AO Application Tutorial — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00Welcome to the 2026 aging out awards
- 0:03application guide. In this tutorial, I
- 0:05am going to walk you through the main
- 0:07things applicants need to know before
- 0:09submitting. We will cover the timeline,
- 0:12eligibility, award categories,
- 0:14application structure, and a few tips to
- 0:16help strengthen your application and
- 0:18make it easier for reviewers to
- 0:20understand. The goal is simple. Help
- 0:22your organization explain the work you
- 0:24are already doing for youth aging out of
- 0:26foster care as clearly as possible.
- 0:29My name is Frank Curiel and I will be
- 0:31walking you through this application
- 0:33guide. Think of this as a step-by-step
- 0:36overview. I will explain how to choose
- 0:38the correct award category, organize
- 0:41your answers, use data, and prepare
- 0:43attachments. By the end, you should have
- 0:46a better idea of what reviewers are
- 0:47looking for, and how to submit with more
- 0:50confidence.
- 0:52The 2026 AO awards application opens on
- 0:55June 1st and closes on July 31st. That
- 0:58gives applicants June and July to
- 1:00prepare, write, review, and submit.
- 1:03Judging takes place from August through
- 1:05October, and winners are expected to be
- 1:07announced between November and December.
- 1:10My recommendation is to start early.
- 1:12Draft your answers outside the
- 1:14application platform first. Have someone
- 1:16review them and then paste the final
- 1:18version into the portal before the
- 1:20deadline. Award categories. The Flame
- 1:23Award is for small organizations or
- 1:25programs with zero to 10 full-time or
- 1:28part-time employees. The FIRE award is
- 1:30for organizations or programs with 11 or
- 1:33more employees. Volunteers are not
- 1:35counted in the staff total. The Phoenix
- 1:38Award is the youth impact award. To be
- 1:40considered for Phoenix, applicants must
- 1:42first apply to either Flame or Fire. A
- 1:45simple way to think about it is this.
- 1:47Flame and fire are primarily based on
- 1:49staff size while Phoenix focuses on
- 1:51measurable impact on youth. When we talk
- 1:54about measurable impact, we are not only
- 1:56asking what services were provided. We
- 1:59are asking what changed for youth as a
- 2:01result of those services.
- 2:03Strong examples include the number of
- 2:05youth served, program completion rates,
- 2:08housing stability, education progress,
- 2:10employment outcomes, life skills
- 2:12milestones, and follow-up results after
- 2:14services. For Phoenix, reviewers want to
- 2:17see that the organization collects data,
- 2:20tracks outcomes over time, and uses that
- 2:22information to improve the program.
- 2:25Applicants should be clear about whether
- 2:27they are applying as an organization or
- 2:29as a program inside a larger
- 2:31organization.
- 2:32If the entire organization is dedicated
- 2:34to serving youth aging out of foster
- 2:36care, then count the staff connected to
- 2:39the organization.
- 2:40But if aging out services are only one
- 2:43program inside a larger institution,
- 2:45count only the staff tied to that
- 2:47program. Do not count the entire parent
- 2:50organization if only one program is
- 2:52applying.
- 2:54Before writing the application, confirm
- 2:56the basic eligibility requirements. The
- 2:58applicant must represent a United
- 3:00States-based 501c3
- 3:03nonprofit educational institution or
- 3:06program within one. The applicant must
- 3:08serve youth preparing to age out of
- 3:10foster care or youth who have already
- 3:12exited care. The services must have been
- 3:14active for at least 3 years, meaning
- 3:17they started on or before June 1st,
- 3:192023. Also, previous winners are not
- 3:22eligible unless their prior award was
- 3:24made between 2019 and 2021.
- 3:28Now we will move into 10 tips for
- 3:30completing the application. These tips
- 3:32are based on common scoring patterns and
- 3:34feedback from past reviewers. The big
- 3:37themes are be detailed, tell a clear
- 3:39story, answer the actual AO questions,
- 3:42use the suggested headers, keep the
- 3:44writing consistent, proofread, choose
- 3:46only your primary service areas, include
- 3:49actual data, focus on current work, and
- 3:52use attachments that directly support
- 3:53your application.
- 3:56Tip one is to provide details. Reviewers
- 3:59need enough information to understand
- 4:00your program, not just a high-level
- 4:03summary. A strong answer explains who is
- 4:06involved, what services are offered,
- 4:08where the work happens, when youth
- 4:10participate, how the process works, and
- 4:12why the approach is effective. Details
- 4:15help reviewers picture the youth
- 4:16experience, and understand how the
- 4:18program actually supports young people.
- 4:21Tip two is to tell a clear story. Try
- 4:23not to only list services. For example,
- 4:26saying we have a mentor program does not
- 4:28tell reviewers much. A stronger answer
- 4:31explains what happens when a young
- 4:33person enters the program, how they are
- 4:35matched, how staff support that
- 4:37relationship, and what skills or
- 4:39outcomes the program helps build. The
- 4:41story should be clear and meaningful
- 4:43while staying focused on youth support
- 4:45and impact.
- 4:47Tip three is to address AO's questions
- 4:50directly. It is okay to use existing
- 4:52grant language as a starting point, but
- 4:54do not copy and paste old grant text
- 4:56without adjusting it. Reviewers are
- 4:59scoring the answers based on AO's
- 5:01prompts and format. Make sure each
- 5:03response answers the question being
- 5:05asked, uses the recommended structure,
- 5:07and gives the information reviewers need
- 5:09to evaluate your program.
- 5:12Tip four is to use AO's suggested
- 5:14headers. This is one of the easiest ways
- 5:17to keep the application organized. Copy
- 5:19the headers into a working document.
- 5:22Draft your answers under each header.
- 5:24Proofread and edit outside the portal
- 5:26and then paste the final version into
- 5:28the application. Headers help reviewers
- 5:30find the information they are looking
- 5:32for and make the scoring process easier.
- 5:35For each service area, applicants should
- 5:38address the main themes shown here.
- 5:40Explain the services offered, how youth
- 5:42are engaged, the research or evidence
- 5:44behind the work, and any partnerships
- 5:46involved. also describe the knowledge
- 5:49and skills youth gain, how the program
- 5:51supports self-sufficiency, what
- 5:53intangible strengths youth build, and
- 5:55how success is measured. These sections
- 5:57help turn a general program description
- 5:59into a complete application response.
- 6:02Tip five is to keep one consistent
- 6:05writing style. It is completely fine for
- 6:07multiple people to help write the
- 6:09application, but the final version
- 6:11should sound unified. Watch for changes
- 6:13in language, such as using youth in one
- 6:15section and clients in another. Also,
- 6:18watch for sections that feel too
- 6:20different in tone, grammar, or format.
- 6:23Before submitting, have one strong
- 6:24writer or editor review the full
- 6:26application from beginning to end. Tip
- 6:29six is to check grammar and spelling.
- 6:31This may seem simple, but clean writing
- 6:34makes a difference. Reviewers should be
- 6:36able to focus on the strength of the
- 6:37program, not spelling mistakes or
- 6:39confusing sentences. Build in time for a
- 6:42final proofread. Check spelling,
- 6:44grammar, clarity, formatting, and
- 6:46consistency before clicking submit. Tip
- 6:49seven is to choose your primary areas of
- 6:51service. Do not select every service
- 6:54area just to make the application look
- 6:55stronger. More service areas do not
- 6:58automatically lead to a higher score.
- 7:00Choose the areas that are truly central
- 7:02to your mission and program design. It
- 7:04is better to explain a few core services
- 7:07well than to select too many and provide
- 7:08weak or unclear answers.
- 7:11Education may still be the program's
- 7:13primary service area. Applicants can
- 7:16describe wraparound supports without
- 7:17selecting every support as a separate
- 7:19service area. The primary service area
- 7:22should reflect the program's main focus.
- 7:24Secondary services are additional
- 7:26supports that help youth succeed, but
- 7:28they are not the main purpose of the
- 7:30program.
- 7:32For example, an education program may
- 7:34also provide mentoring, employment
- 7:36support, or life skills support.
- 7:39However, if education is the main focus,
- 7:41the applicant should select education as
- 7:43the primary service area and describe
- 7:46the other supports as part of the
- 7:47overall education model. Tip eight is to
- 7:50include actual data whenever possible.
- 7:53Vague phrases such as many, some, or
- 7:55often do not indicate measurable impact.
- 7:58A stronger answer uses numbers,
- 8:00percentages, time frames, and outcomes.
- 8:03For example, instead of saying many
- 8:05youth earned a GED, say how many youth
- 8:08completed that goal, what percentage
- 8:10that represents and what year or time
- 8:12frame the data comes from.
- 8:15For the Phoenix youth impact category,
- 8:17applicants need to provide stronger
- 8:19measurement and tracking details. This
- 8:21includes the measurement plan, how often
- 8:23data is collected, how goals connect to
- 8:26the mission, and how outputs and
- 8:27outcomes are tracked. Phoenix should
- 8:30reflect the same program or service area
- 8:32described in the flame or fire
- 8:34application. The goal is to show not
- 8:36only that services are happening, but
- 8:38that the organization can clearly
- 8:40measure youth impact. Tip nine is to
- 8:42focus on the present. Reviewers want to
- 8:45understand what the program looks like
- 8:46today. Future plans can be mentioned
- 8:49briefly when they are relevant, but do
- 8:51not describe planned services as if they
- 8:53are already operating. The strongest
- 8:56application focuses on current services,
- 8:58activities, youth experiences, and
- 9:00measurable impact. Tip 10 is to include
- 9:03relevant attachments. Applicants may
- 9:06upload up to five files. These can
- 9:08include videos, brochures, flyers,
- 9:10annual reports, or program materials.
- 9:13The key is that attachment should
- 9:14support the written application, not
- 9:16replace it. Explain the service first in
- 9:19the narrative, then use the attachment
- 9:21as evidence or support. Choose materials
- 9:23that connect directly to the service
- 9:25areas you selected.
- 9:27AO membership through Glueup is highly
- 9:29encouraged because it helps
- 9:31organizations stay connected to updates,
- 9:33resources, templates, trainings,
- 9:36announcements, and community
- 9:37opportunities.
- 9:39However, membership is not required to
- 9:41apply for or win an aging out award.
- 9:43Applicants can still submit an
- 9:45application without joining. Membership
- 9:47is a support tool, not a requirement for
- 9:50eligibility.
- 9:51Before submitting, use this final
- 9:53checklist. Confirm eligibility. Make
- 9:56sure the correct award category is
- 9:58selected. Use the suggested headers.
- 10:00Provide detailed responses. Include
- 10:02actual data. Focus on current services.
- 10:06Upload relevant attachments. Finally,
- 10:08proofread the full application. Taking
- 10:10time to review before submitting can
- 10:12make the application clearer, stronger,
- 10:14and easier for reviewers to score. To
- 10:17apply, visit agingoutawsplatform.com.
- 10:22Thank you for the work you do to support
- 10:24youth aging out of foster care. As you
- 10:26prepare your application, remember to
- 10:28start early, be specific, use data when
- 10:31possible, and show the impact your
- 10:33organization is already making. If you
- 10:35have questions, please contact the
- 10:37agingout awards support team at
- 10:40[email protected]
- 10:42or frankightwayfoundation.org.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of AO Application Tutorial by AO-Awards, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 1,649 words across 284 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.