YT YouTube2Text

YouTube2Text → Transcripts → 2026/11/02黃智賢夜問1896集直播辯論后蔣贏氣勢沈贏支持！民調接連不利蔣！萬安警報響！/洋流大車掃週末連兩場！蔣萬安絕地反攻夫人牌接連出動！/4週不到國民黨如何救？悲情牌是最後武器！

2026/11/02黃智賢夜問1896集直播辯論后蔣贏氣勢沈贏支持！民調接連不利蔣！萬安警報響！/洋流大車掃週末連兩場！蔣萬安絕地反攻夫人牌接連出動！/4週不到國民黨如何救？悲情牌是最後武器！ — Transcript

by 黃智賢夜問 · 9,174 words · 1,555 segments · language en · Watch on YouTube

Open in transcriber Summarize with AI Download SRT/VTT

Full transcript

0:03Hello everyone, I am Huang Chih-hsien,
0:06today is Monday, November 2nd.
0:09This year's election voting day is
0:12November 28th, which is 26 days from now
0:15. That is less than four weeks away. So
0:19the election race is heating up
0:21intensely now.
0:25Alright, let's look at Saturday's debate
0:28.
0:36Because October 31st was the anniversary
0:38of Chiang Kai-shek's birth, and there
0:41was the Pride Parade that afternoon,
0:43plus Shen Po-yang finished his big
0:45debate at noon, and in the evening there
0:48was the Halloween event, everyone in
0:50Taipei went crazy,
0:57it's quite funny.
1:00There were many people who went to
1:03cosplay as cockroaches.
1:08And rats, some cosplayed as sanitation
1:11workers, and some even cosplayed as rat
1:14catchers.
1:21And there were also people who cosplayed
1:24as the [deleted] in the MRT carriage
1:26that was dismantled.
1:32I, I got a little tripped up.
1:36I think it's brilliant, I really think
1:39it's great, because Halloween is
1:41originally a ghost festival, a Western
1:44ghost festival, so if you are in the US
1:46for Halloween, many people's cosplay
1:49revolves around ghosts, but in Taiwan,
1:51playing Halloween is turned into, oh, we
1:54use this to do all kinds of cosplay to
1:57express our feelings, emotions, or
1:59whatever, it's really, really too funny
2:02.
2:04I personally don't celebrate Halloween,
2:07I never do, because I don't like it, but
2:09seeing how crazy Taiwanese people are
2:12about Halloween is just too adorable.
2:14What else?
2:17I saw a group of young people, maybe six
2:20or seven of them, cosplayed as a pack of
2:24enoki mushrooms, they cosplayed as enoki
2:27, just, just because.
2:33It was hilarious, eight people got
2:36together and became enoki mushrooms, and
2:38on the side of the road, wow, they were
2:41just like the bags of enoki mushrooms
2:43you see in the supermarket.
2:47It's like anything goes for Halloween
2:49cosplay, and you can see from it that
2:51young people—because they are all young
2:53people—there were seven or eight big
2:55cockroaches on the side of the road,
2:57which is about how there have been many
3:00cockroaches and rats in Taipei recently
3:02.
3:03And so on and so forth, so this is just
3:06what young people enjoy and like to do.
3:10They are expressing themselves and
3:12showing their concerns and feelings, so
3:15it's a lot of fun.
3:17Maybe in a couple of days, I'll put up
3:20the ones I found, it's so funny.
3:24Then let's talk about the debate first.
3:27Regarding the debate, of course, because
3:30of copyright issues, TVBS is very strict
3:33, and I don't know if I would get taken
3:35down if I played it in small clips.
3:38Chang Yu-hsuan is having a rough time.
3:41Chang Yu-hsuan live-streamed this debate
3:44, and he asked Shen Po-yang's team, "
3:46Can you authorize me to broadcast it?"
3:49Shen Po-yang's team granted
3:51authorization, but the copyright was
3:54held by TVBS.
3:56So, TVBS later filed a report, and as a
3:59result, Chang Yu-hsuan's live stream was
4:02banned by YouTube, it seems for three
4:05months.
4:08He can't live stream for three months,
4:11but that should just be live streaming.
4:15But is my volume very low?
4:20Why would it be like this?
4:26Is it any better now?
4:29Is it any better now? Oh, never mind.
4:34Let's just continue—no, no, no, no, I
4:38didn't pinch it.
4:41Because if I had pinched this, the
4:43background would hear it, and it would
4:45be really quiet.
4:47Later.
4:52But I don't know where the problem is.
4:58Where does it sound like the problem is
5:00to you?
5:01Ah.
5:06That must be a network issue because I
5:09can hear the echo fine myself.
5:14I'm already like this, and I didn't
5:16press anything here either.
5:20Look, the mic is right here. It's
5:23impossible to have pressed anything.
5:26It's blue. The blue light is on.
5:32Is this okay?
5:35Mhm. Or do you want to reconnect? Sorry
5:39about that. I apologize. While I was
5:42talking so enthusiastically, was it
5:44because I mentioned Halloween? Did it
5:46trigger some kind of realm?
5:50Then I must apologize.
5:56I really love how these kids and young
5:59people cosplay and have so much fun, and
6:02there's no malice at all.
6:05It doesn't make you feel scared; it's
6:08just...
6:11Ah.
6:15Let's reconnect then.
6:20It should be a network connection issue
6:23because our backend is fine, so it must
6:25be YouTube.
6:41Shouldn't we reconnect?
6:49Sorry, no.
7:08Hmm, so there's no problem between me
7:11and the backend here?
7:15Is there a problem from the backend to
7:18YouTube?
7:20Right?
7:22Unless I connect directly myself.
7:26But then I wouldn't be able to play the
7:28clips. Yes.
7:32No?
7:34Then...
7:40Should we continue?
7:46Let's just continue, okay?
7:53Let's just continue, because you don't
7:56know where the problem is like this, and
7:58some people hear it fine while others
8:00say the sound is very low.
8:06I'm going to keep talking. Fine. There's
8:09a lot of content today, I'm afraid I
8:11won't finish.
8:14Alright, the TVBS Poll Center actually
8:16released the latest poll Saturday night
8:19right after the debate.
8:23This is an emergency poll they conducted
8:26, mobilizing 98 interviewers to conduct
8:29telephone surveys from 2 PM to 6 PM,
8:32with 1,747 valid samples of Taipei
8:35citizens.
8:38The result is that 47%thought Chen
8:40Po-yang performed better, while 40%
8:43thought Chiang Wan-an performed better.
8:48This is quite special. Okay, why is that
8:52?
8:53Because while the debate was still
8:55ongoing—it hadn't even ended at two
8:58o'clock yet—the online battle had
9:00already begun.
9:03A massive number of Chiang Wan-an's
9:05supporter accounts came out saying how
9:08handsome Chiang was and how well he
9:10spoke, then fully attacked Chen Po-yang
9:13, claiming he was crushed; Chen's
9:15supporters also came out afterward to
9:17speak up. But I will look at this fairly
9:20and objectively. Chiang Wan-an’s
9:23momentum was extremely strong. He kept
9:26questioning Chen, blah blah blah,
9:29looking radiant and full of energy.
9:34Because before the debate, Chiang hid at
9:37home for two days, not running any
9:39public events or seeing anyone, and then
9:41his campaign managers came out and said
9:44, "Oh, he's not feeling well, he has a
9:46cold, his voice is hoarse."
9:55But once he appeared, he was full of
9:57spirit, eloquent, and his voice was
10:00excellent; actually, I thought the
10:02visual was good and his speaking was
10:04sharp and cutting, while you could see
10:07Chen Po-yang was very restrained.
10:13Before the debate, he was still doing
10:15his daily schedule for over a dozen
10:18hours. He had absolutely no rest.
10:24On the day of the debate, in situations
10:26where he could have gone for the kill,
10:28he didn't.
10:32Then he quoted Kevin Tsai's words and
10:35the Book of Rites, specifically the
10:37section on the Great Unity.
10:41When the debate started, he first asked
10:43about Chiang Wan-an's health.
10:47So you can feel that the two sides had
10:49different strategies and different
10:52attitudes. Chiang Wan-an was on the
10:55offensive. Chiang Wan-an was aggressive
10:58.
10:59Chen Po-yang was very steady; he could
11:01have attacked, but you could feel him
11:04holding back, constantly pulling in.
11:08So Chiang's supporters were very
11:10energized throughout the afternoon after
11:12the debate, backed by many accounts—I
11:14can't call them internet armies, just
11:17accounts—continuously attacking.
11:20As for Chen Po-yang's supporters, they
11:23were very nervous; they felt Chen was
11:25being bullied, they felt Chen didn't...
11:28but I will share my views on this in a
11:30moment.
11:32But the host this time was TVBS, and
11:36TVBS is very difficult.
11:38And from the TVBS poll, you can clearly
11:42see that 47%thought Chen Po-yang was
11:45better. You have to realize that TVBS
11:48has an institutional effect.
11:51Right.
11:55So, from the TVBS poll, the 47%who
11:58thought Chen Po-yang performed better is
12:01more than the 40%who thought Chiang
12:04Wan-an was better, which is interesting
12:06.
12:12While the internet can be manipulated,
12:14polls are relatively more scientific;
12:17secondly, the question was asked on
12:19Saturday, asking if the election were
12:22tomorrow on Sunday, who would you vote
12:24for?
12:28More people said they would vote for
12:31Chiang Wan-an at 46%, while only 42%
12:34said they would vote for Shen Po-yang.
12:37Chiang Wan-an leads by 4%.
12:40Note that the margin of error for this
12:43poll is under plus or minus 3%, likely
12:46around plus or minus 2 point something.
12:50So, Chiang Wan-an's 4%lead is, of course
12:54, beyond the margin of error.
12:58However, the TVBS survey on October 7th
13:01showed Chiang Wan-an winning over Shen
13:04Po-yang.
13:07Now the gap between their leads has
13:09narrowed, so while the numbers differ,
13:12the trend is consistent.
13:15Secondly, we have already discussed the
13:19TVBS institutional effect.
13:23Furthermore, it's quite funny that the
13:26cross-analysis in TVBS's own survey
13:28found that the televised debate had a
13:31significant impact on voters '
13:33intentions.
13:35This is a TVBS poll.
13:39It states that among those who watched
13:42the debate, 52%support Shen Po-yang,
13:45leading Chiang Wan-an by 4%.
13:51Among those who did not watch the debate
13:54, more support Chiang Wan-an at 54%,
13:57which is higher than Shen Po-yang's 27%
14:00.
14:05In other words, in TVBS's own survey, 52
14:08%of those who watched the debate support
14:12Shen Po-yang.
14:18This is very alarming. You have to
14:22realize, because this was conducted by
14:25TVBS, and the TVBS sample has issues.
14:29Why?
14:31Because if you cross-reference the
14:34people they asked in 2022 about voting
14:36for Chiang Wan-an, Chen Shih-chung, and
14:39Huang Shan-shan, it’s different from
14:41their current proportions.
14:45Meaning that the final sample TVBS used
14:48this time was actually biased toward
14:51Chiang Wan-an, yet the result you
14:53produced shows you only leading Shen
14:56Po-yang by 4%.
14:58Then, combined with the fact that many
15:00people decided to vote for Shen Po-yang
15:03after watching this debate, I predict
15:05there probably won't be a second debate
15:08. Now,
15:16Giving topics in advance, why did this
15:19happen?
15:24Well, the standard format for this
15:26debate is two candidates, both making
15:28opening statements; each person speaks
15:31for a segment, which can all be prepared
15:33in advance.
15:36And,
15:39For questioning, you can prepare your
15:41questions, what you want to ask the
15:43other side, what you’ll say in your
15:45closing statement, and what conclusion
15:47you want to make, which you can also
15:49prepare for yourself. So, for a
15:51candidate in this debate arena, what is
15:54it that they cannot prepare for? They
15:57don't know what topics the other side
15:59will throw out—there are two: one is
16:01what your opponent will ask you. You can
16:03certainly guess in advance, but you
16:05don't know what the other side will
16:06actually ask; they definitely won't tell
16:08you. The second thing is what the media
16:11will ask. You can't really prepare for
16:14this.
16:15In debates between candidates worldwide
16:18, media questions are crucial.
16:21You bring media professionals on-site to
16:24ask questions because they represent the
16:27"fourth estate."
16:29Even if some media lean blue, green, or
16:32otherwise, you are, after all, the media
16:35. Therefore, you should maintain a
16:38minimum level of impartiality as a third
16:41party. So, what questions should the
16:44media ask? Regardless of whether you are
16:46a blue or green-leaning outlet, you must
16:48keep them confidential beforehand; you
16:50cannot let the other side know. Because
16:53the whole point is to test the other
16:55side's ability to react on the spot.
17:00Yet, in Taiwan, no one ever thought: "
17:02Do you media outlets actually give the
17:05questions to people in advance?"
17:08As it turned out, during the debate that
17:11day, Chiang Wan-an kept his head down
17:14reading from a script. It would be one
17:17thing to read your own opening statement
17:20, but even after the media questions, he
17:23kept reading, just kept reading.
17:25Everyone found it very strange.
17:28Someone wrote on Threads that they
17:31dreamt the media had leaked the
17:33questions.
17:35When asked, Shen Po-yang replied: "Yes,
17:38they gave the questions in advance, but
17:41I don't know why." Eventually, TVBS
17:44executives admitted that the questions
17:47were provided in advance. Then Lo
17:49Chih-chiang posted, mocking Sanlih and
17:52Wu Szu-yao, saying: "Providing the
17:55questions in advance was agreed upon by
17:58TVBS and Sanlih. Wu was there and agreed
18:01, so what are you doing now?"
18:06Then a TVBS executive said, "Oh, we gave
18:08the questions in advance four years ago
18:11too." But then other media figures, like
18:14the editor-in-chief of the Liberty Times
18:17, Chou Ching, said he has served as a
18:19media questioner in many elections
18:22before. He said that the organizers have
18:24never had such a situation.
18:27He added that the press considers
18:29leaking questions a strictly forbidden
18:32taboo.
18:35So now it has become a Rashomon-style
18:38mystery: should media questions be
18:41provided in advance or not?
18:47I think it's quite laughable.
18:54Now, let's take a look at a second poll
18:56, which is the latest one released this
18:59morning.
19:04This was commissioned by the Taiwan
19:07Promotion Association and conducted by
19:11the AI Polling Center using AI-automated
19:14telephone interviews, with a sample of
19:181,436 people: 884 via landline and 552
19:21via mobile.
19:25The survey was conducted from 9:00 AM to
19:295:54 PM on November 1st, with a 95%
19:31confidence level and a maximum sampling
19:35error of plus or minus 2.6%.
19:38You see, what makes this poll different
19:41is that it uses AI to make the calls. It
19:44isn't using actual people to make the
19:46calls. It uses an AI voice to conduct
19:49the calls. Well, for one thing, it's
19:52less spontaneous, but for another, it
19:54can control the emotional tone of human
19:57operators that might otherwise cause
19:59influence, but I think the most
20:01important thing is what? The most
20:03important thing is that AI is cheaper,
20:05because if you use real people, you have
20:08to hire so many of them. Then what is
20:10another difference?
20:13Your valid sample size is 1,436, with
20:17only 884 landline calls and 552 mobile
20:22calls.
20:26We all know that the people who answer
20:28landline phones these days are generally
20:31older.
20:40Mobile phones, on the other hand, could
20:42be answered by older or younger people,
20:45so if your poll was entirely landlines,
20:47the people answering would almost
20:49certainly be elderly, which would lead
20:51to different results.
20:59You have to realize that this poll
21:01includes a large number of mobile phone
21:04users, so you know it will reach many
21:06younger people.
21:09He mentioned today that the post-debate
21:12poll results show 41.2%of Taipei
21:15citizens think Chen Bo-yang performed
21:18better, while 26.3%think Chiang Wan-an
21:21did better.
21:26Wow, this number of people who think
21:28Chen Bo-yang performed better is much
21:31higher than the TVBS poll, you see,
21:33really.
21:38Of course, I think it's also possible
21:40that Chen Bo-yang has more supporters,
21:42because if you are a Chen Bo-yang
21:44supporter, you might be biased and think
21:47that Chen Bo-yang is more generous and
21:49has a broader vision.
21:52It could also be Chiang Wan-an. Because
21:55he was being aggressive. His fierce
21:58momentum might actually make him
22:00unappealing to the general public,
22:02because that's just how you are. If you
22:05are a die-hard, deep-blue Chiang Wan-an
22:09supporter.
22:11Seeing Chiang Wan-an being so aggressive
22:14and sharp in the debate, regardless of
22:16whether he has a point or not.
22:22You might feel satisfied, and of course
22:24Chen's supporters wouldn't be happy, but
22:27moderate voters who aren't necessarily
22:30fond of Chen or Chiang might think, "
22:33Hmm, you're running for mayor, is this
22:35really okay?"
22:39He's the challenger, why don't you look
22:42like a mayor?
22:43Do you understand?
22:46This is why I think Chen Bo-yang in the
22:48debate...
22:53His strategy is, if there's a shot to
22:55take, I'll take it, but I'll just stop
22:58at the right point.
23:03Because I think Chen Bo-yang's TA for
23:06this debate, that is, the target
23:08audience he set, is the moderate voters
23:11and...
23:17Because if a moderate voter was already
23:19a supporter of Chen Bo-yang, they
23:21wouldn't be called a "moderate voter"
23:23anymore.
23:26"Light-blue" just means they haven't
23:28said they support Chen Bo-yang yet.
23:38So he used a non-aggressive approach, a
23:41very restrained, low-key, gentle, and
23:44rational image, which made people who
23:47might not have strong political or
23:49partisan leanings think, "Hmm,
23:59you look more like a mayor.
24:03" Second, for light blue or even
24:05moderate, middle-of-the-road voters—
24:08those between light blue and deep blue.
24:15When they were hesitating or resisting,
24:18they thought Shen Bo-yang was scary, but
24:21it turned out he didn't want to wipe
24:23them out, so I think this is Shen
24:26Bo-yang's...
24:32And in this poll, Shen Bo-yang's
24:35approval rating is 38.4%. The
24:39disapproval rating has already reached
24:4248.3%.
24:44Assuming this poll is quite accurate,
24:47Chiang Wan-an is truly in a very
24:49dangerous position, entering the "death
24:52zone.
24:56" What's even more terrifying is that in
25:00this poll, Shen Bo-yang's supporters
25:03have exceeded 50%, with 52.6%supporting
25:06Shen, while Chiang Wan-an has only 35.3
25:09%.
25:12This isn't about whether you debated
25:15well; only 41.2%thought Shen Bo-yang
25:17debated well, but those who want to
25:20support Shen Bo-yang...
25:25This 52.6%plus Chiang Wan-an's 35.3%is
25:32already 85.9%, almost 86%.
25:37This, of course, is for Chiang Wan-an a
25:41...
25:45In it, they also asked, "Which issues do
25:48you think the next mayor should
25:50prioritize?
25:52" What's the number one priority?
25:56Urban renewal accounts for 24.3%,
25:59followed by traffic, then environmental
26:03hygiene at 12%, education at 11.9%,
26:07long-term care and medical services at
26:109.7%, housing prices and living
26:14conditions at 7.5%, and public safety at
26:176.4%.
26:20So urban renewal is at 24.3%. Now let's
26:25look back at this. Looking at the urban
26:28renewal strategy, Chiang Wan-an—as the
26:31outgoing mayor—used a very granular
26:33question, asking, "Do you know about
26:36this or that issue regarding urban
26:38renewal?
26:40" Since Shen is the challenger, of
26:43course he didn't know, so in the debate
26:45, some people asked, "Chiang Wan-an has
26:48the advantage; look how prepared and
26:50experienced he is.
26:53" On the issue of urban renewal, Shen
26:56Bo-yang said, "The key to renewal is
26:58companionship, but most importantly,
27:01it's about starting, breaking ground,
27:03and completing the projects.
27:08" These two sentences were constantly
27:11mocked by blue camp supporters online,
27:13and even blue camp politicians used this
27:16as a meme to make fun of him. "
27:20Haha, how low-level, how stupid, what's
27:23this' companionship 'thing?" They even
27:26used this at rallies to mock Shen
27:29Bo-yang.
27:32But this is actually a bit silly.
27:35Why? Because the idea that the key to
27:39urban renewal lies in companionship is
27:42correct both rationally and emotionally
27:45. Because urban renewal is companionship
27:49.
27:49Chiang Wan-an has talked about urban
27:52renewal support himself, and the Taipei
27:54City Government also emphasizes this
27:56support when discussing urban renewal.
28:00This is professional. Because urban
28:03renewal involves a great number of
28:06administrative processes and various
28:08legal coordinations. What do you mean
28:11when you talk about "urban renewal"? Say
28:14you have a building with 100 households
28:17. Okay.
28:19This building is 40 or over 40 years old
28:22; it’s an old building.
28:25Furthermore, in the early days, building
28:28codes were less strict, so they might
28:31have been built more crudely.
28:34Secondly, it might lack parking spaces
28:37or elevators, and it’s likely only four
28:40or five stories tall.
28:44So, even if this building could last
28:46another 70 or 80 years, the residents
28:49have needs for elevators and parking, so
28:52they want to renew it.
28:56The question is, with these 100
28:59households, how do we renew it? You
29:02might think it's easy: just tear the
29:04building down and build a new one. But
29:06how many laws does that involve? So,
29:09typically, you find a developer for
29:11urban renewal, and the developer wants
29:14to make a profit. That’s why there are
29:16so many horror stories about urban
29:18renewal. And urban renewal? I’ve heard
29:22from friends about their urban renewal,
29:24what their families go through. From the
29:26moment they decide on urban renewal to
29:29the final completion and moving into the
29:31new home. There are many cases that take
29:3420 years from start to finish. Some
29:36people have waited 20 or 30 years and
29:38still haven't seen urban renewal happen
29:40. They wait until their parents pass
29:42away, the elderly parents are all gone,
29:45and the house still isn't done. They run
29:47into all sorts of difficult problems and
29:49can't find anyone to help, so they turn
29:51to city councilors, which is very
29:52painful. That’s why urban renewal
29:55support exists. This issue here. Shen
29:58Pao-yang is very smart; when he was
30:00speaking about this. After he spoke, I
30:03saw many people online who are
30:05personally involved in urban renewal
30:07cases speaking up themselves. Second,
30:10Shen said the most important things are
30:12the start of construction and the
30:14completion of construction.
30:16Those who don't understand urban renewal
30:19might think, "What kind of joke are you
30:21telling?""Oh, starting and finishing
30:23construction? Isn't that obvious? What's
30:25there to talk about?" Wrong. Once you
30:28run the urban renewal process and
30:29finally reach the start of construction
30:31, you can finally breathe a sigh of
30:32relief. Normally, if we buy a new house
30:34, two, three, or four years after
30:36construction starts, it should be
30:38finished, right? But with urban renewal
30:40, you’re terrified that the developer
30:42might run away halfway through, so
30:44you’re on edge until it’s finished.
30:47Also, with urban renewal, you have to
30:50move out, and this place has to be torn
30:53down and rebuilt.
30:54When you rent a place, when you move out
30:57, what about your rent and your life?
31:02That's why the three keywords—guidance,
31:05groundbreaking, and completion—are so
31:07significant to people whose homes are
31:10undergoing urban renewal.
31:14Look back at the TVBS poll and the other
31:17one I mentioned.
31:22Many people think that in terms of the
31:24debate, Chiang won, so why do the polls
31:27show Chen leading?
31:33Sure, you can talk about the polls, but
31:36I'm telling you, it's because you could
31:38say Chen is very shrewd.
31:41He’s not actually competing with you in
31:44the debate. He is using the debate stage
31:47. This setting where he appears
31:49alongside Chiang.
31:51He wants to persuade and tell the public
31:54, tell the people.
31:57Please trust me. I understand you. I
32:00will stand with you. Don't be afraid of
32:04me. You know what I mean? He's doing
32:07this while Chiang Wan-an says, "I'll
32:09help you, I'll provide for you," but
32:12Chen is saying, "Look at me." I speak
32:15like a mayor. I have the stature of a
32:18mayor. So please vote for me. These two
32:22have completely different strategies.
32:24But I want to remind Chen. The key to
32:28urban renewal isn't just guidance,
32:30groundbreaking, and completion; even
32:32more important is the distribution of
32:35benefits. Whenever urban renewal stalls
32:37, it's due to uneven distribution.
32:40Developers want to make more money. If
32:42they make more, the original residents
32:45get fleeced. There are also conflicts
32:48among the residents themselves. For
32:51example, I'm used to living on the
32:53second floor; it's comfortable and
32:55convenient.
32:57So after the renewal, I still want to
33:00live on the second floor, right?
33:03Also, think about how valuable the
33:05original storefronts are; the older the
33:08building, the more valuable the
33:10storefront. Do you know why? An old
33:13building means an important commercial
33:15district has already formed nearby. The
33:18rent for that storefront might be
33:20hundreds of thousands a month. Or they
33:23might be running their own business
33:25there. They could be making millions a
33:27month, so if I move out for urban
33:29renewal and come back in four years, I
33:31can't operate during those four years.
33:34I'd lose tens or hundreds of millions.
33:37What am I supposed to do? Even if I
33:40return, will my customers still come
33:43back?
33:43That's why urban renewal often gets
33:46stuck: residents upstairs want it for
33:49the elevators and parking, but the
33:51ground-floor shops don't.
33:54So, there is an uneven distribution of
33:56benefits between the residents.
33:59Furthermore, I live in an apartment now
34:03, 30 pings, because the common area was
34:06small back then, maybe only 10%or 15%,
34:10but now common areas are 30%to over 30%
34:14. So the residents say, "I still want a
34:16one-to-one swap; I live in 30 pings now
34:18, and when the new building is built, I
34:21still want that, so where will the
34:23elevator space come from?" Next. Oh, and
34:26I also need a parking space; if there's
34:29no parking space, then why should I
34:31agree to the urban renewal?
34:33So the residents' expectations and
34:35demands are a one-to-one swap with a
34:38parking space, but where will that extra
34:41required floor space come from?
34:44And if it takes four years to build,
34:47that's 48 months, and Taipei rent is
34:50expensive, so where am I supposed to
34:52rent a place for 48 months? Can you
34:56cover all of my rent money? This is
34:58where the trouble with urban renewal
35:00lies; the key to urban renewal is the
35:02distribution of benefits. It's hard to
35:04satisfy everyone, as each person wants
35:06something different. Right.
35:14Some media commentators say that given
35:16the current situation, Shen Po-yang and
35:19the DPP are low-key about the polls
35:21because they might have the advantage
35:23but don't want to say it, while the
35:26Chiang camp and the KMT might be at a
35:28disadvantage and also don't want to talk
35:31about it.
35:34So both the winners and the losers don't
35:37want to talk, leading to this eerie,
35:40strange state. But because the KMT
35:43originally had a large rally scheduled
35:46for November 8th, it has now been
35:48canceled.
35:50So commentator Wu Kun-yu, Brother Wu,
35:53asked why this is happening. It can be
35:56viewed from two points.
35:59First, you have to mobilize, you have to
36:02hold a rally, you need people.
36:07But for that rally at Dunhua Junior High
36:10, that mobilization—you booked the
36:12school, set up a stage, brought people
36:15in by bus—you spent millions, maybe ten
36:18million, how much money did you spend?
36:21And how many people did you actually
36:24mobilize? A few thousand. Of course, you
36:27can claim 50,000 people, but everyone
36:29knows how many people can actually fit
36:31in the Dunhua Junior High playground.
36:33And second, if the momentum isn't good,
36:35when you try to mobilize a lot of people
36:37, many local organizers will feel, "Oh,
36:39this is a hassle." So if you can't turn
36:41people out, it doesn't look good. And if
36:43you try to compete with Shen Po-yang's
36:46events. You can't keep up. October 31st
36:50. In the Zhongzheng-Wanhua area, there
36:52was a campaign vehicle parade.
36:54Zhongzheng District leans blue, Wanhua
36:57leans green, and finally at Longshan
36:59Temple, if you look at the aerial
37:01footage. You can see the streets crowded
37:04.
37:08When you see the emotions of the people
37:10standing on the roadside during the
37:12vehicle parade, I believe every camp is
37:15watching that.
37:19That kind of enthusiasm is something the
37:21Blue camp doesn't have right now.
37:25Then on Sunday, November 1st, it was
37:28Daan and Wenshan, which are very deep
37:31Blue.
37:33But look, he drove for three hours,
37:36through Daan District, into Wenshan
37:38District, reaching Muzha, and then
37:41looped back to Daan Forest Park. Oh, you
37:44look at those aerial shots, the number
37:47of people on-site was probably even
37:49higher than the day before.
37:52If the KMT wants to hold a rally, can
37:54you match that same momentum and that
37:57same turnout?
37:59The online livestream had over 100,000
38:02viewers, so if you can't compare to that
38:05, you'll look bad.
38:07The second factor is money; you have to
38:10spend money to mobilize for rallies.
38:13Many of Shen Boyang's events you see are
38:15not mobilized, but for KMT events, you
38:18need tour buses and all sorts of things
38:21, so you have to spend that money. Last
38:23year, the KMT spent a lot of money in
38:26Daan, and then on July 25th of this year
38:29, they suddenly held another rally and
38:32mobilized, costing at least tens of
38:35millions. So if you spend money now and
38:38can't turn people out, isn't that a lack
38:41of intelligence?
38:43It would be better to save those
38:45resources and energy to spend right
38:47before the election.
38:49So it might be like this, and media
38:51figures have come out to reveal, what
38:54exactly is the Chiang camp's goal? Why
38:57is the Chiang camp's current strategy
39:00focused entirely on their core deep-Blue
39:03base? You can clearly see that they are
39:05not trying to expand outward; their
39:07appeal isn't directed at
39:09middle-of-the-road voters, or even
39:11light-Green voters. Shen Boyang is
39:13targeting middle-of-the-road voters and
39:15the Green base. Ideally, Chiang Wan-an
39:17should also be targeting
39:19middle-of-the-road and light-Green
39:21voters, but he isn't; he's constantly
39:24guarding his own core base.
39:27And the harder you guard your core base
39:30, the more likely you are to lose
39:32middle-of-the-road voters.
39:37Let's take a look, including the Pride
39:40Parade; Chiang Wan-an went, and Boyang
39:43also went, but Chiang left after only 15
39:45minutes.
39:47And Chiang Wan-an now keeps talking
39:49about Nvidia, the Taipei Dome, and fresh
39:52milk—Nvidia, milk, and the Taipei Dome,
39:54right? Come on. He says it at every
39:57event he goes to; that's what Chiang
39:58Wan-an talked about at three events
40:00yesterday. He talks about it at every
40:02event he attends to help city councilors
40:04, so let's take a listen.
40:06>> We completed the opening of the Taipei
40:08Dome, allowing us to host baseball games
40:11and concerts.
40:13Everyone doesn't have to go abroad to
40:15see performances; we have completed our
40:18efforts to bring Nvidia to settle in the
40:20Beitou-Shilin Technology Park, right?
40:22>> Right.
40:23>> Thousands of job opportunities, and
40:26laying the foundation for Taipei's AI
40:28technology development in the future.
40:30>> I think, whether it's the smooth
40:32completion of the Taipei Dome, hosting
40:35baseball games, officially holding
40:37concerts, and welcoming many superstars
40:40to Taipei.
40:44Overcoming various difficulties, beating
40:47many international cities, and also
40:49winning over many counties and cities in
40:52Taiwan, we finally solved the land
40:55rights issue, allowing NVIDIA to
40:57successfully settle in Taipei. Pushing
40:59for many major constructions; on one
41:02hand, speaking of the Taipei Dome, I
41:04have even deeper expectations for it.
41:07After we completed and opened it to host
41:08baseball games, I want to report to you
41:10that the Taiwan Series has been held at
41:12the Taipei Dome for three consecutive
41:13years, and we have welcomed over 4
41:15million spectators. Of course, what's
41:17more important is the concern over
41:18holding concerts. With the city
41:20government team, we overcame various
41:22challenges, including engineering,
41:23safety, and fire prevention, so we made
41:25a breakthrough; now we can hold concerts
41:27, and everyone can see superstars from
41:29around the world without going abroad,
41:30right? With difficulty, NVIDIA
41:32successfully settled in Taipei. Is
41:35everyone happy?
41:36>> We not only won the international
41:37competition, beating major global cities
41:39, but we also outperformed other cities
41:41in Taiwan. Most importantly, at the very
41:43last moment, we overcame and resolved
41:44the land rights issue, which allowed
41:46NVIDIA to successfully settle in the
41:47Beitou-Shilin Technology Park. So, for
41:49our future with tens of thousands of
41:51high-paying jobs and at least 40 billion
41:53in investment, we are putting Taipei at
41:55the forefront of technological
41:56development and leading the continuous
41:58growth of Taipei's tech industry.
42:04This.
42:09The Taipei Dome was promoted when Ma
42:11Ying-jeou was mayor because people in
42:13Taiwan kept asking why there wasn't an
42:16indoor dome for playing baseball.
42:21We only had outdoor fields that were
42:23affected by the weather. So Taipei had
42:25to find a piece of land for the Dome,
42:28and it was originally intended to be in
42:30Guandu. However, the Taipei City
42:32Government later decided that Guandu was
42:34too remote, even though it is still in
42:36Taipei City. They wanted to place it in
42:38the city center; is this decision right
42:40or wrong? I don't know. I personally
42:43think it should have been in Guandu.
42:46Because the Dome is too central.
42:50Secondly, I do not approve of Ma
42:52Ying-jeou's approach. I believe the
42:55Taipei Dome should have been built by
42:57Taipei City itself. After building it,
42:59you could outsource the management to
43:01others, check every year how well the
43:04contractor is doing, and since you
43:06retain ownership at all times, you can
43:08take it back if needed.
43:11Sorry, Ma Ying-jeou made a decision back
43:14then that I consider a mistake.
43:21He took the Taipei Dome site, located in
43:23the prime, diamond-tier district of the
43:26city—the most valuable piece of public
43:29land in Taipei—and put it up for a BOT
43:32tender.
43:38He told the winning developer, "Here’s
43:41the land, go build the dome, and you get
43:43all the operating rights for 40 or 50
43:46years.
43:49" And Taipei City lost all operational
43:52control. But the truth is, the land
43:54itself is the most valuable part, not
43:57just building a dome. The construction
43:59costs weren't as high as the value of
44:01the land. Taipei City wasn't poor or
44:04short on funds, so why? Why not just
44:06fund it yourself? That’s why I have
44:08serious doubts about Ma Ying-jeou
44:10regarding this matter. However, it was
44:12still Ma Ying-jeou who made the final
44:14decision and had the audacity to build
44:16the Taipei Dome. We must be fair when
44:19weighing merits and faults. Ma Ying-jeou
44:21does deserve credit for initiating the
44:24Taipei Dome. But he didn't build it
44:27himself. You handed over 40 to 50 years
44:30of operating rights to Farglory—that was
44:34a fault. And furthermore, there was an
44:37issue with the contract.
44:41You gave so many concessions to Farglory
44:44that they hardly had to share any
44:46profits with Taipei City; is that
44:48reasonable?
44:54That’s why the Taipei City Finance
44:56Commissioner at the time, Lee Shu-te,
44:59was indicted for graft and even
45:01sentenced to nine years in the first
45:03trial.
45:06So, one merit and two faults for Ma
45:09Ying-jeou.
45:12Now, Farglory’s Taipei Dome hosts
45:15baseball games and concerts, and they
45:17were allowed to build office buildings
45:20on the side.
45:23Office towers, hotels, and all the rest
45:26—Farglory takes all those profits. It
45:29was all awarded as an incentive for them
45:32.
45:34If you do the math, the value of the
45:37land far exceeds Farglory’s construction
45:41costs, yet 99.9%—or maybe 95%—of the
45:45Taipei Dome’s profits go to Farglory.
45:51What did the Taipei City Government get
45:54? This is what people are questioning.
45:56But Ma Ying-jeou still deserves some
45:58credit. Later, it passed to Hau Lung-bin
46:01, and Hau had a miserable time. Because
46:04he wasn't the one who signed that
46:06contract. Then Ko Wen-je took over and
46:08kept criticizing it, calling the Taipei
46:10Dome a corrupt case, one of the "five
46:13major corrupt cases." After Ko Wen-je
46:15took office, he initially ordered
46:17Farglory to stop construction. Then,
46:20inexplicably, it resumed, and eventually
46:24it reached Chiang Wan-an.
46:27Politics really is a relay race; you
46:30shouldn't claim everyone else's work as
46:33your own. This goes back to Ma Ying-jeou
46:35and Hau Lung-bin. Even if Ko Wen-je was
46:37terrible, he at least oversaw the
46:39construction and subsequent stoppages.
46:40But now look at the roof of the Taipei
46:42Dome leaking. And the rats in the Taipei
46:44Dome. What do you have to say about this
46:47? City administration—many of the basic
46:50ABCs of city governance.
46:56Last week, I promised everyone that
46:58because at the Taipei Design Awards
47:01ceremony at the Grand Hyatt, the video—
47:03that Taipei Design Awards video—
47:06actually used non-copyrighted audio,
47:08which is why you heard that "
47:10AudioJungle, AudioJungle" AI voice.
47:16Let's take a listen. Back then, wait,
47:19wait, when he was criticized, he just
47:21said, "Oh, that was the vendor's
47:23oversight because they were testing it
47:26in the morning," and so on. But then it
47:29was revealed that, actually, no. You did
47:31the same thing in 2025, using the same
47:33tape without paying for the rights. Why
47:35did you do it for two years in a row?
47:37What are you playing at? This is a basic
47:41SOP. How could you mess up something so
47:44fundamental? Let's take a listen:
47:47AudioJungle.
47:50J
48:15And well, look at that, two years in a
48:18row.
48:20How could you make the same mistake two
48:23years in a row? Now, let's hear what the
48:25Commissioner of the Department of
48:26Economic Development has to say. He came
48:28out to speak for the vendor. First, he
48:31shifted the blame, saying it was the
48:33vendor's fault, and then he immediately
48:35started defending them. He didn't hold
48:37the vendor accountable at all. Two years
48:39in a row, mind you. Let's hear what he
48:42says.
48:43Because when they were fine-tuning the
48:45video in the morning, they downloaded
48:47the trial version.
48:50The audio file that played was the trial
48:53version, not the full version that had
48:55the copyright fees paid.
48:58We have requested that the vendor
49:00conduct an immediate review.
49:03That should be—you simply cannot have
49:06this happen.
49:10No normal person can understand how this
49:13could occur, let alone happen
49:15consecutively.
49:18Then, as the competent authority, the
49:21Taipei City Government's Department of
49:23Economic Development, you are the ones
49:26who issued the contract. Yet, you are so
49:29protective of the vendor, rushing to
49:31make excuses for them. First, you failed
49:34to supervise properly; second, you
49:37condoned it; third, you even went on to
49:40defend them. What is this? This is
49:43absolutely disgraceful. The Taipei
49:47Design Awards. For those of you who work
49:49in original content and design, what is
49:52it that you hate the most? It's when
49:54people don't respect your copyright. Yet
49:56, you've spent two consecutive years
49:58stealing and using non-copyrighted
50:01tracks. How can you claim to have any
50:03respect?
50:06Second, during the debate, the mayor
50:09talked about issues like child abuse,
50:12about how he does this and that, and how
50:14he supposedly protects children.
50:20And that he met with the parents right
50:22away.
50:29I also met with the parents at the City
50:31Council, but the truth is, Mayor Chiang
50:33was there to be questioned, and he was
50:36cornered by the parents on the way, so
50:38he had no choice but to meet them.
50:45Everyone remembers the Kai-kai case.
50:50After it happened, the Taipei City
50:52Council originally proposed to hold a
50:55briefing, requiring the Mayor to attend
50:57and report on how it was handled and to
51:00be questioned by councilors.
51:05However, the KMT chapter chair at the
51:08time, Huang Chin-ju, issued a party
51:10disciplinary order forbidding KMT
51:12councilors from attending the meeting,
51:15threatening them with disciplinary
51:17action or denying them future
51:19nominations if they dared to show up.
51:23As a result, there was a lack of quorum
51:26, because the DPP councilors did not
51:28hold a majority in the Council. Without
51:30a majority, of course, the session
51:33couldn't proceed.
51:34So, in the end, the meeting fell through
51:37.
51:39After the meeting was declared adjourned
51:42by Speaker Tai Hsi, it was turned into a
51:44discussion session.
51:48A discussion session just means
51:50councilors can come out to talk, but the
51:52Mayor doesn't have to be questioned or
51:55face scrutiny.
51:58Only after it became a discussion
52:00session did Huang Chin-ju allow KMT
52:03councilors to enter the Council chamber
52:05.
52:09So, did the Taipei City Government hold
52:12any internal meetings regarding the
52:14Kai-kai case?
52:17They did.
52:19But. The Mayor said.
52:36No. Another thing about Kai-kai is that
52:39Kai-kai represents the very bottom of
52:42our society.
52:52If.
52:56If our government needs to protect the
52:59people, those most in need of protection
53:02are people like Kai-kai.
53:10But clearly, for many people, the
53:12interests of politicians and political
53:15parties outweigh the interests of the
53:18people; if anything is unfavorable to
53:20these politicians or parties, then.
53:26A single human life cannot be reviewed.
53:30Because you are reviewing it within the
53:33City Council. It’s not about messing
53:36around online, and it’s not about
53:39sensationalist headlines, no.
53:42It is about where the process of the
53:45City Government went wrong, reviewing it
53:47with sincerity; no one is targeting any
53:50specific party, we are talking about
53:52this poor little baby, Kai-kai.
53:58Even though we couldn't save him in time
54:00, we must prevent a second Kai-kai from
54:03appearing in the future.
54:07And nothing.
54:09It just faded away.
54:13Then, later, many cases of child abuse
54:15in kindergartens occurred, and the City
54:18Government would not meet with the
54:20parents.
54:21The Mayor would not meet with the
54:23parents, yet during the debate, the
54:25Mayor even boasted, bringing it up to
54:27brag about how well he handled the child
54:29abuse cases and how he supposedly met
54:31with the parents immediately.
54:36I am not criticizing now; I am analyzing
54:39why, in terms of debate skills, Chiang
54:42Wan-an seemed to have the upper hand,
54:44yet why did the citizens who watched the
54:47debate think Shen Po-yang performed
54:49better?
54:54Next, Po-yang Lin.
55:02They claimed the city government
55:04collected bio-evidence immediately,
55:06ensuring Polam couldn't escape and
55:08families would be compensated.
55:13Do you remember the Polam incident?
55:16It was in a bustling, high-end
55:18department store food court in Taipei's
55:21Xinyi District, not some street stall.
55:25Oh.
55:33The food safety incident at Polam Tea
55:36Room caused six deaths and 29 illnesses
55:39; people just ate a plate of kway teow
55:42and died.
55:47Yet the mayor came out saying, "We
55:50collected bio-evidence immediately," but
55:53the truth is...
55:57The Control Yuan investigated the matter
56:00. The Control Yuan issued a reprimand to
56:02the Taipei City Government. See? This is
56:05why they want to abolish the Control
56:08Yuan. Because they were reprimanded by
56:11them.
56:15The reprimand stated that the Taipei
56:17City Government received reports on
56:20March 24th and knew patients were
56:22already ill.
56:26They were hospitalized.
56:28Yet they failed to initiate a preventive
56:31removal of items immediately. They
56:34didn't seal the food ingredients.
56:37Two things here.
56:40They did collect evidence.
56:46But they didn't do a preventive
56:48withdrawal of ingredients nor seal them
56:51.
56:55And the inspectors didn't arrive until
56:58the evening.
57:00Patients were already hospitalized, yet
57:03inspectors didn't show up until the
57:05evening.
57:08This led to eight more unsuspecting
57:10members of the public eating there that
57:13day and getting poisoned.
57:16People were already in the hospital, yet
57:19they let others continue, and the city
57:21knew—if they hadn't known, they might be
57:24excused. And then you go to collect
57:27evidence.
57:28You missed the key evidence because you
57:31didn't seal the ingredients.
57:35So the sampling was flawed.
57:43Then...
57:46Finally, the Ministry of Health and
57:49Welfare went in to collect evidence
57:51three days later on the 27th.
57:55Of course, they eventually tested
57:57positive for bongkrek acid on the chef's
58:00hands.
58:01But the chef's hands didn't just appear
58:04out of nowhere.
58:07They didn't know which ingredient was
58:09the problem—whether it was the kway teow
58:12, the wood ear mushrooms, or what, they
58:15didn't know.
58:18So your city government handled it
58:20poorly, you were reprimanded by the
58:23Control Yuan, yet you still boast about
58:26yourself.
58:30The second point is even more ridiculous
58:33; you see his confident, 100-point
58:36speech, saying, "I ensured Polam
58:38couldn't escape and families could get
58:41compensation.
58:47" But that is a lie.
58:51Lying from start to finish.
58:55Because you let Polam escape.
59:07You didn't move early to freeze Polam's
59:10assets, you let them divest, you let
59:13them escape, and what happened?
59:22Among the six who died, a close friend
59:25of a victim was furious and devastated.
59:29They posted online saying Polam had long
59:32since divested their assets and didn't
59:34pay a single cent.
59:37The compensation the families received
59:40was paid by others, not Polam; Polam
59:42didn't pay a dime.
59:48A friend of a victim said that his
59:50kindest classmate unfortunately passed
59:53away in this food safety incident, and
59:55after watching the debate, he felt
59:58extremely angry and indignant.
1:00:02He said that after the incident, Polam
1:00:05had already transferred their assets.
1:00:07Compulsory liability insurance, because
1:00:10you operate a restaurant.
1:00:15You are required to have compulsory
1:00:17liability insurance, yet Polam's policy
1:00:20had expired and wasn't renewed.
1:00:26The Taipei City Government had no grasp
1:00:29of the situation beforehand, made no
1:00:32demands, and failed to supervise
1:00:34properly.
1:00:38So, the families of the victims did not
1:00:41receive a single cent from the
1:00:43perpetrator, but the families of the six
1:00:45people who unfortunately passed away did
1:00:48receive compensation—where did that come
1:00:51from?
1:00:55The first sum came from the department
1:00:57store where the food court is located,
1:00:59which is Far Eastern Department Store.
1:01:06As a department store, they had property
1:01:08insurance, so through private mediation
1:01:11, they reached a settlement and paid a
1:01:13private settlement fee.
1:01:20It was paid by the department store's
1:01:22insurance company.
1:01:25Polam's shop had let its insurance
1:01:28expire.
1:01:29They transferred their own assets and
1:01:31didn't pay a single cent.
1:01:34The second sum the families received
1:01:36came from the central government.
1:01:40The central government has a budget for
1:01:42this.
1:01:43It’s called the Association for Victims
1:01:46of Crime.
1:01:48Under the national mechanism, they
1:01:50issued crime victim compensation funds.
1:01:54This is because they treated this food
1:01:56safety issue as a criminal case.
1:02:00They used these funds to pay them.
1:02:04Wait, I don't know—what if it turns out
1:02:07later that this isn't a criminal case?
1:02:11I’m sorry, I don't know.
1:02:15Regardless, the first sum was from the
1:02:17department store, and the second was the
1:02:20victim compensation fund.
1:02:22So, as this friend said, one part came
1:02:24from the private sector, one from the
1:02:27state, and absolutely nothing was paid
1:02:29by Polam. So he is very, very
1:02:36Alright, there’s more to discuss, so
1:02:38we’ll continue tomorrow, but I’d like to
1:02:41play something. Didn't we just talk
1:02:44about NVIDIA?
1:02:45They keep talking about NVIDIA, saying "
1:02:48we kept NVIDIA in Taipei," but NVIDIA
1:02:51already had a company with 2,000 people
1:02:54in Nangang, Taipei.
1:02:57NVIDIA was looking for a larger plot of
1:02:59land to build their headquarters, and
1:03:01they wanted to be in Taipei from the
1:03:03very beginning. It’s not that you kept
1:03:06NVIDIA in Taipei. The key to that land
1:03:09is Shin Kong Life Insurance. It’s
1:03:12because of Ko Wen-je.
1:03:14He sold that land at a low price to Shin
1:03:17Kong Life; in the end, the central
1:03:19government and tech moguls all went to
1:03:22persuade them, and the Taiwanese public
1:03:24was furious, thinking if they blocked
1:03:27the land and kept NVIDIA from staying,
1:03:29everyone would hold them accountable, so
1:03:32finally, Shin Kong let it go. Yet you
1:03:34keep insisting it’s your achievement.
1:03:38They even claim that you and your spouse
1:03:40know engineers at NVIDIA and went to
1:03:43find Jensen Huang.
1:03:45Why was there originally a 2,000-person
1:03:49NVIDIA office in Nangang, Taipei? Why?
1:03:54Because the government used billions
1:03:56from the Forward-looking Infrastructure
1:03:59Development Program to subsidize NVIDIA
1:04:01and lure them here to set up offices.
1:04:07This credit doesn't belong to Taipei
1:04:09City; from the very beginning, when
1:04:12NVIDIA came to Taipei, the credit wasn't
1:04:15Taipei's.
1:04:17It was the Ministry of Economic Affairs
1:04:20.
1:04:22It was central government funding that
1:04:24provided the subsidies.
1:04:27And what happened? Lee Si-chuan even
1:04:30went to New Taipei City. He said, "Oh,
1:04:33don't be angry, I will also bring NVIDIA
1:04:37to Luzhou." Is NVIDIA a 7-Eleven or a
1:04:41Costco?
1:04:46Why would NVIDIA want to go to...
1:05:00Bring NVIDIA to Luzhou?
1:05:09Honestly, if we speak frankly, this
1:05:11won't benefit Lee Si-chuan's election,
1:05:14because you need to understand what the
1:05:16people of Luzhou actually care about
1:05:19right now.
1:05:22His saying this only shows that he
1:05:24doesn't understand at all what the
1:05:26people of Luzhou want. He really needs
1:05:28to hurry up and propose policies that
1:05:30resonate with the people of Luzhou,
1:05:32policies that make them feel something.
1:05:34What you're saying now is meaningless.
1:05:37NVIDIA in Taipei isn't your achievement
1:05:39, Lee Si-chuan. As an administrative
1:05:41official and Deputy Mayor, helping with
1:05:44coordination is just your job. Now
1:05:46you're throwing "NVIDIA" into the Luzhou
1:05:48discussion, which won't help your
1:05:50election. Now, let's look at Kaohsiung.
1:05:53In Kaohsiung, we have Ke Chih-en from
1:05:55the KMT and Lai Jui-lung from the DPP.
1:05:58Recently, there was a Taiwan volunteer
1:06:00firefighter assembly over the weekend.
1:06:02What does "Yi Xiao" mean? Volunteer
1:06:06firefighters.
1:06:08Wang Jin-pyng is a major supporter of
1:06:10the volunteer firefighters.
1:06:13The volunteer firefighters all respect
1:06:16Wang Jin-pyng. Since the assembly was
1:06:19held in Kaohsiung, wouldn't Wang
1:06:21Jin-pyng go on stage? Kaohsiung Mayor
1:06:23Chen Chi-mai went on stage, along with
1:06:26others. Since they are Kaohsiung
1:06:28legislators, they naturally invited Lai
1:06:30Jui-lung on stage as well. And you, Ke
1:06:32Chih-en, should also have gone on stage
1:06:34; you are a legislator too, after all.
1:06:36But Ke Chih-en didn't go up. She didn't
1:06:39want to stand with Lai Jui-lung. Wang
1:06:41Jin-pyng was about to sing, you know,
1:06:44the volunteer firefighter anthem, "You
1:06:46are my brother, you are my brother."
1:06:49Wang Jin-pyng was happily ready to sing
1:06:52, but Ke Chih-en called him down.
1:06:55She dragged him off.
1:06:57In the end, Wang Jin-pyng sang off-stage
1:07:00, and Ke Chih-en and the others stood
1:07:02together.
1:07:04Everyone, take a look at this scene. Is
1:07:07this good or bad? Come, let's take a
1:07:10look.
1:07:11Former Legislative Yuan President Wang
1:07:13Jin-pyng, serving as the honorary chief
1:07:15of the volunteer firefighters, attended
1:07:17the Kaohsiung Volunteer Firefighter
1:07:19Corps gratitude banquet. He was happily
1:07:21singing on stage with everyone, but
1:07:23unexpectedly, the process was
1:07:25interrupted.
1:07:26>> KMT Kaohsiung mayoral candidate Ke
1:07:28Chih-en and party councilors stepped
1:07:31forward to whisper in Wang Jin-pyng’s
1:07:33ear, then immediately led him off the
1:07:36stage, leaving Speaker Wang Jin-pyng on
1:07:38stage.
1:07:39>> Wang Jin-pyng seemed unaffected,
1:07:41continuing to sing along with a
1:07:43microphone off-stage, finally showing
1:07:45his statesman-like grace by shaking
1:07:48hands with Green camp candidate Lai
1:07:50Jui-lung and Kaohsiung Mayor Chen
1:07:52Chi-mai.
1:07:52>> Alright, alright, everyone can interpret
1:07:55it however they like. Okay, I...
1:07:59OP9266, thanks for the tip. "Sister,
1:08:02your volume is very low." The sound
1:08:05shouldn't have anything to do with the
1:08:06internet, it's probably your settings.
1:08:08Strange, I haven't changed my settings.
1:08:10OK, OK, fine. Coming to 0604, thanks for
1:08:14the donation. The three stages: the
1:08:15prince phase, the high-handed phase, and
1:08:17the "bad boy" phase. The prince phase is
1:08:19when votes are highest, the high-handed
1:08:21phase is when they are lowest, and the "
1:08:23bad boy" phase is just returning to the
1:08:25base. Hey, I think you're quite an
1:08:27expert; he’s focusing on the base right
1:08:30now. What is the purpose of focusing on
1:08:32the base? If you only focus on the base
1:08:35, it means you're giving up on the
1:08:37moderate voters. That is just hoping the
1:08:39base doesn't collapse.
1:08:42What you’re aiming for now isn't
1:08:45necessarily over 50%, but everyone needs
1:08:47to be aware that all our analyses and
1:08:50discussions here don't represent the
1:08:52actual voting results.
1:08:55Who really wins or loses will only be
1:08:58known on November 28th. Right. Then 5477
1:09:02says if they win by 20%, I can travel
1:09:05with peace of mind. On one side, the DPP
1:09:08is talking about "fear of victory." They
1:09:11even formed a "Fear of Victory
1:09:13Association" where everyone reminds each
1:09:16other to fear winning. And on the Blue
1:09:18camp side, they’re saying "we won't lose
1:09:20, we won't lose.""A big victory, a great
1:09:23victory." 3632, there are quite a few 40
1:09:26-year-old buildings in Taipei and New
1:09:28Taipei, and even more that are 50 or 60
1:09:30years old. So many old houses are being
1:09:33renovated one after another, floor by
1:09:35floor. Yes. "Congratulations to Sister
1:09:37Xian for remembering the Wenlin Yuan
1:09:39incident." I remember, I remember the
1:09:41Wang family. Yes. Ah, Coco. If you run
1:09:45into holdout residents, don't even think
1:09:47about urban renewal. Last time, with
1:09:49this Wenlin Yuan incident, Hau Lung-bin
1:09:52had a miserable time. It was about urban
1:09:55renewal back then, but there were
1:09:57holdout residents who refused because
1:09:59they felt they weren't getting enough.
1:10:02They actually got quite a lot, but they
1:10:05thought they could get more, so they
1:10:07kept blocking it. Eventually, many NGOs
1:10:10came out to help. NGOs came out to help
1:10:13, and of course, some NGOs that leaned
1:10:16Green at the time used this to attack
1:10:19Hau Lung-bin.
1:10:22And these NGOs...These NGOs also teamed
1:10:25up with Ko Wen-je, who was running for
1:10:28mayor at the time.
1:10:30Understand? So, many things—why does
1:10:33politics sometimes get so dirty? It's
1:10:37because it's not easy to clearly explain
1:10:39the rights and wrongs in politics, but
1:10:42it is very easy to sway public opinion
1:10:44on political events, and most people
1:10:47won't get to the bottom of it. It then
1:10:49forms a subconscious and fixed
1:10:52impression. So many people maliciously
1:10:54use clickbait to assassinate character
1:10:56on the internet, calling a deer a horse
1:10:59to distort the truth, and steering
1:11:01public opinion to hurt those who are
1:11:03actually getting things done. I think
1:11:05Hau Lung-bin was really quite something
1:11:08regarding the Wenlin Yuan urban renewal
1:11:10case. As for the Wenlin Yuan case, maybe
1:11:13we can find some time to discuss it
1:11:15properly another day. But actually, it
1:11:17also has to do with the audience. They
1:11:20don't want to get to the bottom of
1:11:22things, and many in the media just chase
1:11:24the trending topics.
1:11:28If we really want to discuss an issue,
1:11:30we have to get to the root of it and
1:11:33untangle the complexities, but that's
1:11:35often no longer a hot topic, so politics
1:11:38often ends up encouraging the bad guys.
1:11:43Excuse me. It encourages the bad guys.
1:11:46It encourages bad money to drive out
1:11:49good. Li Li-li said he could memorize
1:11:51other scripts, so some people sympathize
1:11:53with Dai Chi-chin, because he has to
1:11:55follow him around and hear the same
1:11:57things several times a day. I corrected
1:11:58the name; the other day someone asked
1:12:00who actually started the free milk
1:12:02policy that Huang Wei-che supposedly
1:12:04copied. Let's talk about that tomorrow.
1:12:08No, he didn't say he copied the free
1:12:10milk, he said it was the nutritional
1:12:13lunch program. Huang Wei-che followed
1:12:16suit.
1:12:17This gets complicated and can't be
1:12:19explained in one sentence; Huang Wei-che
1:12:22has already come out to clarify. We can
1:12:24look back on many things as well.
1:12:28This involves nutritional lunch
1:12:30equipment, free milk, fruit, nutritional
1:12:33lunches, who manages it better, and all
1:12:36sorts of other issues.
1:12:39As for the media providing questions in
1:12:42advance, it feels like a deception,
1:12:44because obviously, the public assumes
1:12:46media questions are meant to be
1:12:47spontaneous. We, the audience, didn't
1:12:49know you media outlets were giving them
1:12:51the questions beforehand, did we? Our
1:12:53expectation was that no questions were
1:12:54provided, so discovering afterward that
1:12:56they were given in advance feels like a
1:12:58form of deception. But TVBS doesn't
1:13:00consider itself to have engaged in
1:13:03deception. Secondly, yes, they feel they
1:13:06gave the questions to both sides, but
1:13:08this is a cognitive confusion.
1:13:11Why? Because, for example, let's say you
1:13:15are the student who gets 100 on every
1:13:18test. Right.
1:13:21And I am the one who fails every time,
1:13:23and the teacher says, "Okay, tomorrow is
1:13:26the exam, we are giving everyone the
1:13:29questions in advance.
1:13:34" If everyone gets the questions
1:13:36beforehand, is that to the advantage of
1:13:38the straight-A student or to someone
1:13:41like me who fails?
1:13:45You all know the answer, don't you?
1:13:48So this is a classic example of why I
1:13:51say politics sometimes encourages the
1:13:54bad guys. On the surface, TVBS says, "I
1:13:57gave them to both sides, don't spread
1:14:00rumors," but...
1:14:05The premise of a debate is that it
1:14:08shouldn't be pre-prepared; you need to
1:14:10let the candidates think on their feet.
1:14:14That is the very essence of a debate.
1:14:21Otherwise, it becomes like a speech
1:14:23competition; as I said, if there is a
1:14:25top student and a bottom student, does
1:14:28giving the topic in advance favor the
1:14:31top student or the bottom student?
1:14:37Hey, I'm saying that I am the bottom
1:14:39student. I’m the one who’s failing; do
1:14:42you think it’s better for me or for the
1:14:44top student? Everyone knows, everyone
1:14:47knows, so stop trying to fool people.
1:14:49Alright, okay, we'll wrap it up here for
1:14:51today. Thank you, thank you. We'll
1:14:54continue chatting tomorrow about school
1:14:56lunches or whatever else, I'll just
1:14:58touch on a bit.

About this transcript

This page contains the full transcript of 2026/11/02黃智賢夜問1896集直播辯論后蔣贏氣勢沈贏支持！民調接連不利蔣！萬安警報響！/洋流大車掃週末連兩場！蔣萬安絕地反攻夫人牌接連出動！/4週不到國民黨如何救？悲情牌是最後武器！ by 黃智賢夜問, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 9,174 words across 1,555 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.

What you can do with it

Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.

Free YouTube transcript tool

YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.