YouTube2Text

andy hoffman 01 — Transcript

by Michigan Online · 674 words · 124 segments · language en · Watch on YouTube

Full transcript

  1. 0:00why do people reject certain scientific
  2. 0:03inclusions
  3. 0:04why do they reject for example that
  4. 0:06climate change is real something i
  5. 0:07study why do some people reject the idea
  6. 0:10that coven 19 is real
  7. 0:12i want to offer four pieces four ideas
  8. 0:15for your consideration on thinking this
  9. 0:16through
  10. 0:17the first is motivated reasoning and
  11. 0:19what that means is that people readily
  12. 0:21accept something if it confirms their
  13. 0:23worldview
  14. 0:24and they will reject it or dismiss it if
  15. 0:27it challenges their worldview
  16. 0:28on issues that may be totally unrelated
  17. 0:30to the science
  18. 0:32people may say that climate change is
  19. 0:34not real because they do not want to see
  20. 0:37constraints on the market controls on
  21. 0:39fossil fuel sector
  22. 0:42people may have never experienced anyone
  23. 0:44who had coven 19 and therefore dismiss
  24. 0:46it as a liberal plot
  25. 0:48trying to control their lives and so
  26. 0:50motivated reasoning plays a big role
  27. 0:53in whether people accept or reject the
  28. 0:55conclusions of the scientific
  29. 0:56institutions
  30. 0:57the second question is where do those
  31. 0:59filters come from that guide motivated
  32. 1:02reasoning
  33. 1:03and to a large extent they are formed by
  34. 1:05the groups with which we associate
  35. 1:07who is part of our tribe for example
  36. 1:10maybe a way to think about it uh
  37. 1:12um who do you trust for information
  38. 1:16uh we'd like to fit with the groups of
  39. 1:19the
  40. 1:19which we are part it's it's painful it's
  41. 1:21hard
  42. 1:22to be in dissonance with the the values
  43. 1:26of the people we associate with whether
  44. 1:27it's at the university
  45. 1:29or at your local town hall or in your
  46. 1:31business or in your local neighborhood
  47. 1:33we tend to fit with the groups with
  48. 1:35which we associate
  49. 1:37and the second part of that or a piece
  50. 1:39of that is who do we look at trusted
  51. 1:41sources of information
  52. 1:42that represent the values of those
  53. 1:43groups there is actually
  54. 1:45good scientific social science research
  55. 1:48to show
  56. 1:49that the more you watch or listen to fox
  57. 1:51news the less you believe in climate
  58. 1:53change the more you watch or listen to
  59. 1:55npr the more you believe in climate
  60. 1:57change
  61. 1:58our social media does it to it as well
  62. 2:00we create a filter bubble around
  63. 2:01ourselves
  64. 2:03many of you may have unfriended someone
  65. 2:05on facebook or twitter because they were
  66. 2:07posting things that you didn't agree
  67. 2:09with
  68. 2:09we create the filter bubble we um
  69. 2:13disassociate ourselves with people whose
  70. 2:15values our views are different than our
  71. 2:17own
  72. 2:18social media is doing it to us and so uh
  73. 2:21the second
  74. 2:22piece uh what's called cultural
  75. 2:23cognition starts to play in
  76. 2:26the third over time once we connect a
  77. 2:28particular position on a scientific
  78. 2:30issue
  79. 2:31with our social political emotional
  80. 2:34identity
  81. 2:35it's very hard to break that jonathan
  82. 2:37hate
  83. 2:38likes to describe that we're faced with
  84. 2:40complex scientific information
  85. 2:42we approach it more like lawyers than
  86. 2:44like scientists
  87. 2:46we have this emotional visceral response
  88. 2:48the emotions kick in really fast
  89. 2:50and our reason is a distant second and
  90. 2:53so
  91. 2:55our emotion creates a conclusion and our
  92. 2:57reason comes in and tries to information
  93. 2:59find information to confirm that
  94. 3:02conclusion made by our emotions
  95. 3:04and so we come to these decisions
  96. 3:06quickly and we don't work
  97. 3:08often that hard to find disconfirming
  98. 3:10information
  99. 3:11psychologists like to describe that
  100. 3:13we're cognitive misers
  101. 3:15we have a certain amount of cognitive
  102. 3:17ability we spend it very frugally
  103. 3:21the third piece that has to be brought
  104. 3:23in this conversation is that there are
  105. 3:25powerful political and economic
  106. 3:26interests
  107. 3:27that are trying to confuse the
  108. 3:28conversation over particular issues
  109. 3:31whether it's news media or certain
  110. 3:33industry sectors
  111. 3:35that have brought content into the
  112. 3:37conversation in ways
  113. 3:39to try and sway the public one way or
  114. 3:40another all these things
  115. 3:43all four of these items lead to a
  116. 3:45conclusion that
  117. 3:47when you are trying to communicate
  118. 3:48science to a
  119. 3:50public that is not ready to hear it
  120. 3:53in many ways it's helpful to understand
  121. 3:55some of the social science behind
  122. 3:57why they reject it and then you can
  123. 3:59start to take an approach
  124. 4:00to how to overcome it

About this transcript

This page contains the full transcript of andy hoffman 01 by Michigan Online, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 674 words across 124 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.

What you can do with it

Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.

Free YouTube transcript tool

YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.