YT YouTube2Text

YouTube2Text → Transcripts → Как Латынина заставила Айдара БОМБАНУТЬ

Как Латынина заставила Айдара БОМБАНУТЬ — Transcript

by Збигнев (Михаил Куличков) · 6,189 words · 1,007 segments · language en · Watch on YouTube

Open in transcriber Summarize with AI Download SRT/VTT

Full transcript

0:00And Aidar versus Latynina. Our favorite
0:06column.
0:07You support Ukraine.
0:10Where did you get that from?
0:12Oh no, it's very interesting.
0:13I'm a journalist. I'm not a politician.
0:15In this episode, brace yourself, take a
0:17deep breath. Aidar has repeatedly said
0:21what an honest and objective journalist
0:23he is, and how he's not really for
0:26Zelenskyy. Do you feel like this will
0:29be really funny? And he even suggested
0:32something like this to Latynina. Let's
0:34measure it by lists.
0:35Well, it's immediately clear that he's
0:37not just an objective, honest
0:39journalist, who cares only about the
0:40truth, but also a cultured person who
0:42knows how to, well, communicate with
0:44people in a decent and civilized manner
0:46. Well, let's not waste time bowing and
0:49scraping and start analyzing the new
0:51episode of "The Living Nail" with Aidar
0:53and Latynina. Don't forget about likes
0:56and comments. They really are important
0:58. And here we go. So, the new episode
1:01of "The Living Nail" came out, and a
1:03conflict immediately erupted in it.
1:06Literally from the very first words,
1:09they started talking about the recent
1:11elections, those very same elections
1:13after which the liberal media promised
1:15us a general mobilization. Basically,
1:19they talked about the recent elections.
1:21And Aidar, a loyal son of the party, as
1:23Latynina said, didn't go to those
1:25elections. He didn't participate in
1:28those rallies of strange people. Well,
1:30they're talking about the Russian
1:32opposition, which no one reads anymore
1:34and which, apparently, only the CIA
1:36handlers read. And that's only because
1:39they have to, and no one reads them; no
1:41one is interested in them. In short,
1:44none of those rallies they staged were
1:47of any interest to anyone. Even Aidar
1:50wasn't interested. And so, on this
1:53occasion, Aidar decided to ask Latynina
1:55where exactly she lived. Is
1:57it a secret, where do you live?
2:00No need. Why? What's the matter?
2:02Yes, I understand. No, I'm just asking.
2:03No, I mean the country and the places.
2:05No,
2:06no. Aidar, I think we've already
2:07discussed this. And what you're doing
2:10now is truly vile. No, I'm not saying
2:12anything, I'm simply clarifying, asking
2:14: are you saying this is vile? Because,
2:18given the number of threats I'm
2:20receiving—I don't want to, and,
2:21forgive me, not from the Russian side
2:23—I don't want to harp on this issue
2:25any further, but you're forcing it on
2:27me now.
2:28And Latynina immediately replied that
2:30they'd discussed this before. That is,
2:32apparently, they'd once discussed her
2:35not disclosing her country of residence
2:37, her city of residence. And he again
2:40asked the question they'd discussed,
2:42and he doesn't understand the problem.
2:45She says bluntly, "We discussed this, I
2:48won't say it," he asks. But people are
2:50mocking me this way. It's truly rude.
2:53Toxic people do that. And for another
2:5510 minutes, he didn't understand the
2:57problem. Well, Latin feels
2:58uncomfortable saying where she lives,
3:00where she lives, where she lives. Well,
3:02she doesn't want to. She also
3:04emphasized that there are threats
3:06coming from outside Russia. Aidar,
3:09apparently, doesn't understand the
3:10danger. He doesn't understand what the
3:12big deal is. He's discussing this with
3:14someone who, while not being human,
3:16doesn't say where she lives, and then
3:18asks the same question again, but
3:20doesn't understand why the person
3:21doesn't like it. He's a professional,
3:24you can tell right away, a professional
3:26journalist, who knows exactly what to
3:28do and doesn't understand why he needs
3:30to apologize anymore, you know? Look.
3:33No, no, no.
3:34What did you want to ask? Okay, we've
3:36closed the topic. Okay, we apologize.
3:39What did you want to ask?
3:40Why an apology? I asked, I clarified,
3:41and received an answer. What apology? I
3:44did the right thing. I didn't name it.
3:45Well, you've already done everything,
3:46Aidar.
3:46I'll apologize for what. Amazing.
3:50You've
3:50already done everything, Aidar. Thank
3:52you very much. Honestly, after
3:53something like that, you can just...
3:55Don't exaggerate. I didn't name the
3:57country. I didn't name the country. No
3:59need. I checked with you. How can you
4:00ask me the same thing? Don't start
4:03apologizing for discussing this.
4:06According to Latynina, you asked this
4:08question again. That is, she told you
4:10not to ask it. But this Aidar has
4:13absolutely no tact. There is no tact
4:17whatsoever towards his interlocutor.
4:19It's just rudeness. Why? Because, well,
4:22because he thinks he's right and has a
4:24white coat. Generally, the more
4:27confident a person is in their moral
4:29superiority, the more they start to
4:31bully everyone, to be toxic, and so on.
4:35And you know, it's clear that naming
4:38the country isn't that scary, but maybe
4:40, as I understand it, Aidar needed the
4:43city, needed to provide some statistics
4:46about where Latynina lives. Yes, for
4:49some reason it was important to him,
4:51you know, so we could talk about these
4:53elections. But it's her right to refuse
4:55information about where she lives,
4:57where she is. If they discussed it,
4:59well, it's extremely unprofessional to
5:02just talk about it. And you know, it
5:05seems to me that Aidar would then start
5:08saying or teasing something like, well,
5:11why do you live in the West if you
5:13don't like democracy there and all this
5:16Western stuff? It's this—democracy
5:19doesn't like that you live in the West
5:21...because Latin is probably in the
5:22West, although we don't know, but in
5:24any case, she doesn't want to talk
5:26about it. And in this episode, Aidar
5:29sent Yulia Leonidovna to Channel One to
5:32work on this broadcast. He was so angry
5:35, so burned out, that he said: "Go to
5:38Channel One." And then he just went on
5:41and on. Look. And
5:44Yulia Leonidovna,
5:45I think, Aidar, that you don't have the
5:46danger that...Let me tell you,
5:48now, judging by everything, everyone
5:49already has it.
5:50Let's measure penises.
5:51So he told a grown woman, "Let's
5:53measure penises." How could anyone even
5:56think of such a thing? Where was he
5:58trained? Where are his manners? Is he
6:01serious or not? Myers then chimes in,
6:05saying she's also been declared a
6:07foreign agent. So, he chimes in that,
6:10well, all these crazy people, some of
6:13them, are being poisoned by the dreaded
6:15Russian secret services. And that's
6:18what they're afraid of. And Latynina
6:20says she's not afraid of the Russian
6:22secret services. And anyway, you know,
6:25it seems to me that many of these
6:27so-called poisonings are false flag
6:30operations, meaning some MI6 or the CIA
6:32would poison someone with a non-lethal
6:35poison. Then they spent 10 years
6:38screaming about it, these same Russian
6:40opposition figures, the ones they
6:41poisoned, for example. Yes, I'm just
6:43saying that as an option. What does
6:45this mean, the dreaded, dreaded KGB?
6:48They're being persecuted. They, and
6:51they, maybe they really believe it, but
6:53it's a false flag operation, just to
6:55drive them crazy, because otherwise I
6:58don't know why they're endlessly
7:00poisoning these characters with
7:02non-lethal poisons dozens of times. And
7:05now some information about this has
7:07come out. And, frankly, I think the
7:10Russian special services don't need
7:13this crazy opposition at all, because
7:15it's discrediting itself remarkably
7:17well. It means it's losing support
7:21itself. It's talking about itself. Why
7:25waste time on them? Who needs them?
7:28They have no power over Russian minds.
7:31No one will listen to them. After they
7:35talk about decolonizing Russia, after
7:37they talk about essentially destroying
7:39Russia, after they've essentially
7:41started fighting against Russian
7:42citizens, no one will listen to them
7:44anyway. No one needs you. Seriously.
7:49But they won't believe it, that these
7:51are false flag operations. Western
7:53intelligence agencies could be involved
7:55, of course, because Western
7:56intelligence agencies are kind and good
7:58, they couldn't do something like that.
8:01Alatynina is afraid precisely of
8:03threats and dangers from non-Russian
8:06sources. And then, you know what their
8:09conflict is about? Aidar is furious
8:13because Latynina said he supports
8:15Ukraine.
8:17Especially after all those stories
8:19published by the US Department of
8:20Justice, saying, "
8:22I don't mean danger from Russia, I mean
8:24danger from another side."
8:26Now it's not safe.
8:28I understand you. I understand. That's
8:30why, and that's why I clarified whether
8:32it's okay to talk or not.
8:33Yes. Very good. So, you understand
8:35perfectly well that I'm in danger. That
8:38already says a lot about the people you
8:40support.
8:41Who? Let's
8:43continue.
8:44Who do I support?
8:45Ah, Aidar, let's continue your question
8:48.
8:48Who do I support?
8:49About your elections.
8:51Tell me, who do I support
8:53during the elections? You support
8:55Ukraine.
8:56Where did you get that from? Oh, no,
8:59very interesting.
9:00I'm a journalist, not a politician. It
9:02was really funny here, because why did
9:05Latynina really think he supported
9:07Ukraine? You know, I've watched a lot
9:11of "Living Nails" with Aidar, and as
9:13soon as there's criticism of Ukraine or
9:15the West in a broader sense, he
9:17immediately turns into a turtle, winces
9:19, and starts saying, "Let's not discuss
9:21this. Let's instead discuss how bad
9:24things are in Russia." But he doesn't
9:26understand that this is visible. All
9:28the commentators see it, everyone sees
9:30it. But he's like, "No, what are you
9:31talking about? I'm an objective
9:31journalist." And as soon as they say
9:36there are problems in the West, or
9:37problems in Europe, he says, "Let's
9:39discuss how bad things are in Russia."
9:42And he's like, "What does that mean?"
9:43You're changing the subject. Well, we
9:45need context. We need the context of
9:48the world we live in. And all they need
9:51to do is talk about how bad things will
9:52be in Russia, how tomorrow everyone in
9:54the ULAG will be shot. That's it. But
9:56they won't talk about the context, and
9:58he doesn't understand his own bias at
10:00all, and how clearly it's obvious that
10:02he's biased, and how clearly it's
10:04obvious that he's a propagandist. And
10:06he says the following: what specific
10:08statements show that he's for Ukraine?
10:10Well, I
10:11mean, I'm not going to support anyone
10:13on air right now; I'm a journalist.
10:16Oh, okay, more precisely, you don't
10:17support Ukraine, you support
10:18Zelenskyy's government.
10:20What again?
10:20You support Zelenskyy's government.
10:22On what basis did you draw that
10:23conclusion? A false one,
10:25based on your consistent behavior.
10:27For example, I'm asking the wrong
10:28questions.
10:31And now, Aidar, you know perfectly well
10:34whose meat the cat ate. Come on, don't.
10:37Come on.
10:38On what basis did you make those
10:40choices, those conclusions?
10:42Based on your behavior and the way
10:44you're structuring our dialogue. Aidar,
10:47unfortunately, I'm
10:48asking questions. No, I'm asking you
10:49again. I'm asking you the wrong
10:51questions.
10:52Now, Aidar. You're acting not just like
10:57a propagandist, but like a propagandist
10:59caught red-handed. You initially wanted
11:02to set me up. You started with Aidar
11:05again.
11:06Explain to me which specific statements
11:09of mine you interpret, using some
11:11flawed methodology, as support for
11:13Zelenskyy. Especially since I don't
11:16understand the basis for your
11:18non-support for Zelenskyy.
11:20How wonderful. Okay. Such are the
11:22conclusions. I'm a journalist, I don't
11:23support anyone.
11:24You don't support anyone. Excellent.
11:27Let's continue. The thing is, since I
11:30don't know or remember our people, you
11:32can say whatever you want. It's not
11:35like you come on air, accuse me of God
11:38knows what, and can't provide a single
11:40argument,
11:41as often happens.
11:43Yeah.
11:44The threat was asked.
11:46Now I want to say, "Damn, Aidar, every
11:48broadcast you give is in favor of the
11:49West." As soon as you mention the
11:52West's shortcomings, you immediately
11:54gloss over it, deflect it, and so on.
11:56And Aidar starts bombing. Yulia
11:58Leonidovna, you asked a threat agent.
12:01That's the level of your analysis.
12:04Latynina got the impression from Aidar
12:06and thousands of others that he's a
12:08Western propagandist. And look, he's
12:10asking for specific examples. I
12:13remember when Latynina was talking
12:15about the resolution on SE, which the '
12:18out of town' opposition signed about
12:20decolonizing Russia, yes, Aidar said, "
12:23Where is that written there? I didn't
12:25see it there." Basically, he was
12:27wasting his time. Then, when they
12:29rubbed his nose in it, he stopped
12:31talking about it. And there was a lot
12:33of that. But then again, he simply
12:35forgets about it. Yes. That very
12:38resolution about this, you know, Pripas
12:40'opposition, which signed saying it
12:43wants Russia decolonized, those words
12:45are there, and he said, "I didn't see
12:47it. Where is it? What's there? They
12:51rubbed his nose in it, and he
12:52immediately changed the subject. He
12:53stopped talking about it." And there
12:55was a lot of that. He's simply
12:57defending these characters. And it's
12:59obvious to everyone that he's a
13:01propagandist, not a journalist. But he
13:04doesn't understand that. Alatynina says
13:07he's extreme left.
13:09And Aidar, not only are you constantly
13:14interrupting me, you're not even
13:16letting me respond. A cat knows
13:18perfectly well what meat it ate. A cat
13:20knows perfectly well. You know
13:22perfectly well whose side you're on.
13:24And you know perfectly well what
13:26ideology you adhere to. You adhere to
13:28an extreme left ideology. There's
13:30nothing wrong with that. I adhere, by
13:31the way, to a different ideology. You
13:33were talking to a journalist at the
13:35same time. You were addressing my
13:37questions for the audience. It's just
13:39that we've never met in our lives,
13:40we're complete strangers. We've never
13:43had any dialogues off-camera. And you
13:46reached that conclusion solely based on
13:48questions. Just a moment, on a question
13:49. This speaks to the quality of your
13:51analysis. I'm addressing the audience.
13:54This speaks to the quality of your
13:55analysis. You've drawn some completely
13:57false conclusions based on my questions
13:59, without hearing a single statement
14:01from me. Not a single one. I always
14:03present my theories exclusively in the
14:05form of a question. If you don't like
14:09talking to journalists who ask you
14:11uncomfortable questions that seem
14:14ideological, then go to Channel One.
14:18Channel One asks you the questions you
14:20want.
14:20And Aidar, of course, isn't far-left,
14:22because the far-left are communists.
14:25Aidar, he's a left-liberal of the
14:28European type. He's not a communist.
14:31This is what he's been brainwashed with
14:33, these very same European
14:35grenade-sucking media, and that's what
14:37he's broadcasting. And he thinks this
14:39is the objective truth. And he says, "
14:41I'm just asking questions." That's what
14:43journalism is all about: asking
14:45questions. He simply doesn't understand
14:47that when you ask questions, your
14:49questions are also a statement. Because
14:51if you ask questions like, "Why are you
14:54such a bastard? Why are you so bad?"
14:57Well, your questions, they generally
14:59determine the tone of the conversation,
15:00for example, right? Or if you ask
15:03questions: "Why is it so bad in Russia?
15:05Tell me how bad it will be in Russia?
15:07Tell me how they will shoot everyone,
15:09mobilize them." This also sets the tone
15:11. And he says that you are simply
15:13asking questions, but this is just
15:15designed for fools, I think. Nobody
15:17believes this today. And Aidar then
15:19kicks Latynina out to Channel One. He
15:22says that I am asking a question. If
15:24you don’t like such questions, go to
15:26Channel One. As if he is the
15:29editor-in-chief, damn it, of this
15:30living nail. It’s very funny, because
15:33it is you who needs Latynina, and not
15:36you. Aidar would be in general, but no
15:38one would be interested in him if
15:40Latynina didn’t come to him. If, I
15:43think, you put the question to
15:45Venediktov, a recognized agent:
15:47Latynina or Aidar? I think it’s
15:50obvious that he will choose Latynina,
15:52because Latynina has a channel there
15:54with hundreds of thousands of
15:55subscribers, and Aidar's nothing. Aidar
15:57without a living nail, well, no one
15:59will need him, right? Well, at least
16:02less than Latynina. And he kicks her
16:06out on Channel One. He simply says: "Go
16:09away, they won't ask you such brilliant
16:11questions there." Well, that's just
16:13really funny. And, actually, Latynina
16:17goes on to say that she doesn't
16:19remember what he says. Well, because,
16:22like, to give specifics. But in fact,
16:24of course, she remembers. And she gave
16:26him specifics, for example, about the
16:28PACE resolution, that he said that
16:30there is no talk about decolonization
16:32in it, but Latynina said that there is.
16:34That's specifically there. And then he
16:37said: "Yes, yes." And it's the same old
16:39thing. It's the same old thing. She
16:42gave specifics. And when you catch him,
16:45he just stops talking about it. I just
16:47watched those nails and I know what
16:49they're talking about. So, Latynina
16:51goes on and says that she thinks that
16:53off-camera he's the same, Like on
16:55camera. Because Aidar started saying
16:58that you don't know what my real views
17:01are, that asking such questions doesn't
17:05mean I'm any different. And Laterinin
17:08says, "I don't believe that you're any
17:09different." Well, it's true that
17:12Aidar's views are visible, but they're
17:14absolutely obvious. Because if you ask
17:16questions like, "How bad is it in
17:17Russia? How will they shoot everyone
17:19there? And when will the mobilization
17:21happen?""Well, your views are
17:22absolutely obvious. Especially
17:24considering that if you live in Germany
17:27, if you work on a live nail. And, well
17:31, the complex of all this and about the
17:33sowing resolution and other things, he
17:36gives us Aidar, at whom we all laugh.
17:40And for us, he is obviously a
17:42left-liberal propagandist. Well, you
17:44will agree with me in the comments, I
17:46think. And they always try so funny to
17:49seem objective that it is simply
17:51amazing. And they themselves believe it
17:54, after all. And then their
17:55conversation finally, after 10 minutes
17:58of swearing, begins about elections.
18:00And Latynina, she has been against
18:02universal suffrage for a long time, for
18:05many years, and 20 years ago, I think,
18:07she also said that she was against
18:09universal suffrage, because, in short,
18:12it is necessary for the smart to vote,
18:14and the unsmart not to vote. Well, and
18:17taxpayers, that's the topic there. In
18:19Basically, it was like it was at the
18:20end of the 19th century. And she's
18:23either for an enlightened monarchy,
18:25which she said, or for an enlightened
18:27dictatorship, which she even said in
18:29this conversation. And it's clear that
18:32modern elections are everywhere a way
18:34to legitimize power. And for some
18:38reason, left-liberals, they usually
18:39miss the fact that public opinion is
18:41always tuned in the direction of a
18:43specific elite group during elections.
18:47Let's say you have a group of elite
18:50bankers, and they have their own
18:52candidate, and they just take them and
18:55invest a ton of money in them, and
18:58advertising, and the media, and other
19:00people support him, and he wins. Yes,
19:03and that's it. That's how it is. And
19:06people sincerely think that it's them,
19:08it's their opinion, which means they
19:10chose him. In fact, it was simply a PR
19:14campaign, these media technologies that
19:17swayed everyone's opinion. Well, you
19:20see, admitting that your opinion has
19:22been swayed is impossible for a
19:24left-liberal. He...He's the only one
19:27with critical thinking. He doesn't A
19:30zombie. He knows what's propaganda and
19:33what's not. And what's pouring out of
19:35those European Union irons isn't
19:37propaganda, of course; their media is
19:39objective. Well, of course it is. And
19:43those elites with money and
19:44administrative resources will win
19:46everywhere. That is, general elections
19:48are elections of people with money and
19:51power, who, using political
19:52technologies, push this or that point
19:54of view to the people. Sometimes,
19:57entire general elections turn into
19:59coups, using all sorts of technologies
20:01and intelligence agencies. Sometimes,
20:04entire general elections simply turn
20:06into cancellations, for example, as
20:08happened in Romania. That is, if the
20:11resources for duping and propaganda
20:13don't work, they simply up and cancel
20:15the elections. They say:" These
20:17elections were unfair. There was
20:19foreign influence there. "Let's
20:21re-elect again until you choose the
20:24right candidate." That's all there is
20:26to elections. Do you understand? In
20:28elections, they tell the people, as it
20:30were: "You have legitimized this
20:31candidate." If suddenly the people
20:33elect the wrong person, the elections
20:35are simply cancelled. "These are the
20:37same enlightened Europeans. In short,
20:41elections are a joke, a way to
20:43legitimize power. There used to be
20:46monarchies, where the church
20:48legitimized them, now they legitimize
20:50elections, but in general, these
20:52elections are political technologies.
20:56Alatynina is for limited suffrage, as
20:58it was there at the end of the 19th
21:00century, in the 19th century in the USA
21:02, for example.
21:04As soon as universal suffrage was
21:05introduced in the first place, I remind
21:07you that the first one to introduce it
21:09was the unfortunate Bessmork, who was,
21:11of course, a genius, but here he was
21:13seriously mistaken, because he thought
21:15that there would be all these new
21:16people to whom he gave full universal
21:18suffrage. He gave men full universal
21:20suffrage, starting at the age of 25.
21:23They would vote for the central
21:24government, but they went and voted for
21:27soloists. And since then, this disease
21:29has been eating away at Europe. It has
21:31almost eaten away before our very eyes.
21:34And here, accordingly, is how I've
21:36already said that in the current
21:39technical impossibility of ensuring
21:42limited suffrage, which, by the way,
21:44made America and Europe great, all that
21:47remains, unfortunately, is a truly
21:50enlightened monarchy. And Yulia
21:53Leonidovna forgets that back then, for
21:55example, in the 19th century in the USA
21:57, women didn't vote, and not even all
22:03the men voted there—let's not go into
22:06details, yes. And she wouldn't vote
22:10either, if they did it like in the 19th
22:12century, which is what she dreams of;
22:14they simply wouldn't ask her if she
22:15wants these kinds of elections. Maybe
22:18she's fine with that. Or maybe she
22:20thinks they would give it to her. But
22:23look, there's a paradox here. Latynina
22:25isn't liked by the dreaded leftists.
22:27But at the same time, if it weren't for
22:29the dreaded leftists of the early 20th
22:31century, not today's, if it weren't for
22:33those dreaded Waki, she wouldn't be
22:34Latynina. She wouldn't have had an
22:37education, she wouldn't have had equal
22:39rights with men there. She wouldn't
22:41have been able to become a publicist.
22:43Yes, it would have been so large, if it
22:45weren't for those terrible leftists who
22:47gave women the right to vote, and the
22:49right to education, and so on. Because
22:51150 years ago, women didn't have any of
22:54that. And that wasn't that long ago.
22:56Today's left-wing liberals are, of
22:58course, a different story. They do far
23:01more harm there. But the leftists who
23:04allowed women to get an education—
23:06they did a good thing, after all, but
23:07Latinism, it turns out, is against them
23:09. And if it weren't for them, it
23:14certainly wouldn't be where it is. But
23:17okay, let's get back to the left-wing
23:18liberals. Left-wing liberals can't
23:20believe that their vote can be formed.
23:23And Aidar can't believe it either. And
23:27he thinks he has critical thinking,
23:29education, and all the rest. Well,
23:32that's just pride. Pride, yes. He
23:34doesn't understand that elections are
23:35simply the legitimization of power.
23:37Because the legitimization of power in
23:40the form of the church has disappeared,
23:42and this kind of thing has appeared.
23:45And Latynina goes on to say that, in
23:48general, these elections have shown in
23:50Russia that the grant-suckers aren't
23:53against Putin, but against Russia. And
23:55everyone saw this, and even Eidar
23:58himself didn't come. And yes, it turns
24:01out that the grant-suckers who left,
24:04they seem to be aiming at Putin, but
24:07they end up in Russia. How is that
24:10possible? They say," We're against
24:12Putin, "but it turns out we're against
24:13all Russian citizens. That's how it
24:16works in the real world. They talk a
24:18lot about being against Putin, but in
24:20reality, it turns out they're fighting
24:22specifically against all Russians. And
24:25all Russians see this and are acting on
24:26it, not even against Putin. If there
24:29were any other ruler, it would be the
24:31same, right? Because it's very
24:34difficult to separate the two in the
24:36current circumstances. Well, uh, you're
24:38specifically against us, so people from
24:41your circle, like Eidar's circle, or
24:44this opposition circle, don't support
24:47you. They sign papers about
24:49decolonizing us. So, how can we relate
24:51to you? relate? And now it will be our
24:54favorite thing, as it were. Now they
24:57will start throwing out information
24:59from objective liberal journalists who
25:01are for the truth about mobilization in
25:04Russia. They have been doing these
25:05kinds of things constantly in the
25:07spring and fall, for many years now.
25:08Look,
25:09explain what kind of information. Let's
25:12go somewhere and then everything will
25:13be clear. Will there be mobilization or
25:15not? After all, what kind of tightening
25:18is expected after now you will say
25:20again that I am mentioning Zelensky.
25:24Well, just don't mention Zelensky,
25:26explain whether there will be
25:27mobilization in Russia, what kind of
25:29repressions, what tightening is the
25:31Russian government planning? To hell
25:34with Zelensky, we don't live in Ukraine
25:36, enough.
25:36Well, once again. Well, the only source
25:39of information about mobilization in
25:41Russia is Zelensky and a thousand of
25:43his talking heads.
25:45Yeah. And Peskov says there will be no
25:46mobilization, which means it won't
25:48happen. Right? We have no reason not to
25:50believe Peskov. Right? It's not about
25:52what Peskov says. It's about What we
25:54have besides...you know, there's this
25:56thing called the head, which is located
25:58between our two ears.
26:00So, Masha Myers asks, as they like to
26:02say," Will there be a mobilization in
26:04Russia? "" But they've been promising
26:06mobilization after the elections for
26:07two months, and it still hasn't
26:09happened. And they keep hyping things
26:12up, dreaming about mobilization here.
26:17And it's really funny, she says that
26:19Marsha says that they don't live in
26:21Ukraine, so there's no need to discuss
26:24it. But they don't live in Russia
26:26either. Aidar lives in Germany, Masha
26:28lives in Germany. Maybe you shouldn't
26:31discuss Russia then, and you shouldn't
26:33discuss mobilization in Russia, but
26:35they'll probably tell me that you don't
26:37understand this is different. In
26:39general, for the sake of context,
26:41everyone needs to be discussed.
26:42Everyone needs to be discussed for the
26:44sake of context. But they simply don't
26:46like to discuss Ukraine, because they
26:48know that in Ukraine, people are simply
26:50caught on the streets on buses. And as
26:53soon as the conversation turns to that,
26:55objective journalists immediately
26:57change the subject. They'd rather talk
27:00about the mythical mobilization in
27:02Russia, which doesn't exist, which they
27:03constantly predict and which still
27:05doesn't happen. Which they've probably
27:09predicted six times, six times, for the
27:11last twenty years. The second year. And
27:15not once after the partial mobilization
27:17did it happen, but they predicted it
27:19over and over again. And did they then
27:22refute it, as is customary? You know,
27:25supposedly objective media, if you take
27:27it like that, according to the rules of
27:29journalism, if you throw something out
27:30there, throw something out there and it
27:32turns out to be untrue, you have to
27:33refute it. You denied that there would
27:37be a mobilization. None of them ever
27:40refute it. They hyped it up, hyped it
27:43up, hyped it up. It never happened.
27:45They talked about something else later.
27:47And now no one will refute it, because,
27:49of course, they are not media at all,
27:52but simply a propaganda organ of the
27:54West in the information war with Russia
27:56. I think this is obvious to everyone.
27:59And they will predict it again in the
28:01spring. Well, of course, if, uh,
28:04everything continues in the spring,
28:06otherwise it might end, you never know,
28:09I don't know. For context, you can talk
28:12to them about the TCC, but they will
28:13immediately steer the conversation in a
28:15different direction. They don't like
28:17that, They will say: "How is this
28:18possible? We don't live there." They
28:21only want answers about Russia. How bad
28:23it will be there. And Latynina recalls
28:27that in 22, you all said that Russia
28:30would be defeated. Yes, she seems to be
28:34addressing Kaidar and Masha, and Russia
28:37didn't tolerate her or him. And it
28:40really didn't, and they continue to
28:42escalate. Four years have already
28:45passed, they keep escalating and
28:47escalating, and this isn't happening,
28:49and no one refutes anything. And then
28:51Masha asks a question about the
28:53sanctions lifted against Usmanov and
28:55Fridman. Well, the European Union
28:58lifted them. That is, when the European
29:01Union needs it, it lifts sanctions on
29:02whomever it needs. And Latynina says
29:06that these very fugitive Russian
29:08liberals will have problems with their
29:11documents. And, oh, if the European
29:14Union needs it, it will lift sanctions
29:16against Usmanov and Fridman. You know
29:19why I think this is happening? Because
29:21these fugitive left-wing liberals And
29:23the West will kick and despise them,
29:25and they won't return to Russia. Well,
29:28because they will be discriminated
29:30against in the West, and at the same
29:32time, for various reasons, many of them
29:35will not return to Russia. That is,
29:37they have chosen a very unenviable fate
29:39for themselves. And Friedman Usmanov,
29:42if necessary, will have EU business,
29:44for example, or some important issues
29:47there, well, the EU will remove, the EU
29:49will remove. Therefore, those who left,
29:51they simply lost all around. They were
29:54used and screwed. They were used simply
29:57for political purposes, and
29:59discriminated against. And at the same
30:02time, they have problems with documents
30:04with everything. And in the end, you
30:07know, as it will turn out, the EU will
30:09eventually, well, come to an agreement
30:11with Russia somehow. We will live
30:14together in this world anyway, it will
30:16all end anyway. But these emigrants,
30:19they got problems, well, many of them,
30:21at least, will not return to Russia.
30:24They got problems everywhere, they are
30:27kicked everywhere, they are everywhere
30:29around They lost. So why fall for these
30:32psychopaths of pro-Western liberal
30:35propaganda? Why? I don't know. Well,
30:38Latynina also talks about sanctions.
30:41I deeply don't understand the feigned
30:43indignation of the Russian opposition,
30:45which says: "Oh, they took it off
30:47Fridman and Usmanova, but left it on
30:49the poor people." Because in fact, all
30:53that the Russian Judents was doing
30:55during this time was legitimizing
30:57sanctions based on passports. He just
31:00did it very cunningly. He was running
31:04around with his lists of 6,000 people:
31:06we'll ban Gergiev, sanction Andreev,
31:08and so on, and so forth. And all this
31:12was actually using class sentiment, but
31:14it was absolutely the legitimization of
31:16sanctions based on passports. And
31:20because everyone who participated in
31:22this knew perfectly well, but
31:23ultimately, nothing particularly
31:25terrible will happen to Gergiev. But
31:28that same Russian who goes to a bank to
31:31open an account and hears that he's a
31:33second-class citizen, well, there He'll
31:35actually get caught.
31:38And yes, it was the European Union that
31:40started imposing sanctions on Russians
31:42and Russian businesses. And some
31:45Russian measures, they were retaliatory
31:47measures, yes, and our opposition, the
31:50one that went away, supported sanctions
31:52against Russians there and against
31:55Russia. And they didn't think it would
31:58hit them, because they're the closest
32:00in Europe. So it won't just hit Gergiev
32:04, yes, let's say it will hit them first
32:06, yes, and in general, how disgusting,
32:09yes, Gergiev comes there, they start
32:11running around, like, how bad he is,
32:13cancel him. What kind of nonsense is
32:16this? And these people don't understand
32:19that they'll be the first to be
32:21canceled in such a case. It's vile,
32:23vile. Vile and vile, and also stupid.
32:28And it turns out that there is
32:29discrimination against them too. Well,
32:32that's life.
32:34How then, in such conditions, when,
32:36well, actually, probably, Foreign
32:37investors won't want to enter Russia
32:39for a long time, yes, because, well,
32:41it's unclear whether the asset will be
32:42taken away tomorrow or today, or not at
32:44all, and yes, the risks are also too
32:46high. How can we survive? But I think,
32:51in general, they are taking things away
32:53—first of all, of course, in the
32:55run-up to it, they are taking them away
32:57. First of all, they say that this is
33:00supposedly a reaction to everything
33:02that happened in Europe, including the
33:04sanctions, including...there, I repeat,
33:07it's just that Gazprom's factories were
33:09taken away, Lukoil's factories were
33:11simply taken away or forced to sell,
33:13and so on. And Aidar asks: "Will
33:16foreign investors want to enter Russia
33:18after this?""And here I'd like to say
33:21that Aidar, foreign investors aren't
33:24just Europe and the US. The world isn't
33:27just the West. The world is big.
33:29Chinese and Indian investors will be
33:31coming in. Everyone understands why
33:34certain problems are happening there.
33:37And Europe and the US are only a
33:39billion people. Well, maybe a little
33:41over a billion. That's the West. It's
33:44not the whole world. The West will lose
33:46its leadership positions all over the
33:48world. And Aidar goes on to say that
33:51when I say we, I mean Russia. This is
33:54very funny.
33:55And where will we end up at this rate?
33:59We, the world, or Russia?
34:00Russia. Well, when I say we, I mean
34:02Russia. Yes.
34:04Well, for starters, Russia is
34:06increasingly aligning with China,
34:08including economic ones, and also, as I
34:10understand it, on some scientific and
34:13organizational parameters.
34:15Aidar lives in Germany, he apparently
34:17supports the policies of the European
34:19Union. This is evident in all his
34:21questions and takes. And when he says
34:24we, he means Russia. It's hilarious
34:27It's simple. It's hilarious. And
34:30basically, Latynina predicts that
34:32Russia will have some kind of
34:34unification with China, and the world
34:36will experience some degree of internet
34:38sovereignty. And here I'd like to say
34:41that yes, there will be a period of
34:42internet sovereignty. Well, yes, there
34:45will be some, but on the other hand,
34:46the internet will still be shared,
34:48because there are circumvention tools
34:49everywhere. So, the world will be a
34:52dichotomy, where the world is
34:54simultaneously united and divided. But
34:58at the same time, it must be said that
35:01the world will still be more united
35:03than in any other past eras, because a
35:05technology like the internet certainly
35:07didn't exist in the 19th and 21st
35:09centuries. And everyone will need to
35:13take this into account. And what would
35:16you like to say, in conclusion to this
35:18lively question? It was a short
35:20interview, right? And, in fact, Aidar
35:24spent 10 minutes of the 30-minute
35:26interview arguing that he's not for
35:29Zelensky and not for Ukraine. It's very
35:32funny, but I think they didn't prove
35:34enough. We need to justify ourselves
35:36more, prove more, so that they
35:38understand that So that everyone
35:40understands that Aidar and Masha are
35:42objective journalists. They are
35:44completely, they are propagandists for
35:46Ukraine, for Zelensky, and for the West
35:48. It even sounds funny. And then you
35:51know what else I want to, uh, how
35:54should I read? The comments on this
35:57episode, because comments are a
35:59separate funny category. The
36:01commentators are laughing. Comment
36:03number one: Aidar is a journalist, it
36:06sounds funny. Comment number two: quote
36:09:" I'm a journalist. "Laughing emojis.
36:12Exactly. Independent and unbiased. Well
36:16, in short, people are laughing.
36:19Comment number three: A wily agent of
36:21the liberal regional committee wanted
36:23to reveal the location of Latinina to
36:25the decalonizers, but was caught
36:27red-handed like a cheapskate and
36:28outplayed in time by masterful rhetoric
36:30. Well, you know where this style comes
36:33from? Also hilarious, yeah. Comment
36:36number four: Any self-respecting
36:38company, uh, self-respecting company,
36:40would not care about a journalist in
36:41quotes like Aidar. I would have fired
36:44him for professional incompetence after
36:46such an interview. Well, you know, I
36:48think Venediktov doesn't fire him
36:50specifically so he can have these fiery
36:53broadcasts. The fact that he sometimes
36:56gives completely stupid talk shows and
36:58doesn't consider himself a propagandist
37:00, although he is one, is not a bad
37:02thing, because it's very funny. And he
37:06covers many points very well, including
37:09points related to pro-Western
37:11propaganda. Comment number five. Let's
37:15rewatch all the programs with Aidar and
37:17listen, listen to how this journalist
37:20supports no one, in particular,
37:22Zelensky, Ukraine, and the extreme
37:24Levada agenda of its proponents. Yes,
37:27that's also a good comment, because you
37:30can literally hear Aidar's views on any
37:32broadcast, but he thinks he's just
37:34asking questions. Comment number six.
37:38Ayran, why is it so hard to admit what
37:40kind of Zelensky you are? It's not a
37:42disgrace to your circle. Well, first of
37:45all, no Ayran, and Ay Aydar. Ayran is a
37:48fermented milk drink. But in essence,
37:51Aydar just needs to pretend to be
37:53objective in his comment. He can't
37:56directly say that he's for Zelensky.
37:58Then his word will carry less weight.
38:01And so he's supposedly objective and
38:03he's for the truth. But you know what?
38:06Everyone can see how it really is. I'll
38:09leave it at that. I hope you enjoyed it
38:12. And it's blues time. Don't forget to
38:17like, don't forget to subscribe, don't
38:22forget to comment. If you're not a jerk
38:28, there are links to VK and YouTube in
38:32the description. Don't forget
38:36everything. If you're cool, then the
38:41bear will continue to sit here. This
38:55very bear will continue to sit here.
39:11เฮ

About this transcript

This page contains the full transcript of Как Латынина заставила Айдара БОМБАНУТЬ by Збигнев (Михаил Куличков), generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 6,189 words across 1,007 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.

What you can do with it

Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to choose a caption track available on the video.

Free YouTube transcript tool

YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, caption language selection, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.