02/3 - Teoria do ordenamento jurídico de Norberto Bobbio - matéria de IED direito — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:01Hey everyone, we're giving a very
- 0:03simple, direct, and didactic
- 0:05explanation of Norberto Bobbio's theory
- 0:08of legal order, the book that appears
- 0:10most frequently on the OAB exam in the
- 0:13introduction and study of law section
- 0:15—that part, you know, the
- 0:17propaedeutics of legal education, which
- 0:20is our area, our specialty. We
- 0:22specialize in this, right? That's what
- 0:24we do, okay? That's what we study our
- 0:26whole lives. Guys, let me do a reading
- 0:29for you. Look how interesting this is.
- 0:32The requirement for new research. Why
- 0:34new research? Why is this book new
- 0:36research for Norberto Bobbio? Because
- 0:38before this book he published the
- 0:40theory of the legal norm, okay? So if
- 0:43you haven't seen the video where we
- 0:44talked about the legal norm before, go
- 0:46back here, everyone, watch the previous
- 0:48video so that what I'm going to tell
- 0:49you now makes more sense, okay? So, the
- 0:53requirement for new research arises
- 0:55from the fact that, in reality, legal
- 0:57norms never exist in isolation, but
- 1:00always in a context of norms with
- 1:02particular relationships between them.
- 1:05And these relationships will be, to a
- 1:07large extent, the subject of our
- 1:08analysis in this book. This context of
- 1:12norms is usually called a legal system.
- 1:16Legal system, okay? So, look at what
- 1:19Bob's deal is now, folks. He previously
- 1:21wrote a theory of legal norms that
- 1:23wasn't sufficient. He wasn't satisfied.
- 1:26He says: "Oh, I don't understand what
- 1:28law is in all its richness and
- 1:29complexity based solely on the theory
- 1:32of legal norms. I need a new theory to
- 1:34complement—look, not to replace, not
- 1:37to refute—but to complement, to
- 1:40supplement the theory of norms and to
- 1:43show this part of the dynamics of a
- 1:46legal system, this structure, this form
- 1:49of organization of all the norms that
- 1:52are in force in a given country. And
- 1:55this new theory, folks, is what he will
- 1:58call the theory of the legal system.
- 2:00Okay? What does this theory say, folks?
- 2:03First, it considers that it is more
- 2:06important for us to understand law as a
- 2:10set of interrelated norms than as
- 2:13isolated norms, okay? That is, law is
- 2:16not a bunch of laws scattered around
- 2:18the world, right, published, foreseen,
- 2:20right, in international treaties, in
- 2:23conventions, in domestic law, but
- 2:25isolated, each one in its own square,
- 2:27right? Each law has a number, each
- 2:29article has a number. No, no, folks.
- 2:32Law is this cohesive, organized,
- 2:36coherent set of all this." A set of
- 2:39legal norms that encompasses a past, a
- 2:42past of culture and traditions, and
- 2:45also a future of values, of what we
- 2:48want for the future, right? So, folks,
- 2:51in this work he will begin to analyze
- 2:54the different sources of law, and he
- 2:56works with a distinction between
- 2:58original sources and derived sources,
- 3:01okay? For him, the original sources are
- 3:05power, okay? It's the legally original
- 3:09power, right? So today we believe in
- 3:12our current order, okay? that this
- 3:15original power of law is the
- 3:17constituent assembly, that is, it is
- 3:19that moment when the Chamber of
- 3:21Deputies, representatives of the entire
- 3:24people of a nation, unite to make a new
- 3:27constitution, okay? So this original
- 3:29constituent power, folks, is, let's say
- 3:32, the great material source, right, of
- 3:35a law, okay, in this conception of an
- 3:38original source, okay? The original
- 3:41source is that which is at the origin,
- 3:43it is that which is the basis, right,
- 3:45of the foundation of a legal order,
- 3:47right? And these powers, this original
- 3:50source of law, folks, have limits,
- 3:52right? It has There are both internal
- 3:55and external limits, right? The
- 3:58internal limits, recalling a concept
- 4:00from hobbies, which is what brings this
- 4:02up, right? It's the very notion of
- 4:06civil disobedience, right? So, the
- 4:08Leviathan, the sovereign power, the
- 4:10king, the emperor, and today, right,
- 4:12the presidents, the prime ministers,
- 4:14right, they don't have unlimited power,
- 4:17right? In a democratic state governed
- 4:19by the rule of law, folks, we have this
- 4:21division of power, right, into three
- 4:23major spheres: executive, legislative,
- 4:25and judicial. And within this division,
- 4:28this autonomy, right, in the use of
- 4:31powers, right, we have a kind of checks
- 4:34and balances, right, of these powers,
- 4:36right? So this ends up being a certain
- 4:39internal limit, right, to this very
- 4:42sovereign power of original creation of
- 4:45law, right? But in addition to that,
- 4:47there are also external limits today,
- 4:49right? There is today the limit of
- 4:52international law. The Nuremberg trials
- 4:54in Germany were one of the first to
- 4:56raise this issue, right? Note that in
- 4:59Germany there were trials of some
- 5:01Soldiers, right? Some Nazi soldiers and
- 5:03such. And the basis they used, right?
- 5:07Even though at that time they were
- 5:09following orders, they were following
- 5:12the legislation in force at the time,
- 5:14etc. They, the Nuremberg judges, right,
- 5:17decided that at that time, despite this
- 5:20internal law, right, this tyrannical,
- 5:22despotic, violent, etc., brutal law,
- 5:25there was also an international order
- 5:27for the preservation of human rights.
- 5:30There was an international law to which
- 5:32all these countries belonged. So,
- 5:34notice that there are external limits
- 5:36today as well, right? When we study
- 5:38transitional justice, it's a super
- 5:40important concept for us to understand
- 5:42that a state no longer has total
- 5:44freedom, like, "Oh, here within my
- 5:46country I create whatever law I want,"
- 5:48right? It's not quite like that anymore
- 5:50, right? You can create many laws,
- 5:52right? You can create a lot of things,
- 5:55but human rights today are a type of
- 5:57transitional law, it's a supranational
- 6:00law, it's a law that also needs to be
- 6:02cultivated, respected, and cared for,
- 6:05right? Including by this original
- 6:07source of law, right. That's the kind
- 6:10of sovereign power, right, or original
- 6:13constituent assembly, okay? Now, the
- 6:16derived sources, folks, are those
- 6:19sources that Norberto Bobbin considers
- 6:22to be those of limits, a kind of
- 6:25heterolimitation, right, which is more
- 6:28linked to material sources. So he
- 6:31places, right, as these external
- 6:33sources, the idea of natural law, of
- 6:36reason, the idea of law linked to the
- 6:38will of God, right? Historical and
- 6:41cultural experiences, social struggles,
- 6:44right? In other words, it's something
- 6:46that comes from society and interferes
- 6:48with the law, right? It's something
- 6:50that comes, let's say, from a cultural
- 6:53construction of society that will
- 6:55reflect, right, in the law, unlike the
- 6:57original sources, which are defined by
- 7:00the law itself. And another criterion
- 7:03for derived sources are those sources
- 7:06that work with the recognition of
- 7:09rights, right? And other sources that
- 7:12work with the delegation of rights.
- 7:14Right? An example of these sources of
- 7:17recognition are those norms. Legal
- 7:19sources that incorporate customs or
- 7:21those norms that say, "Ah, in this case
- 7:23, you can use the customs and
- 7:25traditions of the place," okay? We have
- 7:27another video about customs in the
- 7:29theory of legal regulation. You can
- 7:31watch it to delve deeper into this
- 7:33issue, okay? And the sources of
- 7:36delegation of law, folks, are those
- 7:38that grant other people the power to
- 7:41create law, right? So, notice that the
- 7:44state itself, right, it can delegate in
- 7:47a derivative way, therefore, okay, so
- 7:49that judges and ordinary people can
- 7:52also create law. When the judge makes
- 7:54the sentence, right, the legislator
- 7:56says: "Look, if you make the sentence
- 7:58with reasoning, ta-da, that sentence
- 8:00will form res judicata, that is, it
- 8:02will be the law between the parties, it
- 8:04will become the law between the parties
- 8:06, okay?" And similarly, contracts:
- 8:09ordinary people, if they enter into a
- 8:11contract with a specific object, a
- 8:13capable agent, the form prescribed by
- 8:15law, and there are no grounds for
- 8:17annulment of the transaction, the
- 8:19legislator himself says: "Hey, your
- 8:21contract here, folks, will be the law
- 8:23between the parties." So this is a
- 8:26phenomenon, right, in Norberto Bobbio's
- 8:28classification, okay? Of derived
- 8:30sources, right? Very good. But why
- 8:33derived, right, and original? Look, if
- 8:35you didn't quite understand this
- 8:37distinction, and it really is a bit
- 8:40confusing at first, it's because the
- 8:42expression "original source" refers to
- 8:44the origin of the very power to declare
- 8:46the law, okay? That's how Bobbio puts
- 8:49the issue. And Bobbio is concerned with
- 8:51the foundation of law, you understand?
- 8:52He's concerned with understanding where
- 8:55law comes from or where law can come
- 8:57from, right? Because Kelsin is a great
- 9:00reader of Kelsin, right? And Kelsin
- 9:03also works a lot on this issue, which
- 9:05is why he distinguishes between
- 9:06original and derived sources. The
- 9:08original question is where does the
- 9:10State's right to create law come from?
- 9:13These are the original sources. That's
- 9:15why he's going to talk about the social
- 9:17contract, right? He's going to talk
- 9:19about Olivian, about Robes, he's going
- 9:21to talk about the Constituent Assembly,
- 9:23right, which is the most contemporary
- 9:25conception, okay? And the derived
- 9:27sources are those that derive from
- 9:29existing law, right? Which are the
- 9:32cultures, right, the traditions, that
- 9:35vision we have of law that is already
- 9:38part of, let's say, a culture based on
- 9:41a previous legal order that precedes us
- 9:44, right, and from which we deduce,
- 9:46therefore, these sources of law. Okay,
- 9:49everyone? Great. So, everyone, the
- 9:52video is already long, so let's stop
- 9:56here and we'll continue in the third
- 9:59video. Let's go.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of 02/3 - Teoria do ordenamento jurídico de Norberto Bobbio - matéria de IED direito by Prof. Rafael Simioni, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 1,543 words across 243 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.