AI Expert Proposes Hard Rule to Separate "AI Slop" from Legitimate AI-Assisted Writing — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00All right, now on to some technology
- 0:01news. For the first time ever, we have a
- 0:05line that someone has proposed as to
- 0:08what makes something AI-assisted and
- 0:11what makes something AI slop. I'm very
- 0:15curious what you think about this line,
- 0:17but it's an actual bright line between
- 0:19slop and quality. Jonathan, what are the
- 0:22details?
- 0:23>> According to Mike Taylor, who's the head
- 0:25of Evals at Every and co-author of
- 0:28O'Reilly's 2024 book Prompt Engineering
- 0:31for Generative AI, he posted a hard rule
- 0:34for AI-assisted writing on Friday. He
- 0:36says, "AI writing is only allowed if
- 0:40your input tokens are greater than your
- 0:43output tokens." And he drew the line
- 0:45with two prompts. Write me an article on
- 0:48X is slop. Here's an hour of my hard-won
- 0:51experience on X, write it up, is
- 0:54actually morally defensible and it will
- 0:55lead to good writing even if AI wrote
- 0:58the final draft. So, what's the
- 1:00distillation ratio? Taylor told writers
- 1:02to divide input tokens by the tokens in
- 1:05the finished draft.
- 1:06Input covers the first idea plus
- 1:08everything that steers it along the way.
- 1:11Then the quotient is the distillation
- 1:13ratio. The graphic on the same post
- 1:15walks through one pass. So, there were
- 1:1630,000 3,000 tokens of guidance. 63.3%
- 1:21were initial ideas and there was 36%
- 1:23editorial guidance along the way. And
- 1:25there were 385 tokens in the finished
- 1:28draft. That is a 7.9 to 1 distillation
- 1:31ratio.
- 1:32A token is the unit that a language
- 1:34model used to count text. His test case
- 1:36poured almost eight tokens of human
- 1:38thought into every token that came out
- 1:40of the AI.
- 1:41>> So, we covered last week a traditional
- 1:43publisher published an AI-assisted book
- 1:47by an author and unapologetically.
- 1:50And that author had over a million words
- 1:54of material and the author used AI to
- 1:57synthesize those million words into
- 1:5950,000 words, 100,000 words of a book.
- 2:02And that publisher is not getting much
- 2:05pushback. We were expecting there to be
- 2:06all this drama over this story cuz it's
- 2:08a traditional publisher using AI. But
- 2:11the thing is is that if you use this
- 2:13rule of thumb or
- 2:15tokens in versus tokens out, it's the
- 2:18author's ideas.
- 2:19The author with his, you know, all his
- 2:21speeches and blog posts and Instagrams
- 2:24and all the things he'd done before the
- 2:25book came out, had generated all of this
- 2:28tokens of knowledge, and the AI
- 2:30contributed very little
- 2:32uh in terms of new content, right? It
- 2:34was mostly carving down what he had in
- 2:38and focusing it rather than adding. And
- 2:41I I don't know if I agree with the with
- 2:43the 50/50 ratio and and I think
- 2:46moralizing it is a mistake, but
- 2:49I do like
- 2:51tokens in and tokens out as a um
- 2:55measurement tool because any author
- 2:58who's only using AI for typesetting, or
- 3:00sorry, for proofreading, let's say, you
- 3:01know, fixing uh typos and stuff, they're
- 3:04like 99.5%
- 3:06tokens in and 0.5% tokens out, right?
- 3:09They have a really high ratio, and
- 3:10that's why they feel really safe.
- 3:12Whereas the person who's like, "Write me
- 3:14a story about a boy who learns to become
- 3:15a man."
- 3:17and then it writes the whole book,
- 3:18right? That's going to be slop cuz the
- 3:20AI's making all of the decisions. You've
- 3:21contributed very little in terms of
- 3:24tokens. And I think we can all agree on
- 3:26the edges, right? I think almost
- 3:28everyone is okay with using a spell
- 3:30checker.
- 3:31Um
- 3:32I'd actually love more people to say,
- 3:33"No, you should be using a dictionary."
- 3:34because using the dictionary will help
- 3:35increase your knowledge of the English
- 3:37language and will broaden the
- 3:39vocabulary.
- 3:40>> way more of a skill set. Why is that the
- 3:41one that people are like totally okay
- 3:43with? Like, "No, you should know how to
- 3:44spell."
- 3:46>> Having a It used to be that authors
- 3:48would have a dictionary and a thesaurus
- 3:49next to their typewriter, and they would
- 3:51use it to help expand their
- 3:54understanding of the English language.
- 3:56Now, they just get a little red
- 3:57squiggly, they right-click, and they
- 3:58accept the change. And
- 4:00we maybe were too quick to throw to
- 4:02accept the spell check. But it's okay,
- 4:03we've all accepted the spell check. So,
- 4:05for the sake of argument, let's assume
- 4:07we all agree on the spell check.
- 4:09And we I think almost all of us disagree
- 4:11or
- 4:12reject the write me a story about a boy
- 4:14who learns to become a man. That's not
- 4:16enough input. And so, where in that
- 4:20everyone's in fighting and canceling
- 4:21each other because everyone's using
- 4:22wherever they're standing as the
- 4:24standard. And if you're more accepting
- 4:26than I am, then you're evil. And if
- 4:27you're less accepting than I am, then
- 4:29you're evil. Everyone should agree with
- 4:30me exactly.
- 4:31>> masking again, right? It's like when do
- 4:33you mask, where do you mask? Oh, I mask
- 4:35here, but you don't. It's
- 4:38>> [laughter]
- 4:39>> or the cloth diapers versus disposable
- 4:41diapers war that always takes place.
- 4:44>> If you don't mask in your car, you will
- 4:46die, Jonathan.
- 4:48>> And I can't believe your child you let
- 4:50your child wear diapers that are not
- 4:52reusable. Like
- 4:54landfills, yo.
- 4:55>> Yeah, so let us know what you think of
- 4:56this tokens in, tokens out way of
- 4:58thinking of it, and where you cut the
- 5:00line and using this as a differentiator.
- 5:03Thanks for watching Author Update,
- 5:05publishing news that actually matters to
- 5:07your career. If you're lurking, just tap
- 5:09like.
- 5:09>> Yes, a tiny tap to signal you are human
- 5:12and not a bot farm in a warehouse.
- 5:14>> I'm pretty sure the bots can click like
- 5:16now, Jonathan.
- 5:19>> [laughter]
- 5:20>> Okay, my bot army, hear my voice.
- 5:2401110100
- 5:27>> The bots understand English now. You
- 5:29don't need to talk in binary.
- 5:31>> Meep morp, ladies. 01100010
- 5:36>> Humans, save us. Like this video before
- 5:38it's too late.
- 5:39>> 011011000011
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of AI Expert Proposes Hard Rule to Separate "AI Slop" from Legitimate AI-Assisted Writing by Author Update, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 995 words across 160 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.