女性専用車両を常設化すべき!【第80回 日本未来会議】 — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00Should we expand women-only cars? I
- 0:02don't see why not. If you make it so
- 0:04these incidents don't happen, they
- 0:06won't occur in the first place, so if
- 0:07you're really thinking about women, you
- 0:09should take more high-level measures.
- 0:11You don't understand how women feel.
- 0:13I’d be fine with "pervert-only" cars.
- 0:15Oh, that’s not good. I’ll end up
- 0:17having to apologize later.
- 0:26Japan Future Conference.
- 0:31This program is brought to you by the
- 0:33following sponsors. Alright, it has
- 0:35begun. Japan Future Conference. This
- 0:38time, it’s a debate session. These
- 0:41are the members who will liven up the
- 0:42discussion. Let's get started. Yes, so
- 0:48the penalty game will be replying in
- 0:50the comment section, so please do your
- 0:52best.
- 0:55Good luck.
- 0:57Now, today’s theme is this. Should we
- 1:01expand women-only cars?
- 1:05It has been over 20 years since
- 1:07women-only cars were introduced as a
- 1:09measure against groping. While they
- 1:13have some effect, they are also
- 1:14criticized for reverse discrimination
- 1:16and causing congestion. Can safety and
- 1:20fairness coexist? Expansion or
- 1:23abolition? We will debate it thoroughly
- 1:25.
- 1:27With that, we have already split into
- 1:28groups for and against. First, in favor
- 1:31is the Zosu team.
- 1:32Yes.
- 1:33Of course.
- 1:34Yes. So you are saying they should be
- 1:36expanded.
- 1:37Yes. And the opposition is the Noguchi
- 1:39team. What are you talking about?
- 1:41Doing that won't make you popular.
- 1:44Right, so sparks are already flying. As
- 1:49you all know well, during commuting
- 1:51hours, over 50%of all groping incidents
- 1:53occur during the morning rush.
- 1:59Women-only cars are currently set up
- 2:01for the morning and evening commutes.
- 2:08We are here to debate whether to expand
- 2:10them to all-day service—from first
- 2:12train to last—or whether that is the
- 2:14wrong approach. Yes. Now, our first
- 2:19sub-theme is this.
- 2:22We will discuss the idea that "the risk
- 2:24of groping isn't limited to commute
- 2:25times."
- 2:28Let's begin.
- 2:29Eh, is that right?
- 2:30Yeah.
- 2:31Do you have any counterarguments?
- 2:33Yeah.
- 2:33That is true, but...
- 2:35Are those on the opposition side saying
- 2:37we should get rid of women-only cars?
- 2:39Or should we expand them? I think
- 2:43women-only cars should be permanent,
- 2:45and it's obviously a good thing.
- 2:48But, maybe it's fine during the day?
- 2:52The discussion is whether it should be
- 2:54permanent, and in a world of both men
- 2:56and women, why are there no men-only
- 2:58cars? Why only women-only cars?
- 3:02Well, I wouldn't mind if there were
- 3:03men-only cars, actually. I think it
- 3:10would be fine to have a pervert-only
- 3:12car.
- 3:12Ah, that's not good.
- 3:13Why? Why not?
- 3:15How would a pervert-only car work?
- 3:17Then the people who want to grope and
- 3:18those who want to be groped could just
- 3:20ride together. Hey, that’s just a sex
- 3:21industry business.
- 3:22A concept sex service.
- 3:23Eh, what's wrong with that?
- 3:25What's wrong? That's what's wrong.
- 3:26I’m actually getting a little excited
- 3:28talking about it.
- 3:28No. Stop it.
- 3:29Yes. This conversation is over. Eh,
- 3:31isn't it interesting? Talking about it
- 3:33at a meetup or something...
- 3:34Every YouTuber would probably get in on
- 3:36it.
- 3:36Anyway, let's get back to the point.
- 3:38You want to make women-only cars
- 3:39permanent, right?
- 3:40Yes.
- 3:41Over 50%of incidents only happen
- 3:44between 6:00 and 9:00 AM. Do you know
- 3:47how many groping incidents occur? It's
- 3:49about 1,000 a year. Is the cost of
- 3:53maintaining women-only cars in all
- 3:5550,000 train cars worth eliminating 500
- 3:57incidents a year? You don't even know
- 4:04...wait, what was the number of
- 4:05incidents you just said? Per year?
- 4:09About 1,000.
- 4:10About 1,000. That’s just the number
- 4:12of reports filed, right? Exactly. Yeah.
- 4:15In fact, when I was in high school—
- 4:17the JK girls I know—they have all
- 4:19been victims of groping.
- 4:21Yeah. Yeah.
- 4:22And I have never seen a single one of
- 4:24them file a police report.
- 4:25So there could be millions of cases.
- 4:27Exactly. So it’s possible that the
- 4:29real number is 10, 20, or maybe even
- 4:31100 times higher. I understand the
- 4:33argument about making them permanent.
- 4:36The point is that most of it happens
- 4:37during commute times.
- 4:39So the question is, is it necessary to
- 4:41keep them all the time?
- 4:43If you're asking whether it's necessary
- 4:45or not, it is, isn't it?
- 4:47Because it eliminates the risk. Why
- 4:48wouldn't you? Yeah.
- 4:49I want to know the reason why you
- 4:51wouldn't do it.
- 4:51Because there are people like you out
- 4:53there. That’s why some people say
- 4:56it’s okay to grope women who aren't
- 4:57riding in the women-only cars. That’s
- 5:01not what’s being said. Wait.
- 5:02No, that’s wrong. Please put aside
- 5:04the "pervert-only car" idea you
- 5:05mentioned.
- 5:05No, I’m saying the pervert-only car
- 5:07exists...
- 5:08Shut up. Hey, don't ignore me. That—
- 5:10Wait a minute, wait a minute. Since
- 5:12we’ve set this up, I’d like to get
- 5:14back to the topic of dedicated cars.
- 5:16I want to return to that—for example,
- 5:18you talked about yourself and your
- 5:19friends earlier. Since I have two women
- 5:26here, I’d like to ask: based on your
- 5:27own experience or stories from friends,
- 5:29what proportion of groping incidents
- 5:31happen during morning commutes or
- 5:33school hours, versus other times during
- 5:35the day? Give me a rough estimate.
- 5:40About 80 or 90 percent in the morning.
- 5:45Some think that because 50 percent of
- 5:47cases happen in the morning, only the
- 5:49morning is necessary, but for women,
- 5:51it’s not just about the act of being
- 5:52groped, it’s a psychological issue.
- 5:56It’s the fear of the possibility of
- 5:58being groped that’s the problem. And
- 6:00I don’t think that’s limited to
- 6:02just 6:00 to 9:00 AM.
- 6:04Yeah.
- 6:04Yeah.
- 6:05Well, in this age of LGBT, there are
- 6:07people who identify as women groping
- 6:09other women, or people dressing up as
- 6:11women......to commit acts of groping.
- 6:13I think we can go by biological sex for
- 6:15that.
- 6:16If you are biologically female, then
- 6:18you are a woman. I think it’s fine to
- 6:20treat them as women, but those who are
- 6:22not biologically female shouldn’t be
- 6:23in the women-only cars. The rules can
- 6:25just be the same as they are for public
- 6:27baths, based on biological sex.
- 6:28Also, you probably don’t know since
- 6:30you don't take the train, but in the
- 6:32evening, there are, uh, women-only—
- 6:34not women-only, women’s appear—
- 6:36appearances. Yeah. Yes.
- 6:39There are many train lines that don't
- 6:40have women-only cars, and even though
- 6:42they get crowded in the evening,
- 6:43groping doesn’t really happen there.
- 6:46So, doesn't that suggest that we don't
- 6:48necessarily need them 24 hours a day?
- 6:50Ah, but they actually do have the
- 6:52women-only cars during the evening
- 6:53commute now.
- 6:54Wait, why not make them mandatory
- 6:56instead? It doesn't cost anything.
- 6:58I don't see why not. If it's mandatory,
- 7:00it becomes a rule, so it has to be done
- 7:03nationwide, right? I'm from Miyazaki,
- 7:05and we only have two cars per train.
- 7:06Yeah.
- 7:07So if one car is for women and one is
- 7:09for men, wouldn't that be awful? That,
- 7:11like—
- 7:12That might be true.
- 7:13But that’s what the rule would be.
- 7:14That’s what "mandatory" means, right?
- 7:16Then let's just ask them to add a third
- 7:17car. I wonder if that’s even possible
- 7:19.
- 7:19They wouldn't pay that cost.
- 7:20No, well, let's just stick to cities
- 7:22for this. I mean, come on.
- 7:24In Miyazaki, there are only two cars.
- 7:26If it's "mandatory," it means
- 7:28nationwide, so...
- 7:29There might even be places with just
- 7:30one car.
- 7:31You call women "jaw-dropping" or
- 7:33something?
- 7:34They have to protect their bodies, like
- 7:36when they're pregnant.
- 7:37So, as a society, we should be kind to
- 7:39women, treat them like princesses,
- 7:41right? Huh?
- 7:42You should treat women with special
- 7:44care.
- 7:44Oh, is that it?
- 7:45Yeah.
- 7:45Oh, it’s not just about birthdays.
- 7:47Well, is that enough?
- 7:49It's about creating a society where we
- 7:51cherish women.
- 7:52Um, we're debating in three groups now,
- 7:54so we don't need the car thing.
- 7:56Right. With that said, let's move on to
- 7:59the next topic. 2.
- 8:01Number two is this.
- 8:03The question is, isn't this reverse
- 8:05discrimination against men? As you were
- 8:08touching on earlier.
- 8:10Wait, do men even get molested?
- 8:12Never.
- 8:12It's not zero.
- 8:13But it's extremely rare compared to
- 8:15women, right?
- 8:15Yes. Extremely rare.
- 8:17Then isn't it fine to make women-only
- 8:19cars mandatory? Since it's so rare.
- 8:23When I heard the topic, the first thing
- 8:25I thought of was how many convenience
- 8:26stores have women-only stalls lately.
- 8:32Convenience stores have women-only
- 8:34toilets and unisex toilets, right?
- 8:36That's exactly it.
- 8:37You're waiting forever, right? I was
- 8:39waiting there. Then, just when I
- 8:40thought someone finally came out, it
- 8:42was a woman.
- 8:43I got so annoyed. So, if the same thing
- 8:46happens on a train...
- 8:48Wouldn't that be annoying? Your
- 8:50thoughts?
- 8:51If you say "anyone can ride in either
- 8:53one," the other one just gets crowded,
- 8:55right? So, I'd like to ask for
- 9:00counterarguments, excluding the opinion
- 9:02that it's unfair for only men to have
- 9:04to ride in crowded cars all the time.
- 9:08Well, but if there's a system to
- 9:09prevent false accusations, isn't that
- 9:11fine?
- 9:12Oh, I see the men's side too. I see it
- 9:14from the men's perspective a lot,
- 9:15That would be fine if only men rode in
- 9:17those other cars.
- 9:18But in the end, women will still get on
- 9:20, right? Even if it's a car for men,
- 9:22women will still board other cars, and
- 9:23false accusations will happen there too
- 9:25. So, does that mean we should just
- 9:27create cars specifically for men?
- 9:28No, because that’s...it’s just
- 9:30unpleasant.
- 9:32Look, the problem arises because no one
- 9:34knows who is doing what in a packed
- 9:35train, so to solve the root problem, we
- 9:37should increase the number of cars or
- 9:39trains to avoid overcrowding. Then
- 9:42molestation would naturally decrease,
- 9:44so isn't that a better way to solve it
- 9:46than separating men and women?
- 9:48But you know, I think dedicated cars
- 9:50are better to have, even if they aren't
- 9:52strictly necessary. I personally think
- 9:54we should have them.
- 9:55I don't think we need them.
- 9:57I don't think we need them. Right.
- 9:58The problem is the overcrowding, after
- 10:00all.
- 10:01Yeah.
- 10:03Admitting they exist, they are
- 10:05currently time-based, so for example,
- 10:07if they end at 11:00, are you going to
- 10:09say "Okay, get off" at 10:59?
- 10:14No, that's why there's no need for
- 10:16dedicated cars on trains. Since packed
- 10:24trains are what cause these problems—
- 10:26like things getting stolen from bags—
- 10:28wouldn't it be better for society to
- 10:30solve the issue by not creating those
- 10:32overcrowded conditions where you can't
- 10:33keep an eye on things?
- 10:36That costs too much, so within the
- 10:38existing assets—for example, if there
- 10:41are 12 cars, let's make 2 of them
- 10:43women-only. If just doing that lowers
- 10:45the risk of molestation for the time
- 10:47being,
- 10:48No, I think that costs more than just
- 10:50adding one more car. Because if you
- 10:53have 10 cars and make 2 of them
- 10:54women-only, that’s still overcrowding
- 10:56, right?
- 10:58Since men can't enter those empty cars,
- 11:00if you consider transport costs during
- 11:02those completely empty hours, I think
- 11:04it’s definitely better not to have
- 11:06them as just extra cars.
- 11:08I think it would pay for itself in
- 11:09terms of sales versus the costs
- 11:11involved. What’s interesting is that
- 11:14earlier, you mentioned that, let alone
- 11:15the sentiment, women-only cars are
- 11:17unnecessary to begin with.
- 11:21That’s why I’ve been saying from
- 11:23the start that the real problem is that
- 11:25by creating women-only cars, companies
- 11:26and society can act as if they’ve
- 11:28already taken measures. They should be
- 11:35thinking of separate mechanisms to
- 11:37prevent groping, but they make
- 11:38women-only cars because it’s the
- 11:40cheapest option, when really they
- 11:41should be introducing AI cameras or
- 11:43other methods. And yet
- 11:45Exactly, and that’s why the problem
- 11:47is that it creates a false sense of
- 11:49accomplishment; if they really cared
- 11:51about women, they should implement
- 11:53higher-level, more costly measures. So,
- 11:56the very idea of women-only cars is
- 11:58extremely childish.
- 12:01How should I put it? It's like saying,
- 12:03"It's cheap, so this should be fine."
- 12:05I want to get into this point, but how
- 12:07is it actually? They already exist now,
- 12:09don't they? Even if they aren't fully
- 12:11exclusive. Do you think this is
- 12:13discrimination?
- 12:14I don't think it's either.
- 12:15I don't think it's either. I don't
- 12:17think it’s discrimination; in the end
- 12:19, I think most people see it as a
- 12:21difference between equality and
- 12:22fairness, and view it as a fair move.
- 12:26So, as for whether this should be done
- 12:2824 hours a day, I really think that’s
- 12:30a negligible difference.
- 12:31Oh, that
- 12:32Is it okay to accept reverse
- 12:33discrimination just because it's for
- 12:35women?
- 12:35If whether or not to make it 24 hours
- 12:37is a negligible point, isn't this the
- 12:39real issue? Exactly.
- 12:40Earlier, when Kanda-san asked if
- 12:42groping by women against men exists,
- 12:44the response was, well, it’s not zero
- 12:46, but it does happen a little. And then
- 12:49there was the point that if it only
- 12:51happens a little, then it’s not
- 12:52really necessary, right? If we assume
- 12:59that incidents of molestation are
- 13:01mostly concentrated during morning and
- 13:03evening rush hours, then just like the
- 13:04argument that there’s almost no time
- 13:06when women are harassing men, what do
- 13:08you all think about the point of having
- 13:10women-only cars during the day when
- 13:11these incidents barely happen?
- 13:19I’ve heard the opinion that people
- 13:21who have experienced it, even once, are
- 13:23often mentally affected to the point
- 13:24where they get traumatized and can’t
- 13:26ride trains or buses anymore, so they
- 13:28can only ride women-only cars.
- 13:32And I think that, as you just said,
- 13:34really is a mental health issue.
- 13:38I understand that those people can’t
- 13:40ride them, but you know, outside of
- 13:42commuting, isn’t it still scary to be
- 13:44in the same space with men looking at
- 13:45you? Yeah.
- 13:50Well, since there are times reserved
- 13:52for women during commutes, is there
- 13:54really a need to go out of your way to
- 13:55ride at other times?
- 14:00But, you know, trains aren't just for
- 14:01commuting when you’re traveling, are
- 14:03they?
- 14:04I don’t think these issues should be
- 14:06discussed through individual cases. If
- 14:08we did that, even though molestation
- 14:09against men is very rare, if one of
- 14:11those people happened to be my friend
- 14:13who was groped and became a mess, then
- 14:15...Arguments like "please make a
- 14:17men-only car for him" would also become
- 14:19possible.
- 14:19Oh, okay.
- 14:20Okay.
- 14:21Yeah. Men-only, okay.
- 14:23I do think there’s a need for
- 14:24men-only cars for men, too. Then
- 14:26there’s probably a need for "pervert
- 14:28cars" as well. But these things are
- 14:29created because there is high demand,
- 14:31right?
- 14:31And there is a demand for women-only
- 14:33cars.
- 14:34But then, if that’s the case...
- 14:36Yes. So, with that said.
- 14:38From here on, it will be an open
- 14:40discussion. I won't set a specific
- 14:42topic, so based on the current
- 14:44discussion, feel free to speak your
- 14:45minds—hey, I’m talking because you
- 14:47were silent. I wasn't.
- 14:49I wasn't silent at all.
- 14:51Quiet, shut up.
- 14:53Hey, I haven't been holding back at all
- 14:55.
- 14:55You know, everyone here is being a bit
- 14:57too intellectual, rational, and
- 14:59clean-cut.
- 14:59Yeah.
- 15:01In this world, girls are princesses and
- 15:03are treated specially. Men just have to
- 15:06endure it. Uh, do you have a response
- 15:10to the pro-side's argument?
- 15:12Most of it comes out, anyway.
- 15:15If women need to be protected, it's
- 15:17because their social status has
- 15:19historically been lower, making it hard
- 15:21for them to speak up; when men are
- 15:22groped, everyone just treats it as a
- 15:24joke—it's happened to me, too.
- 15:27Back then, I just turned it into a
- 15:28funny story.
- 15:29But women don't have the option to turn
- 15:30it into a funny story like that. In
- 15:32short, there's no demand for it.
- 15:33Exactly.
- 15:34Yeah.
- 15:34You guys are idiots. Is it really okay
- 15:36to expand a discussion about things
- 15:38like women-only train cars into an
- 15:39argument about gender inequality? Will
- 15:40this video stay up?
- 15:41It's fine.
- 15:42Ah, you'll end up having to apologize
- 15:44later.
- 15:44I won't be doing that.
- 15:46I’m for equal opportunity between
- 15:48genders.
- 15:49Women were the weaker side to begin
- 15:51with, right? So even if there are
- 15:53arrests for groping here, the real
- 15:55number is probably tens of times higher
- 15:57. No, no, no, no—we haven't said a
- 16:00single word about not needing
- 16:01countermeasures against groping.
- 16:03I know. But jumping to extreme ideas
- 16:06like AI cameras is just wrong. Uh.
- 16:09Hmm. Then is this really the optimal
- 16:11solution for preventing groping?
- 16:13Then what about universalizing it? What
- 16:15if you universalized it and then
- 16:16installed AI cameras?
- 16:17No, that's why—
- 16:18So, should it not be universalized?
- 16:20Tell me why it shouldn't be
- 16:21universalized. You take taxis so you
- 16:23probably don't know, but on a 15-car
- 16:24train like the Sobu Line, if only, say,
- 16:26car number two were a women-only car
- 16:27and someone got groped there, the
- 16:29conversation would just end with people
- 16:30asking why they didn't ride in the
- 16:32women-only car. Is that okay with you?
- 16:33No one would say that.
- 16:34No, they would, they would. This
- 16:36problem will absolutely happen. So,
- 16:38does that mean it shouldn't be
- 16:39universalized?
- 16:40Look, you're just pointing out the
- 16:42flaws in universalization; you haven't
- 16:44given a single reason why it shouldn't
- 16:46be done. In other words, it should be
- 16:48universalized.
- 16:49Think about it.
- 16:50That’s why if you make women-only
- 16:51cars universal, people will say, "Why
- 16:53didn't you ride the women-only car when
- 16:55there was one?" That's all I'm saying.
- 16:57I get it. If women-only cars increase,
- 17:00it basically separates men and women.
- 17:02Yeah.
- 17:02Yeah. And then, you know, the
- 17:04interaction disappears, right? That's
- 17:06what I hate. Nobi-san, when you ride
- 17:09the train as a man, [do you look at] a
- 17:11girl's skirt or...
- 17:12You want to see stuff like that, right?
- 17:14That's not it.
- 17:15Yes, you do.
- 17:16Like a mixed-gender bath in Germany.
- 17:17That's not it at all. Well, that is...
- 17:22Well, we've heard enough about Nobby's
- 17:23opinion that women should be treated
- 17:25specially, and the opposing view that
- 17:27the women-only car system itself is
- 17:29wrong, so let's try discussing a
- 17:30different point.
- 17:35For me, I just want it to be one way to
- 17:37eliminate false accusations. That...
- 17:46For now, I just want at least one
- 17:47women-only car to exist to reduce false
- 17:50accusations against men. At least until
- 17:53AI cameras become widespread.
- 17:54Yeah.
- 17:55The reason is, there are all sorts of
- 17:57false accusations, right? Like that
- 18:01movie "I Just Didn't Do It," where
- 18:03someone was framed. In cases like that,
- 18:07if a woman says so, it's 99.9%game over
- 18:10.
- 18:10So, I really want to keep them
- 18:12separated.
- 18:13Yeah.
- 18:14By the way, if there's a women-only car
- 18:16and a regular one, which do you take?
- 18:19I take the women-only car.
- 18:20Absolutely.
- 18:23But what if the women's car is packed?
- 18:26Oh, I think I could still squeeze in. I
- 18:28want to take the women's car.
- 18:30Yeah. I'd take it whenever possible.
- 18:34It's just that there are time
- 18:35restrictions, like 6 to 9 AM, so I
- 18:37never know if I can use it, which is
- 18:39probably why it hasn't fully caught on.
- 18:42If we agree that having women-only cars
- 18:44is a good thing, then it should be more
- 18:46widely promoted. If they're going to
- 18:47exist.
- 18:48Make them stand out more—paint them
- 18:50pink, put roses on them or something.
- 18:51Sometimes they do. But men still end up
- 18:53getting in there, don't they?
- 18:55Shibuya Station is all pink. Also, the
- 18:58argument that cars are empty outside of
- 19:00those hours is wrong.
- 19:02I take the Marunouchi Line a lot, and
- 19:04it's packed almost until the very last
- 19:06train.
- 19:06That's because it's near the last train
- 19:08.
- 19:08No, it's always packed.
- 19:09Well, that's just because it's the
- 19:11Marunouchi Line.
- 19:11True.
- 19:12Yeah.
- 19:12Yeah.
- 19:13So, if you're worried about those risks
- 19:15and want to make every car women-only,
- 19:17well, Miyazaki Prefecture only has
- 19:19two-car trains anyway.
- 19:22In Miyazaki, just ride together.
- 19:25Well, the discussion has really heated
- 19:27up, so I'd like to move on to the final
- 19:29judgment. Before that, we'll take a
- 19:31short commercial break, so everyone try
- 19:33to guess who will win. Please also take
- 19:35this opportunity to subscribe to the
- 19:37channel.
- 19:37Professor?
- 19:39Still doing it?
- 19:40That's enough.
- 19:42The topic for today's Japan Future
- 19:44Conference is this. "Resolve call
- 19:46center staffing shortages with AI."
- 19:50There's no way current AI technology
- 19:52can handle complex call center tasks,
- 19:54right?
- 19:55No, we don't need any of that.
- 19:57I'll handle everything myself.
- 19:58No mistake about it.
- 19:59Mr. Noguchi, please give us the final
- 20:01verdict.
- 20:02It is passed.
- 20:03Right.
- 20:03Yes.
- 20:04Whether it's technical issues or sheer
- 20:06willpower, Callways can solve them.
- 20:08Really?
- 20:09Huh.
- 20:14For AI phone support, Callways is the
- 20:17answer. Search for "Callways" for more
- 20:23details.
- 20:25Alright, so we've been discussing
- 20:27whether women-only train cars should be
- 20:29permanent. Honestly, I’m still torn.
- 20:36To be fair, before we started, I didn't
- 20:38think it was necessary to have them
- 20:40during off-peak hours. However, after
- 20:48listening to Sarasa-san and Mi-san’s
- 20:49opinions, I was really moved by the
- 20:51point that women who have been
- 20:52traumatized by molestation even once
- 20:54need an environment where they can ride
- 20:56the train with peace of mind,
- 20:57regardless of whether it's crowded or
- 20:59not. So, the winner is here.
- 21:07And don't you dare give me a handicap.
- 21:12It's my turn, isn't it?
- 21:13Like hell it is.
- 21:16Well, as a moderator's privilege, I'd
- 21:18like to take this opportunity to share
- 21:20with you all that there is actually a
- 21:21rule that men in wheelchairs are
- 21:23allowed to ride in women-only cars. But
- 21:27, like, do you really think you can
- 21:28just ride it?
- 21:29No way.
- 21:31So, in the end, where are people in
- 21:33wheelchairs supposed to go on a packed
- 21:35train? The reality is that they still
- 21:38can't ride. So, while the question of
- 21:41whether to keep women-only train cars
- 21:43is an important issue, I’d really
- 21:45like for them to create a system where
- 21:47not only wheelchair users, but also
- 21:48those who need a cane to walk, can ride
- 21:50the train with peace of mind—even if
- 21:52we don’t go as far as having cars
- 21:54dedicated entirely to wheelchairs. Like
- 21:59for children, yes, exactly, those with
- 22:01strollers; or maybe separate cars for
- 22:03parents, or even stroller-only cars.
- 22:05Yes, exactly.
- 22:10Alright, so this time we've been
- 22:11discussing the topic of women-only
- 22:13train cars. I’m sure you all have
- 22:16various opinions, so please feel free
- 22:18to share them in the comments section.
- 22:21Also, if you found this program
- 22:22interesting, please don't forget to hit
- 22:24the like button and subscribe to the
- 22:26channel. With that said, I’ll see you
- 22:28all next time. Thank you very much.
- 22:31Redelivery should be a paid service. If
- 22:33you want a redelivery, it should cost
- 22:35something like 600 yen. You’re an
- 22:37adult; you said you’d receive it on
- 22:38this day, so just receive it.
- 22:39But what if you have a stomach ache and
- 22:41have to go to the bathroom?
- 22:42That’s true.
- 22:42Yeah, like registering that status on a
- 22:45logistics app.
- 22:46The Japan Future Conference is looking
- 22:48for sponsors and presenters to support
- 22:50us.
- 22:50Please check the description box for
- 22:52details on how to apply. Make sure to
- 22:53subscribe to the channel, too.
- 22:55We look forward to hearing from you.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of 女性専用車両を常設化すべき!【第80回 日本未来会議】 by 日本未来会議, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 3,817 words across 688 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.