YouTube2Text

Benjamin Ferencz Interview — Transcript

by UConn Gladstein Family Human Rights Institute · 1,182 words · 191 segments · language en · Watch on YouTube

Full transcript

  1. 0:00greetings to you all
  2. 0:02my name is benjamin ferenz
  3. 0:04and i believe i'm the sole surviving
  4. 0:07prosecutor
  5. 0:09of the nuremberg war crimes trials
  6. 0:11following world war ii
  7. 0:13i am now in my 96th year and i'm pleased
  8. 0:17to be invited to talk to you at the dodd
  9. 0:20center
  10. 0:21about what nuremberg was all about
  11. 0:24what we have learned what we still have
  12. 0:26to learn
  13. 0:27and
  14. 0:28is it possible to achieve the goals
  15. 0:31which we conveyed at nuremberg
  16. 0:33justice robert jackson was the leading
  17. 0:36jurist in the united states and
  18. 0:38appointed by the president of the united
  19. 0:40states to head the american delegation
  20. 0:42to the international military tribunal
  21. 0:45tom dodd who was also an outstanding
  22. 0:48lawyer and a senator of the united
  23. 0:50states was a very important
  24. 0:53assistant to justice jackson
  25. 0:56as a result of those trials
  26. 0:59the world was told that aggression is
  27. 1:02the supreme international crime war
  28. 1:05making itself which had been legal in
  29. 1:07the past was declared to be an
  30. 1:10international crime that was a great
  31. 1:12step forward in the evolution of
  32. 1:14civilized behavior it also taught
  33. 1:17that law must apply equally to everyone
  34. 1:20at the same time it emphasized that the
  35. 1:23law must be flexible enough to change
  36. 1:26with the times in order to meet the
  37. 1:28needs
  38. 1:29of the society which is supposed to bind
  39. 1:33that coupled with the united nations
  40. 1:35charter set forth a program from which
  41. 1:38it was clear that in order to have a
  42. 1:40peaceful society you needed clear laws
  43. 1:44which would define what was permissible
  44. 1:47or not permissible you needed courts to
  45. 1:50determine whether the laws have been
  46. 1:51violated and you need a system of
  47. 1:54effective enforcement none of those
  48. 1:56prerequisites has been met in full we
  49. 1:59have made progress on the laws
  50. 2:02recognizing crimes against humanity
  51. 2:04we have made progress on the courts we
  52. 2:06do have an international criminal court
  53. 2:09we have made
  54. 2:10practically no progress on the
  55. 2:11enforcement leg of that three-legged
  56. 2:14stool on which civilization must depend
  57. 2:17the result is we have the chaos which we
  58. 2:19have today
  59. 2:21unfortunately our current system
  60. 2:24prescribes that if the leaders are
  61. 2:26unable to agree
  62. 2:27on an important international issue
  63. 2:30affecting their national honor or their
  64. 2:32pride or their economics or their
  65. 2:34religious outlook they send young people
  66. 2:36out to kill other young people whom they
  67. 2:38don't even know
  68. 2:40who may never have harmed them who may
  69. 2:42never have harmed anyone at all and when
  70. 2:44they get tired of killing each other
  71. 2:46they take a rest and then they start
  72. 2:48again and they start killing each other
  73. 2:50for the same reasons it's preposterous
  74. 2:53to accept such a system to regulate
  75. 2:56human behavior
  76. 2:57the university of connecticut has been
  77. 2:59one of the forefront organizations
  78. 3:01stressing human rights
  79. 3:03the most fundamental of all human rights
  80. 3:05is the right to life that has appeared
  81. 3:07in many human rights documents and
  82. 3:09should be obvious to every thinking
  83. 3:11person
  84. 3:12how do you do that in the face of the
  85. 3:14world in which we find
  86. 3:17it can be done you must begin by
  87. 3:19changing the way people think and feel
  88. 3:22change of hearts and minds about the use
  89. 3:24of armed force to settle their disputes
  90. 3:27it should not be tolerable but we need
  91. 3:29political support for that and we see in
  92. 3:32the united states that political support
  93. 3:34is sometimes very narrow
  94. 3:36those who have a different point of view
  95. 3:38are entitled to respect but you don't
  96. 3:40have to agree with them if they think
  97. 3:43that the only way to go forward is by
  98. 3:45killing your adversary that's a very bad
  99. 3:47mistake because our capacity to kill
  100. 3:50exceeds our capacity today to control
  101. 3:52human behavior and our capacity to kill
  102. 3:55has reached enormous strides in
  103. 3:57cyberspace and elsewhere we can destroy
  104. 4:00all life on this planet unless we change
  105. 4:02our way of thinking and acting
  106. 4:05so the lessons of nuremberg remain still
  107. 4:08to be taught
  108. 4:10senator tom dodd was an important voice
  109. 4:13justice jackson was an important voice
  110. 4:16they were followed by general telfer
  111. 4:18taylor who set up the subsequent trials
  112. 4:20of which i was apart i had been a combat
  113. 4:23soldier in world war ii i had seen the
  114. 4:25horrors of war first hand i had seen the
  115. 4:29crematorium when they were still going i
  116. 4:31saw dead bodies not only floating in the
  117. 4:33sea at normandy beach but on the ground
  118. 4:36of the many camps which i entered as an
  119. 4:39american soldier seeking evidence of the
  120. 4:41crimes
  121. 4:43i then became the chief prosecutor for
  122. 4:45the united states in one of the
  123. 4:46subsequent trials which convicted 22
  124. 4:49defendants of murdering in cold blood
  125. 4:52over a million people including
  126. 4:54thousands of children shot one shot at a
  127. 4:57time
  128. 4:58all 22 of my defendants were convicted
  129. 5:0114 were sentenced to death
  130. 5:03i was then 27 years old and it was my
  131. 5:06first case
  132. 5:07i am now in my 96th year
  133. 5:10and i've had a second case
  134. 5:12finally we created an international
  135. 5:14criminal court which now exists in the
  136. 5:16hague
  137. 5:17when they came to the end of their first
  138. 5:19trial
  139. 5:20they asked me to do the closing remarks
  140. 5:22for the prosecution which i did i was
  141. 5:24then 92 years old that was my second
  142. 5:27case
  143. 5:28but the world had come a long way since
  144. 5:30then it still has a long way to go but a
  145. 5:33three-word solution will enable you to
  146. 5:35focus law not war should be the slogan
  147. 5:39and the goal
  148. 5:40say can it be done of course it can be
  149. 5:42done imagine what the world would look
  150. 5:44like
  151. 5:45if you could save all those billions of
  152. 5:47dollars which are spent every day on
  153. 5:49things to kill other innocent people
  154. 5:52imagine how we could have funds
  155. 5:54available to care for the poor to
  156. 5:56control the environment to do all of the
  157. 5:58human rights things which the university
  158. 6:01of connecticut and many others are
  159. 6:02striving to do
  160. 6:04can it be done of course it can be done
  161. 6:07i have seen in my life that doing the
  162. 6:09impossible is very possible they used to
  163. 6:11say when i was young it's like landing
  164. 6:13on the moon yes i have pictures of an
  165. 6:15american flag being flown on the moon by
  166. 6:18an american astronaut we have women
  167. 6:21today who not only are deans of the law
  168. 6:24schools who sit on the supreme court of
  169. 6:26the united states our constitution
  170. 6:28didn't give them right even to vote or
  171. 6:30to own property we have seen the end of
  172. 6:32colonialism we have seen the end of
  173. 6:34slavery more or less all of these things
  174. 6:36are imperfect but we have done the
  175. 6:38impossible so what's so impossible of
  176. 6:40substituting law instead of war senator
  177. 6:44god
  178. 6:45and his son
  179. 6:47were forerunners of that
  180. 6:50if you make up your mind
  181. 6:51that law is better than war
  182. 6:54and law should be the substitute for war
  183. 6:56the university of connecticut which has
  184. 6:58its law school respected school will
  185. 7:00contribute its role to changing the
  186. 7:03world
  187. 7:04it's important to remember three things
  188. 7:07never give up
  189. 7:08two never give up three never give up
  190. 7:12it's up to the young people to succeed
  191. 7:14and i'm sure you can do it

About this transcript

This page contains the full transcript of Benjamin Ferencz Interview by UConn Gladstein Family Human Rights Institute, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 1,182 words across 191 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.

What you can do with it

Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.

Free YouTube transcript tool

YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.