Abortion Debate on 'The Breakfast Club' Gets Heated — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00Then you believe in banning abortions,
- 0:01right?
- 0:01>> Uh I I'm pro life. Yes.
- 0:03>> Even in cases of incest and rape?
- 0:05>> Yes.
- 0:06>> Why?
- 0:06>> Uh because th this is a sort of a
- 0:08fundamental definitional question. If
- 0:10you believe life begins at conception,
- 0:12then regardless of the source of the
- 0:14life, it now has an independent interest
- 0:16in life. So that's that is not to
- 0:18minimize the the tremendous evil of rape
- 0:20or incest, I I believe rape should be
- 0:22should be executed frankly um or
- 0:24chemically castrated at best. But you
- 0:26know that that's sort of a different
- 0:28question from the independent source of
- 0:30life and whether whe this again it gets
- 0:32back to definitions and this this
- 0:35conversation tends to be either you're
- 0:36on one side of that or the other. If you
- 0:37if you don't believe life begins at
- 0:38conception then obviously you believe
- 0:40abortion is acceptable in a wide variety
- 0:41of circumstances. If you believe it's an
- 0:43independent life deserving of protection
- 0:45then you believe it's an independent
- 0:47life deserving of protection.
- 0:48>> Norm what do you think about that? I'm
- 0:49just as a woman.
- 0:50>> Um I think that a woman should be able
- 0:51to choose to do what she wants to do
- 0:53wherever she decides to do it. I
- 0:54personally I believe that women should
- 0:56be able to uh abort babies if they want
- 0:58to if they feel like that's what they
- 0:59need to do.
- 0:59>> Do do you have a time limit on that out
- 1:01of curiosity?
- 1:02>> Um I mean I think it should happen
- 1:05earlier on if it were me making a
- 1:07decision for myself, but I think it's up
- 1:09to the woman and what she's personally
- 1:10experiencing and what she personally
- 1:12went through. I really think it's a per
- 1:13person thing. And that's why I think
- 1:14it's crazy when you have like these
- 1:16structures and these like people who are
- 1:18not in that that uh that situation
- 1:20making the decision for the woman of
- 1:22what you can and can't do because it's
- 1:24very like per person. My situation might
- 1:26be different than another woman who's
- 1:27sitting next to me.
- 1:28>> Right. So again, this is sort of the
- 1:29definitional issue that we're talking
- 1:30about because you're talking about what
- 1:33a woman should be allowed to do and what
- 1:35I'm talking about is the definition of
- 1:36personhood of the separate person inside
- 1:38the woman. I think that what I what I'd
- 1:40push on is why why do you personally
- 1:41believe that a woman should have an
- 1:42abortion earlier?
- 1:44>> Um just I think just in from personal
- 1:46experience I've been in a situation. I
- 1:48just think emotionally and mentally it's
- 1:50less that you think about but it does
- 1:51depend on how you think of when the life
- 1:54is formed or or you know should be
- 1:56looked at as like a life that you
- 1:57>> right. So that's that that I think is
- 1:59the big question and that's where the
- 2:00disconnect is. So so
- 2:01>> but that what I'm saying is that that's
- 2:02always going to be different for each
- 2:04person. But I don't think that the
- 2:06subjective definition of life is how we
- 2:08define life. Meaning that you being
- 2:10uncomfortable with a woman having an
- 2:12abortion in the ninth month, you're
- 2:14saying that just because you're
- 2:15uncomfortable with it, that doesn't mean
- 2:16that you should stop a woman from doing
- 2:17that. My point is that life has a
- 2:20definition, right? We all agree, for
- 2:21example, that a onemonth old baby should
- 2:22not be drowned, right? We all agree on
- 2:24that. And that's not up to the the
- 2:25personal should not be drowned. You
- 2:26shouldn't you shouldn't take the baby
- 2:27and drown in a bathtub, right? And and
- 2:29the question is, well, why? Because we
- 2:32now understand that the one-month old
- 2:33baby, everyone agrees with this, right?
- 2:35That that except for Peter Singer at
- 2:36Princeton, that a one-month old baby has
- 2:38an independent interest in life, right?
- 2:40That is a life that is that is separate
- 2:41from the woman and requires protection.
- 2:44Okay? So, if it is a life, then we now
- 2:46have an objective definition. Doesn't
- 2:48matter what the state of mind of the
- 2:48woman is. It doesn't matter if she
- 2:50thought, you know what, I have a really
- 2:51tough life. My life will be better off
- 2:53if if this baby is drowned, if I don't
- 2:55have to deal with this baby, and so I'm
- 2:56gonna drown the baby. that the baby has
- 2:58an independent
- 3:00actual interest in living. And so the
- 3:02question becomes, is that true before
- 3:04birth? And I think for for the vast
- 3:06majority of Americans are actually
- 3:07somewhere where you are practically,
- 3:08meaning that the vast majority of
- 3:09Americans do see in sort of a soft way a
- 3:13distinction between, you know, the early
- 3:15stages of life, you know, month two and
- 3:179 month, right? Like the approval in
- 3:19America of abortion at the very late
- 3:20stages is very, very low because most
- 3:22Americans
- 3:22>> it stops around like four or five months
- 3:24for most people, right? I mean, mo most
- 3:26abortions are performed in the in the
- 3:28first trimester. Yes. Yes. But but the
- 3:30the point that I'm making is that the
- 3:32the logic that that you're using allows
- 3:34for abortion like literally right before
- 3:36the baby is born. So then the question
- 3:37becomes why is that okay? And it's not a
- 3:40woman's choice at that point whether
- 3:41that is a life or not because you don't
- 3:43get to artificially or subjectively
- 3:45define the meaning of things.
- 3:46>> We're playing with semantics though.
- 3:47Yeah. It's not it's not semantic. Either
- 3:49either it's a life or it's not a life.
- 3:50Right.
- 3:51>> Your daughter was raped. It's almost
- 3:52like you're saying she's raped and I'm
- 3:54going to make her have this child.
- 3:56>> No, I I mean
- 3:57>> because you're saying you don't believe
- 3:58in abortion, even if rape and incest,
- 3:59right?
- 3:59>> I I'm what what I'm saying there is that
- 4:01I don't believe in abortion in case of
- 4:03rape and incest. The practical effect is
- 4:05hor horrible. Okay, I'm not going to
- 4:07pretend that it is not emotionally
- 4:09horrifying that particular situation.
- 4:12>> The question is whether it has an
- 4:13independent interest in life or not and
- 4:14whether there's a third party involved.
- 4:16If you don't believe there's a third
- 4:17party deserving of protection, I totally
- 4:18get it. I get it. But we should we
- 4:20should understand that that's the actual
- 4:21conversation. And the actual
- 4:22conversation is about whether you
- 4:23believe that this is an interested third
- 4:26party being. Do you get to kill that
- 4:28interested third party being, this human
- 4:30life with potential, or do you not? If
- 4:32you and so the actual argument that that
- 4:34I I don't like is the idea that that you
- 4:37can that everybody it's up to every
- 4:38single person to define when life begins
- 4:40and when life does not begin. That that
- 4:41actually is not true, right? There's
- 4:42either a standard or there's not a Now,
- 4:44you can say that that life begins when
- 4:46the baby is independent of the mom. I
- 4:48think it's a very dicey biological
- 4:49argument and I think most Americans
- 4:51agree with that that that that life only
- 4:52begins when the baby exits.
- 4:54>> I think it begins with with a heartbeat.
- 4:55>> Yeah.
- 4:56>> Okay. So, I think that's where most
- 4:57Americans are and that's extremely
- 4:58early. Right. And so if that if that's
- 5:00extremely if the life begins with the
- 5:01heartbeat then you you're now talking
- 5:03about depending on your definition of a
- 5:05heartbeat somewhere between 6 and 10
- 5:06weeks,
- 5:06>> right? Very very very early. And so if
- 5:08that is now has an independent interest,
- 5:10you're talking about abortion
- 5:11restrictions very early on. And so
- 5:13that's why you know a lot of red states
- 5:15have signed heartbeat laws for example.
- 5:17Right. And so again, I think that the
- 5:20clarity is good, right? Because now we
- 5:22can have a conversation. Where do you
- 5:23think life begins? And that's a better
- 5:24conversation than the the sort of
- 5:27assumption by I think people who are not
- 5:28pro-life that pro-life is just about
- 5:30controlling the woman's body. No, it it
- 5:32isn't. Okay. It really is not. Like for
- 5:34proiffers, it has it has literally
- 5:36nothing to do with the woman's body. It
- 5:38has to do with the independent interest
- 5:39of the life inside the woman and how you
- 5:41define that. If you're a homeowner, you
- 5:43need to listen to this. In today's AI
- 5:44and cyber world, scammers are stealing
- 5:46home titles and your equity is the
- 5:48target. Here's how it works. Criminals
- 5:49forge your signature on one document.
- 5:51They use a fake notary stamp. They pay a
- 5:52small fee with your county. And just
- 5:54like that, your home title is now
- 5:55transferred out of your name. Then they
- 5:57take out loans using your equity or even
- 5:58sell your property, and you won't even
- 6:00know that it's happened until you get a
- 6:01collection or a foreclosure notice. So,
- 6:03when is the last time you actually
- 6:04checked on your home title? Well, if
- 6:06your answer is, like most people, never,
- 6:07you probably should do that right now.
- 6:09And that's why I've partnered with Home
- 6:10Title Lock so you can find out today if
- 6:12you're already a victim. A lot of people
- 6:13at the Daily Wire, including people on
- 6:15this team, trust Home Title Lock to
- 6:16protect what is likely one of their
- 6:18biggest assets. Again, much of your
- 6:21value, just as as a person with assets,
- 6:24is in the chief asset you own, which is
- 6:25your home. Why would you make that
- 6:26vulnerable? Use my promo code Shapiro at
- 6:28homelock.com. You'll get a free title
- 6:30history report and a free trial of their
- 6:32million-doll triple lock protection.
- 6:34That's 24/7 monitoring of your title,
- 6:36urgent alerts to any changes, and if
- 6:37fraud does happen, they'll spend up to 1
- 6:39million bucks to fix it. Don't be a
- 6:41victim. Protect your equity today. Go to
- 6:43hometitlelock.com. Use promo code
- 6:45Shapiro. That's homeitlock.com. Promo
- 6:47code Shapiro.
- 6:48>> But once you define it, once you define
- 6:50it, depending on your definition, it
- 6:51does control what a woman can and can't
- 6:53do with her body.
- 6:54>> Well, there effects to definitions of
- 6:55course, right? I mean, if I define life
- 6:57as it begins at a heartbeat, then that
- 6:59is going to have public policy
- 7:00ramifications that affect and just as in
- 7:03anything else, if I define theft in a
- 7:06particular way, that's going to have
- 7:07downstream effects on people who commit
- 7:09that definition of the crime. And if I
- 7:11broaden the definition, it's going to
- 7:12include more people. That's true for
- 7:14literally any legal term. It's true for
- 7:16for any word that we use in life. As you
- 7:18expand the definition, it affects more
- 7:19people in different ways. But that
- 7:21doesn't change the necessity to have the
- 7:22conversation about what the definition
- 7:24is. And I think it's an easy way out to
- 7:26basically say, well, you know, I have a
- 7:28definition of life, but and and it gets
- 7:30into very dicey territory because
- 7:31historically people have defined uh
- 7:33defined away entire populations as not
- 7:36human. And so we can't do that, right?
- 7:38like you you you really don't want
- 7:39people looking at other people and
- 7:41saying well by I you know I don't think
- 7:43that this person I I mean to to take the
- 7:46the obvious and most controversial
- 7:47example for a huge percentage of
- 7:49American history there was a wide
- 7:50variety of people in America who
- 7:52believed black people were not fully
- 7:53human and therefore you could enslave
- 7:55them compromise correct um and so like
- 7:58the and and so was that a subjective
- 8:00question that was not a subjective
- 8:01question black people are fully human
- 8:04and just as human as white people equal
- 8:06the same right like the And so if
- 8:08somebody were to say, "Listen, I
- 8:10personally am anti-slavery, right? I
- 8:11think that slavery is is personally
- 8:13wrong, but it's really up to every
- 8:15person to define for themsel whether a
- 8:17black person is fully a human or not
- 8:19fully a human." You're like, "What the
- 8:20what the
- 8:21>> I don't think you can compare those two
- 8:22things."
- 8:23>> Why?
- 8:24>> Just because I think, you know, if if
- 8:26I'm making So if you're a slave master,
- 8:29right, and you say, "I believe slavery
- 8:31is right because black people aren't
- 8:33human." Like that's a decision that
- 8:36you're making that is based on things
- 8:38like you know what the slaves can do for
- 8:39you and your property. Like the the what
- 8:41the benefit of what slavery will do for
- 8:43that slave master is so different than
- 8:45if a woman has to have a baby because
- 8:47she was raped and how that will affect
- 8:49her life like that. I think you have a
- 8:50decision that you can make a lot easier.
- 8:53>> It's almost like you force a woman
- 8:54twice, right? Cuz she like do I become a
- 8:55slave master or not versus do I have a
- 8:57baby or she has this baby and now she's
- 8:59forced to have
- 8:59>> try a Jewish analogy. Go.
- 9:01>> Sure. So I mean I mean sure. So if there
- 9:03was an entire population in Europe that
- 9:06was considered subhuman by the Nazis and
- 9:08they were exterminated. If you said I am
- 9:10personally against the extermination of
- 9:11the Jews, but I understand why Germans
- 9:13could think that Jews are subhuman.
- 9:14>> And so you know it really is up to every
- 9:17individual to determine whether a Jew is
- 9:20human or not fully human and can be put
- 9:21in the back of a van and gast. We'd be
- 9:23like what are what in the world? What in
- 9:26the world?
- 9:26>> You're saying there should be no
- 9:27prochoice in regards to that.
- 9:29>> Yeah. So the definitions are not a
- 9:30matter of choice. definitions are a
- 9:32matter of actual objective fact
- 9:33otherwise we can't even have a
- 9:34conversation because if words have
- 9:36meanings then we all have to agree on
- 9:38the at least that right that much we
- 9:40have to agree on is is the meaning of
- 9:41the words and when it comes to you know
- 9:43sort of the slavemaster analogy the the
- 9:44point that I'm making here is is not
- 9:46about the personal experience of the
- 9:48slave master in fact I'm saying it's
- 9:49completely irrelevant what I'm saying is
- 9:51that the reason that that slavery was
- 9:52wrong is because black people are fully
- 9:54independent human beings who require the
- 9:56protection of the law in the same way as
- 9:58everyone else and if you're a proifer
- 10:00you believe that's also true unborn.
- 10:01>> Okay. I like I understand what you're
- 10:02saying. Um I'm a pro-choice person. Uh
- 10:05but I do wonder how come pro-life people
- 10:07aren't anti-war.
- 10:09>> Well, I mean I think everybody is
- 10:11anti-war. I think the question is is the
- 10:13definition of when war is appropriate? I
- 10:15don't like who's running around going
- 10:17like war is awesome. Yes, more war.
- 10:20Let's do it.
- 10:20>> So 50,000 kids have been killed in Gaza
- 10:23because of this current war.
- 10:24>> Depends on on the definitions and the
- 10:26list that you're getting. Well, I mean,
- 10:27also depends on on how you're defining
- 10:29kid because the way that kamas defines
- 10:30kid is very different than how they
- 10:32define kid when it comes to recruiting
- 10:33for kamas, right? There are 15-year-olds
- 10:35with with AKs on the battlefield,
- 10:36unfortunately.
- 10:37>> Out of the womb,
- 10:39>> is it is not 50,000 out of the womb. I
- 10:41mean, if you're talking if you're
- 10:41talking about like very very small
- 10:42children is much much lower than that.
- 10:44>> But my point is there are children that
- 10:46are being killed.
- 10:47>> Yes. Who who have died as collateral
- 10:48damage in the war. Yes.
- 10:49>> So, shouldn't proifers be totally
- 10:51against that?
- 10:51>> Well, I mean, I'm I'm against the death
- 10:53of any innocent human being. The
- 10:55question is when you're doing foreign
- 10:56policy, how you prevent more deaths in
- 10:59the future and and the point that that I
- 11:01think Israel is making is this war it
- 11:03off legislation and it's actually not a
- 11:04matter of morals and values or
- 11:06>> no of course of course it's a matter of
- 11:07morals and values but you can't be let's
- 11:10put it this way. It is it's incredibly
- 11:11reductive to simply say that if you are
- 11:14a moral person then you oppose all war
- 11:16because what that does it allows immoral
- 11:18people to then use that against you to
- 11:19destroy your civilization. If if your
- 11:21community is attacked and bad people who
- 11:23don't have the same values as you decide
- 11:24to kill you, kill your children, rape
- 11:26your wife and kill her, are you supposed
- 11:29to say, "Well, I'm anti-war and so I'm
- 11:30going to sit here and do nothing."
- 11:31>> So, isn't that the same if somebody
- 11:33rapes a woman and impregnates them?
- 11:35Shouldn't in that case that person be
- 11:37allowed to make a choice?
- 11:38>> Well, no. The the point is that the the
- 11:40prevention this is why you should
- 11:41minimize civilian casualties. To get
- 11:43back to the beginning of the of the
- 11:44conversation, this is why it's it's
- 11:45independently moral to try as much as
- 11:47possible to minimize civilian
- 11:48casualties. Right? When it comes to
- 11:50abortion, the idea is you can minimize
- 11:51that casualty by just preventing it.
- 11:54>> How can you prevent being raped?
- 11:56>> Well, I mean that that's a different
- 11:57question again.
- 11:58>> But in that, let's let's talk about that
- 12:00because what I don't like is Listen,
- 12:02first first of all, when we're talking
- 12:04about when we're talking about rape and
- 12:06abortion, we should note that well over
- 12:0899% of abortions are are not undertaken
- 12:11because of rape. And so, if you want to
- 12:13come with me and ban all abortions
- 12:14except for rape, I'll probably make that
- 12:15trade for you. Meaning if you want to
- 12:17ban all abortions, elective abortions,
- 12:19and what I have to do is give up
- 12:21abortion with regard to rape and incest,
- 12:23that is that is a trade on a pragmatic
- 12:25level politically that I would make.
- 12:27>> Okay. So, you're not down on that hill.
- 12:29You
- 12:29>> Well, it's not it's not that I I mean, I
- 12:30I believe that again, rape and incest, I
- 12:33think, is is the reason people choose
- 12:34that argument is because it's the
- 12:35hardest argument to make emotionally
- 12:36from the pro-life side. But I think that
- 12:38we should note that the vast majority of
- 12:39abortions have nothing to do with rape
- 12:41or incest. They have to do with elective
- 12:42abortions.
- 12:43>> Was that
- 12:43>> you never got the wrong person pregnant?
- 12:44>> Jesus.
- 12:45>> Uh, no. my my wife four times. Thank
- 12:46God.
- 12:47>> Oh, okay.
- 12:48>> Well, that's all for now, folks. Don't
- 12:49forget to like, subscribe, and comment
- 12:51your thoughts down below. Be sure to
- 12:53check out all of the other great content
- 12:54on my channel. I'll see you here next
- 12:56time.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of Abortion Debate on 'The Breakfast Club' Gets Heated by Ben Shapiro, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 3,187 words across 469 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.