An Honest Review of Women's Suffrage — Transcript

Full transcript

1. 0:00Women are capable of many things, but
2. 0:02voting well doesn't seem to be one of
3. 0:04them. In their defense, men don't vote
4. 0:06that well either, but they're still
5. 0:07considerably better on average.
6. 0:10In this video, we go over the political
7. 0:12gender gap, the causes behind it, and
8. 0:14some ancient wisdom to give an honest
9. 0:16review of women's suffrage. And if you
10. 0:18enjoyed, consider subscribing. It helps
11. 0:20the channel.
12. 0:21First, let's get some basic things out
13. 0:23the way. Contrary to propaganda, we do
14. 0:25not live in a patriarchy. Collectively,
15. 0:28women have more power in the West than
16. 0:30men do. We live in democracies where
17. 0:32everyone can vote, and women both
18. 0:34outnumber men and have a higher voter
19. 0:37turnout. If women voted as one united
20. 0:40block, they'd win every election.
21. 0:43Secondly, women control education
22. 0:45through sheer numbers. And as anyone of
23. 0:48my generation can attest, will often
24. 0:50force their politics down children's
25. 0:52throats.
26. 0:53Thirdly, women control the professional
27. 0:55environment through HR, again through
28. 0:57numbers. To the point where we've even
29. 0:59had cases of HR ladies on social media
30. 1:02openly saying that if you post
31. 1:04right-wing content, they won't hire you,
32. 1:06and they will ruin your reputation with
33. 1:08other companies. And lastly, the
34. 1:11consistent pro-woman bias in family
35. 1:13court have given them asymmetric
36. 1:15leverage in marriages.
37. 1:17The only power men still have in our
38. 1:20societies are reactive. They have the
39. 1:22power to use force for obvious reasons,
40. 1:25which they simply don't nowadays, and
41. 1:27they have productivity. Because despite
42. 1:30of all the efforts we went through to
43. 1:31get women into the workforce, they have
44. 1:33not occupied the essential jobs that
45. 1:35keep society running. And I doubt the
46. 1:38endless Zoom meetings would be missed.
47. 1:40So, men could theoretically go on
48. 1:42strike, refuse to maintain essential
49. 1:43services, and force change. But as long
50. 1:46as the status quo remains, women
51. 1:48collectively are in charge.
52. 1:51So, what have they done of all this
53. 1:52power?
54. 1:53The Greek playwright Aristophanes,
55. 1:55referred to as the father of comedy,
56. 1:57wrote a play 2,400 years ago where he
57. 2:00predicted the outcomes of what would
58. 2:02happen if women took control of
59. 2:03politics, called The Assembly of Women.
60. 2:06His predictions included massive welfare
61. 2:08expansion and equity focus, enabling
62. 2:11free riding and draining the treasury,
63. 2:13hostility to private property and
64. 2:15private relationships, erosion of the
65. 2:17family unit of the state as a substitute
66. 2:20provider, weakened commitment, chaotic
67. 2:22dating markets, and ironically fears of
68. 2:25female competition, as well as the
69. 2:27punishing of masculine traits leading to
70. 2:29more effeminate men.
71. 2:31Aristophanes was eerily prescient, with
72. 2:33modern voting data showing women, on
73. 2:36average, strongly backing the patterns
74. 2:38he warned about. An eight-to-15-point
75. 2:41swing over men in favor of increasing
76. 2:43welfare beyond its already extensive
77. 2:45size, a 20-point swing in favor over men
78. 2:48in support of increased gun control, and
79. 2:50as much as a 15-point swing over men in
80. 2:52favor of mass immigration. And perhaps
81. 2:55something not even Aristophanes would
82. 2:57have predicted, 56%
83. 2:59in favor of killing their own unborn
84. 3:01kids for any reason. A 15-point gap
85. 3:05compared to men. Looking at the
86. 3:07downstream social effect, declining
87. 3:09families, rising spending, polarization,
88. 3:12Assembly of Women feels less like satire
89. 3:14and more like a warning. There are two
90. 3:17clear patterns here. Firstly, many women
91. 3:20are clearly voting to use the state as a
92. 3:23substitute husband. Instead of men
93. 3:25protecting and providing for their
94. 3:26families, the state does it. But the
95. 3:29irony is the state can only provide for
96. 3:31them by taking resources from men. After
97. 3:35all, the state itself does not produce
98. 3:37anything. In essence, this is a form of
99. 3:39forced disenfranchisement against men.
100. 3:42Men's naturally advantaged ability to
101. 3:44protect and provide was once leveraged
102. 3:46for them in the dating market. Leverage
103. 3:49they could use to get a higher quality
104. 3:51spouse. But by these being forcefully
105. 3:53taken from them and given for free to
106. 3:55women, men's value and agency have been
107. 3:58vastly reduced. One of the only things
108. 4:00nowadays that men get to keep entirely
109. 4:02for themselves is their own physical
110. 4:05attractiveness. Historically, physical
111. 4:07attractiveness is a trait women would
112. 4:09use for more leverage in the dating
113. 4:11market. But, since that's all that men
114. 4:13have left for themselves, it explains
115. 4:15the recent trend of men becoming so
116. 4:17obsessed with their appearance and, as a
117. 4:19result, becoming more effeminate. People
118. 4:21blame dating apps and social media for
119. 4:24the extreme focus on male appearance,
120. 4:26but the fact that so many other aspects
121. 4:28of masculinity have been forcefully
122. 4:30substituted by the state seems like the
123. 4:32greater cause. Since men are now less
124. 4:34incentivized to acquire the necessary
125. 4:37masculine skills to protect and provide,
126. 4:39they'll do so less and focus instead on
127. 4:42more rewarding feminine traits. And as
128. 4:44such, the state will have less and less
129. 4:46masculinity to draw on, ultimately
130. 4:48leading to less provision and protection
131. 4:51for society over time, as we're already
132. 4:54seeing. There is some nuance though,
133. 4:56because while women generally have been
134. 4:58treating the state as a substitute
135. 4:59husband, there are certain groups of
136. 5:01women who will absolutely not vote this
137. 5:03way. And in fact, despise this behavior.
138. 5:06That is, women who themselves have
139. 5:09long-lasting successful relationships
140. 5:11with men. This is intuitive. The less
141. 5:13successful a woman is in establishing a
142. 5:16strong private relationship with a man,
143. 5:18the more likely she is to try to use the
144. 5:20state to redistribute masculinity
145. 5:22towards her. Meanwhile, if a woman is
146. 5:25successful in that pursuit, the less
147. 5:27likely she is to want to share her man.
148. 5:29This is effectively the libertarian
149. 5:31versus welfare debate, except proxy-ed
150. 5:34through relationships. As such,
151. 5:37societies that encourage promiscuity,
152. 5:39polygamy, and non-commitment are
153. 5:41effectively a form of socialism for
154. 5:43undesirable women. As men and women
155. 5:46continue to drift apart and fail to
156. 5:48establish long-standing relationships,
157. 5:50the more appealing this form of
158. 5:52socialism becomes for them. This again
159. 5:54mirrors Aristophanes' prediction, where
160. 5:57in the play the assembly women forced
161. 5:59men's attention to be shared with less
162. 6:01desirable women. The second pattern of
163. 6:03female voting is supporting whatever the
164. 6:05current thing is. I gave you the stats
165. 6:08about modern-day voting issues, where
166. 6:10you see women giving significantly more
167. 6:12support to liberal mainstream ideology.
168. 6:15That we've all been taught in school.
169. 6:17But, if we rewind the clock some decades
170. 6:19back to when mainstream institutions
171. 6:21were conservative, you'd see women being
172. 6:23more conservative than men.
173. 6:25Why? Because it was the current thing.
174. 6:28Women are, on average, more agreeable
175. 6:31than men. A consequence of agreeableness
176. 6:34is the fear of going against the
177. 6:35perceived consensus. As such, women
178. 6:38operate less as independent voters, but
179. 6:41rather as parrots of institutions. If
180. 6:44the dominant institutions are
181. 6:45conservative, women will broadly be
182. 6:48conservative. If they're liberal, women
183. 6:50will broadly be liberal. Naturally,
184. 6:52parroting the dominant opinion is not
185. 6:54helpful in politics and actually
186. 6:56reinforces political entrenchment,
187. 6:59facilitating corruption, lack of
188. 7:01scrutiny, and dogmatism. A deeper issue
189. 7:04of suffrage is its effect on the family
190. 7:06unit. In healthy societies with strong
191. 7:09families, husbands and wives are
192. 7:11aligned. They'll vote the same, making
193. 7:13the extra votes redundant. However, now
194. 7:16you have the political incentive to
195. 7:18appeal not to families, but to
196. 7:21individuals.
197. 7:22And if your platform is generally more
198. 7:24appealing to women, especially single
199. 7:26women, but not to men, you are now
200. 7:28incentivized to push policies that
201. 7:30sabotage or delay family formation. Or
202. 7:33to get wives to vote against their
203. 7:35husbands, which causes marital rift and
204. 7:37has happened in recent campaigns. After
205. 7:39all, as we've established, generally
206. 7:41women in successful marriages will not
207. 7:44vote for the state as a substitute
208. 7:46husband, thus diminishing your power.
209. 7:48This means that at best, women's
210. 7:50suffrage is largely redundant, and at
211. 7:52worst, it politically incentivizes the
212. 7:54subversion of the family, and therefore,
213. 7:57the future of your nation.
214. 7:59Additionally, this is a weakness that's
215. 8:01unique to women's suffrage. As while you
216. 8:03can somewhat use the state as a
217. 8:04substitute husband for the roles of
218. 8:06protector and provider, the state is
219. 8:09incapable of providing men with what
220. 8:11they'd want from a wife. The market, on
221. 8:13the other hand, fully exploits single
222. 8:15men. But that's a topic for another day.
223. 8:18So, here's my honest review of women's
224. 8:20suffrage. We're now in a situation where
225. 8:22family formation is at an all-time low,
226. 8:25reckless government spending at an
227. 8:26all-time high, men and women are
228. 8:28lonelier and more depressed than ever,
229. 8:30dominant political institutions are more
230. 8:32entrenched than ever, and every single
231. 8:34policy that led to these outcomes are
232. 8:36consistently upheld by the female vote.
233. 8:39In a way so predictable, the ancient
234. 8:41Greeks were laughing at us over 2,000
235. 8:43years ago. Zero out of 10 would not
236. 8:46recommend opening the door for total
237. 8:48societal collapse again.