Amazon Shareholders‼️ Major New Developments — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00Let's talk about some amazing on. And
- 0:02then, you know what I'll do? I'll tell
- 0:04you what my favorite mag seven stocks
- 0:07are to buy right now. Like, what's my
- 0:08favorite one? Which one's the best buy?
- 0:11And then,
- 0:13uh, which one's maybe I'm least
- 0:14interested in.
- 0:14>> to its aggressive AI spending plans. So,
- 0:16that has not changed. The company
- 0:18continuing to project
- 0:19>> No, no, no. Let's do it right now. Let's
- 0:20do it right now before we get into this
- 0:22video. What's my
- 0:24What's the best buy in mag seven right
- 0:25now for a long-term investor? What's the
- 0:28worst buy?
- 0:29Uh, worst buy
- 0:31Tesla. You know, Tesla least interesting
- 0:34of the bunch by a large margin.
- 0:37Uh, best I would say
- 0:44It's tough. It's really tough right now
- 0:47because valuations have gotten more
- 0:49compelling.
- 0:52I would say the most attractive risk
- 0:55reward right now
- 0:58is
- 1:02[sighs]
- 1:04I've got to give it to Amazon. It's
- 1:09tough though. It's very tough because
- 1:11there's a The close second right behind
- 1:13it is Meta, and the close third behind
- 1:16it is Google. Like, those companies are
- 1:18like all three of them I think are are
- 1:21really interesting buys. Google really
- 1:23got my attention with this latest
- 1:24quarterly results. Uh, you know, Wall
- 1:27Street walked away from that very
- 1:28negative. I walked away from those
- 1:30results for Google feeling the best I
- 1:33felt about Google in quite some time.
- 1:34Obviously, it's a smaller position for
- 1:36me in the public account, but I walked
- 1:37away
- 1:38I walked away from those results feeling
- 1:40even better about Google than Meta and
- 1:42Amazon. Right? And that doesn't mean I
- 1:44feel bad about I mean, Meta Meta I kind
- 1:46of feel a little bad about. That one's
- 1:48just like the spend's out of control and
- 1:50they just don't have the business lined
- 1:53up to really generate these crazy growth
- 1:56rates. Right? Um, we're hoping like Muse
- 1:59can be something big but we don't have
- 2:01any definitive proof.
- 2:02With AWS, at least you got the growth
- 2:04rates, right? Like they're putting up
- 2:05the growth rates 39% they're talking
- 2:08about 40% plus next year and the year
- 2:10after. Like you you got something there,
- 2:12right? Something real. Google, the
- 2:15growth rates are insane for Google
- 2:16Cloud.
- 2:18100 and you know 3%
- 2:21latest quarter like it's got the growth,
- 2:23right? So
- 2:24yeah, you know
- 2:26outside of that Apple is not super
- 2:29interesting. I don't think it's it's
- 2:30horrible. I think Microsoft's actually a
- 2:32pretty interesting buy. We ran
- 2:33valuations on that. It probably I I
- 2:36would say likely produces a teens
- 2:40a teens
- 2:42return per year for the next four or
- 2:45five years.
- 2:47So let's call something between like 13%
- 2:49and maybe 19% returner. So that's good.
- 2:51Solid. It should beat the market over
- 2:53the next four years.
- 2:56And then who else Nvidia is a decent
- 2:59buy, but I don't love it here, you know.
- 3:02I would still much rather be in AMD.
- 3:04Like AMD has real potential to double
- 3:06and triple in the next 24 months
- 3:09to 36 months. AMD double and triple in
- 3:12the next 36 months very unrealistic in
- 3:13my opinion because we going to have
- 3:15those much slower growth rates, you
- 3:17know, starting at the end of next year
- 3:18and then moving into future years. So
- 3:21Okie dokie. Let's go ahead and react to
- 3:23Wall Street.
- 3:23>> The the the capital expenditures of $220
- 3:26billion for the year. That's a forecast
- 3:29that sent the shares lower and joining
- 3:31us right now to break down some of those
- 3:32numbers Mark Mahaney is Evercore head of
- 3:34internet research. Good morning to you.
- 3:38I wasn't that surprised by their
- 3:40numbers, Mark, but I'm surprised that
- 3:42the market's taken it the way it has
- 3:44given maybe the way they reacted to some
- 3:47of the Google numbers, but the Google
- 3:48story's kind of different. What do you
- 3:50think is going on here?
- 3:52>> Well, I I think you're right. There is a
- 3:53big difference between Google results
- 3:55and the Meta results and these results,
- 3:57but all three of them had pretty strong
- 4:00negative market reactions. With Amazon
- 4:02it's three things. The
- 4:04the market wanted 40% plus, you know,
- 4:07low 40s AWS growth, and it only got 39
- 4:09%. It accelerated, but not by as much as
- 4:12the market wanted. The market got 12% ad
- 4:15revenue growth, and the market didn't
- 4:17wanted something more like 18 19 %. So
- 4:19that was a disappointment. And then the
- 4:21cash flow came in worse than expected.
- 4:23The Street was thinking maybe 10 billion
- 4:25in negative free cash flow. It came in
- 4:26at a record amount that was closer to
- 4:29the 30 billion. I I think there answers
- 4:31to all three of these. I I think this is
- 4:33what's called a what I call an
- 4:34expectations correction, not a
- 4:35fundamentals correction. AWS revenue
- 4:37growth accelerated for the sixth
- 4:39straight quarter
- 4:41in a row. And then they laid out these
- 4:42goals for the next two years of 40% plus
- 4:45AWS growth. At that scale, I think
- 4:47that's really impressive, and the
- 4:48margins were good at at AWS. Advertising
- 4:51just had some comp issues, and they went
- 4:52out of their way to kind of normalize
- 4:54the ad revenue growth rate and pretty
- 4:56strongly suggest it's going to get back
- 4:58closer to 20% high teens in the next
- 5:01quarter. And then the the the negative
- 5:03record free cash flow, well, that's
- 5:05because the CAPEX got pulled forward.
- 5:07They didn't change the CAPEX for the
- 5:08full year. It's just that it was a lot
- 5:10heavier in Q3 than the Street had
- 5:12expected, which actually means Q4 is
- 5:14going to have positive free cash flow.
- 5:16So, you know, look, this company is
- 5:17still going through a major investment
- 5:19cycle, but I I I look at this as an
- 5:20overreaction. I like Amazon as a stock.
- 5:23It's a
- 5:24Yeah, it's a number one pick, and it's
- 5:25my number one buy even here off the
- 5:27correction. I didn't I don't like
- 5:28corrections on my top picks, but, you
- 5:30know, it's happened, and I understand
- 5:32why. I just think they're answers to all
- 5:34three of those main major concerns.
- 5:36>> Okay, so 226 bucks, if we're sitting
- 5:38here together a year from now, what do
- 5:39you think it's worth?
- 5:41>> Well, I think this thing gets back to
- 5:43I think this thing gets back to doing
- 5:45like 25 times earnings. I think what the
- 5:46market needs to see are two or three
- 5:48things. They need to see the we need to
- 5:50see the end the light at the end of the
- 5:51tunnel in terms of this free cash flow
- 5:53hole that the company's going to go
- 5:55through next year. I think it's going to
- 5:56be about 50 billion in negative free
- 5:58cash
- 5:58>> This is where I think everybody's making
- 5:59a big mistake. Big mistake with these
- 6:02big tech companies, okay? Big mistake.
- 6:05Listen.
- 6:06Don't
- 6:07assume like these companies to like just
- 6:10their stocks are going to go crazy over
- 6:11the next year, right? It's possible, but
- 6:13I I wouldn't be super bullish on them
- 6:15necessarily in the very short term,
- 6:17meaning the next 6 to 12 months. Is it
- 6:19possible Amazon, you know, over the next
- 6:2012 months goes to 300 plus and Meta goes
- 6:23to 900 and blah blah blah. It's
- 6:25possible, but I'm just like they they
- 6:27these companies do have a lot of
- 6:28headwinds, right? They got the economy,
- 6:30which the consumer's in a weaker spot.
- 6:32We know that. Look at the consumer
- 6:33sentiment, look at the company numbers.
- 6:35We're just seeing a lot of weak numbers
- 6:37across the board
- 6:38for anything that's really dealing with
- 6:39the consumer. The AI related stuff for
- 6:41like business is spending is fine, but
- 6:44anything consumer related looks weak
- 6:45right now, very very weak, right?
- 6:47So that's something to kind of keep in
- 6:48mind there. And and and so
- 6:53you know,
- 6:54I would say
- 6:56don't get your hopes up that these
- 6:58stocks are going to go blasting higher
- 7:00in the short term. Like I'm just like,
- 7:02you know, like you really need to be
- 7:04thinking about these sorts of companies
- 7:05in a 5 year span. If you're thinking
- 7:07about just over the next 12 months,
- 7:09you're going to be set up for
- 7:09disappointment.
- 7:11Like I'm not getting my hopes up around
- 7:13any of these stocks, Amazon, Meta,
- 7:14Google, any of these big techs. I'm not
- 7:17getting my The only one I would say I
- 7:18have my hopes up on and that I think
- 7:21could blast higher in the shorter term
- 7:23is AMD, right? AMD. Outside of that, no.
- 7:27>> Slow next year, but is if we can go
- 7:29through next year and get some
- 7:31confidence that that's the that's the
- 7:32worst of the of the that that's the
- 7:35trough of the free cash flow loss, then
- 7:38and I think that's what's going to
- 7:39happen. We'll probably know that, I
- 7:40don't know, a quarter or two into the
- 7:42year, then I think you'll get a real
- 7:43unlock on the stock. Also I'm looking
- 7:45for new product catalysts and there's
- 7:47one coming. It's launching and that's
- 7:48Project Leo, which is going to go
- 7:50commercial by the end before the end of
- 7:52this year. That'll also actually be very
- 7:54beneficial for the P&L because they'll
- 7:55start capitalizing some of those
- 7:57manufacturing
- 7:59expenses. So those are the those those
- 8:01are the two things I'm really looking
- 8:02for, but it's most important for I think
- 8:04for investors is show me when uh can I
- 8:06get confidence that the worst uh of the
- 8:09the free cash flow losses is is behind
- 8:11me?
- 8:12>> Yeah, and Mark, really, it's the street
- 8:14wants to to know that the capex that's
- 8:16being spent right now does have a
- 8:19a way to profitability. Last night on
- 8:22the earnings call, Andy Jassy said that
- 8:24he sees a clear line of sight to
- 8:26profitability for all of this. Do you?
- 8:30>> Uh yeah, and I think there's some
- 8:31evidence right in the numbers. I mean,
- 8:33the uh the margins at AWS are close to a
- 8:3540% and if they can do they can keep
- 8:37margins relatively close to where they
- 8:39are today and grow 40% top line the next
- 8:422 years, I mean, you're going to get uh
- 8:44you're going to get back to substantial
- 8:46free cash flow perhaps as early as 28
- 8:49and very likely in 29. So yeah, I think
- 8:52so. And then they also gave you a
- 8:53backlog number. Their backlog grew 80
- 8:56billion sequentially and there wasn't
- 8:57any one deal in there. It was very
- 8:59diverse set of um uh new deals that were
- 9:02signed up. So I just think you have a
- 9:03lot of visibility into demand and the
- 9:06track record that they're showing with
- 9:08their cloud business, the most important
- 9:09one is showing rising margins. By the
- 9:11way, as a company as a whole gave you
- 9:13record operating margins last night and
- 9:16I think those margins are going to
- 9:17continue to move higher uh in the next
- 9:19couple of years. You're at record
- 9:20operating cash flow. So it's really a
- 9:22matter of when the capex spend
- 9:25>> Amazon stands for always abide, baby.
- 9:29Hey, it's Jeremy. I hope you really
- 9:30enjoyed that clip here today. What
- 9:33you're looking at in front of you right
- 9:34there, that's the six figure hall of
- 9:37fame. Do you want to see the next one?
- 9:39That's the seven figure hall of fame.
- 9:42Now, that is my private group. Those are
- 9:44members of my private group that have
- 9:45scaled to six figures, multi six
- 9:47figures, seven figures, multi seven
- 9:49figures in their stock market portfolio.
- 9:51They say you are the average of the five
- 9:53people you associate with. If you're
- 9:55somebody that is having trouble finding
- 9:57other long-term investors that are
- 9:59focused on building their wealth over
- 10:01the coming years, finding like-minded
- 10:02folks, look no further than my private
- 10:04group. We got a tremendous amount of
- 10:06people. We're consistently talking with
- 10:08each other, learning from each other,
- 10:10researching companies together, sharing
- 10:12news about our different companies,
- 10:14right? We do all that inside my private
- 10:17group. If you would like to apply to
- 10:19join us in there, go down to the
- 10:21description area. There'll be an
- 10:22application down there. You can click on
- 10:24that and you can apply to join us in
- 10:26there and take your game up to a much
- 10:28higher level and associate with the type
- 10:31of folks that you actually want to
- 10:32associate with. Tom Lee.
- 10:36>> In this cauldron.
- 10:38Yeah, exactly. We got tricks on Friday
- 10:41on mischief night. Overall though, and
- 10:44and I don't know, you're not jumping up
- 10:46and down like sometimes you do, but you
- 10:48still think maybe 8,200 by the end of
- 10:53this year.
- 10:54You
- 10:54you you want to say that or you want to
- 10:57sort of say it or you want to say it
- 10:58this way or
- 11:00you you think it's going to happen?
- 11:02>> Yeah, I think we are.
- 11:03>> Okay.
- 11:04>> I do think markets are going to exit the
- 11:06year strong,
- 11:07but they have been struggling, you know?
- 11:09Like underneath the surface, it's been a
- 11:11real battle and
- 11:13I think everyone I speak to is nervous
- 11:15about one of many things, right? The
- 11:17war,
- 11:18AI spending, the debt markets, the Fed,
- 11:22inflation, midterms, and I think
- 11:25the market's held up really well in the
- 11:27face of all that. And as you know,
- 11:28markets climb a wall of worry. So I
- 11:30think if we get some clearing of any of
- 11:33these things, then
- 11:35we can really see money come off the
- 11:36sidelines.
- 11:38>> And just to get one of them out of the
- 11:40way in terms of a clearing event, you
- 11:41think the midterms will be a clearing
- 11:43event? And
- 11:45Donald Trump is not on well, he says
- 11:47he's on the ballot. Maybe he is in in in
- 11:49some ways, but he's not and he the veto
- 11:51pen will be intact even if both
- 11:54houses of Congress go
- 11:57to the Democrats. So you still view that
- 11:59as gridlock, which is not going to be
- 12:01that much of a a surprise to the
- 12:03markets.
- 12:04>> Correct. I think markets in some ways
- 12:06prefer gridlock because then you don't
- 12:08have too much policy creep.
- 12:10So the presidential vetoes is still very
- 12:14I do think one thing that
- 12:16investors are worried about is like data
- 12:18centers if the Democrats take the Senate
- 12:20and house.
- 12:22But I I'm going to take the contrarian
- 12:23view that
- 12:25Democrat house Democrats will support AI
- 12:29post midterms because it does bring
- 12:31money to their communities. So I think
- 12:32it's sort of a an important voting issue
- 12:35today, but I think at the end of the day
- 12:37it's good for jobs and it's good for the
- 12:38economy.
- 12:39>> Right. It definitely was a political
- 12:41football for both
- 12:43both parties. Do you
- 12:44you have a you know
- 12:47sort of a non-consensus you have a lot
- 12:49of things.
- 12:51Do you have a view on prediction
- 12:52markets? Are they better than polls or
- 12:54are they based on polls? Do do you think
- 12:56there's any surprises, major surprises
- 12:59possible on Tuesday or you think they
- 13:01get it right this time?
- 13:02>> One thing I'm wrestling with is in 2024
- 13:05the prediction markets varied so much
- 13:08from the polls.
- 13:10They were in 2024 they showed Donald
- 13:12Trump very strong
- 13:14relative to the polls and I thought that
- 13:16was a lot of signal.
- 13:18But in this 2026 midterm the polls and
- 13:22the prediction markets are almost the
- 13:23same.
- 13:24So I'm not sure they're generating
- 13:26signal
- 13:28on the margin
- 13:29cuz they're both basically showing a
- 13:31democratic sweep.
- 13:33And that's why I think it'll be
- 13:34interesting cuz I I think a lot of the
- 13:36folks like that I know in Texas are
- 13:38saying that Texas could be a surprise
- 13:41where
- 13:43you know maybe the Republicans fare
- 13:45better than we expect. So I don't it's a
- 13:47good question, but I I don't think it's
- 13:49as much signal as it was in 2024.
- 13:51>> Right.
- 13:52Just the
- 13:54I don't know how polls are conducted at
- 13:56this point. Is it still on on mobile
- 13:58phone?
- 13:59>> Kind of wasting Tom Lee's time there in
- 14:01my opinion. All my exes live in Texas
- 14:03like I'm George Strait.
- 14:05You know
- 14:06I said what I said about the election
- 14:08stuff like that's here today gone
- 14:09tomorrow like you know market could
- 14:11freak over that tomorrow and the next
- 14:13few days and then not even care about it
- 14:15anymore. And that's why at the end of
- 14:18the day,
- 14:19listen, you want to make a lot of money
- 14:20in the stock market,
- 14:22you have to have the ability to look
- 14:25past
- 14:27everything.
- 14:29Like that's just the truth.
- 14:31You have to have the ability to look
- 14:33past
- 14:34geopolitical conflicts. You have to have
- 14:36the ability to look past elections.
- 14:39You have to have the ability to look
- 14:41past
- 14:42everything that could mean a once in a
- 14:45hundred year health event, 2020.
- 14:49It doesn't matter what it is. You have
- 14:51to be able to look
- 14:53right past it.
- 14:54Whatever you're whatever you agreed with
- 14:56in the short term. And it doesn't matter
- 14:58if it's a great financial crisis and you
- 14:59got credit completely collapsed um and
- 15:02lending completely dry up, right? And
- 15:05the market go down 50%. Doesn't matter
- 15:08what happens. You have to be able to
- 15:09look past it. And uh
- 15:12that's the difference between being able
- 15:13to make a lot of money in this game or
- 15:15get sidetracked by all those short-term
- 15:18side shows that go on. Bill Ackman.
- 15:21>> Question kind of plays into some of your
- 15:22investments too. Elliott Investment
- 15:25Management had uh its October letter to
- 15:27investors that was out this morning or
- 15:29it was out this for in October. The Wall
- 15:31Street Journal has a story in this
- 15:32morning's paper looking at it. They're
- 15:35saying they're comparing this time to
- 15:36the Roaring Twenties that led to the
- 15:38Great Depression. They're worried about
- 15:40several things that they listed. Uh one
- 15:42is debt finance capital spending that's
- 15:44out there, circular AI infrastructure
- 15:47deals. And then they laid out this
- 15:49growing pushback and backlash towards AI
- 15:52and and how we're seeing that play out.
- 15:54Do you share those concerns or do you
- 15:56think that there's a different way to
- 15:57see it?
- 15:57>> I don't see a Roaring Twenties in the
- 15:59stock market. Uh you know, if anything
- 16:01this year earnings expectations have
- 16:02gone up meaningfully and the multiple is
- 16:04is is actually reasonably low uh
- 16:06relative to the the growth inherent in
- 16:08the market. So I'm not seeing that sort
- 16:09of bubble-like activity in markets. I
- 16:11think in private markets I would say
- 16:13you're seeing a little bit more uh
- 16:15what uh bubble-like activity
- 16:17particularly in the kind of FOMO,
- 16:19you know, private venture space, there
- 16:20is some, but a lot of it is justified.
- 16:23You know, I I met with the
- 16:25Ramp team. Unbelievably impressive
- 16:28company. If I were at American Express,
- 16:30I would be concerned, but they're
- 16:31building basically a financial operating
- 16:32system
- 16:33for every company in the world. Super
- 16:36impressive team, growing at this massive
- 16:38rate. You know, I think they justify the
- 16:40valuations that they're in. So
- 16:42I'm not saying that anything looks like
- 16:43the 1920s.
- 16:45Where I worry again, you your point on
- 16:48the short-term stuff I think is bad. One
- 16:49day options, people using a lot of
- 16:51mental leverage, a lot of money being,
- 16:53you know, betting on the outcome of
- 16:55sports.
- 16:56Short-term stuff I think
- 16:57>> It's crazy this is even a headline,
- 17:00right? And I'm obviously a huge Amazon
- 17:01shareholder. It's one of my biggest
- 17:03positions across, you know, my
- 17:05public portfolios and private portfolios
- 17:07and all that stuff, right?
- 17:09Amazon's more likely to win in retail
- 17:10than than competitors, right? Listen,
- 17:13like why why is Amazon primed to
- 17:15continue to win in retail for, you know,
- 17:19the next 10 20 plus years easily even in
- 17:22the AI wave, right? You got to ask
- 17:24yourself that. I'll give it I'll put it
- 17:26to you very simple.
- 17:28Supply chain,
- 17:30distribution,
- 17:32transportation. Everything has to get
- 17:35sent somewhere, right? And the one
- 17:38company that is most well positioned be
- 17:40be, you know, you you can't replicate
- 17:43what Amazon's been able to do in in
- 17:45terms of that sort of scale of
- 17:48you know, the warehouses and, you know,
- 17:51the the trucks and the planes and all
- 17:53those sorts of things like that. It's
- 17:54just
- 17:56that's crazy. Like that's a crazy build
- 17:58out, right? And
- 18:00and to be able to make it work on a
- 18:02margin profile front, oh,
- 18:04it's it's so
- 18:06it's so nearly impossible. It's not even
- 18:08funny, right? And no one's been able to
- 18:10try it. Then that's very different than
- 18:12the physical retail space, right? You
- 18:14know, obviously Walmart won the most,
- 18:17right? But you had a lot of other
- 18:18companies that was were able to build
- 18:20something somewhat similar, not nearly
- 18:22as successful as Walmart, but they built
- 18:24something somewhat similar in terms of
- 18:25the distribution of, you know, in in the
- 18:27warehouses and all sorts of things,
- 18:29right? Target, obviously still a very
- 18:31successful company, they did it, right?
- 18:32Just on a smaller scale than Walmart.
- 18:34You had Kmart back in the day, they
- 18:35ended up going bankrupt, but they did
- 18:36it, right? You had Sears, you had many
- 18:38other companies, right? But um at the
- 18:40end of the day, like
- 18:43you don't have anybody that has built
- 18:46out the distribution the way Amazon has
- 18:48built it out just focused on e-com,
- 18:50right? You can say, well Walmart done
- 18:51it, but Walmart really did it based on
- 18:53physical retail, right? And so that's
- 18:56that's special. Like like that is
- 18:58special. What Amazon's been able to pull
- 19:00off is very very special and uh Amazon's
- 19:03just a company you can buy and hold and
- 19:06not worry about. You know, obviously
- 19:08your stock price is going to move all
- 19:09around short term, but if you're just
- 19:11thinking out over the next 5 10 15 20
- 19:13years of a stock you can buy a lot of
- 19:16shares in over time and just hold
- 19:19through all the crap. Oh my gosh, like
- 19:22Amazon's just a winner winner chicken
- 19:23dinner and will likely outperform the
- 19:24S&P 500 in a severe way.
- 19:27>> At one day options, people using a lot
- 19:29of amount of leverage, a lot of money
- 19:31being, you know, betting on the outcome
- 19:32of sports.
- 19:33>> And the best part is the retail business
- 19:35of Amazon, it's not even it's not even
- 19:38it's the most important business. Like
- 19:40that's the most shocking thing of that
- 19:42because we all go to Amazon all the time
- 19:43to buy stuff and all those Amazon trucks
- 19:45driving all over, you know, our
- 19:47neighborhoods and all that stuff. And
- 19:49it's like that's not even their most
- 19:50important business. That's like a second
- 19:53like business compared to AWS. That's
- 19:56wild, man.
- 19:57>> That's where I think there's some
- 19:58definitely some fluff.
- 19:59>> Um let me ask you a different question.
- 20:01It relates maybe to the midterms and
- 20:02beyond. It's a political question, but
- 20:04it's an AI question, which is how much
- 20:06do you worry if you look at an Amazon,
- 20:08uh a Meta, uh some of the others where
- 20:11data centers are going to be the
- 20:12business
- 20:14and that becomes a political football.
- 20:16Uh I don't know if you saw
- 20:17El Sayed, if you think he's going to win
- 20:18in Michigan is saying that he wants a
- 20:20pause on AI. It's a it's a conversation
- 20:22you hear
- 20:24And what kind of headwind you think that
- 20:25poses?
- 20:27>> I think uh you know, it's a global race
- 20:30for super intelligence. We don't want to
- 20:32get there second, right? That's That's
- 20:34existential to the United States. I
- 20:36think there are plenty of states that
- 20:38would be delighted to have the jobs uh
- 20:40the job creation and you know, we got a
- 20:42lot of land mass in the United States.
- 20:44Uh I think
- 20:44>> So you're not worried about it? It's not
- 20:46something you think becomes a broader
- 20:48topic of conversation
- 20:49>> I just think we have I think we have no
- 20:50choice. It's like you know, saying we
- 20:52want to slow down the pace of
- 20:53electricity penetration into America,
- 20:56right? It's going to give people
- 20:57Uh so I I I think we
- 21:00I think it's a good Maybe it helps win a
- 21:02few votes going into midterms, but
- 21:04practically speaking, we can't slow down
- 21:06our
- 21:07our We have to be uh primary in AI.
- 21:10>> Was that
- 21:11really your tweet the other I I'm
- 21:12looking at to make sure that it was
- 21:13yours cuz I wanted to retweet it and
- 21:15then I said, you know what? I don't need
- 21:17it.
- 21:17>> Which tweet is this?
- 21:19>> It's about
- 21:20these current state of of the midterms
- 21:22and some of the candidates
- 21:24>> So here's the thing, right? You know,
- 21:26cuz obviously worries about like, oh, if
- 21:28the the Democrats win, it's going to
- 21:30they're going to block all the data
- 21:31centers. Listen, no. Listen, listen,
- 21:33listen. Have you ever
- 21:35flown in an airplane before and just
- 21:37like
- 21:38looked outside? It's just like
- 21:40United States, we got what? 330 million
- 21:43people or whatever live here
- 21:45and we live like nowhere. Like like the
- 21:47whole dang country is like not even
- 21:49developed. You know what I mean? Like
- 21:50like the amount of land that's just
- 21:52available is insane. So let's say
- 21:55there's some push back in some cities
- 21:56and they want to push these data centers
- 21:59further out, right?
- 22:01Push them out further. That's fine. Like
- 22:03you know, a lot of these data centers
- 22:04are being built now
- 22:06not even on the grid. They're They're
- 22:09having their own electric infrastructure
- 22:11and um
- 22:13and what not built
- 22:15for the data center, almost like a
- 22:17miniature grid, right? So
- 22:20the truth is like with these data
- 22:22centers, maybe there could be more
- 22:24regulations and things like that, but it
- 22:26all just gets worked through. Like, you
- 22:28know, maybe that slows things down a
- 22:30little bit, worst case scenario, but
- 22:32it's not like, oh, it's all over, we're
- 22:34finished, we're done, right? I guess
- 22:36it's just crazy, okay?
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of Amazon Shareholders‼️ Major New Developments by Jeremy Lefebvre Clips , generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 4,372 words across 683 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to choose a caption track available on the video.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, caption language selection, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.