarded by the
- 23:26markets.
- 23:26>> So, I heard Goldman analysts say
- 23:28recently that the first hyperscaler to
- 23:30pull capex will get rewarded by the
- 23:32markets. I think the capex pullbacks are
- 23:34they're the sign. I also think any
- 23:36financing falling through Baro and AI or
- 23:38anthropic would be a sign, but I think
- 23:40we're going to start seeing AI companies
- 23:42kind of start falling out of favor and
- 23:44not being able to raise money. But the
- 23:46big thing is debt. When data center debt
- 23:48stops being issued, that will be when
- 23:50it's bedtime for this industry because
- 23:52even if they think AI is going to win,
- 23:54we've got 100 gawatt or so of data
- 23:56center capacity allegedly under
- 23:57construction or in planning. That's
- 23:59trillions of dollars of money that needs
- 24:01to come from somewhere and we are
- 24:03tapping out the debt markets. We saw
- 24:04that with Google raising that $85
- 24:06billion equity raise.
- 24:08>> That's going to be one of the early
- 24:10signs. Now, another sign that we could
- 24:13be at the peak of the bubble is the bond
- 24:15market. That's because unlike the stock
- 24:18market, which runs on stories of hopes
- 24:20and dreams, the bond market doesn't work
- 24:23like that. All bond investors care about
- 24:27is will I get paid my interest payment.
- 24:30Right? The moment they get scared, they
- 24:33start to demand a much higher interest
- 24:35rate. Now, how we measure their fear is
- 24:38something called a credit spread. Here's
- 24:41how that works. In the world of
- 24:43investing, there's a concept called the
- 24:45riskfree interest rate. It's called that
- 24:49because it is set by the US government
- 24:52which is considered to be the safest
- 24:54borrower on earth. That's government
- 24:56bonds, right? Whatever they're at,
- 24:58that's the risk-free rate. Okay? But
- 25:01remember, companies can also issue
- 25:04bonds. Except because companies are
- 25:06risky, cuz they can go out of business,
- 25:09their bonds pay that risk-free rate plus
- 25:15something extra to compensate you for
- 25:18the risk that their company could go
- 25:19broke and never pay you back. Makes
- 25:21sense, right? Well, that extra between
- 25:24the risk-free rate and their rate, that
- 25:28is called the spread. Think of it as an
- 25:30insurance premium. When lenders feel
- 25:33safe, the premium is small, meaning the
- 25:36spreads are what's called tight, meaning
- 25:38corporate bond rates are close to the
- 25:40risk-free rate. But when investors feel
- 25:44like there's some market risk, the
- 25:47premium explodes, right? The spread
- 25:51increases. That is one of the early
- 25:53signs that we could start to see that
- 25:55this is going to fall apart. Now, here's
- 25:57an example. By the way, see this
- 25:59increase in 2008. Spreads hit almost
- 26:0222%.
- 26:04Lenders started to charge very high
- 26:06prices. Credit shut off completely and
- 26:08companies that ran on borrowed money
- 26:10just collapsed. Also see the jump in
- 26:132020. Now look at today. The spreads are
- 26:16very tight. 2.6%.
- 26:19That is close to the lowest and the
- 26:21calmst readings in recorded history.
- 26:24What this means for now is that either
- 26:27bond investors see no problem and
- 26:30everything in this video is completely
- 26:31wrong or bond investors are wrong and
- 26:35they can be wrong. Look at early 2007.
- 26:38The housing crisis was already underway.
- 26:41Bear Sterns was months away from blowing
- 26:43up and spreads were only 2 1/2%. They
- 26:47were super calm right where they are
- 26:50today. Right? The fear gauge didn't
- 26:52predict 2008, though. That's because
- 26:54spreads don't really measure what is
- 26:57true. They measure what lenders believe.
- 27:00In 2007, lenders believe the housing
- 27:04market was safe. Which now we know
- 27:05obviously that it wasn't. But the point
- 27:08is is that when you see someone on the
- 27:09news say, "Hey, don't worry. AI is
- 27:12totally safe. It's doing great. Credit
- 27:14markets, right? The spreads are not so
- 27:16worried." Right? If you hear that,
- 27:18remember that the credit market wasn't
- 27:20worried in ' 07 either. Credit markets
- 27:22can be wrong and they have been wrong
- 27:25before.
- 27:25>> Although you you'd agree that spreads do
- 27:27not do not imply that that moment is
- 27:30anytime soon.
- 27:30>> Spreads have been wrong before. That's
- 27:32the thing. And I think that perhaps the
- 27:34timing isn't going to be immediate, but
- 27:35at some point a hyperscaler is going to
- 27:37pull back capex. And when that happens,
- 27:40well, this is an industry of followers.
- 27:41The tech industry doesn't have ideas.
- 27:43They just copy each other. Everyone
- 27:44copied Sachin Nadella when he put chat
- 27:47GPT in Bing. And I think that whoever
- 27:49breaks capex first, they'll follow them,
- 27:51too.
- 27:51>> And finally, I just want to show you
- 27:53what Michael Bur posted a few days ago.
- 27:55And remember, he's the guy who predicted
- 27:57the 2008 financial crisis. So, in chart
- 27:59one, he shows chip stocks are trading at
- 28:02the top of their 15-year valuation
- 28:06range. Basically, the same peak that
- 28:08they hit right before the 2024
- 28:09correction, which is marked with those
- 28:11red circles. The market is basically
- 28:13pricing chips like the trillion dollars
- 28:15has already been made. Now chart two is
- 28:18even more interesting. This tracks the
- 28:20three groups of AI stocks since last
- 28:23year. Now the gray and white lines going
- 28:25up to 200% are the AI winners, right?
- 28:28The companies selling the chips and the
- 28:30equipment. But the orange line way at
- 28:32the bottom that's barely above zero are
- 28:36the hyperscalers, right? Companies like
- 28:38Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Meta. What
- 28:41does that mean? It means the market is
- 28:43telling us that the companies that are
- 28:46doing the spending, the trillions of
- 28:48dollars, right, they're getting almost
- 28:50no credit for it. Their stock values
- 28:52aren't really going up. Wall Street
- 28:54instead is rewarding the companies that
- 28:57are getting that money and it's ignoring
- 28:59the companies spending to build it.
- 29:01Right? That's basically the market
- 29:02admitting it doesn't believe the
- 29:05spenders will make it back. And in the
- 29:07third chart he posted, it shows the
- 29:10Silicon Data LLM token expenditure
- 29:12index. It's a fancy name, but what it
- 29:15shows is it shows us the price that
- 29:17people pay for AI tokens. This index is
- 29:21the price of AI itself. And look at it.
- 29:24It's down almost 20% from its high in
- 29:25May. Now, the question is, why would the
- 29:28price of AI be going down during the
- 29:30biggest AI buildout in history?
- 29:32Bloomberg says either it's because
- 29:34demand is going to cheaper models or
- 29:36buyers are just not willing to pay more.
- 29:39Look at the middle one. Demand is
- 29:41shifting towards cheaper models. And
- 29:43that is the China theory that's showing
- 29:46up in this data. Now, to be fair though,
- 29:48Michael Bur's been early before. And
- 29:50when people say early in the market,
- 29:52that's a polite way of saying he's been
- 29:54wrong, right? He's made market crash
- 29:56predictions over the years quite a lot.
- 29:58That didn't really come true. And even
- 30:01this index has dips that have recovered.
- 30:04Basically, Bloomberg says that the
- 30:05signal for all of this is ambiguous,
- 30:07right? We can't really learn anything
- 30:09from this data. It can mean anything.
- 30:11So, basically, the real answer to how
- 30:14long it will take for the AI bubble to
- 30:15pop, if ever, is that no one knows. But
- 30:19those are some of the early signs to
- 30:21look for based on the data from the
- 30:24past. Now, if you're interested in
- 30:26seeing how I'm personally preparing and
- 30:27more of my thoughts, those videos live
- 30:29in the premium member section where
- 30:30you'll also get access to my videos
- 30:32earlier. And if that's valuable, the
- 30:33link is down below. It allows me to make
- 30:35more videos like this one and take on
- 30:36fewer sponsors. Thank you for watching
- 30:38and being a premium member. I hope you
- 30:40have a wonderful rest of your day. Smash
- 30:41the like button, subscribe if you
- 30:43haven't already. Would love to see you
- 30:44back here next time. See you soon.
- 30:46Bye-bye.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of China Is About To Pop The AI Bubble by Andrei Jikh, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 5,420 words across 803 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.