A Cosmologist’s Guide to the End of the Universe | Katie Mack and Debbie Millman | TED — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:03Katie.
- 0:04>> Yes.
- 0:05>> Hi.
- 0:05>> Hi.
- 0:06>> I understand that you earned your
- 0:09private pilot license during the
- 0:12pandemic
- 0:13>> Yes.
- 0:14>> and are now doing aerobatic training.
- 0:17I've heard of acrobatic training, but
- 0:19never aerobatic training.
- 0:21>> Mhm.
- 0:21>> Tell us what that is.
- 0:23>> Yeah, so aerobatics is flying the
- 0:26airplane in unusual ways. So, things
- 0:29like loops and uh spins and rolls and
- 0:33really learning how to control the
- 0:35airplane at all areas of the envelope.
- 0:39You know, really beyond the normal
- 0:41straight and level flying. And it's
- 0:43super fun because it's like creating
- 0:45your own roller coaster in the sky.
- 0:47>> And it's not scary?
- 0:49>> It's It can be scary sometimes.
- 0:51>> a daredevil.
- 0:52>> No, I I enjoy it because it's it's
- 0:56challenging, it's interesting, it's a
- 0:58different perspective, and it's a way to
- 1:01learn enough about how the plane behaves
- 1:03to be safer when you're trying to just
- 1:06fly straight and level. Sometimes things
- 1:08happen and you need to learn how to
- 1:09recover. So, I do it because it's a
- 1:12challenge, because I enjoy it. I'm not
- 1:13an adrenaline junkie in any way. Um but
- 1:16uh it's it's just something that I feel
- 1:19like it it can make you a better pilot
- 1:21and it's just a a different way of
- 1:23seeing the world.
- 1:25>> Has flying given you a different
- 1:26perspective on your work as a
- 1:28cosmologist?
- 1:30>> I think what it has done is it's allowed
- 1:33me to have a space where I don't think
- 1:36about work, actually. It's um when you
- 1:39are fully fully in absorbed in something
- 1:42and fully focused, it's you you get into
- 1:45this zone where nothing else can touch
- 1:47you. And when you're flying, you have to
- 1:49be focused. You can't think about other
- 1:51things because things will go very badly
- 1:54if you if you take your focus away from
- 1:56what you're doing. And so, I really
- 1:58enjoy that that opportunity to
- 2:01just be in the moment, be in the plane,
- 2:05have that different view of the world,
- 2:07um and and I enjoy, you know, the extra
- 2:10challenge of of trying to do something
- 2:12else.
- 2:13>> Your grandfather worked on the Apollo 11
- 2:16mission.
- 2:17>> Yes.
- 2:17>> And I believed he saved the lives of the
- 2:20Apollo 11 astronauts. Can you share some
- 2:23of that story with us?
- 2:24>> Yes. So, my grandfather was a
- 2:26meteorologist in the Navy and um he
- 2:30worked on things like um
- 2:32creating uh satellite views of the
- 2:34weather with these new rockets that
- 2:37they'd just developed. And he was asked
- 2:39to help with the Apollo 11 mission, and
- 2:41his job was to figure out if the weather
- 2:44conditions at the splashdown site, when
- 2:46the capsule came back, were going to be
- 2:48okay, right? Because you you don't want
- 2:50to come into a storm when you're when
- 2:52the capsule's coming in on the
- 2:53parachutes.
- 2:54And he was, you know, checking all the
- 2:56usual charts, and it looked fine, but he
- 2:58knew there was a a secret satellite that
- 3:01was a weather satellite, but it was a
- 3:02secret because it could also be used for
- 3:04spying, and he had been in the Navy. Um
- 3:06and he wanted to make sure that there
- 3:08was nothing in the splashdown area that
- 3:11was going to be a problem. So, he went
- 3:12over to his connections through the Navy
- 3:15and checked on that satellite, and it
- 3:17turned out that the splashdown zone that
- 3:19they'd designated had a a storm coming,
- 3:22something called screaming eagle
- 3:24thunderclouds. Something really bad
- 3:26>> That doesn't sound good.
- 3:28>> no. And apparently, it was it was bad
- 3:31enough that it could have just ripped
- 3:32the parachutes right off the capsule as
- 3:34it was coming in. And so, he managed to
- 3:36convince NASA to move the splashdown
- 3:39site just 72 hours before the
- 3:41splashdown, and he couldn't tell them
- 3:43why because NASA's a civilian agency,
- 3:45they couldn't know about these secret
- 3:48satellites. And so, he had to just use
- 3:51the weight of his expertise and his
- 3:53reputation to tell them, "You have to
- 3:55move the splashdown. I cannot tell you
- 3:57why. Here's an alternative." And so,
- 3:59they moved it a few hundred kilometers
- 4:02uh in some direction, and it was fine.
- 4:04But,
- 4:05>> So, basically, it was a trust me, I've
- 4:06got this.
- 4:07>> Yeah, but they did say, "We are also
- 4:09going to send some planes to the
- 4:10original site, and if it's fine there,
- 4:12you're in trouble."
- 4:14They did send the planes. There was
- 4:16There there was a storm,
- 4:17um but the astronauts were were fine.
- 4:21>> You said you were a curious child drawn
- 4:24to the night sky before you even knew
- 4:26the word cosmology.
- 4:28Were you influenced by your
- 4:29grandfather's work?
- 4:30>> I was definitely influenced by him as a
- 4:33scientist. So, I knew him
- 4:35I didn't know him through his Apollo 11
- 4:38work, because that was actually
- 4:39classified until I was sort of an
- 4:41adolescent, but I knew him through
- 4:44just his expertise about the weather. Um
- 4:47I knew him through He was a volunteer at
- 4:49the Monterey Bay Aquarium. Uh so, he
- 4:52knew everything about the sea animals,
- 4:54and I I just loved to see him talk about
- 4:56the things he was excited about. And And
- 4:58he had gone to Caltech as a as a student
- 5:01to learn about meteorology. And so, I I
- 5:03I knew a little bit about Caltech and
- 5:05about the, you know, all the nerdy
- 5:06people there doing fun, exciting
- 5:08science. And so, he was definitely an
- 5:10influence in getting me excited about
- 5:12science.
- 5:13>> Katie, you've written about how you were
- 5:15just 10 years old 10 years old when you
- 5:19read Stephen Hawking's book A Brief
- 5:21History of Time.
- 5:22>> Mhm.
- 5:23>> I had to read that book really, really
- 5:26slowly to grasp what he was writing, and
- 5:29I did that when I was 30.
- 5:30>> Yeah. Yeah.
- 5:32>> how did you first hear about the book
- 5:34when you were 10 years old? And what
- 5:36What provoked you to pick it up and
- 5:37start reading it?
- 5:38>> I think that I
- 5:40you know, I had exposure to a lot of
- 5:43different kinds of science through just
- 5:45my my family. I think my family picked
- 5:47up on the fact that I was curious. I was
- 5:49always a tinkerer. I was taking things
- 5:51apart and putting them back together,
- 5:52you know, sometimes correctly. And I I
- 5:54they knew that I was trying to
- 5:56understand everything. And so I had
- 5:58subscriptions to children's magazines
- 6:00about science and stuff like that. And
- 6:03um my my mom is a big science fiction um
- 6:06fan. And so I was reading her science
- 6:08fiction stuff. And every once in a while
- 6:10there would be like a public talk about
- 6:12science somewhere in our area. We lived
- 6:14in the LA area. And so she'd take me to
- 6:16talks by scientists. And so I think I
- 6:18just kind of accumulated um some of
- 6:21those books. And and uh when I read
- 6:24Hawking's book, I didn't understand very
- 6:25much of it as a 10-year-old, but I knew
- 6:28>> you reading it then?
- 6:29>> I just wanted to know. I just really I
- 6:31really wanted to try to understand this
- 6:33stuff. And I thought, you know, if I
- 6:34keep studying, I'll I'll I'll get this.
- 6:37And I'll I'll maybe be able to work in
- 6:39this area. I didn't know before I read
- 6:40that book that you could be a
- 6:42cosmologist, you know. I saw that
- 6:43Stephen Hawking is called a cosmologist.
- 6:45I was like, you know, what is that? What
- 6:47is that work? And I thought, well,
- 6:49that's what I want to do. I want to
- 6:50study the universe. I want to study the
- 6:52Big Bang and black holes and and
- 6:54space-time. I thought that sounded
- 6:56really cool.
- 6:57>> You attended Caltech for your undergrad
- 6:59education and graduated with a degree in
- 7:01physics. And you said that theoretical
- 7:03physics is not just a discipline of a of
- 7:07equations,
- 7:08>> Mhm.
- 7:08>> but of imagination.
- 7:10>> Yeah. Yeah.
- 7:10>> Um how so?
- 7:11>> You know, theoretical physics in general
- 7:14is the attempt to create kind of a
- 7:16mathematical cartoon of the world. So,
- 7:19you know, we have certain observations,
- 7:21we get data, and we try to find a a way
- 7:25to connect that data to whatever the
- 7:27input was. And and so we build sort of
- 7:30mathematical machine as a way to figure
- 7:32out how that all fits together. And you
- 7:34have to be creative. You have to, you
- 7:36know, think about like, what are the
- 7:38possibilities here? What are the things,
- 7:40you know, what kinds of symmetries can I
- 7:42find in this system, you know, how do
- 7:44how are the these things similar to
- 7:45these other things? So, it's very
- 7:47creative, it's very interactive, you
- 7:48know, there's the theoretical physics
- 7:50community is extremely collaborative,
- 7:52you know, everybody's gathered around
- 7:54chalkboards arguing about equations and,
- 7:57you know, going to conferences all the
- 7:58time giving talks, you know, we don't we
- 8:00don't sit in isolation, you know, just
- 8:03writing down equations by ourselves.
- 8:04It's it's always a conversation and it's
- 8:07always it's it's it's very much a
- 8:09creative, imaginative kind of work.
- 8:12>> You went on to Princeton University for
- 8:14your PhD, where your doctoral research
- 8:17focused on early universe cosmology,
- 8:21cosmic inflation, and dark matter. And
- 8:24you've written about how much of
- 8:26cosmology is trying to tell a story from
- 8:30the faintest traces of light.
- 8:32>> Mhm.
- 8:33>> Katie, how are you able to decipher
- 8:35those earliest traces? And what are some
- 8:39of the most important things you've
- 8:40learned about that light?
- 8:42>> Yeah, so, um, I think in that in that I
- 8:45must have been talking about the cosmic
- 8:46microwave background, which is light
- 8:48that's all around us in the universe.
- 8:50Um, if you if you tune a a microwave
- 8:53receiver, so, microwaves are just a kind
- 8:55of light, a kind of electromagnetic
- 8:57radiation. Um, and if you tune your
- 8:59receiver to the right frequencies, you
- 9:01can see this background of just a glow
- 9:04all around you everywhere in space. And,
- 9:07um, that's the light from the Big Bang.
- 9:10And and the way that we know that what
- 9:11that is is that we can look at the
- 9:13spectrum of that light, how much energy
- 9:14is at different frequencies, and we can
- 9:16see that the spectrum is exactly the
- 9:19same spectrum you get when something is
- 9:21glowing because it's hot. Like, if you
- 9:22take a poker and you stick it in the
- 9:24fire, it glows red, and that has a
- 9:26certain spectrum, a certain distribution
- 9:28of light. And it's just anything you
- 9:31heat up that glows, it glows because
- 9:33it's hot, it's because of the way the
- 9:35particles are moving around and creating
- 9:37light. And this background light has
- 9:39exactly the same spectrum and is
- 9:40everywhere in space. And so what it is
- 9:42is is if you look far enough away in any
- 9:44direction, you're looking so far away
- 9:47that the light has taken a really long
- 9:48time to get to you. Um you know, light
- 9:50takes some time to travel. So, you know,
- 9:52even in this room, you know, you're
- 9:54maybe 6 ft away from me. It takes about
- 9:566 nanoseconds for the light to get from
- 9:58you to me. So, you're you're 6
- 10:00nanoseconds in the past to me.
- 10:01>> And you are to me.
- 10:02>> And you and I am to you. But if I look
- 10:04far enough out in the cosmos, I can look
- 10:06billions of years in the past and I'm
- 10:08seeing directly that the past. And if
- 10:11you look so far away that you're looking
- 10:1313.8 billion years ago, you're looking
- 10:16at the time when the whole universe was
- 10:18glowing with heat because it was in this
- 10:20this hot dense phase of the very early
- 10:22universe. And so you see that glow very
- 10:25directly in the cosmic microwave
- 10:27background. And that's that's something
- 10:29that we can study. We can study that
- 10:31glow because we are looking directly at
- 10:33the very very early universe. It's
- 10:34incredible.
- 10:36>> Given that light travels, the light that
- 10:39is being picked up in this background,
- 10:43where is that going?
- 10:44>> It's it's just it's just diffusing
- 10:46through space. So, it's going in every
- 10:48direction.
- 10:48>> So, it's just continually moving.
- 10:50>> Yeah. Yeah. So, if you turn on a light
- 10:52bulb, the light moves out in every
- 10:54direction and you know, the light from
- 10:57the the the time the whole universe was
- 10:59glowing with heat, you know, that light
- 11:01was just moving in every direction.
- 11:03Eventually, the universe cooled down and
- 11:05light, you know, kept traveling in every
- 11:06direction and the places we see it at
- 11:09the sort of edges of our vision in the
- 11:11universe, that light is also going away
- 11:13from us. But the part that's going
- 11:14toward us, we see and we see that that
- 11:16background radiation.
- 11:18>> Voyager is not even one full light day
- 11:23away from Earth.
- 11:25But it's going to be another 40,000
- 11:28years before it encounters another
- 11:31celestial body.
- 11:33>> Yeah.
- 11:34>> Cosmology often deals with scales that
- 11:37defy comprehension. How do you hold on
- 11:41to the human scale with this sort of
- 11:44infinite, what seems like it's infinite?
- 11:47>> I mean, I can't conceptualize these
- 11:49scales really any more than anyone else
- 11:52can, you know, what we we talk about,
- 11:54you know, billions of light years and
- 11:57and all this stuff and and I I just have
- 12:00to write down the number and trust it. I
- 12:01don't I don't have a sense, you know, I
- 12:03can't hold in my head this this notion
- 12:05of, you know, that much space or that
- 12:07much time. Um so for me, you know,
- 12:11there's there's a kind of
- 12:14you know, sort of a a ruler in my mind
- 12:16of, you know, million, billion, trillion
- 12:19and I don't have a sense for how far
- 12:20apart those are. I just know that these
- 12:22are the scales that I'm working with and
- 12:24then I I think about on the human scale,
- 12:27you know, what what I can do as a as a
- 12:29scientist to try to understand it, but
- 12:31um you know, my work on my in my work
- 12:34even even individual galaxies are are
- 12:36not that important.
- 12:37>> [laughter]
- 12:39>> Let alone us.
- 12:41>> Yeah, I mean, professionally I I you
- 12:44know, all the human stuff is kind of
- 12:46lost in the weeds. Um but but the the
- 12:49work itself is is very human because
- 12:51we're all working together and we're all
- 12:53having this continual conversation and
- 12:55the mathematical models we're building
- 12:57are very much tied to our humanity
- 12:58because these are, you know, just things
- 13:02that come out of our our imaginations
- 13:03that are tested with the data and we are
- 13:06constantly making choices and
- 13:07constantly, you know, trying to better
- 13:09understand the universe we live in.
- 13:12>> What provoked you to choose a field that
- 13:17is primarily about how we end?
- 13:21>> [laughter]
- 13:22>> Um so
- 13:24I'm really interested in the whole story
- 13:26of the universe. So I've done a lot of
- 13:28work about the beginning of the universe
- 13:30and I've worked on how the universe
- 13:32evolves over time, how the first stars
- 13:34formed, how the dark matter, this
- 13:36invisible stuff that holds galaxies
- 13:37together, how that's evolved over time
- 13:39and brought galaxies into existence. And
- 13:43at some point I started getting really
- 13:44curious about the end as well and
- 13:46I just, you know, we know the universe
- 13:48is evolving and changing and we know
- 13:50that it's not going to be the same
- 13:51forever. It's going to be different and
- 13:53it's it's
- 13:55we we know that there was it was
- 13:57different in the beginning and it's
- 13:58changing and it's going to be real
- 13:59different in the future. And so, I'm
- 14:01really curious what that ending looks
- 14:03like and so that's why I wrote a book
- 14:05about the end of the universe just cuz
- 14:06I'm I wanted to talk about, you know,
- 14:09what are the possibilities? What are we
- 14:11thinking about how the universe will end
- 14:13and like what is that whole story, you
- 14:15know? I When you read a story, you want
- 14:17to know the beginning, the middle, and
- 14:19the end and and you know, I feel like
- 14:22it's it's really part of how we fit into
- 14:24this cosmos.
- 14:26>> Your book is titled The End of
- 14:27Everything and in it you explore five
- 14:31possible endings for the cosmos. The Big
- 14:34Crunch, Heat Death, The Big Rip, Vacuum
- 14:37Decay, and Bounce. Were there others
- 14:40that you left out or is this the only
- 14:42five options?
- 14:44>> Um [laughter]
- 14:46So, I focus on sort of five categories
- 14:48of endings that are things that are
- 14:51actually talked about in the physics
- 14:53literature. So, all of these are
- 14:54possibilities that physicists have put
- 14:56together models, we've
- 14:59you know, worked out what what the
- 15:01physics would be in each of these
- 15:02scenarios.
- 15:04There are there are ways to to tweak
- 15:07each of these where they're going to be
- 15:08a little bit different, but basically,
- 15:11you know, in terms of the whole cosmos,
- 15:13there there are only a finite number of
- 15:15ways that it can be destroyed,
- 15:17>> [laughter]
- 15:18>> like it can it can collapse, it can keep
- 15:19going,
- 15:21you can have these weird transitions
- 15:22where there's basically a bubble of
- 15:25of a new kind of space that spreads
- 15:26through the universe and destroys
- 15:27everything. And then there's like cyclic
- 15:29models and that's
- 15:31and there are a lot of different ways
- 15:32where the universe can end and start
- 15:34again or or the beginning of our
- 15:35universe could be the end of a previous
- 15:37universe and there are are a few of
- 15:39those that I talk about in the book as
- 15:40well.
- 15:41>> that that to me feels the most hopeful.
- 15:44Um
- 15:45>> [laughter]
- 15:46>> You've said that writing this book
- 15:48changed your relationship to time.
- 15:52>> Yeah.
- 15:52>> In what way?
- 15:54>> You know, talking about the very very
- 15:56distant future of the universe, you you
- 15:58really think about this kind of deep
- 16:00time idea and and how
- 16:03you know, the the bit of time we live in
- 16:06is so small. Um and the the bit of time
- 16:09humanity has existed in is so small and
- 16:11and there's there was time before us and
- 16:13there's going to be so much time after
- 16:15us.
- 16:16Um and it made me think a lot about not
- 16:18just time but like
- 16:20how our impact on the world, you know,
- 16:23we we are really unimportant in the
- 16:25universe. Just to say [laughter] like
- 16:27like uh humanity is is completely
- 16:31insignificant in the cosmos in every
- 16:32possible way you can imagine. Um
- 16:34but uh
- 16:35>> Optimistic morning, folks.
- 16:37>> I mean, but you know, I mean,
- 16:39we are it's impressive that we know so
- 16:41much but even though we are so
- 16:42insignificant. Um
- 16:44but uh you know, it made me think about
- 16:45like
- 16:47you know, everything is is going to end
- 16:49at some point and there's not going to
- 16:51be some you know, final thing that makes
- 16:53it all worthwhile, right? At some point
- 16:56everything will be destroyed. It kind of
- 16:57won't have mattered that we were here.
- 16:59Um so when we have think about how to
- 17:01find meaning and purpose, it's
- 17:04you know, it has to be something that's
- 17:06self-contained, you know, something that
- 17:08exists in the universe now. And what is
- 17:11you know, how do we find meaning in the
- 17:12moment? How do we find meaning that
- 17:13doesn't depend on it all being wrapped
- 17:16up with a tidy bow, you know, at some
- 17:18future point. Um and that that really
- 17:20made me think differently about what's
- 17:22important in my life, um what to be
- 17:25upset about or not upset about, um
- 17:27because, you know, we are we are just
- 17:30temporary and we are doing the best we
- 17:31can while we're here.
- 17:33>> Katie, in addition to your work in
- 17:35theoretical astrophysics, cosmology,
- 17:39writing, and aerial acrobatics, um
- 17:43you're also a poet.
- 17:45>> [laughter]
- 17:45>> I've I've done a little bit of poetry,
- 17:47yeah. I I enjoy that.
- 17:48>> I I'm wondering if it's possible I know
- 17:51I know we talked a little bit about this
- 17:52ahead of time, but my TED friends and I
- 17:55asked if you would read one of your
- 17:56poems today on the TED next stage and
- 18:00you agreed.
- 18:01>> Yeah.
- 18:01>> Um
- 18:02how lucky are we?
- 18:04Um so, can you tell us a little bit
- 18:06about what you're going to share with us
- 18:07today?
- 18:08>> So, I've written a few things here and
- 18:10there. I've done a lot of science
- 18:11writing. I've written a few poems. Um
- 18:12and at some point I was contacted by a
- 18:15sort of graphic uh design company saying
- 18:17that they were putting together a sort
- 18:18of reel of their um
- 18:21their work and they wanted uh they
- 18:22wanted a poem they wanted to create a
- 18:24you know, have a poem to go along with
- 18:26it and could I write a poem about
- 18:27something science-y and then they would
- 18:28illustrate it. They they were called
- 18:30Finger Industries, now they're called
- 18:31Ouch Ouch Health. Um and uh and so I
- 18:34wrote this poem for for their
- 18:37the their sort of demo reel.
- 18:39>> Cool. Wonderful. Would it be okay for
- 18:40you to stand?
- 18:41>> Sure, sure.
- 18:41>> Excellent. Thank you.
- 18:42>> Okay.
- 18:44So, the poem is called Constructs.
- 18:47What do you see when you look at the
- 18:49world?
- 18:50At this infinite variety of objects,
- 18:54colors, textures, weights, flavors.
- 18:58What makes each person, animal, object
- 19:02unique,
- 19:04special?
- 19:06There are around 90 chemical elements
- 19:08naturally found on this planet.
- 19:11But each one
- 19:12hydrogen, oxygen, or carbon
- 19:16is just a construct.
- 19:18A tiny, shivering mass of the same
- 19:22protons, neutrons, and electrons
- 19:26found in any other.
- 19:28Same ingredients,
- 19:30different recipe.
- 19:33We are not essentially our constituent
- 19:35parts.
- 19:37We are the knowledge that unites them.
- 19:41>> Katie Mack.
- 19:42>> [applause]
- 19:43>> Thank you so much.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of A Cosmologist’s Guide to the End of the Universe | Katie Mack and Debbie Millman | TED by TED, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 3,672 words across 568 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.