2-1. CLIL Pedagogy — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:02I’m Yuen Yi Lo from the Faculty of Education, the University of Hong Kong.
- 0:07In this video, I’m going to talk about Content and Language Integrated Learning-CLIL Pedagogy.
- 0:18First of all, what is Content and Language Integrated Learning,
- 0:22CLIL? As its name suggests, CLIL is a dual-focused educational approach in which an
- 0:29additional language is used for the learning and teaching of both content and language.
- 0:36And in CLIL, both language and the subject have a joint role. This definition implies attention
- 0:43being paid to teaching both the content and the target language, for example English.
- 0:50More and more researchers have argued for more explicit instruction of language,
- 0:55especially in contexts where students’ exposure to target language is limited to CLIL classrooms.
- 1:04In general, the rationale behind integrating content and language teaching
- 1:10is that language learning can be facilitated by the meaningful communicative context provided
- 1:16by content subjects, so content and language should be integrated,
- 1:21but the question is how to do so in real practice. As Dalton-Puffer highlighted,
- 1:28the program of integration in CLIL needs to be solved on the level of the different pedagogies.
- 1:35Teachers need to link up the pedagogies of the different subjects, like mathematics, history or
- 1:41economics with the pedagogy of language teaching. In what follows, I will synthesize some literature
- 1:49to explore how teachers can plan language and content integrated lesson.
- 1:58The first step for every unit on lesson planning is to set the learning objectives.
- 2:04For CLIL lessons, teachers need to plan both content and language learning objectives.
- 2:10When teachers do so, the most important rule is that the two sets of objectives
- 2:15should be closely related to each other, so that the language objectives are not
- 2:21imposed on the content subject lessons which will become too language oriented. To do so,
- 2:28teachers can first identify the content objectives and then set the related language objectives.
- 2:39How to set content objectives? They are usually about the concepts or knowledge of a particular
- 2:45topic in content subjects. They also covered cognitive skills involved in the subject.
- 2:53Teachers can refer to the Bloom's taxonomy for different levels of cognitive skills,
- 2:58including remember, understand, apply, analyze, evaluate and create.
- 3:08Language objectives may cover different levels or layers of language.
- 3:13We may refer to the Genre Egg proposed by Lin to understand the different layers of language.
- 3:20Within a curriculum context, for example different content subjects, there are different text types
- 3:28which achieve particular communicative functions, such as arguing for a point of view, explaining
- 3:35the occurrence of a phenomenon, recounting a historical event. To achieve these functions,
- 3:42the authors would use different vocabulary items, grammar features, sentence patterns and also text
- 3:49structures. After analyzing these language features associated with the topic concerned,
- 3:56teachers can set the language objectives.
- 4:05To set the objectives for CLIL, or content-based lessons,
- 4:09Cammarata proposed the Content-Language-Literacy Integration Framework. This framework consists
- 4:17of four sets of objectives, and each set has different components. For content objectives,
- 4:24they include the knowledge targeted, cognitive skills involved, and activities. For academic
- 4:32literacy skills objectives, they include literacy skills related to complete the task,
- 4:39textual materials used, and written or oral academic production. For content-related
- 4:46language objectives, they refer to the functions that students perform with language,
- 4:52some grammatical structures and vocabulary items. And for the literacy-related language objectives,
- 5:00they input the language involved in reading, listening, writing and speaking. The arrows
- 5:08in the framework show that these sets of objectives are interrelated.
- 5:15Let me use the examples taken from Cammarata's work to further illustrate the framework. This
- 5:22is a topic about air pollution. For the content objectives, students will be able to identify
- 5:30key pollutants related to air pollution by interpreting data from three air quality indexes
- 5:37and completing a graphic organizer requiring them to compare and contrast information.
- 5:44For academic literacy skills objectives, students will demonstrate targeted mastery in reading and
- 5:51writing by identifying and describing the role of key components of an air quality index included
- 5:57in the three online air quality indexes, so as to later be able to give a personal opinion regarding
- 6:04the impact of car emission on air pollution. For the content-related language objectives,
- 6:11students will describe information found in air quality indexes by using the present tense,
- 6:17third person singular and adjectives with words, phrases, frames, such as today the air quality is.
- 6:27The literacy-related language objectives, students will use conjunctions showing cause and effect,
- 6:33to provide a convincing argument when developing their final project.
- 6:41If the four sets of objectives are too complicated, teachers could start with
- 6:46two sets: content and language related objectives. Here is an example. This unit
- 6:54was designed for grade 2 students learning science through English, and is about shadow.
- 7:00For the science related objectives, students will understand how shadows happen, understand the
- 7:07rules of shadows, and understand the relationship between the strength of light sources and shadows.
- 7:15The English related learning objectives correspond to the science ones.
- 7:20Students need to understand and use science terms related to shadows, such as light source,
- 7:26object, shadows. Students will also describe how shadows happen in a sentence
- 7:33and they need to describe the result of an experiment related to shadows.
- 7:41After setting the objectives, teachers need to design instructional activities to help
- 7:46students to achieve the learning objectives. Here I would like to introduce two relevant frameworks:
- 7:54The Contextualization, Awareness, Practice, and Autonomy, CAPA Sequence, and the Multimodalities
- 8:02and Entextualisation Cycle, MEC. I will briefly introduce them. For the CAPA sequence proposed
- 8:14by professor Roy Lyster in the context of Canadian Immersion, there are four stages.
- 8:20In a noticing stage, students are exposed to the target language in the meaningful context
- 8:27provided by the content subject. In the second and third stage, students’ attention is drawn to
- 8:34the target language features through awareness raising activity and guided language practice.
- 8:40And in the fourth stage, students are given some autonomous practice related to the topic.
- 8:47Throughout the four stages, students’ attention is shifted from content to
- 8:52language and back to content again. Thereby, integrating content and language learning.
- 9:00Again, I would like to refer to an example from Lyster's work to illustrate the CAPA sequence.
- 9:08This history unit is for grade 4 students in French immersion programs.
- 9:13The content objective is to understand the causes
- 9:17and effects of Jacques Cartier’s three exploratory voyages to the new world.
- 9:23And the language objective is to consolidate students’ knowledge of using past tense in French.
- 9:33In the first stage, students watch a video about the life of Jacques Cartier
- 9:40and then teachers and students discuss the route of the three voyages and effects.
- 9:46In the second stage, students read the transcript of the video with instances of past tense bolded.
- 9:55Then the teacher guide students to identify the instances and structure of past tense in French,
- 10:02for example the use of different auxiliary verbs.
- 10:07In the third stage, students make sentences to describe important events or places related to
- 10:12the explorer, using some different verbs in the past tense and teacher gives corrective feedback.
- 10:20Finally, students produce a timeline depicting the landmark events related to Jacques Cartier
- 10:26including a legend for each key event and teacher gives feedback on both content and language.
- 10:36The second framework is MEC: Multimodalities and Textualization Cycle,
- 10:42which is based on the teaching learning cycle from fitness with stronger based pedagogy.
- 10:48The NEC consists of three stages and suggests the use of different communicative resources,
- 10:54such as multimodal resources and different registers of languages in different stages.
- 11:05Stage 1 aims to create a rich experiential context and arouse students’ interest in the topic.
- 11:12In this stage multimodal learning resources,
- 11:15such as video clips, pictures, demonstrations are very useful.
- 11:23For example, we can show students pictures, graphs or video clips and from students to
- 11:30predict what the topic is about. And we also check how much they know about the topic.
- 11:37These pictures, diagrams and videos are about the topic traffic congestion.
- 11:47We can also use mobile APPs to illustrate some concepts, for example,
- 11:53a teacher used this mobile APP to demonstrate the theory of Brownian Motion in science.
- 12:01In stage 2, the teacher tries to engage students in reading the academic text and then summarize
- 12:09the content with some notes. During this stage, different registers of students first
- 12:15and target language can be used together with visuals, like graphic organizers and mind maps.
- 12:26To help students with difficult academic texts, we will encourage teachers to do
- 12:31detailed reading with the students. These are some steps of doing detailed reading.
- 12:38First, the teacher identifies the part of the text, making sure students know each position.
- 12:46The teachers then paraphrase the meaning using everyday language. The teacher asks
- 12:52students to read the text and underline any difficult words or academic vocabulary.
- 12:59The teacher elaborates the meaning on difficult vocabulary with examples and question them.
- 13:06The teachers and students then discuss any academic functions,
- 13:11scientific and specific sentence patterns of the text with the students.
- 13:16And after reading the whole paragraph or the whole text, the teacher identifies
- 13:20the paragraph or text structure, that is the organization of the paragraphs or the whole text.
- 13:28Doing their detailed reading, not only unpacks the content
- 13:32and language for the students, but also demonstrates how to root for the students.
- 13:40For note taking or summarizing the main ideas of the text, there are different kinds of
- 13:46graphic organizers that teachers can use, for example timelines are very useful for historical
- 13:53recounts while Venn diagrams or tables are typically associated with comparison and contrast.
- 14:09After stage 1 and 2, students will be prepared for the final stage which is engaging students
- 14:17in and entextualising their experiences. In this stage, students are scaffolded to put their
- 14:23experience into a text, that is the process of entextualisation. They are supported by concrete
- 14:31language scaffolding tools, such as vocabulary list, key sentence frames and writing prompts.
- 14:44This is a writing template we designed for junior secondary school students
- 14:49to write a one-sided argument. To answer the question about the most influential
- 14:55achievement from the period Renaissance, we divided the essay into four stages.
- 15:02Students need to state the argument, that is, the achievement they have chosen
- 15:06in the first stage and then describe what it is and explain how influential it is. They also need
- 15:14to explain why this chosen achievement is more influential than other achievements in the period
- 15:21before reiterating the argument in the conclusion stage. With such guiding framework,
- 15:29students find it easier to organize their ideas and put them into a coherent text.
- 15:38This is a very brief introduction of CLIL pedagogy
- 15:41and different frameworks. Please refer to these references for more details.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of 2-1. CLIL Pedagogy by 蘇瑩珊 Su, Ying-Shan 9608035, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 1,783 words across 135 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.