Are we losing our minds to AI? | BBC News — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:08Hello and welcome to AI Decoded with me,
- 0:11Mark Chislac, the BBC's AI
- 0:12correspondent. This week, we're asking a
- 0:15question that goes right to the heart of
- 0:17what makes us human. AI can write
- 0:19essays, generate software code,
- 0:21summarize research papers, even help
- 0:23plan journeys and holidays. Every single
- 0:25week, tech companies claim another task
- 0:28that once required expertise and years
- 0:31of experience can now be completed with
- 0:33a carefully worded prompt. But as AI
- 0:36becomes a bigger part of our lives, are
- 0:39we becoming less skilled? Are we
- 0:41witnessing something researchers are
- 0:43calling cognitive offloading?
- 0:45Outsourcing our thinking to machines to
- 0:48explore whether AI is enhancing human
- 0:50intelligence or quietly eroding it.
- 0:52We're joined by two people with slightly
- 0:55different perspectives on this
- 0:58transformative technology. Oasis Gelini
- 1:00is one of Britain's leading pediatric
- 1:03neurosurgeons based at Great Orman
- 1:05Street Hospital. And from Helsinki, Dr.
- 1:07Tapani Rintteralia, who conducts
- 1:09research into how digital technologies
- 1:11transform human work, expertise, and
- 1:14decision-making. And of course, we're
- 1:16joined by AI decoded co-host Dr.
- 1:19Stephanie Hair, author of technology is
- 1:21not neutral. Oasis, I'm going to start
- 1:23with you if I may. Medical technology is
- 1:26always evolving from stethoscopes all
- 1:29the way through to things like MRI
- 1:30scanners. Now, this program's recently
- 1:33followed some of your work to separate
- 1:35conjoined twins, joined at the head. The
- 1:37surgery was successful, and that
- 1:40wouldn't have been possible without some
- 1:42advanced technology, but also a massive
- 1:45amount of human skill. So what do you
- 1:48think of the concept of AI assistance?
- 1:52>> I think it's hugely hugely important AI
- 1:55assistance. I know that's a strong
- 1:57stance. So allow me to explain.
- 2:00>> We we are focusing perhaps a bit too
- 2:03much on the harm that AI can can do or I
- 2:07mean clearly there's the potential for
- 2:09enormous harm but there's a lot of focus
- 2:11on the harm it it can do to us humans in
- 2:14the future.
- 2:14>> [snorts]
- 2:15>> there's not enough attention given to
- 2:17the potential harm that the human mind,
- 2:20our way of thinking can do and does to
- 2:22humans.
- 2:23>> Okay.
- 2:24>> And it's important to draw that balance
- 2:25because AI when used properly and we
- 2:28will discuss what that means. AI when
- 2:30used properly has the potential to
- 2:33improve our way of thinking
- 2:35exponentially exponentially. But the
- 2:37trick is getting that balance right
- 2:38where we use it at the right level in
- 2:41the right way to answer the questions
- 2:44appropriate questions but not rely on it
- 2:46too much.
- 2:47>> Okay, Tony I want to bring you in here.
- 2:49The word deskkilling sounds dramatic.
- 2:53What exactly do researchers mean when
- 2:55they talk about AIdriven deskkilling?
- 2:58>> Yes. So there are a couple of different
- 2:59meanings actually for that. So typically
- 3:02I think the way we think about it
- 3:04especially with AI we see it as an
- 3:06unintended side effect of technology in
- 3:09a way I also I call it skill erosion. So
- 3:12that could be something that happen.
- 3:13You're an expert. You rely too much on
- 3:15automation AI and then you lose your
- 3:18skills over time. But then you could
- 3:20also refer to not being an expert yet,
- 3:23but you are actually training to be one.
- 3:25And in the training nowadays, you often
- 3:28have many automated tools and then you
- 3:31never really grapple the real kind of
- 3:34nitty-gritty part of the work because
- 3:36you have such a sop sophisticated tools
- 3:38and then you never really become that
- 3:40skilled. And then there is also a third
- 3:42meaning which is more of a from the work
- 3:44organizing perspective
- 3:46uh deskkilling has been uh defined as
- 3:50simplifying the work task. So using
- 3:52automation uh to simplify the work task
- 3:55so that less skilled workers can do
- 3:58that. So then you can actually hire less
- 4:00skilled workers who uh are typically
- 4:03cheaper labor.
- 4:04>> A way I want to bring it into your
- 4:06sphere of of expertise into medicine. If
- 4:09a young doctor learns how to practice
- 4:11medicine with AI support from day one,
- 4:15could they develop differently from
- 4:18earlier generations of clinicians?
- 4:20>> For me, Mark, there is no question of
- 4:21that. It is um you know the analogy that
- 4:25I would use is I'll go as far back as
- 4:27the discovery of fire. When humans
- 4:30discovered fire and the use of fire, a
- 4:32lot changed not just with our physiology
- 4:34but with our way of life. We learned how
- 4:36to use it for the most part. creatively
- 4:39and then the humans chained and adapted
- 4:42to this technology. AI is going to do a
- 4:44similar thing for humans. Humans will
- 4:46adapt and adjust and change
- 4:48physiologically, anatomically because AI
- 4:50exists in this world. The question
- 4:52really is how do we how do we how do we
- 4:56monitor that change and how do we lead
- 4:58that change? And that's for me the the
- 5:01question is you know AI can go in many
- 5:03different directions. It is a tool which
- 5:05is available to us at the moment. But
- 5:07what we do have a clear say on is the
- 5:11direction we want to end up in. What
- 5:13would we like to become in 20 50 years
- 5:16time one we have some control over that
- 5:18for sure. And the pace with which it
- 5:21happens we have control over that too.
- 5:23So the doctors of the future, the people
- 5:25that are really going to crack the the
- 5:28enigmas and get the inventions and do
- 5:31the things that we really would like
- 5:32them to do are the people that learn to
- 5:34use the AI as an augmentative tool. We
- 5:38we've spoken about this before. I think
- 5:40the word artificial intelligence is the
- 5:42wrong characterization. There's nothing
- 5:44artificial about artificial
- 5:46intelligence.
- 5:47>> I would feel much more comfortable if we
- 5:50change the lingo, if it's possible at
- 5:52all. I don't know. But if we change the
- 5:53linger,
- 5:54>> that ship has already sailed. I think
- 5:56>> it back and call it augmentative
- 5:57intelligence because that is what it is.
- 5:59It's here to stay whether we like it or
- 6:01not.
- 6:02>> But if we can use it, augment it, use it
- 6:04to augment our intelligence in the right
- 6:06way,
- 6:07>> that's when we make the most of it.
- 6:09>> So what do you perceive as the risks in
- 6:12the future if doctors become really
- 6:14really good at interpreting things like
- 6:16AI recommendations but less confident at
- 6:20challenging those recommendations? Okay.
- 6:22So,
- 6:24the first thing we need to remember is
- 6:26that Moses did not bring AI down from
- 6:29the mountain. That's not where AI came
- 6:31from. Okay. So, where did AI? [laughter]
- 6:34>> I don't remember that anywhere in my
- 6:35Bible study at school. I went to went to
- 6:37a Catholic school and I was educated by
- 6:39nuns and I definitely don't remember
- 6:41anything about large language models in
- 6:44the the first bit of the Bible.
- 6:45>> The Ten Commandments, the last time I
- 6:47read them again, does not talk about AI.
- 6:49It does not come from there.
- 6:51>> That shall not prompt was definitely not
- 6:53[laughter] in there.
- 6:54>> Indeed. And so, you know, I and that's
- 6:56really important to just keep in mind
- 6:58and you know, I'm I'm making a little
- 6:59light of it. But the point is a lot of
- 7:03what AI is based on. Not all of it, but
- 7:05a lot of what AI is based on is human
- 7:07generated or human interpreted
- 7:09knowledge. What we how we see the world,
- 7:11what our reality is. And that is what a
- 7:14lot of our language models are based on
- 7:15at the moment and our AI platforms. Now,
- 7:17why is that important? Because there are
- 7:20shortcomings in the human way of
- 7:21thinking. Our way of thinking, we deal
- 7:25with data. Our way of thinking is
- 7:27replete with biases, is replete with
- 7:30prejudices and our strategic ambiguity.
- 7:32Right? And it is important to bear in
- 7:35mind that the AI agents that are being
- 7:38developed at the moment and will carry
- 7:40on do have those shortcomings as well.
- 7:43So we we can't take them as gospel. we
- 7:46they are good assistants but they can
- 7:48make all the errors that humans make and
- 7:50it's really important to be cognizant of
- 7:52that. So for the doctors of the future
- 7:54if they can learn to work with AI in
- 7:56that fashion for certain task they far
- 7:58exceed human capabilities for sure and
- 8:00they've proven that time and time again.
- 8:02So great, it's a really good tool for
- 8:05this particular task. But if you then
- 8:07say turn around and say, okay, how would
- 8:08you separate a set of twins? Can I just
- 8:10rely on my AI? That's not going to work.
- 8:13But where it will help is when we did
- 8:15our most recent separation of twins.
- 8:17There was one particular task I needed
- 8:18to understand if I use distractors
- 8:21between these two bones, how much
- 8:23distraction can I achieve over a period
- 8:25of a few weeks. Well, we have an AI
- 8:27model that we've built to give us that
- 8:29answer. We use that model. It was quite
- 8:31accurate. So to for that specific bit of
- 8:34information AI was wonderful but the
- 8:36whole package how you put it together is
- 8:38still the domain of the doctor.
- 8:40>> You're an expert in your field though
- 8:42and you have taken you know the you have
- 8:45exams at a at regular at regular
- 8:48intervals and more
- 8:51you are you are constantly tested and
- 8:53constantly learning what you what you
- 8:56actually do. When we think about these
- 8:57technologies and their applications
- 8:59outside of fields where people are
- 9:02experts at an elite level,
- 9:05>> are there different sorts of risks?
- 9:08>> Mark, the the reason I'm called an
- 9:10expert and the reason I am doing the
- 9:13work I'm doing is because I work at the
- 9:16edge of my abilities pretty much every
- 9:18week.
- 9:19>> You're in the swimming pool and your
- 9:20feet are only just touching the bottom
- 9:23of the pool.
- 9:24>> Uh, yes. Yes. That's your comfort zone.
- 9:27>> So when we're doing these surgeries, a
- 9:29lot of these surgeries have not been
- 9:30done before. We have to push the
- 9:31boundaries. We have to discover new ways
- 9:33of doing things. We have to invent new
- 9:35platforms. So this is all iterative
- 9:38which adds every time we do this adds to
- 9:40our knowledge base that little bit and
- 9:42working at the edge of your capabilities
- 9:44is what makes you go forward. Now if you
- 9:47for whatever reason take that away from
- 9:49the doctors of the future, they will not
- 9:51progress as we do. AI is not going to
- 9:54come in and create creativity for them.
- 9:57That is very much a human thing. We have
- 9:59to lead that and then use AI as an
- 10:01augmentative tool.
- 10:02>> Stephanie,
- 10:03>> my understanding is that robot surgery
- 10:05is really really good for a lot of
- 10:07different types of surgeries and many
- 10:09surgeons have been worried that they
- 10:11could be replaced and yet we don't
- 10:13replace them. We keep human surgeons
- 10:17at their ability where they, you know,
- 10:19they could scrub up and do an operation
- 10:20today if they absolutely had to in an
- 10:22emergency situation. You don't want
- 10:24those skills and experience and
- 10:26confidence to atrophy. So, I think about
- 10:29that a lot for all of us. Most of us
- 10:30aren't under the pressure of being a
- 10:32surgeon, but all of us have to be able
- 10:35to constantly have that awareness of who
- 10:37am I with my augmented self, all of my
- 10:40tools, all of my technologies, of which
- 10:41AI is probably the most powerful at the
- 10:44moment. And then who am I, you know,
- 10:47just on my own sheer talent, experience,
- 10:51and how do you train? How are you
- 10:53mindfully training yourself? That's what
- 10:56I that's what I worry about.
- 10:57>> I want to bring into pan here. I want to
- 10:59bring in Pani because Tony what do you
- 11:00think when when AI and human judgment
- 11:03sort of disagree
- 11:04who do you think ultimately should have
- 11:06the final say?
- 11:07>> Oh well depends on context obviously but
- 11:10mainly human like in most cases
- 11:12definitely human. It is a very powerful
- 11:14augmentative tool especially for those
- 11:16who are already you know experts who who
- 11:19can who know how to use it very
- 11:20mindfully and and and responsibly. Um
- 11:24but there's a certain tendency of course
- 11:26humans like there's a whole body of
- 11:27research on automation complacency
- 11:29uh when we have automated systems like
- 11:31let's say in aviation you're a pilot and
- 11:34those systems work so well we get kind
- 11:36of get used to those system working
- 11:38really well and when you know sometimes
- 11:40something happens technology fails or
- 11:42for some reason you can't use it maybe
- 11:44it's a type of a situation that the the
- 11:46technology hasn't been you know designed
- 11:48to deal with uh and then that that's
- 11:50where the concern is that have you been
- 11:52practicing that muscle uh you know
- 11:55whether it's cognitive muscle or or
- 11:57physical activity. Have you been
- 11:59actually training that are you ready to
- 12:01react to that situation?
- 12:03>> I can see a way chomping at the bit
- 12:04there to get to respond.
- 12:06>> Yeah, absolutely. Because I'd like to
- 12:07follow it up with a counter question for
- 12:09you Mark and and you Stephanie, when are
- 12:12you going to be ready to god forbid you
- 12:15need medical intervention, medical
- 12:17advice? When are you going to be ready
- 12:19to go to an AI agent and say, "I need my
- 12:22gallbladder taken out. I've heard that
- 12:24you are very, very good and Google's
- 12:25done a great job with you, son, and so
- 12:27forth. I trust myself to you, Mr. AI
- 12:30agent. When are you going to be ready
- 12:31for that?"
- 12:32>> Never.
- 12:32>> I can say, yeah, I can say very
- 12:34confidently, [laughter]
- 12:35absolutely never.
- 12:36>> So, so here's the thing. When we look at
- 12:37human interactions, I mean, certainly
- 12:39applies in medicine, but I'd go as far
- 12:40as all human interaction, it's
- 12:42fundamentally based on trust or lack
- 12:44thereof. Yeah. But let's talk about
- 12:46trust. And for me as a children's brain
- 12:49surgeon, day in day out, week in week
- 12:52out, I have parents that come to our
- 12:54hospital, parents that have sick
- 12:57children, and parents that entrust you
- 13:00with their child, potentially their most
- 13:02beloved, their most prized
- 13:06possession. And it's it's why do they do
- 13:09that? Yes, they have read about you and
- 13:11so on and so forth, but the ultimate
- 13:13thing is trust. They look at you, they
- 13:15talk to you, they place their trust in
- 13:17you. So the responsibility lies with you
- 13:20in my mind. You know, it's you can you
- 13:22can never go back to those parents and
- 13:24say, "Oh, by the way, I did a really
- 13:25good operation. The AI agent didn't
- 13:27really play ball today, so sorry, didn't
- 13:29turn out quite well, but the operation
- 13:31was good." That doesn't I mean, that's
- 13:32just a nonsensical response, right? So,
- 13:35you carry the ultimate responsibility.
- 13:37You've been trusted with something and
- 13:40medicine in particular, but as all human
- 13:42intervention, it's based on trust and
- 13:44that trust is fundamentally between
- 13:45humans and humans.
- 13:47>> AI can augment that. It can augment you
- 13:49in your work,
- 13:50>> but it cannot take over that role.
- 13:52That's critical.
- 13:53>> Would you get in a self-driving car?
- 13:55>> Yeah, I've thought about that often
- 13:57after at the end of a late shift when I
- 13:59don't feel like driving home. Um the
- 14:02short answer is yes because for me
- 14:04that's a much more repetitive task and
- 14:07the stats will show that in time they
- 14:10are safer. They already show that but
- 14:11you know so I'd be more comfortable with
- 14:13a self-driving car when it comes to
- 14:15surgery that level of care that level of
- 14:17detail. I don't think so.
- 14:19>> Do you think someone could appear more
- 14:21highly skilled than they are because
- 14:23they're working alongside AI?
- 14:26>> Yes, it happens all the time. You look
- 14:28around and people come to you with these
- 14:29beautiful presentations and your
- 14:32students often and then you ask them the
- 14:33first question and they fall apart.
- 14:35>> So those people they actually understand
- 14:36a lot less than they think they
- 14:38understand or at least they understand a
- 14:39lot less than they are purporting to
- 14:40understand.
- 14:41>> What they present is just fantastic. But
- 14:43when you have to dive into what's behind
- 14:45the presentation there not the substance
- 14:48is not quite there.
- 14:49>> Okay.
- 14:50>> You got to use it or you lose it right
- 14:53with your brain
- 14:54>> is just a muscle. As Tani just said it
- 14:56is a muscle. You use it or you lose it.
- 14:58It's as simple as that.
- 14:59>> Yeah.
- 14:59>> And so the choice is yours.
- 15:01>> Tobani, do you think that listening to
- 15:03Oasis, do you think that medicine
- 15:04represents the clearest example of risks
- 15:08around areas of of deskkilling?
- 15:11>> Oh yeah. It's it's a very clear and and
- 15:13really good example uh because that's
- 15:15you know where we don't want things to
- 15:17go wrong and and that's where that
- 15:18interpersonal trust what he was talking
- 15:20about is really important. uh but
- 15:22obviously there are because of the the
- 15:24kind of general purpose technology
- 15:26nature of of the modern AI systems is
- 15:28that you know they can do so many things
- 15:30in different contexts. Though obviously
- 15:33that concern is kind of in in in many
- 15:36areas nowadays and something I wanted to
- 15:38also point out I I think the acceptance
- 15:42of the risk if you know if you hand over
- 15:44something to a machine I think that has
- 15:47a lot to do with the cultural and social
- 15:49context where we live in but then you
- 15:51know if once AI systems are so good that
- 15:53they can be shown statistically to lead
- 15:56into fewer errors than with human
- 15:57surgeons that might change and it's I
- 16:00guess the general
- 16:02social, cultural, technological context
- 16:03in that how much have we actually
- 16:06immersed our lives with technologies and
- 16:08automation that might change over time.
- 16:10So it'll be an interesting thing to to
- 16:13see and to think about is that you know
- 16:15what are we willing to to hand over over
- 16:18to to to machines when you know when
- 16:21they start performing really well when
- 16:23uh when they let's say they are better
- 16:25or more trustworthy kindergarten
- 16:27teachers than than humans you know than
- 16:29fible humans. So uh but yeah I mean
- 16:32right now uh we are still fortunately at
- 16:35not not at that stage.
- 16:37>> Is this about though things like trust
- 16:39are also about you know what level of
- 16:41accuracy do you need in a certain task
- 16:43or in a certain job something that
- 16:45you're commissioning. Um liability is
- 16:48another thing. So maybe we're willing to
- 16:50tolerate more risk for a PowerPoint
- 16:52presentation if we're a management
- 16:53consultant than we are from our doctor
- 16:56where we want you know zero risk. Thank
- 16:58you very much. Right. So there's that
- 17:01question and I also wonder if there's a
- 17:03question that would be useful for us to
- 17:04think about in terms of when we
- 17:06introduce AI into building our skills
- 17:09and knowledge. Do we need children
- 17:12working with AI right now or do we need
- 17:14children reading books given that we
- 17:15know literacy rates are really
- 17:17struggling? Do we want children doing
- 17:18mathematics the old-fashioned way first
- 17:21and then they graduate into using AI at
- 17:24a later date? did over at university or
- 17:26for for junior doctors starting out. Is
- 17:29there something valuable about learning
- 17:31things the old way, the graft way, the
- 17:33painstaking staking way? So, you develop
- 17:35the feel to sense checks that you know
- 17:38when AI is wrong. I don't know how you
- 17:40develop that ability if you've never
- 17:42worked without it.
- 17:43>> Well, wait. I mean, as a neurosurgeon,
- 17:46>> what does neuroscience tell us about how
- 17:49the brain develops and if AI has any
- 17:51effect on that development? this
- 17:53discussion, this whole global interest
- 17:55in intelligence is really telling. I
- 17:57lecture quite a bit um medical students,
- 18:00doctors and and uh what have you. You go
- 18:02into a lecture theater and you say,
- 18:04"Okay, how many people here have heard
- 18:06about artificial intelligence?" Pretty
- 18:08much everybody raises their hand up. I
- 18:09mean there may be the odd bloodite who's
- 18:12who's not, but pretty much everybody
- 18:13100%. Then my next question is how many
- 18:16people here have heard about organic
- 18:18intelligence? And there is at most a
- 18:20handful of hands that go up. And I find
- 18:23that utterly fascinating. AI has been
- 18:25around in the public domain for perhaps
- 18:27the past 15 20 years. The human brain
- 18:30organic intelligence has been in
- 18:32development and us.
- 18:36>> Intelligence 1.0 if you like.
- 18:38>> Intelligence indeed. And the and it's
- 18:40really imperative that we spend a lot
- 18:42more time understanding intelligence per
- 18:45se organic intelligence because a lot of
- 18:48the questions that we're asking about AI
- 18:50where it would be good where it you know
- 18:52we need to watch it come from the
- 18:54lessons we learned from organic
- 18:55intelligence. So for example the human
- 18:57brain what does the human brain do? What
- 19:00you know we've got 86 billion neurons we
- 19:02only need a handful to really breathe
- 19:04and eat and walk around. What does the
- 19:06rest 86 billion neurons do? Put in a
- 19:09sentence, the human brain is a tool of
- 19:11prediction. Period. It's a prediction
- 19:12engine. That's what your brain does, my
- 19:14brain, everybody's brain all the time.
- 19:16Now, people who are that little bit
- 19:19better at predicting the future are the
- 19:21people we call lucky. There's nothing
- 19:23godsend about being lucky. It's just
- 19:25their algorithms that little bit better
- 19:27refined. They can see things perhaps one
- 19:29or two steps clearer than the rest of
- 19:30us. The BBC will do the world a huge
- 19:34service if we can have a program called
- 19:37OI decoded, organic intelligence
- 19:39decoded. That's my proposal.
- 19:41>> That's getting commissioned next week.
- 19:42Okay.
- 19:43>> I'm taking it upstairs. We're taking
- 19:44that one upstairs. Okay. I've got an
- 19:45audience question now, and this is for
- 19:47one for you, Stephanie. It's from John
- 19:49Hin in Columbus, Ohio, and he says, "Is
- 19:53AI using the Gillette razor marketing
- 19:56strategy where they essentially give
- 19:58away the razor for free, but make up
- 20:02both cost and profit on selling the
- 20:04blades?"
- 20:05>> Yes. Um, a great question from someone
- 20:08from the great state of Ohio. So, I'm
- 20:09not surprised. I think that's probably
- 20:11pretty accurate. Um, it's also like, you
- 20:14know, the drug easing model. you know,
- 20:15your first hits free and you get them
- 20:17hooked and then they have to come back.
- 20:19So the goal is you're looking for
- 20:21stickiness when you are building a
- 20:23technology or a tool. You want to give
- 20:25it away to people. Let them play with
- 20:27it. Let it let them see how much it
- 20:28makes their lives better. And then if
- 20:30you threaten to take it away, what
- 20:32you're hoping is they will howl and
- 20:34protest and then you say, "That's fine
- 20:35because we have this lovely subscription
- 20:37model."
- 20:38>> That's where and then you know they're
- 20:40using it for the rest of your lives.
- 20:41What you want is that to be embedded in
- 20:43their lives and then they can't live
- 20:45without it. If you start to get
- 20:47dependent on AI and you can't do your
- 20:50work without it, you can't do school
- 20:52without it. You don't know how to
- 20:54navigate your emotions without it
- 20:56because it's your therapist, it's your
- 20:57girlfriend, it's your companion. That
- 21:00starts to get quite dangerous, that kind
- 21:02of dependency. Oasis, do you think that
- 21:05AI could actually enhance critical
- 21:08thinking rather than replace it?
- 21:11>> I do. I do. No, I think I I you go back
- 21:14to this. I think AI has the potential,
- 21:17enormous potential in many different
- 21:19ways, whichever ways you let it go. You
- 21:21know, it has the potential to do us
- 21:22enormous harm. There is no question of
- 21:24that. No question. And I completely
- 21:26understand the people who say, you know,
- 21:28shut down all AI. We don't want an AI.
- 21:30Now I understand their sentiment but we
- 21:32need to be pragmatic. AI is here. It's
- 21:34going to stay whether we like it or not.
- 21:36Our best chance is to understand it and
- 21:39to work iteratively with it and try and
- 21:42stay at pace or ahead of it. That's the
- 21:44optimal. The tasks that AI is really
- 21:47good at. We should be using it for those
- 21:49tasks. The repetitive tasks to augment
- 21:51our way of thinking. It is our plan and
- 21:54AI feeds into it. That is what we should
- 21:57be doing. The risk that we run, as we've
- 21:59just heard from Stephanie, is if we if
- 22:02we outsource our creativity, which then
- 22:05becomes a very very sort of fundamental
- 22:08human trait, something that we learn
- 22:10from a very young age. If we outsource
- 22:12our creativity, that is where Stephanie
- 22:15used the word dangerous. I'd use the
- 22:16word sad. That is where we start to lose
- 22:18our humanity. That is what makes us
- 22:20human. We are special. All of us here,
- 22:22all eight billion of us are special in
- 22:24our own right. And we need to maintain
- 22:26that. That is imperative.
- 22:29>> Tali, where have you seen AI genuinely
- 22:34improve human expertise?
- 22:38>> That's a great question, Mark. Um, I'd
- 22:40say personally, uh, in areas, you know,
- 22:43there are some areas that are not your
- 22:46core expertise. Like I'm I'm an
- 22:47information systems researcher, but I'm
- 22:50not an expert in tax law. And if I have
- 22:51to understand something about tax or tax
- 22:53deductions, um it's actually very
- 22:56difficult to interpret the the tax
- 22:59regulation that's available on tax
- 23:00office website. Uh but I've noticed like
- 23:03AI can be helpful in that. I can
- 23:05actually upskill myself in tax by
- 23:07talking to AI that makes it more
- 23:09understandable and then I can go back
- 23:11and check like okay does it actually
- 23:12check out what the AI is saying. So in
- 23:15that sense yes.
- 23:16>> Yeah. I I mean I I I I I I wonder if if
- 23:19people are using AI every day, if people
- 23:22in the audience are using AI every day,
- 23:24what practical habits do you think uh
- 23:29could help preserve critical thinking?
- 23:31Stephanie, what do you think about that?
- 23:33>> I mean, I know some very heavy AI users,
- 23:36you know, to the point where it's
- 23:38because we forget it depends also on
- 23:39what's your entry point. So for me for
- 23:42instance when I use AI I try to only do
- 23:44this on my computer and I have really
- 23:46strict rules for myself but that's
- 23:49because I've been studying this for a
- 23:50really long time and I know and even
- 23:52then you know I'm valuable I also get
- 23:53tired and lazy. I try not to go to it
- 23:56first but there are people who might be
- 23:58going to it through their Amazon Echo.
- 24:00So they might have a few of those around
- 24:01their house and they're just it's just
- 24:03there. It's in the the ether of their
- 24:05home life and they and their children
- 24:07are talking with it. Everybody's talking
- 24:09with it and you just learn to kind of,
- 24:11you know, when you're lazy, you just ask
- 24:14the AI, what's the weather, what should
- 24:16I cook, what should I wear to this
- 24:18party, um, what's the fastest way for me
- 24:20to get across London, you know, in 30
- 24:22minutes, etc. And you stop actually just
- 24:25realizing that you could have done that
- 24:26heavy lifting yourself, you know. So,
- 24:29I'm just saying there's that versus if
- 24:31you're doing it on your phone, going in
- 24:33through your computer, if you have sort
- 24:34of rules for yourself about it, and I
- 24:37understand it. There's no judgment here.
- 24:38All of this was pushed out on us really
- 24:40fast. Everybody's experimenting with it.
- 24:42Nobody had best practice. But I think
- 24:44now that we're seeing some of these
- 24:45studies coming in like Tony and others
- 24:48who are saying be really careful how
- 24:49you're using it. Maybe we don't want
- 24:51this in schools right away or maybe not
- 24:52for six-year-olds. Maybe it's better for
- 24:54when you're 16 and you're a bit older or
- 24:56even at university. Yes, we want to
- 24:58prepare you to go into work, but we
- 25:00really need you doing your core skills
- 25:02of literacy, numeracy, your creat your
- 25:04creativity skills, constructive
- 25:06thinking, critical thinking. How are we
- 25:09going to really embed those first? And
- 25:11that goes for us adults, too.
- 25:13>> A better understanding of organic
- 25:15intelligence then. Well, that is all we
- 25:18have time for. Uh, a big thank you to
- 25:21all of our guests. If you have any
- 25:23thoughts, questions, or feedback on
- 25:25today's program, do email us at
- 25:27aidcodedbc.co.uk.
- 25:29The QR code is on screen right now. Uh,
- 25:33and that takes you straight to the AI
- 25:34Decoded YouTube playlist. And every
- 25:37episode is, of course, on the BBC i
- 25:40Player. We'll see you next time.
- 25:43[music]
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of Are we losing our minds to AI? | BBC News by BBC News, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 4,843 words across 707 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.