経営者よ!今こそ日本の未来のために銃を持て【第101回 日本未来会議】 — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00Business leaders. Now is the time to
- 0:03take up arms for Japan's future.
- 0:05>> Whoa.
- 0:07>> I am a professional hunter.
- 0:09>> It feels like a totally absurd proposal
- 0:11.
- 0:11>> I can take down anyone within about 100
- 0:13kilometers.
- 0:14>> Huh?
- 0:15>> Take down. In this show's history, has
- 0:18anyone's opinion ever changed this much
- 0:20from start to finish?
- 0:30>> Japan Future Conference.
- 0:35>> This program is brought to you by the
- 0:37following sponsors. And so, it begins.
- 0:41Japan Future Conference, Noguchi-san,
- 0:43looking forward to working with you
- 0:45again. Well, for our 100th episode
- 0:48milestone, we received a lot of
- 0:50feedback from everyone on how we should
- 0:52improve things. And one idea that was
- 0:54immediately adopted is...
- 0:55>> Yes.
- 0:56>> Yes. Wait, and...
- 0:57>> To the best presenter...
- 0:58>> Yeah.
- 0:59>> Um...
- 0:59>> A prize of 100,000 yen...
- 1:01>> Wait, oh.
- 1:02>> Will be awarded.
- 1:03>> For real?
- 1:04>> For real.
- 1:05>> Could you clearly define the criteria?
- 1:07>> Well, for now, if a majority of the
- 1:08Future Council members approve...
- 1:10>> Oh, I see.
- 1:11>> And finally, if I, as the chair...
- 1:13>> Yeah. ...give the final approval, those
- 1:15are the two conditions.
- 1:16>> Yes. Isn't that a bit too lenient?
- 1:17>> Lenient. Is it lenient?
- 1:19>> Are you sure? Well then, yes. Yes.
- 1:21Let's kick things off with that today,
- 1:23and we have a first-time commentator
- 1:24joining us. Sakaguchi-san. Nice to meet
- 1:27you.
- 1:28>> Nice to meet you. Nice to meet you.
- 1:30>> I'm Sakaguchi from Shannon
- 1:32Entertainment Co., Ltd. I run beauty
- 1:34salons and manage a voluntary chain in
- 1:36the beauty industry with about 180
- 1:38companies.
- 1:39>> I see. That's about 600 locations.
- 1:42>> Like the King of Salons. I'll do my
- 1:43best to become the King. We look
- 1:45forward to it.
- 1:46>> Yes, looking forward to it.
- 1:49>> The Japan Future Conference: Opposition
- 1:51Time to highlight problems and risks in
- 1:54the proposer's idea, and Proponent Time
- 1:56to build concrete plans for realization
- 1:58. A conference questioning the
- 2:02evolution of proposals through both
- 2:04opposing and supporting approaches
- 2:06starts now. Let's have today's
- 2:14presenter join us. He's quite a
- 2:17character.
- 2:18>> Yeah.
- 2:22>> I am the Representative Director of the
- 2:23Japan Hunters Association. The theme I
- 2:27have brought today is: Business leaders
- 2:29. Now is the time to take up arms for
- 2:32Japan's future.
- 2:33>> Whoa.
- 2:37>> The damage caused by wild animals is
- 2:40becoming serious nationwide. Crop
- 2:42damage reached 18.8 billion yen in
- 2:45fiscal 2024, an increase of 2.4 billion
- 2:48yen from the previous year. Meanwhile,
- 2:52the aging population of hunting license
- 2:55holders is a challenge, and securing
- 2:57successors is essential. In light of
- 3:01this, the presenter proposes "
- 3:03executives" as the solution. What
- 3:06exactly does that mean? Please state
- 3:10your opening remarks.
- 3:12>> I am a professional game meat
- 3:14specialist.
- 3:15>> Huh?
- 3:16>> Originally, I was a hunter.
- 3:18>> Is this okay to broadcast?
- 3:19>> It’s fine.
- 3:20>> After running a restaurant, I served
- 3:22game meat to about 230 people at the
- 3:25French Embassy in 2016. Later, I went
- 3:28into the mountains myself, launched the
- 3:30Choshu Gibier Group in 2017, and now
- 3:32handle everything from operating a
- 3:34hunting school to capture, processing,
- 3:36and product development, while touring
- 3:38the country in a food truck and
- 3:39becoming Japan's top game meat provider
- 3:41. That experience revealed something to
- 3:44me. As a national policy, 10 to 15
- 3:47billion yen in tax revenue, combining
- 3:49main and supplementary budgets, is
- 3:51spent on wildlife damage
- 3:52countermeasures. Yet, the problem
- 3:55remains completely unsolved. I assume
- 3:58you are all high-taxpayers, and while
- 4:00paying taxes is important, there are
- 4:02social issues here that cannot be
- 4:03solved just by continuing to pay taxes.
- 4:06What this industry needs now is a new
- 4:08economic framework. This learning
- 4:13creates jobs and generates an economy,
- 4:15and that economy creates occupations
- 4:17and turns social issues into businesses
- 4:19. Thank you. Please return to your seat
- 4:23. Yes. Your proposal for executives to
- 4:28"carry guns" left me wondering what you
- 4:30meant, but should we understand this as
- 4:33a call for executives to get more
- 4:34involved in game meat and wildlife
- 4:36issues? That's right. Yes. For our
- 4:42first vote, I would like you to hold up
- 4:44your placards. For this first vote, the
- 4:50future assembly members will express
- 4:51whether they agree or disagree with the
- 4:53presenter's proposal at this time.
- 4:58>> Please do so all at once.
- 5:01>> Yes.
- 5:05>> It is 2 in favor and 5 against, making
- 5:07it 2 to 5. Now, it's time for the
- 5:11opposition.
- 5:11>> Opposition time. Everyone from the
- 5:15opposition will thoroughly point out
- 5:17the risks and practical obstacles of
- 5:19the proposal. Opposition time starts
- 5:23now. Well, I need to find reasons to
- 5:27support this rather than oppose it, so
- 5:29I'd like to dig a little deeper. Is the
- 5:33primary goal of introducing guns into
- 5:35this calculation economic growth,
- 5:37education and awareness, or perhaps
- 5:40problem-solving? Could you tell me more
- 5:43about that?
- 5:46>> I believe we should build new
- 5:48businesses and professions by firmly
- 5:49incorporating economic activities into
- 5:51this, and I think business owners
- 5:53should take the lead in creating that
- 5:55economy. For this fiscal year, 9.9
- 5:58billion yen in taxes has been invested,
- 6:01plus about 5 billion in the
- 6:02supplementary budget, totaling around
- 6:0515 billion yen. But who is actually
- 6:07doing the hard work right now? It’s
- 6:09the elderly. People in their 70s and
- 6:1180s.
- 6:11>> The so-called hunting association
- 6:13members. Yes.
- 6:14>> That's right. Even though those retired
- 6:17hunters are really doing it as a hobby,
- 6:19the government is dragging them out to
- 6:21do it. It’s not working at all, and
- 6:26it's not solving the problem, which is
- 6:28part of the issue. So, are you saying
- 6:34that business owners should literally
- 6:36pick up guns and become hunters, or are
- 6:38you asking us to get involved in this
- 6:40problem more proactively as a business?
- 6:45Which is it?
- 6:46>> Both, actually.
- 6:47>> Both? Both?
- 6:48>> Yes. Actually, being a hunter is very
- 6:50well-suited for business owners.
- 6:52>> I see.
- 6:53>> Oh.
- 6:53>> Salarymen can't really do it, right? In
- 6:55terms of time,
- 6:56>> Yes. And also economically, there are
- 6:58many parts that are difficult for
- 6:59salarymen, and the screening process is
- 7:01quite strict as well. Are you
- 7:04suggesting I join a hunting association
- 7:06, or are you asking me to turn this
- 7:08into a business at my company? Which
- 7:11one is it? I am currently conducting
- 7:14hunting activities as a corporation.
- 7:17And I am not a member of a hunting
- 7:19association. Because that side is
- 7:20strictly for leisure and hobbies.
- 7:22>> So you treat it completely as a
- 7:23business.
- 7:24>> Exactly. Hunting associations are for
- 7:26hobbies, so...
- 7:26>> So you're saying you're doing it as a
- 7:27professional?
- 7:28>> Yes, that’s why I am conducting
- 7:29>> capture activities as a business.
- 7:31>> Yeah. So, unless we approach this as a
- 7:33business, I don't think we can create
- 7:35an economy. We can't just kill the
- 7:38animals; we need to focus on promoting
- 7:40wild game as a product, which is what's
- 7:42happening nationwide now.
- 7:44>> Well, to answer Mr. Kindo's question,
- 7:46you mean the latter?
- 7:47>> That's right. As a business.
- 7:49>> Yes, a business.
- 7:50>> You mean turning a profit as a
- 7:51standalone business?
- 7:52>> Uh, is it profitable?
- 7:53>> That is what I want you to aim for. Aim
- 7:54for it?
- 7:55>> Is it actually profitable?
- 8:00>> I am making a profit.
- 8:01>> Well,
- 8:02>> but overall,
- 8:03>> it shouldn't be profitable at all.
- 8:04>> Then why hasn't it become an industry
- 8:06until now? Doesn't the fact that so
- 8:08much tax money is being invested mean
- 8:09there's a market for it? Ah,
- 8:11>> I think there is still a great deal of
- 8:13work needed to create that market from
- 8:14here on out. Wild game is, after all,
- 8:16just one type of food ingredient, and
- 8:18it still carries many negative,
- 8:20old-fashioned stereotypes. However,
- 8:23it's treated as a high-end ingredient
- 8:24in French cuisine, so I'd like to see
- 8:26all of you managers use your influence
- 8:28to help boost the industry.
- 8:29>> Are there countries overseas where it
- 8:31has been industrialized?
- 8:32>> Yes, there are.
- 8:33>> Oh, so there are.
- 8:34>> I'd like to hear about that.
- 8:35>> It's originally a natural ingredient,
- 8:37right? They are natural Japanese
- 8:39ingredients, but eating natural
- 8:40ingredients has become quite common
- 8:42overseas. In Japan, we prioritize
- 8:45eating livestock, but in that sense,
- 8:47for instance in France, eating wild
- 8:48game is just like eating what's
- 8:50naturally found in the mountains.
- 8:55Because Japan has become so westernized
- 8:57, there's a strong image that these
- 8:59natural ingredients fall outside the
- 9:01norm, so I think it might be
- 9:02interesting to export them as "Made in
- 9:04Japan." It doesn't seem financially
- 9:09viable. If there are three problems you
- 9:12want to solve, is it about solving the
- 9:14issue of bears appearing, so we need
- 9:16more hunters? Or is it about spreading
- 9:19the culture of game meat? Or is it
- 9:23neither, and you're actually targeting
- 9:24a huge market and want to use this as a
- 9:26pillar for economic growth? Which one
- 9:30are you aiming to solve?
- 9:31>> I believe it's the economy. The economy
- 9:33? Not hunting itself?
- 9:35>> Well, ultimately, even when it comes to
- 9:37hunting, the reality in the industry
- 9:38right now is that people might go out
- 9:40once a week, if that.
- 9:41>> So, in other words, carrying a gun is
- 9:43just a means to an end?
- 9:44>> It's one of the means, yes.
- 9:46>> Are you saying you're proposing the
- 9:47means of having people carry guns to
- 9:48develop the economy?
- 9:49>> Yes. If you're calling it a profession,
- 9:51that feels like a poor sense of
- 9:53business, considering 10 to 15 billion
- 9:54yen in tax money is being poured into
- 9:56it, right? For example, you use those
- 9:58tax dollars to exterminate them, don't
- 10:00you?
- 10:00>> Yes. And what you just said is that we
- 10:03should take those bears that were
- 10:04exterminated and use them as food,
- 10:06right?
- 10:07>> That's correct.
- 10:08>> Wait, is that tax money already being
- 10:10used for something like repurposing
- 10:11them?
- 10:12>> No, actually, over 90%is discarded.
- 10:15>> What?
- 10:16>> Why is that?
- 10:17>> Well, there are various issues, such as
- 10:19the fundamental problem that they
- 10:20aren't captured in a state suitable for
- 10:22consumption to begin with, but
- 10:23ultimately, it’s because the market
- 10:25still hasn't matured.
- 10:26>> So, there’s no distribution network.
- 10:28>> Then it's not profitable, is it? We
- 10:30want to build that with everyone's help
- 10:31starting now.
- 10:32>> Hmm. But it doesn't even taste good
- 10:34right now.
- 10:35>> I'm from Yamanashi, so I grew up eating
- 10:37game meat on a regular basis. And in
- 10:40our case, we don't buy it; we get it
- 10:42from people. From neighbors who are
- 10:45hunters.
- 10:46>> So I’ve eaten wild boar and venison
- 10:48and such, but...
- 10:50>> It doesn't taste good at all. If you
- 10:52were to buy game meat at a supermarket
- 10:54to cook at home, you'd only be able to
- 10:56make a god-awful, dry stew. So, hearing
- 11:02this, I feel it would be a very high
- 11:04hurdle to popularize game meat and make
- 11:06it a familiar ingredient for the
- 11:08general public. As a professional chef,
- 11:17I believe that not every ingredient,
- 11:20every deer, or every life is delicious.
- 11:22It’s difficult to eat older animals,
- 11:24but a major issue in this country is
- 11:26that there are no proper quality
- 11:28standards in place. The hunters are
- 11:30often just amateurs, too. We need
- 11:32leaders—managers who specialize in
- 11:34developing people—who can clearly
- 11:35distinguish between what is delicious
- 11:37and what is not. I believe that if we
- 11:39create an economic model for hunting,
- 11:41people will emerge who can do this as a
- 11:42full-time profession. Right now, it’s
- 11:44only on weekends. Because of that, we
- 11:46can't keep up. From an economic
- 11:48standpoint, it’s too weak. As for
- 11:52breaking the current reliance on
- 11:54retired elderly members of hunting
- 11:56associations, even if that’s the goal
- 11:58, I’m still against it. For instance,
- 12:03the number of people killed by wild
- 12:05animals like bears is only in the
- 12:07dozens. I saw data from 2023 showing it
- 12:10was only six people. When you look at
- 12:14the big picture, the economy doesn't
- 12:16matter as much as the fact that
- 12:18accidental shootings seem to cause more
- 12:20deaths. Even if there were economic
- 12:25viability in having more people carry
- 12:27guns, if it spreads, the proportion of
- 12:29accidents will rise as the ratio of
- 12:31amateurs increases, and the rate of
- 12:33accidental shootings will inevitably go
- 12:36up as more people handle firearms. If
- 12:40that happens, the goal of culling these
- 12:42animals will backfire, and the reality
- 12:44will be that more people are killed by
- 12:46friendly fire than by the animals
- 12:48themselves. It feels like a
- 12:52counterproductive proposal.
- 12:58>> I agree completely. If the number of
- 13:01people carrying guns increases, it
- 13:02means more armed people around us,
- 13:04which could lead to more incidents and
- 13:06a rise in related fatalities.
- 13:08>> It’s just plain scary, isn’t it?
- 13:10>> It really is.
- 13:11>> We run a hunting school, and I truly
- 13:13believe it comes down to education.
- 13:15Whether it’s about laws or safety, it
- 13:17has to be about education.
- 13:20>> But even with education, just like in
- 13:22other fields, incidents are still bound
- 13:24to happen, right? Yes.
- 13:26>> I think that an increase in numbers
- 13:27increases that possibility, but what do
- 13:29you think about that?
- 13:31>> Of course, regarding those aspects,
- 13:33before we enter our schools, the Public
- 13:35Safety Commission and the police
- 13:37conduct thorough vetting, so we are
- 13:39licensed only after extensive
- 13:40investigation, but we also want the
- 13:42screening to be done strictly.
- 13:44>> No, no, aren't you already screening
- 13:46them? Even though we’ve spent 70
- 13:49years making it incredibly difficult to
- 13:51own a gun, more people are killed by
- 13:53gun owners than by wild animals. I
- 13:57think that alone is a clear reason why
- 13:59we shouldn't increase the numbers, but
- 14:01is there any point that can counter
- 14:02that with numerical evidence? Well,
- 14:05then conversely, if the number of
- 14:07hunters does not increase
- 14:08>> Yes.
- 14:09>> If we consider what will happen, the
- 14:11only options are to capture them or to
- 14:13protect against them.
- 14:14>> Yes.
- 14:15>> So, I think we end up committing to the
- 14:17"protect" side of things.
- 14:18>> Yes.
- 14:19>> Currently, that budget of over 10
- 14:20billion yen is almost entirely for
- 14:22fences.
- 14:23>> I see.
- 14:23>> And it is a fact that even with those
- 14:25fences, we cannot fully protect
- 14:26everything, so there is a situation
- 14:28where we have to thin them out or
- 14:30exterminate them.
- 14:30>> Yes. Yes. Yes. And in that context, for
- 14:33example, when it comes to fighting a
- 14:35100kg bear, do you fight it with your
- 14:36bare hands?
- 14:37>> We still only have guns. Yeah. Yeah.
- 14:39>> And since we are in Tokyo, it’s hard
- 14:41to feel the reality of that kind of
- 14:43damage, but since you came from
- 14:45Yamanashi, I’m sure you’ve actually
- 14:46seen it, like people being chased.
- 14:49>> While they may not have died, there are
- 14:51many more people who have been injured.
- 14:52>> Yes.
- 14:53>> And a great many of these are elderly
- 14:55people. Since they are wild, they
- 14:56target the elderly and children more
- 14:58than us younger people. So, to protect
- 15:00against that, while we do use fences,
- 15:02we also have to go on the offensive to
- 15:05some extent, otherwise wild animals
- 15:07will keep coming into town, so I think
- 15:09it's one of the options. If we are
- 15:12mostly relying on people over 70 who
- 15:14should have already retired to do the
- 15:16shooting, then yes, accidents might
- 15:18increase. But if we have younger people
- 15:22with good reflexes and dynamic visual
- 15:24acuity handle the guns, I get the
- 15:26impression that accidents would be less
- 15:28likely. Yeah. I see. Yes. That
- 15:33concludes the opposition party's time.
- 15:36What are your thoughts on this so far?
- 15:39I feel like we should narrow the focus,
- 15:41as the economic aspect seems impossible
- 15:43.
- 15:43>> I get the feeling that, and also what
- 15:45Aoyama-san said......
- 15:47>> about it not being delicious, well, I
- 15:49think game meat can be delicious if
- 15:50prepared properly by a professional,
- 15:52but...
- 15:53>> There are places that serve it well,
- 15:54aren't there?
- 15:55>> But if the market expands and the
- 15:56general public starts cooking it,
- 15:57it’s not really......
- 15:58>> going to be that good, is it? I think
- 16:01what Zaimu-san wants to say is about
- 16:02the method of killing the game. Right
- 16:07now, the focus is just on culling, with
- 16:09the government paying hunters to do it,
- 16:11so it’s not meant for eating. However
- 16:15, if the goal were specifically to kill
- 16:17them for food, the situation might be
- 16:19different. Isn't that what you're
- 16:23trying to say?
- 16:24>> That's right. Thank you. That is
- 16:25exactly it.
- 16:26>> Yes. Well, what I think is that trying
- 16:28to do this for economic reasons is
- 16:30pretty much a lost cause, but the fact
- 16:33that there are so many animals causing
- 16:35damage is a constant problem, right? So
- 16:40, for the sake of simple safety, since
- 16:42the existing hunters aren't enough, if
- 16:44we don't narrow the focus to just
- 16:46allowing regular people to have guns to
- 16:48solve that problem, won't there always
- 16:50be division on this? Isn't it tough
- 16:54when you look at it from the
- 16:55perspective of economic rationality?
- 16:57>> Yeah.
- 16:58>> The scale is quite large, so I agree
- 17:00that we should probably consider these
- 17:02as separate issues. However, as long as
- 17:05the government is involved, what’s
- 17:07necessary is education and, of course,
- 17:09economic support.
- 17:10>> Yes. I think that's the area, so it
- 17:13would be best to talk a bit about that.
- 17:15>> Yeah. Well, also, when you think about
- 17:17doing it as a profession and getting
- 17:19paid,
- 17:20>> without sales or an economy, there's no
- 17:22money to pay salaries, so unless we
- 17:24create this economic activity, the
- 17:26profession itself won't come into
- 17:28existence.
- 17:29>> Yeah.
- 17:31>> We already know that doing it just once
- 17:33a week or once a month won't solve
- 17:35anything, so I really want businesses
- 17:36and managers to take the lead in making
- 17:38this an economic activity so that
- 17:40people can do it daily while getting
- 17:42paid properly.
- 17:44>> Yeah. Now, let's move on to the ruling
- 17:47party time.
- 17:48>> Ruling party time. Everyone becomes a
- 17:52proponent, adding advice and concrete
- 17:54measures to realize the proposal.
- 17:58>> Regarding the issue of guns from
- 17:59earlier, I also don't think it's a good
- 18:01idea for every business owner to carry
- 18:03a gun. However, keeping one as a final
- 18:08resort for when lives are threatened,
- 18:09or when schools or children are in
- 18:11grave danger, I think that could be one
- 18:13option. In fact, there were 238 victims
- 18:20in 2025, and the country is already
- 18:22moving toward revising laws to allow
- 18:24firing in some cases,
- 18:28>> but the way you approached it is just
- 18:30out of line; isn't it true that in
- 18:31places like Germany, you have to spend
- 18:33100 hours of training to be able to own
- 18:35a gun?
- 18:36>> Right, I totally get that. I think so
- 18:38too.
- 18:39>> Giving people guns as a safety net is
- 18:40the worst idea. So, you absolutely need
- 18:42to have strict standards, like
- 18:44obtaining proper qualifications.
- 18:46>> Even with standards, I believe Japan's
- 18:48safety comes from the fact that we
- 18:50don't and can't carry guns; after all,
- 18:52police officers go through intense
- 18:54training, don't they? So, if there were
- 18:57some kind of new qualification, I'm of
- 18:59the opinion that the possibility isn't
- 19:01zero. Is the line drawn at being
- 19:05allowed to fire in the city when
- 19:06animals enter and are about to attack
- 19:08children?
- 19:10>> Yeah. Well, I think that is one
- 19:12possible approach. I certainly
- 19:13understand Mr. Noshibu's opinion,
- 19:15though. I also think it’s not good
- 19:17for guns to be flooding the streets.
- 19:18>> But when someone is actually attacked
- 19:20in town, say a 100kg wild boar comes
- 19:22here and starts biting someone, the
- 19:24question becomes: who does what?
- 19:26>> Yeah.
- 19:27>> No one can fight it. Well, I actually
- 19:29train for it, by the way. If it's up to
- 19:31about 100kg, I can take it down
- 19:32barehanded.
- 19:33>> Wait, you take it down? I do.
- 19:35>> But I'll stop talking about it. Just,
- 19:37you know,
- 19:38>> It was right on the edge.
- 19:39>> I'm like Hanma Yujiro.
- 19:41>> It’s cutting it very close, but I can
- 19:43save someone. But can any of you
- 19:45business owners save someone?
- 19:46>> No, sounds impossible. I'm
- 19:50>> close to Mr. Ban. On the side of the
- 19:53demon.
- 19:54>> But, for example, if your own child
- 19:55were truly attacked by a wild animal,
- 19:57you wouldn't be able to stay so laid
- 19:59back.
- 19:59>> Yeah.
- 20:00>> I don't think you could. Farmers are
- 20:01mostly elderly, right? Grandmas and
- 20:03grandpas.
- 20:04>> Yeah.
- 20:04>> Those are the people being attacked.
- 20:06And annually, there is about 4 billion
- 20:08yen in rice crop damage.
- 20:09>> Yeah.
- 20:10>> People say there was no rice last year,
- 20:12but in the first place, the wildlife
- 20:14damage just won't decrease.
- 20:15>> And even if the numbers go down, many
- 20:17people end up quitting farming anyway.
- 20:18The damage is just too severe. So,
- 20:21while we need to solve this problem
- 20:22with rice in Japan, I have always
- 20:24believed that business owners should be
- 20:26the ones taking the lead on this.
- 20:28>> Yeah.
- 20:28>> Well, regarding the current issue, I do
- 20:30understand the argument that maybe we
- 20:32should sell [the weapons]. I feel like
- 20:34there must be some way to handle it,
- 20:36don't you?
- 20:36>> It’s not like we can have zero risk,
- 20:38is it? So many lives are, well, being
- 20:40killed; we are on the side that’s
- 20:41being killed.
- 20:42>> Well, but you know, Zosu seems to have
- 20:44the answer, so that’s true.
- 20:46>> Right, cars also kill people, don't
- 20:48they?
- 20:48>> They do. But we don't stop using them,
- 20:50do we? In the future, I think AI and
- 20:53such will solve both these animal
- 20:55control issues and car accidents in
- 20:57just a few years. Children, the elderly
- 21:02, and women are being targeted—men
- 21:04too, but as a Japanese man, I believe
- 21:06only women and children need to be made
- 21:09happy. What are you reading? What do
- 21:13you mean?
- 21:13>> What do you mean?
- 21:14>> Wait a minute.
- 21:15>> Because it's a textbook from the other
- 21:17day.
- 21:18>> I'm reading a blacked-out textbook.
- 21:21>> Don't think men deserve happiness. Die,
- 21:23men.
- 21:26>> Men have no choice.
- 21:28>> Heihachi Edajima.
- 21:31>> The teacher...
- 21:32>> It's a phrase the principal taught me.
- 21:34>> Yeah.
- 21:35>> If there aren't enough firefighters, as
- 21:37a manager, you join the volunteer fire
- 21:39corps. Yeah.
- 21:41>> Doing volunteer work like disaster
- 21:43prevention.
- 21:46>> That's what a man does, and since men
- 21:47are the majority, I think we'll win.
- 21:51Roar.
- 21:52>> If you don't stand up and fight then,
- 21:54what are you doing? Were you even born
- 21:56a man?
- 21:56>> Wait, does that mean fighting with your
- 21:58bare hands, not guns?
- 22:00>> If you have the spirit of Heihachi
- 22:01Edajima, they'll run away from you.
- 22:03Just by looking at them.
- 22:04>> Yes. It’s a fact. Even I, the moment
- 22:07a boar comes at me, it turns its back.
- 22:09They do. They’ve already lost.
- 22:11>> Eh?
- 22:11>> Heihachi. Wait.
- 22:14>> Shall we clarify?
- 22:16>> But at that moment, I catch up, grab
- 22:18its hind legs, and flip it over.
- 22:19>> Even though it's running away?
- 22:21>> Of course.
- 22:22>> I don't hold back.
- 22:24>> It's so real it's scary.
- 22:26>> Farmers are really in trouble, and
- 22:28there are many places where you can't
- 22:30fire a gun. Yeah.
- 22:32>> So, how do you handle it? You can
- 22:34oppose guns, but you have no choice but
- 22:35to use your bare hands. I want to see
- 22:38you flip a boar and beat it up. I
- 22:40upload those videos for my school, yes.
- 22:43>> I upload videos as study material.
- 22:45>> This is definitely...
- 22:48>> In the history of this show, has
- 22:49anyone's image changed so much toward
- 22:51the end?
- 22:53>> If there was a "Man School," I'd join
- 22:55it.
- 22:55>> It's almost inhuman. Are you human?
- 22:58Really, you're not human.
- 22:59>> Yes.
- 23:00>> I think I’ve surpassed over a
- 23:01thousand battles.
- 23:02>> A thousand? A thousand?
- 23:03>> At first, you said you killed them.
- 23:04That's right.
- 23:05>> Indeed. What I realized through this is
- 23:07that Japan is oblivious to reality
- 23:08because of peace.
- 23:08>> Oh, well, yeah.
- 23:10>> In the end, that's it.
- 23:11>> That’s why everyone pays so much in
- 23:12taxes.
- 23:13>> Well, they try to look good, right? I'm
- 23:15a business owner myself. However...
- 23:16>> It doesn't solve anything at all.
- 23:18Paying taxes doesn't fix it.
- 23:19>> If you ask what we should do, will the
- 23:21Self-Defense Forces do it? Will the
- 23:23police? Nobody will. Unless business
- 23:25owners take the lead, rally the
- 23:27Japanese people, and create a new
- 23:28organization saying "we will do it," it
- 23:30won't be solved for our grandchildren,
- 23:32or even a hundred years from now.
- 23:34>> I see.
- 23:34>> Yes. With that said, I would like to
- 23:37move on to the final statement by Mr.
- 23:39Yama.
- 23:40>> Final statement. Based on the
- 23:42discussions and advice so far, the
- 23:44proposer will make a final appeal of
- 23:46their intentions.
- 23:49>> If more than half are in favor, and
- 23:51Chairman Noguchi deems it necessary, a
- 23:53prize will be awarded, so Mr. Yama,
- 23:55please begin your final statement. Go
- 23:58ahead.
- 23:59>> Yes. What I wanted to convey is that,
- 24:03in the current global situation, I want
- 24:05people to understand that we must
- 24:06firmly protect ourselves as Japanese,
- 24:08and I want business owners to become
- 24:10those leaders. I hope everyone will
- 24:15study with the goal of obtaining a gun
- 24:17permit. Mm. Yes, thank you. Now, please
- 24:22provide your final judgment. After the
- 24:26statements and discussion, the members
- 24:28will express their final vote. The
- 24:31representatives for and against will
- 24:33make their final arguments to Chairman
- 24:35Noguchi, who holds the deciding vote.
- 24:40>> All in favor or against, please show
- 24:42your signs now.
- 24:43>> Oh.
- 24:44>> Oh. Oh.
- 24:45>> Wow.
- 24:46>> This is crazy. This is crazy.
- 24:48>> 5 in favor, 2 against. Earlier it was 2
- 24:51in favor and 5 against, so it has
- 24:53completely flipped. Now, for the
- 24:57argument in favor, Mr. Yama, please.
- 25:01>> If you're a man, do it.
- 25:05>> That is all, but...
- 25:06>> Discussion.
- 25:07>> Yes. Then, for the discussion against
- 25:10...
- 25:10>> Mr. O, please.
- 25:12>> Of course, I share the awareness of the
- 25:14issues, such as the frequent damage
- 25:15caused by bears. However, I would like
- 25:17everyone to think about this once more.
- 25:19What image comes to mind when you hear
- 25:21"gun"? Some may think it's cool. But a
- 25:23gun is a very dangerous thing that has
- 25:25the power to kill a person. And in this
- 25:27discussion, members have also pointed
- 25:29out incidents like accidental shootings
- 25:31. If we are to let everyone carry such
- 25:34an extremely dangerous thing, I believe
- 25:36overwhelming logic is required.
- 25:37Economic growth, or perhaps being able
- 25:39to eat surprisingly delicious food.
- 25:42Were those arguments really fully
- 25:43reflected in today's discussion? I
- 25:46don't feel they were. And hearing
- 25:48moving episodes makes one want to get
- 25:49excited. It's thrilling. However, we
- 25:52must also turn our eyes to the sad
- 25:54history where such excitement and
- 25:56aspirations triggered that war. For
- 25:59those reasons, I urge everyone to take
- 26:01a cautious stance on this proposal to
- 26:03arm many people, and I state my strong
- 26:05determination not to award the 100,000
- 26:07yen to the first presenter, concluding
- 26:09my opposition speech. Thank you.
- 26:12>> Yes. Now that everyone is opposed, the
- 26:19fate of the prize money rests on Mr.
- 26:21Noguchi's final decision.
- 26:26>> Now, Mr. Noguchi, before your final
- 26:28verdict for the Future Conference based
- 26:30on the discussions so far, a commercial
- 26:32break. The Japan Future Conference,
- 26:36today's topic is this. Solve the call
- 26:39center labor shortage with AI. There's
- 26:43no way current AI technology can handle
- 26:45complex call center tasks, right?
- 26:47>> It can't. Exactly. I don't need it at
- 26:50all.
- 26:50>> I'll handle everything myself.
- 26:51>> No mistakes.
- 26:52>> Mr. Noguchi, please give us your final
- 26:54verdict.
- 26:55>> Approved.
- 26:56>> Really?
- 26:56>> Yes.
- 26:57>> Whether it's technical issues or sheer
- 26:59willpower, Callways can solve it.
- 27:01>> Really?
- 27:02>> Huh.
- 27:07>> If you want AI to handle your phone
- 27:09calls, Callways is the one. For details
- 27:15, search for Callways.
- 27:17>> Mr. Noguchi, please give your final
- 27:19verdict. The final verdict is rejected.
- 27:23>> Oh! I wrote "Business Owners?" as a
- 27:26question. You see, everyone, I think
- 27:28you're under the misconception that
- 27:30business owners are excellent people.
- 27:32Yes. Business owners, well, they just
- 27:34want to cause a firestorm on social
- 27:36media. They're all just fools.
- 27:38>> So, should we really be arming them?
- 27:40That's true.
- 27:41>> Yeah.
- 27:43>> Honestly, the reason I love the country
- 27:45of Japan is because of its safety and
- 27:47stability. No, I understand. The bear
- 27:51problem is particularly critical, so it
- 27:54really must be solved. The issue of
- 27:58relying on local hunters over 70 also
- 28:00needs addressing, but I don't think the
- 28:02Japan Future Conference can endorse the
- 28:04idea of business owners casually taking
- 28:07up arms.
- 28:08>> True.
- 28:09>> Yeah. That’s what I thought.
- 28:10>> By the way, people who own guns are
- 28:12vetted by the police; conversely, that
- 28:14means those of us here who can't own
- 28:16guns are social misfits.
- 28:17>> Wait, what do you mean?
- 28:18>> Yeah, we're social misfits. What, what
- 28:20does that mean? What are you saying?
- 28:22>> The thing is, only people who are
- 28:24socially and economically fully vetted
- 28:26can ever be allowed to own a gun.
- 28:28>> Mentally, too.
- 28:29>> I want one. Well, I want one.
- 28:31>> So, it's impossible. Impossible.
- 28:33>> Exactly. That’s why I chose business
- 28:35owners. I thought that hurdles which
- 28:37might be too high for the general
- 28:38public could be overcome by business
- 28:40owners, which is why it was the topic
- 28:41today. Yes. I’m sorry. Business
- 28:43owners are, uh, idiots.
- 28:45>> Yes. With that said, Mr. Noguchi, thank
- 28:47you very much. Well, that brings us to
- 28:49the result of rejection, but presenter
- 28:51Yama-san, how did you feel about it?
- 28:54>> Yes, it was a short time so I don’t
- 28:56think everything came across clearly,
- 28:58but I do believe the initial image has
- 29:00changed at least a little bit. However,
- 29:03this is truly a problem for the nation;
- 29:05it has become a national policy issue.
- 29:08So, as for who should tackle this,
- 29:10there’s only so much we can rely on
- 29:11politicians for, so I think it would be
- 29:13good for various business owners to
- 29:15take on the challenge, and I intend to
- 29:17keep moving forward with it. Thank you.
- 29:21Well, after hearing everything today, I
- 29:23think the viewers now recognize that
- 29:25this is a problem that truly must be
- 29:27solved. Now, as for whether business
- 29:32owners should be the ones to solve it,
- 29:34Mr. Noguchi raised some doubts at the
- 29:35end, but while I was looking at Mr.
- 29:37Kita's face, I couldn't help but think
- 29:39there might still be more that politics
- 29:41can do.
- 29:44>> Well, for example, in areas actually
- 29:46plagued by these issues, instead of
- 29:48just relying on committee members with
- 29:50little more than volunteer pay, I was
- 29:52thinking while listening that we could
- 29:53try things like securing a more
- 29:55substantial budget to address the
- 29:57situation properly. What did you all
- 30:00think about this? Please let us know
- 30:02your thoughts in the comments section.
- 30:05And, in addition to your feedback on
- 30:07the program, I would also appreciate it
- 30:08if you could like the video and
- 30:10subscribe to the channel. We'll see you
- 30:12again at the Japan Future Conference.
- 30:14Thank you very much. This is the man
- 30:19who caused the hit-and-run incident.
- 30:21Can we change the subject? Yes. Yes.
- 30:23That's right.
- 30:24>> Business owners should stir up
- 30:26controversy to gain recognition. Why
- 30:28did he come back? It seems he still
- 30:30hasn't escaped the demon of wanting to
- 30:32be a merchant.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of 経営者よ!今こそ日本の未来のために銃を持て【第101回 日本未来会議】 by 日本未来会議, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 5,299 words across 895 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.