Budget 2026: What's Changing for Canadian Investors? — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00Yesterday, the government of Canada
- 0:02released their budget for 2026, which
- 0:05will always include a bunch of new
- 0:07spending, potentially some new credits,
- 0:09and some things like that. And so,
- 0:11>> [music]
- 0:11>> we are going to cover our initial
- 0:13reactions to what we've seen in the
- 0:15budget right here on the podcast. This
- 0:17is coming in pretty quick, um but we
- 0:19hope to have more analysis as time goes
- 0:21on, but this is our initial reactions to
- 0:23budget 2026. Thanks for being here for
- 0:25this special episode of the Canadian
- 0:27Money Roadmap.
- 0:30All right, Sam. We got to make this
- 0:31quick,
- 0:32>> [laughter]
- 0:33>> but I think that's all we need because
- 0:35uh in the budget, there weren't too many
- 0:38crazy things that affect us on a
- 0:40personal level. There's lots of spending
- 0:41and investing things at the
- 0:43um you know, big picture government
- 0:45level, uh but at the personal finance
- 0:49level,
- 0:50um there's a few things that came up
- 0:51that were kind of interesting. So, we'll
- 0:52get into some of those today.
- 0:55Um
- 0:55I was thinking we could probably start
- 0:58with the Canada Strong Fund if you
- 1:01uh wanted to discuss that and some of
- 1:03the things that came up in that. This
- 1:04was announced in the middle of the year,
- 1:06and they gave us a few more details. I'm
- 1:09not going to say um an overwhelming
- 1:11amount of uh specificity here, but we
- 1:14got a few more details to go through.
- 1:15>> Right. And so, yeah, earlier in the
- 1:17year, we heard about kind of the the
- 1:19plan to roll out the Canada Strong Fund,
- 1:22which would
- 1:22be some version of a sovereign wealth
- 1:25fund for Canada that um
- 1:29uh the government invest in to invest in
- 1:30projects and and build, ideally build
- 1:33wealth for the country. Uh but one
- 1:34interesting thing about that initial
- 1:37um
- 1:37press release was that they were talking
- 1:39about wanting to allow Canadians to
- 1:41invest in this themselves.
- 1:44And so, this budget provided a bit more,
- 1:46and I'll say a bit more uh detail about
- 1:49what that might actually look like. But
- 1:51what's particularly interesting is that
- 1:52they want to roll this out quite quickly
- 1:54in 2027, some of these investment
- 1:56products.
- 1:57And so, the budget for 2026 talked about
- 2:00what they call uh Canada Strong Notes
- 2:04and provide some small detail or some
- 2:07details about what that might look like.
- 2:08So, essentially, these would be a
- 2:11version of principal protected notes,
- 2:14which are an investment vehicle
- 2:18where you basically put in a certain
- 2:20amount of principal, certain amount of
- 2:21money,
- 2:22for a certain amount of time, and they
- 2:24promise to give you that
- 2:26um that money back at maturity. And
- 2:28then, if the fund does well in that time
- 2:30or if the company that you're investing
- 2:32with does well at that time in that
- 2:33time, you might get some bonuses.
- 2:36Um
- 2:36And so,
- 2:38this is interesting because the Canadian
- 2:40government is seemingly using this uh
- 2:43this vehicle
- 2:45to provide an opportunity for Canadians
- 2:48to invest in the Canada Strong Fund.
- 2:50>> Yeah, it seems um it's it's a little bit
- 2:53different than anything else that's
- 2:54available out there for Canadians to
- 2:57participate. Like, I always take the
- 2:59approach of un- unless we have a lot of
- 3:03specific details on something, I'm going
- 3:05to take the approach of cautious
- 3:07optimism. Like, huh,
- 3:10sounds interesting, for sure. Now, is
- 3:13this a sovereign wealth fund then or is
- 3:16it something different, right? Like, my
- 3:19understanding of sovereign wealth funds
- 3:21is typically it's a it's where royalties
- 3:24from natural resource extraction,
- 3:26typically, um get invested.
- 3:29Norway has a very interesting program
- 3:31where they invest in anything other than
- 3:33Norwegian uh products uh projects,
- 3:36pardon me.
- 3:37Um
- 3:37in particular, oil and gas. So, they
- 3:39take their oil and gas revenues, they
- 3:41put it in here, and they invest it
- 3:42everywhere else. Um they have a very
- 3:44strong mandate within their sovereign
- 3:47wealth fund for
- 3:48um ESG type investing, so environmental
- 3:51sustainability and governance factors.
- 3:53Um
- 3:54This seems very different. Um I saw some
- 3:57some comments online where it's like,
- 3:59okay, if we're comparing what we see
- 4:01here in the Canada Strong Fund versus
- 4:03what's available in Norway where they're
- 4:05trying to get away from any potential
- 4:07corruption or, you know,
- 4:10issues where
- 4:12if there's a mandated place to invest,
- 4:14that might drive prices up because it's
- 4:17like, well, this is the only game in
- 4:18town and so we can kind of charge
- 4:21whatever we want, right? There's There's
- 4:23There's
- 4:23it doesn't reek of problems, but it's
- 4:26like,
- 4:26there's there could be some challenges
- 4:28there, perhaps. And again, the details
- 4:31of which like like for the Canada Strong
- 4:34Fund specifically are a little bit more
- 4:37unknown at the time, but you were able
- 4:39to dig up a little bit more of the
- 4:41the technical details that weren't as
- 4:44obviously present elsewhere. Can you
- 4:46kind of explain how they're going to be
- 4:48structuring this a little bit?
- 4:49>> Yeah, so the structure of these Canada
- 4:51Strong notes will be
- 4:54um
- 4:55basically, you can buy notes with 5, 7,
- 4:59or 10-year maturities. So, that would
- 5:01essentially mean you put in a certain
- 5:03amount at the start and they promise to
- 5:05give you that money back at that
- 5:07maturity, whether that's 5, 7, or 10
- 5:09years. And then in the meantime
- 5:11they're suggesting they'll pay a coupon
- 5:13rate, so a set
- 5:15uh rate annually. And then also you
- 5:18might be eligible to benefit if the fund
- 5:21if the Canada Strong Fund goes up um you
- 5:24may be able to benefit with annual
- 5:27interest payments from that. So, that
- 5:29would kind of be the broad way that it
- 5:30would work. I think one interesting
- 5:32thing to note is that on
- 5:33um in the budget and in other
- 5:36places, uh they're making the assertion
- 5:39that these will be
- 5:41easy to buy and sell
- 5:43uh almost kind of presenting them as a
- 5:45liquid thing. And I think it's important
- 5:48to note that these do have maturities,
- 5:49so you can buy and sell
- 5:51principal-protected notes on a secondary
- 5:53market. So, maybe they're going to try
- 5:54to help facilitate that buying and
- 5:56selling kind of before maturity. Uh but
- 5:59these are notes that have specific
- 6:01maturity dates when you would get that
- 6:03money specifically back. So, you do have
- 6:05to hold it for that time
- 6:08to get your principal
- 6:10back. One kind of risk of principal
- 6:14protected notes as they're used, you
- 6:16know, for banks issuing them is uh
- 6:19the credit risk of a bank actually
- 6:22defaulting and not being able to pay it
- 6:24back. So, this isn't a you know, an
- 6:26interesting thing where a government is
- 6:28backing that. We're not expecting the
- 6:29government to default on any of these
- 6:31notes. Uh and if some
- 6:32>> If they are
- 6:33>> Not expecting to. If they are then
- 6:35something is going wrong.
- 6:36>> Yeah.
- 6:37Uh okay. So, yeah. So, there's some
- 6:39um
- 6:41So, a little bit more information there.
- 6:43I will say we'll probably talk about
- 6:45this as more detail comes out as they
- 6:46become available. We don't know if
- 6:48they're eligible for RRSPs or TFSAs or
- 6:50things like that, what the rates are
- 6:52going to be. Yeah, all sorts of stuff
- 6:55yet to come, but I would say
- 6:57sounds interesting enough to kind of
- 6:59keep it on your radar. Um next kind of
- 7:02thing that would be interesting enough
- 7:03to keep on your radar is the fact that
- 7:05they are hoping to push the RRSPs, so
- 7:09the retirement
- 7:10registered retirement savings plan to a
- 7:13single account system, whereas currently
- 7:17um at some point you got to convert your
- 7:19RSP to a RIF. There's paperwork involved
- 7:21in that. You have to get a new account
- 7:23set up. You have to transfer assets from
- 7:25your RSP to your RIF. There's some
- 7:28different tax rules between the two. So,
- 7:30for example, if you wanted to take money
- 7:32out of the uh of each account, say
- 7:35you're 65 years old, um if you took
- 7:38money out of an RSP, it's different than
- 7:41if you were to take money out of a RIF
- 7:43because um RIF income after 65, you can
- 7:47share up to 50% of that with your spouse
- 7:50uh for tax purposes. And that can be
- 7:52very advantageous, whereas in RSP, they
- 7:54can't. So,
- 7:55my reading of the proposal suggests that
- 7:58they want to harmonize the tax system
- 8:01between the two account types and then
- 8:03just keep it as an RSP. The language
- 8:05they used in the budget was an RRSP for
- 8:08life. And on the surface, I like
- 8:10simplicity. I really like this. Um a
- 8:13fellow advisor in the Financial Planning
- 8:15Association forum
- 8:17mentioned that this is almost exactly
- 8:19the way that the IRA account works in
- 8:21the United States.
- 8:23And so there is some precedent for
- 8:25understanding how the structure works.
- 8:27However, we are moving from a system to
- 8:30that. And so within that, there could be
- 8:33some complexity.
- 8:34Um so some things that we don't know yet
- 8:36is how withholding taxes work. Again,
- 8:38withholding taxes are just the
- 8:39prepayment of taxes you're likely to owe
- 8:41anyways. There are different rules
- 8:43between RRSPs and RIFs. At the very
- 8:46least, the withholding taxes, however
- 8:48they're applied, if it's based on the
- 8:50minimums or just any withdrawals, I hope
- 8:53that the brackets will get adjusted cuz
- 8:55they haven't been adjusted since the
- 8:57'70s.
- 8:58Um and believe it or not, we've had a
- 9:00pile of inflation since the '70s. And so
- 9:02the dollar figures there are virtually
- 9:04irrelevant
- 9:06to anything that we have right now. And
- 9:08so if there's no minimums, cuz there's
- 9:09typically no withholding taxes on the
- 9:11minimums, there's just withholding taxes
- 9:12on the amounts above that, there could
- 9:14be a situation where retirees actually
- 9:16have to withdraw more to account for
- 9:19that. Again, if the brackets are not
- 9:21adjusted. We don't have any information
- 9:23on this yet because it's going to go to
- 9:24a consultation period.
- 9:26And our professional association will
- 9:28likely add some commentary there with
- 9:31some issues.
- 9:32Um another thing that I think might be a
- 9:36potential problem uh is related related
- 9:38to spousal RRSPs because when you have a
- 9:42spousal RRSP,
- 9:44there are issues around something called
- 9:47income attribution. So the idea with a
- 9:49spousal RRSP is that if you have a
- 9:50spouse that makes a lot of money and one
- 9:52that doesn't, the one that makes a lot
- 9:53of money can contribute to the other
- 9:54person's
- 9:56account. They get the deduction, the
- 9:58high earner gets the deduction and uses
- 10:00up their RRSP room, but the money's
- 10:02invested in the lower income earning
- 10:03spouse's name. Then when they take it
- 10:05out, in theory, it's taxable in their
- 10:07name. But there is a holding period of 2
- 10:10years plus a day to um
- 10:13have that income attributed to them as
- 10:17opposed to the higher earning spouse.
- 10:19But, there is a fun wrinkle there where
- 10:22if the
- 10:24the other spouse, the receiving spouse
- 10:26converts that to a spousal RIF there's
- 10:29no income attribution on the minimum
- 10:33that comes out of it. So, there could be
- 10:35a situation where
- 10:37you know, you make a big contribution in
- 10:39one year, they convert it to a RIF the
- 10:41following year, and you take it out.
- 10:43I've done this with a client before.
- 10:45It's very unique circumstance
- 10:47where it would be applicable or needs to
- 10:50be accounted for, but it is something
- 10:52that's in there. There's also situation
- 10:55where when you convert an account to a
- 10:57RIF, you can decide at that time to use
- 10:59your spouse's age for calculating your
- 11:02minimum. So, assuming you don't need the
- 11:04money and you're trying to minimize
- 11:06taxable income you could use a lower
- 11:09a younger spouse's age to calculate your
- 11:12minimums, but there's no clarity on how
- 11:15that would work if there's no conversion
- 11:16that's happening necessarily. There's
- 11:18also no
- 11:20mention of contributions stopping at a
- 11:23certain age. I suspect probably,
- 11:26but it's not mentioned in there yet. So,
- 11:28this is definitely one that is as I
- 11:31mentioned before is still up for
- 11:33consultation, and so the details of it
- 11:35have not been ironed out yet. There are
- 11:37some other simplification things upon
- 11:38like the passing of a spouse. Right now,
- 11:40it's like it all works out, but it's a
- 11:42bit of a song and dance and a bunch of
- 11:45you have to include the income and then
- 11:47you apply for a deduction.
- 11:49>> [snorts]
- 11:49>> A few different forms in between. It's
- 11:52fine, but they're just trying to
- 11:53simplify all that. I subscribe to that.
- 11:56That would be nice. But, anyways, the
- 11:58RSP might rule the day here in terms of
- 12:01the only account that you actually have
- 12:02to worry about. I've described the RIF
- 12:05and the RSP as buckets and then buckets
- 12:07with holes in them.
- 12:08We might be just stuck with a bucket and
- 12:10you and you keep the same old bucket.
- 12:12So, we'll we'll see how this plays out.
- 12:13>> old bucket, but it will develop a hole
- 12:15over time due to wear and tear or
- 12:17something.
- 12:17>> Yes.
- 12:18>> You'll have to have a new analogy.
- 12:20Um
- 12:21>> Much like our own much like our own
- 12:23cells over time.
- 12:24>> Yes. But so, yeah, just to reiterate,
- 12:26basically um
- 12:28the minimums in this new situation,
- 12:30you'd keep the RRSP, there would be no
- 12:31conversion to a RRIF, but the minimums
- 12:33would just start
- 12:34uh in the
- 12:35uh in the year, I guess, that you turn
- 12:3772, right?
- 12:38>> Yeah, there's language of 71, but it's
- 12:40like right now you have to convert your
- 12:42RRSP to a RRIF
- 12:44in the year that you turn 71, but you
- 12:46only have to take the minimums out at
- 12:47the year that you turn 72. So
- 12:49>> So, some details to be ironed out, but
- 12:50that's
- 12:51but uh interesting and and it seems like
- 12:54a theme in some of these things we're
- 12:55talking about. I guess I some of these
- 12:58other changes outside the Canada Strong
- 13:00notes is this desire to simplify
- 13:03uh the taxation and maybe update it, as
- 13:05you're saying, some of these um
- 13:07withholding taxes numbers haven't been
- 13:09updated for
- 13:1050 years. This is similar and something
- 13:12we can just maybe mention quickly, but
- 13:14they've also proposed to
- 13:16um change the installment thresholds for
- 13:20tax when you pay it. And so, right now,
- 13:23you know, if you if you have um I guess
- 13:25it would be outstanding tax of $3,000 or
- 13:28more,
- 13:30um
- 13:31you have to pay quarterly installments
- 13:33to pay that down.
- 13:35>> In the following year, you kind of you
- 13:36get subject to to quarterly installments
- 13:39for the next year. So, uh
- 13:41it's the government says like, "Hey,
- 13:43you've got all this income that you're
- 13:44not prepaying any tax on." Um next year,
- 13:48regardless of your situation, I know
- 13:50there's some elections that you can file
- 13:51and whatever it's but it's it's
- 13:53complicated. But the threshold's pretty
- 13:54low. 3,000 bucks um
- 13:57of taxes. So, for retirees, like um you
- 14:00know, if if you're listening to this
- 14:01podcast, you're not retired yet, this
- 14:03stuff kind of starts to get a little bit
- 14:05complicated because there's not
- 14:06withholding taxes required on a lot of
- 14:08your sources of income when
- 14:10um like your CPP, your OAS, and your um
- 14:13some of your RRIF withdrawals or your
- 14:15minimums, they don't have withholding
- 14:16taxes. I capital gains transactions uh
- 14:19from an unregistered account, those
- 14:20don't have withholding taxes. Whereas
- 14:21your employment income, it has to, by
- 14:23law,
- 14:24if you earn employment income. Uh so,
- 14:26this is all very, very different. So, to
- 14:28find oneself in a situation where you
- 14:30owe some taxes and need to be subject to
- 14:32quarterly installments, pretty common.
- 14:34>> Yeah, and so they hadn't updated that
- 14:36figure of 3,000 where you meet that
- 14:38threshold where you have to pay these
- 14:40installments uh since 2008. And so, now
- 14:43they've decided or they proposed to
- 14:45update that threshold to 70 $500 or
- 14:487,500.
- 14:50Uh so, over kind of doubling and a bit
- 14:52more that number, which would just
- 14:55create more leeway for um if you do have
- 14:57some of those outstanding numbers not to
- 14:58be forced to pay those installments.
- 15:01>> Yeah, this is just an an annoyance
- 15:03minimization
- 15:04um announcement more than it is an
- 15:07actual reduction in taxes or or anything
- 15:09like that. It's just
- 15:11most people hate quarterlies, and those
- 15:13those will still still be applicable in
- 15:15in many cases, but for the average
- 15:17person that just has a bit of a lump sum
- 15:20at the end of the year because they
- 15:21didn't withhold enough taxes from all
- 15:22their different sources of income, it's
- 15:24totally fine, but now you can just
- 15:25probably pay it in a lump sum and it'll
- 15:26be okay. Now, as far as uh the last
- 15:29thing probably thought we'd mention
- 15:31that's applicable to some people, uh
- 15:33there's a whole pile of new credits. So,
- 15:35for things like if you're an artist, uh
- 15:38there's a going to be a
- 15:40kind of like an income carve out here,
- 15:42and I don't know how they're going to
- 15:43define artist. I don't know how
- 15:45I didn't really look into that one too
- 15:46much, but that one seemed um a little
- 15:48bit interesting, but
- 15:50for those uh people that are eligible
- 15:52for the uh
- 15:54what used to be the GST credit, they've
- 15:57renamed it and restructured it, so it's
- 15:59not a I don't believe it is actually a
- 16:01credit anymore. It is a payment. So, a
- 16:03credit requires you to have taxable
- 16:05income to offset against. I think this
- 16:07is just a payment. Um so, maybe it's
- 16:10called a refundable credit, that's also
- 16:11another term for it.
- 16:14But, the uh they've renamed the GST HST
- 16:18credit as the Canada Groceries and
- 16:21Essentials Benefit. They did that
- 16:23earlier this year in in 2026, but now
- 16:25that that's what the language is we're
- 16:27referring to, so it's not anything new
- 16:29necessarily, but the new thing for this
- 16:31one is that you get a one-time bump if
- 16:33you qualify for it. You can qualify for
- 16:35up to 50% more for the 2027 year coming
- 16:39up. So,
- 16:40for those with modest to low incomes or
- 16:43if you're a student or something like
- 16:44that or your kids are
- 16:46that would be
- 16:48some welcome
- 16:50changes there,
- 16:51but most people listening to this
- 16:53podcast probably are not going to be
- 16:55eligible for that one, but people in
- 16:57certain circumstances be a nice little
- 17:00bit of help. Okay, so those were some of
- 17:01the initial thoughts that we had here.
- 17:03Again, we're recording this on Friday
- 17:05morning, so this hasn't even been out
- 17:07for 24 hours yet. By the time you listen
- 17:10to this, perhaps some changes of or
- 17:11clarifications have already been
- 17:13provided, but anyways, for those of you
- 17:15that are looking for something quick as
- 17:17far as a reaction goes or some things
- 17:18that might affect you, I hope this
- 17:20episode was valuable for you. Thanks for
- 17:22listening or watching us however you
- 17:24found us today and we will see you on
- 17:26Wednesday for our more regularly
- 17:27scheduled episode of the Canadian Money
- 17:29Roadmap. Take care.
- 17:30The contents of this podcast [music] do
- 17:32not constitute an offer or solicitation
- 17:34for residents in the United States or
- 17:36[music] any other jurisdiction where
- 17:38Evan Neufeld, Cedar Point Wealth, or
- 17:40Sterling Mutuals is not registered or
- 17:42permitted to conduct business. Mutual
- 17:43funds are provided through Sterling
- 17:45[music] Mutuals Commissions, trailing
- 17:46commissions, management fees, and
- 17:48expenses all may be associated with
- 17:50mutual fund investments. Please read the
- 17:52prospectus carefully before investing.
- 17:54Mutual funds are not guaranteed, [music]
- 17:55their values fluctuate frequently, and
- 17:57past performance may not be repeated.
- 17:59Financial planning services are provided
- 18:01by [music] Evan Neufeld through Cedar
- 18:02Point Wealth and are not the business of
- 18:04or monitored by Sterling Mutuals Inc.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of Budget 2026: What's Changing for Canadian Investors? by Evan Neufeld, CFP®, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 3,307 words across 527 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to choose a caption track available on the video.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, caption language selection, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.