5 действий ПОСЛЕ публикации, которые РЕШАЮТ судьбу ролика — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00You hit publish. Then begins a ritual
- 0:02that everyone knows. Send a link to
- 0:04friends in a chat, check Studio an hour
- 0:06later to see 18 views, go change the
- 0:08thumbnail, decide by evening that the
- 0:10video is a total flop, and delete it
- 0:12just to be safe. Familiar situation.
- 0:14And now, the main thing. Almost
- 0:16everything you do in those first 24
- 0:18hours is based on advice that no one
- 0:19has ever verified. It’s just passed
- 0:22from video to video like an urban
- 0:24legend. I went and checked. I went to
- 0:27the channel where YouTube employees—
- 0:28the very people who handle search and
- 0:30recommendations—answer creators '
- 0:31questions directly. Some of the advice
- 0:34turned out to be true, while some was
- 0:36fiction that everyone simply repeats.
- 0:37Hello everyone. My name is Alexey. I am
- 0:40a YouTube producer. I've been producing
- 0:41YouTube channels for over 5 years. And
- 0:43today we will look at five things you
- 0:45do after publishing. And for each one,
- 0:47I’ll tell you what the platform
- 0:49itself thinks about it. Watch until the
- 0:51end, because the finale will take away
- 0:53the biggest fear of any creator. And
- 0:55there will be numbers that YouTube
- 0:56calculated across hundreds of thousands
- 0:58of channels, no speculation. Let's go.
- 1:00Let's start with what everyone does.
- 1:02This is the least obvious thing in the
- 1:03whole episode. It’s about the link to
- 1:05a fresh video that you send to friends
- 1:07in a group chat, at work, or with
- 1:08family. "Let them watch, they'll add
- 1:10some views, the video will take off."
- 1:12You've heard this advice too. "Don't
- 1:14send the link right away." And the
- 1:16advice is actually correct. But it's
- 1:17explained wrongly everywhere. So much
- 1:19so that because of the poor explanation
- 1:21, half of all creators do the exact
- 1:23opposite. Usually, you're told: "
- 1:25External traffic doesn't count, people
- 1:26come from links, don't finish watching,
- 1:28and ruin your retention." The platform
- 1:31claims the exact opposite. Traffic
- 1:33sources are separated, external traffic
- 1:34counts just fine, and sharing itself
- 1:36doesn't hurt the channel. The harm
- 1:38comes from a different angle. A person
- 1:39clicks your link directly in the
- 1:41messenger app. The YouTube app doesn't
- 1:43open. They end up in an embedded
- 1:45browser window where they aren't logged
- 1:46in. And since they aren't logged in,
- 1:48the video doesn't show up in their
- 1:49watch history. And then YouTube thinks
- 1:51the person hasn't seen your video, so
- 1:53after a while, it recommends the same
- 1:55video again, and they skip it—after
- 1:57all, they already watched it. And the
- 1:59platform reads this skip clearly. "Not
- 2:01interested." Which means there's no
- 2:03point in showing them your next videos.
- 2:05It turns out that with your own hands,
- 2:07you taught the algorithm not to show
- 2:08your videos to your own friends. Like
- 2:10this video if you'll stop sending the
- 2:11link immediately after publishing
- 2:13starting today. What should you do
- 2:14instead? Don't send a link, send an
- 2:15announcement. "Uploaded a new video.""
- 2:17Go check it out." Those who want to
- 2:18will go into YouTube themselves and
- 2:20watch it properly, with history and
- 2:21retention. And send the link the next
- 2:23day, when the organic traffic has
- 2:24already gathered. This, by the way, is
- 2:26an official recommendation from the
- 2:27platform. Moving on. You have heard the
- 2:29next piece of advice more than once. An
- 2:31hour has passed, and you see a 2%
- 2:32click-through rate. You reach out to
- 2:35change the thumbnail, and then they
- 2:36tell you: "Stop, let the video breathe
- 2:38for at least 2 days. The algorithm is
- 2:40just testing the waters." The logic
- 2:41behind this seems reasonable. You
- 2:43change the thumbnail, you mess up the
- 2:45algorithm's settings, it studies the
- 2:46video anew, and everything it has
- 2:48accumulated is reset. It sounds
- 2:50convincing, and I used to repeat this
- 2:51version myself, until I went to check
- 2:53it. Changing a thumbnail or title does
- 2:56not trigger any re-ranking. That's
- 2:58verbatim from the search and discovery
- 3:00team. There is simply no special
- 3:02mechanism that reacts to such changes.
- 3:05The algorithm follows the audience. You
- 3:06set a thumbnail that people click on
- 3:08more often. The click-through rate goes
- 3:10up. The platform shows the video to
- 3:12more people. Views follow accordingly.
- 3:14No resetting whatsoever. So, if a video
- 3:16is underperforming, I test thumbnails
- 3:18and titles as much as needed, even
- 3:20after an hour. But you probably have a
- 3:22question now: "Listen, where did that
- 3:24advice even come from?" It didn't come
- 3:25out of thin air, right? It didn't.
- 3:27There is a real danger, but it lies in
- 3:29a completely different place. You go
- 3:31for hard clickbait, people will click
- 3:32more often, but they will stop watching
- 3:34until the end. The video must deliver
- 3:36on what the new thumbnail promises.
- 3:38Otherwise, the click-through rate will
- 3:40rise, but retention will crash, and
- 3:41views will go down along with it. You
- 3:43can and should change things, but you
- 3:45shouldn't lie. One of my client cases
- 3:47is an osteopath for whom we made videos
- 3:50for a very long time, and we had a
- 3:52couple of instances where a video got
- 3:54very, very few views. So. And we simply
- 3:57completely redid the video's SEO from
- 3:59scratch. And after a while, the video
- 4:01suddenly started gaining traction. But
- 4:03here, in fact, the accumulated effect
- 4:05also comes into play. When you upload
- 4:08new videos, old ones are pulled along
- 4:10behind them. Therefore, if those old
- 4:12thumbnails and those videos you have
- 4:14have a low CR, a really low CR, change
- 4:16them, and over time they will simply
- 4:18grow, even if they stopped getting
- 4:20impressions. The main thing is to
- 4:22publish content regularly. And if you
- 4:25were honestly waiting two days and
- 4:26watching your video sink, you don't
- 4:28have to wait anymore. Head down to the
- 4:30comments and admit honestly, did you
- 4:31drop a link in a group chat right after
- 4:33publishing, or were you perhaps afraid
- 4:34to touch the thumbnail? Did that happen
- 4:36or not? I am interested to learn more.
- 4:38The thing that a bunch of creators have
- 4:39won with. You upload a video and
- 4:41immediately start on the next one
- 4:42because you need three a week,
- 4:44otherwise the algorithm will forget you
- 4:45, and so on. A boost for frequency
- 4:47doesn't actually exist. I am quoting
- 4:49the platform's response. The system has
- 4:51no rules that look at how often a
- 4:53channel uploads. They provide the
- 4:55example themselves. The Spider channel
- 4:57posts 30-second videos about once a
- 5:00month, and they rack up 10 million
- 5:02views each. Once a month, 30 seconds,
- 5:0510 million. Consistency matters in
- 5:07exactly one case. If your format is
- 5:08built on regularity and your audience
- 5:10is used to visiting every day, then
- 5:12keep the rhythm. That’s fair enough.
- 5:14This is especially well-suited for
- 5:16expert content. In all other cases,
- 5:17think of it this way: you’re forcing
- 5:19out three videos a week. That’s 12
- 5:20weak episodes in a month. The audience
- 5:22watches them and slowly decides that
- 5:24the channel has become boring. The
- 5:26algorithm has nothing to do with it.
- 5:27People just stop clicking on them.
- 5:28Release four videos a month, but make
- 5:30them good. You’ll get retention,
- 5:32comments, and won't burn out by
- 5:34December. And this point is the only
- 5:36one on today’s list where the fear
- 5:38turned out to be true. A video got few
- 5:40views, you got upset, and deleted it so
- 5:42as not to ruin the channel's stats.
- 5:44Well, the platform confirms that
- 5:46deleting videos is genuinely harmful,
- 5:47directly and without reservations. The
- 5:49mechanics are simple. Each video on
- 5:51your channel is a separate opportunity
- 5:52for you to be found. Different videos
- 5:54can have different audiences. By
- 5:56deleting a video, you are personally
- 5:58destroying your own chances. And here
- 6:00you might say: "Alexey, but dead videos
- 6:02drag the channel down." They don't. And
- 6:04this is also a direct quote. If the
- 6:06platform realizes a video isn't landing
- 6:08, it hardly shows it to anyone anyway.
- 6:10It just sits there and doesn't bother
- 6:12anyone. Sometimes it’s even re-tested
- 6:14. Maybe its time has come. You know
- 6:15what’s funny? Subscribers regularly
- 6:17dig up the oldest, clunkiest videos on
- 6:19the channel and watch those exact ones.
- 6:21Give them that opportunity. The only
- 6:23reason to delete a video is if you are
- 6:25ashamed of it as content. Never for the
- 6:27sake of statistics. By the way, I’ll
- 6:29soon break down what the algorithm
- 6:31prioritizes in 2026. There will be a
- 6:33lot of specific data there. Subscribe
- 6:34so you don't miss it. And now we’ve
- 6:36reached the main point for which I
- 6:38asked you to watch until the end. The
- 6:41most honest fear I hear from creators
- 6:42sounds like this: "I posted a weak
- 6:44video, and now it will drag the next
- 6:46ones down: the moment is lost, the
- 6:47channel is ruined, I have to start over
- 6:49." Good news. Recommendations don't
- 6:52evaluate performance at the channel
- 6:54level at all. What matters is only how
- 6:56well each individual video resonates
- 6:58with a specific viewer. And the fact
- 7:00that a person didn't like the last
- 7:02video doesn't at all mean they won't
- 7:03like the next one. A direct quote from
- 7:05Todd. He specifically works on YouTube
- 7:07search and recommendation systems.
- 7:09There is nothing that counts your
- 7:11unsuccessful videos and says, "That's
- 7:13it, you're out." And the part about
- 7:14vacations turned out even better. Todd
- 7:16didn't just speculate; he went and did
- 7:17the math. I analyzed hundreds of
- 7:19channels that took a break for at least
- 7:212 weeks. And here is the result. There
- 7:23were more channels that returned with
- 7:25higher views than they had the week
- 7:26before their break than those that saw
- 7:28a decline. A break doesn't hurt a
- 7:30channel. Your audience will wait if
- 7:31they find you interesting. My clients
- 7:33have had similar situations when they
- 7:35went on vacation or got sick, right? I
- 7:38mean, you can't really film while
- 7:39you're sick anyway. And a bug can knock
- 7:42you out for even 2 weeks. And even
- 7:44after a certain period of stagnation,
- 7:45the content still gained traction. Yes,
- 7:48some people might have dropped off,
- 7:50thinking the channel was no longer
- 7:51active, but those are just tiny
- 7:52percentages because subscribers rarely
- 7:54ever unsubscribe. Only if you
- 7:57completely abandon the channel for like
- 7:59six months will they see it in their
- 8:01subscriptions and wonder why it's even
- 8:03there. Only then will they unsubscribe.
- 8:04There you go. Otherwise, if they are
- 8:06subscribed, your new video will be
- 8:07recommended to them regardless, and
- 8:09they'll remember you and watch it. By
- 8:11the way, there is one thing that
- 8:12matters, but it’s not the algorithm
- 8:13—it’s the people. Your viewers
- 8:14decide whether to watch the next video
- 8:16because they are thinking about the
- 8:18previous one. If a series of weak
- 8:19episodes comes out back-to-back, the
- 8:21audience quietly loses interest. Now
- 8:22that is a real problem, unlike the
- 8:24imaginary ones. So, here is some
- 8:26practical advice from the same team.
- 8:28Space out your experiments over time.
- 8:29Formats that have stopped working
- 8:31should be refreshed or dropped.
- 8:32Strengthen the ones that work and try
- 8:34new things one at a time, not all at
- 8:36once. The one thing to take away from
- 8:38all this is that the algorithm doesn't
- 8:39seek revenge. It doesn't remember your
- 8:41failures, doesn't punish you for
- 8:42vacations, and doesn't reset a video
- 8:43because of a new thumbnail. It simply
- 8:45follows your audience. And all that is
- 8:47required of you after publishing is not
- 8:49to get in its way. By the way, there is
- 8:50a free guide hidden in the description
- 8:52of this video that will serve as a
- 8:54great checklist of what not to do after
- 8:55uploading a video to YouTube. Go grab
- 8:57it. And this has been Alexey. Thanks
- 8:59for watching.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of 5 действий ПОСЛЕ публикации, которые РЕШАЮТ судьбу ролика by Куценко Алексей, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 1,934 words across 296 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to choose a caption track available on the video.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, caption language selection, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.