A Rape That Wasn't: The Wrongful Conviction of Jarrett Adams — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00My name is Jared Maurice Adams. I'm from
- 0:02the south side of Chicago. In 1998, when
- 0:05I was 17 years old, I was falsely
- 0:08accused and ultimately wrongfully
- 0:10convicted of a sexual assault that I did
- 0:12not commit. I spent almost 8 years in
- 0:14prison before I was exonerated with the
- 0:17help of the Wisconsin Innocent Project.
- 0:25The case against Jared Adams as
- 0:27presented to the jury as as the case was
- 0:29tried was a was a really thin case.
- 0:32Really, most of the evidence, virtually
- 0:35all of the evidence of what happened
- 0:37both before and after uh the sexual
- 0:40encounter was entirely consistent with
- 0:42this consensual encounter and really
- 0:45inconsistent with the non-consensual
- 0:47encounter. And it really it really
- 0:48looked very much like what I think is
- 0:50the reality here, which is that this
- 0:52young woman um spent an evening of
- 0:55drinking and engaged in in consensual
- 0:57sex that she later regretted and as we
- 0:59have seen in other occasions um
- 1:03decided to turn it into a claim of
- 1:04sexual assault. My family and I had
- 1:07absolutely no knowledge of the law. I
- 1:09had never been in trouble before and
- 1:11never really had any experience or no
- 1:13one close to me had an experience with
- 1:15the law at this level. So, we trusted my
- 1:18courtappointed attorney that the
- 1:20evidence against me was so weak and so
- 1:22thin that, you know, he would come up
- 1:25with a strategy called a no defense
- 1:27strategy. The thing with this theory
- 1:29that my lawyer chose was this no defense
- 1:31strategy kept me from calling the one
- 1:34witness that would have proved my
- 1:35innocence. I guess my lawyer lost sight
- 1:38of the fact that this case had very
- 1:40little to do with the false accusation
- 1:42of the sexual assault. It had more to do
- 1:44with the issue of race. In many ways,
- 1:46this case was sort of the classic uh
- 1:49racially tinged story of a a young white
- 1:53woman who claims to have been sexually
- 1:56assaulted by oversexed black men. Um,
- 2:00and it's one that is very very difficult
- 2:02when cast in those terms, very difficult
- 2:04for the jury uh in this white community
- 2:07in in southern Wisconsin to to look at
- 2:10this uh victim who's claiming these
- 2:13black men have attacked her and
- 2:14assaulted her. Very difficult for them
- 2:16to disregard her testimony or to say
- 2:18they don't believe her uh and to instead
- 2:20accept the defendant's claim of consent.
- 2:23My trial lasted two days and I have to
- 2:25say that it was like an out-of- body
- 2:27experience for me. I really didn't know
- 2:29what was going on. I didn't know any of
- 2:31the legal language that was being spoke.
- 2:34I was ultimately convicted and once I
- 2:36was convicted, I went on to go to
- 2:38sentencing about a week later. When I
- 2:40was sentenced, the judge originally gave
- 2:42me 20 years, but I was given an
- 2:45additional 8 years because when I got up
- 2:47to speak, I addressed the court and I
- 2:49told them that I was innocent and did
- 2:50not commit the sexual assault.
- 3:00In prison, I survived only by the grace
- 3:02of God and my will to fight. I took it
- 3:05personal because I knew I did not commit
- 3:07this sexual assault. So, I wanted to
- 3:09prove my innocence. It was so many
- 3:12things in prison that can get you
- 3:14sidetracked and get you in trouble, even
- 3:16get you killed. So, what I did was I
- 3:18focused on my case. Every day I would go
- 3:20down to the law library and I would read
- 3:22books and I would try to understand what
- 3:25was going on in the courtroom that I
- 3:27didn't understand when I was 17 years
- 3:29old. At this time I started to
- 3:31understand the law a little bit. So I
- 3:33started to write letters. I wrote
- 3:35letters every week to different
- 3:37organizations. Ultimately one day I
- 3:39wrote the Wisconsin Innocent Project and
- 3:42they took my case. So Jared's basic
- 3:44claim in this case uh was primarily one
- 3:46of ineffective assistance of counsel.
- 3:48And essentially what that means is it's
- 3:50a it's a claim that his lawyer did not
- 3:53perform adequately up to the
- 3:55requirements imposed by the sixth
- 3:56amendment of the constitution. That's
- 3:58the uh the right to counsel provision in
- 4:00the constitution. What was so important
- 4:03that was missing in this case the
- 4:04defense council didn't present was the
- 4:06testimony of a third party, a neutral
- 4:09witness who was friend to neither the
- 4:11defendant nor the complaining witness
- 4:13and who um who had seen in events prior
- 4:17to and immediately after the alleged
- 4:19sexual assault and could in very
- 4:21powerful terms corroborate Jared Adams
- 4:23claim uh of of how things went down and
- 4:26significantly undermine the credibility
- 4:28of the of the complaining witness's u uh
- 4:31testimony.
- 4:32Um, and I suppose the common
- 4:34understanding is probably that if your
- 4:37lawyer screws up, if your lawyer doesn't
- 4:38do a good job, you get a new trial. Uh,
- 4:41the reality is not quite that simple and
- 4:43it's not quite that easy. And that's
- 4:45largely because the courts have
- 4:47established a fairly ownorous standard
- 4:50um that one has to meet in order to be
- 4:52granted a new trial based on a claim of
- 4:54ineffective assistance of counsel. Um,
- 4:57as the courts like to say, the Sixth
- 4:58Amendment provides a right to an
- 5:00adequate defense attorney or an adequate
- 5:03trial, not a particularly good or
- 5:05perfect defense lawyer or trial. Because
- 5:08that standard is so high, uh, so
- 5:10difficult to meet, the vast majority of
- 5:13claims of ineffective assistance of
- 5:14counsel are routinely denied. Uh, so
- 5:17this looked like a very high mountain
- 5:19that we were going to have to scale to
- 5:21to obtain relief for Jared. Legally, I
- 5:24knew that I had a very slim chance of
- 5:27getting my case in the court and getting
- 5:28it thrown out and getting my conviction
- 5:30overturned. But I couldn't think like
- 5:32that. In order for me to survive in
- 5:34prison, I had to live each day like I
- 5:37was going home the next. And I have to
- 5:39tell you, I was um I was always
- 5:41impressed with Jared that here he was,
- 5:44this young man hadn't gone to college,
- 5:46hadn't certainly had no legal training,
- 5:48and he understood the law. He understood
- 5:51it really well. um he understood it
- 5:53better than a lot of lawyers out there
- 5:55and in fact he was advising us about
- 5:58this claim ought to be included. Look at
- 5:59these cases. I was convinced that I
- 6:01would win my case but I continued to get
- 6:04different results from the court after
- 6:06appeal after appeal after appeal was
- 6:08denied and finally my case was heard in
- 6:10the seventh circuit and that's where I
- 6:11won. This case made a really significant
- 6:13statement in part because we won relief
- 6:16in the United States Court of Appeals
- 6:18for the Seventh Circuit. That's the
- 6:19federal appellet court for the region
- 6:22that covers Wisconsin, Illinois, and
- 6:24Indiana. This is this is a court that's
- 6:27known as a tough court. It's a fairly
- 6:29conservative court. It's hard to win
- 6:31criminal uh cases in this court. And it
- 6:34was a real long shot to get any kind of
- 6:36relief from the Seventh Circuit. But not
- 6:39only did the court reverse Jared Adams
- 6:40conviction, it did so unanimously. It
- 6:43concluded that in fact the state court
- 6:45decisions were not only wrong, but
- 6:47unreasonably wrong. And in the course of
- 6:49so doing, the the court uh expressed in
- 6:52in no uncertain terms their its
- 6:55conclusion that the evidence against
- 6:57Jared Adams at trial had been very very
- 6:59thin evidence indeed and that this
- 7:02therefore this new witness who would
- 7:04have corroborated Jared's claims and
- 7:06undermined the complaining witness's
- 7:08allegations. uh it did indeed uh
- 7:11undermine their confidence in the
- 7:12outcome of the case and lead them to
- 7:14conclude very firmly that a different
- 7:16outcome was was quite quite likely upon
- 7:19a retrial.
- 7:23My wrongful conviction is just part of
- 7:25the story. The real story is what I'm
- 7:27doing now with my life. I was released
- 7:30in February of 2007. In May of 2007, I
- 7:34enrolled in South Suburban College. And
- 7:36in the spring of 2010, I'll be
- 7:38graduating with honors with my
- 7:40associates in liberal arts. I'm now
- 7:42applying to four-year universities, and
- 7:44I'm happy to say that I'm be the first
- 7:46male to walk across the stage in my
- 7:48family. After I obtain my bachelor's
- 7:50degree, my next step will be law school,
- 7:52so that way I can fulfill my dream of
- 7:54becoming a lawyer. You know, every
- 7:56exoneration is unique. Everyone is
- 7:58powerful. Uh this one is is really
- 8:00special in in in its own way. um
- 8:04everything ranging from the fact that
- 8:06when we first took it, it was one that I
- 8:07had really very little hope that we
- 8:09would succeed on it and then to see
- 8:11Jared get out of prison. Uh ultimately
- 8:13the state dismissed all the charges as
- 8:15was was appropriate, the only thing they
- 8:17really could and should have done. And
- 8:18then to see him get out, go back to
- 8:20school, um do really well in school, set
- 8:24his sights on going to a a first class
- 8:27university and ultimately becoming a
- 8:29lawyer. He will be a fine lawyer. He
- 8:31will be a really fine lawyer. You know,
- 8:33people often ask me, you know, are you
- 8:34upset? Are you mad? Are you angry? Yeah.
- 8:37Yeah, I'm mad. I'm angry. Yes. But this
- 8:39is my fuel. This is the fuel that drives
- 8:42me to become a lawyer, to open up as
- 8:44many eyes as I can. And to be able to
- 8:47defend against the same thing that
- 8:50ultimately got me convicted, not having
- 8:52a defense.
- 8:56[Music]
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of A Rape That Wasn't: The Wrongful Conviction of Jarrett Adams by John Maki, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 1,621 words across 232 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.